HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 06/16/1992 `
` City of Kent
.'
SUMMARY AGENDA
KENT CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 16, 1992
Council Chambers
7 : 00 p.m.
MAYOR: Dan Kelleher COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President
Jim Bennett Christi Houser Jon Johnson
l� Paul Mann Leona Orr Jim White
Q�v�
CALL TO ORDER
c' y ROLL CALL
Y1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
XKA. Kent .Community Forum Recognition
X8 cZ-- I
PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
y 13 . ONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
B. Bills
White River Historical Society Museum Services Agreement
D• Council Absence
West Hill Island Annexation - set date for public
hearing - Resolution %.g / (,
. Chestnut Ridge Annexation - set date for public meeting
TL-Street Closure - Balloon Classic - Ordinance 3 CY Street Closure - Canterbury Faire - Ordinance =3 (- 11 7
V Street Closure - Cornucopia Days - Ordinance 3c' �/S'
✓J. Bill of Sale - Dead Tree Short Plat/Family Homes Short
Plat #1
J Interagency Agreement - 196th/200th Corridor
// . Interlocal Agreement - Commute Trip Reduction
JM. TIB Grant - Central Avenue Improvement
`7N. Used Motor Oil Collection Events
JO. 1992 Jail Health Services Contract
�4 . THER BUSINESS
VA. Fireworks Ordinance y C y�; j ve�zi-caJ
VA.
5. BIDS J
A. 1992 Asphalt Overlays
/ 43. North Park Sanitary Sewer Rebuild
`J6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
'J7. REPORTS
J8 . ADJOURNMENT
NOTE: A copy of the full agenda packet is available in the City
Clerk' s Office and the Kent Library.
An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of
this page.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Kent Community Forum Recognition
Aq L;-
'5X
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
1
Councilmember C L moves, Councilmember
seconds that Cons Cal dar Items A through O be approved.
Discussion
Action
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
� June 2 , 1992 .
&I
3B J Approval of Bills.
a/ Approval of payment of the bills received through June 15,
after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at
2 : 00 p.m. on June 16, 1992 .
r..
_r IN Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
�/} Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Council Agenda J
Item No. 3 A B
Kent, Washington
June 2, 1992
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7: 00 p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers Bennett,
Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr, White and Woods, City Administrator
Chow, City Attorney Lubovich, Public Works Director Wickstrom,
Planning Director Harris, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief
Crawford, Human Resources Director Olson, Information Services
Director Spang, and Finance Director McCarthy. Parks Director
Wilson was not in attendance. Approximately 40 people were at
the meeting.
PUBLIC Employee of the Month. Mayor Kelleher announced
COMMUNICATION that Wayne Himple, Training Coordinator for the
Police Department, has been selected as the
Employee of the Month for June. He noted that
Wayne is one of the most conscientious, con-
tributing and productive members of this organ-
ization. He further noted that Wayne ' s partici-
pation in leadership roles in the Statewide
Special Olympics, Police Training Officer's
Organizations, Torch Run Committees, the City's
Wellness Committee and Safety Committee demon-
strate his personal interest in helping his fellow
employees and the community.
Chief Crawford noted that Wayne almost single-
handedly raised over $6, 000 for the Special
Olympics. He noted that he has been with the
Police Department for 10 years and is an excellent
officer. The Mayor presented Himple with the
Employee of the Month plaque.
CONSENT WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through
CALENDAR G, with the exception of Item C which was removed
at the request of Councilmember Bennett, be
approved. Johnson seconded and the motion car-
ried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of
the regular Council meeting of May 19 , 1992 .
1
June 2, 1992
WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
Water Service Agreement. AUTHORIZATION for the
Mayor to sign an agreement with Covington Water
District allowing the construction of a water
transmission main across City property, as recom-
mended by the Public Works Committee.
SEWER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Robinson Sewer Extension. ACCEPTANCE of the bill
of sale and warranty agreement submitted by Grace
Robinson for continuous operation and maintenance
of approximately 371 feet of sanitary sewer exten-
sion constructed in the vicinity of 94th Avenue
So. and So. 232nd Street and release of cash bond
after expiration of the one-year maintenance
period, as recommended by the Public Works Commit-
tee.
STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
Van Doren's Landincr - Segregation of Assessments.
ADOPTION of Resolution No. 1314 segregating
Assessment Numbers 45 and 46 in LID 327 and Reso-
lution No. 1315 segregating Assessment Numbers 6,
7 and 8 in LID 330 for the plat of Van Doren' s
Landing, as recommended by the Public Works Com-
mittee.
PUBLIC (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
WORKS Underground Storage Tank Removal and Installation
of Above Ground Tank. ACCEPT as complete the con-
tract with CECON Construction for the underground
storage tank removal project and release of
retainage after receipt of releases from the
State, as recommended by the Public Works Commit-
tee.
FINAL (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
PLATS Hemlock Acres No. 19 Final Plat No. SU-88-4. This
meeting will consider an application for the
Hemlock Acres No. 19 Final Plat No. SU-88-4 . The
property is approximately 3 . 66 acres in size and
is located along the east side of 112th Ave. S .E. ,
2
June 2 , 1992
FINAL approximately 650 feet north of S.E. 240th Street.
PLATS All conditions of the preliminary plat have been
met. There were no comments from the audience and
ORR MOVED to approve the staff's recommended
approval of Hemlock Acres No. 19 Final Plat No.
SU-88-4 .
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D)
Garrison Heights Final Plat No. SU-89-7. This
meeting will consider an application for the
Garrison Heights Final Plat No. SU-89-7 . The
property is approximately 8 . 6 acres in size and is
located at the southeast corner of the intersec-
tion at So. 213th Place and 94th Place So. All
conditions of the preliminary plat have been met.
There were no comments from the audience and ORR
MOVED to approve the staff' s recommended approval
for Garrison Heights Final Plat No. SU-89-7 .
Woods seconded and the motion carried.
SHORELINE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4E)
MASTER Shoreline Master Program Amendments No. SMP-90-1
PROGRAM and No. SMP-91-1 (Foster Industrial Park Lot 18) .
AMENDMENTS This meeting will consider the recommended adop-
tion of the Shoreline Master Program Amendments
(SMP-90-1 and SMP-91-1) as recommended by the
Planning Committee and as now approved by the
Department of Ecology. These items were approved
by the City Council at their June 4 and September
31 1991 Council meeting by Resolution No. 1295 and
Resolution No. 1283 , but needed to also be
approved by the Department of Ecology.
Ann Watanabe of the Planning Department explained
that this is the finalization of some amendments
which the Council has previously approved. She
noted that the Department of Ecology suggested
minor revisions and that staff agreed to them.
ORR MOVED to adopt the Shoreline Master Program
Amendments No. SMP-90-1 and No. SMP-91-1 which
have been approved by the Department of Ecology,
as recommended by the Planning Committee, and to
direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
ordinance. Bennett seconded and the motion car-
ried.
3
June 2 , 1992
DOWNTOWN (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4F)
ZONING Downtown Plan Zoning Program. This meeting will
PROGRAM consider the Planning Commission's recommended
approval of the Downtown Plan Zoning Program. The
proposal recommends establishing three zoning
districts, outlines new development standards for
the downtown area, recommends a design review
process for new downtown development, modifies
parking requirements, design of sidewalks, and
lighting of pedestrian corridors. The Planning
Commission approved the proposal on February 24 ,
1992 . Two City Council Workshops were held on
March 30 and May 19, 1992 .
Fred Satterstrom, Planning Manager, noted that
while preserving the core of the downtown, the
Zoning Plan strives to concentrate a mix of
diverse and high intensity uses in the downtown
planning area. He added that it depends upon a
design review process to ensure that environmen-
tal and public goals that have been adopted by the
City will be preserved. He said the plan calls
for long term management of parking, and that the
plan is consistent with the emerging policy of the
Growth Management Act. He encouraged the Council
to adopt the recommendation of the Planning Com-
mission.
ORR MOVED to approve the proposed Downtown Plan
Zoning Program (ZCA-90-6) establishing three new
zoning districts, outlining new development stan-
dards for the downtown area, recommending a design
review process for new downtown development and
modifying parking requirements, sidewalk design
and lighting of pedestrian corridors, as recom-
mended by the Planning Commission, with the fol-
lowing modifications:
1. Delete the following uses from the proposed
Principally Permitted Uses in the DC zone:
launderettes, motels, public facilities,
business and technical schools, preschools and
daycare centers;
4
June 2 , 1992
DOWNTOWN 2 . Delete the use of churches under Special Per-
ZONING mit Uses and add the following use: pre-
PROGRAM schools and daycare centers limited to a
maximum of 12 children with -no on-site
parking;
3 . Amend the height regulations of the DC zone to
permit a maximum building height of four
stories;
4 . Amend the proposed zoning map recommended by
the Planning Commission to indicate DCE (Down-
town Commercial Enterprise) zoning in lieu of
MRH (High Density Multifamily) for that area
lying along Titus Street, generally between
State Street and the Senior Center;
and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the
necessary ordinance. Woods seconded.
Orr noted for White that public facilities include
regional and community facilities such as
libraries, government office buildings, and parks.
She said that she is not advocating removing
parks, but that she does not feel things such as
libraries and government office buildings belong
in the downtown core area, since they are not
pedestrian-oriented uses. She clarified for Mann
that her modifications did not go through any com-
mittees, but were discussed at two workshops. She
explained that she is suggesting modifications to
the Planning Commission' s recommendation. Upon
Mann's question, she explained that preschools and
daycare centers create traffic problems, and that
large daycare facilities would not be beneficial
in the core area. Satterstrom stated that staff
has been aware of these modifications. He showed
the DC zone on a map, noting that it is not very
large, approximately 13 acres. The Mayor handed
the gavel to Council President Woods and noted
that the fact that the DC zone is so limited takes
the sting out of these restrictions. He said that
his preference would be to make the zoning
throughout as unrestrictive as possible. He sug-
gested that, as an alternative, it might be possi-
ble to allow uses such as launderetts, motels,
preschools and so forth, as conditional uses
5
June 2 , 1992
DOWNTOWN rather than outright permitted uses so that there
ZONING would be some review process. He explained that
PROGRAM downtown will thrive better if economics are good,
and economics will be better if more types of uses
can be allowed in the downtown area.
White pointed out that it is proposed that drive-
through windows for banks be excluded in the DC
zone, and asked whether they would also be
excluded in the DCE zone. Orr explained that
drive-through restaurants and businesses would be
a conditional use in the DCE zone, and that it is
a non-permitted use in DC. White noted that he
would prefer that drive-throughs be allowed in
both zones, but offered a friendly amendment to
allow drive-through businesses under Principally
Permitted Uses in DCE. He clarified for Orr that
this would not include drive-through restaurants.
Orr accepted his friendly amendment, as did Woods.
Orr clarified for the Mayor that churches would
not be permitted in the DC zone because they would
take up too much room in this small area. Orr's
motion, as amended, then carried.
FIRE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
DEPARTMENT REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER BENNETT
Modification of Warranty Agreement - East Hill
Complex. AUTHORIZATION for the Fire Department to
enter into a modified agreement on the warranty
phase of the East Hill project.
Due to outstanding items needing corrective
action, the Fire Department has not accepted the
East Hill Complex as 100 percent complete.
Because of the contractor's delay in completing
the punch list, the time frame of this project has
far extended the schedule period. The Fire De-
partment is recommending that a review of the
building be made. Any problems appearing to be
warranty items will be brought to the contractor' s
attention. When these items are resolved, this
will satisfy the contractual one-year warranty
period. If they are unable to complete the war-
ranty items in a timely fashion, the City would
proceed according to the terms of the contract.
6
June 2 , 1992
FIRE Bennett voiced concern that this project has not
DEPARTMENT been finalized, and pointed out that a reputation
regarding the cost of doing business in Kent may
be developed, whether warranted or not.
Fire Chief Angelo noted that a tremendous amount
of progress has been made since this last came to
Council, but that there are still three major
items to be taken care of. He added that the
punch list is very close to being completed, at
which point the warranty would begin. He noted
that they had proposed to provide a list of war-
ranty-type items which, once completed, would be
free of the typical one year warranty. He noted
that continuing problems which would normally come
under warranty would be a significant cost to the
community. He encouraged the Council to approve
the recommendation to end the one year warranty,
which would motivate the contractor to complete
the list and end his obligation. Bennett moved
that Administration work with the Fire Chief in
negotiating a final close-out on this project. He
noted that he would like to see a final date put
on the project. Angelo explained that if Council
desires to close the project at this time, it
would cost approximately $30, 000 to repair paint,
$6, 000 to repair a leak in the roof, and $10, 000
to repair a window. He noted that he has documen-
tation indicating that they have been not only
thorough, but timely, and have followed up with
the contractor in many areas. He indicated that
he could not set a date to complete the project.
He noted that the City could send the contractor a
series of 10-day notices and take them to court if
not complied with, but that they are very close to
compliance on the major items. He pointed out
that June lst was simply a target date for comple-
tion. He said that modification of the warranty
agreement would be an enticement for the contrac-
tor to complete the items, noting that he has re-
tainage tied up and it is in his best interest to
finish.
MANN MOVED to authorize the Fire Department to
enter into a modified agreement on the warranty
phase of the East Hill project. White seconded.
White stated that he does not want a situation in
7
June 2 , 1992
FIRE this complex like the defective floor in the
DEPARTMENT Senior Center. Mann's motion then carried. Chief
Angelo thanked Bennett for his comments and
assured him staff will work on his concerns.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4G)
ADDED BY CITY ATTORNEY LUBOVICH
Discharge of Fireworks. The Mayor noted that an
item regarding adoption of an ordinance which
would allow for the discharge of fireworks only on
July 4 , 1992 from the hours of 9 : 00 a.m. to 12 : 00
p.m. (midnight) has been added to tonight's
agenda. Fire Chief Angelo explained that King
County and several jurisdictions are contemplating
restricting the discharge of fireworks since the
risk of fire is higher this year than in any pre-
vious years due to the low moisture content in
vegetation. He added that by limiting the dis-
charge to certain times, staff could be upgraded
during that period.
City Attorney Lubovich stated that the City has
adopted the State Fireworks Law which provides for
the sale and distribution of fireworks between
June 28 and July 6, and that the same law allows
the City to be more restrictive. He said the pro-
posed ordinance would allow discharge on July 4th
only, from 9 : 00 a.m. to midnight, and that it does
not affect the sale or ownership of fireworks
between June 28 through July 6, so as not to
affect the inventory of suppliers. He added that
a misdemeanor penalty is included in the ordi-
nance, which is required by state law, and that
the ordinance would be in effect only until the
end of July when the State provisions would sup-
plant this ordinance. He noted that this is an
emergency ordinance which would become effective
immediately, and that an emergency ordinance would
require at least five votes of the Council.
Mann noted that the Public Safety Committee feels
it is very important that information is made
available to the public immediately if this ordi-
nance is passed. HE MOVED that Ordinance No. 3045
relating to the discharge of fireworks within the
City be adopted. Houser seconded. Upon White ' s
question, Angelo noted that the amount of loss
8
June 2, 1992
FIRE varies from year to year and includes vegetation,
DEPARTMENT yards, apartments catching on fire periodically,
burns, injuries and grass fires. White noted that
he has not seen anything to document loss due to
fireworks, and Angelo explained that because
people buy in one area and transport to another,
it is tracked at the County level. He noted for
the Mayor that every year there are grass fires,
tree fires, small fires on roofs, and many com-
plaints regarding the noise. He added that many
jurisdictions are considering the same action for
this year only, and that Fire Department personnel
will be passing out flyers at fireworks stands and
providing public information to the newspapers and
so forth.
The motion then carried with White opposed. The
Mayor stated that he will not sign the ordinance
and may veto it.
PARKS & (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
RECREATION Performing Arts Center Task Force Cultural Center
Development Strategy Timeline and Goals. Mayor
Kelleher noted that some Councilmembers had re-
quested that this item be referred back to the
Operations Committee. There was no objection from
the Council and it was so ordered.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Donation. The Kent Chamber of Commerce Foundation
will contribute $5, 000 to the Canterbury Faire in
1992 , and staff requests that Council accept the
donation. JOHNSON SO MOVED. Houser seconded and
the motion carried.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the
bills received through May 29 , 1992 after auditing
by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 4 : 00
p.m. on June 1, 1992 .
9
June 2 , 1992
FINANCE Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/16-5/29/92 118610-119068 $1, 173 , 905. 89
Approval of checks issued for payroll :
Date Check Numbers Amount
6/5/92 01172985-01173571 $ 463 ,730 . 26
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8 : 00 p.m.
Brenda Jacober, CMC
City Clerk
10
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16. 1992
! Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WHITE RIVER HISTORICAL SOCIETY MUSEUM SERVICES
AGREEMENT FOR 1992
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of the White River Historical
Society Services Agreement for 1992 with a level of funding of
$2 ,500 as recommended by the Planning Committee. The amount of
$2,500 was set aside in the 1992 budget.
3 . EXHIBITS: Museum Services Agreement, City Council Planning
Committee minutes of June 2 , 1992
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee - unanimous (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO_X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
pprov 1 of the hi e River tor
ical c ty Mus Servic
gre e t for 92 th a vet of fu in g $2 00 is as
a to ate in a 199 bu et, as mmended the Planning
C ittee
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C JC
U
1 MUSEUM SERVICES AGREEMENT
2
3 THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day
4 of , 1992 by and between the CITY OF AUBURN,
5 WASHINGTON, a municipal corporation .of the State of Washington
6 herein referred to as "CITY" , and the WHITE RIVER VALLEY
7 HISTORICAL SOCIETY, a Washington non-profit corporation,
8 herein referred to as "SOCIETY" . .
9 WHEREAS, the SOCIETY has done an excellent job in the
10 past to collect, preserve, exhibit, and interpret the history
11 and prehistory of the White River Valley and vicinity; and
12 WHEREAS, the SOCIETY now recognizes the need for
13 professional staff and other support to enable it to comply
14 with its Mission and Goals; and
15 WHEREAS, the CITY recognizes that the SOCIETY'S White
16 River Valley Historical Museum, herein referred to as
17 "Museum" , is a major asset to the citizens of Auburn and the j
18 Valley-at-large; and
19 WHEREAS, the Museum building located in Les Gove Park,
20 918 "H" Street SW, Auburn, Washington, and all artifacts,
21
archives, other historic materials, fixtures, exhibition
22
materials, furniture, equipment .and other personal property
23
therein are the sole property of the SOCIETY; except the
24
25
26
--------------------------------
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
1
2 supplies, furniture and equipment purchased by the CITY wrc--Lch
3 shall remain the sole property of the CITY; and
; '. 4 WHEREAS, the land upon which the Museum building is
. -- — 5
situated is the sole property of the CITY; and
6 WHEREAS, the CITY and the SOCIETY desire to work together
7 to continue and expand the viability and services of the
8 Museum.
9 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY AND THE SOCIETY IN CONSIDERATION
10 OF THE CONDITIONS AND COVENANTS HEREIN DO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
11 Article 1. Governance.
12
1. 1 Governing Body of the Museum.
13 The Governing Body of the Museum is the Board of
14 Directors of the SOCIETY. All members of the Boarc if
15 Directors shall be members of the SOCIETY and shall, as
16 their highest priority, uphold the public trust placed in
17 them and, as provided in the mission and goals statement
18 of the SOCIETY, take upon themselves all the duties and
19 responsibilities which are required under the bylaws,
20 policies, and agreements approved by the SOCIETY.
21 1. 2 Number of Board of Directors.
22 The number of Directors serving on the Board shall be no
23 more than seventeen (17) .
24
25
26
-------------------------------
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Page 2
i
1
2
1. 3 Selection of Members.
A. Nine (9) members shall be elected by the General
3
4 Membership of the SOCIETY in accordance with the
5 SOCIETY by-laws.
6 B. Seven (7) members shall be appointed by the Mayor of
the CITY with the approval of the CITY Council.
7
8 C. One (1) member may be appointed by the City of Kent
9 provided that the level of annual funding by the
10 City of Kent does not fall below $2500 for the
maintenance and operations of the Museum. Should
11 i 12 the City of Kent fund below this level, the CITY
will appoint the member to the Board. !
13
14 D. Should the CITY of Kent or another governmental I
15 agency wish to initiate or alter a contribution of
16 funding and/or services for the basic operation of
17 the Museum, then this Agreement may be modified to
18 allow for appropriate representation on the Board of
19 Directors subject to the mutual consent of the
!
SOCIETY and the CITY.
20
21 1. 4 Meetings.
22 A. All Board and General Membership meetings of the
23 SOCIETY shall comply with the State of Washington
24 Open Meeting Act.
25
26
----------------------
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
1
2 B. The minutes and agenda shall be a matter of Public
Record and shall be filed with ,the CITY Clerk.
3
4 C. The Museum Director and/or a representative from the
5 CITY should be present at all meetings of the
6 SOCIETY.
7 Article 2 . Responsibilities of the SOCIETY.
8 The SOCIETY with the assistance of the Museum Director
9 will be responsible for the following:
10 A. Adopt or modify policies regulating activities
11 specific to Museum operations, the management and
12 use of collections, the use of facilities, and other
13 �
functions as it deems necessary or appropriate.
14 B. Develop long-term plans for the Museum which sha
15I include revenue sources, capital programs,
16 collections, use of facilities, fees for Museum
17 services, and marketing.
i8 C. Develop and implement a Docent program, collections
I
19 caretakers, and other Museum volunteer activities.
I
20 D. Prepare and submit to the CITY an annual report I
21 reviewing the operations for the previous year and
22 defining the goals and objectives for the Museum in
23 the coming year.
24
25
26
-------------------------------
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Page 4 i
1
2 E. This Article does not prohibit the SOCIETY from
3 carrying on other activities authorized by the
SOCIETY'S charter, by-laws, or mission statement.
4
5 Article 3 . Responsibilities of the CITY.
The CITY shall be responsible for the following:
6
A. Provide A Museum Director to further the mission and
7
8 goals of the SOCIETY as set forth in the Bylaws of
the SOCIETY provided that Auburn citizens clearly
9
benefit from this service.
10
11 B. Provide the following in-kind services to the Museum
providing that Auburn citizens clearly benefit from
12
I
13 this service:
1 . Printing and mailing of newsletter and other
14
brochures for programs, exhibits, or projects
15
which further the Mission and goals of the
16
SOCIETY as related to the Museum.
17
18 2 . Maintenance and supplies for the exterior j
19 grounds of the Museum building. When expertise
20 and time is available from CITY personnel,
21 services will be provided to assist with
22 exhibit installation, building repairs, and
23 other related tasks.
24 3 . Clerical support to assist the Museum Director
25 with his/her responsibilities in serving the
i
26
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
i
1
2 general mission of the SOCIETY as directly
related to the Museum.
3
4 Article 4 . StattinQ.
i
5 4 . 1 Museum Director.
6 The Museum Director shall be employed by and compensated
7 by the CITY and shall receive all normal CITY benefits.
8 He/she shall be subject to all policies and procedures of
9 CITY employees as well as Museum policies adopted by the
10 SOCIETY. The Museum Director's performance in regard to
11 the administration of the Museum shall be reviewed
12 annually in compliance with regular CITY personnel
13 procedures. Prior to the review, the Museum Director's
14 supervisor will meet with the President and Vi( I
15
President of the Board of Directors for a confidential
'
16 evaluation of his/her performance. i
17 4 . 2 Other Museum Staff.
18 A. All additional staff at the Museum, whether the
19
position is funded by a municipality or privately
20 through grants or other sources, will report
21 directly to the Museum Director and be subject to
22 Museum policies adopted by the SOCIETY.
I
23 B. All volunteers at the Museum will report directly to
24 the Museum Director or staff assigned by the
25 Director.
26
------------------------------
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Page 6
1
Article 5. Building, Land and Collection ownership.
2
This Agreement does not change the SOCIETY ownership of
3
I
the Museum building nor of the artifacts, archives, other
4
historic materials, fixtures, exhibition materials,
5
5 furniture, equipment and other personal property within
i
the Museum building; provided that, the CITY retains
7
8 ownership of the supplies, equipment and furniture
purchased by the CITY.
911
10 Article 6 . Finances.
I
11 6 . 1 SOCIETY Budget.
A. The SOCIETY will develop an annual operating and
12i
131 capital improvements budget for the Museum.
B. The SOCIETY may develop grants and promote donations
14
15 to the Museum for the operating budget, designated
16 capital improvements, and the Museum's permanent
171 collection.
18 C. The SOCIETY shall keep accurate financial books and i
19
records in compliance with all accepted accounting
201 standards. The SOCIETY shall prudently manage all
21
gifts made to the SOCIETY and expend contributions
22 exclusively for the benefit intended.
i
23 D. All financial records of the SOCIETY shall be
24 subject to examination by the CITY at any time upon
25 request.
26
------------------------------
Musseum Agreement
April 20, 1992
i
I
1
E. The CITY through the Museum Director will annually
2
coordinate with the SOCIETY Board to develop an
3
operating budget for the Museum to determine the
4
needs for the upcoming year. The CITY may consider
5
6 funding special projects, programs, capital
equipment, capital projects, or exhibits to take
8 place at the Museum which clearly demonstrate a
benefit to the CITY. The CITY will consider
9
allocations to the Museum as outlined in Article 3
10
11 as part of the normal annual CITY budget process .
12j F. The Museum Director will document on a monthly basis
13I all in-kind services provided to the Museum by the
CITY. This information shall be made available
14
the SOCIETY Board.
15
161 Article 7 . Duration of Agreement.
17 7 . 1 Duration. !
g
18 � This Agreement shall be in effect for five (5) years
19I beginning the day of 1992 and
20
ending the day of , 1997•
21 7.2 Renewal.
22 This Agreement may be renewed for an additional five (5)
23 years upon mutual agreement by the CITY and the SOCIETY
24 six (6) months prior to the expiration of this Agreement.
25
26
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Page 8
I
1
i
2 7. 3 Ame-- n�nt.
3 This Agreement sets forth the full understanding of the
4 SOCIETY and the CITY and may
5 except b Y not be modified nor amended
y written amendment duly executed by the SOCIETY '
6 and the CITY. I
7 7. 4 -Termination
i
8 A. This may Agreement be terminated b
9 Y
y either party for '
9 any cause upon ninety (90) days written notice to I
10 the other party. j
11 B• Upon of receipt j P a termination notice under the above
12 paragraph, the CITY shall cease any and all support
13 and all other in-kind services
for the SOCIETY at
14 the end of ninety (90) d �
ays. Any capital equipment i
15 which is purchased for use in the Museum by the CITY
16 remains the property of the CITY.
17 C. Upon termination of
this Agreement, the Directors
18 who have been appointed to the SOCIETY Board by the
19 CITY shall no �
longer be members of the Board unless
20 elected to the Board by the membership of the I
21 SOCIETY.
22
23
24 I
25
1
2 ticle a. SOCIETY
evlaws.
3 8. 1 Amendment
of B laws.
4 The SOCIETY will
amend its B
5 of this its
to conform Y ith prior to the execut
6 this Agreement. the Articles listed
7 8.2 aws 'ncor
orated in this
8 The A reement.
SOCIETY
Bylaws are attached
9 within t to incorporate
his Agreement. and .
Any proposed
IO BYlaws, changes
Policies? to SOCIETY
11 terms of t � °r procedures which
his Agreement Conflict with the
12 review may be must be submitted to the CITY Y for
13 and the adopted by to
consent
SOCIETY. Of the CITY
I4 Article g
�----• Indemnification g
old Harmless.
15 The SOCIETY
agrees to defend
16 the CITY , 'indemnify and
17 and elected and appointed Officials
old harmless
agents from off
I8 any and all claims ' employees,
of action ° f demands f any kind and/or causes
1g of °r character Whatsoever or relatingever arising
20 to
the SOCIETY ing out
consultants, subcontractors.- its employees,
21 claims b or agents
Y any persons for any and all
9e 1
22 or damage Persons
alleged personal to theirinjury" death
23 or
caused solely property to
by negligent the extent
24 the SOCIETY acts, errors or omz'
ssions of
its
25 subco employees agents. Consultants
ntractors, or ns 1
26 - - ---- representatives and arising out of its
APMuseum
HI Agreement----~
Page 10
i
i
1 !
2 performance of this Agreement except where the claim,
3 demand, and/or cause of action arises as a result of the
4 negligent acts, errors or omissions of the CITY, its
elected and appointed officials, employees, or agents.
5
In the event that any suit or claim for damage is brought
6
against the CITY due to the actions of the SOCIETY, the i
SOCIETY will defend the CITY at its sole cost and
8
9 expense; provided that the CITY retains the right to
10 participate in the said suit if any principle of
11 governmental or public laws is involved; and if final
12 � judgement be rendered against the CITY and/or its
13
officers, agents or employees or any of them, or jointly
14 against the CITY and the SOCIETY and their representative
15 officers, agents, employees, or any of them, the SOCIETY
161 agrees to fully satisfy the same and the SOCIETY shall
17 reimburse the CITY for any cost and expense which the
18I CITY has incurred as a result of such claim or suit. The
19 provisions of this section shall survive the expiration
20 or termination of this Agreement as to any suit or claim
21 alleged acts, errors or omissions occurring during the
22 term of this Agreement.
23 Article 10 . Nondiscrimination.
24 The SOCIETY may not discriminate regarding any services,
25 membership, staff, or activities to which this Agreement
26
--------------------------------
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Page 1[
i
i
1
2 may apply directly or indirectly through contractual,
hiring, or other arrangements on the grounds of race,
3
4 color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, or
5 where there is the presence of any sensory, mental, or
physical handicap.
6
7 Article 11. Insurance.
8 The SOCIETY shall maintain throughout the term of this
9 Agreement comprehensive general liability insurance in
10 the amount of one million dollars combined single limits i
11 per occurrence. The insurance policy shall name the CITY I
12 of Auburn as additional insured. The policy shall
13
require a minimum of thirty (30) days prior written j
14 notice to the CITY of any cancellation or expiration o i
15 the policy or any modification of any provisions of the
16i policy.
17 Article 12 . Assignments.
18 The CITY and the SOCIETY respectively bind themselves,
I
19 their partners, successors, assigns, and legal
20 representatives to the other party to this Agreement with
21 respect to all covenants to this Agreement. Neither the
22 CITY nor the SOCIETY shall assign this Agreement without
23 the written consent of the other party. No other
24
governing or management agreement for the governance of
'
25
i
26
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Page 12
1
2 the Museum may be signed by the SOCIETY without prior
3 written agreement by the CITY.
4 Article 13 . General Provisions.
5 This Agreement shall be governed by any applicable laws,
6 regulations, and ordinances of the CITY, King County, the
I
7 State of Washington, and where applicable, Federal laws.
8 CITY OF AUBURN i
9
10
11 M A Y O R
12 '
13 ATTEST:
14
15 Robin Wohlhueter,
16 City Clerk
17 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
18
19 ,
20
Stephen R. Shelton,
21 City Attorney
22 AHITE RIVER VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
23
24 BY:
25 TITLE:
26
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Paee 13
i
1
2
3 STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss
COUNTY OF KING )
4
On this day of ► 1992,
5
6 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the
i
7 State of Washington, personally appeared
8
g
to me known to be the of
I
10 WHITE RIVER VALLEY HISTORICAL SOCIETY, the non-profit
i
11 corporation that executed the within and foregoing instrument,
12 and acknowledged said instrument to be the free and voluntary i
13 act and deed of said non-profit corporation, for the uses and
14 Purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she i,
15 authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said non-
16
profit corporation.
17 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and I
18 affixed my official seal the date hereinabove set forth. j
i
19 j
I
20 i
i
21 NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State
of Washington, residing at
22 MY COMMISSION expires:
23
i
24
25
26
I
Museum Agreement
April 20, 1992
Page 14
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 21 1992
PAGE 2
MUSEUM SERVICES AGREEMENT (J. HARRISI
Planning Director James Harris stated the City is being asked to
approve the White River Historical Society Museum agreement for
1992 . The agreement does not specify a dollar amount except to say
that Kent can appoint one member to the Board of Directors if
Kent's level of annual funding does not fall below $2,500. That
amount has been set aside in the 1992 budget.
Mr. Harris recommended that Kent pay the $2, 500 for 1992 . In
addition, he recommended that the City investigate the feasibility
of working with Kent citizens to explore the possibility of
establishing a Kent museum.
City Historian Rae Reitan reported that the old timers committee
has agreed to sponsor a Kent historical society. A meeting will be
held on Saturday, June 30, at 11: 30 a.m. at Mom's Kitchen. At this
meeting a chairman will be elected and a committee will be formed
to work on constitutional by-laws.
Linda Van Nest, President of the White River Historical Society,
expressed her thanks for Kent's support and stated that the Society
is still a regional facility and has not changed its goals for the
future.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Bennett SECONDED a
motion to approve the White River Historical Society Museum
agreement for 1992 . Planning Director Harris clarified that the
item will be placed on the consent calendar at the June 16, 1992
Council meeting. Motion carried.
FEDERAL WAY PLAN UPDATE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
(F. SATTERSTROM)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom reported that King county is
proposing to update the Federal Way Community Plan. He explained
that there is unincorporated land that lies between Auburn and
Federal Way that both cities are claiming in their urban growth
area. Mr. Satterstrom presented a map showing that this planning
area comes into Kent's sphere of interest in the Midway and Star
Lake areas. The agreement asks for Kent's commitment to coordinate
with King County in an interlocal planning process.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Bennett SECONDED a
motion to initiate the Federal Way Community Plan Update. Motion
carried.
Rent City Council Meeting
Date June 16 . 1992
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: EXCUSED ABSENCE FROM CITY COUNCIL MEETING
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approval of a request from Councilmember
Jim White for an excused absence from the June 16, 1992 City
Council meeting since he will be attending the AWC Convention.
•� �,,,� iL'��1'lr' La;'Gt,,? �,��,1 a -,,,�� �1 ryvl-' �� l�.G l�C! [L
to
U.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Councilmember White
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D ✓
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JIM WHITE, CITY COUNCIL MEMBER
DATE: JUNE 8, 1992 .
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL EXCUSED ABSENCE
I would like to request an excused absence from the June 16, 1992 City Council meeting since I will
be attending the Association of Washington Cities Convention in Bellevue.
Thank you for your consideration.
JW:jb
it
Kent City Council Meeting
ff Date June 16 , 1992
�1n Category Consent Calendar
�" nY
1. SUBJECT: WEST HILL ISLAND ANNEXATION - RESOLUTION
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution /316 setting
July 7, 1992 as the date for a public hearing for the West Hill
Island Annexation. The City Council Planning Committee passed
a motion on June 2 , 1992 to place this item on tonight's
consent calendar so the appropriate resolution can be prepared
announcing the City' s intent to annex the West Hill Island. In
general, this area is bounded on the West by Military Road, on
the north by SR 516, on the east by SR 516, and on the south by
approximately S. 240th and S. 244th extended.
/,4)
City Atty Lubovich announced that a new resolution has been prepared
to replace the resolution in the agenda packet . He explained that
the new resolution amends Section 1 by allowing for a street boundary
iZ Ct�n
and a map to be attached as an exhibit , a+rd that this would take the
place of a legal description. There were no objections to the amend-
ment from the Council , and the amendment was sw incorporated.
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO >< YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agen_¢a
Item No. 3E J(
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 2 , 1992
PAGE 3
WEST HILL ISLAND ANNEXATION (T. BRUBAKER)
Assistant City Attorney Tom Brubaker recommended the Committee pass
a motion directing him to draft a resolution announcing the City's
intent to annex the West Hill Island. He presented a timeline for
the annexation process and explained that if the Council passes the
resolution to annex at its June 16, 1992 meeting the date for the
public hearing would be set for the next Council meeting on July 7,
1992 . After taking public testimony, the Council can pass an
ordinance to annex the island which will not become effective for
45 days. During the 45 day period the ordinance is subject to
referendum. Since this is a small area, very few signature are
needed to initiate a referendum election and it is likely that the
necessary signatures will be received. The citizens will have
until August 21, 1991 to initiate a petition and the election would
occur either at the September 15, 1992 primary or November 31 1992
general election.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Bennett SECONDED a
motion to proceed with the annexation process. Councilmember
Johnson clarified that a resolution will go to the City Council on
June 16, 1992 to set a public hearing on July 7, 1992 . Margaret
Porter clarified that citizens of the affected area should be
notified of the public hearing on July 7, and Jim Harris added
individual notices should be sent to each resident. Tom Brubaker
added that notification should not take place until after the
Council passes the resolution on June 16. Motion carried.
PROCEDURES ON WETLANDS (C. PROUD)
At a prior Planning Committee meeting it was suggested that staff
make a presentation to the Committee so they may better understand
how wetlands in Kent are being administered. Senior Planner Carol
Proud presented an inventory map of the City of Kent wetlands, the
Interim Wetland Guidelines, and used as an example the review
process for a single family residential permit when a sensitive
area such as creeks, hillsides or wetlands are impacted.
ADDED ITEMS
CHESTNUT RIDGE PROPOSED ANNEXATION (J. HARRIS)
Planning Director Harris informed the Committee that a ten percent
annexation petition has been received from the citizens of a single
family area known as Chestnut Ridge. This area lies between South
200 and 208 Street and 100 Avenue SE and the Valley Freeway. Mr.
Harris stated if the Council accepts the petition the Planning
department will have to do a SEPA checklist and the cost benefits
WEST HILL AREA
UNDER CONSIDERATION
FOR ANNEXATION TO
I
THE CITY OF KENT
p( ' fir , , i
}+l.lV
p l_r II �I�
Illrlll�l'+V
1\�A11+
14',I
��J � \} Illli \�\It'lVIII I
/irilj I VA I
EtP[I—
RLU
I �1 �r �� � rlp�rlllIIIII Ir
� 1 it llll�lll l
/ ii
L? c r / lll
� IIII\ r
�i
_
�_ \+ 1 l\illllllll \I I f I�jii ii%i//iii,/��
\� iii iii % ill \
�111� �/
I �� \ + 1 � I!r ��� I/Illll�lpi�lllV/ll4 f(f I ) v��� +1}II�IIII�IIII�IIIlllll�llllllVl I!(llp�I 1 v +�V� \
+ v v � ll� / vpig y/�irrlq Iv,I }+vvwtillw, ��� �1�1}�luall I�III1�Avvvv\illl(1 f I � v� v
ll
,
/jii%y \
/,,,��i,��vv
\
/,rrr vvIA
Q DI 1vQ I I 111 Av1 I l\\\v�\ %%u�///// !\1( \��Q �fl�l���I�ll1+111���l�ll�j�(l�G��yrl(�Ifjll I�jl1A1l\ I I v
///r/ mVlllillrl( Illllll},I++}II\\I I++ t,,
1
Ellr�ll(i,lr
l I 1 , I \ --�v \ V I I I'lll�lll�VA0 A VAj AI+,�Ayb\VAS"'� A
� I v ❑ � �I , ( .� v o
\ ❑ Cj ' /y"
� /
p ` /
n lZ / T /'/ \VAr i� Illlrllll (l�l, �A
_
7���6V /iC/'/ ������ �n
A RESOLUTION of the City
Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, declaring the intention
of the City Council to annex a
certain island of territory
contiguous to the city limits of the
City of Kent.
WHEREAS, the boundaries of certain unincorporated territory
are entirely contiguous with the boundaries of the City of Kent;
and
WHEREAS, the entire area of unincorporated territory comprises
less than one hundred acres; and
WHEREAS, the area of unincorporated territory constitutes an
"island of territory" as defined in RCW 35A. 14 . 295; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the interests of
the people of the City of Kent would be best served if said lands
were annexed to and became a part of the City of Kent. NOW,
THEREFORE,
The City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, does hereby
resolve as follows:
Section 1. An island of unincorporated territory bounded on
all sides by the boundaries of the City of Kent (hereafter, the
"West Hill Island") , which is legally described as follows:
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN
should be annexed to the City of Kent.
1
I
Section 2 . As nearly as can be determined, there are 144
registered voters in the West Hill Island.
i
Section 3 . Notice is hereby given that a public hearing shall
jibe held in the Council Chambers of the Kent City Hall during the
I regularly scheduled City Council Meeting to be held on Tuesday,
�iJuly 7, 1992 , at 7: 00 p.m. , Pacific Daylight Time; further, the
i
! City Clerk shall publish notice of the public hearing at least once
a week for two weeks prior to the date of the hearing in one or
more newspapers of general circulation within the City of Kent and
within the West Hill Island.
Section 4 . The City's existing services, utilities and parks
will benefit the West Hill Island and, therefore, should the City
annex the area, the property within the annexation should assume
the existing indebtedness of the City of Kent and the City should
assess and tax the West Hill Island at the same rate and upon the
same basis as other property within the City of Kent and,
consequently, any ordinance annexing the West Hill Island shall so
provide.
Section 5. Any ordinance annexing the West Hill Island shall
not adopt additional zoning regulations pursuant to RAW 35A. 14 . 330
et sea. ; rather, the City of Kent shall implement its existing
zoning regulations that apply to newly annexed territory.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, this day of , 1992 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day
of 1992 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
I
2
i
j�
i
�f Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16. 1992
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, acceptance of 10 percent notice of intent for
annexation of approximately 190 acres north of So. 208th Street
between 92nd Ave. So. and 100 Ave. S.E. and authorization to
set July 7 as date to meet with the initiators.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Public Works Director, vicinity map
and excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO \ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F X
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 27, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM b"V
RE: CHESTNUT RIDGE ANNEXATION
We have received a 10% petition for annexation of approximately 190
acres north of S. 208th Street between 92nd Avenue S. and 100th
Avenue S.E. The Property Manager has verified the signatures on
the petition.
RCW 35. 13 . 125 requires that the legislative body set a date to meet
with the petitioners no later than sixty days from receipt of the
annexation request. At that time, the Council will determine
whether to accept the proposed annexation and to authorize the
circulation of the 60% petition.
We are recommending that Council set July 7 as date to meet with
the petitioners.
k1W
. .. ... ......eiIIA1 IC706 At!j p s 117 l21 \� Maric Plci1(.r� QI _
Cafhcnnc Nm�$ab°oIOM
151 f<. '.�-- G. Fors Iq uy
Q
s_a °re a� =•1 w ads
ilex na at, eok oao\c 101 I17 1.Ha '•
s•to loos
n w1• — .. —. z- �r n' zPlrt•oxa seeeJOJI
�202 0;- �+bTr;=L„r-4-s 202 ST n Trlum u w q�
mc
41,
°„ \P 'i"_ p {
�_ i W e'
. r2 i,III Izl U7
F F,/I Sp]B.O12 .t^ pLJ
'� xfv i.'u n .,..IfT\ aer va.
'�\f
`/ICto,pie Tbrl • °• °�p JtL p "k
-7 — 1 w ':7 I _m ci. _ �5a ° 203RL ST. °
y 016 At. Is/n ^ �+^�".vI °•J"sSd Li• J+'" n'•
041 At. tl Ixlp-
:.'�'-- /1 Sv]Bf041 / _ ° J. i !°J/� I., !6 ;ft y/Jy •�I
--T� `l i ' 1 / ••F 4 a.` xe •tfo t`1(}N�,JJ� /
1, f .: •., rp° `1 +, ♦ �/'•�. , +'
_v ,r•r :.
HEa.S1TJNU a d � ,x W N
204T-ry��'t �x%+ ,�h•' .p •13
tt a i121 a'Ix i d' .$.,, wlt ua uy. /Olv/'/ cj ^•^ •OEr q
�' w% .�°.� .• a Ir. c sr n ''inn ,n I t ]r____
fix _ ; ul i. J R''I'•;:D`-G adu liV dd 9� f a •°s. I: L yL - �I
Y ' = at°'1vE�' v r
l0�
P '
'+:'"✓' -
i 5 24J „l.eS. 2057'H sL. - S..Y Tit,ATEr ..I\ 8
- e Ei]4
r J &A 1600.2 •"
s' IJ'
— N C E N T R A L1) _ JI-F . . e p „ _ ,: ,J p a N: d=� 0' J I M P R 0 V-
i Tri—� "— =-17T1— o •e I- f
i W =
Y I W E S- A�G'S t
IL
12 I ------_ . S.• 206TH PL. '
II i;F 2w I
EIEI .\• x: ]/STA� YI W ESTATES
�NO.a
\ \nl _I _ •11 1�, 'n`�t� "LI r �SP]B]059 .I•� }o Iw_ -
Ja I �L.JJ ` - 1.5 UI }p co
i COMPANY S ! FRU ITL°AN .!� ,`-ADD
- - •A s 5. °!� 207TH.,°Pl.° °_. _ 5-JL--r' n' 1. ; �i
13 .I ,. ... .F I L. nl 11 liz tt 15 J'16 1 -
w '��1'�1
=+. O'i s;rw J. �-r i6 _S-L n ° I UL'->cl-I���Illl ��1 ill Its lrl��'IIII IIIIII FIB--
�^-- S.�—_ -=2087H==ST'— e�--
���� x O a IIQ-_i OTI i i Ej
UI ,' L-
I CIA
3Q E.
4EI A,Ii
OIOs9lt
(4)
�'N' n ea✓. No-+es ++E`{./;l aw S. 210THI':lLQy -PL.
4./yr2v_' S `,• � L?I.�"�:•V,'-�li�3J' I
16ZAc
'- gip, 171 �• O ;,� \V.` Qom' l9 r;c .\
�' / .,� 1 it :. _^. ❑ xb{J. ] 1i"'
^ ic9N. ,, / • pp� ice+ 4l
'I�'44-• �� 4 .1 2 •�y��+,' °� j%# 4` ICJ I�
(L111 gal
u
14
�', I J-i/C P _ '!'• '',. 7 y?� \ �I��yl.,..S �_ 7 �)+•�' Sr' :</�s;U• _.�q 4i
$
21'JZ ly "' ! 9 S y(ZE nfjl-° CdI
at k
PUBLIC WORKS COMM TTEE
JUNE 39 1992
PRESENT: JIM WHITE TONY MCCARTHY
PAUL MANN DICK GILLISSE
JIM BENNETT PATRICE THORELL
DON WICKSTROM BILL DOOLITTLE
TOM BRUBAKER HOWARD WOODWARD
GARY GILL DIANA WOODWARD
ED CHOW JOAN JANSEN
ED WHITE
Chestnut Ridge Annexation
Wickstrom explained the annexation was initiated by the property
owners of the area. It involves about 190 acres. We have received
a 10% petition for annexation and according to State law, the City
has to act on that petition within sixty days of receipt.
Wickstrom added that we have not completed the financial analysis
of the annexation but would have that available for Council at
their public meeting with the petitioners. It was recommended the
date for the public meeting be set for July 7 .
Ms. Jansen who is chairperson of the annexation committee commented
that they are excited about the possibility of annexation primarily
for additional police protection but they want to become a part of
the Kent community. She commented that Renton was also considering
annexation of their area and there is little enthusiasm on the part
of the homeowners to become a part of Renton. She added she
thought the assessed valuation of their area, approximately $38
million, would bring in additional revenue for the City. Howard
Woodward who is president of the homeowners association spoke in
further support of the annexation.
Jim White stated that the general rule of thumb is that annexation
of single family property does not generate as much revenue as it
costs to service whereas warehousing is about equal and retail is
a plus. That is why a financial analysis is essential for the
Council information. He added he thinks the City should be
annexing and bringing in those who have a Kent address, are served
by Kent schools, Kent parks department programs and Kent utilities,
Kent fire and possibly even police.
The Committee unanimously recommended approval to set July 7 as
date to meet with the petitioners.
1Vt�
(1 Kent City Council Meeting
� Date June 16, 1992
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: STREET CLOSURE - BALLOON CLASSIC
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, adoption of Ordinances authorizing closure of
certain public streets.
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance and excerpt from Public Works Committee
minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3GX
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, relating to the Kent
International Balloon Classic; authorizing
closure of certain public streets for a
public festival.
WHEREAS, the Kent International Balloon Classic has
been an annual festival celebration in the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, the Kent International Balloon Classic is a
result of the efforts of a number of private volunteers,
citizens, civic groups, non-profit organizations, and the City of
Kent Parks and Recreation Department; and
WHEREAS, a closure of certain public streets is deemed
appropriate for the safe operation and maintenance of the
festival celebrations; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following described public areas and
rights-of-way will be closed to normal vehicle traffic during the
times and pursuant to the terms and conditions as set forth below
for the purpose of conducting the Kent International Balloon
Classic festivities:
(A) Russell Road Closure
Friday July 17 1992 4 p.m. - 11 P.m.
Russell Road will be closed from the intersection
located at James Street south to the north side of the Meeker
Street intersection and from the south side of the Meeker Street
intersection south to the street end or dike.
Section 2 . City and Local Access. The City reserves
for itself, its officers, employees, agents and contractors,
access to the closed rights-of-way and public areas at all
reasonable times for the purpose of emergency response and other
public safety demands, inspection, cleaning, or other City
responsibilities. Local residents shall retain access.
Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its
final approval and passage as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
2
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
• ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of , 1992 .
APPROVED the day of 1992 .
PUBLISHED the day of , 1992 .
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City
of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
balloon.ord
3
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 2
Street Closures Ordinances - Balloon Classic and Canterbury Faire
Wickstrom explained these were housekeeping ordinances in order to
be able to close the streets for these events. The ordinances are
the same as has been adopted in previous years. Patrice Thorell
stated that the only difference was that closure of Russell Road
from Meeker south to the dike was added to the ordinance for the
Balloon Classic. The committee unanimously recommended adoption of
the ordinances.
1992 Asphalt Overlay
Wickstrom stated that three bids were received. The low bidder for
all the schedules was Lakeside Industries with M.A. Segale being
the second low. These two bids were within $400 of each other.
The budget only allows us to complete the first four schedules of
the project. In calculating the bids submitted for those four
schedules, M.A. Segale would then be the low bidder. Jim Bennett
asked if we had that option. Wickstrom clarified that the
specifications clearly state that we have the option of deleting
schedules.
Paul Mann referred to a Reader's Digest article citing the problem
with the poor condition of streets in the United States is that we
award to the lowest bidder He questioned if we always award to
the lowest bidder. Wickstrom responded that State law requires us
to accept the lowest responsible bidder. Jim Bennett stated he
feels the citizens might be better served by other than the lowest
bidder. He referred to the process in Europe of selecting a mean
of the bids received. Tom Brubaker added there is some latitude in
the statute if we have substantiation that the lowest bidder is not
a responsible bidder.
Gary Gill added that regardless which contractor is awarded the
contract, the specifications require certain quality assurance and
quality control requirements to be met.
The Committee unanimously recommended approval to award the bid to
M.A. Segale for the first four schedules of the project.
North Park Sanitary Sewer
Wickstrom stated that eight bids were received with the low bid
submitted by Robison Construction. The project rebuilds two
sections of the sewer servicing the North Park area. This is a
joint project with Metro as a pilot project to determine a method
of controlling infiltration/inflow into the sewer. Eliminating
infiltration/inflow lengthens the life of the treatment facilities
• 0.�.2 Kent City Council Meeting
L Date June 16, 1992
1 Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: STREET CLOSURE - CANTERBURY FAIRE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, adoption of Ordinance 3�`( authorizing closure of
certain public streets.
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance and excerpt from Public Works Committee
minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO >% YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H K
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, relating to Canterbury Faire;
authorizing closure of certain public streets
for a public festival .
WHEREAS, Canterbury Faire has been an annual festival
celebration in the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, Canterbury Faire is a result of the efforts of
a number of private volunteers, citizens, civic groups, non-
profit organizations, and the City of Kent Parks and Recreation
Department; and
WHEREAS, a closure of certain public streets is deemed
appropriate for the safe operation and maintenance of the
festival celebrations; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The following described public areas and
rights-of-way will be closed to normal vehicle traffic during the
times and pursuant to the terms and conditicns as set forth below
for the purpose of conducting the Canterbury Faire festivities:
(A) East Titus Street Closure
Saturday August 15 1992 and Sunday, August 16,
1992 8 a.m. - 8 P.M.
East Titus Street will be closed from the south
side of the intersection located at Smith Street south to north
of the intersection at Reiten Road.
(B) West Meeker Street Closure
Saturday August 15 1992 8 a.m. - 6 p.m.
West Meeker Street will be closed from the east
side of the intersection located at Fourth Avenue to the west
side of the intersection located at Railroad Avenue.
(C) North Second Avenue Closure
Saturday August 15 1992 8 a.m. - 6 p.m.
North Second Avenue will be closed from the north
side of the Gowe Street intersection to the south side of the
West Harrison intersection.
(D) North First Avenue Closure
Saturday August 15 1992 8 a.m. - 6 p.m.
North First Avenue will be closed from the north
side of the Titus Street intersection to the south side of the
West Gowe Street intersection and from the north side of the West
Gowe Street intersection to the Kent Library cul-de-sac.
(E) South 228th Street 64th Avenue South and Landing
Way Closure
Saturday August 15 1992 8 a.m. - 6 p.m.
South 228th Street will be closed from the west
side of Landing Way to the east side of 64th Avenue S . 64th
Avenue S. will be closed from the north side of S. 228th Street
to the south side of Landing Way and Landing Way will be closed
from the intersection of S. 228th St. to the intersection at 64th
Avenue S .
2
I
Section 2 . City Access. The City reserves for itself,
its officers, employees, agents and contractors, access to the
closed rights-of-way and public areas at all reasonable times for
the purpose of emergency response and other public safety
demands, inspection, cleaning, or other City responsibilities.
Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its
final approval and passage as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of , 1992 .
APPROVED the day of , 1992 .
PUBLISHED the day of 1992 .
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
of Ordinance No. passed by the City Council of the
3
City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City
of Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
cantfr.ord
4
Public Works Committee
June 3, 1992
Page 2
Street Closures Ordinances - Balloon Classic and Canterbury Faire
Wickstrom explained these were housekeeping ordinances in order to
be able to close the streets for these events. The ordinances are
the same as has been adopted in previous years. Patrice Thorell
stated that the only difference was that closure of Russell Road
from Meeker south to the dike was added to the ordinance for the
Balloon Classic. The committee unanimously recommended adoption of
the ordinances.
1992 Asphalt Overlay
Wickstrom stated that three bids were received. The low bidder for
all the schedules was Lakeside Industries with M.A. Segale being
the second low. These two bids were within $400 of each other.
The budget only allows us to complete the first four schedules of
the project. In calculating the bids submitted for those four
schedules, M.A. Segale would then be the low bidder. Jim Bennett
asked if we had that option. Wickstrom clarified that the
specifications clearly state that we have the option of deleting
schedules.
Paul Mann referred to a Reader's Digest article citing the problem
with the poor condition of streets in the United States is that we
award to the lowest bidder He questioned if we always award to
the lowest bidder. Wickstrom responded that State law requires us
to accept the lowest responsible bidder. Jim Bennett stated he
feels the citizens might be better served by other than the lowest
bidder. He referred to the process in Europe of selecting a mean
of the bids received. Tom Brubaker added there is some latitude in
the statute if we have substantiation that the lowest bidder is not
a responsible bidder.
Gary Gill added that regardless which contractor is awarded the
contract, the specifications require certain quality assurance and
quality control requirements to be met.
The Committee unanimously recommended approval to award the bid to
M.A. Segale for the first four schedules of the project.
North Park Sanitary Sewer
Wickstrom stated that eight bids were received with the low bid
submitted by Robison Construction. The project rebuilds two
sections of the sewer servicing the North Park area. This is a
joint project with Metro as a pilot project to determine a method
of controlling infiltration/inflow into the sewer. Eliminating
infiltration/inflow lengthens the life of the treatm4nt facilities
�h Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16. 1992
Category Consent Calendar
i
1. SUBJECT: STREET CLOSURE - CORNUCOPIA DAYS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, adoption of Ordinance granting a street use
permit to Kent Lion' s Club for the Cornucopia Days festival.
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance and excerpt from Public Works Committee
minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO >� YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I A
ii
it
i
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington,
relating to Kent Cornucopia Days; granting a street use
permit to Kent Lions Club for a public festival;
specifying terms and conditions for such street use.
WHEREAS, Kent Cornucopia Days has been an annual
festival celebrating the heritage of the Kent community; and
WHEREAS, the Cornucopia Days festival continues to grow
in size annually; and
WHEREAS, Cornucopia Days is a result of the efforts of a
number of private volunteers, citizens, civic groups, and
nonprofit organizations ; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent is not the sponsor nor
operator of the Kent Cornucopia Days festival; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to clarify the rights,
responsibilities and relationships of those parties involved in
the Kent Cornucopia Days , activities; NOW THEREFORE,
- 1 -
THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A street use permit is hereby authorized
from Thursday, July 9 , 1992 , 9 : 00 p.m. , until Sunday, July 12 ,
1992 , 11: 00 p.m. , for the following described public areas and
right-of-ways which will be closed to normal vehicle traffic
during the term of the permit except as otherwise noted below:
(A) Meeker Street from 6th Avenue to Railroad Avenue
(4th Avenue to remain open) ,
(B) 2nd Avenue from Meeker Street to Gowe Street,
(C) 1st Avenue from new Kent Library to Titus Street
with restricted access at 4th Avenue (Gowe Street to remain
open) ,
(D) 2nd Avenue from Gowe Street to Titus Street,
(with local access signs at Titus)
(E) 2nd Avenue from Meeker Street to Smith Street for
the purposes of Saturday Market.
(F) Municipal parking lot between Smith and Harrison
and 2nd and 4th Avenues; provided, however, that such closure
shall be for the purposes of Cornucopia Carnival from 6: 00 a.m. ,
Wednesday, July 8, 1992 through 2 : 00 p.m. , Monday, July 13 , 1992 .
2 -
i
• I
�I
Ij
I'
(G) 5th Avenue behind Kent Elementary for children' s
, parade and parade assembly; Saar Street north on 4th Avenue to
Harrison Street; provided, however, that such closure shall be
only for the purposes of the children' s parade and only on
Sunday, July 12 , 1992 from 11: 00 a.m. until 2 : 00 p.m.
(H) 4th Avenue from James Street (240th Avenue S .E. ) to
Saar Street for parade and parade assembly; and the two eastbound
lanes of James Street and Borden Field from 1st Avenue to 4th
Avenue; and First Avenue from Smith Street to James Street;
provided, however, that such closure shall be for the purposes of
the Cornucopia Parade on Sunday, July 12, 1992 from 11: 30 a.m.
until 4 : 00 p.m. The parade route proceeds southbound on 4th
Avenue to Saar Street commencing at 2 : 00 p.m.
Section 2 . The street use permit provided in Section 1
above is granted to the Kent Lions Club (hereinafter referred to
as the "User") and its successors and assigns. By this permit,
the User is authorized to conduct a public festival on said
public property and right-of-way, to erect booths, conduct lawful
and licensed games, provide entertainment, operate or authorize
food and beverage services, and conduct such other activities
consistent with a public festival at the times and in accordance
with the provisions in Section 1.
Section 3 . The permit granted hereby is conditioned
upon and subject to User's satisfaction of the following
conditions:
3 -
i
3 . 1. LICENSES AND TAXES. The User shall be liable for,
, and shall pay throughout the term of this use, all license and
fees covering the business and activities conducted on the
premises, and all unemployment insurance, social security,
workers' compensation and other obligations applicable to its
activities, and otherwise fulfill all fiscal obligations imposed
by law or contract.
3 . 2 . UTILITIES. The User, at the User' s sole expense,
shall provide, or shall otherwise pay for, when due, all costs
for providing all utilities and other services and installation
occasioned by the User' s requirements. The City shall not be
liable for any injury, loss or damage caused by or resulting from
any interruption or failure of utility services due to any causes
whatsoever, except the City's sole negligence.
3 . 3 . LIABILITY.
3 . 3 . 1. Indemnification: The User, its successors
or assigns shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless
. from any and all claims, actions, damages and/or judgments
whatsoever arising out of any and all activity, use and
occupation of said public property and right-of-way pursuant to
the subject permit including claims arising by reason of
accident, injury or death caused to persons or property of any
kind unless caused by the City's sole negligence.
3 . 3 . 2 . Assumption of Risk: The placement and
storage of personal property on said public right-of-way by the
- 4 -
!! User shall be the responsibility of, and the sole risk of the
II i
User.
3 . 3 . 3 . Insurance: During the term of this permit
'hand any extbnsion thereof, the User shall secure and maintain a
; policy of standard form comprehensive general liability insurance
with an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of
Washington, providing protection and indemnification against any
, and all claims for injury or disability to person, damage to
' property or for loss of life, which may arise from or be related
to this activity or the permit granted herein, including the
liability of the City its officers, officials, agents or
employees for such to the User and any of the User' s officers,
employees and agents, and any liability of the User as such to
the City, its officers, employees and agents, arising out of or
in connection with the occupancy and use of the public
right-of-way as well as any and all claims and risks in
connection with any acts or omissions performed by User by virtue
of the rights granted pursuant to this permit. Said policy
limits shall be in the amount of one million dollars ($1, 000, 000)
, for injury to or loss of life of any individual person; in the
aggregate for personal injuries suffered in each occurrence; and
for property damage suffered in each occurrence. Said policy
must specifically name The City of Kent, its officers, employees
and elected officials as additional insured parties thereunder
and must stipulate that the coverages provided by said policy
shall not be terminated, reduced, or otherwise changed in any
respect without providing at least thirty (30) days prior written
notice to The City of Kent. In any event, no termination,
reduction or change in coverage shall occur after June 10, 1992 ,
5 -
� Ili
i
i
i' or 30 days prior to the scheduled event for which this permit has
:ibeen issued. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the
contrary, the failure of the User to comply with the provision of
is
': this section shall subject this Street Use Permit to immediate
; termination without notice and without recourse by any person in
corder to protect the public interest. The applicant shall
,, furnish a certificate of such insurance coverage to the City
,: prior to issuance of permit, and may be required, at the City's
discretion, to provide a copy of the entire insurance policy.
3 . 3 .4 . Adjustments of Claims: The User shall
provide for the prompt and efficient handling of all claims from
third parties for bodily injury, property damage or theft arising
out of the activities of the User under this permit. The User
' agrees that all such claims, whether processed by the User or
User' s insurer, either directly or by means of an agent, will be
' handled by a person with a permanent office in the Kent-Seattle
area.
3 . 4 . USE AND CARE OF PREMISES.
3 .4 . 1. General Condition: The premises shall at
,; all times be kept in a neat, clean, safe and sanitary condition,
and kept and used in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington and ordinances of The City of Kent, and in accordance
with all authorized rules and regulations of the King County
. Health Department, Kent Fire Marshal, Kent Building Inspector,
land other proper officers of The City of Kent, at the sole cost
and expense of the User. The User shall not permit any waste,
damage, or injury to the public property or right-of-way; shall
6 -
i
li
�I
I,
it
l
' I
1
Knot permit any objectionable noise or odor to escape or to be
iadmitted from said public areas or permit anything to be done
upon said premises that in any way will create a nuisance.
3 .4 . 2 . Alterations: The User shall not make, or
, cause to be made, any alteration, addition or improvement in said
public right-of-way other than those authorized above without
first obtaining the written consent of the City for such work.
3 .4 . 3 . Access: The City reserves for itself, its
: officers, employees, agents and contractors, free access to said
premises at all reasonable times for the purposes of emergency
response and other public safety demands, inspection, cleaning,
or other City responsibilities.
3 . 5. NON DISCRIMINATION. The User shall comply with
all federal , state and local laws and ordinances prohibiting
discrimination in employment or public accommodation with regard
to age, sex, race, color, creed, national origin, marital status
or physical or mental handicap.
3 . 6. RELATIONSHIP. In no event shall the City be
; construed, or held to have become in any way or for any purpose a
{ partner, associate, or joint venturer of the User or any party
lassociated with the User in the conduct of the User's activities
relating to Cornucopia Days. This permit does not constitute the
User the agent or legal representative of the City for any
purpose whatsoever.
i
- 7 -
'I
I'
i
i
n
iI
I�
3_7. AMENDMENTS. The City expressly reserve the right
Into amend the terms of this permit from time to time as may be
( necessary to preserve the public health, safety and welfare.
'' Provided, however, that no amendment, alternation or modification
of the terms or conditions of this permit shall be valid and
; binding unless made in writing to the User within fourteen (14)
; days of the effective date of said amendment, alternation or
';imodification.
3 . 8 . NO WAIVER OF DEFAULT. The City does not waive
full compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit by
acceptance of the permit fees. No waiver of default by the City
of any of the terms, covenants and conditions hereof to be
performed, kept and observed by the User shall be construed as,
or operate as, a waiver of any subsequent default of any of the
terms, covenants and conditions herein contained, to be
performed, kept and observed by the other party.
3 .9 . SURRENDER OF PREMISES. At the expiration or
termination of this permit, including any extensions thereof,
whichever is earlier, the User shall quit and surrender said
premises, without notice and in as good condition as received at
commencement of the term, ordinary wear and tear uncontrollable
by the User excepted.
3 . 10. CONSTRUCTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION. This street
, use permit shall be construed under all the applicable laws,
statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations of the United States,
State of Washington, County of King and the City of Kent in case
8 -
l
Ili
i
ii
Of a dispute between the parties. Jurisdiction of any resulting
i i
jlitigation shall be in King County Superior Court.
If legal action is instituted, the User agrees to pay
Ball of the City's reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred in
!, connection therewith.
I
3 . 11. The User shall not interfere with the City's
;! maintenance and use of the right-of-way, or the operation of the
;' Kent Saturday Market or other licensed businesses and premises.
The User shall also be responsible for obtaining necessary
. permits for use of property administered by the Department of
Parks and Recreation.
3 . 12 . The City of Kent, its agents and employees, will
, perform no maintenance, repair work of any kind on User' s
installations, equipment, or appurtenances without first
obtaining permission from the User. Provided, however, the City
may perform such maintenance, repair or work in an emergency.
3 . 13 . INVALIDITY OF PROVISIONS. Should any term,
provision, condition or other portion of this permit be held to
Abe inoperative, invalid or void, the same shall not affect any
other term, provision, condition or other portion of this permit;
and the remainder of this permit shall be effective as if such
term, provision, condition or portion had not been contained
herein.
9 -
i
I
Ij
i
Ij
Section 4 . FEES AND CHARGES
4_1. FEE. The fee for the above identified permit
shall be twenty-five dollars ($25. 00) payable in advance to the
City Treasurer at Kent City Hall, 220 4th Avenue South, Kent,
Washington 98032-5895 on or before July 3, 1992, plus five
percent of gross receipts from street fair booth sales, not to
. exceed five hundred dollars ($500. 00) payable to the City
! Treasurer on or before September 21, 1992 . A copy of User's
proof of insurance certificate shall be submitted at the time
this fee is paid.
4 . 2 . AUDIT. The User shall permit the City, as City
deems necessary, to inspect and audit in Kent, Washington at any
and all reasonable times, all pertinent books and records of the
User and any subcontractors or other person or entity that is in
connection with, or related to the User under this permit to
verify the accuracy of accounting records, including trust
accounts if any; and shall supply City with, or shall permit the
City to make, a copy of any books and records and any portion
thereof, upon the_ City' s request.
4 . 3 . The User shall have the right to charge user fees
or festival permits for the areas described in Section 11 above.
The User shall also be granted the authority to charge user fees
or festival permits to street vendors and merchants within two
blocks of the area described in Section 1 above. The User' s
right to charge festival permit and user fees shall extend only
for the term of this street use permit, and shall not apply to
10 -
i
i
I
i
I
l
merchants and businesses with current business licenses within
Ithe areas designated herein.
Section 5. An authorized representative of user shall
execute an agreement with the City confirming acceptance of the
conditions herein. The Mayor is authorized to execute said
agreement and such other documents necessary to the
, administration of this ordinance.
Section 6. Two hour parking restrictions as provided in
Chapter 10. 06 Kent City Code for the following streets are
eliminated during the period of Cornucopia Days, and shall not be
enforced during said period: Central Avenue to Union Pacific
Railroad and James Street to Willis Street.
Section 7 . A sufficient number of handicap parking
spaces shall be provided in close proximity to festival site on
2nd Avenue between Gowe St. and the post office driveway.
Section 8 . Any act consistent with the authority and
,,; prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified
and confirmed.
Section 9 . Effective Date. Pursuant to Leonard v.
, Bothell, 87 Wn. 2d 847 (1976) , this ordinance shall take effect
Viand be in force five (5) days from the time of its final passage
i'
, as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ii
i
-
i
I
I�
I,
ATTEST:
L BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of , 1992 .
APPROVED the day of 1992 •
PUBLISHED the day of , 1992 .
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of
Ordinance No. , passed by the City Council of the City
of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of
Kent as hereon indicated.
(SEAL)
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
cornucop.ord
n
i
12 -
II �
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 4
Jim White confirmed that the Chamber has reviewed this. Jim
Bennett asked about staffing for the program. Wickstrom explained
that we have a consultant who is developing the program. Tom
Brubaker brought to the committee's attention that they have a
draft of the agreement. We should be receiving the final form
before the June 16 Council meeting. In order to meet the required
time frame for signature, he asked for authority to make any minor
modifications that may be required with the understanding that if
any substantial changes are required we will bring it back before
the Committee. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
signature of the Commute Trip Reduction Plan interlocal agreement
upon approval of the final form by the City Attorney.
Central Avenue Improvement (Lowe to Titus) TIB Grant
Wickstrom stated we have received a construction grant from the
Transportation Improvement Board for the improvement of Central
between Gowe and Titus. This is a one-block widening project which
adds a right turn lane at Gowe and Titus as well an overlay from
Willis to Smith Street. The Committee unanimously recommended
approval to accept the grant and authorization for the Mayor to
sign.
POW Cornucopia Days Ordinance
This ordinance is similar to what has been adopted in previous
years authorizing street closure for Cornucopia Days. The
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance.
Ed White asked if there were another way to effect these street
closures for the various festivals without going to Public Works
and Council each year. It was determined that adopting the
ordinances each year is the best way. Jim Bennett commented about
possibly finding another site for the Balloon Classic so revenue is
not taken from a revenue producing facility.
Cannon Drive Barrier
Jim White stated he had been contacted by a number of citizens as
to why we did not install the jersey barriers further up Canyon.
He asked staff to look into the costs and possibility of installing
additional barriers further east on Canyon possibly up to 101st by
the high school. Wickstrom stated we could look at the project for
inclusion in the six year street program. Tom Brubaker added there
would possibly be condemnation issues to address and should be
considered as part of the costs .
G� Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16, 1992
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: DEAD TREE SHORT PLAT/FAMILY HOMES SHORT PLAT #1
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, acceptance of the bill of sale and warranty
agreement submitted by MDI/Profit Sharing Plan (Paul Morford)
for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately
340 feet of water main extension and 315 feet of street
improvements constructed in the vicinity of 113th Ave. S.E.
north of S.E. 256th for the Dead Tree Short Plat and Family
Homes Short Plat #1 and release of the cash bond after
expiration of the one-year maintenance period.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Public Works Director, vicinity map
and excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO /\ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS-
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Age da
Item No. 3J
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 3
or reduces the size of future additions. Metro is paying 56% of
the cost of this project. Wickstrom added we are recommending
award to Robison Construction. The Committee unanimously
recommended accepting the bid of Robison Construction.
Used Oil Collection Event
Wickstrom stated we applied for a grant to hold two used motor oil
collection events. We have received grant approval paying for the
costs involved in holding the event with no match from the City.
Since the grant agreement will not be signed in time to hold the
first event in July, the Health Department has given us
authorization to expend funds prior to signing the actual
agreement. The initial costs would come from the Environmental
Fund which would be reimbursed by the grant. The Executive
Committee has approved this approach. It was explained that two
sites would be available on July 18 with one site being the city
shops area and the other the East Hill fire station on 116th.
Participants would be able to bring their used motor oil for
disposition. The Committee unanimously recommended adopting the
used oil collection grant funds that are made available and to
proceed with this project.
Dead Tree Short Plat
Wickstrom explained that a water extension and some street
improvements were constructed by the developer of the Dead Tree
Short. Those improvements are completed and the developer is now
asking for the City to accept same. The Committee unanimously
recommended approval to accept the improvements.
Interagency Agreement with King County - 196th/200th Corridor
Wickstrom stated this agreement is for the design of the west leg
of the 196th corridor from Orillia over to WVH. This is a joint
project with the County. The County is willing to pay their share
of the project from the middle of the river over to Orillia. We
have a TIB grant and street utility funds to pay the City's portion
of the project. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement
Wickstrom explained this is an interlocal agreement with the County
which enables us to secure State funding for the Commute Trip
Reduction Program we are required to implement. The City would be
eligible for approximately $130, 000 over a two year period. There
are approximately 64 businesses in Kent that exceed 100 employees.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 27, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
RE: DEAD TREE SHORT PLAT
The developer of the Dead Tree Short Plat has completed the utility
extensions in the vicinity of 113th Avenue S.E. north of S.E. 256th
and is requesting the City accept the improvements.
We recommend the acceptance of approximately 340 feet of water main
extension and 315 feet of street improvements for continuous
operation and maintenance and release of the cash bond after the
one year maintenance period.
i
E (r
i
w i
F i
i r
# W CV
irTF� sT
SITES , w'
r•r COD ! i
i -lT
E �Y.
1_ 1 ..T
� r _7 �
c
N I .T Y
1
1
n
dry Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16 1992
Category Consent Calendar
I. SUBJECT: 196TH/200TH CORRIDOR
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign an interagency
agreement with King County naming Kent as lead agency for
design of west leg of 196th/200th Street Corridor.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Public Works Director, agreement and
excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT NO__ YES
FISCAL PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3KvX
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 27, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
RE: 196TH/200TH CORRIDOR - WEST LEG
An interagency agreement between King County and Kent has been
developed giving Kent lead agency status on the west leg of the
196th/200th Street Corridor.
Kent would assume the lead for the design, SEPA, permitting,
property acquisition and public involvement. Construction of the
project will be covered under a subsequent agreement or amendment
to this agreement.
The County will reimburse the city for costs not covered by the TIB
grant for that portion of the project lying within King County.
We recommend approval for Mayor to sign interagency agreement with
King County for the west leg of the 192nd/196th Corridor.
MAY 21, 1992
INTERAGENCY AGREEMENT FOR THE
SOUTH 196TH/200TH STREET PROJECT
This agreement is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF
KENT, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington,
hereinafter called the "City" and KING COUNTY, a governmental
subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter called the
"County" , for the purpose of performing design and environmental
documents for the South 196th/200th Street Corridor Arterial from
the intersection of Orillia Road and South 200th Street to State
Route 181 (West Valley Highway) , hereinafter called the "project. "
WHEREAS, the County and the City agree that a South 196th/200th
Street Corridor Arterial would provide a critical link in the
regional transportation system for the Soos Creek and Green River
Valley areas; and
WHEREAS, the need for this project has been recognized in the
County Transportation Plan, the Transportation Needs Report, the
Green River Transportation Action Plan, and the Soos Creek
Community Plan; and
WHEREAS, the new proposed corridor between State Routes 181 and
Orillia Road will serve residents of both the City and County; and
WHEREAS, the City has applied for and received Transportation
Improvement Board (TIB) funding for the South 196th/200th
Engineering Design and Right-of-Way Acquisition from Orillia Road
to State Route 181; and
WHEREAS, the City will be completing roadway design using City
personnel and also using private consulting firms to complete the
project design; and
WHEREAS, after design completion and the necessary permits are
secured the project will be put out to public bid for construction;
and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of all parties to establish a
lead agency to coordinate this project to provide for the design
and construction of the project;
NOW THEREFORE, the said parties hereby enter into an agreement as
follows :
1
I . SCOPE OF WORK
1. 1 The scope of work is to prepare engineering design plans
with consideration given to traffic patterns and needs,
topographic constraints, environmental impacts, and
costs. The product will be engineering drawings and
environmental documents for intersection improvements, a
new bridge crossing over the Green River and roadway
improvements between the intersection of Orillia Road and
200th Street and the intersection of SR 181 and South
196th Street.
The scope of work includes study of and engineering
design of improvements on Orillia Road northerly and
southerly of the intersection at 200th Street to
facilitate the planned arterial corridor improvement at
200th Street.
The next phase of the project which includes construction
of the intersection, roadway and bridge improvements,
together with construction inspection and management,
will be incorporated in a subsequent County/City
agreement or by amendment to this agreement.
II . TERMS AND CONDITIONS
2 . 1 Lead Agency - The City shall be the lead agency for the
project and shall be the lead agency with regard to SEPA
review, permitting, condemnations of land parcels
necessary to accomplish the road widening, and other
matters pertinent to accomplishment of the Scope of Work.
2 . 2 Engineering Consultants - The City shall be responsible
for the advertisement for and selection of engineering
and other design consultants necessary for the completion
of the engineering design, including but not limited to
structural engineers, environmental consultants, traffic
consultants, and geotechnical consultants to complete the
environmental documents, plans and specifications for the
project. The City shall utilize minority business
enterprise goals for consultants established by the
County for this project and shall follow processes
established by King County for this purpose.
2 . 3 Public Involvement - The City shall be responsible for
coordinating the public information and involvement
process and shall meet with the County to develop the
Public Involvement Plan. The County shall be given the
2
opportunity to attend and participate in any public
meetings.
2 . 4 Contact Persons - The parties to this agreement shall
appoint a contact person or persons to act as a liaison
for the project. These contact persons will meet on an
"as needed" basis to provide guidance for the project and
serve as a coordination body between the two agencies.
2 . 5 Acceptance - Final acceptance of the project shall be by
the City after review and approval by the County.
2 . 6 Schedule - The schedule for the project shall be
mutually agreed upon by the City and County.
Both the City and County understand that "time is of the
essence" and shall proceed without delay to avoid any
potential for loss of Transportation Improvement Board
funds.
III . COST REIMBURSEMENT AND FUNDING
3 . 1 Reimbursement of Cost - The County agrees to reimburse
the City for the costs not paid by the Transportation
Improvement Board for planning, preparation of
environmental documents, engineering, review, permit
fees, and right-of-way for that portion of the project
which lies within King County: The County portion
extends from the centerline of the Green River which is
the Kent Corporate City Limits westerly to Orillia Road.
The City shall provide the County a cost estimate at the
completion of the preliminary engineering phase.
The City shall bill the County and the County shall
reimburse the City on a monthly basis for actual expenses
incurred. The County' s share of the project shall not
exceed $60, 500 in 1992 . Costs in excess of this amount
shall require a subsequent County/City agreement or
amendment to this agreement.
IV. PROGRESS REPORTS AND CHANGE OF DESIGN
4 . 1 The City will at all times keep the County advised as to
the progress of said project, and shall, not order or
approve any changes in the approved project design which
substantially change the nature of said project without
first consulting the County.
3
V. NON-DISCRIMINATION
This Section V shall only apply to those persons and entities
hired, retained or otherwise employed by the City as a direct
result of the implementation of this agreement.
5 . 1 General
A. The word "City" as it appears in this section is
defined to be the City of Kent or any of its
contractors or subcontractors assigned to this
project.
B. During the performance of this contract, neither the
City nor any party subcontracting under authority of
this agreement shall discriminate on the basis of
race, color, sex, religion, national origin, creed,
marital status, sexual orientation, age, or the
presence of any sensory, mental or physical handicap
in employment or application for employment or in
the administration or delivery of services or any
other benefits under this agreement.
The City' s hiring practices pertaining to
engineering and other design consultants under this
agreement shall comply fully with King County Code,
Chapter 12 . 16 , and all applicable federal, state and
local laws, ordinances, executive orders and
regulations which prohibit such discrimination.
These laws include, but are not limited to RCW
49 . 60, Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Law of
1964 , Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 ,
Executive Order 11246 issued by the President of the
United States and Executive Order 2001-R issued by
the County Executive.
C. In the event of noncompliance by the City with any
of the non-discrimination provisions of this
agreement, the County shall have the right, at their
option, to cancel the contract, in whole or in part.
If the contract is canceled after partial
performance, the County' s obligation will be limited
to the fair market value or the contract price,
whichever is lower, for goods and services which
were received and approved prior to cancellation.
5 . 2 Employment
A. The Parties shall not discriminate against any
employee or applicant for employment due to race,
color, religion, creed, sex, sexual orientation,
age, national origin, marital status or the presence
4
of any sensory, mental or physical handicap in any
employment practice including, but not limited to,
hiring and firing, layoffs, upgrading, promotion or
transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising,
rates of pay or other forms of compensation,
training or any other term, condition or practice of
employment.
B. The Parties shall give notice of its
nondiscrimination policy and obligation in all
solicitations or advertisements for engineering and
other design consultants.
C. The Parties shall comply with all applicable
federal, state and local laws and regulations
regarding nondiscrimination in employment.
5 . 3 Program and Services
A. The Parties, or any subcontracting authority under
this agreement agrees not to discriminate on the
basis of race, color, religion, creed, sex, sexual
orientation, age, or the presence of any sensory,
mental or physical handicap in the access to, or in
the provision and administration of, any program or
activity under this contract.
"Discrimination" includes :
a) denial of services or benefits
b) segregated, separate, or different treatment
c) utilization of administrative criteria or methods
that have the effect of discriminatory treatment.
This obligation includes making programs and
services available and accessible to disabled
persons. Pertinent sections of King County Code,
Chapter 12 , 16 , the County' s Affirmative Action
Plan, the County ' s 504 Accessibility Plan and the
Americans Disability Act shall be followed.
5 . 4 Minority/Women ' s Business
The City shall fully comply with the requirements of King
County Code, Chapter 4 . 18 . Failure to do so shall be a
material breach of contract.
A. During the term of this contact the City shall:
a) Comply, as to tasks and proportionate dollar
amounts throughout the term of this contract, with
any plans made in its proposal for the use of
minority and/or women business enterprises (M/WBs) .
5
b) Adhere to the County' s substitution policy when a
M/WB for any reason becomes disassociated with the
contract.
B. King County in general, and the County' s M/WB
program in particular, are damaged when a contract
or a portion of a contract to be performed by a M/WB
is not actually performed by a M/WB in compliance
with King County Code, Chapter 4 . 18 . Because the
actual amount of such damage is not reasonably
calculable, the parties agree and stipulate that
liquidated damages of 100% of the value of the
utilization lost due to the violation, not to exceed
10% of the total dollar value of the contract, shall
be the amount required to compensate the local
jurisdictions and the County for resulting delays in
carrying out the purpose of the program, the costs
of meeting utilization goals through additional
contracts, the administrative costs of investigation
and enforcement and other damages and costs caused
by the violation.
VI . SEVERABILITY
6 . 1 If any covenant or provision in this agreement shall be
adjudged void, such adjudication shall not affect the
validity, obligation, or performance of any other
covenant or provision which in itself is valid, if such
remainder would then continue to conform with the terms
and requirements of applicable law and the intent of this
agreement.
VII . INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
7 . 1 Each party hereto agrees to indemnify and hold harmless
the other party, and its officers, agents and employees,
for all claims (including demands, suits, penalties,
losses, damages or costs of any kind whatsoever) to the
extent such a claim arises or is caused by the
indemnifying party ' s own negligence or that of its
officers, agents or employees in performance of this
agreement.
VIII . OTHER PROVISIONS
8 . 1 The City shall be deemed an independent contractor for
all purposes and the employees of the City or any of its
contractors, subcontractors and the employees shall not
6
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 3
or reduces the size of future additions. Metro is paying 56% of
the cost of this project. Wickstrom added we are recommending
award to Robison Construction. The Committee unanimously
recommended accepting the bid of Robison Construction.
Used oil Collection Event
Wickstrom stated we applied for a grant to hold two used motor oil
collection events. We have received grant approval paying for the
costs involved in holding the event with no match from the City.
Since the grant agreement will not be signed in time to hold the
first event in July, the Health Department has given us
authorization to expend funds prior to signing the actual
agreement. The initial costs would come from the Environmental
Fund which would be reimbursed by the grant. The Executive
Committee has approved this approach. It was explained that two
sites would be available on July 18 with one site being the city
shops area and the other the East Hill fire station on 116th.
Participants would be able to bring their used motor oil for
disposition. The Committee unanimously recommended adopting the
used oil collection grant funds that are made available and to
proceed with this project.
Dead Tree Short Plat
Wickstrom explained that a water extension and some street
improvements were constructed by the developer of the Dead Tree
Short. Those improvements are completed and the developer is now
asking for the City to accept same. The Committee unanimously
recommended approval to accept the improvements.
�► Interagency Agreement with King County - 196th/200th Corridor
Wickstrom stated this agreement is for the design of the west leg
of the 196th corridor from Orillia over to WVH. This is a joint
project with the County. The County is willing to pay their share
of the project from the middle of the river over to Orillia. We
have a TIB grant and street utility funds to pay the City's portion
of the project. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement
Wickstrom explained this is an interlocal agreement with the County
which enables us to secure State funding for the Commute Trip
Reduction Program we are required to implement. The City would be
eligible for approximately $130, 000 over a two year period. There
are approximately 64 businesses in Kent that exceed 100 employees.
N,
Kent City Council Meeting
j Date June 16. 1992
Category Consent Calendar
Ulu
1. SUBJECT: COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign interlocal
agreement with King County for the purpose of carrying out
certain provisions of the Commute Trip Reduction Act of 1991,
subject to approval of final form by the City Attorney.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, draft agreement and
excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L �(
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 28, 1992
TO: Public Works Comm'ttee
FROM: Don Wickstrom
0k)
SUBJECT: Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement
Since early this year, Transportation staff has been working with
King County Staff to develop an interlocal agreement in order to
secure State funding for the Commute Trip Reduction Program.
Attached is the latest draft of this agreement.
A final draft interlocal will be sent from King County on or about
June 15th. However, in order to insure that the entire City
Council has an opportunity to act on this interlocal by the end of
June, we are seeking Public Works Committee review and
recommendation at this time. Should the final interlocal agreement
contain substantive changes from the draft we will bring it before
you for further review. Additional information on the CTR program
and it's status will be presented a the Public Works Committee
meeting.
D
COMMUTE TRIP REDUCTION ACT INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
An interlocal agreement between King County (the
"County") , the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
("Metro") , and the City of ("City")
(hereinafter jointly referred to as the "Parties") for
the purpose of carrying out certain provisions of the
Commute Trip Reduction Act of 1991 (Chapter 202, 1991
Session Laws) .
WHEREAS, the Legislature enacted the Commute Trip Reduction Act (Chapter
202, 1991 Session Laws) to require local governments in those counties
experiencing the greatest automobile-related air pollution and traffic
congestion to develop and implement plans to reduce single occupant vehicle
commute trips;
WHEREAS, King County and the cities within King County having within
their boundaries one or more "major employer" are required to develop and
implement commute trip reduction plans;
WHEREAS, the local jurisdiction commute trip reduction plans are
required to be coordinated and consistent with plans of adjacent jurisdictions
and applicable regional plans ;
WHEREAS, the Legislature has appropriated funds to provide technical
assistance grants to local jurisdictions required to develop and implement
commute trip reduction plans; and pursuant to Chapter 202, 1991 Session Laws,
the Washington State Energy Office shall distribute these funds to counties,
which shall in turn distribute funds to those cities within the county in
proportion to the number of major employers and major worksites within each
city;
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants herein,
it is hereby agreed:
SECTION 1.0 PURPOSES
The purposes of this Agreement are: (1) to allocate to the City its
proportionate share of the state technical assistance grants for developing
and implementing a commute trip reduction plan; (2) to allocate a portion of
the technical assistance grants available to King County jurisdictions to
Metro in order to help finance certain start-up functions to be undertaken by
Metro on behalf of the County and the cities required to develop commute trip
reduction plans; and (3) to establish a cooperative approach among the City,
the County, and other jurisdictions in King County that are required to plan
and administer programs under the Commute Trip Reduction Act (the Act) in
order to address interjurisdictional issues and to meet the statutory
requirements for coordination and consistency among the jurisdictions'
respective commute trip reduction plans.
DRAFT 4/30/92 METRO/COUNTY/CITY CTR ILA Page 2
SECTION 2.0 DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall apply to this Agreement:
"Administrative Representative" means a person responsible for being the
central administrative contact for issues related to this Agreement as
designated in Section 2.3 of the Agreement.
"Commute Trip Reduction Plan (CTR Plan)" means a plan designed to achieve
reductions in the proportion of single occupant vehicle commute trips and the
vehicle miles traveled as described in Section 12, Chapter 202, Laws of 1991 .
"Commute Trip Reduction Program (CTR Program)" means a program designed by a
major employer to achieve reductions in the proportion of single occupant
vehicle commute trips and the commute trip vehicle miles traveled as described
in Section 13, Chapter 202, Laws of 1991 .
"CTR Grant Funds" means state funds authorized by Section 17, Chapter- 2O2,
Laws of 1991 , and Section 301 of the Natural Resources biennial budget to
assist counties and cities implementing commute trip reduction plans.
"Major Employer" means a private or public employer that employs one hundred
or more full -time employees at a single worksite who begin their regular
workday between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. on weekdays for at least twelve
continuous months during the year, as stipulated in the Act.
"Metro" means the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle.
"State" is the Washington State Energy Office (WSEO) unless otherwise noted.
SECTION 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK
3. 1 Scope of Work: The scope of work to be completed by the City, Metro and
the County in accordance with this Agreement is described in Exhibit A:
Statement of Work, which, by reference, is made a part of this
Agreement. Funds provided to the City and Metro under this Agreement
shall be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill the
requirements of the Commute Trip Reduction Act (Chapter 202, Washington
Laws of 1991) , as reflected in Exhibit A.
fNEW PARAGRAPH] The City and the County may enter into separate
agreements with Metro for CTR implementation services, under which Metro
would agree, to the extent allowed by law, to undertake the Centralized
CTR Implementation Services described in Exhibit C on behalf of the City
or the County. Metro will agree to provide the above referenced
services during the period ending September 30, 1993, on condition that
the contracting jurisdiction pay Metro an amount not to exceed ninety
percent (90%) of the contracting jurisdiction's allotment of CTR Grant
Funds for the current state biennium (ending June 30, 1993) , as set
forth in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement and reflected in Exhibit B.
DRAFT 4/30/92 METRO/COUNTY/CITY CTR ILA Page 3
[NEW PARAGRAPH - FOR SEATTLE AGREEMENT ONLYI The City agrees to use a
portion of its allotment of CTR Grant Funds to contract with Metro for
the six City of Seattle CTR Shared Work Products described in Exhibit D.
These work products will be made available to the County and any
interested city within the County at no cost.
3.2 Evaluation and Monitoring: The City and Metro shall cooperate with and
freely participate in any monitoring or evaluation activities conducted
by the County or the State that are pertinent to the intent of the Act,
with respect to those major employers within the boundaries of the City.
The State shall be solely responsible for determining satisfactory
performance of the Scope of Work by the City.
NEW PARAGRAPH] The County's role in monitoring the City is limited to
its functions as the State's fiscal agent in disbursing the CTR Grant
Funds, pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement, and as the State's
liaison with the City.
3.3 Administrative Representatives : The County, Metro and the City shall
each designate one person to be the central administrative contact for
matters pertaining to this Agreement and shall make such designation
known to each other in writing.
King County' s administrative representative shall be
Metro's administrative representative shall be
The City's administrative representative shall be
3.4 King County CTR Coordinating Committee: King County shall establish and
provide administrative support to a CTR Coordinating Committee. The
purposes of the committee shall be to (1) provide a forum for efforts to
coordinate the development of the CTR plans, (2) address issues related
to implementation of the CTR plans, and (3) address other transportation
demand management matters, as agreed by the committee. Members of the
committee shall include designated representatives from King County,
each of the cities receiving CTR grant funds, Metro, the Puget Sound
Regional Council , and other parties, as agreed by the committee.
SECTION 4.0 DISBURSEMENT OF CTR GRANT FUNDS.
4. 1 Amounts. The total amount of CTR Grant Funds to be allotted to the City
for the agreement period shall not exceed S , based on the method
described in Exhibit B: Methodology for Allocating CTR Grant Funds,
which by reference is made a part of this Agreement. [PROVIDED THAT
Metro uses its d4reet allotment to undertake the three start up
DRAFT 4/30/92 METRO/COUNTY/CITY CTR ILA Page 4
Services deSEribed in Exhibit G (Potential Centralized GTR
FURTHER THAT Metro agrees, to the extent allowed by law,- te under takee
of Seattle will make- ayailable to the other Parties; AND PROVIDED
!993) an behalf of th unty or any
aof the i
jurisdiction'sallatment of CTR grant funds under this Agreeffient.
if these preyi -4 ens are fiat Riet -by , ,
FRay defer flsri�;;�-isbursefflents of CTR grant funds until SUEh time that
[NEW PARAGRAPHI The total amount of CTR Grant Funds to be allotted
directly to Metro under this agreement shall not exceed one hundred and
thirty-four thousand dollars ($134,000) , as payment for three CTR start-
up tasks Metro agrees to perform on behalf of all affected jurisdictions
in King County. Metro agrees to contribute fifty thousand dollars
($50,000) in in-kind services to perform the three start-up tasks, which
are described in Exhibit A. Metro agrees to use its best efforts to
complete the three start-up tasks by December 31, 1992.
4.2 Disbursement of Funds. The City shall submit an invoice voucher and a
quarterly progress report to the County by no later than the fifteenth
tenth day of each quarter. Within [fifteen (15 a twenty (20) days of
receiving an invoice voucher from the City, the County shall remit to
the City a warrant for an amount equal to one eighth (to the nearest
dollar) of the total allotment to the City under this agreement, with
the exception of the first disbursement, which shall be for an amount
equal to three eighths of the total allotment; PROVIDED THAT the
Washington State Energy Office (WSEO) has made a timely disbursement of
funds to the County pursuant to the intergovernmental agreement between
WSEO and the County.
[NEW PARAGRAPH] Metro shall submit an invoice voucher and a quarterly
progress report to the County by the following dates for the amounts
indicated:
Invoice Due Date Amount
June 15, 1992 $50,250
July 10, 1992 $33,500
October 9, 1992 $33,500
January 8, 1993 $16,750
The quarterly progress reports shall describe Metro's progress in
completing the three countywide start-up tasks set forth in Exhibit C
and shall report on any agreements Metro has reached with interested
jurisdictions for the provision of the CTR implementation activities
described in Exhibit C.
f
GRAFT 4/30/92 METRO/COUNTY/CITY CTR ILA Page 5
SECTION 5.0 REPORTING.
5.1 Quarterly Reports. When requesting payment each quarter, the City jor
its designee) shall submit a brief progress report with the County
indicating the CTR plan development and implementation activities
undertaken during the past quarter and those scheduled for the current
quarter, with the exception of the first progress report submitted under
this Agreement, which shall describe the CTR activities undertaken by
the City since July 1 , 1991 . The County shall -forward the City's
quarterly progress reports to the State.
5.2 Special Reports. By no later than April 15, 1993, the City (or its
designee) shall submit the following special reports to the County:
5.2.1 CTR Plan Summary: This report shall include a copy of the city's
ordinance adopting the CTR Plan, as well as a description of the city's
CTR Program for its employees .
5.2.2 CTR Zone Report: This report shall i.nclude, at a minimum, the
following: (a) a map showing CTR zone boundaries within the city; and
(b) a list of CTR zones, indicating an identifying title, and the
preliminary base year values of the proportion of single occupancy
vehicles and vehicle miles traveled for each zone.
5.2.3 Parking Policy Report: This report shall include a summary of
the city's existing parking policies and ordinances, as well as a status
report on the city's parking policy review (as required by the CTR Act) .
5.3 Auditing of Records, Documents, and Reports . The County or the State
Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full access to and
the right to examine during normal business hours and as often as the
County or the State Auditor may deem necessary, all the records of the
City and Metro with respect to all matters covered in this Agreement.
Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, and make
excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all
contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and records of matters covered
by this Agreement. Such rights last for three (3) years from the date
final payment is made hereunder.
SECTION 6.0 [RECAPTURE PROVISION. in the eyent that [the Gity er Metro]
fails to expend the CTR Grant Funds in aeeardanee with state law and/er t
P-19,015i.e.-Is of th4s Agreement, the County reser,ves the right to recapture funds
reeapture shall 2xist for a period not to e)(Eeed three (3) years fe!!GY4�
termination ef this agreement. Repayment by [the City er Metrej ef funds
der this reeapture previS-jA—R:7 + + that the County �
required
+ institute legal ed +e
ereeff
BRAFT 4/30/92 METRO/COUNTY/CITY CTR ILA Page 6
NONCOMPLIANCE In the event the State determines that the City has failed to
expend the CTR Grant Funds in accordance with state law and requests the
County's assistance in resolving the matter, the County reserves the right to
withhold further allocations to the City until the State notifies the County
that the matter is resolved.
SECTION 7.0 REDUCTION IN FUNDS. [The GE)upty may unilaterallyterffl4nateall
or part of this th4s a,,. eeRi +] +If there� is a reduction of CTR Grant Funds by the State, and
if such funds are the basis of this Agreement, the County Metro and the City
may reduce their respective scopes of work or budgets under this agreement.
SECTION 8.0 NONDISCRIMINATION. There shall be no discrimination against any
employee who is paid by the CTR state assistance funds or against any
applicant for such employment because of race, religion, color, sex, marital
status, creed, national origin, age, Vietnam era/disabled veterans status, or
the presence of any sensory, mental , or physical handicap. This provision
shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading,
demotion, transfer, recruitment, advertising, layoff or termination, rates of
pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training.
SECTION 9.0 WAIVER OF DEFAULT. Waiver of any default shall not be deemed to
be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any provision of
the agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent
breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of the
agreement unless stated to be such in writing, signed by an authorized
representatives of the County, and attached to the original agreement.
SECTION 10.0 SEVERABILITY. In the event any term or condition of the
Agreement or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held
invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other terms, condition or
application. To this end the terms and conditions of this agreement are
declared severable.
SECTION 11.0 INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. [Eac=h Party shall defend,
suits and/or aEtiGAS arising from aRy neyligent ar pretee t, and hold harmless the other Parties from and against all ela4msF
perferming the werk pursuant to this AgreeFnent . if a Party enters into ai+y
Claims 5hal-1 inelude,but net be limited to, assertions that the use er
transfer of nay seftware, bE)oi(, deeYment, report, -fllffi, tape, Or SEHAd
kind,repreduetien or rflater4al of an), deliYered hereunder,
results in an unfair trail. praetiee7]
11. 1 It is understood and agreed that this agreement is solely for the
benefit of the parties hereto and gives no right to any other party. No
joint venture or partnership is formed as a result of this agreement.
each party hereto agrees to be responsible and assumes liability for its
GRAFT 4/30/92 METRO/COUNTY/CITY CTR ILA Page 7
own negligent acts or omissions or those of its officers agents or
employees to the fullest extent required by law, and agrees to save,
indemnify, defend and hold the other parties harmless from any such
liability. In the case of negligence of multiple parties, any damages
allowed shall be levied in proportion to the percentage of negligence
attributable to each party, and each party shall have the right to seek
contribution from the other parties in proportion to the percentage of
negligence attributable to the other parties .
11.2 This indemnification clause shall also apply to any and all cases of
action arisinq out of performance of work activities under this
agreement Each contract for services or activities utilizing funds
provided in whole or in part by this agreement shall include a provision
that the State is not liable for damage or claims from damages arisinq
from any subcontractor's performance or activities under the terms of
the contracts.
SECTION 12.0 AGREEMENT PERIOD. This Agreement shall become effective upon
signature by Parties to this Agreement. The termination date shall be
September 30, 1993, or earlier upon written agreement by the County Executive
and an authorized representative of the City and Metro. Termination of this
agreement does not relieve any of the Parties of any obligations incurred as a
result of this Agreement.
SECTION 13.0 AGREEMENT MODIFICATIONS. This agreement may be amended,
altered, clarified or extended only by written agreement of the County
Executive and an authorized representative of the City and Metro.
SECTION 14.0 TERMINATION. [Netwithstanding any pre','isiens of this.
Agreement, if threugh any Eause r,-,., Gity or Met-re] shall r
Gity er Metro] shall 3aielate any of its ail to fulfill
Agreement and withhold the remaining alleeation ef funds if sueh default or
,,,ielatien is net eerrected within twent)' (20) days after submitting, iWitten
of this Agreement, the GE)unty shall ther-eupen have the right te terffl Hate. this
14. 1 Any party to this agreement may terminate the agreement with cause, in
whole or in part upon thirty (30) days advance written notice of the
termination to the other parties.
14.2 If at any time during the agreement period the State acts to terminate,
reduce modify, or withhold the CTR Grant Funds allotted to the County,
or those portions of the Countywide allotment allocated to the City or
Metro then the County may terminate this agreement upon giving thirty
(30) days written notice to the other parties. The County, as the
State's fiscal agent shall have the authority and responsibility to
ensure that upon termination of this agreement any remaining CTR Grant
Funds are made available to the parties in the manner described in
Section 4.2 of this agreement or returned to the State.
BRAFT 4/30/92 METRO/COUNTY/CITY CTR ILA Page 8
Dated this day of 1992.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the
day first above mentioned.
Approved as to form: CITY OF
By By
Assistant City Attorney Title
Approved as to form: KING COUNTY:
By By
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney King County Executive
EXHIBIT A: Statement of Work
EXHIBIT B: Methodology for Allocating CTR Grant Funds
EXHIBIT C: Metro Centralized CTR Implementation Services
EXHIBIT D: City of Seattle CTR Shared Work Products (included only in
Seattle's agreement)
D � a
EX1rIIBTT A: STATEMENT OF WORK
aft
Development and Implementation of
Commute Trip Reduction Plans and Programs
BACKGROUND: The 1991 Legislature found that automobile traffic in Washington's
metropolitan areas is the major source of emissions of air contaminants and that
increasing automobile traffic is aggravating traffic congestion. Further, the 1991
Legislature found that increasing automobile traffic is a major factor in increasing
consumption of gasoline. According to the legislature, reducing the number of
commute trips to work via single occupant vehicles is an effective way of reducing
vehicle-related air pollution, traffic congestion and energy use.
To address these problems, Second Substitute House Bill (SSHB) 1671 was passed by
the 1991 Legislature and signed by the Governor. SSHB 1671 requires cities, counties
and towns containing "major employers" in the counties (Clark, King, Kitsap, Pierce,
Snohomish, Spokane, Thurston, and Yakima) experiencing the greatest vehicle-related
air pollution, gasoline consumption and congestion problems to develop plans and
programs to reduce single occupant vehicle commute trips.
These counties, cities and towns are to establish and implement commute trip reduction
plans for all major employers within their jurisdiction. The commute trip reduction
plans are to be developed in cooperation with local transit agencies, regional
transportation planning organizations and major employers. They are to be consistent
with and can be incorporated in state or regional transportation plans and local
comprehensive plans. Additionally, the trip reduction plans are to be consistent.with
the guidelines established by the Commute Trip Reduction Task Force.
The Commute Trip Reduction program will be developed in phases. Phase I (July 1,
1991 to June 30, 1993), the period of this agreement covers the initial period of local
plan implementation. During Phase 1, cities and counties will pass ordinances, program
staff will identify and make contacts with major employers, and staff will establish
commute trip reduction zones and generate zone base year values and progress year
goals. A separate Phase Il contract will be negotiated after the thud quarter Fiscal
Year 1993 when the revenue is confirmed by the legislature. Phase II (July 1, 1993 to
June 30, 1995) will involve ongoing program administration, including, but not limited
to: employer initial program descriptions (1993), employer annual reports (1994, 1995),
and employee survey results, where and when available.
JB/dskt.ab/t1009
OBJECTIVES: King County, acting as a fiscal agent for the State, will coordinate and
administer within King County distribution of the State grant funds available to local
governments required to develop and implement the State's Commute Trip Reduction
legislation. Pursuant to this interlocal agreement, King County will provide funds to
cities within the county which are implementing commute trip reduction plans. Funds
provided under this agreement are to be used solely for activities undertaken to fulfill
the requirements of SSHB 1671, Transportation Demand Management. King County
will be a liaison between the Washington State Energy Office (WSEO) and cities within
the county for the purpose of implementing SSHB 1671.
COUNTY AND CITY TASKS:
1. Adopt by ordinance and implement a commute trip reduction plan for major
employers within the jurisdictions' respective boundaries, according to the
provisions of SSHB 1671.
1.1 Set goals for reductions in the proportion of single occupant vehicle
commute trips and commute trip vehicle miles traveled per employee.
1.2 Designate commute trip reduction zones.
1.3 Set requirements for major public and private sector employers to
implement commute trip reduction programs.
1.4 Develop a commute trip reduction plan. Submit one final copy of plan
to WSEO.
1.5 Review parking policies and ordinances as they relate to employers and
major work sites and make revisions necessary to comply with commute
trip reduction goals and guidelines.
1.6 Establish an appeals process by which major employers, who as a result
of special characteristics of their business or its location would be unable
to meet the requirements of a commute trip reduction plan, may obtain
waiver or modification of those requirements complyisng with commute
trip reduction guidelines.
1.7 Set means for determining base year values of the proportion of single
occupant vehicle commute trips and the commute trip vehicle miles
traveled per employee and the progress toward meeting commute trip
reduction plan goals on an annual basis. For counties conducting surveys
to establish base year values and goals, submit data base of survey
results.
JB/dsklab/t1009
1.8 Ensure the commute trip reduction plan is consistent with the guidelines
and requirements of SSHB 1671.
1.9 Ensure the commute trip reduction plan is consistent with applicable
state or regional transportation plans and local comprehensive plans.
1.10 Ensure the commute trip reduction plan is consistent with the commute
trip reduction plans of counties, cities or towns with common borders or
related regional issues.
2. Provide commute trip reduction data and information consistent with the
requirements of using database software or ASCii provided by WSEO.
2.1 Provide the information needed to produce a county-wide report to the
WSEO which includes:
a. Each jurisdiction's contact person's name, mailing address and
phone number
b. Total number of commute trip reduction zones (CTR zones)
c. Preliminary Single Occupancy Vehicle and Vehicle Miles Traveled
values for each CTR zone
d. List of CTR zone
e. Map showing CTR zone boundaries of the county
3. Submit Quarterly Progress Reports summarizing CTR events within the
jurisdiction and a list of scheduled CTR events in the upcoming quarter.
METRO TASKS:
1. Identify affected "major employer" worksites and maintain data base (see
attached scope of work).
2. Design an employer assistance program and produce "self-help kits" (see
attached scope of work).
3. Develop a system to monitor and evaluate CTR Plan implementation (see
attached scope of work).
JB/dskiab/0009
EXHIBIT B
METHODOLOGY FOR ALLOCATING CTR GRANT FUNDS
The CTR Act states that the WSEO shall distribute the CTR Grant
Funds to the eight counties covered by the Act "in proportion to
the number of major employers and major worksites in each
county; " and the statute requires the counties to distribute the
funds to cities "in proportion to the number of major employers
and major worksites within the city. "
A "major employer, " as defined by the Act, is a public or private
employer that employs one hundred or more full-time employees at
a single worksite who begin their regular work day between 6 : 00
a.m. and 9 : 00 a.m. on weekdays for at least twelve continuous
months during the year. "Major worksite, " as defined by the Act
means a building or a group of buildings that are on physically
contiguous parcels of land or on parcels separate solely by
private or public roadways or rights of way, and at which there
are one hundred or more full-time employees of one or more
employers, who begin their work day between 6 : 00 a .m. and 9 : 00
a .m. on weekdays for at least twelve continuous months .
A complicating factor in agreeing upon a methodology for
distributing the CTR Grant Funds within King County has been the
lack of reliable data on the geographic distribution of "major
employers and major worksites . " The best data available at this
time is the Washington State Employment Security Department ' s
estimated count of employers with employment sites of over 100
full-time employees, by jurisdiction, showing a total of 1, 278
such employment sites in King County.
The methodology for allocating the CTR Grant Funds in King County
is a proportional distribution, based on Employment Security ' s
June 1991 estimate of the distribution of potential major
employers within King County, with the following adjustments:
o An "off-the-top" allocation of $134 , 000 for three countywide
start-up functions to be provided by Metro on behalf of all
jurisdictions, as reflected in Exhibit A;
o No allocations to small cities on the Employment Security
list where County staff have determined that no major
employers are located -- only Carnation and North Bend are
in this category; and
o Adjust the Employment Security list to add Sea-Tac, assuming
that five of the major employers that would otherwise be
assigned to the unincorporated area are located in Sea-Tac,
based on information from the SeaTac Planning Department.
The resulting distribution of CTR Grants Funds is summarized in
the table on the following page .
Page 2 EXHIBIT B
DISTRIBUTION OF CTR GRANT FUNDS WITHIN KING COUNTY
MAJOR % FY 1992/93 1
JURISDICTION EMPLOYERS SHARE CTR GRANT FUNDS
------------------------------------ ---------------
ALGONA 2 0. 2% 4 , 080
AUBURN 30 2 . 3% 61, 197
BELLEVUE 119 9 . 3% 242 , 749
BOTHELL 16 1 . 3% 32 , 638
DES MOINES 5 0 . 4% 10, 200
ENUMCLAW 5 0. 4% 10 , 200
FEDERAL WAY 38 3 . 0% 77 , 516
ISSAQUAH 12 0 . 9% 24 , 479
KENT 64 5 . 0% 130 , 554
KIRKLAND 31 2 . 4% 631237
MERCER ISLAND 7 0 . 5% 14 , 279
REDMOND 54 4 . 2% 110, 155
RENTON 48 3 . 8% 97 , 915
SEATAC 5 0 . 4% 101200
SEATTLE 745 58 . 3% 1 , 519 , 730
SNOQUALMIE 1 0 . 1% 21040
TUKWILA 30 2 . 3% 61, 197
UNINCORPORATED 66 5 . 2% 134 , 634
METRO N/A 0 . 0% 134 , 000
-----------------------------------
1 , 278 100 . 0% 2 , 741, 000
'This allocation reflects a proportionate share of major employers'
worksites, as indicated by Employment Security Department data, with the
exception of the $134,000 off-the-top allocation to Metro for start-up
activities.
D
EXHIBIT C
METRO CENTRALIZED CTR IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES
BACKGROUND: As a result of the discussions among staff from
Metro and King County jurisdictions required to develop CTR
ordinances, Metro has developed a proposal for centralized CTR
implementation services. Subject to reaching agreement on the
terms of a separate contract as described in Paragraph 3 of this
agreement, Metro is willing to offer the following Centralized
CTR Implementation Services to the City and/or the County through
September 30, 1993 :
o Identification and notification of affected employers;
o Assisting affected employers in the development of CTR
programs suitable to their individual circumstances;
o Loading and maintenance of the enhanced database for the
affected employers;
o Implementation of an approved Employer Recognition Program
and Administrative Issues Resolution processes; and
o review of affected employers ' CTR Programs .
jb/ctrex-c
r
EXHIBIT D
CITY OF SEATTLE SHARED CTR WORK PRODUCTS
BACKGROUND: King County and seventeen cities within the county
are required to develop and implement Commute Trip Reduction
(CTR) ordinances, pursuant to the CTR Act, enacted by the
Legislature in 1991. In the draft guidelines issued by the State
CTR Task Force, local governments are urged to arrange for a
centralized administration of CTR implementation tasks -- through
interlocal agreements or other mechanisms -- in order to meet the
statutory goals for consistency among the CTR plans of
neighboring jurisdictions and to make efficient use of resources.
Within King County, there have been discussions among staff of
the affected jurisdictions since July 1991 about the possibility
of the jurisdictions contracting with Metro for centralized CTR
implementation services. The City of Seattle, in particular, has
been engaged in negotiating with Metro for contracted CTR
implementation services.
Subject to the terms of an agreement to be negotiated between
Metro and the City of Seattle for the development of certain CTR
work products, the City of Seattle will share the following
products with other cities and the County, at no cost, to assist
them in implementing their respective CTR plans .
The City of Seattle recognizes that regional cooperation and .
consistency are important to the implementation and
administration of the CTR Act. The City of Seattle believes that
its contribution of these Shared CTR Work Products will reduce
duplication of services and make more efficient use of public
funds. It intends to work in partnership with the State, County,
other cities and transit agencies to reduce traffic congestion,
improve air quality and increase energy efficiency. The City of
Seattle ' s actions are consistent with its Comprehensive Plan
Framework Policies and supportive of regional Growth Management
Act implementation efforts .
Work Product 1 - Employer Assistance Program
The City of Seattle will make available a copy of its
refined employer assistance plan, technical assistance
strategies, workshop strategies, materials design and
estimated budget. Local jurisdictions will be responsible
for production costs of their own employer assistance
programs for major employers . Such costs include, but may
not be limited to, materials, workshops, technical
assistance and staffing.
Page 2 D EXHIBIT D
Work Product 2 - Employer Notification Procedures
The City of Seattle will make available a description of its
refined employer notification process and procedures; copies
of its design of associated letters, forms and materials;
and its estimated budget. Local jurisdictions will be
responsible for production costs associated with the
notification of the major employers in their respective
jurisdictions .
Work Product 3 - Database Expansion
The City of Seattle will make available a description of its
CTR database design to support employer transactions,
including programming information and operating procedures.
Each local jurisdiction will be responsible for developing
its own database associated with the major employers in its
jurisdiction.
Work Product 4 - CTR Program Review Procedures
The City of Seattle will make available a description of its
CTR program review procedures, criteria, schedule and
budget. Each local jurisdiction will be responsible for
developing its own procedures and budget associated with
reviewing the CTR programs submitted by the major employers
in its jurisdiction, including labor and materials
production.
Work Product 5 - Administrative Issues Process
The City of Seattle will make available a description of its
administrative issues resolution process . Local
jurisdictions will be responsible for adapting the process .
to their own unique governance structures and other local
requirements .
Work Product 6 - Ordinance Review
The City of Seattle will make available the comments and
observations made by Metro on the City ' s draft ordinance
during the development and review stage.
jh/ctrex-d
Public Works Committee
June 3, 1992
Page 3
or reduces the size of future additions. Metro is paying 56% of
the cost of this project. Wickstrom added we are recommending
award to Robison Construction. The Committee unanimously
recommended accepting the bid of Robison Construction.
Used Oil Collection Event
Wickstrom stated we applied for a grant to hold two used motor oil
collection events. We have received grant approval paying for the
costs involved in holding the event with no match from the City.
Since the grant agreement will not be signed in time to hold the
first event in July, the Health Department has given us
authorization to expend funds prior to signing the actual
agreement. The initial costs would come from the Environmental
Fund which would be reimbursed by the grant. The Executive
Committee has approved this approach. It was explained that two
sites would be available on July 18 with one site being the city
shops area and the other the East Hill fire station on 116th.
Participants would be able to bring their used motor oil for
disposition. The Committee unanimously recommended adopting the
used oil collection grant funds that are made available and to
proceed with this project.
Dead Tree Short Plat
Wickstrom explained that a water extension and some street
improvements were constructed by the developer of the Dead Tree
Short. Those improvements are completed and the developer is now
asking for the City to accept same. The Committee unanimously
recommended approval to accept the improvements.
Interagency Agreement with King County - 196th/200th Corridor
Wickstrom stated this agreement is for the design of the west leg
of the 196th corridor from Orillia over to WVH. This is a joint '
project with the County. The County is willing to pay their share
of the project from the middle of the river over to Orillia. We
have a TIB grant and street utility funds to pay the City's portion
of the project. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Commute Trio Reduction Interlocal Agreement
Wickstrom explained this is an interlocal agreement with the County
which enables us to secure State funding for the Commute Trip
Reduction Program we are required to implement. The City would be
eligible for approximately $130,000 over a two year period. There
are approximately 64 businesses in Kent that exceed 100 employees.
Jim White confirmed that the Chamber has reviewed this. Jim
Bennett asked about staffing for the program. Wickstrom explained
that we have a consultant who is developing the program. Tom
Brubaker brought to the committee's attention that they have a
draft of the agreement. We should be receiving the final form
before the June 16 Council meeting. In order to meet the required
time frame for signature, he asked for authority to make any minor
modifications that may be required with the understanding that if
any substantial changes are required we will bring it back before
the Committee. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
signature of the Commute Trip Reduction Plan interlocal agreement
upon approval of the final form by the City Attorney.
Central Avenue Improvement (Lowe to Titus) TIB Grant
Wickstrom stated we have received a construction grant from the
Transportation Improvement Board for the improvement of Central
between Gowe and Titus. This is a one-block widening nrniPrt which
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16, 1992
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CENTRAL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (GOWE TO TITUS) TIB
GRANT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, authorization for the Mayor to sign agreement with
WSDOT for a TIB Construction Grant in the amount of $437, 520
for the Central Avenue Improvement project and establishment of
the budget for same.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, letter from TIB and
excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: RecommendedAi RMh Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ \
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3M X
MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
S•-'-ject: CENTRAL AVENUE TIB GRANT - FISCAL NOTE
C__ztor: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 02/04/91 at 1717 .
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING COUNCIL ACCEPTANCE OF A
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT BOARD GRANT TO IMPROVE CENTRAL AVENUE FROM
GOWE STREET TO TITUS STREET. THE PROJECT HAS BEEN IN THE WORKS SINCE
JUNE, 1989 WHEN COUNCIL AUTHORIZED THE GRANT APPLICATION. WORD OF THE
GRANT AWARD WAS RECEIVED ON JANUARY 25, 1991 AND MUST BE ACCEPTED BY
FEBRUARY 8TH. CITY MATCHING FUNDS WILL COME FROM DRAINAGE UTILITY
FUNDS, WSDOT OVERLAY FUNDS WITH MINOR AMOUNTS FROM OTHER COMPLETED
STREET PROJECT FUNDS. THE PROJECT HAS BEEN SCOPED DOWN FROM WHAT WAS
DISCUSSED IN 1989 AND THEREFORE DOES NOT REQUIRE ADDITIONAL CIP FUNDS.
WITH NO ADDITIONAL CITY COMMITTMENTS, THE IBC RECOMMENDS THE ACCEPTANCE
OF TIB GRANT.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 28, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS CO" TEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM M)
RE: CENTRAL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (GOWE TO TITUS) TIB GRANT
We have received notice from the Transportation Improvement Board
that they have authorized $437, 520 for the construction phase of
this project.
We are recommending the grant be accepted and that the Mayor be
authorized to sign the grant agreement.
- State of Washington
�� Transportation Improvement Board CITYOFN'T
I rransporlation Building KF-01 MA 9 F 19 y
Olympia. Washington 98504
(206)753-7198 SCAN234-7198 ENCiIIyCC�Il�ili lid '(
May 26, 1992
Mr. Don Wickstrom, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Kent
220 4th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Transportation Improvement Project
TIB No. 8-1-106(22)
Central Avenue
Gowe Street to Titus Street
City of Kent
Dear Mr. Wickstrom:
We are pleased to advise you that the Transportation Improvement Board has authorized
financial assistance for the construction phase of the subject project. Urban Arterial Trust
Account (UATA) funds approved for the design phase were $129,280. The amount
authorized for the construction phase is $437,520. Your request for an increase of $49,280
was approved providing a total of $566,800 in UATA funds. The effective date of this
authorization is May 21, 1992, and reimbursable work for the construction phase may now
begin.
The next steps in proceeding with your project are listed below:
1. Sign both copies of the Project Agreement for Construction and return them to the
TIB office by June 12, 1992.
2. In accordance with TIB rules, an Updated Cost Estimate form (TIB Form 190-015)
is required when you are considering contract bids but prior to contract execution.
When you receive verbal or written concurrence from the TIB staff, you may award
the contract.
If you have questions, contact the TIB office in Olympia at (206)586-8714 or (206)586-1291.
Sincerely,
John M. Tevis, P.E.
UATA Program Engineer
JMT:gjb
Enclosures
cc: Terry Paananen
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 4
Jim White confirmed that the Chamber has reviewed this. Jim
Bennett asked about staffing for the program. Wickstrom explained
that we have a consultant who is developing the program. Tom
Brubaker brought to the committee's attention that they have a
draft of the agreement. We should be receiving the final form
before the June 16 council meeting. In order to meet the required
time frame for signature, he asked for authority to make any minor
modifications that may be required with the understanding that if
any substantial changes are required we will bring it back before
the Committee. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
signature of the Commute Trip Reduction Plan interlocal agreement
upon approval of the final form by the City Attorney.
�► Central Avenue Improvement (Gowe to Titus) TIB Grant
Wickstrom stated we have received a construction grant from the
Transportation Improvement Board for the improvement of Central
between Gowe and Titus. This is a one-block widening project which
adds a right turn lane at Gowe and Titus as well an overlay from
Willis to Smith Street. The Committee unanimously recommended
approval to accept the grant and authorization for the Mayor to
sign.
Cornucopia Days Ordinance
This ordinance is similar to what has been adopted in previous
years authorizing street closure for Cornucopia Days. The
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance.
Ed White asked if there were another way to effect these street
closures for the various festivals without going to Public Works
and Council each year. It was determined that adopting the
ordinances each year is the best way. Jim Bennett commented about
possibly finding another site for the Balloon Classic so revenue is
not taken from a revenue producing facility.
Canyon Drive Barrier
Jim White stated he had been contacted by a number of citizens as
to why we did not install the jersey barriers further up Canyon.
He asked staff to look into the costs and possibility of installing
additional barriers further east on Canyon possibly up to 101st by
the high school. Wickstrom stated we could look at the project for
inclusion in the six year street program. Tom Brubaker added there
would possibly be condemnation issues to address and should be
considered as part of the costs.
1 Kent City Council Meeting
ry fU Date June 16 , 1992
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: USED MOTOR OIL COLLECTION EVENTS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, authorization for staff to accept the grant from the
Local Grants Program of the Local Hazardous Waste Management
Program for Seattle/King County and to proceed with the used
motor oil collection events.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, fiscal note, letter
from Health Department and event proposal
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended /fiVA Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3N x
MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
Suhject: USED OIL COLLECTION EVENT - FISCAL NOTE
C. itor: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 06/02/92 at 1434 .
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF A $9,717 GRANT FROM
THE SEATTLE KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO FUND A USED OIL COLLECTION EVENT.
THE GRANT WILL COVER 100% OF THE COST THE EVENT WHICH INCLUDES THE COST OF AN
OUTSIDE COLLECTION CONTRACTOR, APPROPRIATE PROMOTION AND CITY STAFFING COSTS.
THE ONLY HITCH IS THAT THE CITY WILL HAVE TO UP FRONT THE COST FROM THE
ENVIORMENTAL FUND UNTIL THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT CAN
BE FINALIZED.
SINCE THE PROJECT IS 100% GRANT FUNDED, THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
GRANT ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 27, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM S�O
RE: USED OIL COLLECTION
In December of 1991, we became aware of grant funds that would be
available to Kent in 1992 for hazardous waste programs. This grant
does not require matching funds from the City and provides a 100%
reimbursement up to $9 , 717 . So as not to miss out on the
opportunity of the grant funds, an outline was developed for an oil
collection event and a grant application submitted.
We have been advised that our application has been approved and we
have been given authorization to proceed with the project. While
it is unlikely we will have an interlocal agreement with the Health
Department developed and signed prior to our planned event, the
Health Department has committed to fulfill its obligation for
reimbursement of costs up to $9 , 717 (see attached) .
We are recommending that we proceed with the oil collection event
in July (rather than June as originally proposed) with the costs
for same paid from the Environmental Fund with reimbursement to
that fund coming from the grant. The Executive Committee has
concurred with this recommendation.
14 D& (S)
C.it* of Seattle Kind!Couot�
rn
No .a,.It, Itive,Mupur Ti...I lit 1,Exe,aril
Seattle-King County Departuseut of Public 11e.1101
David Al. Lu rice Dii-eclor
May 7 , 1992
Karen Siegel
Administrative Assistant
City of Kent
220 - 4th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Dear Ms. Siegel:
I have reviewed your proposed 1992 Local Grant Project. The oil
collection events that the City of Kent is planning are within the
scope of programs funded through the Local Grants program of the
Local Hazardous Waste Management Program for Seattle-King County.
The Health Department is currently processing the interlocal
agreement between the City of Kent and the Seattle-King County
Department of Public Health that will allow the City of Kent to
proceed in implementing these collection events.
The contracting process is lengthy, and I don't feel that we will
be able to have the signed interlocal agreement prior to your first
event on June 20, 1992 . This interlocal will need to be signed by
both parties before the Health Department is authorized to
reimburse the City of Kent for the collection events. However,
please accept this letter as a commitment on the part of the
Seattle-King County Department of Public Health to fulfill its
obligation for reimbursement of costs up to $9, 717 to the City of
Kent for these collection events prior to formal acceptance of the
interlocal agreement by both parties.
If you have any questions concerning this process please feel free
to contact me at 296-3988 . Thank you.
Sincerely,
Todd W. Yerk s
Environmental Health Services Supervisor
Local Hazardous Waste Program
B: <WP-LHWMP-GRANTS>LOCALKEN
Environmental Health Division Room 201 Smith Tower Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)296.4722
"Printed on Recycled Paper"
Message. Dated: 06/02/92 at 1451.
Subject: USED OIL COLLECTION EVENT
c^nder: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Contents: 3 .
Karen SIEGEL / KENT70/PW
Part 1.
TO: Karen SIEGEL / KENT70/PW
Don WICKSTROM / KENT70/PW
Part 2.
A FISCAL NOTE FOR YOUR COMMITTEE MEETING TOMORROW.
Part 3.
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING ACCEPTANCE OF A $9,717 GRANT FROM
THE SEATTLE KING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO FUND A USED OIL COLLECTION EVENT.
THE GRANT WILL COVER 100% OF THE COST THE EVENT WHICH INCLUDES THE COST OF AN
OUTSIDE COLLECTION CONTRACTOR, APPROPRIATE PROMOTION AND CITY STAFFING COSTS.
THE ONLY HITCH IS THAT THE CITY WILL HAVE TO UP FRONT THE COST FROM THE
ENVIORMENTAL FUND UNTIL THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT CAN
BE FINALIZED.
SINCE THE PROJECT IS 100% GRANT FUNDED, THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS
GRANT ACCEPTANCE AND APPROVAL OF THE BUDGET.
PROPOSED
CITY OF KENT
USED MOTOR OIL COLLECTION EVENTS
The City of Kent is proposing to hold two special used motor oil
collection events, one approximately June 20, 1992 and another in
February, 1993 . Used oil filters will also be collected at each of
the events. Three sites will be made available to the public
between the hours of 9 : 00 a.m. and 4 : 00 p.m. on each of those
dates. The sites will be City of Kent Fire Stations, one at 24611
116th Avenue S.E. , one at 26512 Military Road South and the third
at 20676 72nd Avenue South, thus making the oil collection events
readily available to citizens on the east and west hills of Kent as
well as the valley floor.
In January, 1992 , a request for proposals based upon the above
information was sent to three companies known to have experience in
used motor oil collection. A copy of that RFP is attached. The
following cost projections for the proposed program are based upon
the response (and only response) submitted by Burlington
Environmental. Since Burlington Environmental operates the
Household Hazardous Wastemobile for King County Solid Waste, we
felt their response and costs were reliable.
USED MOTOR OIL
Five to ten open top drums will be available at each site for
interim collection and testing of oil and oil filters. The drums
will be placed on a layer of heavy plastic surrounded by a barrier
of sand for containment of any potential spill. As the oil is
collected it will be visually inspected and poured into an open
drum. once a drum is full, a Chlor-D-Tect test will be done to
determine the purity of the contents.
OIL FILTERS
All used oil filters will go into one of the open top drums and be
labeled accordingly for management by Burlington Environmental at
their Kent TSD facility. All filters will be crushed, the oil
extracted for energy recovery and the spent crushed filter packaged
for hazardous waste landfill.
COLLECTION
A 2800 gallon compartmentalized pumper truck will rotate between
sites removing the oil and oil filters and transporting the oil to
Burlington Environmental 's Pier 91 TSD facility for processing and
blending as an on-spec fuel. Any contaminated used oil will be
managed at Burlington Environmental Georgetown TSD facility and
Description of Proposed City of Kent
Used Motor Oil Collection Events
Page 2
blended for energy recovery for use in an EPA permitted hazardous
waste fuel cement kiln.
STAFFING
Two First Class Firefighters specially trained in hazardous
materials handling will be available at each of the sites to
collect the oil and assist in the proper disposal of the material.
We will attempt to . use a scouting group such as Eagle Scouts to
assist with traffic control and distribution of educational
material.
An Assistant Fire Chief will be available during the day and will
rotate from site to site to supervise the firefighters and assist
with any crisis management or spill containment as may be
necessary.
The project coodinator will also rotate from site to site during
the day to assure smooth operation of the event.
The water quality engineer will be available to provide education
and informational material to the participants.
EDUCATIONAL MATERIAL
As mentioned above, we will be distributing educational material to
the participants of the program. We will be contacting King County
Solid Waste, City of Seattle, and Department of Ecology to obtain
copies of any brochures they might have available on oil recycling
and recycling in general for distribution. In addition, we will
develop our own informational brochure for distribution.
ADVERTISING
The events will be advertised by including notices in the City's
utility bills in April and May for the June event and in December
and January for the February event. The notice in the April and
December billings will contain general information on proper oil
collection and disposition. The followup notice will give
specifics as to the collection event, time, and place.
EVALUATION
During the first event, we will be able to determine if any changes
need to be made in staffing levels, collection, and traffic flow.
Responses received to the questionnaire will help us determine if
we need to change the focus of our advertising and if we need to
alter the collection method or locations. The quantity collected
Description of Proposed City of Kent
Used Motor Oil Collection Events
Page 3
will be an indicator of the effectiveness of the program and
whether we should plan on future events.
As participants drive into the site, we will ask that they complete
a questionnaire to help us determine demographics of participants,
effectiveness of our advertising, accessibility of the sites and
any further needs or enhancements to the program. The participants
will be handed a copy of all educational material we will have
available which may include the hazardous wastemobile schedule,
King County brochures, DOE brochures, etc.
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 3
or reduces the size of future additions. Metro is paying 56% of
the cost of this project. Wickstrom added we are recommending
award to Robison Construction. The Committee unanimously
recommended accepting the bid of Robison Construction.
POP" Used oil Collection Event
Wickstrom stated we applied for a grant to hold two used motor oil
collection events. We have received grant approval paying for the
costs involved in holding the event with no match from the City.
Since the grant agreement will not be signed in time to hold the
first event in July, the Health Department has given us
authorization to expend funds prior to signing the actual
agreement. The initial costs would come from the Environmental
Fund which would be reimbursed by the grant. The Executive
Committee has approved this approach. It was explained that two
sites would be available on July 18 with one site being the city
shops area and the other the East Hill fire station on 116th.
Participants would be able to bring their used motor oil for
disposition. The Committee unanimously recommended adopting the
used oil collection grant funds that are made available and to
proceed with this project.
Dead Tree Short Plat
Wickstrom explained that a water extension and some street
improvements were constructed by the developer of the Dead Tree
Short. Those improvements are completed and the developer is now
asking for the City to accept same. The Committee unanimously
recommended approval to accept the improvements.
Interagency Agreement with King County - 196th/200th Corridor
Wickstrom stated this agreement is for the design of the west leg
of the 196th corridor from Orillia over to WVH. This is a joint
project with the County. The County is willing to pay their share
of the project from the middle of the river over to Orillia. We
have a TIB grant and street utility funds to pay the City's portion
of the project. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement
Wickstrom explained this is an interlocal agreement with the County
which enables us to secure State funding for the Commute Trip
Reduction Program we are required to implement. The City would be
eligible for approximately $130, 000 over a two year period. There
are approximately 64 businesses in Kent that exceed 100 employees.
V
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16. 1992
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: 1992 JAIL HEALTH SERVICES CONTRACT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign 1992
Jail Health Services Contract with Seattle-King County
Department of Public Health. This contract provides for
nursing staff for the inmates.
3 . EXHIBITS: Contract
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and Public Safety Committee 6/1/92 (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $89 ,508
SOURCE OF FUNDS: General Fund
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 30
Contractor: Seattle-King County Department of
Public Health
Address : 110 Prefontaine Place South
Suite 600
Seattle, Washington 98104
Services Provided: Jail Health Services
Amount : $89, 508
Duration: January 1, 1992 through
December 31, 1992
Liaison, Health Barbara Hadley
Department : (206) 296-1082
City of Kent : Captain Dennis Byerly
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98031
CONTRACT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into as of the 1st day of January, 1992, by the City
of Kent, hereinafter referred to as the "City, " and the Seattle-King County
Department of Public Health, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor, "
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the City is undertaking certain activities necessary to meet health
needs as they relate to correctional health services; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Contractor to render certain
services in connection with such undertaking of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows :
I . Scope of Services
A. The Contractor' s responsibilities include:
1 . Scheduling
A nurse practitioner and a public health nurse will be
routinely scheduled for 20 hours/week. Holidays and leaves
of absence will necessitate variation in the scheduling of
personnel and ability to recruit appropriate staff may limit
ability to provide service.
2 . Sick Call
a. A minimum of 20 hours/week of sick call will be
available. It will be scheduled Monday through
Friday. Clinic hours will be determined by mutual
agreement . Sick call consists of diagnostic and
treatment services for acute and chronic illness and
will be provided by nurse practitioner and public
health nurse staff consistent with Section A. 1 .
Contract for Services - January 1, 1992
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 2
b. Treatment of acute or chronic medical conditions will
be limited by:
• licensure, •certification, and training of nurse
practitioners and public health nurses .
• availability of monitoring, observational and
treatment capabilities of qualified staff.
• availability of support and consultant resources .
C . Laboratory tests ordered by Contractor staff will be
provided by the Contractor.
3 . 14-day Health Appraisal
a. 14-day health appraisals will be conducted within the
10th and 17th day of confinement .
b. The 14-day health appraisal will include:
• basic medical/health history,
• vital signs,
• brief physical examination,
• TB skin test,
• syphilis serology,
• review of Contractor-approved Reviewing/Screening
form.
4 . Health Receiving Screening
a. The Contractor will update, as necessary, the Health
Receiving/Screening form.
b. The Contractor staff will train officers in use and
application of the form.
C . The Contractor staff will review all Health
Receiving/Screening Forms and recommend appropriate
follow-up:
5 . Triage
a. Contractor staff will review written inmate
complaints/requests during normal Monday through
Friday clinic hours .
b. Corrections staff will collect written inmate
complaints/requests during the hours the Contractor
staff are not at the correction facility.
C. Contractor staff will prioritize complaints/requests
and will follow-up as appropriate.
6 . Medical Records
a. Contractor staff will maintain the medical records
system.
b. Contractor staff will maintain a system which protects
the confidentiality of health information.
C . Corrections staff will insure the provisions of
Section 5 .b above are maintained.
d. Contractor staff, upon notification of corrections
staff, will prepare appropriate information on inmates
transferred to another correctional facility.
Contract for Services - January 1, 1992
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 3
e. Contractor is the keeper of the health records .
Release of any confidential health information will be
done by the Contractor per the Contractor' s policy and
procedures.
£. City will pay for clerical staff 2 hours per week to
handle medical records .
7 . Policy and Procedure Manual
Contractor will maintain a policy and procedure manual for
activities and services provided by Contractor staff.
8 . Medications
Prescriptions written by Contractor will be supplied in
standard pharmacy packing through a pharmacy contract to a
maximum Contractor' s responsibility of $600 . , unless
renegotiated by the City and Contractor. This pharmacy
contract will be obtained by and for the Contractor.
9 . Medication Administration
Contractor staff will administer all jail health-approved
medications to the individual inmates when such staff are on
site during normal Monday through Friday clinic .hours . The
City will be responsible for medication distribution at
other times .
10 . Dental Services
Dental services will be limited to emergency care or pain
relief and may be provided at Contractor' s location during
normal clinic hours (8 : 00 AM to 4 :30 PM, Monday through
Friday) . Two (2) hours notification by the City is needed
to make necessary accommodations .
a . Transporting, escort service, and security will be
provided by the City.
b. Payment for dental services will be in accordance with
Section III.B. of this agreement and is separate from
the base agreement.
C . Due to the disruption of normal clinic activity, any
appointment that is more than 15 minutes late will be
rescheduled. The City will be charged for any such
missed appointment, or a cancellation without at least
24 hours notice, at the rate of a normal examination.
11. Telephone Consultation Services
Contractor staff will provide limited telephone consultation
to Corrections staff during periods when the clinic is not
scheduled. This service is subject to the following
limitations :
a. Contractor staff will be available only at telephone
numbers which they will provide .
Contract for Services - January 1, 1992
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 4
b. Contractor staff will not be on any form of "standby. "
C . Contractor staff availability depends on their
voluntary presence at a given telephone site and
willingness to participate.
d. Contractor staff participation is strictly voluntary
at all times .
e . The City will be charged for not less than 15 minutes
of Contractor staff time for each telephone
consultation and in increments of 15 minutes for any
time after that for each incident . The charge for
service time will be according to personnel costs for
labor at the time of consultation in accordance to
Washington State Nursing Association-King County
contract or King County Personnel rules, whichever
applies . This cost will be above and beyond the
amount listed in the basic contract .
f . Such telephone consultation will be limited to basic
medical triage/screening and not be construed as
emergency care. Contractor staff will provide advice
regarding necessary further action required.
a. Contractor staff who receive consulting telephone
calls will maintain a log indicating the date, time
length of call, and general call content. This log
will be reviewed at least quarterly or upon request,
with the City of Kent Correctional Facility
administrator.
h. An itemized list of telephone consultations, including
actual costs, will be submitted by the Contractor to
the City of Kent Correctional Facility administrator
on a monthly basis .
12 . The Contractor' s Jail Health Service administrator or
designee will meet quarterly with the City' s Correctional
Facility administrator and review the health care delivery
system.
13 . The Contractor will provide quarterly and annual statistical
reports on the health care delivery system in the City' s
correctional facility.
B. The City' s responsibilities include :
1 . Providing an appropriate examination room, furnishings,
telephone, and security for the Contractor' s staff.
2 . Providing for the security of records and maintenance of
confidentiality when Contractor staff is not on site.
3 . Providing medical, dental and pharmacy services not
specifically provided by the Contractor, and any psychiatric
services.
4 . The City' s correctional facility administrator will meet
quarterly with the Contractor' s jail health administrator or
designee to review the health care delivery system.
Contract for Services - January 1, 1992
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 5
II. Time of Performance
The services of the Contractor are to commence on the 1st day of
January, 1992, and terminate on the 31st day of December, 1992. The
duration of the contract may be extended or terminated upon mutual
written agreement between the parties hereto and pursuant to the terms
and conditions of the agreement .
III . Compensation. and Method of Pavment
A. The City agrees to compensate the Contractor in the total amount
not to exceed $89, 058 - see Exhibit A. The City shall make
payment within 30 days of receipt and approval of invoices (s)
B. The City shall reimburse the Contractor for dental services - see
Exhibit B. The City shall make payment within 30 days of receipt
and approval of invoice (s) .
C. The 1992 contract amount includes indirect overhead charges based
on annually established County and Departmental rates .
IV. Indemnification
The City shall defend, protect, and hold harmless the Contractor, its
elected and appointed officials, and any employees thereof, from and
against all claims, suits or actions, including the cost of. defense
thereof, arising from any negligent act or omission, or violation of
constitutional or civil rights committed by the City Pursuant to this
contract .
The City agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph extend to
any claim, demand or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any
employee of the City against the Contractor, its officer, agents or
employees, and includes any judgement, award, and cost arising
therefrom, including attorney' s fees .
The Contractor shall defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its
elected and appointed officials, and any employees thereof, from and
against all claims, suits or actions, including the cost of defense
thereof, arising from any negligent act or omission of the Contractor
pursuant to this contract . The Contractor agrees that the obligation
to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its agents and
employees under this subparagraph extends to any claim, demand or
cause of action brought by or on behalf of any employee of the
Contractor against the City, its officers, agents or employees, and
includes any judgement, award, and cost arising therefrom, including
attorney' s fees .
V. Changes
Either party may request changes in the scope of services, performing
or reporting standards, or budget provided herein. Proposed changes
which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated by written
amendments to this agreement, signed by both parties . This contract
supersedes all previous contracts or agreements relative to services.
Contract for Services - January 1, 1992
City of Kent/Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
Page 6
VI . Termination
The City may, by written notice of default to the Contractor,
terminate the whole or any part of the Agreement if, (1) the
Contractor fails to provide services called for by this Agreement
within the time specified herein, or if, (2) funding becomes no longer
available for the project described herein.
Either party to this Agreement may terminate the whole or any part of
the Agreement for any reason by providing written notice to the other
party thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of termination.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be
executed the day and year first herein written.
CITY OF KENT SEATTLE-KING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC HEALTH
Signature ature Jr USSA;iG�c'o*
�40 CAUN ;D V:YE.
Dan Kelleher
Name Name
Mavor 7-�f2v—
Title Title
ATTEST: ATTEST:
City Clerk Departpffenkf Eikecu ive V
Adm s at nLl__111
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
King County Prosecuting Attorney
EXHIBIT A
BUDGET
Kent Jail Health Program
January 1 , 1992 through December 31, 1992
Personnel Costs
Family Nurse Practitioner at $23 . 78 per hour 1044 hrs $24, 828
Public Health Nurse at $20 . 98 per hour 1044 hrs 21, 906
Administrative Specialist I at $10 . 77 per hour 104 hrs 11120
Intermittent Nursing Hours at $22 . 16 per hour 157 hrs 3 , 479
Subtotal : $51, 333
Overtime Estimate 21500
Salary and wage Contingency 71061
nge Benefits (28%) : $13, 708
Total Personnel Costs : $74, 602
Support Costs
Office Supplies $ 100
Pharmaceuticals 600
Publications
150
Medical Supplies 400
Misc . Operating Supplies 100
Laboratory Services 508
Mileage 500
Total Support Costs : $2, 358
Contract Overhead (16%) S 12 , 098
PROJECT TOTAL: $89, 058
Rev. 1/12/90
-1 E`fec .
MOST COMMON DENTAL PROCEDURES
FULL 75X OF 506� OF 25% OF -C-
PHIS FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE
PROCEDURE Code D C B
DIAGNOSTIC
Initial Exam D011O1 5 10.00 7 .50 5.00 2.50
Periodic Exam OD1201 10.00 7.50 5.00 2.50
Emergency Exam 001301 10.00 7.50 5.00 2.50
Film PA, 1st 002201 5.00 3.75 2.50 1. 25
Film PA, Add' 1 002301 1. 00 .75 .50 .25
Film, D, 1 002701 5.00 3.75 2.50 1 .25
Films , BWX 2 002721 6.00 4.50 3.00 1.50
Films , BWX 4 002741 6.00 6.00 4.00 2.00
Films , BW'A, Add ' l 002751 1.00 .75 .50 .25
RESTORATIVE
Amal Dec 1 surf 021101 23.00 17.25 11.50 5.75
Amal Dec 2 surf 021201 33.00 24 .75 16.50 8.25
Am)a1 Dec 3 surf 021301 38.00 28.50 19 .00 9.50
A m a I Dec 4 surf 021311 45.00 33.75 22.50 11.25
Amal Perm 1 surf 021401 25.00 18.75 12 .50 6.25
Amal Perm 2 surf 021501 37.00 27.75 18.50 9.25
Amal Perm 3 surf 021601 46.00 34.50 23.00 11.50
Aural Perm 4 surf 021611 58.00 43.50 29 .00 14 .50
Ant Comp 1 *surf 023301 28.00 21.00 14.00 7.00
Ant Comp 2 surf 023311 42.00 31.50 21 .00 10.50
Ant Comp 3 surf 023321 54 .00 40.50 27.00 13. 50
Ant Comno 4 surf 023351 64 .00 48.00 32.00 16.00
Recement Crown C29201 16.00 12.00 6.00 =. .00
SSC Crown Dec 029301 51 .00 38.25 25.50 12.75
SSC Crown Perm 029311 56. 00 42 .00 28.00 14.00
Resin Crown 029321 63.00 47.23 31.50 15.75
PREVENTIVE
Prophy, adult 011101 30.00 22.50 15.00 7.50
Prophy, child 011201 21.00 15 .75 10.50 5.25
Topical Applications 12011 32.00 24 .00 16.00 8.00
j Fluoride 012031 11.00 8. 25 5.50 2.75
Sealant 013511 10.00 7 .50 5. 00 2. 50
/� L
50; i.
PEI5 FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE FULL FE_
PRO-EDUPE Code E D C E
,....PACE �'�I h'TE►;ARCS
Fixed Unilat . 015101 57 .00 42.75 28. 50 14 .25
Fixed Eilat. 015151 7E.00 56.50 39 . 00 19 . 50
ReCement Spacer 015501 16.00 12 .00 6. 00 4 . 00
P=RI DDONTI CS
RcOt Planing Quad 043411 25.00 1E.75 12 . 50 6. 25
ERDODORTICS
Pulp Cap. Di-. C31101 9. D0 6. 75 4 . 50 2. 25
Pu1p0t0Ty 032201 25.00 18.75 12. 50 6. 25
One Canal 033101 133. 00 99.75 66 . 50 33 .25
Two Canals 033201 1ES.00 138.75 92 .50 45 . 25
Three Canals C.33301 24O.OD 130.00. 120.00 60. 00
Apexirication 033501 25.00 18.7S 12 . 50 6.25
PROST':=TICS _
R Co,.,plete Upper 051101 330.00 247.50 155 .00 82 . 50
Co.,Iplete Lowe- 051201 33C.00 247.50 165. 0D 82. 50
Partial Upper QS2131 325.OD 243.75 152.50 E:. 25
:rtial Loy,=. 0�52141 325.00 2=.3.75 162. 50 c1 .2S
jus Upper CD 0S4101 15.00 11.25 7. 50 ...75
AdjCst Lower CD 0S4 a_ _.5.00 s1 .2S 7. 50 3. 75
Adj"st U Partial 054211 1S.Oo _1 .25 7. 50 3.75
Adjust L Partial 05=.221 15.00 11.25 7. 50 3. 75
me Upper C57501 100.00 7 5 .00 50. 00 25 . 00
'r.=_iine Loner 057511 100.00 7S. 00 50. 00 2S. 00
'eIin U Partial CS76G1 92.n0 69.00 45.00 23 .00
=line L Partial 0576s1 92.00 6° .DO 46. 00 23. QO
Tissue Condition CSE501 _...OD 1_' . 50 9. 00 4 . 50
Repair (write in)
ORAL SU�c=PY
=Xt. Sincle Tooth 071101 2S. D0 20.75 12. 50 6. 25
Ext. Add' 1 Teeth 071201 20.00 15.00 20.00 5. 00
Rcot Re.-.10val 071301 25.00 19 . 50 13 .00 6. 50
SurciCal Ext. G72101 S�.Oo 39 . 75 26. 50
Ire. 7 . 50
and Drain C7SIn1 30.00 22 . 5G _5. 00
L
L rU �7 �
PHIS FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE FULL FEE
PRO;EDURE Code E D C "o _
MI SC
TKJ Splint 076801 150.00 112. 50 75.00 ?J . 50
Palliative Treat. 091101 19.00 14 .25 9. 50 4 . 75
Management Prob. 099201 6.00 4 . 50 3. 00 1. 50
Consult DSHS manual for cones and fees for procedures not listed above.
1/1/90
RF:EC/nr
EXHIBIT C
INVOICE
Kent Jail Health Program
January 1, 1992 through December 31, 11,92
Jail Health Services provided by the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health for the Citv
of Kent for the period of
Personnel Costs (1/12) Hours Charaes
Familv Nurse Practitioner $
Public Health Nurse $
Administrative Specialist I $
Intermittent Nursing Hours $
Subtotal: $
Overtime $
Salary and wage Contingency $
Fringe Benefits $
Total Personnel Costs: $
port Costs (Actuals)
Office Supplies $
Pharmaceuticals $
Publications $
Medical Supplies $
Misc. Operating Supplies $
7-abcratory Services $
Mileage $
Total Support Costs: $
Total Direct Costs: $
Contract Overhead (1/12) $
TOTAL. INVOICE: $
NOTE: Supplies and services billed at actual
Personnel and indirect billed on a 1/12th basis; December adjustment from actuals
I�
Kent City Council Meeting
\ Date June 16. 1992
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: Vetoed Fireworks Ordinance
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT:
The current drought conditions in the Paci is Northwest
created the probability for a serious fir threat this
summer. As a consequence, during the 2, 1992
council meeting, an emergency ordinance limiting discharge
of fireworks to July 4th was considered and passed.
Following its passage, the ordinance was vetoed by the
mayor. The vetoed ordinance is being submitted for the
record and consideration by Council .
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance No. 3045
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Department
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember ��n` iti'� moves, Councilmember /' seconds
to enter vetoed Ordinance No. 3045 into the record ai-\ )
to override the Mayor' s veto of Ordinance No . 3045 .
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
i
I
ORDINANCE NO. 3� s
�. I
AN ORDINANCE of the City
Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, relating to the
discharge of fireworks within the
city.
WHEREAS, pursuant to KCC 13 . 09 . 010, the City of Kent
adopted, by reference, RCW 70. 77 , the State Fireworks Law; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 70. 77 . 395, fireworks may be
discharged within the City from 12 o' clock noon on June 28 to 12
o'clock noon on July 6 of each year, and that no fireworks may be
discharged between the hours of 11 o'clock p.m. and 9 o'clock
a.m. ; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 70 . 77 . 250 (4) , municipalities
are granted concurrent jurisdiction over fireworks regulations
and, in certain instances, may enact more restrictive
regulations; and
WHEREAS, the current drought conditions in the Pacific
Northwest has created the probability of a serious fire threat,
resulting in the worst fire conditions in recent history; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A. 12 . 130, the City Council,
with the declaration of a public emergency, may pass an emergency
ordinance for the protection of public health, public safety,
i
public property, or the public peace, which ordinance may be
effective immediately; and
i
l
III
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that an
:' emergency condition does exist due to the current drought
g Y
conditions within the City of Kent; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
" HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
i
Section 1. Declaration of Emergency. The City Council
1does hereby declare that there exists an emergency condition
affecting the public health, public safety, public property, or
public peace as a result of the current drought conditions
existing within the City of Kent, as well as the Pacific
Northwest region, which has been compounded by the limiting use
of water for irrigation of lawns and shrubbery in the region, and
that such emergency condition necessitates the need to restrict
the discharge of fireworks through the passage of an emergency
ordinance.
Section 2 . Discharge of Fireworks. The discharge of
fireworks pursuant to the rules, regulations, and provisions
adopted by Kent City Code 13 . 09 . 010 is restricted as follows:
No common fireworks, as defined in RCW 70. 77 . 126, shall
be discharged within the City of Kent except from 9 o ' clock a.m.
to 12 o'clock midnight, July 4 , 1992 .
Section 3 . Penalty. Any violation of the provisions
of this ordinance shall constitute a misdemeanor punishable by a
fine of one hundred dollars ($100 . 00) or by imprisonment not
exceeding ninety (90) days or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Each violation shall constitute a separate offense.
it 2
�I
i
I
I
Section 4. Inconsistent Provisions. During the
effective period of this ordinance, as set forth below, the
,provisions of this ordinance shall prevail over KCC Chapter 13 . 09
to the extent KCC Chapter 13 . 09 is inconsistent.
Section 5. Effective Date. Pursuant to RCW
35A. 12 . 130, this ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
The provisions of this ordinance are temporary and shall remain
in effect only until July 31, 1992 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
BRENDA JACOBER, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
52
V CH CITY ATTORNEY
ROGER A. LUBO I ,
PASSED the day of 99
( APPROVED the day of
PUBLISHED the day of 19
I hereby certify that this is a true and rr ct p
lof Ordinance No. passed by the City Council f t
3
it
��
C �
��
��� �
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 16, 1992
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: 1992 ASPHALT OVERLAY
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was May 20 and three bids
were received. The project includes overlay of several streets
within the City with the scope of work broken down into seven
different schedules. The low bidder for all seven schedules
was Lakeside Industries; however, project funds are only
sufficient to complete the first four schedules. The law
bidder for those four schedules is M. A. Segale. We therefore
recommend;, and�Public Works Committee has concurred with,
awarding Schedules 1-4 of the 1992 Asphalt Overlay Program to
M. A. Segale for the bid amount of $142, 536. 20.
AA C, V E 0
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, bid summary and
excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: N0-_ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember �� moves, Councilmember seconds
that Schedules 1-4 of the 1992 Asphalt Overlay Program be
awarded to M. A. Segale for $142 , 536.20.
DISCUSSION• V)-/O
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 27, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROMbv"
RE: 1992 ASPHALT OVERLAY
The proposed 1992 Asphalt Overlay program included overlay of:
o Schedule 1 - S. 212th Street (84th Ave S. to UPRR)
o Schedule 2 - North 1st Avenue (James Street to termination
point)
o Schedule 3 - North 2nd Avenue (James Street to termination
point)
o Schedule 4 - West Cloudy Street (N. 4th Avenue to N. 5th
Avenue)
o Schedule 5 - Cole Street (N. ist Avenue to N. 3rd Avenue)
o Schedule 6 - Cloudy Street (N. ist Avenue to N. 3rd Avenue
o Schedule 7 - North 3rd Avenue (James Street to termination
point)
Bid opening for this project was May 20, 1992 with the low bid
submitted by Lakeside Industries for the bid amount of $184 , 365 . 30
for all of the above schedules .
For 1992, the City has reserved overlay funds for participation in
King county's 1992 South County Overlay project which includes
several roads shared with Kent. Based on the remaining funds
available for our overlay contract, I recommend awarding only
Schedules 1 through 4 . Low bid for these schedules was M.A.
Segale, Inc. at $142 , 536 . 20. The bid specifications specified that
schedules were subject to deletion based on the above schedule
order.
BID SUMMARY
SCHEDULES I-VII
Lakeside Industries $184, 365 . 30
M.A. Segale, Inc. 184 , 862 . 30
Watson Asphalt Paving Co. , Inc. 192 , 737 . 95
Engineer's Estimate $221, 367 . 50
SCHEDULES I-IV
M.A. Segale, Inc. $142 , 536. 20
Lakeside Industries 143 , 623 . 80
Watson Asphalt Paving Co. , Inc. 150, 702 . 95
Engineer's Estimate $175 , 152 . 50
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 2
Street Closures Ordinances - Balloon Classic and Canterbury Faire
Wickstrom explained these were housekeeping ordinances in order to
be able to close the streets for these events. The ordinances are
the same as has been adopted in previous years. Patrice Thorell
stated that the only difference was that closure of Russell Road
from Meeker south to the dike was added to the ordinance for the
Balloon Classic. The committee unanimously recommended adoption of
the ordinances.
1992 Asphalt Overlay
Wickstrom stated that three bids were received. The low bidder for
all the schedules was Lakeside Industries with M.A. Segale being
the second low. These two bids were within $400 of each other.
The budget only allows us to complete the first four schedules of
the project. In calculating the bids submitted for those four
schedules, M.A. Segale would then be the low bidder. Jim Bennett
asked if we had that option. Wickstrom clarified that the
specifications clearly state that we have the option of deleting
schedules.
Paul Mann referred to a Reader's Digest article citing the problem
with the poor condition of streets in the United States is that we
award to the lowest bidder He questioned if we always award to
the lowest bidder. Wickstrom responded that State law requires us
to accept the lowest responsible bidder. Jim Bennett stated he
feels the citizens might be better served by other than the lowest
bidder. He referred to the process in Europe of selecting a mean
of the bids received. Tom Brubaker added there is some latitude in
the statute if we have substantiation that the lowest bidder is not
a responsible bidder.
Gary Gill added that regardless which contractor is awarded the
contract, the specifications require certain quality assurance and
quality control requirements to be met.
The Committee unanimously recommended approval to award the bid to
M.A. Segale for the first four schedules of the project.
North Park Sanitary Sewer
Wickstrom stated that eight bids were received with the low bid
submitted by Robison Construction. The project rebuilds two
sections of the sewer servicing the North Park area. This is a
joint project with Metro as a pilot project to determine a method
of controlling infiltration/inflow into the sewer. Eliminating
infiltration/inflow lengthens the life of the treatment facilities
(/ Kent City Council Meeting
i Date June 16, 1992
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: NORTH PARK SANITARY SEWER REBUILD
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was June 2 with eight bids
received. The low bider was Robison Construction in the
amount of $192,796. 98 . t o recommendwt that the low bid be
accepted and the contract awarded to Robison Construction.
� l
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Public Works Director, bid summary and
excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (3-0)
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO \ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
that the North Park Sanitary Sewer Rebuild Project be awarded
to Robison Construction in the amount of $192 , 796. 98 .
DISCUSSION: `L'
(1
ACTION: � ,�"�, �p'1 C",
Council Agenda
Item No. 5B
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 27, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM ��lN
RE: NORTH PARK SANITARY SEWER REBUILD
This project is a City of Kent/METRO Infiltration/Inflow pilot
project providing for the removal and replacement of sanitary sewer
mains, stub-outs, clean-outs and manholes and the removal and
replacement of private side sewers .
Bid opening for this project is June 2 .
We will distribute a summary of the bids received and a
recommendation for award at the Committee meeting.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
June 3, 1992
TO: PUBLIC WORKS CONII�ITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM �(� \�
RE: NORTH PARK SANITARY SEWER REBUILD
Eight bids were received on June 2nd for this project. The low bid
was submitted by Robison Construction in the amount of $192,796.98.
It is recommended the bid be accepted and the contract awarded to
Robison Construction.
BID SUMMARY
Robison Construction $192 , 796.98
Kar-Vel Construction 196, 487. 63
Sound Utilities 209, 530. 92
Mer-Con, Inc. 248, 687. 86
Como Contractors 248, 927 . 08
R.L. Alia Co. 255, 150.44
Tri-State Construction 299,493 .87
Glacier Construction 329, 001.58
Engineer's Estimate $241, 217 . 83
Public Works Committee
June 3, 1992
Page 2
Street Closures Ordinances - Balloon Classic and Canterbury Faire
Wickstrom explained these were housekeeping ordinances in order to
be able to close the streets for these events. The ordinances are
the same as has been adopted in previous years. Patrice Thorell
stated that the only difference was that closure of Russell Road
from Meeker south to the dike was added to the ordinance for the
Balloon Classic. The committee unanimously recommended adoption of
the ordinances.
1992 Asphalt Overlay
Wickstrom stated that three bids were received. The low bidder for
all the schedules was Lakeside Industries with M.A. Segale being
the second low. These two bids were within $400 of each other.
The budget only allows us to complete the first four schedules of
the project. In calculating the bids submitted for those four
schedules, M.A. Segale would then be the low bidder. Jim Bennett
asked if we had that option. Wickstrom clarified that the
specifications clearly state that we have the option of deleting
schedules.
Paul Mann referred to a Reader's Digest article citing the problem
with the poor condition of streets in the United States is that we
award to the lowest bidder He questioned if we always award to
the lowest bidder. Wickstrom responded that State law requires us
to accept the lowest responsible bidder. Jim Bennett stated he
feels the citizens might be better served by other than the lowest
bidder. He referred to the process in Europe of selecting a mean
of the bids received. Tom Brubaker added there is some latitude in
the statute if we have substantiation that the lowest bidder is not
a responsible bidder.
Gary Gill added that regardless which contractor is awarded the
contract, the specifications require certain quality assurance and
quality control requirements to be met.
The Committee unanimously recommended approval to award the bid to
M.A. Segale for the first four schedules of the project.
North Park Sanitary Sewer
Wickstrom stated that eight bids were received with the low bid
submitted by Robison Construction. The project rebuilds two
sections of the sewer servicing the North Park area. This is a
joint project with Metro as a pilot project to determine a method
of controlling infiltration/inflow into the sewer. Eliminating
infiltration/inflow lengthens the life of the treatment facilities
or reduces the size of future additions. Metro is paying 56% of
the cost of this project. Wickstrom added we are recommending
award to Robison Construction. The Committee unanimously
recommended accepting the bid of Robison Construction.
Used Oil Collection Event
Wickstrom stated we applied for a grant to hold two used motor oil
collection events. We have received grant approval paying for the
costs involved in holding the event with no match from the City.
Since the grant agreement will not be signed in time to hold the
first event in July, the Health Department has given us
authorization to expend funds prior to signing the actual
agreement. The initial costs would come from the Environmental
Fund which would be reimbursed by the grant. The Executive
Committee has approved this approach. It was explained that two
sites would be available on July 18 with one site being the city
shops area and the other the East Hill fire station on 116th.
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
i
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
D. PLANNING COMMITTEE
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
F. PARKS COMMITTEE
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
i
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 1, 1992 City Clerk
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT: Christi Houser
Leona Orr
STAFF PRESENT: Ed Chow
Kevin Garling
Roger Lubovich
Tony McCarthy
Alana Mclalwain
May Miller
Kelh O'Donnell
Don Olson
John Willits
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Bill Doolittle
Vern Dwight
The meeting was called to order at 4:10 p.m. by Chairperson Houser.
Approval of Vouchers
All claims for the period ending May 29, 1992, in the amount of$1,173,905.89 were approved for payment.
Financial Update (Information Only)
Finance Director McCarthy passed out the April financial report which includes some May figures.
McCarthy reviewed the exhibits with the Committeemembers present noting that there was little change
from the news the Council received in March.
Personnel Policy Updates (Information Only)
Human Resource Director Olson noted that at the last Operations Committee meeting he had asked to come
back and update the Committee on policies implemented or revised. Olson stated that he had four policies
which he distributed. They included:
1. Travel and Business Expenses- Olson noted that this policy was updated and was a corroboration
between Human Resources and Tom Vetsch of Central Services which is modeled after the Bellevue
Plan to bring the policy into the 20th century.
2. Non-represented Layoff Policy- This policy was recently updated in the event that layoffs become
necessary. The policy would cover employees not under Civil Service or collective bargaining
agreements as well as the Teamsters Union which does not have a layoff clause in their contract.
Employees that are under Civil Service or a union contract that covers layoffs will follow the Civil
Service Rules or their contract terms respectively.
1
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES, CONTINUED
June 1, 1992
3. Employee Personnel Files - This is a new policy which outlines retention, purging and access to
employees personnel files.
4. Leave of Absence - This policy was revised to include provisions for voluntary leave without pay.
It allows for employees who wish to take a months vacation without pay or a sabbatical to save
City funds to do so with continued payment of their health and welfare. Previously if an employee
worked for less than half of a month these benefits would not be paid by the City.
Olson noted that the updated policies have been incorporated into the manual in the Council Office for
their reference. During further discussion he asked for Committeemembers to contact him if they had any
questions on the policies.
After asking if there was any further business to be discussed, Chairperson Houser adjourned the meeting
at 4:30 p.m.
2
Brenda Jacober
City Clerk
PARKS COMMITTEE MINUTES
June 2, 1992
Councilmembers Present: Jon Johnson, Chair; Christi Houser and Jim Bennett.
Staff Present: Wd Chow, Barney Wilson,ickstrom, Jack Ball , Karen yFord, ThressamAlstonl,e HandPamn
Rumer.
Others Present: See attached list.
REQUEST FOR CITY TO PURCHASE MIDWAY RESERVOIR FOR USE AS A NEIGHBORHOOD PARK
Bruce Anderson explained that the Midway Reservoir property is being surplused
by the City of Seattle and he felt this would make an excellent neighborhood
park. The property is currently being used by the neighborhood as a playing
field .
When Mr. Anderson asked for signatures in the neighborhood to support a
neighborhood park, he also asked for volunteers for the City's Adopt-A-Park
program, which he felt would take some strain off of the City's budget. Three
of the 15 who signed the list volunteered for the Adopt-A-Park program.
hee has oobservedh�increased the
o useproperty
the property thi seyear by reservoir
kiteof lyer said s and
frisbee throwers.
rovements to maintain the
prop ety'sscurrennderon t use, such as flattening t it would require nthe larea p and adding some landscaping.
Wilson reported that the property consists of four parcels which join Sunnycrest
Elementary. The approximately eight acres are next to the National Guard. He
exlained that are
ve somewhat
hich drop off
are there
and there are l level
trails through thepropertyeatwthis time o whicharewbeding
used.
Wilson mentioned that when Mr. Biteman was on the Council , he was interested in
purchasing the property, but it was never up for sale. He said this is not a
money issue at this time, but rather an issue of whether the committee wishes to
research this further.
Tom Brubaker commented that if Seattle goes to auction, it would be burdensome
if the City of Kent had to authorize a range within which someone could bid. The
auction may also require payment immediately upon awarding the bid.
Brubaker suggested if this develops further, that staff contact the City of
Seattle to see if the City of Kent could avoid the bidding process. He felt this
could be a difficult process.
Mr. Anderson said he was informed by the Seattle Water Department that because
Kent is another municipality, Kent would be next in line to purchase the property
before a public auction would be held.
Councilmember Houser moved to study the issue to determine the price of the
property and the parameters to buy the property.
Councilmember Bennett seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
INTRODUCTION
Pam Rumer introduced Thressa Alston, who will become her job share partner
effective July 1, 1992. Thressa will be attending Parks Committee meetings
during Pam's maternity leave.
GARRISON CREEK HANDBALL COURT UPDATE
Jack Ball said that he spoke with Mr. Mills, who suggested resurfacing the
handball courts with an overlay of stucco-type material to level the court
surface. Ball did not feel this was the best option at this time.
After talking with 40 Rentals, Ball felt that renting a power planer to grind
down the surface to make it smoother is a feasible option. He explained that
staff will have to go back over the surface with a buffer to create a finer
finish. Staff will also patch the side walls with a stucco-type material .
Ball estimated that it will' take approximately 1-1/2 weeks to complete the
project, for a total project cost of $300 ($100 per week to rent the power planer
and $8 a sheet for the sandpaper) . He felt this would better fit within the
budget, as compared to $25,000 for total restoration of the handball courts.
Ball said that this will hopefully satisfy the handball club's needs as well as
help Park Maintenance staff remain within their current budget. He will discuss
this proposal with Mr. Mills, as Ball 's intent is to schedule this project within
the next few weeks.
RESCHEDULE NEXT PARKS COMMITTEE MEETING
The 5:30 PM June 16 Parks Committee was rescheduled for 3:00-4:00 PM in the
Council Chambers East on June 16, as there is a Council workshop at 6:00 PM that
evening. The committee decided to continue meeting at 5:30 PM and to schedule
special meetings when there are conflicts.
OTHER
• Bill Doolittle asked if a Golf Advisory Board has been appointed yet. The
committee responded that there has been no official action.
• Helen Wickstrom reported that the Interurban Trail will be completed soon
and asked if it would require Parks Committee action to accept the project
as complete. The committee directed her to place the issue on the Consent
Calendar for full Council approval once the project is complete.
PARRS COMMITTEE MEETING
June 2, 1992
Attendance
Name Address/Department Phone No.
1. 3 34 5
3 . 4uea Moan, 2y3,2y m,crn4 y ,pD, $o. KQ�T g/O-77OZ
4 . 32vL A 'v 9 on) d ��/— 4-G7(o
5.
6.
9 .
10 .
11.
12 .
13 .
14 .
15.
16.
17 .
18 .
19 .
20 .
21.
22 .
CITY OF )Q\U!2ZSV
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 21 1992 4 : 00 PM
COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT OTHER CITY STAFF
Leona Orr, Chair Tom Brubaker
Jim Bennett Ed Chow
Jon Johnson Rob Dreblow
Tony McCarthy
PLANNING STAFF GUESTS
Sharon Clamp Bill Doolittle
Jim Harris Rae Reitan, City Historian
Fred Satterstrom Linda Van Nest
Margaret Porter
GROWTH MANAGEMENT UPDATE - (F SATTERSTROM)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom stated a public hearing was held
by the Growth Management Planning Council (GMPC) at Kent City Hall
on Wednesday, May 27, 1992, to discuss the emerging countywide
policies. The GMPC is still working with a July 1, 1992 deadline
for adoption of the policies by the King County Council. Mr.
Satterstrom indicated the possibility exists that this deadline
will not be met. The City will be affected if this deadline is
extended because the City is required to have its comprehensive
plan in place by July 1, 1993 .
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on Monday,
June 8, 1992 to discuss Kent' s urban growth area. A recommendation
is expected by late June.
The Planning Commission began their deliberations on the wetlands
ordinance on May 18 and will continue the discussion at their
meeting on June 22, 1992 .
Anton Nelessen will present the results of Kent's visual preference
survey at the City Council workshop on June 16, 1992 . Highlights
of the Kent Community Forum results will be presented during the
regular Council meeting on June 16, and the session conveners will
also be recognized.
HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE UPDATE
No update was provided.
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 21 1992
PAGE 2
MUSEUM SERVICES AGREEMENT (J. HARRIS)
Planning Director James Harris stated the City is being asked to
approve the White River Historical Society Museum agreement for
1992 . The agreement does not specify a dollar amount except to say
that Kent can appoint one member to the Board of Directors if
Kent's level of annual funding does not fall below $2 ,500. That
amount has been set aside in the 1992 budget.
Mr. Harris recommended that Kent pay the $2,500 for 1992. In
addition, he recommended that the City investigate the feasibility
of working with Kent citizens to explore the possibility of
establishing a Kent museum.
City Historian Rae Reitan reported that the old timers committee
has agreed to sponsor a Kent historical society. A meeting will be
held on Saturday, June 30, at 11:30 a.m. at Mom's Kitchen. At this
meeting a chairman will be elected and a committee will be formed
to work on constitutional by-laws.
Linda Van Nest, President of the White River Historical Society,
expressed her thanks for Kent's support and stated that the Society
is still a regional facility and has not changed its goals for the
future.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Bennett SECONDED a
motion to approve the White River Historical Society Museum
agreement for 1992 . Planning Director Harris clarified that the
item will be placed on the consent calendar at the June 16, 1992
Council meeting. Motion carried.
FEDERAL WAY PLAN UPDATE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
(F. SATTERSTROM)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom reported that King County is
proposing to update the Federal Way Community Plan. He explained
that there is unincorporated land that lies between Auburn and
Federal Way that both cities are claiming in their urban growth
area. Mr. Satterstrom presented a map showing that this planning
area comes into Kent's sphere of interest in the Midway and Star
Lake areas. The agreement asks for Kent' s commitment to coordinate
with King County in an interlocal planning process.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Bennett SECONDED a
motion to initiate the Federal Way Community Plan Update. Motion
carried.
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 2 , 1992
PAGE 3
WEST HILL ISLAND ANNEXATION (T. BRUBAKER)
Assistant City Attorney Tom Brubaker recommended the Committee pass
a motion directing him to draft a resolution announcing the City's
intent to annex the West Hill Island. He presented a timeline for
the annexation process and explained that if the Council passes the
resolution to annex at its June 16, 1992 meeting the date for the
public hearing would be set for the next Council meeting on July 7,
1992. After taking public testimony, the Council can pass an
ordinance to annex the island which will not become effective for
45 days. During the 45 day period the ordinance is subject to
referendum. Since this is a small area, very few signature are
needed to initiate a referendum election and it is likely that the
necessary signatures will be received. The citizens will have
until August 21, 1991 to initiate a petition and the election would
occur either at the September 15, 1992 primary or November 3, 1992
general election.
Councilmember Johnson MOVED and Councilmember Bennett SECONDED a
motion to proceed with the annexation process. Councilmember
Johnson clarified that a resolution will go to the City Council on
June 16, 1992 to set a public hearing on July 7, 1992 . Margaret
Porter clarified that citizens of the affected area should be
notified of the public hearing on July 7, and Jim Harris added
individual notices should be sent to each resident. Tom Brubaker
added that notification should not take place until after the
Council passes the resolution on June 16 . Motion carried.
PROCEDURES ON WETLANDS (C. PROUD)
At a prior Planning Committee meeting it was suggested that staff
make a presentation to the Committee so they may better understand
how wetlands in Kent are being administered. Senior Planner Carol
Proud presented an inventory map of the City of Kent wetlands, the
Interim Wetland Guidelines, and used as an example the review
process for a single family residential permit when a sensitive
area such as creeks, hillsides or wetlands are impacted.
ADDED ITEMS
CHESTNUT RIDGE PROPOSED ANNEXATION (J. HARRIS)
Planning Director Harris informed the Committee that a ten percent
annexation petition has been received from the citizens of a single
family area known as Chestnut Ridge. This area lies between South
200 and 208 Street and 100 Avenue SE and the Valley Freeway. Mr.
Harris stated if the Council accepts the petition the Planning
department will have to do a SEPA checklist and the cost benefits
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE MINUTES
JUNE 2 , 1992
PAGE 4
of annexing the area will have to be looked at carefully in light
of the present financial status of the City.
WORK RELEASE PROGRAM (J. HARRIS)
Planning Director James Harris read a memo received from Alana
McIalwain requesting that citizens Paul Hammerschmidt and Cheryle
Noble be placed on the Public Safety and Planning Committee Agendas
to discuss Work Release Program. Councilwoman Orr believes there
are State guidelines for how far certain undesirable uses can
legally be set from certain uses such as schools, churches, etc.
It was thought that possibly recent news articles about the State
wanting to locate work release programs in south King County
triggered the citizen's request and that their concern is not
related to the regional justice center issue.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 4:48 p.m.
PC0602 .92
PUBLIC WORKS COMMMEE
JUNE 31 1992
PRESENT: JIM WHITE TONY MCCARTHY
PAUL MANN DICK GILLISSE
JIM BENNETT PATRICE THORELL
DON WICKSTROM BILL DOOLITTLE
TOM BRUBAKER HOWARD WOODWARD
GARY GILL DIANA WOODWARD
ED CHOW JOAN JANSEN
ED WHITE
Chestnut Ridge Annexation
Wickstrom explained the annexation was initiated by the property
owners of the area. It involves about 190 acres. We have received
a 10% petition for annexation and according to State law, the City
has to act on that petition within sixty days of receipt.
Wickstrom added that we have not completed the financial analysis
of the annexation but would have that available for Council at
their public meeting with the petitioners . It was recommended the
date for the public meeting be set for July 7 .
Ms. Jansen who is chairperson of the annexation committee commented
that they are excited about the possibility of annexation primarily
for additional police protection but they want to become a part of
the Kent community. She commented that Renton was also considering
annexation of their area and there is little enthusiasm on the part
of the homeowners to become a part of Renton. She added she
thought the assessed valuation of their area, approximately $38
million, would bring in additional revenue for the City. Howard
Woodward who is president of the homeowners association spoke in
further support of the annexation.
Jim White stated that the general rule of thumb is that annexation
of single family property does not generate as much revenue as it
costs to service whereas warehousing is about equal and retail is
a plus. That is why a financial analysis is essential for the
Council information. He added he thinks the City should be
annexing and bringing in those who have a Kent address, are served
by Kent schools, Kent parks department programs and Kent utilities,
Kent fire and possibly even police.
The Committee unanimously recommended approval to set July 7 as
date to meet with the petitioners.
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 2
Street Closures Ordinances - Balloon Classic and Canterbury Faire
Wickstrom explained these were housekeeping ordinances in order to
be able to close the streets for these events. The ordinances are
the same as has been adopted in previous years. Patrice Thorell
stated that the only difference was that closure of Russell Road
from Meeker south to the dike was added to the ordinance for the
Balloon Classic. The committee unanimously recommended adoption of
the ordinances.
1992 Asphalt Overlay
Wickstrom stated that three bids were received. The low bidder for
all the schedules was Lakeside Industries with M.A. Segale being
the second low. These two bids were within $400 of each other.
The budget only allows us to complete the first four schedules of
the project. In calculating the bids submitted for those four
schedules, M.A. Segale would then be the low bidder. Jim Bennett
asked if we had that option. Wickstrom clarified that the
specifications clearly state that we have the option of deleting
schedules.
Paul Mann referred to a Reader's Digest article citing the problem
with the poor condition of streets in the United States is that we
award to the lowest bidder He questioned if we always award to
the lowest bidder. Wickstrom responded that State law requires us
to accept the lowest responsible bidder. Jim Bennett stated he
feels the citizens might be better served by other than the lowest
bidder. He referred to the process in Europe of selecting a mean
of the bids received. Tom Brubaker added there is some latitude in
the statute if we have substantiation that the lowest bidder is not
a responsible bidder.
Gary Gill added that regardless which contractor is awarded the
contract, the specifications require certain quality assurance and
quality control requirements to be net.
The Committee unanimously recommended approval to award the bid to
M.A. Segale for the first four schedules of the project.
North Park Sanitary Sewer
Wickstrom stated that eight bids were received with the low bid
submitted by Robison Construction. The project rebuilds two
sections of the sewer servicing the North Park area. This is a
joint project with Metro as a pilot project to determine a method
of controlling infiltration/inflow into the sewer. Eliminating
infiltration/inflow lengthens the life of the treatment facilities
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 3
or reduces the size of future additions. Metro is paying 56% of
the cost of this project. Wickstrom added we are recommending
award to Robison Construction. The Committee unanimously
recommended accepting the bid of Robison Construction.
Used Oil Collection Event
Wickstrom stated we applied for a grant to hold two used motor oil
collection events. We have received grant approval paying for the
costs involved in holding the event with no match from the City.
Since the grant agreement will not be signed in time to hold the
first event in July, the Health Department has given us
authorization to expend funds prior to signing the actual
agreement. The initial costs would come from the Environmental
Fund which would be reimbursed by the grant. The Executive
Committee has approved this approach. It was explained that two
sites would be available on July 18 with one site being the city
shops area and the other the East Hill fire station on 116th.
Participants would be able to bring their used motor oil for
disposition. The Committee unanimously recommended adopting the
used oil collection grant funds that are made available and to
proceed with this project.
Dead Tree Short Plat
Wickstrom explained that a water extension and some street
improvements were constructed by the developer of the Dead Tree
Short. Those improvements are completed and the developer is now
asking for the City to accept same. The Committee unanimously
recommended approval to accept the improvements.
Interagency Agreement with King County - 196th/200th Corridor
Wickstrom stated this agreement is for the design of the west leg
of the 196th corridor from Orillia over to WVH. This is a joint
project with the County. The County is willing to pay their share
of the project from the middle of the river over to Orillia. We
have a TIB grant and street utility funds to pay the City's portion
of the project. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
the Mayor to sign the agreement.
Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement
Wickstrom explained this is an interlocal agreement with the County
which enables us to secure State funding for the Commute Trip
Reduction Program we are required to implement. The City would be
eligible for approximately $130, 000 over a two year period. There
are approximately 64 businesses in Kent that exceed 100 employees.
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 4
Jim White confirmed that the Chamber has reviewed this. Jim
Bennett asked about staffing for the program. Wickstrom explained
that we have a consultant who is developing the program. Tom
Brubaker brought to the committee's attention that they have a
draft of the agreement. We should be receiving the final form
before the June 16 Council meeting. In order to meet the required
time frame for signature, he asked for authority to make any minor
modifications that may be required with the understanding that if
any substantial changes are required we will bring it back before
the Committee. The Committee unanimously recommended approval for
signature of the Commute Trip Reduction Plan interlocal agreement
upon approval of the final form by the City Attorney.
Central Avenue Improvement (Lowe to Titus) TIB Grant
Wickstrom stated we have received a construction grant from the
Transportation Improvement Board for the improvement of Central
between Gowe and Titus. This is a one-block widening project which
adds a right turn lane at Gowe and Titus as well an overlay from
Willis to Smith Street. The Committee unanimously recommended
approval to accept the grant and authorization for the Mayor to
sign.
Cornucopia Days Ordinance
This ordinance is similar to what has been adopted in previous
years authorizing street closure for Cornucopia Days. The
Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance.
Ed White asked if there were another way to effect these street
closures for the various festivals without going to Public Works
and Council each year. It was determined that adopting the
ordinances each year is the best way. Jim Bennett commented about
possibly finding another site for the Balloon Classic so revenue is
not taken from a revenue producing facility.
Canyon Drive Barrier
Jim White stated he had been contacted by a number of citizens as
to why we did not install the jersey barriers further up Canyon.
He asked staff to look into the costs and possibility of installing
additional barriers further east on Canyon possibly up to 101st by
the high school. Wickstrom stated we could look at the project for
inclusion in the six year street program. Tom Brubaker added there
would possibly be condemnation issues to address and should be
considered as part of the costs.
Public Works Committee
June 3 , 1992
Page 5
Other
Bill Doolittle thanked the Public Works Department for being
responsive to issues he had brought before the Committee.
He asked about the status of the downtown parking ordinance.
Wickstrom stated we are still planning to go before one of the
committees of the Chamber before bringing it back to the Committee.
Ed White added this was part of our downtown parking utilization
study and we are in the process of issuing an RFP for that.
Responding to Doolittle's question about the 30-minute parking
stalls on Gowe, White responded those were a temporary measure to
respond to a merchant's request.
Jim Bennett stated a citizen had commented to him that trucks go
down to the end of James Street at Russell Road and attempt to turn
around causing the ground to slide in toward the apartments. He
asked about the possibility of making that a "no access" for large
trucks. Wickstrom responded that The Lakes have applied for a
short plat which involves extension of Lakeside Boulevard west over
to Russell Road. That section of Russell between James and the
Neely House would be turned into a recreational trail. If this
short plat materializes, that section of road could be closed in
the near future.
Jim Bennett asked about the effects of the water situation on Kent.
Wickstrom responded that Kent does not have a water problem at this
time. Our 212th water treatment facility should be on-line in July
which will add 5 MGD to our system which should give adequate
supply to get us through the summer. We also are expecting
conservation on the part of our customers because of all the
publicity. Wickstrom added that he will be meeting with King
County regarding the City's water comp plan. Because it does not
contain a formal water conservation element, King County may not
approve it. If that is so, Wickstrom stated he may be back before
the Committee requesting funds to develop and implement a
conservation plan.
Wickstrom distributed a summary of revenue received from disposing
of equipment at the auction.
Jim Bennett stated he would like to meet with all departments
involved in the equipment rental program to try to identify what
problems there are and what remedies if any are available.