Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 07/07/1992
!If i Ali MMM-- I p I I I > # II Sy y lili i :MrnXwx uu„IrM„r, ............r ,rN W n:,rrlrN, ,r,Nw.' M.M„N'n,u, ii '1 : Sia " Colty y 'i } L;ounc y` + ! i !]' 1 eetin ytColt < f Agerlda X i ' ..... II I;... r..... Ili �J O C R M i� d�1 p'yC � r� fig. >.. < I a, Y nM i , y L...•. jO ii� t i! •�• � /{/�y rr 11 Y f ........�H I,II �•lYl... IY 1 i y, owl S I 1 Mayor B, n I�� i':l�!fi hh�er � it N Irr�� ) I P`• Aidy 'WoodA �, F" r(ii!i ;,ident gXyX ` i+ Jim Bennett Flaul Mann Christi Houser Leona Orr Jon Johnsen Jim White filar( I:::n:r:N::N..IN I I ,.+,• .lXIIul� �N Uk , r.rN,.,...n.NN..w....n::..............,.,..,,::r::,,:,I::nr:r:r:,::N:r:,.:.I:::::Nn:.M..n.._>.N�. It +a f ! 4 t 1 - , : Office of the il";Ility Ciler'ic �} i I � IIXi�II',i II CITY OF J-QSILEY�� SUMMARY AGENDA KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 7, 1992 r�ncR� Council Chambers 7 : 00 p.m. MAYOR: Dan Kelleher COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President Jim Bennett Christi Houser Jon Johnson Paul Mann Leona Orr Jim White CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ✓1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS +XA. Employee of the Month B. DARE Donation � J2 . PUBLIC HEA&1kb91 ✓A. West Hill Island Annexation - Ordinance X3 . CONSENT CALENDAR XA. Minutes ✓ B. Bills t' VC. Council Absence JD. Downtown Plan Zoning Program - Ordinance Amending Zoning Code and Ordinance Amending Zoning Map Kh'ne- C c m rn can Y5 XE. Bill of Sale - Soosette Creek Lift Station ✓F. Bill of Sale - Dally Tynes Apartments ✓G. Bill of Sale - Arco AM/PM Mini Market ✓H. Bill of Sale and Latecomer Agreement - West Valley Masonry ✓I. Latecomer Agreement - Robinson Sewer Extension ✓rK . Six Year Transportation Plan - Set Hearing Date . Final Environmental Impact Statement on 272nd/277th Corrid r 9- Set Hearing Date 6HER BUSINESS . Chestnut Ridge Annexation . Amendment to KCC 5. 19 - Amusement Devices - OrdinancerJO . 1991 Edition of Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Housing Code and Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings - ordinance Violations of Uniform Codes - Ordinance . 1991 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code - Ordinance r,. Violations of Uniform Fire Code - Ordinance 5. `BIDS ✓A. LID 338, LID 339 , Decant Stations, 94th Ave. Storm Drainage Improvements ✓B. Central Avenue Improvements, Gowe Street Improvements V6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS ✓7 . REPORTS ✓8. ADJOURNMENT NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available in the City Clerk's Office and the Kent Library. An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of this page. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A) Employee of the Month B) DARE Donation Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: WEST HILL ISLAND ANNEXATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This is the date and time set for a public hearing on the West Hill Island Annexation. This area of unincorporated King County is less than 100 acres in size and is entirely surrounded by the existing boundaries of the City of Kent. As a result, the City Council is authorized, on its own motion, to annex the area by ordinance after the public hearing is completed. If annexed, the West Hill Island will assume its share of the City's existing indebtedness and will be subject to the existing zoning requirements for newly annexed territory under the Kent City Code. 3 . EXHIBITS: Legal description, maps and ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee/Staff (3-0) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS- OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT• CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the Council adopt Ordinance iLld annexin the West Hill Island, subject to the City's existing indebtedness and to the zoning requirements of the Kent City Code. DISCUSSION• r1IC:' ACTION: 41Y-n Council Agenda Item No. 2A X CITY OF MID nlr CITY OF KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT (206) 859-3390 971CIA. MEMORANDUM July 1, 1992 TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO ANNEX THE WEST HILL ISLAND The West Hill Island area, which consists of approximately 90 acres and approximately 144 registered voters, is a high priority for annexation on the Council 's 1991-92 Target Issues. The Annexation Committee twice in 1991 conducted informational meetings at the West Hill fire station to inform citizens who live in the Island area about Kent. Resolution 1316 set Tuesday, July 7 , as the date for a public hearing to consider annexing the Island. - . Resolution 1150 adopted on October 6, 1987 listed a number of annexation policies, one of which was that a fiscal impact analysis shall be performed for each annexation. The Finance Department has done the analysis for the Island and finds that there may be a $39,282 dollar annual net loss to the City' s general fund with this annexation (see attached analysis) . This is not surprising since purely residential annexations rarely have a positive -financial impact. The impact analysis indicates as much as a $65, 115 dollar expenditure for the Police Department in the Island area. This figure is misleading since common since tells one that the Police Department is not going to spend $65, 115 dollars per year in a part of the City with only 90 acres, 200+- persons, and a low crime rate profile. These fiscal impact figures must be weighed against reality. In fact, the annexation of the West Hill Island may cost the City very little if any additional dollars. After all, the area will generate $62 , 043 dollars in revenue. It is my position that this area will probably break even. Also attached to this memo is a chronological order of events for the Island annexation. JPH/slc: island. 2 Attachments � � .� i � �i -�-- _ _ �__ _-� - -- _.�I===a_�J�_ _ram¢�?_�f=._�__ �'— _s_=cam�=�_`-_- �_�— �-���===x2z �==sue �?�ss !__ —._ _ z=�s'E=--=E ___ _ �� ^/ �. � ='-ti.,� j �Y �' 1 —������._.-_a— ��� � Ilia '3�__� � l � �3_� © � '�-- aroma _ �� � __ �� � / i �, i f � �� �� i ` ii — • � i , • • , • � • • • � —' • ♦ , , • CITY OF KENT FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS-West Hill ]stands #1 n OR THE YEAR 1992 :/ Total acres 11,881 89 e Total number of parcels 8,400 111 Total number of res. units 6,066 U 106 Total estimated population 39,650 P 261 Total assessed valuation 3,508,127,478 A 7,906,500 Criminal CITYWIDE General CIP Street Justice Storm Dr. Other Revenue: BUDGET Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prop. Tax a 3.186220) 10,947,540 A 21,172 21,172 Sales Tax 11,194,747 Utility Tax(2) 3,988,065 0 6,512 6,512 Special Assessments 2,234,133 Real Estate Excise 600,000 A 1,352 1,352 Gambling Taxes 514,000 Business Licenses and Permits(3) 230,746 0 443 443 Grants 278,025 P 1,830 1,830 State Shared Revenue 2,557,795 P 7,196 8,662 980 16,837 Local Sales Tax Criminal Justice 509,589 P 3,354 3,354 Fire Insurance Premium Tax 83,700 P 551 551 Drug Task Force Revenue 44,594 P 294 294 Fire Protection District # 37 2,302,924 0 Jail Intergovernmental Revenue 825,485 189 King County Medical Service Levy 527,540 A 1,189 1, ines and Forfeitures 566,759 A 1,277 1,277 77 "Parks 1,563,916 Miscellaneous Fees(4) 892,453 0 2,484 2,484 Interest Income 4,314,301 Water Utility 7,605,768 Sewer Utility 7,215,986 Drainage Utility(5) 3,242,563 0 2,331 2,331 Street Utility a1.90/M U 2,417 2,417 Golf 2,741,874 Estimated Total Revenue 64,982,503 42,102 1,352 8,662 4,628 2,331 2,968 62,043 Expenditures: General Government(6) 5,543,538 0 14,306 14,306 Police 8,558,635 P 56,338 8,777 65,115 Fire 10,157,327 Public Works-Street 4,114,207 A 1,352 7,920 9,272 Leisure Services 7,166,342 Health and Human Services 1,918,909 P 12,631 12,631 Debt Service 10,862,956 Water Utility 5,605,802 Sewer Utility 6,242,453 Drainage Utility(5) 5,616,856 0 2,331 (2,331) O Estimated Total Expenditures 65,787,025 83,275 1,352 10,251 8,777 (2,331) 0 101,324 Net Impact Income (Loss) (41,173) 0 (1,589) (4,149) 4,662 2,968 (39,282) CITY OF KENT NOTES TO WEST HILL ISLANDS ANNEXATION FOR THE YEAR 1992 (1) PROPERTY TAXES: City Regular Levy 2.67776 X 7,906,500 Assessed Valuation Excess Levy 0.50846 ------------ = 21,172 General Fund revenue 3.18622 (2) UTILITY TAXES: Estimated Average Yearly Residential Utility Bill; Electrical/Natural Gas 924 Telephone 186 Water 189 Sewer 230 Drainage 25 -------------- Rate Subtotal 1,555 X 3.50% = 54.41 Garbage 108 X 6.50% = 7.02 ---------- -------------- Total For Year 1,663 61.43 X 106 Res. Units= 6,512 (3) BUSINESS LICENSE: Estimated Population 261 --------------X 2692 Total Licenses = 17.72 Additional Licenses Total Population 39,650 X 25.00 Business in Home License ---------- �. 443.00 (4) MISCELLANOUS FEES: Planning, Engineering miscellaneous fees 783,154 General Government miscellaneous fees 109,299 ------------ 892,453 Assessed Valuation 7,906,500 --------------X 783,154 = 1,765 Planning, Engineering miscellaneous fees City Assessed Valuation 3,508,127,478 Estimated Population 261 General Government -X 109,299 = 719 General Government miscetleous fees Total Population 39,650 2,494 Total miscelteous fees (5) DRAINAGE UTILITY: Drainage Basin "N" monthly charge 1.75 X 12 months = 21.00 X 111 parcels = 2,331 Drainage Revenue Drainage expenses estimated by Engineering Department. This is a expense to the Street Department, but income to the Drainage Utility. (6) GENERAL GOVERNMENT: General Government expenses not expected to be as much using a ratio of annexation estimated population to the city total population, times the General Expenses. This is because some services are not expected to be needed. General Government 5,543,538 Police 8,558,635 Public Works-Street 4,114,207 Health and Human Services 1,918,909 Drainage Utility 5,616,856 -------------- Modified Expenditures 25,791,795 Modified Expenditures 25,791,795 ------------= 39.20% Modification Ratio X 261 Chestnut Ridge Est. Pop. Total City Expenses 65,787,025 --------- X 5,543,538 = 14,306 39,650 City Pop. ISLAND ANNEXATION I. Requirements. A. Unincorporated territory. B. Less than 100 acres. C. 80% of boundaries contiguous to city. II. Procedure. A. Council may pass resolution to annex. B. Resolution contents. 1. Describes boundaries. 2 . State number of voters in area. 3 . Set date for public hearing on annexation. a. Publish notice of hearing once a week for 2 weeks. III. Hearing. A. Residents have opportunity to be heard. B. Council may pass ordinance annexing area. C. Ordinance cannot be effective for 45 days. D. Contents of ordinance. 1. Provide for annexation of territory described in resolution. 2 . Council may provide that area assume existing indebtedness of city. 3 . Council may provide for adoption of proposed zoning regulation. E. Notice requirements. 1. Publish notice of effective date of annexation once a week for 2 weeks after passage. 2 . Include statement re: assumption of debt and zoning, if applicable. IV. Effective Date. A. 45 days after passage of ordinance, if no referendum petition filed. V. Referendum Petition. A. Signed by not less than 10% of qualified electors in area who voted in last state general election. B. Must be submitted within 45 day period to City Clerk. See RCW 35A.29. 170. C. If valid, see RCW 35A. 01. 040, question submitted to voters. 1. At next general election, if within next 90 days. 2 . Otherwise, at a special election. VI. Referendum Election. A. Approved if majority of votes cast approve. i 'I i ORDINANCE NO . AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, annexing certain real property to the City of Kent under the provisions of Chapter j 35A. 14 RCW, and complying with the procedures therein set forth. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, passed Resolution No. 1316 on June 16, 1992, declaring its ;, intention to annex to the City of Kent a certain island of ! territory contiguous to the city limits of the City of Kent; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the area to be annexed shall be subject to existing City zoning regulations as they apply to newly annexed territory; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the area to be , annexed would benefit from existing City services and facilities ; such that the annexed property should become subject to the City's '! existing indebtedness; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held a public hearing upon said Resolution 1316 after proper notice as required by law; NOW, iTHEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Area Annexed. An island of unincorporated territory, which is less than one hundred (100) acres in size and is bounded on all sides by the boundaries of the City of Kent j (hereafter, the "West Hill Island") , which is legally described as :i follows: i SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN !i i ' i i' ,I shall be annexed to the City of Kent. A map of the West Hill Island annexation area is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. I i Section 2 . Taxation and Assessments. The West Hill Island shall be assessed and taxed at the same rate and upon the same basis as the lands now in the City of Kent are assessed and taxed Ito pay for any presently outstanding indebtedness of the City of Kent that has been contracted prior hereto, or exists at, the i% effective date of this annexation ordinance. Section 3 . Applicable Zoning Regulations. The West Hill Island shall be subject to the City of Kent' s existing zoning regulations, specifically those regulations that apply to newly annexed territory. Section 4 . Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any ; clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of I ( this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to ;; other persons or circumstances. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force forty-five (45) days from the time of its final approval and passage as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ''! ATTEST: ii I i IIBRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK j 2 i I i I WEST HILL ISLAND ANNEXATION DESCRIPTION 6-18-92 Those portions of Sections 15 and 22 in Township 22 North Range 4 EWM, recorded plats, recorded short plats, government lots, land donation claims and all public rights-of-ways, deeded and/or dedicated lying within the following described property. Beginning at the southwest corner of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter in said section 15 being the True Point of Beginning of property herein described; thence north along the west line thereof to the centerline of S.S.H. 5-A (AKA) Kent-Des Moines Road; thence easterly and southerly along said centerline to a point of intersection with the west boundary of the Enos Cooper Donation Claim No. 38 ; thence south along the west line thereof to the southwest corner of Bleckers Valley View recorded in Volume 60 of plats page 40; thence east along the south line thereof to a point on the centerline of said road; thence southerly along the centerline thereof to a point on the north line of the south half of the northeast quarter of said section 22 ; thence west along the north line thereof to the northwest corner of said south half; thence north along the west line of said northeast quarter to the southeast corner of the plat of Valley Vista recorded in Volume 56 of plats pages 42 and 43 ; thence west along the south line thereof to the southwest corner of Lot 9, Block 6, in said plat of Valley Vista; thence in a northerly, northeasterly and easterly direction along the westerly and northerly line of said Lot 9 to a point of intersection with a line projected south 00 29131" west from the corner common to Lots 3, 4 , 10, 11 and 12 , Block 6 of said plat; thence north 00 29131" east along said line to said common corner; thence south 69 37110" east along the northerly line of Lot 10, Block 6, to the corner common to Lots 4 , 5, 6 and 10 in said Block 6; thence north 23 14140" east to the north margin of George Peck County Road; thence in an easterly and northeasterly direction along the northerly and westerly margin of said road to the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, said plat of Valley Vista No. 2 ; thence west along the north line of said plat of Valley Vista No. 2 to the southwest corner of the Cooper Donation .Claim; thence north along the west line of said donation claim to a point which intersects the easterly extension of the north line of Lot 7, Block 1, said plat of Suburban View; thence west along said easterly extension of said north line to the northwest corner of said Lot 7 , Block 1; thence south along the west line of said Block 1 to the southwest corner of Lot 3 in said Block 1; thence south 37 00138" west along the southeasterly right-of-way margin of 41st Avenue South to a point of intersection with a line extended south 52 59122" east from the most northerly corner of Lot 4, Block 7, in said plat of Valley Vista, which corner is contiguous to the east line of Lot 3 in said Block 7 ; thence north 52 59122" west along said line to the said most northerly corner of said Lot 4, Block 7 ; thence north along said east line of Lot 3 in said Block 7 to the northeast corner of said Lot 3 in said Block 7 ; thence south 89 EXHIBIT 35123" west along the north line of said plat of Valley Vista extended westerly to the southwest corner of the southeast quarter .. of the southwest quarter in said section 15 to the T.P.O.B. all lying within King County Washington. EXHIBIT= 1 •� Fx r y -RRM - 4M f= 01i0 CONSENT CALENDAR ui T9' 13 . City Council Action: C� � ,�Councilmember � V^�""'� moves, Councilmember � seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through Abe ap oved,, Discussion al 14 Action ;?y ! 30A Approval of Minutes. �N Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of June 16, 1992 . �3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through June 30, 1992 after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 2 : 00 p.m. on July 7, 1992 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers Amount Council Agenda Item No. 3 A B Kent, Washington June 16, 1992 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers Bennett, Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr, White and Woods, City Administrator Chow, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris, City Engineer Gill, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief Crawford, Finance Director McCarthy, Human Resources Director Olson, and Informa- tion Services Director Spang. Public Works Director Wickstrom and Parks Director Wilson were not in attendance. Approximately 150 people were at the meeting. PUBLIC Kent Community Forum Recognition. Mayor Kelleher COMMUNICATIONS noted that last February forums on growth manage- ment were held with citizens to obtain their views on how the City should handle future growth and meet the requirements of the State Growth Manage- ment Act. He noted that forty-five people volun- teered their time to be trained as facilitators for small group meetings held in their homes, workplaces, or municipal buildings . He explained that the conveners showed a video tape on growth issues in the City, initiated a discussion and had w, each participant fill out an opinionaire. He then presented each of the conveners a Certificate of Appreciation for their involvement and facilita- tion of the Growth Management Community Participa- tion Program. Orr also thanked all who partici- pated and stated that this project was very well received and produced excellent results. Regional Justice Center. A man from the audience asked why the Regional Justice Center was not in- cluded in the Growth Management Community Partici- pation Program survey. Planning Manager Satterstrom said that he would not recommend that type of survey for such a facility, and noted that there are other ways in which citizens can be involved in the design of a public facility. White stated that he has asked for a copy of the Envi- ronmental Impact Statement on the Regional Justice Center and Satterstrom agreed to provide him with one. The Mayor pointed out that if a permit application were received by the City of Kent, environmental information would be required, but that no permit application has been received. 1 June 16, 1992 CONSENT WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through CALENDAR 0 be approved, with the exception of Item D which was removed by Councilmember White, and incorpor- ating the City Attorney' s amendment into Item E. White seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of June 2 , 1992 . STREETS (BIDS - ITEM 5A) 1992 Asphalt Overlay. Bid opening was May 20 and three bids were received. The project includes overlay of several streets within the City with the scope of work broken down into seven different schedules. The low bidder for all seven schedules was Lakeside Industries; however, project funds are only sufficient to complete the first four schedules. The low bidder for those four sched- ules is M.A. Segale. Staff therefore recommends, and the Public Works Committee has concurred with, awarding Schedules 1-4 of the 1992 Asphalt Overlay Program to M.A. Segale for the bid amount of $142 , 536. 20. WHITE SO MOVED. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. STREET (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) CLOSURES Street Closure - Balloon Classic. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3046 authorizing closure of certain public streets, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H) Street Closure - Canterbury Faire. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3047 authorizing closure of certain public streets, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I) Street Closure - Cornucopia Days. ADOPTION of Ordinance No. 3048 granting a street use permit to Kent Lion' s Club for the Cornucopia Days festival, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. 2 June 16, 1992 TRAFFIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K) CONTROL 196th/200th Corridor. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign an interagency agreement with King County naming Kent as lead agency for design of west leg of 196th/200th Street Corridor, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L) Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign interlocal agreement with King County for the purpose of carrying out certain provisions of the Commute Trip Reduction Act of 1991, subject to approval of final form by the City Attorney, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M) Central Avenue Improvement (Gowe to Titus) TIB Grant. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign agree- ment with WSDOT for a TIB Construction Grant in the amount of $437 , 520 for the Central Avenue Im- provement project and establishment of the budget for same, as recommended by the Public Works Com- mittee. SEWERS (BIDS - ITEM 5B) North Park Sanitary Sewer Rebuild. Bid opening was June 2 with eight bids received. The low bidder was Robison Construction in the amount of $192 ,796. 98 . Staff recommends that the low bid be accepted and the contract awarded to Robison Con- struction. WHITE SO MOVED. Woods seconded and the motion carried. SHORT (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J) PLAT Dead Tree Short Plat/Family Homes Short Plat #1. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and warranty agree- ment submitted by MDI/Profit Sharing Plan (Paul Morford) for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 340 feet of water main extension and 315 feet of street improvements constructed in the vicinity of 113th Avenue S .E. north of S .E. 256th for the Dead Tree Short Plat and Family Homes Short Plat #1 and release of the cash bond after expiration of the one-year maintenance period, as recommended by the Public Works Commit- tee. 3 June 16, 1992 ANNEXATIONS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) West Hill Island Annexation - Resolution. ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1316 setting July 7 , 1992 as the date for a public hearing for the West Hill Island Annexation. The City Council Planning Committee passed a motion on June 2, 1992 to place this item on tonight' s consent calendar so the appropriate resolution can be prepared announcing the City' s intent to annex the West Hill Island. In general, this area is bounded on the West by Military Road, on the north by SR 516, on the east by SR 516, and on the south by approximately S . 240th and S . 244th extended. City Attorney Lubovich announced that a new resolution has been prepared to replace the resolution in the agenda packet. He explained that the new resolution amends Section 1 by allowing for a street boundary and a map to be attached as an exhibit, noting that this would take the place of a legal description. There were no objections to the amendment from the Council , and the amendment was incorporated. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) Chestnut Ridge Annexation. ACCEPTANCE of 10 percent notice of intent for annexation of approx- imately 190 acres north of South 208th Street between 92nd Avenue South and 100th Avenue S.E. and authorization to set July 7 as date to meet with the initiators, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. HAZARDOUS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3N) WASTE Used Motor Oil Collection Events. AUTHORIZATION for staff to accept the grant from the Local Grants Program of the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program for Seattle/King County and to proceed with the used motor oil collection events, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. MUSEUM (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) White River Historical Society Museum Services Agreement for 1992 . APPROVAL of the White River Historical Society Services Agreement for 1992 with a level of funding of $2 , 500 as recommended by the Planning Committee. The amount of $2 , 500 was set aside in the 1992 budget. 4 June 16, 1992 CITY (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B) POLICY Budget Issues. Finance Director McCarthy noted (Budget that sales tax and building permit revenues slowed Issues) down in 1991, that the City instituted a hiring slowdown and freeze, and that 1991 ended with ex- penditures greater than revenues by $1. 1 million. He projected that expenditures will exceed reve- nues this year by $2 . 2 million and that if no action is taken, expenditures will exceed revenues in 1993 by $2 . 9 million. He explained that sales tax is showing no growth, that utility taxes are not what they projected, that building permit activity is below what was budgeted, and that the City is losing money on interest income. He noted that in December 1991 there was a reserve fund balance of $2 , 000, 000 but it was exceeded by $1,400, 000, and that the budgeted fund balance for the end of 1992 is $500, 000 . He said that the City is expending more than it is taking in and something needs to be done. He listed the cuts which have already been made and the savings, and explained that departments were asked to propose additional cuts which totaled 23 . 5 positions . He stated that the goal is to have all departments share evenly and that departments who have already lost a number of people would not have to make additional cuts. He listed required vacancies as follows: Planning - 1, Police - 8 , Fire - 9 , Public Works - 1, and Parks - 5 . He added that adjustments could be made in Equipment Rental , in the CIP funding, or by raising taxes, but that there would still have to be some additional vacancies. He noted that looking at vacancies now instead of next year would protect the City' s financial position by laying off as few people as possible. Upon Woods ' question, he noted that 8 or 9 positions have been vacated by attrition this year, with 9 or 10 more expected by the end of the year. He confirmed for her that the budget for 1992 is okay, but that difficult decisions must be made regarding the budget for 1993 . Chow noted that if expenditures continue at the present rate and no one resigns, the City will be in dire shape by the first of the year. Upon Woods ' question, McCarthy explained that since the new furlough and layoff policy came out, department heads were asked how they could cut their budgets by 5%, and that they listed layoffs and other miscellaneous 5 June 16, 1992 CITY ways. Woods stated that she has asked several POLICY times for creative suggestions to address the (Budget budget concerns and that she was shocked and Issues) dismayed to receive a confidential memo at 5: 00 p.m. on Thursday regarding layoffs. She said she is not pleased with this proposal and wants something else tried. White stated that although he spoke with Mr. Chow on Thursday, nothing was said to him about the proposed layoffs, and that he does not appreciate that. He asked when the last Executive Committee was held and whether those meetings are open to Councilmembers. Chow responded that the last meeting was held on Wednesday and that Administration can choose whether to invite Councilmembers. White noted that there has been discussion in the past about the accuracy of financial projections and suggested that McCarthy is projecting too high. He noted that figures are inaccurate and that although he has asked previously, he has never received an answer to how many people have been hired since the selective hiring process was begun. McCarthy responded that the people hired early in 1991 had been recruited for previously and that Police and Fire hired some of their officers early in 1991 and the other positions were frozen. He added that two Corrections posi- tions were filled because of double bunking and some in the Transportation Engineering area were filled because of the street utility. White told Chow that he sees the layoffs as a way to get at the Parks Department and asked if Parks has ever been allowed to consider raising fees or proposing a different fee schedule for participants who live outside the City. Chow explained that each de- partment is authorized to offer proposals to —— noted that Parks had proposed increasing fees, thereby lowering their number of layoffs. White pointed out that lay- offs or not hiring anyone should have been con- sidered during the budget process. He noted that Chow is paid over $100, 000 a year with benefits, and McCarthy over $80, 000, to keep the City on course, and that he is sadly disappointed. Chow pointed out that we are in a recession, thanked White for his comments and said they would try to improve. 6 June 16, 1992 CITY Johnson noted that in a memo sent to Council- POLICY members on 11/18/91, the Mayor said that he would (Budget like to unfreeze some Police and Fire positions Issues) and that filling additional Public Safety posi- tions would be a top priority in the coming year. Johnson also said that a memo to Councilmembers dated 12/1/91 states that Administration would consult with the Council prior to implementation of any measures. He said that the memo delivered last Thursday implementing a layoff program and asking for 24 additional positions to be laid off by 7/1/92 was directed to department heads, not Councilmembers. He voiced concern that Adminis- tration has not kept the Council informed of the financial situation and therefore the Council has not been able to take a position as to the best course of action for the City. He added that de- partment heads and other city employees have always been willing to provide the information he has requested. He noted that as part of the budget process he had suggested eliminating positions in Administration, eliminating Cityline, eliminating merit pay for department heads and City Administrator, freezing all non-union step increases, and reducing cost of living adjust- ments. He said that public safety employees should be the last to be cut, and that the City should determine what it' s priorities are. He said that he no longer has confidence in City Administration to provide him with necessary information on any matter, noting that the memo regarding layoffs was directed to department heads rather than the Council, although the Council is ultimately in charge of the City. He said he would like to see the Mayor and City Administrator meet with employees of the City and department heads to work out a plan to get the City out of this financial situation. Orr said that she was very disturbed about the way she received this information, and that the pro- posal goes against everything the Council had said for many months. She noted that her memo was marked confidential, that she received it Thursday night, and she was therefore surprised to see the headlines in Friday' s paper. She voiced concern about the impact to employees of reading this in the paper and said that the Council and department 7 June 16, 1992 CITY heads should have been told first, and allowed POLICY time to warn people who may be laid off before it (Budget appeared in the paper. She agreed that not every Issues) effort has been made to work with employees to come up with a proposal for voluntary time off or with a different compromise, and that to propose layoffs first is not the best approach. Houser concurred with the idea of meeting with employees, noting that all must work together. She asked for more suggestions from employees. Bennett concurred and emphasized that the City is in serious financial trouble. White said the City needs good accurate information and good strong management. Woods pointed out that the Council has no staff of their own and are totally dependent upon city staff to make their jobs possible and to give citizens good quality service. She said it is inappropriate that employees have been told not to communicate with Councilmembers. Mann explained that his reference to considering selling the golf course came out of deep frustra- tion. He noted that every position in this organ- ization is important, but that if Administration is determined to make layoffs, that the layoff policy exclude Police and Fire personnel for the following reasons: 1. Officers are screened and selected after going through a very vigorous process including a written test, agility test, oral exam, physical fitness, psychological testing, lie detector tests and graduation from the Academy before they are hired full time. 2 . Departments are presently stretched to the limit, and more support people are needed. 3 . Elected officials are commissioned to provide the safest environment possible to citizens. HE MOVED that City Administration amend its layoff policy to exclude Police and Fire personnel. Houser seconded and the motion carried. 8 June 16, 1992 CITY White said he hopes that Administration would POLICY present a revised proposal at next Council meeting (Budget and that departments be allowed to look at adjust- Issues) ing their rates. He noted that layoffs are inevitable but that the City should also look at increased fees. Woods said that one of the greatest concerns about the proposal Council received was the reality of pitting department against department. She asked the management of Public Safety to work as hard as possible to come up with other means of saving money, and noted that it will be difficult to spread 25 positions over the remaining depart- ments. She stated that there is a lot of good will in City Hall and that people are willing to make a sacrifice. She said this situation can be handled by collaboration, teamwork, and building trust from the bottom up, and that Council is sending policy makers a message that that is the way they want it done. She said everybody should be involved in the process, and that everyone has integrity and worth in the system, that all w employees are important to the Council and to the citizens of Kent, and that their ideas have value. She challenged Administration to ensure that all work together to address this problem. Bill Doolittle, 412 N. Washington, said it is very reassuring to citizens to hear the Council speak up as they have tonight. He noted that the Finance Director is called on for answers to many issues and there may be some savings there. He said he agrees with White regarding the Parks Department and noted that Parks had proposed a reduction of . 5 personnel as well as cutting other expenses, but that Administration had turned the personnel cut into 5. He said that Parks is stretched as much as any other department and that Kent is known for its parks. He pointed out that the newspaper had reported that there was no representative from Administration at the Public Safety Committee meeting when layoffs were discussed, and voiced surprise at that, since there is usually at least one representative in attendance. He stated that at a workshop earlier this year there was consensus among the Council to eliminate the frozen positions. He thanked Woods „� 9 June 16, 1992 CITY for her comments tonight and agreed that the Coun- POLICY cil has not gotten good information. He suggested (Budget determining where too much money is being spent Issues) and pointed out that there is not much left in the contingency fund. He said that a reduction in the utility tax is shown, but not the collection of the new $1. 90 tax. He noted that a decrease in interest income is shown, although the City just refinanced $10 million in long term debt. He said the Council should get some accurate information and make decisions and set policy, which is what they are charged with doing, and that if they continue to function as they have tonight, they are on the right track. John Willetts, President of the Firefighters Union, commended the Council for their comments tonight and stated that the number of calls they receive increases by 10% each year and that 35% of the calls come in simultaneously. He said they would not want to lose nine more positions in addition to the nine unfilled positions. He said they were told the preparation of 5% cuts was an exercise. He noted that he is the president of the largest union in the City, and has not been approached about what his membership is willing to do to help, and that they are willing to help. There were no further comments on this issue. POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 30) 1992 Jail Health Services Contract. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign 1992 Jail Health Services Contract with Seattle-King County Department of Public Health. This contract provides for nursing staff for the inmates. FIRE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) Vetoed Fireworks Ordinance. The current drought conditions in the Pacific Northwest have created the probability for a serious fire threat this summer. As a consequence, during the June 2 , 1992 Council meeting, an emergency ordinance limiting discharge of fireworks to July 4th was considered and passed. Following its passage, the ordinance was vetoed by the Mayor. 10 June 16, 1992 FIRE Mayor Kelleher noted that the vetoed ordinance is being submitted for the record and consideration by Council . MANN MOVED to enter vetoed Ordinance No. 3045 into the record and to override the Mayor' s veto of Ordinance No. 3045. Orr seconded. White pointed out that he had initially voted against this ordinance but that after doing addi- tional research, he will support the override of the veto. Houser stated that the Council has re- ceived a letter from Mr. and Mrs. J. Kay Miller in support of banning fireworks, and MOVED that it and all other letters received on this matter be made a part of the record. White seconded and the motion carried. Johnson spoke in support of the override and asked that the Public Safety Commit- tee consider a permanent restriction of the use of fireworks to the 4th of July in ample time to have public hearings on whether or not to do so. City Attorney Lubovich clarified that this ordinance only restricts the discharge of fireworks to July 4th, and that it has no effect on the sale or own- ership of fireworks. John Stone, 431 E. Meeker, pointed out that millions of dollars are spent on fireworks in the United States which could be spent on programs for the homeless and others who need help. He noted that fireworks are dangerous explosives and people are injured each year. He also said that the ordinance means nothing if it is not enforced. Stone noted that although fireworks are a tradi- tion, there are many more people in America today, and that traditions change. Leo Arthur stated that he had operated two fireworks stands in the City for 3 years. He pointed out that State law covers a period of one week, and that this ordi- nance would cut their business by six days since no one will buy fireworks if they cannot shoot them off. He added that fireworks stand operators ordered their fireworks a year ago and the stands and people are ready to go. He said it is wrong to pass an ordinance at the last minute, and this should be considered for a year from now. 11 June 16, 1992 FIRE A woman from the audience read a letter from the Burien Eagles Junior Drill Team requesting that the proposed ban on the sale of fireworks within the City of Kent not be passed. The letter stated that injuries would increase due to the non- availability of "safe" fireworks, that fire inci- dents will increase, that it is nearly impossible to enforce such a ban, and that the ban would greatly affect their fund-raising capability. WOODS MOVED that the letter be made a part of the record. White seconded and the motion carried. Mann' s motion to override the Mayor' s veto of Ordinance No. 3045 then carried unanimously. COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER WHITE Excused Absence from City Council Meeting. Approval of a request from Councilmember Jim White for an excused absence from the June 16 , 1992 City Council meeting since he will be attending the AWC Convention. This item was removed from the agenda at the request of Councilmember White. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through June 15, after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 2 : 00 p.m. on June 16, 1992 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount 6/1-6/15/92 119069-119580 $2 , 845, 642 . 28 Approval of checks issued for payroll : Date Check Numbers Amount 6/19/92 01173572-01174125 $ 452 , 649 . 38 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8 : 50 p.m. Brenda Jacoberd C City Clerk 12 f } Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 . 1992 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR EXCUSED ABSENCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of a request from Council President Woods for an excused absence from the City Council meeting on July 7 , 1992 since she will be out of town. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Council President Woods 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Council President Woods (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3C X MEMORANDUM TO: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR FROM: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT DATE: JUNE 22, 1992 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE I would like to request an excused absence from the July 7, 1992 City Council meeting since I will be out of town that evening. Thank you for your consideration. JW:jb 41Y Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN PLAN ZONING PROGRAM NO. ZCA-90-6 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance 3050 amending the zoning code and Ordinance .3051 amending the zoning map to implement the Downtown Plan Zoning Program approved by the City Council at its June 2 , 1992 meeting. The proposal establishes three zoning districts, outlines new development standards for the downtown area, creates a design review process for new downtown development, modifies parking requirements, design of sidewalks, and lighting of pedestrian corridors. - 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordin J_ ning code and ordinance amending the zon i � 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: City Council 6/2/92 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3D X i i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to land use and zoning, amending the Kent Zoning Code, (Ordinances 1827 and 2404) , Chapter 15 of the Kent City Code, to amend the Downtown Commercial (DC) district, create a Downtown Commercial Enterprise (DCE) district and a Downtown Limited Manufacturing (DLM) district, provide a design review process for certain zoning districts, add new sections 15. 04 . 115, 15. 04 . 116, and 15. 09 . 048 ; and amending sections 15. 04 . 110, 15 . 05. 040, 15 . 05 . 070, 15 . 06. 050, and 15. 07 . 060 WHEREAS, the Kent City Council adopted a resolution amending and updating the Kent Downtown Plan on May 2 , 1989 ; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has the statutory authority to amend its Zoning Code pursuant to RCW 35A. 63 ; and WHEREAS, the Kent City Council approved a Planning Department Work Program to implement the goals, policies, and objectives set forth in the amended Kent Downtown Plan through revisions in the Kent Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department conducted public '' workshops on August 2 , 1990, and October 25, 1990, to solicit If ;i I I i y . comments from the public relating to downtown zoning issues; and WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Commission held extensive j public hearings on the proposed downtown zoning revisions, ( beginning in March of 1991, through February of 1992 ; and I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to recommend �'to the City Council the Revised Downtown Zoning Program, with ,;modifications, on February 24, 1992 ; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted workshops on the :'.proposed downtown zoning on March 30 and May 19 , 1992 , and ,!unanimously adopted the Planning Commission' s recommendation, 'with modifications, on June 2 , 1992 ; NOW, THEREFORE, I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON ('DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : i Section 1. Section 15. 04 . 110 of the Kent City Code is amended as follows: 15. 04 . 110 DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL OR DC. Purpose: It is the purpose of this district to provide a place for, and create environmental conditions which will encourage the location of, dense and varied retail , office, residential business., civic and recreational activities which i will benefit and contribute to the vitality of a central "downtown" location, recognize and preserve the historic pattern of development in the area and to implement the land use goals and policies in j the Downtown Plan. In the DC area, permitted uses i should be primarily pedestrian oriented and able to take advantage of on-street and structured off- street parking lots,--while—teeth aete--and 2 � . I i I ! I I' III I peelestrian eriented uses may Prevail in the E)G-2 area. A. Principally Permitted Uses in DC Zone i j Al All of the uses listed below are permitted in the DC zoning district excepting that in the area designated on the map shown below, entitled the Ground Floor Retail/Service Area, the around level or street level portion of all buildings must be retail or pedestrian-oriented service/repair uses. Ground Floor Retail/Service Area ' V. SMITH. ST. W. HARRISODI • ST. uuuuuuuuuuu- KEEKER D C © ST T(TU5 5T ' F lu 6 W � o Ground Floor Retail/Service Use Required 1. Retail establishments, including convenience goods, department and variety stores, and specialty shops such as apparel and accessories gift shops toy shops, cards and paper goods home and home accessory shops antique shops, and book shops shepping geeds, lines" •{elething, variety, lines— (hardware, furniture, appiianees) . i; I, I it II 1 II li II i �I 2 . Personal services such as barber and beauty shops, launderett , dry cleaning, I television and radio repair, shoe repair. I 3 . Food-related shops, restaurants (including outdoor seating areas and excluding drive-in j restaurants) , nightclubs, taverns. j' 4 . Professional and administrative offices. 6. Performing and cultural arts uses, such as theaters museums art galleries and studios. Reerean a. l uses sueh FHB the-'---, bewling alleys, danee halls (must L.,•._ ..ne Tc'i_. 7 . Hotels and Yeetels. 8 . Printing establishments, business services such as copy services. 9 . Mortuaries 10. Existing dwellings may be rebuilt, repaired and otherwise changed for human occupancy. Accessory uses for existing dwellings may be constructed. Such uses are garages, carports, storage sheds and fences. 11. Parks. Munieipal uses and buildings, Seetlen 15. 94 .290 . 12 . Multifamily residential uses, when established in buildings with commercial or office uses and not located on the ground floor. 13 . Multifamily residential uses for senior citizens. 14 . Banks and financial institutions (excluding drive-through) . 15. Group Homes, Class 1-A, 1-B and 1-C. 16. Any other use . that is determined by the Planning Director to be of the same general character as the above permitted uses and in accordance with the stated. purpose of the district. B. Prineleall-f Permitted IJ--;oq Jig RP .2 gene I. All ef t.�e prinelpally permitted uses in the 3—Feed leekers—(with er witheut 4 . Autefftebile rental serviees. .5 Sales f tire a aute aeeesseries withsite ii 6 Mar-ine era€t sales and it Meter vehiele sales (new and used) 4 T is I I i �j iI I i prel •bttea in this a } t i t D. Special Permit Uses The following uses are permitted provided that they conform to the development standards listed in Section 15. 08. 020: l-- rehes 1. ?;,arsery ^�-: and Day care centers with no more than 12 children and with no on-site parking. E. Accessory Uses 1. Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage facilities, which must be enclosed, and loading and unloading areas. 2 . For permitted uses, hazardous substance land uses, including on-site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage facilities, which are not subject to cleanup permit requirements of Kent City Code Chapter 4 . 19 and which do not accumulate more than 5, 000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at any one time on site, subject to the provisions of Section 15. 08 . 050, except off-site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage facilities which are not permitted in this district. F. Conditional Uses 1. Multifamily residential uses , when not combined with commercial or office uses. 2 . Commercial parking lots or structures 3 . Railway and bus depots, taxi stands 4. Group Homes Class 2-A, 2-B, 2-C and 3 . 5. General conditional uses as listed in Section 15. 08 . 030 6. Equipment rental and leasing se y4ees—fE�C— ne enl `.) 5 I� li 4--uteifietive repair serviees, net to elude G. Development Standards 1. Minimum Lot. Minimum lot of record or 5 ,000 square feet whichever is less. 2 . Maximum site coverage. One hundred (100) I, percent. 3 . Setbacks. None, except as required by landscaping, or if off-street parking is provided on site, and emeept "`en i distriet, and then feet rea-r a . side yard_shall b rFEfaired. See the downtown design review criteria outlined in Section 15. 09. 048 . 4 . Height Limitation. Four (4) stories or sixty (60) feet. See the downtown design review criteria outlined in Section 15. 09. 048 . Hewever, the ^' " Bir "t"- shell be--autherized to grant additienal stern—in=heig t, if a,,rin Develepment Plan Review, it is- frem the eentintdit ; of the area. Mere, than ene as , ste ry may be = t eby the Planning Ge- 5. The landscaping requirements of Chapter 15. 07 shall apply. H. SicL The sign requirements of Chapter 15. 06 shall ;; apply. I. Off-Street Parking The off-street parking requirements of Chapter 15. 05 shall apply. J. Development Plan Review Development plan approval is required, as provided in Section 15.09 . 010. K. Downtown Design Review jl The downtown design review requirements of Section 15 09 . 048 shall apply. i. 6 �. `II I I I! ji I ,I I� Section 2 . The Kent City Code is amended to establish a new Section 15. 04 . 115 creating the Downtown Commercial Enterprise (DCE)'` district as follows: Section 15.04. 115. DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE. l� IiPurpose: The purpose of this district is to encourage and promote higher density development and a variety and mixture lof compatible retail commercial, residential , civic, recreational and service activities in the downtown area to ( enhance the edestrian-oriented character of the downtown and to implement the goals and policies of the Downtown Plan. A. Principally Permitted Uses 1 Retail establishments including convenience goods department and variety stores, and specialty shops such as apparel and accessories sift shops, toy shops cards and paper goods home and home accessory shops antique shops and book shops. 2 . Personal services such as barber and i' beauty shops launderettes and household repair shops. - 3 Food related shops restaurants (including outdoor eating areas and excluding drive-through restaurants) , jtaverns. 4 Professional and administrative offices, including medical/dental legal real estate, and financial ! services. 5. Business and technical schools and schools and studios for photography, art music, and dance. 6 Business service establishments , such as blueprinting photocopying and consulting services. 7 Multifamily residential uses including housing for senior citizens. 8. Banks and financial institutions. 9 . Hotels and motels. 10 Drive-through businesses excluding drive- , through restaurants. 11 Performing and cultural arts facilities, iiincluding movie theaters. 12 Public facilities and uses including regional and community facilities, such as libraries, government office buildings and parks. 13 Existinq dwellings may be rebuilt repaired and otherwise changed for human occupancy. Accessory uses for existing dwellings may be constructed such as garages !; carports storage sheds and fences. I 7 j I� I' I I �I I t I {J� 1 YY 14 Preschools and daycare centers. I 15 Group Homes Class 1-A. 1-B and 1-C. 16 Other uses designated by the Planning Director as consistent with the purpose of the DCE zoning district. i B. Special Permit Uses i j 1. Churches. C. Accessory Uses i — 1 Accessory uses and buildings customarily ' appurtenant to a permitted use such as incidental storage facilities which must be enclosed loading and unloading i areas. 2 For permitted uses hazardous substance_ " land uses including on-site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage facilities which are not subject to cleanup permit requirements of Kent City Code Chapter 4 . 19 and which do not ' accumulate more than 5, 000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at any one time on site, subject to the provisions of Section 15 08. 050 , except, off- site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage facilities which ;; are not permitted in this district. 3 Day care facilities operated in conjunction , with a permitted use. D. Conditional Uses 1 Commercial parking lots and structures. 2 Railway and bus depots taxi stands. 3 Drive-through restaurants only if located ' in a building havinct at least two stories. 4 Group Homes Class 2-A 2-B 2-C and 3 . 5. General conditional uses as listed in Section 15. 08 . 030. E. Development Standards 1. Minimum Lot. 5 , 000 square feet. 2 . Maximum site coverage. One hundred (100) percent. 3 . Setbacks. No minimum setback is required. When a rear and/or side yard abuts a residential district, then a 20 foot rear and/or side yard setback may be required. ISee the downtown design review criteria outlined in Section �I 15. 09 . 048 . �I �I 8 I i it rr it 4 . Height Limitation. No maximum height limit. ISee the downtown design review criteria outlined in Section i 1115.09. 048. ;I 5. The landscaping requirements of Chapter '115. 07 shall apply. i I F. Signs The sign requirements of Chapter 15. 06 shall apply. G. Off-Street Parking The off-street parking requirements of Chapter 15 . 05 shall apply. H. Development Plan Review Development Plan approval is required, as provided in Section 15. 09.010. I. Downtown Design Review The downtown design review requirements of ;: Section 15 09 048 shall apply. i, Section 3 . The Kent City Code is amended to -� ;' establish new Section 15. 04 . 116 creating the Downtown Limited ;, Manufacturing (DIM) district as follows: 15 . 04 . 116. DOWNTOWN LIMITED MANUFACTURING (DIM) I i DISTRICT Purpose: It is the purpose of this zoning district to provide ifor light industrial land uses which may coexist with retail , ., business residential and service land uses in the downtown larea This district is intended to provide areas for those flight manufacturing activities that desire to conduct business in proximity to a variety of land uses such as is possible ionly in the downtown community. A. Principally Permitted Uses 1 Retail uses intended primarily to serve the ; needs of the manufacturing area such as equipment lumber, ltools and restaurants (excluding drive-through) . 2 Manufacturing processing assembling and il packaging of articles products or merchandise made from jipreviously prepared natural or synthetic materials including j! but not limited to bristles bone canvas cellophane and 11similar synthetics chalk clay (pulverized only, with gas or '! electric kilns) cloth cork feathers felt fiber, I. 9 i �i II � ili ' I� lass includin lass finishing) ra hite fiberglass fur a I hair horn leather, paper, paraffin plastic, metals, semiprecious and precious metals or stones putty, pumice, shell textiles tobacco wire wood wool and yarn, which generate low levels of noise dust, vibration truck traffic, jor odors Prohibited are those manufacturing activities having potentially deleterious operational characteristics, ';such as initial processing of raw . materials (fording, ��smeltering refining and forming) . 3 Manufacture and packaging of food-related , products such as confectionery products bakery products, ;'fruits and vegetables beer and wine and prepared food ';specialties. 4 Printing publishing and allied industries including such processes as lithography.. etching, engraving binding blueprinting photocopying, film processing and similar operations ; such uses may have on-site customer service. 5 Custom arts and crafts manufacturing and 'artist workshops studios and galleries. 6. Business and administrative offices. 7 Business professional educational_ and construction services. 8. Finance insurance and real estate services. 9 Complexes which include a combination of 'uses including a mixture of office storage and light manufacturing uses. 10 Public facilities and uses including regional and community facilities such as libraries , government office buildings and marks. 11 Multifamily residential uses. 12 Other similar uses which the Planning Director finds compatible with the Principally Permitted uses !'described herein and are consistent with the purpose of the DLM District. B. Special Permit Uses 1 Preschools and daycare centers. 2 . Gasoline service stations. C. Accessory Uses 1 Retail uses operated in conjunction with i, and incidental to permitted uses provided such uses are housed as a part of the building comprising the basic ,; operations. 10 : �I i; II 2 Accessory uses and buildings customarily appurtenant to a permitted use. 3 . For permitted uses hazardous substance land uses including on site hazardous waste treatment and/or � storage facilities which are not subject to cleanup permit rectuirements of Kent City Code Chapter 4. 19 and which do not iaccumulate more than 5,000 ounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any combination thereof at any one time on site, Isubiect to the provisions of Section 15 08. 050 , except off- site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage facilities which are not permitted in this district. 4 :: are are facilities operated in conjunction iiwith a permitted use. D. Conditional Uses 1. Retail commercial uses. 2 . Hotels and motels. 3 Group Homes Class 1-A 1-B, 1-C 2-A, 2-B, 2-C and 3 . 4 . General conditional uses listed in Section 15. 08 . 030. ... �j E. Development Standards 1. Minimum Lot. 10 , 000 square feet. I: 2 . Maximum site coverage. Seventy five (75) 1percent. 3 . Setbacks. No minimum setback is required. i; When a rear and/or side yard abuts a residential district, !: then a 20 foot rear and/or side yard setback may be required. See the downtown design review criteria outlined in Section j; 15. 09 . 048 . 4 . Height Limitation. No maximum height limit An required See the downtown design review criteria outlined An Section 15. 09. 048 . 5. The landscaping requirements of Chapter 15. 07 shall apply. F. Signs The sign requirements of Chapter 15.06 shall apply. G. Off-street Parking I' The off-street parking requirements of Chapter 15. 05 shall apply. it 11 I �I I I I .r„ H. Development Plan Review Development Plan approval is required, as provided in Section 15 09. 010. I. Downtown Design Review The downtown design review requirements of Section 15 09 048 shall apply. Section 4 . Section 15. 05. 070 of the Kent City Code is amended to read as follows outlined below. These H regulations are interim until such time as a Downtown Parking jlManagement Plan is approved by the City Council. I; 1! 15. 05.070 OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL AND DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISE DISTRICTS I I ( Purpose: It is the purpose of this section to recognize the pedestrian-oriented nature of downtown activities while also :. recognizing the need for off-street parking facilities to eliminate traffic congestion. For the purpose of regulating i, off-street parking, there shall be two divisions of the :' Downtown Commercial Enterprise District, one for the area west ,! of the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, and one for the area east of the tracks. BG-3: and PE y "hese divislens steal �,. 1' be delineated the f f eial $ening ma i' rr i l ^ nt in I, thr9G, Dewntewn Gem.-ere-al Zening distriet. See Seetien •1 5Q5-64G fer- residential par-le-ing requirements A. DC i Blvisleffi District No off-street parking shall be required in this I� divisien district excepting that one Parking space Per unit is required for multifamily residential development. No more than three off-street surface parking spaces Per 1 000 square �Ifeet of gross floor area are permitted for non-residential ;. development This parking maximum does not apply to '' structured Parking. The DC 1 Divislen District is the core area of downtown which should be pedestrian oriented. In addition, the property owners in the DCE Divislen District :; have provided off-street parking through LID assessments. �i it j B. DICE District West of the BN Tracks -� Off-street parking shall be provided and shall be in accordance with the provisions of this chapter; except 11there may be a fifty (50) percent reduction from the parking standard requirements contained in Section 15. 05. 040; and II except that those Properties in the DCE zone who Paid into i� 12 I I i, .I I� i I ! it y i I f Parkins LID 260 shall be exempt from off-street parkins requirements. One parking space per unit is required for all multifamily residential development No more than three off- street surface parking spaces per 1 000 square feet of gross floor area are permitted for non-residential development. This surface parking maximum does not apply to structured Parkingg. C. DCE District East of the BN Tracks off-street Parking shall be provided and shall :jbe in accordance with the provisions of this chapter; except (there may be a twenty-five (25) percent reduction from the !!„Parking standard requirements contained in Section 15. 05. 040. ! l 5 parking spaces per unit are required for multifamily ;; residential development No more than three off-street ,parking spaces per 1, 000 suare feet of cross floor area are q Permitted for non-residential development. This surface parking maximum does not apply to structured parking. Section 5. Subsection E of Section 15. 05. 040 of the .(Kent City Code is hereby repealed. Section 6 . Subsection C of Section 15 . 06. 050 of the 'iKent City Code is amended as follows: C. Signs Permitted in Downtown Commercial and Downtown Commercial Enterprise Districts Section 7. Subsection E (1) of Section 15. 06. 050 of ithe Kent City Code is amended is follows: E. Signs Permitted in Industrial Districts 1. Aggregate sign area. The aggregate sign area for lots in MA and M1 shall not exceed one-half (1/2) Isquare foot for each foot of street frontage, in M2 and DLM shall not exceed three-fourths square foot of street frontage; land in M3 shall not exceed one (1) square foot for each foot of street frontage; in no case shall the aggregate sign area liexceed one-half (1/2) square foot for each foot of street : frontage on a corner lot. The permitted signs enumerated (! below shall be subject to the total aggregate sign area. Section 8 . Subsection J of Section 15 . 07 . 060 of the Kent City Code is amended as follows: 'i I 'i 13 I I I! 1 I I I J. Downtown Commercial , DC 3 The- perimeter of r ' � +�n� a �1. A minimum of three (3) feet of landscaping j Ito screen off-street parking areas placement of which shall i{ be determined through the downtown design review process outlined in Section 15. 09. 048 . the sidewalle ajAL4he shall be landseaped with er it F 1 ........... . die �j 32 . Street trees in accordance with the HOfficial Tree Plan shall be planted. Section 9. The Kent City Code is amended to add , Subsections R and S to Section 15 . 07 . 060 as follows: R. Downtown Commercial Enterprise, DCE 1. The perimeter of properties abutting a ; residential district shall be landscaped to a minimum depth of Illen (10) feet. 2 . A minimum of three (3) feet of landscaping to screen off-street parking areas placement of which shall Iibe determined through the downtown design review process ;outlined in Section 15. 09 . 048 . 3 . Street trees in accordance with the ,'Official Tree Plan shall be planted. S. Downtown Limited Manufacturing, DLM 1. The perimeter of properties abutting a ;,residential district shall be landscaped to a minimum deth of �iten (10) feet. j; 2 . A minimum of three (3) feet of landscaping Ito screen off-street parking areas placement of which shall 'ibe determined through the downtown design review process outlined in Section 15.09 . 048. 3 . Street trees in accordance with the ',Official Tree Plan shall be planted. Section 10. The Kent City Code is amended to establish a new Section 15. 09 . 048 , Downtown Design Review to , read as follows: 15 . 09. 048 DOWNTOWN DESIGN REVIEW it �j A. Purpose and Scope. j; 1. Downtown Design Review is an administrative process the purpose of which is to implement and give effect 14 I � I i I .A. I� .i 1 w.r o the Downtown Plan, its policies or Parts thereof, throu h lon vt uCai4i. criteria t d gign ter; a for novel onment� within the ILhe dCiOT7t (Downtown Planning Area which is bounded by State Route 167 to the west James Street to the north Jason/Titus/Central (Avenue to the east and Willis Street to the south. The area 'is shown on the map below: I� Downtown Planning Area i� ii j SRN !TSMITH ST SMITH c MAMRI!!M 4J x jl u XECMCR !T ~ G04E ST a '1 s a i OERN 77 MRCLTM ST i GUISERSOX WILL S !T _ �. SEATTLE S' u CROP ST It is the intent of the City that this process will serve to laid applicants in understanding the principal expectations of ,,the City concerning development in the Downtown Planning Area (;and encourage a diversity of imaginative solutions to ;development through the review and application of the design criteria described herein. These criteria have been formulated to ensure that the design siting and construction !'of development will provide a quality pedestrian oriented ;urban environment in..a manner consistent with established land !use policies the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code of the 'cCif 2 . The adoption of design criteria is an 1'element of the City' s regulation of land use, which is { statutorily authorized. The downtown design review process !!adopted herein is established as an administrative function ' delecgated to the Planning Department pursuant to RCW 35A. jTherefore in implementing the Downtown Design Review process, the Planning Director may adopt such rules and procedures as !are necessary to provide for review of proposed projects. 15 ij 1 I +I II � .1. nlr I 3. Development in the Downtown Commercial (DC) Downtown Commercial Enterprise (DCE) and Downtown Limited Manufacturing (DLM) zoning districts within the Downtown Planning Area shall be sublect to the provisions of this section. 4 . A_volications for multifamily development in !the DC DCE and DLM zoning districts shall not be subject to the provisions of Section 15 09 045 - Administrative Design 1,Review. I �I 5. The downtown design review process is distinct from the Multifamily Design Review process set forth iin Section 15 09 047 Applications for multifamily ;' development within the DC DCE and DLM zoning districts shall !be subiect to the provisions of Section 15. 09 . 047 in addition :, to the provisions of this section except as provided in i15 09 047 (3) However, the provisions of this section shall prevail in cases where a conflict may arise between the requirements of these sections. B. Application and Review Process. The Downtown ;! Design Review process is administrative and is conducted as ;; part of the permit review process The applicant must make application for the design review process on forms provided by lithe Planning Department Upon receipt of an application for �; desicm review, the Planning Director shall circulate the ;ice lication to the Public Works Director Building Officiate : and the City Administrator for review. Prior to issuing a i1final decision the Planning Director shall review any icomments submitted for consideration. In the administration iof this process the Planning Department may develop supplementary handbooks for the public which _ shall " pictorially illustrate and provide additional guidance on the ,' forth in subsection C interpretation of the criteria set herein. ' C. Design Review Committee There is hereby ilestablished the Downtown Administrative Design Review Committee which shall make all final decisions on ! applications for downtown design review. The Committee shall 1be comprised of 3 members who shall be appointed by the City's Planning Director under the authority delegated to him/her under RCW 35A and shall serve at the pleasure of the ', Director. g The Plannin Director shall by administrative ; rule establish the rules of procedure for the Committee, iwhich shall be made available to the public upon publication. 16 �. i I I' i 1 D. Design Review Criteria. The Downtown Administrative Design Review Committee shall use the following i jcriteria in the evaluation and/or conditioning of applications j! under the downtown design review process: i 1. Site Design (; a. The site plan conforms with the !; Pedestrian Plan Overlay frontage requirements for Class_A and Class B streets as included in the Administrative guidelines of the Planning Department. b. The site Plan conforms with the maximum setback requirements as specified by the Pedestrian i Plan Overlay. C. The site Plan Provides for a zero setback for properties abutting Meeker Street and First Avenue within the DC zoning district. d. The site plan restricts the number of (' curb cuts necessary to meet automobile circulation I' requirements. e. Off street parking areas are located to the rear or side of buildings and are well lit. f. The site plan provides for sidewalks and Pedestrian corridors in both Public rights of ways and ;! privately owned areas. j e Pedestrian corridors outside of ;. buildings are clearly marked and well lit. 'i h. Pedestrian throughways are Provided in long buildings. i The site plan provides for semi private and/or private useable open space for any development with 'a residential component. 2 . Landscape Design I' I; a. The landscape Plan provides for jlextensive landscaping of large Parking areas or other open j! areas which can be seen from the street or other Pedestrian j oriented area. i 17 I. I, � II i i i I� b. The landscape elan enhances pedestrian activities for any setback or other open space areas which are being provided on the site. c. The landscape plan enhances any i private and/or semiprivate open spaces which are being ; Qrovided for multifamily residential units. 3 . Building Design Ia. Building floor area above four (4) stories in height is setback as appropriate to maintain human !, scale. fi b. Buildings in the DC zoning district are designed to be compatible with the existing historic '', buildings in terms of bulk scale, and cornice line. c. Buildings in the DC zoning district provide cover for pedestrians such as awnings along the length !; of any facade abutting a sidewalk. d. Building facades facing a public fright of way or other pedestrian oriented space minimize blank walls by providing windows and/or providing an interesting design feature. e. Windows make up the greatest ercenta a of the street level facade area to minimize blank walls in the DC zoning district. E. APPEALS. The decision of the Downtown Administrative Design Review Committee to approve condition or reiect any application under the downtown design review_ process is final unless an appeal is made to the Hearing ; Examiner within ten (10) days of either the issuance of the Committee's conditional approval or rejection of any application under this Section Appeals to the Hearing Examiner shall be as set forth in K.C.C. Chapter 2 . 54. The ' decision of the Hearing Examiner shall be final . unless an ! appeal is made to the City Council within ten days after the ; Hearing Examiner' s decision Said appeal shall be in writing to the City Council and filed with the Clerk. i 18 I li I� a.. it I I I 1 i i i l ,i it i; j ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to land use and zoning, amending the City's official zoning map by adding the new Downtown Commercial Enterprise and Downtown Limited Manufacturing districts, and by changing the zoning boundaries of the Downtown Commercial, General Commercial, Commercial Manufacturing, Office, Limited Industrial, Medium Density Multifamily Residential, and High Density Multifamily Residential Districts within the Downtown Planning Area. WHEREAS, the Kent City Council adopted a resolution amending and updating the Kent Downtown Plan and Downtown Plan Map on May 2 , 1989 ; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has the statutory authority to amend its Zoning Code pursuant to RCW 35A. 63 ; and WHEREAS, the Kent City Council approved a Planning Department Work Program to implement the goals, policies, and objectives set forth in the amended Kent Downtown Plan through revisions in the Kent Zoning Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department conducted public workshops on August 2 , 1990, and October 25, 1990, to solicit ' comments from the public relating to downtown zoning issues; and WHEREAS, the Kent Planning Commission held extensive public hearings on the proposed downtown zoning revisions, beginning in March of 1991, through February of 1992 ; and i', i I � i I WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted to recommend to j the City Council the Revised Downtown Zoning Program, with ;; modifications, on February 24, 1992 ; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted workshops on the !'', proposed downtown zoning on March 30 and May 19, 1992, and unanimously adopted the Planning Commission's recommendation, with Imodifications, on June 2 , 1992 ; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The zoning boundaries of the City of Kent : official zoning map are hereby amended as reflected in Exhibit A (Revised Downtown Zoning Map) which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference, and the Kent Planning Director is hereby authorized and directed to incorporate the amendments to the official zoning map as set forth in Exhibit A. Section 2 . A copy of the official zoning map, as amended herein, shall be filed with the City Clerk and retained in the office of the Planning Department and made available for public inspection upon request. Section 3 . This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage, approval and ; publication as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR i ji 2 I( i I it Nil 111M ■ Nil 1I MIN=- V4Nil 1■ Mil ��I■ iii�- ■■ _ �■1111�11 ��__ milli _L. _■ ■� ■�■n■i�� :`.�■ I�1■ 1111111 illl■ 111�111 1■J � 1��� 11� 1 �; 1111111�1 111 11■ �- � � 111 I 1 1 ■ 111�� . � 1®Ii1i - • `� - � � ■11 ■1111 1 � IIIB Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SOOSETTE CREEK LIFT STATION------------ 2. SUMMARY ST MENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, ceptance of the bill of sale and warranty agreement Aubmitted by Kent Pump Station Cost Sharers for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 2, 098 feet of sewer main extension, 2, 625 feet of force main and a lift station constructed for the Lindental development in the I vicinity of 116th Ave. S.E. and S.E. 266th Street with release of the cash bond supplied for these improvements to be in i conjunction with acceptance of the Lindental plat. / 3 . EXHIBITS: Excerpt from the Public Works Committee minutes, memo from Director of Public Works and vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: 2-0 vote Public Works Committee (White absent) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3E DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 10, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS (COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM` '1"`lJ� RE: SOOSETTE CREEK LIFT STATION The developer of the Lindental development has completed the Soosette Creek Lift station and is requesting acceptance of the sewer main extension, the force main and the lift station constructed for the development. We are recommending acceptance of the bill of sale and warranty agreement for continuous operation and maintenance of the sewer extension, force main and lift station; however, release of the cash bonds supplied for these improvements will be in conjunction with acceptance of the Lindental plat. A 1 � n O Q T73^ff''r.. a oew-,n-:'ram ..ay.,-...�-...--^—, :,•—. 6 E < Til STSE rt I ( 5 `1 a I d E'E7BiEr1't AO CT .s,.,..1 ....... Sit L n d r'1 9 _ tlU „ 7� SE 7`31K Sl > IS 1 4 T > < s z"�.ea rn ST ST SE_ (<71D,U IST ( f 4P 1S SE :777HD � r"�-i�'2 (vj �f.r >r I SE L 773T1i ,' u ILE i ; T:F R , M J , SF 7 fly( sr _I'a,r, i,l rnFc i tt r r s ft F�t Yi ,1,i r:t7 ;,jt P�qK.•, i 7 �1� 55 + 1 17M ` WCI I T'I* I j T.L. 57 T. 80 �7 777 --� j Y REVISED HORZ. r_ CCA 770N OF Alf.f 1. EEC)G � Public Works Committee June 17, 1992 Page 3 Soosette Creek Lift Station Wickstrom explained that the Lindental development required construction of a lift station. The construction is complete and the developer is requesting the City accept same for operation and maintenance. The committee unanimously recommended acceptance. James Street and Russell Road Jim Bennett asked about the timing of the plat that would affect the traffic patterns at this intersection. Gill responded that the plat meeting is this month at which the conditions affecting the plat road improvements and closures will be discussed. He added that he thought the developer had intentions of trying to start construction this summer. Jim Bennett requested that we temporarily address the problem -he brought up at the last Committee meeting about trucks turning around at the end of James and causing the ground to give way. Gill stated we could take a look at what types of interim measures might resolve the concerns. VV' C/ Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: DALLY TYNES APARTMENTS BILL OF SALE 2. SUMMARY ST�EMENT: As recommended by the Public Works`. Committee, cceptance of the bill of sale and warranty agreement s bmitted by Kent-Kangley Associates for approximately 1, 640 feet of water main extension, 1,705 fee of sanitary sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of 116 h Ave. S.E. and Kent-Kangley and release of the cash bond aft r expiration of the one-year maintenance period. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director and vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: 3-0 Vote of Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ..)(_ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: 3 Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Age da Item No. 3F� DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 26, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: BILL OF SALE - DALLY TYNES APARTMENTS Water and sewer main extensions were constructed for the Dally Tynes Apartments on 116th Avenue S.E. and Kent Kangley. The developer is requesting the City accept the improvements for operation and maintenance and that his cash bond be released after expiration of the one year maintenance period. We would so recommend. REITEN '. Cfan S fi,.x•.a � �` oa { h ^oogZ a s # otl^ o� 4om 5 1a Z�',�r"I '. y i S e 1 � s Y „ r1i a C L a F ✓� ✓• _ ) 3 106TH AVE SE y Li y � 108TH AVE SE t,s : r, a 104TH AVE SE rn u. in m z 1 C_' 111 TH AVE y VE 113T 'E m I9TH AVE;'.= L 114TH AYE SE rn S ti rn . L15TH AVE 5E 2 T ` 1157H PL SE 118TH x n I17TH AVE SE P SE a 118 Z S N 118TH RVE-SE N m VE 18TH A P ^' m J c N N N r • x l I4TH m i m N t an m '^ m PL SE N r i• p t u, 120TH ry ZZY s^ y m w Jo 2a �N m 1215 y 2Sgl m x v tryn PL 5 122NO z 123RO 0 Z N y 124TH RYE SE 124TH R'I 12SE 1 �— N N N rn m � SE N ry x w m Ni N s x t na 2 126TH PL N192 H 127TH RYE SE -� m 120TH AVE SE x '24T' 128TH PL Sf 124TH� PL SE DALLY TYNES APARTMENTS m �— aE m a 13V1H AVE SE Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 1992 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: ARCO AM/PM MINI MARKET BILL. OF SALE 2 . SUMMARY STA MENT: is recommended by the Public orks Committeellepceptance of the bill of sale submitted b Atlantic Richfield Company for continuous operation and maintena ce of approximately 430 feet of street improvements and 116 fe t of storm sewer improvements constructed at West Valley High ay and So. 180 and release of the cash bond after expiration of the one-year maintenance period. I<_ 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director and vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: 3-0 vote of Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO___.X__ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3G I. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 25, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMM TTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM ,0 RE: BILL OF SALE - ARCO AM/PM MINI MARKET Street and storm sewer improvements were constructed for the Arco AM/PM Mini Market at West Valley Highway and S. 180th. The owner is requesting the City accept the improvements for operation and maintenance. It is our recommendation that we do so and release the cash bond after the one year maintenance period. 11-- - --- Su 415T ST nR If a W a V., 0 / SH L13RC ST J f S .- '182ND.S V": TOGO _. S 1887H ST GLACIER ST W _ 5 168TH ST ' ° i S MTH ST S 196TH:ST - 190TH ST _ "•ti> !. 'W S 192N0 - LT S 192NC ST S194TH ST ' { 196TH ST • . c S 196TH ST':'. - i c o. ,Y C: S Cli w w / S //2CC a S 200TH ST - f- to 202140 ' $ 64TH ST y YI J� W x V ZF S' 208TH ST INvt' f1Ef14SPRCE „� � w - 0 TH _ r$7 206 TH 5'. x k ARCO AM/PM MINI MARKET ti 21ux s7, SCH04L, .; =•• t� t >artT � �7 o f r•"� �efs x � f :� a � �"ti � ... g'216TH,ST - :' Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 . 1992 Category—Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WEST VALLEY MASONjY..BILL_ PF SALE AND LATECOMER AGREEMENT 2. SUMMARY ST EMENT: rAsrecommended by the Public`Korks Committee, cceptance of the bill of sale and warranty. agreement bmitted by B.G. McElderry for continuous op ation and maintenance of approximately 309 feet of sanitary se r extension constructed in the vicinity of So. 228th and We t Valley Highway, waiver of the one-year maintenance period ith immediate release of cash bond and authorization for staff to prepare and the Public Works Director to sign a Latecomer Agreement for future connections to this main. r 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director and vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: 3-0 Vote of Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3H DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 25, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: BILL OF SALE AND LATECOMER AGREEMENT - WEST VALLEY MASONRY The owner of West Valley Masonry extended sanitary sewer to serve his property north of S. 228th and west of West Valley Highway. He is requesting the City accept the sewer extension for operation and maintenance. Since the main has been constructed and in operation since 1988 , we are recommending we accept the extension, waive the one-year maintenance period, and release the bonds. The owner is also requesting the City implement a latecomer agreement for any future connections to the main. There are four properties which could connect and it is estimated the latecomer fee would be approximately $0. 0753 per square foot. It is recommended that staff be authorized to prepare and the Public Works Director to sign a latecomer agreement for this sewer main. )UN0A,?,Y 1111E 8 Ar`1Cv'� 5 r NU a !\' , r�F:t 4�r�SED UPON TflE DAT t1 CITY OF KE1NT SNc,)RZ Pl1JT NO . SpC 7(v 17 � A•F • IqO • 7gO(o►2-07S6 (� S. Z t2TN ST. Lo J p y 19 Q pP � S►TE 3 V) Z > T N W W Y , 5 Q 3 S • 2 Z BT H ST. � r Ln S. 22$ Q n > :9 K�NT . � 3 _Q s Q r 2 2 H fi J` w_ MEEKEK VICINITY MAP . h1 .T.S. v 10 ly go m 70 35 33 ~ � 'T ' *| Ile- Iv 14 ------ -----' --- N Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: ROBINSON SEWER EXTENSION LATECOMER AGREEMENT L 2 . SUMMARY ST EMENT: As recommended by the Public Wo3�cs Committee, tAuthorization for staff to prepare and the Di ector of Public Works to sign a Latecomer Agreement for future connections to the sanitary sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of 94th Ave. So. and So. 232nd Street. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: 3-0 Vote of Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO)_ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 31 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 24, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM �\j RE: LATECOMER AGREEMENT - ROBINSON SEWER EXTENSION The developer of the sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of 94th Avenue S. and S. 232nd Street has requested the City implement a latecomer agreement so that she can recover some of the costs involved. There are eleven lots which could connect to this new sewer line. We estimate the latecomer charge to each would be approximately $3 , 332 . Five of these lots would only be charged half the fee since, if they wish to connect, they would be required to pump into the system. We are recommending that staff be authorized to prepare and the Public Works Director to sign a latecomer agreement for this sanitary sewer. I. ' c Lot 2 09 !� 0 � 5 � 0A0 � , ss cl? SCALE I = l00 --. IP 77 F;,& I dB9 a7-s9 ,a= 5 J IpO 5pF ^•�,; o r 0 0 $J j��..w� pd� Y ah `j " o: ias Lot I ° u;?" )fir 'gyp° aC to 4y00 to '41 �'�to? I� 5p LAG 12 M1 Iso .` • - e_ �,., ,.; :,p _s .:�} la° Gas.st.v S 232ND ST aaSThp-l+3'i7 �te4Yr �:� w....• --'----- 3Gz./6 ..'- /IS 80 .�-- u5 _ B3 yp�• 70 —70 I 70 I I nl 1\m T N N vll ,Nt A00 5 30)0�0 0 9 90.0 ta0 ` `J 50 ,5°�G0 'S°� 'go oc° q _ tip°� ^ m O53 i ---- 1001: HS 87 TO x° to . 10 1 80 NH9 'sC-5eE �4100(f) ° 33 o- 28 ! 6 27 P 0 1 32 N 31 m 30 29 N Boieo Z. ° 0 v pb q,9 0 a 90380 200 9; , 0 ItAll � 3P.t5,0008 \055too - 100�;0 11 Gi500 a29° r � )co � \0 C�rO 0� °0 52.4 so o 5 to 3 a. jt 0' t e ra35 ^ ^ Gp9 94TH CT S t S 233R0 w.[5 H3GG 9001 4291 R'rS A� R.ZS 21 q 22 ,3 3057 ZI\0 m 6y� a II Z040 1260 z2M1OP p2O a'^ o0y2O^ cr. t56 p° a n p,0 P 2 vo a220 ?0 9 23 \0 \0 9g90 ,�, m3 w ,7 ° opz0 ,t' 3 9qR 4�0a N o0 °y0° 9 1c°aZ')° e YW- SE Ai LN. SxLLO' s�-NW-SG ___ Q 41 90 a9 9pa3o..\\0b° V Ff x5 vO1.2149/94�96 ' 2 ` 809 0 s3 3255 LOT 3 ON N tQ LOT 2 c l'0 000 0 = 6 ° e o0 op a d �y 8 p o 17 ILO M (N p0 m \t° p V 0 1c t0 j0 to 00 ro �O 851 d5 O dq4 L9 2 a c '�000 5 eo Iv 9e,S °°20 .ss fps _ ° ^�i v 0 "'a' 0110 v S 4G 5, 9'I H005° •� `60G MCt �(k �"�_ N o .1 ^_ -� p00 70p 0 ^ eF.YO r.r r .59' ap:` S a 0 .023Q "...'' LOT 2 �° 0 m pi m z1 3q P 95TH "<5 V 12 ez c TH PLr r °565•p ��I n p N s011041 7 -00 CT Spite 440a t)r a°IZpp I`7 LOT ! Q p° 'Voo P i J" V ty LLB y95 8 13 N 14 Iss- 9 ` Oo i �. 1U A'Ij )0 LOT I —i.-afsc-ssE s<a is c^'j 159�p 0 00 IIO 8 yqp ✓e-.r•ee 0'�p ,2�090 0' 7 0i 30 0,40 ......... .. Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 . 1992 Category Consent Calendar C1. SUBJECT: SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1993-1998 s recommended b , 2 . SUMMARY ST TEMENT: A y the Public Works Committee, uthorization to set July 21 as date for public, hearing on the City' s Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 1993-1998. f- 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, draft of Six Year TIP, excerpt from 6/17 Public Works Committee 4. RECOMMENDED BY: 2-0 vote of Public Works Committee (White absent) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 24, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM RE: SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN Attached is a draft of the Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan for your review and comment. A public hearing has been scheduled for July 21st at which time we will be requesting adoption of the Plan. CITY OF KENT SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 1993 - 1998 1 WASHINGTON Don E. Wickstrom, P.E. Director of Public Works CITY OF KENT, WASIUNGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET .� 1993 TIIROUGII 1998 PROJECT LISTING ANNUAL ELEMENT 1993 FIRST YEAR ANNUAL ELEMENT 1993 1 272nd/277th Street - Auburn Way to Kent-Kangley Road 2 196th/200th Street Corridor Project (West Leg) 3 192nd/196th Street Corridor Project (Middle leg) 4 Metro Park and Ride Lot 5 Canyon Drive Median Barrier 6 S.E. 260th Street at 104th Avenue S.E. Intersection Improvements 7 76th Ave S. at S. 212th Street Intersection Improvements 8 Reith Road/Meeker Street at Kent-Des Moines Road Intersection Improvements 9 72nd Ave S. at S. 212th Street Intersection Improvements 10 Central Avenue at S. 259th Street Intersection Improvements 11 Central Avenue at SR 167 Signal Improvements 12 Central Avenue - Willis Street to Smith Street 13 72nd Ave S. - S. 194th Street to S. 196th Street 14 S. 212th Street - West Valley Hwy. to SR 167 15 ******DELETED****** 16 S.E. 256th Street - Kent-Kangley Road to 116th Ave. S.E. 17 Crow Road By-Pass (SR 516) 18 ******DELETED****** 19 64th Ave. S. - S. 216th Street to S. 226th Street 20 James Street Safety Improvements (incl. 100th Ave. S.E. at S. 240th Street Signal Improvements) 21 ******DELETED****** 22 VMS Upgrade 23 Neighborhood Traffic Control Program SECOND/THIRD YEAR 1994 - 1995 24 Lincoln Avenue at James Street Traffic Signal 25 West Valley Hwy. - S. 180th Street to S. 189th Street 26 James Street at Central Avenue Intersection Improvements 27 Kent-Kangley Road at lllth Avenue S.E. Intersection Improvements 28 Smith Street at 4th Avenue Intersection Improvements 29 Willis Street at 4th Avenue Signal Modifications (1995) 30 James Street - Jason Avenue to 94th Avenue S. 31 Lind Avenue - S. 180th Street to East Valley Hwy. SIX YEAR"TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET 1993 THROUGH 1998 PROJECT LISTING Page -2- FOURTH/FIFTH/SIXTH YEAR 1996, 1997, 1998 32 S. 224th Street/S. 228th Street Corridor Project (West Leg) 33 S. 192nd Street/S. 196th Street Corridor Project (East Leg) 34 N. Central Avenue at Smith Street Intersection Improvements 35 94th Avenue South - Canyon Drive to James Street 36 248th Street - 94th Ave S.E. to 116th Ave. S.E. 37 84th Avenue South - S. 212th St. to SR 167 38 James Street at 104th Ave S.E. Acceleration Lanes 39 West Meeker Street - 64th Ave. S. to West Valley Highway 40 72nd Avenue S. - S. 196th Street to S. 200th Street 1993-1999 6 YEAR TRANSPORTA7ION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM JROJECT SUMMARY City/County Vert. Washir.e_;er Hearinc Date--------------. City No 0615 Adoption Date -------------- Coun'v No. 17 Resolution Nc.------ _________________________ ---------------------- 0 PROJECT IDEN'TI'ICATION PROJcOT COSTS IN THOUSANDS 0'r DOLLAR° DESCRIPTION 0= WORK OSA GATION FUN'CiNC SO:'RCE !TOTA: c SCHEDULE ----------------------------- !Street name c. number. ! Y E A R IFEOERA: ! !niNDc Cc. .cad name or number. ! 1993 1994 1995 '95-'vz term ... . bec"nri & end. st 212 3r :.` ore 'A.".- iA!Lc z y Oesc. .oe wcrx tc ce done. ) !Anil 5t'n AMT cram; No 15 272nd Street/ S. 277t.. S:reet orrice ! 4161, ' 42E° ' 652E ! 23:_ E11 TiA' 8140 . ip2K . Auburn Way to Kent-ta.n.clev Rcad ! ! ! !Construct a new 'cc^/`ive :ane roacwav �. .x Aubu^^! ! wav to the ten:-ta ,1:ev Rcao. oleo . !dricce ac css the Greer. R've-. an. a .ra-'�_ s ra' system at ,r= .. tErs of .he !tier:-Kano ev Roac. . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 !S.'.96.^/5.209t.. Street Co . . on .feet 1 �5o i 2233 290r 32 . , iA! Dr. is Roac r,es: '/a "way !Widen 5.200t.. Street .-c.n 0 z Rcac Russai . Rcac. an,. .-ec^anre'-'ze 'R:sse';' :Rcac; !c i95: S:. ee- 7e G^ec" K'VE" Va'ilev _ ^way. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15.192.^.d/5.1,9 to S:^eE: Ce r c or^ ec: 9;2 179E 5032 1 °3-. ^:. '.?.A! 7C.n 9jrn !west Valley Hic^wav East Va `.ev . -_^way COCSt.^J�t a new '•.gin/'';yE 12^E "acwav, .cave^e^t w^den;nc^tc c 1R5t^ Street from West Vailey n4c^way 72 Ave c a new d .dgei !over the U^;or Pac ic an :Rai„cac .racxs. an: a tear. .- sicnaiiza: cn syste! ! !at tre East Va'.inv rwv and 5.1.95t`` Street ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 !Metro Paris and Rice lot 111E ! 123" 102C T1A.f 4H 240C . .Excansic. - the cresen.t Me:.., facil;ty METRO! ! Iccatec at SR516 an.. Mi tary Road tc accomcdzte ! :an addiz,cnal 2nn to 30D ve.n.icies. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- • arvx 0 ie Median zrr-:er !Extend the exist'.^n concrete m.E_lan barrier ! � 'canyon Drive. I. 1993-1993 6 YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEM`-NTT PROCR.AN OROJECT SUMMARY City/County Kent. Washincton, Hearin,- Date City No 0615 Adoption Date inty No. 1? Resolution No------ w PROJECT IDENTIFICATION' ! PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS p - • DESCRIPTION OF WORK OSLIGATION iFUNDING SOURCE !TOTAL ! SCHEDULE ------------------------------' y (Street name Icn number. Y E A R !FEDERAL ! !FUN'DS Co. read name or number. ! 1993 1994 1995 '95-'991 ! ! tera.in.i beeinr.inc & end. !1st 2nd 3rd 4.5 Pro-'A MT TLA!Locz'' y Descride work to be done.; !Ann! 6th !AM cram! ! No !E!mt ! ! ! 5 !SE 250th Street at 104th Ave SE Inters=cticr ! 35C 2 0 U.ATi 142 ! 350 ! Imoroyements ! !Construct mine- wide-inc or 104t1', Ave EE to provid' ! !a seoarate left turn 'are cr. 104th .Ave SE. arc !instal) a new tra*Tic sicna-.;zzticn syste:r. ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 !75th .Aven.:e E at S 212th Street Intersect.-_ 5C 35 IST°.: :Ircrovements ! ! ! � !Reconstr ct the n2-rla zz:.-In on the s _.-ers: :and soutneest cc-ners of the interseoticn to - !co.nst. ct an ad...t?ona left tCrr Vane. .' . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'Rei ^ ... Road/ Meeks- Street at Ken.-Des Mc nes 12 ISTA.: ? 5 .Road Intersect cn I^c^ove.^..er.ts . !Widen Reitn Roac/ Meeker Street. red n-t%uct t:ne 'ohan.n.eliz;nc isla.n.cs on he northwest. .._. .beast. ! !and southeast corners cf the ir.tersecticn: end !modify the trafr, s Cra;;z,t;cn castem. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 02nd Ave S. at S 212t Street Intersec:ion . 100 ! 03 ISTA! 17 . 100 11morovements ! !Widen caveient to cermit ccnst action a ri^^t 'turn lire on the northeast ce^ne^ c{ the inte" !secticn. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '0 !C t t S 5 h Street I ter -c` 190 ' 150 ISTAi 30 ! 90 2r�ra Avenue z 2 9t r2 n s_ .. . !Improve^ents ! ! 'Installatic:n, of a traffic ss -a'!;Zatice syste^. ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '1 'Central Avenue at SR 167 Traffic Sienal Improvemen! 40 ! 33 ISTA! 7 '. 40 ! !Construct imorcve.men•ts to the traffic s can.izati_. ! '.system(s; at the SR 167 ra.mcs to Central Avenue. ! ! ! 'Prclect ;ncludes rev?-ions tc provide eroteotive! ! ! !permissive :eft turn. ohasir.c, replacement o* the !WSDOT tra"ic signal contrc"�lers wit^ City of Kent: :s.ancard ecuipment, and ,..terco-r.ect.cc. ! t40 eLcMMA,i" City/County Sent, Was'ninctor hearine Date --------------- Ci•y No °5!C Adcor c^ "a -------------- Ceunty Nl^. Resolutio^ Nc. - 0 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION PRO.'E:.T COSTS IN THO115.0,95 OF DOLLARc DESCRIPTION OF WORK 05'-!GATION ! FUNDING SOUR:' 'TOTAL p SC:=EDUCE ---------------------------: t ° E A R !FEOERAi !c;IN:)C r (Scree name or number. ��� � • Co. road name cr number. 993 ice aa5 'a5-'Q3' termini beeinninc & enc. !'.st 2nc arc 4.5 Prc-!..0 TIA!LocaI ' v Describe work tc be done. !An.nl 5t^ A?IT c^ Nc !c m ! 12 !Centna Avenue - W4114s Stree; to Smit.. Stree: 749 52_ -!A! '.2! ! 749 ! !Widen .er.ral Avenue to orovice ler. 'aces !frcrr. Gcwe Street tO Titus S;re=_t. arc 7io,t t',.'r.. .?a.^.es a: :-nith Street and E Ocwe. a^.,. rec^nstruc:; !the tra= is sicnaiiz tior system a; tre Cent^a' :Avenue �:n:ersecticr. ;vita E. 3cwe. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "2rd AY9 _cuth - S. 191ti -c—ee: tc S. __... St-se: Sao :) : ' S^-0 r!0 new two lane roac'wav ,. S. 1CAtk Cr .... :treat. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... _ ree: Wes: Va uev rwav "_ ... Ave ..,, .... !W'ce^ eX's:. . cacwa'.' ._ ac9 u01i la es �Nes: .Valley -'wv to SR 157. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- __ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i5E 255... lczreet- ter..-Sar ev 3-lac tc 15: . Ave 55. 2900 i IA. .A- A-5l 2900 !WiC_.. =x'_: cacwav Kent-Ka^_ 'a'. ,cad , 5t. Ave H. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 !Crew :'cad iv-oass - 97tn Pl S. Mt- 5:roor. l000 5 '. :.A 00 ^ . !and 10_:^ Ave Sc W'cer ?X�_:. rca O'ways, .^O:" CarVcr /? t.^.rcuOn: !to tie ;Ke^t-Ka c.ev Road. :ra=. .. si na?. .-izat"'cn system at ;^e 109t:1- Ave SE 41-:?-section !wi,.. .na ?e.^.t-Ka^^ ev Roac. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- '993-1999 5 YEAR TRANSPORT.4T?C,N IMPROVE"ENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMAR" I City/County Kent. W'ashinctcr Hearin-, Date City No 0615 Adoption Date-------------- ntv No. 17 Resolution Nc.------ ------------------------------------------------ p PROJECT ID ENT IFIC.ATION ! PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS I I I DESCRIPTION OF WORK OBLIGATION ! FUNDING SOURCE TOTAL o SCHEDULE ------------------------------' (Street name Cr number. ! Y E A R !FEDERAL FUNDS Co. road name cr number. ! ?993 1994 i.995 '96-199! ! t termini beginninc & enc. !1st 2nd 3rd 4.5 ! Pro-!AMT TIA!La-,z y Describe work to be done.! !.Arnl 5 t h 'AMT gram! No !Elm t9 !64th Ave S. - S ,215th Street to S 225th Street ! 2200 ' ' ' 22'CO 2200 ' !Construct a new 'four lane roadway -"cm S 216th ! !Street to S 225th Street. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------- 20 !James Street Safety lmorovemerts - Central Avenue ! 300 ! 5C i 270 FEE; ! 3n "0 94th Ave S "-2 !ST.A! 3 ! 50 ! !Construct pedestrian safetv improvements ale ! .James Street (S 240th S'^.eel .. Cm Central Averse !tc 94" Avenue S. and mo.. 4y the -a`_ s;_na` C . .4zati-1- system at tre faxes Street intersection C' I !wit', in0th Ave SE. 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 !VMS Svstem Update 25 1 ion 17,r Ic-A.: 2E :Replace the Ci'v's :Master Traf, S;c^al Cc,,.. c' I ! !comouter wits a new ,.-..^.:outer syste.n. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=----------------------------- 23 !Neich-ornpCd Traf. .,. ContrC-' Pr ^am !City-Wide? 20 ! 2C ' 2" ' 60 Inc ucc 1 12 ' 120 : !"!edify local residential streets topromote sa`e !and approcriate levels of traffic flows. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 !Lincoln Avenue at James Street Tra{ ._ S na' . 13C' ! install traff4c sicralizatic-n system at .re 'Line—C'M Avenue at James Street irtersecticr.. i,r.o ! ! !vehicle detection. and interccnnectiCr. tp the ! ! ! !existinc pedestrian and railroad crossinc systems. ' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 25 !West Valley Hinhway - S lent., Street to S 189tc i i ! 27Cn 216C UATI 540 2700 . :Street ! !Widen West Valley Highway to seven lanes from So. ! ! '1 t et to cth c 1 i:- i . 80 h Street c e .. � 18 Street, r,c udi mcc . !ications to the traffic sicnalization systems. ! ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 !James Stree« !S 240t, Street! at Central Avenue ! ! 250 ! ! 208 ISTA.! 42 ! 25C . !Intersection Improvements ! 200 UA.T; 50 ! 250 ! 'Widen intersection to corstr._, a right turn lane ! ! ! or i stF-_und t^A*+ 1993-1998 6 YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ! PROJECT SUMMARY I City/County Kent, Washinatoc Hearing Date--------------- City No 0515 Adoption Date-------------- ! County No. 17 Resolution No. ! D PROJECT IDENTIFICATION ! PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS r i DESCRIPTION OF WORK OBLIGATION ! FUNDING SOURCE !TOTAL ! r SCHEDULE '------------------------------I (Street name or number. Y E A R !`EOERAL ! ! Co. road name or number. ! 1993 1994 1995 '96-'93! termini beginning & end. !1st 2nd 3rd A.5 Pro-!AMT TI.A!Lcca': v Oescrihe work to be dere.! !An r,l 5th !A>!T cram' Nc C1mt ----------------------------- 27 !Kent-Kancley Road at 111th Avenue SE 1-tersec:icr I I 1z I 1 12 ISTA: I 3 I 1S . !'.mcrovements ! !Instil' traffic sic^alizati0" inte.rcornecti07 cabtl t I !between the 104th Ave SE at SE 255th Street ! !and the Kent-Kanclev Roac at 111th Ave SE ! ! ';ntersecticr.s. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I� it' Street t A.4 s :�fl 1 jig :5 A! QQ :DD ! 28 m, n S eet z S -, Avenue .titer ecticn - !Imorovements ! ! Widen Smith Street anc S 4th Avenue to -,cvice ! ! !exc,,s4ve left tturn. lane channeNzat;cn. c"v tn. !ex;,s"nq traffic s qr,a;zaticn <-yste^ to , cvice ! !oro-ected left tinn dresi.r.c anc imorcve the retu... rag. , for rnc^t tu.,..;rc ve ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 29 !Will ; S« t S tt S° mcc". ,,_ ns! 25 ! „ iSTA! ! 4 25 �s Street a Avenue .a,al !Modify the exis:inc traf^c sicn2?'.za:4o- syste^.. :at the Willis Street (SR 516) at 5 4th Avenue !intersecticr. ! ! ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 !James Street J 4 c I 100n 0n T 1 n 1 . zres S, ee_ - zsgn Avenue to 9 th Ave 0 LA.. 1 0 . i'Wicen cavement to crovide exclusive ?eft -rr lane! !alone James Street from Jason Street to 94«:r. Ave S! ! ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3' !i in," Avenue - S ?oonn.. Stree, tc East, Iz?'ley Hwy SD^ 750 ?5DDA !Construct new five lane rcadwav frc,m S 189th St I I I !to East Valley hwv. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32 !S 224th/ S 228th Street Corr?der Pro,iec« 005a . 7646 TIA.! 1012 . 9558 . ! S 228th Street - Mi?itary Road to 5"-t^ Ave S ! ! Military Road - S 228th St to Kent-Des Moines ! !Construct a new four/five lane roadway ! ! ! 'M;1itary Read to 51t6 Ave S. including a new !across the Green River. and widen Military Rcac 'frc- S 228" Street to Kent-Des Moines Road. - I 1993-1998 6 YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECT SUMMARY City/County Kent, Washington Hearing Date City No 0615 Adooticn Date-------------- nty No. 17 Resolution NC.- ----------------- --------------- ------------ y _ _______________________________ _______________________________________ _______! P PROJECT IDENTIFICATION ! PROJECT COSTS IN THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS ! DESCRIPTION OF WORK OBLIGATION FUNDING SOURCE 'TOTAL o SCHEDULE ------------------------------i (Street name or rumber, v E A R !FEDERAL ! !FUNDS Co. road name or number, i 1993 1994 1995 '96-'98! ! ! t termini beginning & enc. !1st 2nd 3. d 4.5 ! Pro-!.AM? TIA!Loczl ! v Describe work to be cone.) !Ann 5th AM? grz:m1 ! Nc !Elmt ! ! 33 S 192nd ,6th Street Ccrricor Project _ o74c ! 6999 TIA! 175C ! 8749 : !East Valley Highway (SR 181) tc 92r.d Ave S ! ! !Construct new *our/rive lane roadway. inclucinc ! ! !pavement widening to S 196th Street from East Val'! !Hwy to 92nd Ave S, including a new bricce over the: ! ! !Valley Freeway (SR 157). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 !N Central .Avenue at Smith Stree: '.ntersecticn ! ` ". ! 499 IS?A! ! 101. 600 ! !!-oncvecen:s !Wicen cavemert to construct ar adciticna' lent ,_. . are. anc mo...fv the existing traffic signa'.izat._. ! !system. . ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- !94th Ave 5 - Canyon. Drive .., James Stree: 600 540 UAT' 150 E"0 !Widen 9::h Ave S tc a three lane rcacwav f. m. Jame: ! !Street to Canyon Drive. ! ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 'SE 248th Street - 9dth Ave SE to 11.6— Ave SE 2"0C 1509 UAT "C0 ' 200D ' !Widen SE 248:h Street to three lanes from 9"-th Ave: !SE to 116th Ave SE. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37 '84th Ave 5 - 5 21.2th Street to SR 157 2?50 ! : 729 UAT' !In ! 2150 ! !Widen 84t^ Ave S to seven lanes from S 212*1, Scree: ' ! ! !to 5R 157. ! ! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 38 !James Street at 104th Ave BE Acceleration Lanes ! ' 125 ! 25 150 ! !Construct an acceleration lane for eastbound traff! ! !along Jz.^es Street (S 240th Street) from 1.04th Ave! ! !SE. easterly a cistance of 600 fee:. I.. 05SCRIP?ICN CF WCR;'( JS; IC.Ai:ON "NON 'Cl'RCc „A: c grucDD.E •------------------------------: f Street name or %,�moe.r. -- .a .R ICcnpRA,, ! IS 1 Co. roac name or numbe-. ! 1993 199- 1925 '9E-'9@! ter^;ni oeeinnine & end. Is, a ` Pro-!A?1" !Al Local ! v Describe work to ue cone.` !A^n' 6— 1 AM, cram' No IT. --------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------------------- i9 !West Meeker Street - 54th Ave S to West Valley Hwv! 1500 ' 12n0 IIAiI 3n0 150n ! !Widen West Mee,�er Street to five lanes from 69tr ! ! ! !.Ave 5 to West Valley Hwy. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- d0 !12nd .Avenue S - 5 :96th Street tc S 290th Street ' S"0 Eln 510 !Ccnstruc, a nea two lane roadwav fr. , S 196t�, S—e! :te 5 200?h Street. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ?CTA; PRCJEC? CCS'S !29211 !26Gi. '32322 . :'.632 30:: 519 ! 3'262 6126'' ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 5.272nd /5.277th Street Corridor Project - Auburn Way to Kent-Kangley Road DESCRIPTION:Construct a new four/five lane roadway from Auburn Way to the Kent-Kangley Road, including a new bridge across the Green River, and a traffic signal system at the intersection with the Kent-Kangley Road. Project will include construction of full width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalk, street lighting, and street channelization. COST SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 1,979,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 3,351,000 Construction ................................. $ 10,780,000 TOTAL ............................................ $16,280,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) M.- TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 4,161,000 4,288,000 5,526,000 2,305,000 16,280,000 PROJECT 1 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: S.196th/S.200th Street Corridor Project - Orillia Road to West Valley Highway (WEST LEG - 192nd/196th/200th Street Corridor Project) DESCRIPTION:Widen S.200th Street from Orillia Road to Russell Road, and construct a new bridge over the Green River, and rechannelize Russell Road/S. 196th Street from the Green River to West Valley Hwy. Project will include the construction of full width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalk, street lighting, landscaping, grading, and channelization . NOTE: This is a joint project with King County and the City of Tukwila SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 837,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 767,000 Construction ................................. $4,001,000 TOTAL ............................................ $5,605,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) v TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 468,000 2,233,000 2,904,000 01000 5,605,000 PROJECT 2 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: S.192nd/S.196th Street Corridor Project - West Valley Highway (SR181) to East Valley Highway (MIDDLE LEG - S.192nd/S.196th/S.200th Street Corridor Project) DESCRIPTION: Construct new four/five lane roadway, including pavement widening to S. 196th Street from West Valley Highway to 72nd Ave. South, including a new bridge over the Union Pacific and Burlington Northern Railroad tracks, and a traffic signalization system for the intersection of East Valley Highway at S. 196th Street. Project will include the construction of full-width pavement, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, landscaping, and channelization. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 2,762,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 1,000,000 Construction ................................. $13,738,000 TOTAL ............................................ $17,500,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 941,500 1,706,000 6,032,000 8,820,000 17,500,000 PROJECT 3 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET .a PROJECT: Metro Park and Ride Lot DESCRIPTION: Expansion of the present Metro facility located at SR516 and Military Road to accommodate an additional 200 to 300 vehicles SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 400,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $2,000,000 TOTAL ............................................ $2,400,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, METRO PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ Sth ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 1,116,000 1,284,000 2,400,000 PROJECT 4 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Canyon Drive Median Barrier DESCRIPTION: Extend the existing concrete median barrier on Canyon Drive SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ TOTAL ............................................ $ FUNDING SOURCE(S) PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ Sth ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL PROJECT 5 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: SE 260th Street at 104th Avenue SE Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Construct minor widening on 104th Ave SE to provide a separate left turn lane on northbound 104th Avenue SE, and install a new traffic signalization system. Project will include the construction of pavement, curbs and gutters, and sidewalks. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 52,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 298,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 350,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 350,000 350,000 PROJECT 6 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 76th Avenue S. at S. 212th Street Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct the channelization on the southeast and southwest comers of the intersection to permit the construction of an additional northbound left turn lane. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 8,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 42,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 50,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 50,000 50,000 PROJECT 7 I. CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET r,. PROJECT: Reith Road/ Meeker Street at Kent-Des Moines Road Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Widen Reith Road/ Meeker Street; reconstruct the channelizing islands on the northwest,northeast, and southeast corners of the intersection; and modify the traffic signalization system. Project will include pavement widening, and channelization modifications. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering $ 5,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 10,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 15,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 15,000 15,000 PROJECT 8 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 72nd Ave. S at S 212th Street Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION:Widen pavement to permit construction of a right turn lane on the northeast corner of the intersection. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 20,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 80,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 100,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ Sth ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 100,000 100,000 PROJECT 9 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Central Avenue at S 259th Street Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Installation of traffic signalization system. Project includes installation of street lighting, and channelization modification. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 14,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 166,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 180,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 180,000 180,000 PROJECT 10 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Central Avenue at SR 167 Traffic Signal Improvements DESCRIPTION: Construct improvements to the traffic signalization system(s) at the SR 167 ramps to Central Avenue. Project includes revisions to provide protective/permissive left turn phasing, replacement of the WSDOT traffic signal controllers with City of Kent standard equipment, interconnection to the City's Master Traffic Control System, and interconnection to the adjacent traffic signals at S. 224th Street and S. 228th Street SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 12,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 28,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 40,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) -� ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 40,000 40,000 PROJECT 11 I. CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Central Avenue - Willis Street to Smith Street DESCRIPTION: Widen to provide left turn lanes from Gowe Street to Titus Street, and right turn lanes at Smith Street and East Gowe, and reconstruct traffic signalization system at the Central Avenue intersection with Gowe Street. Project will include construction/reconstruction of paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalk, street lighting, storm drainage, street channelization, and landscaping. NOTE: Project construction in progress - Summer 1992 SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 43,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 210,000 Construction ................................. $ 496,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 749,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, CITY, STATE PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ Sth ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 749,000 749,000 PROJECT 12 CITY OF LENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 72nd Avenue S - S 194th Street to S 196th Street DESCRIPTION: Construct new two lane roadway from S 194th Street to S 196th Street. Project will include the construction of full-width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, channelization, grading, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 80,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 216,000 Construction ................................. $ 244,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 540,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 390,000 150,000 540,000 .«p PROJECT 13 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: S. 212th Street - West Valley Highway to SR 167 DESCRIPTION:Widen existing roadway to add HOV lanes from West Valley Highway to SR 167, and modify traffic signalization systems at 84th Avenue S and SR 167. Project will include the construction of full width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, traffic signalization system modification, underground utilities, street channelization, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 600,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 3,600,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 4,200,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, LID, CITY, COUNTY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 4,200,000 4,200,000 PROJECT 14 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: ******DELETED****** SUMMARY: PROJECT 15 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: SE 256th Street - Kent-Kangley Road to 116th Ave SE DESCRIPTION: Widen existing roadway from the Kent-Kangley Road to 116th Avenue SE. Project will include construction of full-width pavement, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 434,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 928,000 Construction ................................. $ 1,538,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 2,900,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 2,900,000 2,900,000 PROJECT 16 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Crowe Road By-Pass - 97th Place S, SE 260th Street, and 108th Ave SE DESCRIPTION: Widen existing roadways, from Canyon Drive through to the Kent-Kangley Road, including traffic signalization system at the 108th Ave SE intersection with the Kent-Kangley Road. Project will include the installation of pavement to improve the turning radii at the 97th Place SE and Canyon Drive, and SE 260th Street and 108th Ave SE intersections; curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, and grading. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 150,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 167,000 Construction ................................. $ 683,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 1,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, DEVELOPER, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 1,000,000 1,000,000 PROJECT 17 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: ******DELETED****** SUMMARY: PROJECT 18 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 64th Avenue S. - S. 216th Street to S. 226th Street DESCRIPTION: Construct a new four lane roadway from S. 216th Street to S. 226th Street. Project will include full-width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, and landscaping. SUNMIARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 104,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 148,000 Construction ................................. $ 1,948,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 2,200,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) LID PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 2,200,000 2,200,000 PROJECT 19 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: James Street Safety Improvements - Central Avenue to 94th Avenue S. DESCRIPTION:Construct pedestrian safety improvements along James Street (S.240th Street) from Central Avenue to 94th Ave S., and modify the traffic signalization system at the James Street intersection at 100th Avenue SE. Project will include the provision of pedestrian protection for the north and south legs of the James Street at 100th Avenue SE traffic signalization system, signalization system interconnection between the traffic signal systems at the James Street at 94th Avenue S. and James Street at 100th Avenue SE; and traffic activated detection at those two intersections. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 62,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 288,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 350,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) HES, ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 350,000 350,000 PROJECT 20 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: DESCRIPTION: ******DELETED****** SUMMARY: PROJECT 21 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: VMS System Upgrade DESCRIPTION: Replace the City's Master Traffic Signal Control computer with a new computer system. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ Right of.Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 165,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 165,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 165,000 165,000 PROJECT 22 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Neighborhood Traffic Control Program (City-Wide) DESCRIPTION:Modify local residential streets to promote safe and appropriate levels of traffic flows SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 18,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 102,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 120,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) HES, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 20,000 20,000 20,000 60,000 120,000 PROJECT 23 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Lincoln Avenue at James Street Traffic Signal DESCRIPTION:Install traffic signalization system at the Lincoln Avenue at James Street intersection. Project will include vehicle actuation system, emergency vehicle pre-emption capability; and will include interconnection to the existing pedestrian signalization system and the Union pacific Railroad at-grade crossing approximately 100 feet easterly. NOTE: Requested by Metro to accommodate transit vehicles SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 19,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 111,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 130,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) METRO PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 130,000 PROJECT 24 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: West Valley Highway - S. 180th Street to S. 189th Street DESCRIPTION:Widen West Valley Highway to seven lanes from S. 180th Street to S. 189th Street, including modifications to the traffic signalization systems. Project will include construction of full- width pavement, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street channelization, street lighting, grading, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 65,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 505,000 Construction ................................. $ 2,130,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 2,700,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 2,700,000 2,700,000 PROJECT 25 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: James Street (S.240th Street) at Central Avenue Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Widen intersection to construct a right turn lane for westbound traffic. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 25,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 225,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 250,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, TIB, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 250,000 250,000 PROJECT 26 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Kent-Kangley Road at 111th Avenue SE Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Install traffic signalization interconnection cable between the 104th Ave SE at SE 256th Street and the Kent-Kangley Road at 111th Ave SE intersections. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ TOTAL ............................................ $ 15,000 FUNDING SOURCES) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 15,000 15,000 PROJECT 27 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET w PROJECT: Smith Street at 4th Avenue Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Widen Smith Street and 4th Avenue to provide exclusive left turn lane channelization,modify the existing traffic signalization system to provide protected left turn phasing, and improve the radii for right turning vehicles. Project will include construction of paving, reconstruction of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, modification of street channelization, and traffic signalization system modifications. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 167,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 333,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 500,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 500,000 500,000 PROJECT 28 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON w.. SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Willis Street at S. 4th Avenue Signal Modifications DESCRIPTION: Modify existing traffic signalization system at the Willis Street (SR 516) at S. 4th Ave intersection. Project will include modifying the signal mast arm for westbound traffic, installing protected/permitted phasing, and installing actuated vehicle detection equipment. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 25,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 25,000 FUNDING SOURCES) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 25,000 25,000 PROJECT 29 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: James Street - Jason Avenue to 94th Avenue South DESCRIPTION:Widen pavement to provide exclusive left turn lanes along James Street-from Jason Avenue to 94th Ave S. Project will include the construction of pavement, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and street channelization. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 40,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 200,000 Construction ................................. $ 760,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 1,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) HES, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 1,000,000 1,000,000 PROJECT 30 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: Lind Avenue - S. 180th Street to East Valley Highway DESCRIPTION: Construct new five lane roadway from S. 180th Street to East Valley Highway. Project will include construction of full-width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 150,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 550,000 Construction ................................. $ 800,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 1,500,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 1,500,000 1,500,000 PROJECT 31 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: S 224th/ S 228th Street Corridor Project • S. 228th Street - Military Road to 54th Ave S • Military Road - S. 228th Street to Kent- Des Moines Road ( WEST LEG - 224th/ 228th Street Corridor Project ) DESCRIPTION: Construct a new four/five lane roadway from Military Road to 54th Avenue S, including a new bridge across the Green River, and widen Military Road from S 228th Street to Kent-Des Moines Road. Project will include construction of full width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, grading, drainage, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 1,021,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 833,000 Construction ................................. $ 7,704,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 9,558,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 9,558,000 9,558,000 PROJECT 32 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: S.192nd/S.196th Street Corridor Project - East Valley Highway (SR181) to 92nd Avenue (EAST LEG - S.192nd/S.196th/S.200th Street Corridor Project) DESCRIPTION: Construct new four/five lane roadway, including pavement widening to S. 196th Street from East Valley Highway to 92nd Ave. South, including a new bridge over the Valley Freeway (SR 167). Project will include the construction of full-width pavement, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, landscaping, and channelization. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 1,300,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 1,000,000 Construction ................................. $ 5,449,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 8,749,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 8,749,000 8,749,000 PROJECT 33 a. CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: N. Central Avenue at Smith Street Intersection Improvements DESCRIPTION: Widen pavement to construct an additional left turn lane, and modify the existing traffic signalization system.Project will include construction of additional paving, curbs and gutters, street lighting, modifying the existing traffic signalization system and street channelization. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 90,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 120,000 Construction ................................. $ 390,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 600,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 600,000 600,000 PROJECT 34 CITY OF LENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 94th Avenue S. - Canyon Drive to James Street DESCRIPTION: Widen 94th Avenue S. to a three lane roadway from James Street to Canyon Drive. Project will include construction of paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 120,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 680,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 800,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 800,000 800,000 PROJECT 35 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: SE 248th Street - 94th Ave SE to 116th Ave SE DESCRIPTION: Widen SE 248th Street to three lanes from 94th Avenue SE to 116th Avenue SE. Project will include construction of paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, drainage, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 300,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 1,700,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 2,000,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, LID, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 2,000,000 2,000,000 PROJECT 36 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 84th Avenue S. - S. 212th Street to SR 167 DESCRIPTION: Widen 84th Avenue S. to seven lanes from S. 212th Street to SR 167. Project will include construction of full-width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks,street lighting, modification to the existing traffic signalization systems, street channelization, drainage, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 320,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 1,830,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 2,150,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 2,150,000 2,150,000 PROJECT 37 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: James Street at 104th Avenue SE Acceleration Lanes DESCRIPTION: Construct an acceleration lane for eastbound traffic along James Street ( S. 240th Street ); from 104th Ave S, easterly a distance of 600 feet. Project will include the construction of additional paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, and minor modifications to the existing traffic signalization system. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 15,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ Construction ................................. $ 135,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 150,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) ISTA, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 150,000 150,000 PROJECT 38 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: West Meeker Street - 64th Ave S. to West Valley Highway DESCRIPTION: Widen West Meeker Street to five lanes, from 64th Avenue South to West Valley Highway. Project will include construction of full-width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, minor modifications to the traffic signalizationystems at the intersections of W. Meeker at 64th Ave S. and West Valley Hwy., drainage, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 225,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 500,000 Construction ................................. $ 775,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 1,500,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) TIB, CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ 5th ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 1,500,000 1,500,000 PROJECT 39 CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON SIX YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BUDGET PROJECT: 72nd Avenue South - S 196th Street to S 200th Street DESCRIPTION: Construct a new two lane roadway from S 196th Street to S 200th Street. Project will include construction of full-width paving, curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, street channelization, grading, and landscaping. SUMMARY: Preliminary Engineering ................ $ 80,000 Right of Way Acquisition ................ $ 216,000 Construction ................................. $ 244,000 TOTAL ............................................ $ 540,000 FUNDING SOURCE(S) CITY PROJECT COST: First Year 4th/ Sth ANNUAL ELEMENT 2nd Year 3rd Year & 6th Year TOTAL 540,000 540,000 PROJECT 40 Public Works Committee June 17, 1992 --- Page 2 The Committee unanimously approved that the Public Works staff develop an interim solution to the problem. CPG Grant Wickstrom explained we had applied for this grant last year. When originally presented, it was noted this grant would fund 60% of the Solid Waste Coordinator's position. It was recognized that if the grant were approved, the City would have to come up with the 40% match. We have received approval of our grant application. Because of the City's financial situation, we rewrote the job description to that of a Conservation Specialist, decreased the responsibilities but added a water conservation element, and placed it under the supervision of the Public Works Administrative Assistant III. The City is required to meet certain water reductions through conservation by 1995 . This approach then gives us the ability to address the conservation issue as well and the 40% match can be funded from the water utility. This completely funds the position without any impact to the general fund. A _. further benefit is that if we advertise the position in-house only, the possibility of another general fund position filling this position further relieves the general fund. Wickstrom added that if we do not move forward on this shortly the grant offer will be repealed. Wickstrom stated he was requesting concurrence of the change in the position as explained, authorization, to sign the grant agreement and transferring approximately $32 , 000 from the water utility to finance the 40% match for the position. Jim Bennett commented that since this is a program that is required and we have a grant that pays for a percentage of the position, it makes sense to approve it. Wickstrom stated this addressed two problems with no impact on the general fund. We have to address recycling as mandated through adoption of the comprehensive plan and we have to reduce water consumption by 5% by 1995. The Committee unanimously recommended that the request be approved. Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan Wickstrom explained that the action required is to authorize us to establish July 21 as the hearing date for the Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. He stated we will bring a draft of the Plan to the Committee for their review at the next Committee meeting. The Committee unanimously approved setting July 21 as hearing date for the Six Year TIP. Kent city Council Meeting Y () � Date July 7 . 1992 N frA` t Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 272ND/277TH CORRIDOR 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to set August 4 as the date for the public hearing on a proposed Council action relating to implementation of the FEIS preferred alignment for the 272nd/277th Corridor project. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director 4. RECOMMENDED BY: 3-0 vote of Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3Y DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS a..,a June 24, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROMJ w\ RE: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT - 272ND/277TH CORRIDOR The Final Environmental Impact Statement for the 272nd/277th Corridor is now complete. As reflected in the attached map, Alternate A has been selected as the preferred alignment. To implement this project, King County must formally adopt this alignment. Their procedure to do so is via their road establishment process. The action sought from City Council is to direct staff to proceed with the project and to pursue the County's road establishment of the preferred alignment as reflected in the F.E.I .S. Due to the public sensitivity towards this project, it is recommended that full Council hold a public hearing on this proposed action and then refer the matter back to the Public Works Committee for a formal recommendation. If the Committee concurs, then the Public Works Department recommends the hearing date be set for August 4th. w j a 0 z w I,--i' ll .L, 0 G y�4._ ..y I_. ;•I-.._L. _L..4I IP..__. � �1 I�r FJ'I-i 1 J n '_,...i � ,._. •.i luli�, I ��• V.-i .o' 'I-''=- -i�il�='� 'i:' T_� Iof � IY�� _.... a's MAY 410U Spa F)1 _' iopf.J�..i.iu cu I °' oc vp I i4 �o 0 Q 0 /d9aa p���• °f : 9 F ��. f r I AJo.i Fa Dc co I ri IC [[:'T�`J r .f";• ., d: `G y I-.1_Ih� :'-T TIP L f..4 ..S� .0.•0 1'11 'R c '`O� :1;19 J o of •. 2eo J. —All I-U - I �ar- oT_ QI o . SS Y 47601 °� 1 of _ to J Ci'� _1 :o�..� Pe A�d:O: i Y i •�cc o? Il�-�-L :�°�O:p. J 11Ji.GUPO Di I 3S'peY Jr I — 00�• i I L._ •a:J... I // /`�a o c.•.. o !gyp y L._ - _I__—_� ,_. I___—__—___--'�__-� , ' ,moo .�,•°�..°�, � '. ., z e°.x'c<�7r°-..a,.• 'ao ate.o_� .y L _1 I L .I v^' o ye O I -I- a •� /' z ---I j i W e�e S-3 , 13 .° 0 aCam - •/.M .(4I11A 1103 p ' � HL71 `t 11 I 7 °-.L..J...—_ L.—__1..Ja O Rii �--� 4 �� ........... ddJuly 7, 1992 ed V REQUEST FOR EXCUSED ABSENCE Approval of a request from Councilmember Orr for an excused absense from tonight' s Council meeting, since she is unable to attend. . ........ ..... Kent City Council Meeting (� Date July 7 , 1992 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for a public meeting with the petitioners of the Chestnut Ridge Annexation, a 190-acre area adjacent to the City's eastern border in the vicinity of 208th and 92nd Ave. The City Clerk has given the required notification to the petitioners and public of this meeting. The motion was supported by the Public Works Committee at their July 1 meeting. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, map of proposed annexation area, map denoting existing county zoning and fiscal analysis 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: 3-0 vote of Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: N0 /X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ) Councilmember_ III/ moves, Councilmember Wn,/w " seconds that the 10 percent petition for the Chestnut Ridge Annexation be accepted, the boundaries as identified by staff be accepted, the annexation area be subject to the city's existing indebtedness and the 60 percent petition be circulated. DISCUSSION• rol� ACTION• ^I V' Council Agenda Item No. 4A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 30, 1992 TO: MAYOR KELLEHER 7 CITY COUNCIL FROM: DON WICKSTRO RE: CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION After the Annexation Committee met with citizens of this proposed annexation area at a community forum at Springbrook Elementary, the City received a 10% petition to annex approximately 190 acres adjacent to the City's eastern border in the vicinity of 208th Street and 92nd Avenue. The meeting tonight is dictated by State law wherein the City must meet with the petitioners within 60 days from receipt of an annexation request. The purpose of this meeting is for the Council to determine whether to accept, reject or geographically modify the proposed annexation. Also, Council must determine whether to require the assumption of all or any portion of the City's existing indebtedness. As you will note on the attached map, the Soos Creek Plan denotes the Preliminary Urban Growth area for this proposed annexation to be in Kent and not Renton. For Council's convenience, also enclosed is the following pertinent information: o Map of Proposed Annexation Area with respect to City limits; o Map of Proposed Annexation Area denoting proposed boundary thereof; o Map denoting existing County zoning o Financial analysis prepared by the Finance Department Any action by City Council to move forward with the annexation should include that the City's indebtedness be a condition thereof. V i V N 0 A 'a I b' Ii ,A '.r 'a1 X a Y IF .■ v v v v v v Preliminary Urban Growth \ ' ) Areas A(J J I , Urban/Rural Boundary Preliminary City 1 v Urban Growth Area ea Urban Separator r . I .. ° � —_ 1 •• ,'\ �I •^ � � Source:King County Community Planning 1 ENT;ON R. :.I I Executive Proposed Seas Creek- I Community Plan Update 1991 ' ._ — LL gr2da - dr i Pa o�exarrory. 1Y1 f V r t 1 �' :r' 1 ti L KENT � ' �tXzt<y""rl ram.1� L Auburn /\`\ �/•.� _ // _ ^� , e. .. / f ,. ' •- _ -. Soos Creek Community Planning Area l =� King County Planning and Community Development Division o '" _— B IBB,N:, SEA TNC AIRPORT \s 0 av >:• ow L S��•"3y, lS v�FYI 4 SRA.� `.rr' 9 IBBi 9i r `4`c §C'v ,'\3•t ;� 3 ,{y `a� PR PO$ 5{ TION 3 s��� � v� ro..,� . ix x£9'�?{•�v s d� is ��A . •i v:i#.♦ �v 4s � � Tu tai^.i��" �a�> y ^�#F ANGLE I.K. , �t� �'�a. � ��* �� xs�'F�� �& .Yt f#x y�,t�,ge tY is 'N£i�iY•kA it 1' rc x o3 �� � �', t x,rF;VVz��`'s•.n4tEL�. L�\"a�L�$ �x � 3'yg� �v i)3`"$s�"x•"�. -. 9 2BBTM ST �a xh�gix�f 1�3ttix`FP F� "y�'f A�q> � �'� wy •x ax���k e + �} i s y.�xF x++ Spa➢;t L4tl�gh�� ,aa.., W � : {`s t����a,g$ x Zas# Z I` vx 20BTN ST yx id•$�rxx� °�a xx, is ems, �i t fix. v 4 x t X x IBTM ST t E � t xr NZ k >, i )x`x� i 4`aC Lei ixx s' 7 s A 1x •x .•+rzLs A o\ - ht �, '�. 5 '`FL i a $ x5e ' rt `•E: 'a'�x'S s •1k .rtss i '� i i s, ve•; a y`)': rs xvrk.i;. $ L >s ¢ '> y;,Xi ) ':Ya: e m a `� a.^ ���.���111 fi ^��D v_ Y 3• � L y� t a �. yy t O 1�: '. ) r�h�t l� - � ::)ays� T 4j s y n •, # Tr- . F *t a,.Ywpr m• 4 J �y )r q xi K yt .,)Y £�3 it $� •50 4L3 $ B• ) � > > Y3 xsc•wi e♦ q X ;`3 5 if�it ae 1 3y. �.) � � ✓ a k X'�MA'>�h ):: �.>it'xna"K RZA s134'g SSA. s'AI' i _ t � f �' t ? '�xt ` : y sr�s `' cvy xc mY s&y§f •Nt� 5 tt :3x dts w a �t x '�^ mYaA Xq.x d� +§f3>z S 1I1 .+ F» y s> •.'" s �� .k'��` yey�'$�5 �` 9Sk�� �r3'-s,e ir"Lr.ty '^ A( Y r�'aE #S4$ 3 � k),�saR i £ z L FENNICNtsta 4 , f� Lin Lr.0 e t �, �•:� x�t..iY.�. ,x rf^'� s xPry�W $55 ;{s i y' a b. x'S� t✓53 ?:fib' S Jr Y y t yt 1 sFy r� 3 sx ( c STAR LB 9 277TXT' sas •. .I,I,,I I I,I . 1 1 1 1 1 1� I I I ; 1 1.1 D -rl to 1�_ 1—4. I 1 —1 1 t)I I AOII I1�11■ for", -1 ij M .21 Z 2OZ 40; 9 Tf to* G If I Li LLJ I or iO3R Irp I — 2 'rl or 4 1.V Tr L Li C E,,S T ' WAS H I G T N from R.T.- rot llorJ ,, - 5 7s— 17 11 It -D! G FE It" 11 III -,D > -7 1S 20-5 TH S ----------t". R j, -1 is r P R 0 Vrooll' C".E t� T It rlYA r Ui I I 7 I I t 5. A T S El I !S CID -S I I . " . I i..-j F ------- !1,-4, r,:_1 ----- . S.. 2:117 . '. 0 H P LI 10011A 4.J • I q!01 STI MQ �- 1 !ST z 0 1 r A M , for 7y,it . F R I L. M a9, 20?Ill rip Is. itif L I I U I I I I I U 1 1..j I it v I I 'I'll 11 i:f I I I I I I I 1 1$.,'1 T, I rot 1- �-208T, 1 4! 1 1, 11 1 A,L_ dv, roll illne Z roll Area: Approx. 190 acres rol Assessed Value: 38,638,,287 Estimated Population: 495 L-,,I LO or' or, -; I rX 1 • C"O WI LP (,go Toll V; 212jjj i i iTi i fj T1 I Fi wo: 7 __emu qn'e' U ! I ili I11 I i'r11 )ml I I l i I l r l II•�V I I [ I l i l l { �.._.-.. i lt.l lllrll 4 i 'III ). I rl I a r'•„ If tt 1 �Irn Y,t1{,jit1t11Ii{�tI i'iji 11��111fL rl In nnrr„- 1'nl Dul I - L`I•n� __Jl_. reN� wa III 1]I _ nn.'I rrni. ngllrrr �I •In1 �i I oil _ r• 1{I lr Y - I- nrnciin r[ ' _ lul I' of ._ Irn 71f lrnvi>rl i� ,1 r I,r ` -_. ..i _ •I ____..._..- 1 + - - >,-.V J. •nn n ' 1`Il f• r.nn (f� • � C,_�•.� •'�"'S"'--�.:202 Irv„} aa,":FTir'u H1!";- —._ ._l_:I_____ 1-r __,„ , ,•u,mr ' t-Aj' 1n1- 1:-=�ar .i',-;n:.,•' ,; n II r ,I,r rel nn i I{- -------- +1. --- -� � :;a I� 9 { er ':i{m la I•II lu ' II rl t h . .r r(I' un�. + '' r 'i Illif rt� tea.- r•' a ty!,")„ ����,'�r Jar n nl •1 1rlo e,,,r I � r • :'^. •�. -n-- c,_..n_rl,�;d a t. I'•' "tit - -:.rr'�I fay. t.J •, +r ;",I ,r+j n ; ' ��a•` " � =1 L_� • t'Innr plum Fri I��• 1- ._ 1 �'", r �, I_I -_ JO -O__ •' �•n -j����ltt! nt :1\ m i n:' 1):. ,/� • 203A a ST. .a 1 Olc 4<. __".11[._ 1' F .nr� Y.•,�j- .(.r14 1' •y I, � � • ^ . � .JJ..II rlrl -- I; B;;- �.6�'Jflt ��kY , t r iuR-•�j -i 1 .__04111 , ram' •+ ���'y l- Ir 4n J " �r JII•-al •���J1 1 Itl i Lr.�I- .:It'9 •;',,-- 7Qnl 1nnn� r' I It < I n1•-.-j le`I -is 6 -`Jfe-i__._nr r,\.r�e 1 } 1 ' i'- :i,nn .• e� >:j• n � _'['�ilTrRt�';'•t.,(-"—" �f,_��rr TTI o I ' ''• n ol_��ne4 Cer� I C" IIElyyu• N'UI.Ir; ��' '+ r9i,' WASH I,NGTrsN v Tn.S + 704TH 'q- ' e t + , y._r•f »rlrlocr ,r, t 171 �__-_ ,JY. r r v �•.ln' ,, rt 'r J4!, _( i ? arq r i 2 1 , a • JAnrl ••rO \lal `-� 111 It •�'._I:I 11 "X •r c f 11•rrr-- .ri fr.rrml '1 .en„ I\.•. , c -E n� 1=i � . � . r f g � •Ir: Ir•P� �_'_;�� ---- -. _,I -:.n:: .- .-1.{Y,•'.. in�ti...l ;ell'/'• •�- 3,,,•=••�- i_ I-"..-y' • �/e fi ,tY> I_u u. -_,1 TI. ❑ t C I rr t a nf� n l _¢ u r, -vl Irl ^ ! •. ,un��i 1I.1 'i.ln : ' �' 1\�," r_-_ I .J .r• tt)J -> _ 1•eun>r_ I,` � 1''` 1• I, ie ' 9 a r1 r _'!_ _____-I I• t° • , ' I rn - - 205THrP "t' " `+"r „tin nv, r'•'1�• v A .I f.reevrt _ r .'� 'b:. 1' 7v"�•�t • �` °•I✓.,, :c.y` tZ. re _ _ ;J — I CENTRNLrI ., s JJI � �' r,.,r- e IMPROVE \ •1t,l�a�._'+ uy`_^11 I ,flr ` I • f n u n IIV.1 •q p p\ n, c I'��11• Je J V ' by.r�All F( �tll Mj r 1 f t t r9 I _a.•••.•••//// an' I -arc--_. ._.Ilt , •v f _�$T p VI 'N rES, dTfiS eJ• P A .i::•UV i 1?. re ri I'� 11-�-ec: ' S. 20STH PLY • _.Jr:). •,•,I �" ��I ,.' �'J •'4 jll DO "ri �1„II + I,f" ,Stl VI v ostJ [7 11� � LIC 0 M P n N r ' s '1� " �L�1 .JI Il !IH, IJJ.r F R a' I r.� 'n N f 1 •t ■9:- - ' 207 I11 I'! - 'o )•• .QC - Ill R t•JIr `." �rR Irt .S Ih I!' I JnI,JJ r TiI ' -I C4 1 � , fll , ;,it ; 1_I.V 1'JJ .,I6 J�n �ji I I F _;It H jl)` f Ta ' - N �l_ , 1 ' a r. _ Im p II c_ r, "' '" iLt tllut.l� tttlll.)Y.Ut.Art+7Y" tt}tr�l`'ttttitttttNl _ I ��� •�, r`i\_ S. 208TH Ad u Ij -I; i� j�r n;•trt-.N I� !I,� n r7 r.lonin / rod Ito FIJI lrmn hJll :4. S. zlotnt IF AfT 7•� Ill �• .ti / �—�t reiar •� ,, � r°' �''� lol�. �}' 1. .l.µr � laii Ira ' / .,� -- ' .'_..nl»_.----rn—: '] .'.f�T' ,�. ,rr�', � I ' J " •' -- 41__;,_'L� V'I`...... --------_ IH 1Lr.Tia!r �:I�,'('>•(_L' n s '4Fr 'LX G' r Ill i rl If n n�f .`� O a • crtj�> 1t' + IF IR! — LJ �f it e •�. r U • s rFit ' Sir r 7 /'•e a•i m o0 CITY OF KENT e FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS-Chestnut Ridge ,�,'OR THE YEAR 1992 Total acres 11,881 190 V Total number of parcels 8,400 263 Total number of res. units 6,066 U 241 Total estimated population 39,650 P 495 Total assessed valuation 3,508,127,478 A 38,638,287 Criminal CITYWIDE General CIP Street Justice Storm Dr. other Revenue: BUDGET Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total Prop. Tax a 3.186220) 10,947,540 A 103,464 103,464 Sales Tax 11,194,747 Utility Tax(2) 3,998,065 0 14,805 14,805 Special Assessments 2,234,133 Real Estate Excise 600,000 A 6,608 6,608 Gambling Taxes 514,000 840 Business Licenses and Permits(3) 230,746 0 840 3,471 Grants 278,025 P 3,471 State Shared Revenue 2,557,795 P 13,648 16,428 1,858 31,934 6,362 Local Sales Tax Criminal Justice 509,589 P 6,362 Fire Insurance Premium Tax 83,700 P 1,045 1,045557 Drug Task Force Revenue 44,594 P 557 Fire Protection District if 37(4) 2,302,924 0 (44,675) (44,675) Jail Intergovernmental Revenue 825,485 5,810 King County Medical Service Levy 527,540 A 5,810 7,076 ""'Fines and Forfeitures 566,759 A 7,076 Parks 1,563,916 P Miscellaneous Fees(5) 892,453 0 9,990 9,990 Interest Income 4,314,301 Water Utility 7,605,768 Sewer utility 7,215,986 963 Drainage Utility(6) 3,242,563 0 8,963 5, Street Utility @1.90/M U 5,495 ,495 95 Golf 2,741,874 Estimated Total Revenue 64,982,503 114,429 6,608 16,428 8,777 8,963 6,540 161,745 Expenditures: General Government(7) 5,543,538 0 27,133 ,133 Police 8,558,635 P 98,071 8,777 106,848 Fire 10,157,327 Public Works-Street 4,114,207 A 6,608 38,706 45,314 Leisure Services 7,166,342 Health and Human Services 1,918,909 P 28,610 28,610 Debt Service 10,862,956 Water Utility 5,605,802 Sewer Utility 6,242,453 Drainage Utility(6) 5,616,856 0 6,108 (6,108) 0 Estimated Total Expenditures 65,787,025 153,814 6,608 44,814 8,777 (6,108) 0 207,905 w Net Impact Income (Loss) (39,385) 0 (28,386) 0 15,071 6,540 (46,160) CITY OF KENT NOTES TO CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION FOR THE YEAR 1992 v- (1) PROPERTY TAXES: City Regular Levy 2.67776 X 38,638,287 Assessed Valuation Excess Levy 0.50846 ---------- 103,464 General Fund revenue -------------- 1000 3.18622 (2) UTILITY TAXES: Estimated Average Yearly Residential Utility Bill; Electrical/Natural Gas 924 Telephone 186 Water 189 Sewer 230 Drainage 25 -------------- Rate Subtotal 1,555 X 3.50% = 54.41 Garbage 108 X 6.50% = 7.02 -------------- ---------- Total For Year 1,663 61.43 X 241 Res. Units= 14,805 (3) BUSINESS LICENSE: Estimated Population 495 --------------X 2692 Total Licenses = 33.60 Additional Licenses Total Population 39,650 X 25.00 Business in Home License ---------- 840.00 (4) FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 937: Assessed Valuation 38,638,287 -------------- = 38,638 X 1.28471 County Rate = 49,639 1000 X .90 City Portion 44,675 Loss to City (5) MISCELLANOUS FEES: , Planning, Engineering miscellaneous fees 783,154 General Government miscellaneous fees 109,299 892,453 Assessed Valuation 38,638,287 --------------X 783,154 = 8,626 Planning, Engineering miscellaneous fees City Assessed Valuation 3,508,127,478 Estimated Population 495 General Government --------------X 109,299 = 1,364 General Government miscelleous fees Total Population 39,650 ---------- 9,990 Total miscelleous fees (6) DRAINAGE UTILITY: Drainage Basin "I" monthly charge 2.84 X 12 months 34.08 X 263 parcels = 8,963 Drainage Revenue Drainage expenses estimated by Engineering Department. This is a expense to the Street Department, but income to the Drainage Utility. (7) GENERAL GOVERNMENT: General Government expenses not expected to be as much using a ratio of annexation estimated population to the city total population, times the General Expenses. This is because some services are not expected to be needed. General Government 5,543,538 Police 8,558,635 Public Works-Street 4,114,207 Health and Human Services 1,918,909 Drainage Utility 5,616,856 -------------- Modified Expenditures 25,791,795 Modified Expenditures 25,791,795 --------------= 39.20% Modification Ratio X 495 Chestnut Ridge Est. Pop. Total City Expenses 65,787,025 --------- X 5,543,538 = 27,133 �- 39,650 City Pop. Kent City Council Meeting ; j Date July 7 . 1992 Category other Business 1. SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDING THE APPLICATION OF LICENSE FEES ON "AMUSEMENT DEVICES" UNDER KCC 5. 19. 030 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This amendment would exempt non-coin- operated "amusement d.avices", excluding pool and billard tables, from annual special licensing fees. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee (Mann & Johnson in favor; Orr opposed) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended (Some fees lost) 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $$ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: J Councilmember movers, councilmember seconds adoption of Ordinance `_ amending the application of license fees on amusement device,-'. DISCUSSION• / ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4B i �I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to the licensing and regulation of amusement devices and amending Ordinance Nos. 3027 and 2381. I WHEREAS, Section 5.04 of the Kent City Code defines the word, j "amusement device" to include both coin-operated amusement devices rand amusement devices for which a flat fee is charged; and I WHEREAS, KCC Section 5. 19. 030 establishes an annual license fee that applies to all amusement devices, whether coin-operated or not; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that owners of amusement devices that charge a flat fee, such as an hourly or daily fee, not be charged the annual license fee established in KCC Section 5. 19 . 030; NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DOES HEREBY , ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 5. 19. 030 is amended as follows: 5. 19 . 030. LICENSE FEES. The fee for any coin-operated amusement device, other than pool or billiard tables, shall be fifty dollars ($50. 00) per year per device. The fee for pool or billiard tables shall be consistent with 5. 04 . 030. Section 2 . Severability. The provisions of this ordinance dare declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any ' clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall not affect the validity of the I i ,.I i remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. I Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect li and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final I approval and passage as provided by law. I I I DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR I I ATTEST: j BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY !; PASSED the day of , 1992 • r APPROVED the day of , 1992 • PUBLISHED the day of , 1992 • I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK i i j I i I 2 r (I II ............... Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 . 1992 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: 1991 EDITIONS OF UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE, UNIFORM HOUSING CODE AND UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Staff requests the adoption of the 1991 editions of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Housing Code and the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. These codes have received extensive review by the State Building Code Council and have been approved. The State Legislature has passed these codes into law which is effective July 1, 1992 . The action by the City Council will bring the City Code in alignment with State law. Any local amendments to these codes must be passed by the Local Government Agency and presented to the State six months prior to adoption. As of this date, City staff does not intend to recommend any local amendments. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee 2-0 (Mann & Orr) (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO < YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember 10-nT\-/' moves, Councilmember V" seconds adoption of Ordinance - ( J)7a-dopting the 1991 Edition of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Housing Code and the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. DISCUSSION: ACTION• G1 f Council Agenda Item No. 4C K II I i i ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to building codes; amending Chapter 14 .04 of Kent City Code to adopt the Uniform Building Code 1991 Edition, together with certain amendments thereto and adopting specific chapters of the appendix to said code and adopting the Uniform Building Code Standards; amending Chapter 14 . 10 of Kent City Code to adopt the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings 1991 Edition; amending Chapter 14 . 12 of Kent City Code to adopt the Uniform Housing Code 1991 Edition; amending Chapter 14 . 14 of Kent City code to adopt the Uniform Mechanical Code 1991 Edition together with certain amendments thereto; amending Chapter 14 . 16 of Kent City Code to adopt the Uniform Plumbing Code 1991 Edition, together with certain amendments thereto and adopting the Uniform Plumbing Code Standards; amending Kent City Ordinances 2199, 2200, 2201, 2517, 2639, and 2921, and repealing Kent City Ordinances 3021, 3022 and 3023 . WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent has +' determined that the enactment of comprehensive, uniform building regulations will promote the health, safety and welfare of the '' citizens of Kent; and WHEREAS, such building regulations will define minimum ,jperformance standards and requirements for construction and liconstruction materials, consistent with accepted standards of 'iengineering, fire and life safety; and I Ii i iI I- 1 I WHEREAS, such building regulations will eliminate ,'! restrictive, obsolete, conflicting and duplicative regulations jj and requirements which unnecessarily increase construction costs and/or retard the use of new materials, products, or methods of h ,; i construction; and II I WHEREAS, the enactment of such comprehensive building ; regulations is consistent with the mandate of RCW 19. 27 . 020; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. City of Kent Ordinance 3021 entitled: AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to the plumbing code, amending the monetary permit fees to reflect the adoption of same by the City Council, upon recommendation of the Building Official, amending Kent City Code Section 14 . 16.070 (Ordinances 2921, 2639, 2517 and 2200) . is hereby repealed. Section 2 . City of Kent Ordinance 3022 entitled: AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to building permits, amending the City's Building Code to clarify the fee schedule for the processing and issuance of building permits under the Code, amending Kent City Code Section 14 . 04 . 010 (Ordinances 2921, 2639, 2517 and 2199) . is hereby repealed. i Section 3 . City of Kent Ordinance 3023 entitled: , I I I� it it AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to mechanical permits, amending the City's Mechanical Code to clarify the fee schedule for the processing and issuance of mechanical permits under the code, by adding a new section 14 . 14. 020 (Ordinance 2921, 2639 and 2517) . its hereby repealed. i i Section 4. Section 14. 04. 010 of the Kent City Code { (Ordinances 2199, 2517 and 2639 as last amended by Ordinance ! 2921) is hereby amended to read as follows: !' 14 . 04.010 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE ADOPTED - AMENDMENTS. '! There is adopted by reference upon the filing of one copy thereof .iwith the Kent City Clerk, that certain code known as Uniform �jBuilding Code ( ({39 88} ) ) 1991 Edition as amended by Chapter 51-20 ( of the Washington Administrative Code as currently enacted and '! as amended from time to time also hereby adopted by reference, i! with the following ( ( ) ) amendments: ii rr ( (A. Seetien 301 (a) . shall be amended te add the it is I L'e 1$f�f Bet Befere any demelitien permit a.7.,issued, applieant ii er his agent shall pest---a�sh bend with the Gity Treasurer in the ameantf $309 09 whieh will be refundable ',apatt inspeetien ii s en file with the- Git,x and final if a perma"ent bend I I' Treasurer-, that ameunt may be ) ) ( B. -All—references in Ghapter ' ' t r ef this a te handleap standards shall be superseded1 j3 � I ! I i ..d as fellewse Fixed awnings ef any iength may be ereeted en a stery bulmimej upen appreval ef the Building Offieial. ) ) I A. Section 304 , "Fees, " shall be amended to read as ' follows: Sec. 304. (a) General. Fees shall be assessed in . accordance with the provisions of this section ( (er shall be as set ferth in the F sehediale _depted by thejurisdietien) ) . Section 5. Section 14 . 04 . 020 of the Kent City Code, (Ordinances 2199, 2517 and 2639 as last amended by Ordinance 2921) is amended to read as follows: 14 .04 . 020. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE APPENDICES ADOPTED. `- Chapters 10 it Division II of Chapter 12 , and Chapters 32 and 70 of the Appendix of the Uniform Building Code ( ({1988}) ) 1991 Edition are adopted. Section 6. Kent City Code Chapter 14 . 04 is hereby amended by the addition thereto of Section 14 . 04. 030, to read as ;, follows: 14 . 04 . 030 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE STANDARDS ADOPTED. There is adopted by reference upon the filing of one copy thereof '' with the Kent City Clerk a certain document known as the Uniform IBuilding Code Standards 1991 Edition as amended by Chapter 51-21 of the Washington Administrative Code as currently enacted and as amended from time to time also hereby adopted by reference. 4 i ICI i ,,III i Section 7. Section 14. 10. 010 of the Kent City Code (Ordinances 2201, 2517 and 2639 and as last amended by Ordinance 2921) is amended to read as follows: i f 14. 10. 010. UNIFORM CODE FOR THE ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS ( BUILDINGS ADOPTED. There is adopted by reference upon the filing 11of one copy thereof with the Kent City Clerk, that certain code �1known as Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings 1991 Edition. ii Section S. Section 14. 12 . 010 of the Kent City Code !i (Ordinances 2201, 2517 and 2639 and as last amended by Ordinance 2921) is amended to read as follows: I 14. 12 .010. UNIFORM HOUSING CODE ADOPTED. There is ;; adopted by reference upon the filing of one copy thereof with the 1'! Kent City Clerk, that certain code known as Uniform Housing Code 1991 Edition ( (:) ) with the following amendments: A. Sections 202 203 of Chapter 2 and Chapters 11,_ •,i12 13 14 15 and 16 of the Uniform Housing Code, 1991 Edition, ,, are hereby repealed. !i �i Section 9 . Section 14 . 14 . 010 of the 'Kent City Code (Ordinances 2201, 2517, and 2639 and as last amended by Ordinance ,, 2921) is amended to read as follows: iI ,I 14 . 14 .010. UNIFORM MECHANICAL CODE ADOPTED. There is d hereby adopted by reference upon the filing of one copy thereof I� with the Kent City Clerk, that certain code known as Uniform ! Mechanical Code 1991 Edition ( (—) ) as amended by Ii i, 5 1' i �I I� 1 II ; Chapter 51 22 of the Washington Administrative Code as currently enacted and as amended from time to time also hereby adopted b reference with the following amendments: J� ; A. Section 304 (a) "Fees" shall be amended to read as ifollows: Sec. 304 (a) General. Fees shall be assessed in ,, accordance with the provisions of this section ( (er shall a j set f LL in LL F L d l ...7... ted by this L ' On) ) Section 10. Section 14 . 16. 010 of the Kent City Code (Ordinances 2200, 2517, and 2639 and as last amended by Ordinance . 2921) is amended to read as follows: 14 . 16. 010. UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE ADOPTED - AMENDMENTS. !' There is adopted by reference upon the filing of one copy with the Kent City Clerk, that certain code known as Uniform Plumbing ', Code ( ( (1988) ) ) 1991 Edition, as amended by Chapter 51-26 of the Washington Administrative Code as currently enacted and as !'; amended from time to time also hereby adopted by reference, with the following amendments and additions: ( (A. L 1 0 0 8 shall l be amended t read as f e l l iI �Ti Testing o eh-appreval, L th het a ela _ter piping shall l L subjeeted te a full l welrzinEj L tes r i frame-the main er meter, er te an air pressure test ef t less tL hundred (109) peunds per square ineh far } less than -teen-(15) minutes pipin mustnet leak L subjeeted to sueh test- Het and eeld rr r-eved iqlastie water piping is te be I 6 I! ;I �j I� I I I 1 a:--o,ccct9n-3: a a } _a 9A7T�` ••L..l l_ L i fellewse The Ameriean Gas =sseeiatien, Under—writers i t }Lqe T lT } 1 Standards institute the Nat a � l } l Gede al! reefalre that demestie-water L } L.+ .I !�Ipr-enpwly installed temperature and pressure relief valves even leuteut. The temperature sensing element fe.ust be immersed in the Ij irelief a : W3 ei` , temperature � l F valve must }}. F L l } } i'� I it II , j i giapx�Te—exterier grade 'T'L diseharge line L_l , net be iI water.ii i E:—Peetien 1008Tb` amended te read as fellews- e3F water se lee piping II i t -- eutside the building shall: have a to (l n) feet L } l }len F rem the building l drain piping. Eliminate separrai i ��Seet:lets 1 A A 8 (b)l and 2- i! i A. Section 30. 4 "Fees" shall be amended to read as follows: 30.4 (a) Permit Fees. ( ('"L�zor- eaeh-permit shall j be set s=-in Table Nes 3-�) ) The Building Official is j authorized to prepare a schedule of fees applicable to plumbing i_ ermits hereafter issued commensurate with the cost of j administration and inspection involved in the processing and !iissuance of such permits Any such schedule when adopted by the 7 I I I I � I I jl I je i i` ;; City Council by resolution as currently established by City of l' Kent Resolution 1308 and as may be hereinafter amended, shall 11 govern the amount of the fee for any permit, which shall be collected as a condition to issuance. i B. Section 20. 3 of Part one "Administration" of this code is amended to read as follows: it 20.3 (a) Violations. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, . repair, move, improve, remove, convert, demolish, equip, use, or . maintain any plumbing or permit the same to be done in violation of this Code. (b) Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of this code ( (shall be deemed guilty of a isdemeane eta . ''here f ) ) shall be punishable by a fine and/or imprisonment as set forth in Chapter 14. 24 of the Kent City Code. ( (by the geverning laws ef the jurisdietien. , Eaeh separate a er any pertien violation e€ this Gene-oeeuTer eentinues, shall be deemed separate Section 11. Chapter 14 . 16 of the Kent City Code is hereby amended by the addition thereto of Section 14. 16. 020, to read as follows: 14. 16. 020. UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE STANDARDS ADOPTED. There is adopted by reference upon the filing of one copy thereof with the Kent City Clerk that certain document known as the Uniform Plumbing Code Standards 1991 Edition as adopted by Chapter 51-27 of the Washington Administrative Code as currently 8 I I i I i i ,; enacted and as amended from time to time also hereby adopted by I reference. i it Section 12 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take ( effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its h (; final approval and passage as provided by law. I DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: ' BRENDA JACOBER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the day of 1992 • APPROVED the day of 1 _1992 • PUBLISHED the day of , 1992 . ii i 'i Ij 9 i 1 I Kent City Council Meeting �V Date July 7. 1992 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS OF UNIFORM BUILDING, HOUSING, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING CODES 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Staff requests adoption of an ordinance providing for a civil penalty process for violations of the Uniform Building, Housing, Mechanical and Plumbing Codes, at the same time repealing the criminal penalties from the Kent City Code. This proposed process is very similar to the Zoning Code Penalty Ordinance and will provide a more consistent enforcement of the City Codes. It will also remove the criminal aspect of violating the Uniform Codes and replace it with a civil procedure. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public safety Committee 2-0 Mann & Orr (Committee, Staff, E aminer, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERS NNEL IMPACT: NO�_ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember a`►v� moves, Councilmember seconds the adoption of Ordinance JC' . 3enacting a civil penalty procedure for the violation of the Uniform Building, Housing, Mechanical and Plumbing Codes. DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Ageqpa Item No. 4D I, I i i I � i I I I I ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to Building, Housing, Mechanical and Plumbing Code enforcement, adding a new Chapter 14 .24 on enforce- ment, providing both civil and criminal penalties for violations and repealing Section 14 . 24 . 010 of the Kent City Code. WHEREAS, at least one of the Building, Housing, Mechanical and Plumbing Codes (adopted by the City of Kent under K.C.C. Sec. 14 . 04. 010, 14 . 12 . 010, 14 . 14 . 010 and 14 . 16. 010, respectively) , presently contain abbreviated procedures for the enforcement of Code violations, makes such violations a criminal offense and provides for criminal penalties; and WHEREAS, other cities have adopted civil penalties for such Code violations and have found that imposition of a monetary penalty allows recovery of administrative costs of enforcement and is often an incentive to prompt compliance; and WHEREAS, a change to civil from criminal penalties would also make prosecution of these violations more effective, since "knowing and wilful" commission of a violation is necessary to obtain a criminal conviction; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES ;: HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS : Section 1. Section 14 . 24 . 010 (Section 11 of Ord. 2517) of the Kent City Code is hereby repealed. i! iI 'i II j` �I 1' I; l� I Section 2. The Kent City Code is hereby amended to add ;; the following new Chapter 14.24 : l i I� I CHAPTER 14.24 ENFORCEMENT OF THE BUILDING. HOUSING MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING CODES 14.24 .020. Definitions. For the purposes of this Chapter, certain terms, phrases, words and their derivations shall be construed as set forth in this section: A. "Building Official" means the Building official of the City of Kent and/or the Building Official 's duly authorized representative. B. "Code(s) " means any or all of the Building, Housing, Mechanical and Plumbing Codes, as duly adopted by the City of Kent. C. "Premises" means a plot of ground, whether occupied by a structure or not. i! 14.24. 040. Administration and Enforcement. A. It shall be the duty of the Building official to enforce the Codes in the manner generally described in each of the respective Codes, and as more particularly described in this ;! Chapter. The Building Official may call upon the police, fire or i' other appropriate City department to assist in enforcement. it i i 2 i j �� i I� I Ili +III B. It is the intent of this Chapter to place the obligation of complying with Code requirements upon the owner, ` occupier or other person responsible for the condition of the buildings, structures, dwelling units or premises within the scope lof the Codes. C. In case of conflict between the Code(s) or K.C.C. jChapter 14 . 01 and this Chapter, this Chapter shall be controlling. 14.24 .060 . Investigation and Notice of Violation. A. The Building Official or his/her representative shall investigate any building, structure, dwelling unit or premises which the Building Official reasonably believes does not ' comply with the standards and requirements of the Code(s) . B. If, after investigation, the Building Official determines that the Code(s) standards or requirements have been ' violated, the Building Official shall serve a Notice of Violation on the owner, tenant, or other person responsible for the condition. If a Notice of Violation is directed to a tenant or !! other person responsible for the violation, a copy of the notice !; shall also be sent to the owner of the property. C. The Notice of Violation shall state separately each standard or requirement violated, shall state what corrective action, if any, is necessary to comply with the standards or requirements; and shall set a reasonable time for compliance. The , Notice shall state that any subsequent violations of the Code(s) may result in criminal prosecution as provided in Section 14 . 24 . 240 ;i herein. 3 jl ii j I D. The Notice shall be served upon the owner, tenant or other person responsible for the condition of the building, dwelling unit and/or premises by personal service, registered mail, or certified mail with return receipt requested, addressed to the last known address of such person. After a reasonable search and 'Treasonable efforts are made to obtain service, if the whereabouts I, i!, of the person(s) is unknown or service cannot be accomplished and jthe Building official makes an affidavit to that effect, then ' service of the Notice upon such person(s) may be made by: 1. Publishing the Notice once each week for two (2) consecutive weeks in the City's Official Newspaper; and 2 . Mailing a copy of the Notice to each person named on the Notice of Violation by first class mail to the last known address if known, or if unknown, to the address of the ,, property involved in the proceedings. E. A copy of the Notice shall be posted at a conspicuous place on the premises, unless posting the Notice is not physically possible. F. Nothing in this Section shall be deemed to limit or preclude any action or proceeding pursuant to a Stop Work Order 'iissued pursuant to any applicable Code or ordinance; an Emergency Order issued pursuant to Section 14 . 24 . 120 herein, or an action ;; pursuant to the Kent Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous IlBuildings in order to abate a nuisance. I' G. The Building Official may mail, or cause to be delivered to all residential and/or nonresidential rental units in li 4 i ;` i 1 i 1 I1the structure, or post at a conspicuous place on the premises, a j 11notice which informs each recipient or resident about the Notice of lViolation, Stop Work Order or Emergency order and the applicable �jrequirements and procedures. I H. A Notice may be amended at any time in order to: 1. Correct clerical errors, or 2 . Cite additional authority for a stated violation. 14.24.080. Time to Comply. A. When calculating a reasonable time for compliance, the Building Official shall consider the following criteria: 1. The type and degree of violation cited in the Notice; 2 . The responsible party' s demonstrated intent to repair, demolish or vacate and close the building, as evidenced by: a) a signed construction contract with a licensed contractor to perform the required work by a specific date and for reasonable compensation; b) proof of the availability of financial resources to perform the required work with such funds placed in a segregated account to be used only for required repairs or a 5 �i i H I I I I. Ili I I{ � 1 binding commitment from an established lending institution ! providing sufficient funds to complete the required repairs; or i c) the filing of a complete application for i'la permit to perform the required work and evidence of payment of �lany required fees. 'I i! i 3 . The procedural requirements for obtaining any ;: required permit to carry out corrective action; 4 . The complexity of the corrective action, including seasonal considerations, construction requirements and ;, the legal prerogatives of landlords and tenants; and 5. Any other circumstances beyond the control of I; the responsible party. I' B. Unless a request for a review of the Notice of I�, Violation is made in accordance with Section 14 . 24 . 140 herein, the j! Notice shall become the Final Order of the Building Official. A ;, copy of the Notice or Order shall be filed with the King County i; Department of Records and Elections, except that the Building i Official may choose not to file a copy of the Notice or Order if 'I the Notice or Order is directed only to a responsible person other !' than the owner of the property. 14.24.100 . Stop Work Order. The Building Official may ' issue a Stop Work Order as described in any applicable Code(s) , or 1may issue such Order whenever a continuing violation of the Code(s) will materially impair the Building Official ' s ability to secure I I! 6 ;i I i I I II compliance, or when a continuing violation threatens the health or safety of the public. 14 .24. 120. Emergency Order. A. Whenever any building, dwelling unit and/or premises (:, which violates the Code(s) threatens the health and safety of the occupants of the building, dwelling unit, premises or any member of (' the public, the Building Official may issue an Emergency Order requiring that the building, dwelling unit and/or premises be restored to a condition of safety, and specify the time set for compliance. In the alternative, the Order may require that the building, dwelling unit and/or premises be immediately vacated and closed to entry. B. The Emergency Order shall be posted on the building, dwelling unit and/or premises and shall be mailed by regular, first ,, class mail to the last known address of the owners, and if lapplicable, to the occupants. C. Any building, dwelling unit and/or premises subject to an Emergency Order which is not repaired within the time specified in the Order is hereby found and declared to be a public 'I nuisance, which the Building Official is authorized to abate by such means and with such assistance as may be available to him/her, , and the costs thereof shall be recovered by the Building Official i in the manner provided by law. 7 I I, ;I I 'I i� I 14.24.140. Review by the Building Official. i A. Any person aggrieved by a Notice of Violation issued I by the Building Official pursuant to Section 14 . 24 . 060 herein may obtain a review of the Notice by requesting such review within ; fifteen (15) days after service of the Notice. When the last day Ilof the period so computed is a Saturday, Sunday or federal or City ; holiday, the period shall run until five p.m. (5: 00 p.m. ) on the ;, next business day. The request shall be in writing, and upon receipt of the request, the Building Official shall notify any persons served the Notice of Violation and the complainant, if any, of the date, time and place set for the review, which shall be not less than ten (10) , nor more than twenty (20) days after the !! request is received. The Building Official may, upon good cause, postpone the date set for a review, if all persons served with the jNotice of Violation agree to such postponement. Before the date 11set for review, a person significantly affected by the Notice of Violation may submit any written material to the Building Official " for consideration at the review. B. The review will consist of an informal meeting held in the Code Enforcement Department offices. A representative of the Building Official, such as the Assistant Fire Chief in charge of the City's Code Enforcement Division, will attend. An explanation shall be given of the reasons for the Building Official ' s issuance of the Notice and the representative will g listen to any additional information presented by the persons attending. At or after the review, the Building Official or this !! representative may: i� 1. Sustain the Notice of Violation; 8 I� I I. !1 � I 'I 'I i2 . Withdraw the Notice of Violation; I� 3 . Continue the review to a date certain for ' receipt of additional information; or 4 . Modify the Notice of Violation, which may include an extension of the compliance date. C. The Building Official shall issue a Final Order containing the decision within seven (7) working days of the date of the completion of the review and shall cause the same to be mailed by regular, first class mail to the person or persons named on the Notice of Violation, mailed to the complainant, if possible, and filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections. When the decision affects only a tenant or tenants, the Building - ' Official is not required to file the Final Order with the King County Department of Records and Elections. 14.24 . 160 . Extension of Compliance Date. A. The Building Official may grant an extension of time for compliance with any Notice or Order whether pending or final, upon finding that substantial progress toward compliance has been made and that the public will not be adversely affected by the extension. B. An extension of time may be revoked by the Building Official if it is shown that the conditions at the time the extension was granted have changed, if the Building Official determines that a party is not performing corrective actions as agreed, or if the extension creates an adverse effect on the I 9 I'. i i JI � 1il1 �I 1 public. The date of revocation shall then be considered as the I compliance date. �I i 14.24.160. Appeals to superior Court. Any appeal of a jFinal Order issued by the Building Official pursuant to this lChapter or the Code(s) must be filed in the King County Superior i i, Court within thirty (30) days of issuance. There shall be no �lappeal of a Notice of Violation if no request for review has been �imade pursuant to Section 14 .24 . 140. 14 .24.200. Violations. A. It shall be unlawful to fail to comply with a Notice of Violation, Final Order or Stop Work Order issued pursuant to ,. this Chapter or the Code(s) . B. It shall be unlawful to remove or deface any sign, notice, complaint or order required by or posted by the Building Official in accordance with his/her enforcement duties under the Code(s) and this Chapter. C. It shall be unlawful for any person to obstruct, : impede or interfere with any lawful attempt to correct a violation ' or comply with any Notice of Violation, Final Order, Emergency ; Order or Stop Work Order. D. It shall be unlawful for any person to fail to 1comply with an Emergency Order issued by the Building Official 11 requiring that the building, dwelling unit and/or premises be 11restored to a condition of safety by a specified time. I! �1 10 I �I ' i' I 1 I' E. It shall be unlawful for any person to use or ( occupy, or to cause or permit any person to use or occupy the I I� building, dwelling unit and/or premises after the date provided in Ian Emergency Order requiring the building, dwelling unit and/or premises to be vacated and closed, until the Building Official certifies that the conditions described in the Emergency Order have been corrected and the building, dwelling unit and/or premises have been restored to a safe condition. 14.24.220 . civil Penalty. A. In addition to any other sanction or remedial procedure which may be available, any person violating or failing to comply with any of the provisions of the Codes) or this Chapter shall be subject to a cumulative penalty in the amount of three hundred dollars ($300. 00) per day for each violation from the date set for compliance until the corrections are made as described in the Order. B. The penalty imposed by this section shall be collected by civil action brought in the name of the City. The Building Official shall notify the City Attorney in writing of the name of any person subject to the penalty, and the City Attorney shall, with the assistance of the Building Official, take appropriate action to collect the penalty. C. The violator may show as full or partial mitigation of liability: 1. That the violation giving rise to the action 1! was caused by the wilful act, or neglect, or abuse of another; or is I i li it it I I �.r I 2 . That correction of the violation was commenced promptly upon receipt of the Notice thereof, but that full compliance within the time specified was prevented by inability to I obtain necessary materials or labor, inability to gain access to jthe subject structure, or other condition or circumstance beyond I! the control of the violator. 14.24.240. criminal Penalties. A. Any person, firm or corporation violating the following provisions shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punishable in accordance with the provisions of K.C.C. Section 1. 02 . 020 (Ordinance 3013) relating to criminal penalties for misdemeanors. 1. Violations of Section 14 . 24 .200 (B) ; 2 . Violations of Section 14 . 24 .200 (D) and (E) , where the person has had a civil judgment under Section 14 . 24 .220 ;,' or any of its predecessors rendered against him or her during the last five (5) years; 3 . For any pattern of wilful, intentional, or bad rfaith or refusal to comply with the standards or requirements of this chapter. 4 . For any other violation of the Code(s) for ;, which corrective action is not possible. it i I' 12 I it i if j� � 1 B. Each day that anyone shall continue to violate or fail to comply with any of the foregoing provisions shall be considered a separate offense. 14.24.260. Additional Relief. The Building Official may ' " seek legal or equitable relief to enjoin any acts and practices and abate any condition which constitutes or will constitute a violation of the Codes when civil or criminal penalties are inadequate to effect compliance. Nothing in this ordinance shall be deemed to limit or preclude any action or proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings. section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final passage as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: i BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK 13 l7' Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 . 1992 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: 1991 EDITION OF UNIFORM FIRE CODE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Staff requests the adoption of the 1991 edition of the Uniform Fire Code. This code has received extensive review by the State Building Code Council and has been approved. The State Legislature has passed this code into law which is effective July 1, 1992 . The action by the City Council will bring the City Code in alignment with State law. Any local amendments to this code must be passed by the Local Governmental Agency and presented to the State six months prior to adoption. As of this date, City staff does not intend to recommend any local amendments. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee /fMannr (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commiss' n, etc. ) 5. IINBIIDGETED FISCAL PERSONNEL IMPAC NO_�� YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommen d Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember 4seconds adoption of Ordinance - L.' adopting the 1991 edition of the Uniform Fire Code. DISCUSSION• (- ACTION: t4 6/1 Council Agenda Item No. 4EX i tl l i II I i i I I I i j ORDINANCE NO. I I AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to fire prevention; amend- ing Chapter 13 . 02 Kent City Code (KCC) to adopt the Uniform Fire Code, 1991 edition, with certain amendments thereto. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent has determined that the enactment of comprehensive, uniform building regulations will promote the health, safety and welfare of the t, citizens of Kent; and WHEREAS, such regulations include fire regulations which define minimum performance standards and requirements for construction and construction materials, consistent with accepted standards of engineering, fire and life safety; and 'i WHEREAS, the enactment of such fire regulations is ' consistent with the mandate of RCW 19 . 27. 020; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 13 . 02 . 010 of the Kent City Code (Ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is amended as follows: 13 . 02 . 010 UNIFORM FIRE CODE--ADOPTED. There is adopted by reference upon the effective date of this ordinance '! and upon the filing with the City Clerk of one copy thereof, the i� 'i �j I! I �I 1 Uniform Fire Code, ( (19 8S) ) 1991 Edition, promulgated by the International Conference of Building Officials and the Western Fire Chiefs Association, as amended by Chapter 51-24 of the Washington Administrative Code as currently enacted and as '; amended from time to time also hereby adopted by reference, together with ( (Arppend•ix III A—therete, and) ) deletions, ; amendments and additions thereto as set forth in this Chapter. Section 2 . Chapter 13 . 02 . 020 of the Kent City Code (Ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is amended as follows: 13 . 02 . 020. UNIFORM FIRE CODE--ADDITION--SECTION ( ("s-G8) ) 4 . 109 . Article 4 of the Uniform Fire Code, ( (3:988) ) 1991 Edition, is amended by adding a new section thereto, which shall be designated as Section 4 . 109 and which shall read as follows: PERMIT FEES. The Fire Chief is authorized to prepare a schedule of fees applicable to fire permits and certificates hereafter issued, commensurate with the cost of administration and inspection involved in the processing, issuance and renewal of such permits and certificates. Any such schedule, when adopted by the City Council by resolution, shall govern the amount of the fee for any permit or certificate, which shall be collected by the Fire Department as a condition to issuance or renewal. a) Permits shall be valid for a 12 month period and are renewable at the end of that time. 2 i I; i i b) All schools and churches shall be exempt from the fee requirements of this ordinance, however, required permits shall be issued only after inspections are performed and compliance is obtained. c) Failure to pay for either an original �j permit or the required renewal within 30 days of the notice date shall constitute a violation of this code ( (erd anee) ) . ( (ARY time fixed herein, shall for eaeh and every W days. ) ) Section 3 . Chapter 13 . 02 . 030 of the Kent City Code ' (Ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is ', amended as follows: 13 . 02 . 030. UNIFORM FIRE CODE--ADDITION--SECTION 10. 210. There is hereby added to the Uniform Fire Code, ( (19a8) ) 1991 Edition, a new section to be designated as Section 10. 210 Fire Lanes, to read as follows: I j' 3 �j I I I' I I Section 10. 210. Fire Lanes. a) Definitions. The following definitions shall apply in the interpretation and enforcement of this Section: i i 1. Fire Lane: That area within any public right of way, easement, or private property designated provided, and maintained in accordance with this section for the purpose of permitting fire apparatus and other fire fighting or emergency equipment to use, travel upon or park. 2 . Park Parking Stop Stand or Standing: Means the halting of any vehicle, other than an emergency vehicle, whether occupied or not, except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or in compliance with the directions of a police officer or fire official, traffic control sign or signal. 3 . Vehicle: A machine propelled by power other than human power designed to travel along the ground or rail by use of wheels, treads, runners or slides and transport persons or property, or pull machinery, and shall include, but not be limited to, automobile, truck, trailer, motorcycle, tractor, buggy, wagon and locomotive. b Re irements Standards. When required by the fire gu � department, fire lanes shall be provided and maintained around facilities which by their size, location, design, or contents warrant access which exceed that normally provided i' by the proximity of city streets. Such fire lanes shall it conform to the following: I' 4 1j v I 11 l I II I I i I i 1. Lanes shall conform to requirements in Section 1 10. 207 . 2 . Vertical curbs shall be identified by a bright yellow 6-inch wide stripe on the top and side �i extending the length of the designated fire lane. 'i minimum 4-inch red lettering, which shall read "No Parking - Fire Lane" , shall be placed every 30 feet or portion thereof on the top and sides of the curb. 3 . Rolled curbs or lanes without curbs shall be identified by a bright yellow 6-inch wide stripe on the curb or pavement extending the length of the designated fire lane. Minimum 3-inch red lettering, which shall read "No Parking - Fire Lane" , shall be placed every 30 feet or portion thereof on the top of the rolled curb or pavement. 4 . Fire lane signs shall be installed per the following information: signs shall be metal, reflective in nature with red letters on a white background. Signs shall state "No Parking - Fire Lane" . Signs shall be posted on or immediately next to the curb line or on the building. When posts are required, they shall be a minimum of 2- inch galvanized steel or 4" x 4" pressure treated wood. Signs shall be readily readable from at least a 50-foot distance. Signs shall be posted no further than 50 feet apart, nor shall they be more than 9 feet or less than 7 feet from the ii 5 �I i i� I li II �I I 1 a ground. Signs shall be placed so that they face 11 the direction of vehicular travel. i j 5. Where fire lanes connect to city streets or parking lots, adequate clearances and turning radii shall be provided. All proposed plans shall ihave fire department approval. (c) Parking Prohibited. Except when necessary to temporarily avoid conflict with other moving traffic or in compliance with the direction of a police officer, fire official, traffic control sign, signal, or device, no person shall : 1. Stop, stand or park a vehicle, whether occupied or not within any fire lane except: A) Momentarily to pick up or discharge a passenger or passengers; or B) Temporarily for the purposes of and while actually engaged in loading or unloading property. 2 . Allow continued violations of this section on private property which they own or manage. (d) Fire Lane as Part of Driveways and/or Parking Areas. The fire department may require that areas specified for use jas driveways or private thoroughfares shall not be used for I� �I i 6 l I I i I parking. These areas when specified, shall be marked or identified by the two means detailed in Section (b) 2 . I i (e) Existing Buildings. When the fire department determines that a hazard due to inaccessibility of fire apparatus exists around existing building, they may require fire lanes to be constructed and maintained as detailed in (b) and (d) . i (f) Penalties. Any violation of the provisions of Subsection (c) above shall be a traffic infraction punishable by a monetary penalty of not more than two hundred ($200) dollars. The recommended bail for such a violation shall be fifty (50) dollars plus state assessments and costs, when applicable. (g) Impound of Illegally Parked Vehicles. In addition to the penalties provided for in Subsection (f) , any vehicle improperly parked in violation of any of the provisions of this Section shall be subject to impound; provided, however, that other than in the event of an emergency, no such vehicle shall be impounded unless the area where the improper parking occurs shall be adequately and suitably posted with signs advising that improperly parked vehicles are subject to impound. (h) Property owner Responsibility. Fire lane markings shall be maintained at the expense of the property owner(s) i as often as needed to clearly identify the designated area as being a fire lane. The owner, manager, or person in charge of any property upon which designated fire lanes have i li 7 f� I ;f ! i 1 been established, shall prevent the parking of vehicles or placement of other obstructions in such fire lanes. Section 4 . Chapter 13 . 02 . 040 of the Kent City Code ,'! (Ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is ! amended as follows: 13 . 02 . 040 UNIFORM FIRE CODE-AMENDMENT-SECTION ( (18-30) ) 10.507 ( (Geetien 1 02 0 n f the vent Git Ged is hereby lamended as fell ^ s., ) ) Section ( (moo) ) 10. 507 of Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code is adopted by reference with the following amendments thereto: Section ( (moo) ) 10. 507 (a) ( (Where Required. ) ) General. An automatic fire- extinguishing system shall be installed in the occupancies and locations as set forth in this section. 1. "When additions, alterations or repairs cause a �' building to come within the requirements of this Article, the ibuilding shall comply with those Sections; PROVIDED, however, ,, that when a church building is increased in size, the sanctuary, . and only the sanctuary, may be exempt from the provisions of this Section if: A. A heat and smoke detector system is installed with ; a 24 hour supervised central, proprietary or remote station. The ;: system and supervising station agency shall be approved by the jchief, and B. The sanctuary for purposes of this section shall ', mean only that portion of the church used for worship services, `I 8 ,I � li i i I i i and shall not include multipurpose rooms or facilities, or rooms i for facilities accessory to the sanctuary. i Prior to approval by the fire department all automatic ( sprinkler systems designed with 50 or more heads, excluding those ( designed for single and multifamily dwellings, shall be submitted jto and reviewed by an approved agency for compliance with the ;; current adopted fire codes. Approved agencies include, but are ! not limited to, Washington Survey and Rating Bureau, Factory ;! Mutual, Industrial Risk Insurers, or other such agencies as approved by the chief. " For ( (speelal) ) provisions on special hazards and hazardous ( (ehemieals) ) materials ( (magnesium, and eal e earblue, ) ) see Section 10. 501 and ( (45 . 209 and) ) Articles 45, 48, 49 and 80. �I 2 . "Notwithstanding any other requirements of this section, this code, or any other code or ordinance to the +i ! contrary, any building containing more that 12 , 000 square feet of ;; floor area shall be equipped with an approved automatic sprinkler system. Area separation walls, as noted in Section 505 (e) of the iUniform Building Code, shall not be considered to separate a ;, building to enable deletion of the required sprinkler system. " I (b) All Occupancies Except Group R, Division 3 and ! Group M. Except for Group R, Division 3 and Group M Occupancies, an automatic sprinkler system shall be installed: If 1. In every story or basement of all buildings 11when the floor area exceeds 1500 square feet and there is not i 9 I i provided at least 20 square feet of opening entirely above the I ladjoining ground level in each 50 lineal feet or fraction thereof ; iiiof exterior wall in the story or basement on at least one side of 11the building. Openings shall have a minimum dimension of not Bless than 30 inches. Such openings shall be accessible to the ,: .: fire department from the exterior and shall not be obstructed in is manner that firefighting or rescue cannot be accomplished from jthe exterior. When Openings in a story are provided on only : one side and the opposite wall of such story is more than 75 feet from such openings, the story shall be provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system, or openings as specified above shall :: be provided on at least two sides of an exterior wall of the story. i i' If any portion of a basement is located more than 75 feet from openings required in this section, the basement shall be provided with an approved automatic sprinkler system. 2 . At the top of rubbish and linen chutes and in ' their terminal rooms. Chutes extending through three or more i; floors shall have additional sprinkler heads installed within ,,; such chutes at alternate floors. Sprinkler heads shall be I !! accessible for servicing. 3 . In rooms where nitrate film is stored or ihandled. ji I 4 . In protected combustible fiber storage vaults �I i as defined in this code. i I I Ii I 10 i iI C. Group A. Occupancies. 1. Drinking Establishments. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in rooms used by the occu j ants for the consumption of alcoholic beverages and p ;unseparated accessory uses where the total area of such 11unseparated rooms and assembly uses exceeds 5, 000 square feet. For uses to be considered as separated, the separation shall not be less than as required for a one-hour occupancy separation. The area of other uses shall be included unless separated by at '' least a one-hour occupancy separation. 2 . Basements. An automatic sprinkler system '' shall be installed in basements classified as a Group A Occupancy ,, when the basement is larger than 1, 500 square feet in floor area. 3 . Exhibition and display rooms. An automatic , sprinkler system shall be installed in Group A Occupancies which have more than 12, 000 square feet of floor area which can be used for exhibition or display purposes. 4 . Stairs. An automatic sprinkler system shall ;; be installed in enclosed usable space below or over a stairway in iGroup A, Divisions 2 , 2 . 1, 3 and 4 Occupancies. 5. Multitheater Complexes Every building !'; containing a multitheater complex. 6. Amusement buildings An automatic sprinkler �isystem shall be installed in all amusement buildings. The main ;; water flow switch shall be electrically supervised. The I li fi II li i I i i I it ._I sprinkler main cutoff valve shall be supervised. When the amusement building is temporary, the sprinkler water-supply system may be of an approved temporary type. j I EXCEPTION• An automatic sprinkler system �i need not be provided when the floor area of a temporary_ amusement building is less than 1, 000 scruare feet and the exit travel distance from any point is less _than 50 feet. Other areas. An automatic sprinkler system !' shall be installed under the roof and gridiron, in the tie and ii ' fly galleries and in all places behind the proscenium wall of stages; over and within permanent platforms in excess of 500 square feet in area; and in dressing rooms, workshops and storerooms accessory to such stages or permanent platforms. EXCEPTIONS• i 1. Stages or platforms open to the auditorium room on three or more sides. 2 . Altars, pulpits or similar platforms and their accessory rooms. 3 . Stage gridirons when side-wall sprinklers with 135°F. rated head with heat-baffle plates are installed around the entire perimeter of the stage except for the proscenium openings at points not more than 30 inches below the gridiron or more than 6 inches below the it baffle plate. i i 12 � I 1� iI ICI A. IfIf II I fl !I f 4. Under stage or under platform areas less than 4 feet in clear height used exclusively for chair or table storage and lined on the inside with materials approved for one-hour fire-resistive construction. I I; (d) Group B, Division 2 Occupancies. An automatic ;; sprinkler system shall be installed in retail sales rooms classed as Group B, Division 2 Occupancies where the floor area exceeds 12 , 000 square feet or any floor or 24 , 000 square feet on all . floors or in Group B, Division 2 retail sales occupancies more than three stories in height. The area of mezzanines shall be included in determining the areas where sprinklers are required. (e) Group E. Occupancies. 1. Basements. An automatic sprinkler system ' shall be installed in basements classified as a Group E Occupancy ,:,: when the basement is large than 1500 square feet in floor area. 2 . Stairs. An automatic sprinkler system shall , be installed in enclosed usable space below or over a stairway in i ;; Group E Occupancies. 3 . Division 1. An approved automatic fire- extinguishing system shall be installed in all newly constructed .: buildings classifed as E-1 Occupancies constructed after July 1, 1992 . NOTE: For the purpose of this section, structural I'. additions exceeding 60% of the appraised value of such building or structure, or alterations and ICI w 13 i i I i i ?I �v repairs to any portion of a building or structure within a twelve month period that exceeds 100% of the appraised value of such building or structure shall be considered new construction. In the case of structural additions, separation walls shall define separate buildings. EXCEPTION: Portable school classrooms, provided: A. Aggregate area of clusters of portable school classrooms does not exceed 5,000 square feet; and B. Clusters of portable school classrooms separated as required in Chapter 5 of the Building Code. When not required by other provisions of this chapter, a fire- extinguishing system installed in accordance with UBC Standard iNo. 38-1 may be used for area and height increases and substitution for one-hour construction as allowed by the Building , Code. (f) Group H. Occupancies. 1. Division 1. An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed in Group H, Divisions 1, 2 , 3 , and 7 Occupancies. 2. Division 4 . An automatic fire-extinguishing . system shall be installed in Group H, Division 4 Occupancies having a floor area of more than 3000 square feet. i i 14 i; f 4 pan I 3 . Division 6. An automatic fire-extinguishing system shall be installed throughout buildings containing Group 1H, Division 6 Occupancies. The design of the sprinkler system ' Shall be not less than that required by the Building Code ( (fir �, U.B.G. Standard—Ne38 z) ) for the occupancy hazard ( classification as follows: I OCCUPANCY HAZARD LOCATION CLASSIFICATION Fabrication areas Ordinary Hazard Group 3 Service corridors Ordinary Hazard Group 3 Storage rooms without dispensing Ordinary Hazard Group 3 Storage rooms with dispensing Extra Hazard Group 2 Exit corridors Ordinary Hazard Group 31 When the design area of the sprinkler system consists of a corridor protected by one row of sprinklers, the maximum !, number of sprinklers that need be calculated is 13 . (g) Group I occupancies. An automatic sprinkler _ system shall be installed in Group I Occupancies. EXCEPTIONS : In jails, prisons and reformatories, the piping system may be dry, provided a manually operated valve is installed at a continuously monitored location. Opening of valve will cause the piping system to be charged. Sprinkler heads in such system shall be equipped with fusible elements or i� 15 I� � I I it the system shall be designed as required for 1jdeluge systems ( (-in) ) by the Building Code. See ! U.B.C. Standard No. 38-1. la ' I� f! (h) Group R, Division 1 Occupancies. An automatic I, ;: sprinkler system shall be installed throughout every apartment !' house three or more stories in height or containing 16 or more I!, ( (tha , 3:5) ) dwelling units, in congregate residences three or ,,, more stories in height and having an occupant load of _50 or more, and ( (every) ) in hotels three or more stories in height or containing 20 or more guest rooms. Residential or quick-response standard sprinkler heads shall be used in the dwelling unit and guest room portions of the building. Section 5. Chapter 13 . 02 of the Kent City Code (ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is amended by the addition of Section 13 . 02 . 050 to read as follows: 13 . 02 . 050. UNIFORM FIRE CODE APPENDICES ADOPTED. Appendices II-F and III-A of the Uniform Fire Code 1991 Edition, are hereby adopted. Section 6. Section 13 . 02 . 060 of the Kent City Code (Ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is hereby amended as follows: ( (13 . 02 . 060. UNIFORM FIRE CODE--ADDITION--SECTION 10. 207 There is hereby included in the Uniform Fire Code, it ( (1985) ) 1991 edition, a new section to be designated Section 10. 207, as follows: I' 16 i' I' +I f I I A. General . Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with the provisions of this i section. B. Where Required. Fire apparatus access roads shall ! be required for every building hereafter constructed when any portion of an exterior wall of the first story is located more ;! than 150 feet from fire department vehicle access. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When conditions prevent the installation of an approved fire apparatus access road, the chief may permit the installation of a fire- protection system or systems in lieu of a road, provided the system or systems are not otherwise required by this or any other code. 2 . When there are not more than two Group R, Division 3 or Group M occupancies, the requirements of this section may be modified, provided, in the opinion of the chief, fire-fighting or rescue operations would not be impaired. i C. Permissible Modifications. Clearances or widths required by this section may be increased when, in the opinion of the chief, minimum clearances or widths are not adequate to ;, provide fire apparatus access. For high-piled combustible ;; storage, see Section 81. 109 . D. Surface. Fire apparatus access roads shall be ! designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire U ii ii " I 17 I i i I I I I i! apparatus and shall be provided with a surface so as to provide ;fall-weather driving capabilities. { E. Width. The minimum unobstructed width of a fire liapparatus access road shall be not less than 20 feet. n F. Vertical Clearance. All fire apparatus access I; roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. EXCEPTION: Upon approval, vertical clearance may be reduced, provided such reduction does not impair access by fire apparatus and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating the established vertical clearance. G. Turning Radius. The turning radius of a fire apparatus access road shall be as approved by the chief. H. Turnarounds. All dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire apparatus. I. Bridges. When a bridge is required to be used as access under this section, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the applicable sections of the Building Code land using designed live loading sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. J. Grade. The gradient for a fire apparatus access '' road shall not exceed 12% unless otherwise approved by the Chief. is 18 i II i i i I. Obstruction. The required width of any fire apparatus access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, ;( including parking of vehicles. Minimum required widths and ; clearances established under this section shall be maintained at :,, all times. (0.2663) ) ) Section 7 . Chapter 13 . 02 of the Kent City Code (Ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is hereby amended by the addition thereto of Section 13 . 02 . 080, to read as follows: 13 . 02 . 080 UNIFORM FIRE CODE STANDARDS ADOPTED. There is adopted by reference upon the filing of one copy thereof with the Kent City Clerk a certain document known as the Uniform Fire Code Standards 1991 Edition as amended by Chapter 51-25 of the Washington Administrative Code as currently enacted and as amended from time to time also hereby adopted by reference. Section 8. Chapter 13 . 02 of the Kent City Code (Ordinances 2663 and 2920 as last amended by Ordinance 3020) is hereby amended by the addition of Section 13 . 02 . 100. to read as follows: 13 . 02 . 100. SECTIONS DELETED. Sections 2 . 207 , 3 . 101, 3 . 102 , 3 . 103 and 3 . 104 of the Uniform Fire Code 1991 Edition are hereby repealed. 19 I I I� Section 9 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take leffect and be in force thirty (30) day from the date of its final 1passage as provided by law. I DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ' ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the day of , 1992 . APPROVED the day of , 1992 • PUBLISHED the day of 1992 . I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance No. _ , passed by the City Council of City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK ufc.ord 20 1 Ii �I ii Ii ....... .... Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS OF UNIFORM FIRE CODE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Staff requests the adoption of an ordinance providing for a civil penalty process for violations of the Uniform Fire Code, at the same time repealing the criminal penalties from the Kent City Code. This proposed process is very similar to the Zoning Code Penalty Ordinance and will provide a more consistent enforcement of the City Codes. It will also remove the criminal aspect of violating the Uniform Fire Code for first time offenders, and replace it with a civil procedure. 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee /(Mann (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commissi n, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERSONNEL IMPA T: NO� YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recomme ed Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember ►' `u'lvr-) moves, Councilmember seconds L' h adoption of Ordinance � enacting a civil penalty procedure for violation of the Uniform Fire Code. DISCUSSION. �u ACTION. Ll Council Age�da Item No. 4F �(II i 1 ! 1 1� 1 ORDINANCE NO. I� AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to Fire Code en- forcement, adding a new Chapter 13 . 14 on enforcement, providing both civil and criminal penalties for violations; and repealing Section 13 . 10. 010 of the Kent City Code. WHEREAS, the Kent Fire Code (adopted by the City of Kent under 13 . 02 . 010, Ordinance 2920) presently contains abbreviated procedures for the enforcement of Code violations and makes such violations a criminal offense; and 'i WHEREAS, other cities have adopted civil penalties for Code violations and have found that imposition of a monetary penalty allows recovery of administrative costs of enforcement and is often an incentive to prompt compliance, and WHEREAS, a change to civil from criminal penalties for some violations would also make prosecution of these violations more effective, since "knowing and wilful" commission of a violation is necessary to obtain a criminal conviction; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES ! HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: I' u Section 1. Kent City Code (K.C.C. ) Chapter 13 . 10 (Section 4 of Ordinance 2663) is hereby repealed. i, i i I i `r i Section 2. The Kent City Code is hereby amended to add , the following new Chapter 13 . 14 : CHAPTER 13.14 ENFORCEMENT OF TITLE 13 jj 13. 14.020. Scope. This Chapter shall govern enforcement ':.' actions conducted by the Kent Fire Chief pursuant to Title 13 of ' the Kent City Code, which includes the Uniform Fire Code (as !: adopted by K.C.C. Section 13 . 02 . 010) . 13.14.040. Administration and Enforcement. A. It shall be the duty of the Fire Chief to enforce Title 13 in the manner generally described therein, in the Fire ;! Code, and as more particularly described in this Chapter. The Fire�, Chief may call upon the police or other appropriate City department ;; to assist in enforcement. B. It is the intent of this Chapter to place the obligation of complying with its requirements upon the owner, occupier or other person responsible for the condition of the buildings, structures, dwelling units or premises within the scope : of Title 13 . C. In case of conflict between the enforcement 1 procedures in the Fire Code and this Chapter, this Chapter shall be controlling. 'I ii I' i, 2 �I i I I I I I 13.14.060. Investigation and Notice of Violation. A. The Fire Chief or his/her representative shall I investigate any building, structure, dwelling unit or premises which the Fire Chief reasonably believes does not comply with the III standards and requirements of Title 13 . it B. If, after investigation, the Fire Chief determines jthat the Code standards or requirements have been violated, the Fire Chief shall serve a Notice of Violation on the owner, tenant, or other person responsible for the condition. If a Notice of Violation is directed to a tenant or other person responsible for the violation, a copy of the notice shall also be sent to the owner , of the property. C. The Notice of Violation shall state separately each standard or requirement violated, shall state what corrective action, if any, is necessary to comply with the standards or ; requirements; and shall set a reasonable time for compliance. The , Notice shall state that any subsequent violations of Title 13 may 11result in criminal prosecution as provided in Section 13 . 14 . 240 ,, herein. I D. The Notice shall be served upon the owner, tenant or ; other person responsible for the condition of the building, dwelling unit and/or premises by personal service, registered mail, or certified mail with return receipt requested, addressed to the last known address of such person. After a reasonable search and reasonable efforts are made to obtain service, if the whereabouts jof the person(s) is unknown or service cannot be accomplished and j! 11 3 �I I it I i the Fire Chief makes an affidavit to that effect, then service of , the Notice upon such person(s) may be made by: 1. Publishing the Notice once each week for two i i (2) consecutive weeks in the city's Official Newspaper; and I 2 . Mailing a copy of the Notice to each person ', named on the Notice of Violation by first class mail to the last known address if known, or if unknown, to the address of the property involved in the proceedings. E. A copy of the Notice shall be posted at a conspicuous place on the premises, unless posting the Notice is not physically possible. F. Nothing in this Section shall be deemed to limit or`-' preclude any action or proceeding pursuant to a Stop Use Order issued pursuant to Section ( (2 .2G4) ) 2 . 205 of the Uniform Fire Code; an Emergency Order issued pursuant to Section 13 . 14 . 120 herein; a Condemnation Tag issued pursuant to Section ( (2 . 294) ) 2 . 205 of the Uniform Fire Code, or an action pursuant to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings in order to abate a nuisance. G. The Fire Chief may mail, or cause to be delivered to all residential and/or nonresidential rental units in the structure, or post at a conspicuous place on the premises, a notice which informs each recipient or resident about the Notice of Violation, Stop Use Order, Condemnation Tag or Emergency Order and i; the applicable requirements and procedures. i i i 4 li li i� i' 11 1 1 H. A Notice may be amended at any time in order to: 1. Correct clerical errors, or 2 . Cite additional authority for a stated ,,: violation. - 13.14.080. Time to Comply. A. When calculating a reasonable time for compliance, the Fire Chief shall consider the following criteria: 1. The type and degree of violation cited in the Notice; 2 . The responsible party's demonstrated intent to repair, demolish or vacate and close the building, as evidenced by: a) a signed construction contract with a licensed contractor to perform the required work by a specific date and for reasonable compensation; iI b) proof of the availability of financial resources to perform the required work with such funds placed in a segregated account to be used only for required repairs or a binding commitment from an established lending institution j; providing sufficient funds to complete the required repairs; or i' c) the filing of a complete application for is permit to perform the required work and evidence of payment of luny required fees. i 5 j 11 1I i I I 3 . The procedural requirements for obtaining any j H required permit to carry out corrective action; 4 . The complexity of the corrective action, , including seasonal considerations, construction requirements and the legal prerogatives of landlords and tenants; and 5. Any other circumstances beyond the control of the responsible party. B. Unless a request for a review of the Notice of Violation is made in accordance with Section 13 . 14 . 140 herein, the Notice shall become the Final Order of the Fire Chief. A copy of the Notice or Order shall be filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections, except that the Fire Chief may choose not to file a copy of the Notice or Order if the Notice or Order is- directed only to a responsible person other than the owner of the . property. 13.14. 100. Stop Use Order. The Fire Chief may issue a Stop Use Order as described in Section ( (2 . 204) ) 2 . 205 of the Uniform Fire Code, or may issue such Order whenever a continuing violation of Title 13 will materially impair the Fire Chief' s ability to secure compliance, or when a continuing violation threatens the health or safety of the public. 13 . 14. 120 . Emergency Order. A. Whenever any building, use, dwelling unit and/or : premises which violates Title 13 threatens the health and safety of the occupants of the building, dwelling unit, premises or any 6 j! II it ii i member of the public, the Fire Chief may issue an Emergency Order I ( requiring that the building, dwelling unit and/or premises be restored to a condition of safety, and specify the time set for ( compliance. In the alternative, the Order may require that the building, dwelling unit and/or premises be immediately vacated and i closed to entry. B. The Emergency Order shall be posted on the building, dwelling unit and/or premises and shall be mailed by regular, first class mail to the last known address of the owners, and if ' applicable, to the occupants. C. Any building, dwelling unit and/or premises subject to an Emergency Order which is not repaired within the time specified in the Order is hereby found and declared to be a public y nuisance, which the Fire Chief is authorized to abate by such means land with such assistance as may be available to him/her, and the costs thereof shall be recovered by the Fire Chief in the manner provided by law. 13. 14. 140. Review by the Fire Chief. i A. Any person aggrieved by a Notice of Violation issued by the Fire Chief pursuant to Section 13 . 14 . 060 herein may obtain a review of the Notice by requesting such review within fifteen ! (15) days after service of the Notice. When the last day of the ; period so computed is a Saturday, Sunday or federal or City ; holiday, the period shall run until five p.m. (5: 00 p.m. ) on the . next business day. The request shall be in writing, and upon receipt of the request, the Fire Chief shall notify any persons 11served the Notice of Violation and the complainant, if any, of the it 11 it I i if i If date, time and place set for the review, which shall be not less , than ten (10) , nor more than twenty (20) days after the request is received. The Fire Chief may, upon good cause, postpone the date I If set for a review, if all persons served with the Notice of , Violation agree to such postponement. Before the date set for , review, a person significantly affected by the Notice of Violation :, may submit any written material to the Fire Chief for consideration !; at the review. B. The review will consist of an informal meeting held in the Code Enforcement Division offices. A representative of the Fire Chief, such as the Assistant Fire Chief in charge of the City's Code Enforcement Division, will attend. An explanation will be given of the reasons for the Fire Chiefs issuance of the Notice and the representative will listen to any additional information ', presented by the persons attending. At or after the review, the -. ' Fire Chief or this representative may: 1. Sustain the Notice of Violation; 2 . Withdraw the Notice of Violation; , 3 . Continue the review to a date certain for ,' receipt of additional information; or 4 . Modify the Notice of Violation, which may include an extension of the compliance date. C. The Fire Chief shall issue a Final Order containing ; the decision within seven (7) working days of the date of the !; completion of the review and shall cause the same to be mailed by i {I i 8 i II I i 1 { I lregular, first class mail to the person or persons named on the jNotice of Violation, mailed to the complainant, if possible, and ; filed with the King County Department of Records and Elections. When the decision affects only a tenant or tenants, the Fire Chief I is not required to file the Final Order with the King County Department of Records and Elections. 13. 14. 160. Extension of Compliance Date. A. The Fire Chief may grant an extension of time for compliance with any Notice or Order whether pending or final, upon finding that substantial progress toward compliance has been made and that the public will not be adversely affected by the extension. B. An extension of time may be revoked by the Fire ; Chief if it is shown that the conditions at the time the extension was granted have changed, if the Fire Chief determines that a party is not performing corrective actions as agreed, or if the extension creates an adverse effect on the public. The date of revocation shall then be considered as the compliance date. 13.14.180. Appeals to superior Court. Any appeal of a Final Order issued by the Fire Chief pursuant to this Chapter must be filed in the King County Superior Court within thirty (30) days of issuance of such order. There shall be no appeal of a Notice of Violation if no request for review has been made pursuant to ,; Section 13 . 14 . 140. i j it 9 i it I 13,14,200. Violations. i A. It shall be unlawful to fail to comply with a Notice of Violation, Final Order, Stop Use Order or Condemnation Tag i 11issued pursuant to Title 13 . i; B. It shall be unlawful to remove or deface any sign, notice, complaint or order required by or posted by the Fire Chief ' in accordance with his/her enforcement duties under Title 13 . C. It shall be unlawful for any person to obstruct, impede or interfere with any lawful attempt to correct a violation or comply with any Notice of Violation, Final Order, Stop Use Order or Condemnation Tag. D. It shall be unlawful for any person to fail ta .... ; comply with an Emergency Order issued by the Fire Chief requiring !, that the building, dwelling unit and/or premises be restored to a condition of safety by a specified time. E. It shall be unlawful for any person to use or occupy, or to cause or permit any person to use or occupy the ibuilding, dwelling unit and/or premises after the date provided in Tian Emergency Order requiring the building, dwelling unit and/or premises to be vacated and closed, until the Fire Chief certifies that the conditions described in the Emergency Order have been corrected and the building, dwelling unit and/or premises have been restored to a safe condition. i j', 10 I I j� I I i 1 I 13. 14.220. Civil Penalty. I �i A. In addition to any other sanction or remedial procedure which may be available, any person violating or failing Ito comply with any of the provisions of Title 13 shall be subject 'Ito a cumulative penalty in the amount of three hundred dollars ($300. 00) per day for each violation from the date set for compliance until the corrections are made as described in the Order. B. The penalty imposed by this section shall be _ collected by civil action brought in the name of the City. The Fire Chief shall notify the City Attorney in writing of the name of any person subject to the penalty, and the City Attorney shall, with the assistance of the Fire Chief, take appropriate action to collect the penalty. C. The violator may show as full or partial mitigation of liability: 1. That the violation giving rise to the action was caused by the wilful act, or neglect, or abuse of another; or 2 . That correction of the violation was commenced promptly upon receipt of the Notice thereof, but that full compliance within the time specified was prevented by inability to !; obtain necessary materials or labor, inability to gain access to ,, the subject structure, or other condition or circumstance beyond ;' the control of the violator. 'i it �� 11 i I? I it f i i I I 13. 14.240. Criminal Penalties. A. Any person, firm or corporation violating the following provisions shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and, i upon conviction thereof, shall be punished in accordance with the 'iprovisions of K.C.C. Section 1. 02 . 020 (Ordinance 3013) relating to I' criminal penalties for misdemeanors. i !i 1. Violations of Section 13 . 14 . 200 (B) ; 2 . Violations of Section 13 . 14 . 200 (D) and (E) ; where the person has had a civil judgment under Section 13 . 14.220 or any of its predecessors rendered against him or her during the last five (5) years; 3 . For any pattern of wilful, intentional, or bad ..,. faith or refusal to comply with the standards or requirements of this chapter. 4 . For any other violation of the Fire Code for which corrective action is not possible. B. Each day that anyone shall continue to violate or fail to comply with any of the foregoing provisions shall be considered a separate offense. 13.14.260. Additional Relief. The Fire Chief may seek legal or equitable relief to enjoin any acts and practices and abate any condition which constitutes or will constitute a ( violation of the Codes when civil or criminal penalties are ; inadequate to effect compliance. Nothing in this ordinance shall 12 Y.- i i i I I ii I i i i I I r.. be deemed to limit or preclude any action or proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Code for the Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, K.C.C. i Chapter 14 . 10. 1, Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The ;' invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section ;tor portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application !! thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its , application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final passage as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ;! ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY i I I 13 ji ;I i� I ;i G Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: LID 338/LID 339/DECANT STATIONS/94TH AVE. STORM 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was June 23 with three bids received, all of which exceeded the engineer's estimate. The projects were originally combined in the hope of attracting better bids. However, after review of the bids received and a survey of the current construction climate, staff recommends the bids be rejected and the project re-bid as separate projects. 3 . EXHIBITS: emo from Public Works Director, bid summary 4. RECOMMENDED y: 3-0 Vote of Public Works Committee (Committee Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FI CAL PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL PERSO L NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE RE IRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS. 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACT N: Councilmember _moves, Councilmember C. seconds the bids for LID 338/LID 339/Decant Stations/94th Ave. Storm be rejected and the project re-bid. DISCUSSION• (� ACTION• o Council Agenda Item No. 5A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 25, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Nvi FROM: DON WICKSTROM,.0 RE: BID OPENING - L. I.D. 338/ L. I.D. 339/ DECANT STATIONS/ 94TH AVENUE STORM Bid opening was Tuesday, June 23 . Three bids were received all of which were significantly over the engineer's estimate. We originally combined the projects hoping to attract better bid prices. After the bid opening, we surveyed the larger contractors who bought plans but did not bid the project. Apparently there are a number of large projects available at this time creating an uncompetitive bidding situation. We are recommending that we reject the bids received, divide the project into separate jobs and re-bid. By so doing, we would expect to attract smaller contractors and hopefully solicit better bids. BID SUMMARY R.W. Scott $ 610, 010. 06 Woodinville Constructors 615, 164 . 60 Robison Construction 1, 117, 247 . 03 Engineer's Estimate $490,828 . 21 Kent City Council Meeting Date July 7 , 1992 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: CENTRAL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid ope ing was June 26 with six bids received. The low bid was sub# tted by West Coast Construction in the amount of $853,894 .89 . recommended this bid be accepted and the project awarded to West Coast Construction, subject to approval of TIB. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director and bid summary 4. RECOMMENDED BY: 3-0 vote of Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember- Id�--ff�� moves, Councilmember seconds the bid of $853, 894 .89 from West Coast Construction be accepted and the contract awarded for the Central Avenue Improvement project, subject to TIB approval . DISCUSSION• ACTION:- Council Agenda Item No. 5B Ix DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 29, 1992 TO: PUBLIC WORKS [[COMMITTEE FROM: DON WICKSTROM�\� RE: CENTRAL AVENUE ��IMPROVEMENTS The bid opening was Friday, June 26 at which six bids were received. The low bid was submitted by West Coast Construction in the amount of $853 , 894 . 89 . The project will widen Central Avenue from Titus to Gowe, provide left and right turn lanes from northbound Central onto Gowe, install a new signal at Gowe and Central, and overlay Central from E. Smith Street to E. Willis Street along with related water main, storm and sidewalk improvements. It is recommended the bid submitted by West Coast Construction be accepted and the contract awarded. BID SUMMARY West Coast Construction $ 853 , 894 . 89 R.W. Scott Construction 879, 366 . 46 Klokstad Construction 889, 120. 08 Robison Construction 913 , 883 . 78 Tri-State Construction 948 , 088 . 31 Gary Merlino Construction 1, 021, 160. 61 Engineer's Estimate $ 839, 621. 03 . ........ ... CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS A. R E P O R T S A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT i B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE r C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE D. PLANNING COMMITTEE E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE r i i F. PARKS COMMITTEE / ' G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS - Update on Budget Proposals BRENDA JACOBER ���� (please put in CITY OF Council agenda packet) CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 16, 1992 4: 00 PM dA®II�� COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT OTHER CITY STAFF Leona Orr, Chair Tom Brubaker Jim Bennett Alana McIalwain Judy Woods PLANNING STAFF GUESTS Lin Ball Barbara Simpson, Acting Director Sharon Clamp Chamber of Commerce Jim Harris Kevin O'Neill Fred Satterstrom Margaret Porter GROWTH MANAGEMENT UPDATE - (F SATTERSTROM) Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom stated the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) recently held hearings in local communities and several changes have been made to the recommended GMPC goals and policies. These changes will be the subject of a upcoming hearing of the King County Council on Monday, June 22, 1992 . Planner Kevin O'Neill has reviewed the differences between the original GMPC recommendations and those which will be heard on June 22 . Kevin O'Neill distributed a summary and reviewed the major amendments. Planning Director James Harris is concerned about the tight timelines involved with the new policies. Barbara Simpson, Acting Director of the Kent Chamber of Commerce, stated the Chamber is very concerned that economic impact is not part of the plan, and they are concerned about the issue of affordable housing. The Chamber feels these issues need to be part of the package and to increase land values in urban centers would be detrimental to keeping jobs in the area. HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE UPDATE (L. BALL) Lin Ball reported that the Human Services Roundtable is continuing to look at existing services and programs that address child abuse and neglect. The Roundtable's May meeting featured Kip Tokuda, Executive Director of the Governor's Council on Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Mr. Tokuda reported that prevention works, however, it is one of the hardest items to fund because it is �� difficult to measure the results. The Roundtable is continuing to CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 16, 1992 - PAGE 2 study information in order to decide what route they want to take in their 1993 program on child and youth issues. Phase I of the Roundtable's housing access information and referral project which addresses individuals at risk of becoming homeless is complete. The Roundtable contracted with Gambrell & Associates to determine what housing support and information and referral services are available in King County. Phase II of the project will look at successful models throughout the country, specifically coordinating services and providing more effective use of funds. The Domestic Abused Women's Network (DAWN) confidential shelter will open in July. A contractor is currently renovating the site, and a shelter coordinator has been hired. Transitional shelter housing is scheduled to open January 1993 . A domestic violence data base is being maintained by the County. Statistics relating to Kent will be presented at a future meeting. TEAM DOWNTOWN UPDATE (F. SATTERSTROM) Fred Satterstrom explained that Team Downtown started in September 1991 with a series of retreats convened by Dee Moschel and the Kent -- Downtown Association in cooperation with the Chamber of Commerce. It brought together people concerned about the downtown area. Problems and opportunities in downtown were identified and participants expressed their preferences. As a result of the retreats, a great deal of energy was spent getting people together to talk about downtown, the future of Kent Downtown Association, and determining what people foresee in terms of management of the downtown area. This effort 'relates to the City Council ' s downtown revitalization goals but is independent of the city's downtown planning and rezoning plan. Currently Team Downtown' s efforts are more directed at downtown management and coordination rather than development programs and zoning and land use planning concerns. The results of the September 1991 retreat led to interviews of approximately 70 individuals. The City of Kent, through an EDC grant, provided funding for a consultant to compile a report which was presented at a large community meeting at the Kent Library on March 31, 1992 . As a result, three task forces were formed: planning, organization committee, and retail committee. A fund- raising program has begun, and their goal is to raise $25, 000 by June 30, 1992 . Team Downtown has adopted bylaws, a job description for a downtown manager/coordinator, a preliminary budget, and are forming a board of directors. They will unveil their strategy at a breakfast meeting to be held at 7 : 30 a.m. on June 30. CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 16, 1992 PAGE 3 URBAN GROWTH AREA (K. O'NEILL) Kevin O'Neill stated that the Growth Management Act requires each county to impose an urban growth area. The Growth Management Planning Council has proposed a countywide urban growth area, however, the ultimate decision on this area will be made by the King County Council in conjunction with the cities of King County. The City of Kent needs to look at its own interim growth area because it is necessary for the City to determine the boundaries within which the new comprehensive plan will be prepared. The alternatives are based on existing policies of one kind or another and are all within the urban area proposed by the Growth Management Planning Council. Alternative 1 is a very tight boundary encompassing the present city limits plus a small area to the northeast. The area outside of the city limits represents an area which the City currently has both water and sewer franchises. Alternative lA is slightly larger than Alternative 1 and includes land in which the City has either water or sewer franchises, but "• not necessarily both. Alternative 2 is based on the city' s priority annexation area map which the Kent City Council adopted in 1989 . This area is consistent with the City' s current planning area boundary. Alternative 3 is very similar to the city' s existing planning area boundary. The only difference is that it includes the Panther Lake area which is not presently part of the city' s planning area. This area has been included in this alternative since it is presently served by the Kent Fire Department and is also part of the Kent School District. Alternative 4 includes all of the area in Alternative 3 and extends the eastern boundary east of Big Soos Creek to Covington. The proposed boundary east of the existing planning area follows the urban/rural line proposed by the Growth Management Planning Council. The Planning Commission considered the alternatives at their June 8, 1992 hearing and recommended Alternative 4 . Their rational in making this recommendation is that Kent needs to plan for the possibility of the Covington area being designated urban. They feel the area impacts Kent and many of the residents associate themselves with Kent. CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES JUNE 16, 1992 -- PAGE 4 Staff recommends Alternative 3 because it is consistent with existing City policies and the Soos Creek Plan. Fred Satterstrom stated that Alternative 4 was offered as an extreme example for discussion purposes only. At the Planning Commission meeting staff did not have a great deal of information about who provides services to Covington. James Harris questions if Kent can service the Covington area and wonders if Kent can provide services that, in time, Covington can provide for itself with its own tax base. Kevin O'Neill feels the Planning Commission may have been making a distinction between a planning area and an urban growth area. He believes the Planning Commission may be saying that we should plan for the Covington area but may not necessarily want to annex it. However, the intent of the Growth Management Act and the Countywide Planning Policies seems to be that the planning area and urban growth area be consistent. James Harris pointed out that Kent has gone on record with the County as agreeing with the growth boundary in the Soos Creek Plan. Council President Woods stated Councilmember Johnson has indicated strong support for Alternative 3 . Chair Orr prefers Alternative 3 but would like information on what it would take for Kent to service the Covington area and if servicing Covington is even realistic. Councilmember Bennett favors Alternative 3 and would also like information on servicing the Covington area. ADDED ITEMS Chair Orr stated the work release issue needs to be scheduled for a future meeting. The citizens concerned about this issue will contact Chair Orr to advise her of a convenient time for them to meet with the Committee. This is a separate issue from the Regional Justice Center. At a recent Public Safety Committee meeting, it was decided to bring this issue to Planning Committee to resolve distance and siting issues. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5: 10 p.m. PC0616.92 PUBLIC WORKS COMA TTEE June 17, 1992 PRESENT: Paul Mann Kevin Lindell Jim Bennett Ed Chow Don Wickstrom May Miller Tom Brubaker Mr. and Mrs. Rust Gary Gill Darlene Jevne Parking Restrictions on 3rd between Titus and Saar Wickstrom stated we had received a request from Darlene Jevne to create loading zones on Third Avenue in front of the school. Ms. Jevne distributed a listing of reasons for her request to the Committee (copy attached) . She commented that the vehicles parking on Third beside the church are parking with their front bumpers over the sidewalk obstructing the doors on this side of the school. This situation severely obstructs exiting from the building and poses a safety problem especially for emergency evacuation. Additionally, the parents and school buses must stop across the street to unload and load students who must walk across the street and in between parked cars. She requested a Loading Zone be created in front of the doors opening onto Third. This would allow the students to arrive or leave the facility in a safe manner. Paul Mann read a letter he had received regarding a situation at 3rd and Saar when a child riding a bicycle was nearly struck by a car. The letter relates that "cars were blocking sidewalks, parked directly across crosswalks and parked in such a fashion as to partially block the paved area of both streets of this intersection. " Ms. Jevne commented that is a blind corner with the cars parked along there. Paul Mann asked that Ms. Jevne's request and the situation in the letter be addressed. Wickstrom stated we could address it but will probably mean the loss of parking stalls. Jim Bennett asked about the City's liability once we have been "put on notice" of a potentially hazardous situation. Tom Brubaker stated that the possibility of liability exists but would depend also upon the specific incident and situation. Jim Bennett moved that the Public Works staff develop an interim solution for the problem. Gary Gill commented there are possibly ways to sign the area to allow the loading and unloading. The Traffic section can look into it. Jim Bennett commented he was more concerned about the safety of the students than the parking spaces especially when there is a parking lot a few blocks away that is under-utilized. Public Works Committee June 17 , 1992 Page 2 The Committee unanimously approved that the Public Works staff develop an interim solution to the problem. CPG Grant Wickstrom explained we had applied for this grant last year. When originally presented, it was noted this grant would fund 60% of the Solid Waste Coordinator's position. It was recognized that if the grant were approved, the City would have to come up with the 40% match. We have received approval of our grant application. Because of the City's financial situation, we rewrote the job description to that of a Conservation Specialist, decreased the responsibilities but added a water conservation element, and placed it under the supervision of the Public Works Administrative Assistant III. The City is required to meet certain water reductions through conservation by 1995 . This approach then gives us the ability to address the conservation issue as well and the 40% match can be funded from the water utility. This completely funds the position without any impact to the general fund. A further benefit is that if we advertise the position in-house only, the possibility of another general fund position filling this position further relieves the general fund. Wickstrom added that if we do not move forward on this shortly the grant offer will be repealed. Wickstrom stated he was requesting concurrence of the change in the position as explained, authorization to sign the grant agreement and transferring approximately $32 , 000 from the water utility to finance the 40% match for the position. Jim Bennett commented that since this is a program that is required and we have a grant that pays for a percentage of the position, it makes sense to approve it. Wickstrom stated this addressed two problems with no impact on the general fund. We have to address recycling as mandated through adoption of the comprehensive plan and we have to reduce water consumption by 5% by 1995. The Committee unanimously recommended that the request be approved. Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan Wickstrom explained that the action required is to authorize us to establish July 21 as the hearing date for the Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. He stated we will bring a draft of the Plan to the Committee for their review at the next Committee meeting. The Committee unanimously approved setting July 21 as hearing date for the Six Year TIP. Public Works Committee June 17, 1992 Page 3 Soosette Creek Lift Station Wickstrom explained that the Lindental development required construction of a lift station. The construction is complete and the developer is requesting the City accept same for operation and maintenance. The Committee unanimously recommended acceptance. James Street and Russell Road Jim Bennett asked about the timing of the plat that would affect the traffic patterns at this intersection. Gill responded that the plat meeting is this month at which the conditions affecting the plat road improvements and closures will be discussed. He added that he thought the developer had intentions of trying to start construction this summer. Jim Bennett requested that we temporarily address the problem he brought up at the last Committee meeting about trucks turning around at the end of James and causing the ground to give way. Gill stated we could take a look at what types of interim measures might resolve the concerns. ST. CHRISTOPHER ACADEMY Darlene Jevne, Director REQUEST FOR LOADING ZONE IN FRONT OF THIRD AVE S St . Christopher Academy is nationally recognized as one of the best schools for the learning disabled student . We have been in the same location for the past 11 years . We service approximately 100 learning disabled children in grades Kindergarten through Eighth . Many have multiple handicaps and are considered part of the " special needs" population . We have been an integral part of the Kent community and have participated in many civic and cultural activities . We have supported the Kent Parks and Recreational Department through our weekly school bulletins . We have participated in Cornucopia Days, Cantebury Faire and allow the King County Fire Department to use our facility to test Medics for the Medic One program. We also believe that we generate quite a bit of revenue from our staff and parents who spend many dollars in the Kent area while working here or waiting to pick up their students . We feel that as a school that targets the special population some extra consideration should be given to us . Please review the statements listed below and grant our request for a " Loading Zone Only" in front of our Third Ave South entrance . Reasons For Requesting Loading Zone * General Safety * Fire Safety : The entire West wing of the school would exit through these doors in case of a fire or an emergency . This constitutes approximately 60 students, many of which have definite handicaps. With cars parked right up next to the door this could make the exiting process much more difficult . * Students at St . Christopher Academy have many different types of handicaps . Many of our students have what is known as ADD, (Attention Deficit Disorder) or ADHD, (Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder ) . This causes them to be impulsive , lack control , and have difficulty following directions. Others have seizure disorders , or are hearing impaired. Some are MMR, (Mildly Mentally Retarded) . Speech/Language office at that end of the building has language and hearing impaired students using this entrance . 318 Third Avenue South • Kent, WA 98032 • (206) 852-1515