HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 06/18/1991 ~~~~~
City of Kent
CNt
y Council Meetin
Agenda
CITY OF
Mayor Dan Kelleher
Council Members
Judy Woods, President
Steve Dowell Paul Mann
Christi Houser Leona Orr
Jon Johnson Jim White
Office of the City Clerk
^
`
�
}
�
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 18, 1991
Summary Agenda
MAYOR: Dan Kelleher COUNCILMEMBERS: Judy Woods, President
Steve Dowell Christi Houser Jon Johnson
Paul Mann Leona Orr Jim White
City of Kent Council Chambers
Office of the City Clerk 7 : 00 p.m.
NOTE: An explanation of the agenda format is given on the back of
this page.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. 4BLIC
BLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Community Input on Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
2 . HEARINGS
A. LID 336 - Final Assessment Roll
3 . CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes
B. Bills
C. Voters Pamphlet Participation
D. Senior Housing Street Vacation - Resolution
E. Vehicle Registration Fee/Street Utility - Resolution
F. DOT Agreement - Central Avenue
G. Russell Road Ballfield Lighting
H. Glenn Nelson Park Tot Lot
I, Golf Operational Audit
Interlocal Agreement - Fire Inspections
K. Bill of Sale - Allen Bond Kent Self Storage Facility
L. Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
None
5. BIDS
None
6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7 . REPORTS
8 . ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Community Input on Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
�-
� 1 ��� �t�-a �►
Subject: CIP INPUT AND PROCESS UPDATE
Creator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 06/12/91 at 1716.
7 ..... COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS AND COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: TONY MCCARTHY, FINANCE DIRECTOR
THE ATTACHED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM CALENDAR OF EVENTS IDENTIFIES
THE COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 18TH FOR A PRESENTATION OF THE CIP QUESTIONAIRE
RESULTS, MEETING COMMENTS AND FUNDING OPTIONS. THE ATTACHED MATERIAL
PROVIDES THIS INFORMATION. IN SUMMARY 508 QUESTIONAIRES WERE RETURNED, DOWN
FROM 644 TWO YEARS AGO. A COPY OF THE QUESTIONAIRE IS ATTACHED. RESPONDENTS
ASSIGNED A RANKING TO EACH SURVEYED AREA ON A 5 TO 1 SCALE WITH 5 BEING "NEEDED"
AND 1 BEING "NOT NEEDED" . THE SUMMARY SURVEY RESULTS ARE SHOWN FOLLOWING THE
QUESTIONAIRE. REMEMBER THE SURVEY IS NOT SCIENTIFIC BUT PROVIDES INPUT FOR
CONSIDERATION. ALSO PROVIDED IS THE SURVEY RESULTS FROM 1989 SO CHANGES CAN
BE SEEN.
ALSO INCLUDED ARE THE COMMENTS RECEIVED WITH THE QUESTIONAIRES. AS FOR THE
PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS THEY WILL BE DISTRIBUTED AT THE MEETING. THE
ATTENDANCE AT THE PUBLIC MEETINGS WAS DOWN THIS YEAR WITH 4 NON CITY PERSONNEL
ATTENDING THE EAST HILL MEETING, 10 NON CITY PERSONNEL AT THE WEST HILL MEETING,
AND 2 NON CITY PERSONNEL AT THE VALLEY FLOOR MEETING.
AS A FIRST STEP IN PREPARING A RECOMMENDED CIP FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION, THE
STAFF HAS DEVELOPED A RATING SYSTEM BASED NOT ONLY ON QUESTIONAIRE POINTS,
BUT ON "MAYOR/COUNCIL TARGET ISSUES", "DEPARTMENTAL PRIORITIES" , AND
"CONCURRANCE WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLANS" . THIS LAST SET OF POINTS IS
I ATTEMPT TO BEGIN THE PROCESS OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE OF WASHINGTON' S
GROWTH MANAGEMENT ACT. THE TOTAL OF THESE POINTS, EXCLUDING THOSE BASED ON
ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVIDE THE PRIORITY RANKING. THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
POINTS WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE TOTALS AND ARE SHOWN AS INFORMATIONAL ONLY. THIS
RANKING IS MATCHED AGAINST AVAILABLE REVENUE OVER THE SIX YEAR HORIZON TO ARRIVE
AT A FIRST CUT CIP.
THE NEXT OFFICIAL STEP AS LISTED ON THE CIP CALENDAR IS A PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE BALANCED CIP ON JULY 16TH. YOUR COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSAL AS PRESENTED
ARE SOLICITED AND DESIRED OVER THE NEXT 4 WEEKS ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS OR
IN THE FORM OF COUNCIL WORKSHOP OR COMMITTEE MEETING. YOUR COMMENTS COULD
CHANGE THE PRIORITIES, SUGGEST THE ISSUANCE OF DEBT OR A NEW REVENUE SOURCE,
OR SUGGEST THAT SOME CIP FUNDS BE RESERVED TO REDUCE THE IMPACTS OF CUTS IN
THE GENERAL FUND. ON A WEEKLY BASIS THE STAFF CIP COMMITTEE WILL BE MEETING
TO FINALIZE THE REVENUE FORECAST AND REVIEW PROJECT COST DATA TO PROPOSE
MAXIMUM UTILIZATION OF AVAILABLE RESOURSES.
1992 - 1997 CAPITAL - IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM REVISED
CALENDAR OF EVENTS 3/25/91
MEET WITH PLANNING TO DISCUSS CIP COORDINATION 2/7
DISTRIBUTE CALENDAR & OLD QUESTIONAIRE @ DEPARTMENT HEAD MEETING 2/11
DISCUSS CIP PROCESS AT IBC MEETING 2/20
DISTRIBUTE PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHEETS IN REVISED FORMAT 2/25
DEPARTMENTS COMPLETE' PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHEETS 2/25-4/15
PREPARE PRELIMINARY CIP REVENUE FORECAST .4/1
DISCUSS CIP PROCESS WITH COUNCIL AT WORKSHOP 4/2
FINALIZE CIP QUESTIONAIRE & PROCESS AT DEPARTMENT HEAD MEETING 4/8
MAIL CIP QUESTIONAIRES 4/30
PLANNING REVIEWS PROJECT DESCRIPTION SHEETS FOR CONCURRANCY 4/15-5/15
FINANCE PREPARES 6-YEAR REVENUE & EXPENSE PLAN AS REQUESTED 4/15-5/15
COMMUNITY MEETINGS' HELD 5/15-5/30
' REVIEW QOESTIONA.IRE, MEETING AND FUNDING OPTIONS WITH COUNCIL 6/18
PRESENT 9ALAN'CED. 1 M-1997 CIP.10 COUNCIL 7/16
8/6
ADOPT 1992 -1997 CIP
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURVEY/QUESTIONNAIRE
At the 1991 City Council retreat the Council developed a list of target issues.The capital related target issues
along with other issues from previous CIP cluestionaires and issues that have come up in various community meeting
are listed below for your evaluation.
Next to each statement,circle the number which best reflects your sentiments,5 meaning You think the project
Is needed ,1 meaning you think the project is not needed. Please indicate by circling"yes"or"no' whether you would
be willing to support a tax or fee increase to help accomplish the project.
DOES THE COMMUNITY NEED THE FOLLOWING? SUPPORT
NEEDED NOT NEEDED TAX FEE
IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
5::;4 ...3 2 . 1
East-Yli�st arterials yes >no Yea Oc'
North South arterials 5 4 3 .2 1 yes no yes no
Commuter rail : . 5 :<> 4 .3 ;2
Better bus service.. 5 .. 4 3 2 1 yes .no yes no
64thAvenuecompletion 5 i4 3 2 1 yes' ;na.... .......... ;
Intersection and signal improvements. 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yes no
Pavainent repair :" 5 €4 3 '2 1 yes no ... :.yes,: no ; :
Other needs
DOWNTOWN AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION
CuBuraVPerforming Arts and Convention Center 5 < 4 3 . 2 1
Improve Kent Municipal Court operations 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yes no :
bowntovvn parking;facilities 5 ` 4 3 yes ;no :yes no
Downtown pedestrian walkways (midblockj 5 4 3 2 1 yea. no yea no .
Hlatorlcpreservationfunding. 5 4 3 2 1 ;; . . Yas. no yea, na
Other needs
ENHANCE COMMUNITY SAFETY
;Expansion of Polies facilities 5 4 3 2
Continued public safety automation and communication 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yea no
Equipment tar public safety laclllties&training .. 5 4 yes';no , .. :!;yea. no ;;
Emergency fire apparatus and equipment 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yea no
Grounds maintenance building at Fire facility 5 Ii 4 3 2 1 yes nv yea no
City Correctional facility expansion 5 4 3 2 1 yea no yea no
Other needs
EXPAND RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
EastHill''park development 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yes ..fi
Interurban trail development 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yes no
Green River Trait mprovements 5 i,4 3 ':2 1 _ yes ,no yea .no';.'
Ciaik Lake park acquisition 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yes no
tce skating fac�hty:_ 5 ; 4 3..:_'12 1 . >. . . yes. no
Skateboard facility 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yes no
AddmonaI outdoor athletic complex 5 4 3 2 1 yea ;;no yea .no
Additional indoor recreation facility. 5 4 3 2 1 ea no ea no
Y y
Revitalize and update existing parks 5 I' 4 3 2 1 yea . no ';yea .in
Additional parking at parks and park facilities 5 4 3 2 1 yea no yes no
Other needs
HUMAN SERVICES COMMITMENT
Nausing'oppottunifles iorlow Income'families 5 4 3 2 1 yes:'no yea .na f
Emergency and transitional housing 5 4 3 2 1 yes no yea no
Enhanca'city employee productivity Yla automation&training 5 4 3 2 1 yes''na yea
Other needs
PRESERVE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
Preservation of streams and wetlands 5 4 3 ' 2
Preservation of critical wildlife 5 4 3 2 1 yea no yes no
Preservation of farmlands and open.spaca 5 4 3 ' 2 1 ,' yes ,no ;yea,
Improved storm drainage 5 4 3 2 1 yea no yea no
Expanded recycling Program 5 : 4 3 2 1 yes <'no yes na:a
Other needs
If increased taxes are needed to help pay for improvements,which local tax would you find least objectionable?
0 Property Tax O Utility Tax O Special Assessments O Other
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SURVEY/QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Ranking QUESTION: Results -
1 Preservation of streams and wetlands 3 .88
2 Preservation of farmlands and open space 3.86
3 Expanded recycling program 3.84
4 Commuter rail 3.75
5 East-West arterials 3.72
6 Improved storm drainage 3.67
7 Preservation of critical wildlife 3 .64
8 Better bus service 3.22
9 Pavement repair 3.17
10 North-South arterials 3.15
11 Emergency fire apparatus and equipment 3. 09
12 Intersection and signal improvements 3.03
13 Interurban trail development 2 .98
14 Expansion of Police facilities 2.97
15 Revitalize and update existing parks 2 .94
16 East hill park development 2.94
17 Green River Trail improvements 2.92
18 Housing opportunities for lower income families 2.83
19 Continued public safety automation and communications 2 .79
20 Emergency and transitional housing 2.78
21 Enhance city employee productivity through automation and train 2.69
22 Equipment for public safety facilities & training 2.63
23 64th Avenue completion 2 . 62
24 Additional parking at parks and park facilities 2.49
25 Clark Lake park acquisition 2 .38
26 Additional indoor recreation facility 2 .36
27 Improve Kent Municipal Court operations 2 .31
28 City Correctional facility expansion 2.29 --
29 Historic preservation funding 2. 19
30 Additional outdoor athletic complex 2. 19
31 Downtown parking facilities 2. 10
32 Grounds maintenance building at Fire facility 2.07
33 Cultural/Performing Arts and Convention Center 2.04
34 Downtown pedestrian walkways (midblock) 1.90
35 Ice skating facility 1.88
36 Skateboard facility 1.88
n O 0 v 0 3
<
O O v C C w n o o i n C �) _. L V .J.
�. N M1J
O l
o Ln b ^ C
w 4 D]
3 M a r O r O w J T. � Q n b Di J• n � F m U N D N S O n W '1 l r
f X b J 9 r W r p A d J
u .., .n. F
o - e. n
N [n N J •• •• - R n n N O N N 3 n 'n �O
3 •� _ < r ,r� V n n J N •C n J O w d .]. l O b J
0 = b
0 3
i n .Jpt
K
n r
- _ _ _ N N O
U U N r ._.
r +r V1 V1 W P Vt N N b n
O
J
J
O O Or
rnn .C. n D 3 d N o < N
p N L c tD n n n n J n n
i no1n7, 9
3 L m ^ ^ C b o w N a 0 0 F
J0 n A n A
U N x m 0 0 9 J n J O J F r -. n n S U A a O D• J V - n N
N ^ a n P N N 3 b 1 n D ^ n Q n 3 l < _
r r n O O r N b. ^ d N `< < n
N + a J ^ dO 1 N
C - n H N J t+ n n n
n N
N N n
r r -. N N N N ry to P P P P V R m N d W •� �
v .. N � -• W "V N V N P WNi P P V P N P G d O CP b C m O V Oo m V N
O N O W C
Dnr1n bF- „ O aG nonQ Fn< eTeN v 3 nry
0 O t nC3n To
TnCn
.N.
A A
n O
A r -. m V n
b o _ Y 3 a -ni
n a Z n 3 u n n
n o - _ oC ] a m
o N ] b n 3 - '� J o d N a
C N N n r o a ] nqq
n n o ' no ... C - ry - o J
S d L l w d n
n
N �
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N W U U W W W W W W
l� N r • N N N W I� N Vt V� P V V n O. •O O r r N W t- n j {�
N n V O D t 9 9 Z O A Z 'D = n N N T O z
O m i m 3 n N n C O d _. n n 0 p a Q ^
C R n G 'VO Y D• N V Q O C < 't N < Pq
•nN' !Si 2 1 .^ U n < �..
T i 3
i .n. s -oi o o J > < g ^ o n a + G v
y .d ti n O O
% d n J F O
O•
n ^
O G p 3 9 < l
n ] d' n 3 N �. i n -< N
< n N 3
L C
N 1
y _ ^ r p) (� r r N N N N n � N V V V '�1 Ot W •O 'Q O O � n P P N �
n
v
0
s.
a XIQlN3ddV
uol6utyseM `;ua>{ 10 /,i0 wea601d Juawanoadwj jeiideo b66L-066L
B. TARGETS: 1991-1992
The policy targets and projects identified from the Mayor and City Council's input were.
compiled and presented during the Leadership Workshop. Each item was discussed, and
key comments from this discussion were captured on the targeting worksheets. After a
complete, revised list of target issues (policy goals) was established and reviewed, the
Mayor and Council voted on the targets to establish priorities among the issues. This will
become the City's Work Plan for 1991.
The Mayor and City Council identified the following Top Priority Target Issues:
PoiN�S
S.O O 1. Improve transportation system: Improve flow and reduce congestion
4 6$ 2. Revitalize'downtown Kent
A1,3 Z 3. Enhance citizen participation and volunteerism
t3.9 6 4. Enhance community safety
3.b O 5. Expand and improve City facilities
The Mayor and City Council identified the following High Priority Target Issues:
3,ZA- 1. Maintain and enhance financial resources
Z g 2. Protect Kent's interest: Represent Kent on regional and state issues
Z.SZ 3. Expand Kent's boundary - Annexation
Z. 4. Develop park system
i.S p 5. Expand human services: Commitment and programs
I. a 6. Expand cultural and leisure opportunities
The Mayor and City Council identified the following Moderate Priority Target Issues:
1,ps L Respond to family and youth needs
Z 2. Enhance delivery of City services: Effectiveness and efficiency
;S b 3. Plan for Kent's future
1992 - 1996 CAPITAL IhPROA ENT PROGRAM
CAPITAL IFPROJDENT AND STREET RM
SLMMRY PRESENTATION
(Amxnts in Thasards)
Dedicated
Funding 1992-Bey ad
TOTAL &Prior TOTAL 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Beyrrd
EXISTING CIP RESCLRCES
Sales Tax-Capital Inprovnent 23,976 23,976 3,437 3,643 3,862 - 4,094 4,340 4,600
Real Estate Excise Tax 4,247 4,247 550 605 666 733 806 887
Interest-Capital Inp-ovarent 540 540 90 90 90 90 90 90
Loan Repayment-Capital Inprwerent 99 99 26 27 30 16
Operating Transfer-Golf Carle 840 840 140 140 140 140 140 140
Fuel Tax-Street 8,681 8,681 1,078 1,204 1,345 1,502 1,678 1,874
Vehilce Registration Tax-Street 2,146 2,146 340 347 354 362 368 375
Total Existing Resarces 40,529 40,529 5,661 6,056 6,487 6,937 7,422 7,966
PROPOSED CIP FINDING
Bad issues 3,000 3,000
Street Utility$2.00/M Ertplee & Hhld 10,418 10,418
Other Local Govement ContribAions 1,335 1,335
Transfers Fran Other Furls 985 985
State & Federal Grants/Contrituticrs 29,866 29,866
Developer/LID/Private Donations 45,387 45,387
Total Proposed FLdirg 90,991 90,991
TOTAL POTENTIAL CIP RESO..RCES 131,520 90,991 40,529 5,661 6,056 6,487 6,937 7,422 7,966
'1CILMANIC DEBT SERVICE
:amiitted Debt Payments (16,311) (16,3111)� (2,214) (2,866) (2,840) (2,818) (2,810) (2,763)
NET AVAILABLE CIP RE93YCES 115,209 90,991[24,218 J3,447 3,190 3,647 4,119 4,612 5,203
CIP EXPEFDITLRES J
Lau 1,015 1,015 1,015
Plblic Office Buildings 1,406 1,406 1,206 200
Infon nation Services 4,202 386 3,816 466 400 639 484 326 956 545
Planning 5,650 5,650 4,83 825
Police 2,346 1,147 1,199 649 350 200
Fire 4,629 4,629 1,308 1,358 821 625 275 42 200
Piblic Works 98,527 83,604 14,923 1,504 1,905 3,444 1,344 1,307 2,001 3,418
Parks 99,016 10,930 88,086 5,023 13,597 15,628 14,878 7,104 6,144 25,712
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL CIP EXPENDITLRES 216,791 96,067 120,724 15,996 18,635 20,732 17,331 9,012 9,143 29,875
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN RM BALANCE (101,582) (5,076) (96,506) (12,549) (15,445) (17,085) (13,212) (4,400) (3,940) (29,875)
BEGINNING RID BALANCE 5,565 5,076 489 489 (12,060) (27,505) (44,590) (57,802) (62,202) (66,142)
ENDING RM BALANCE
Reserved 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450
Ltreser ed (96,467) (96,467) (12,510) (27,955) (45,040) (58,252) (62,652) (66,592) (96,467)
TOTAL ENDING RM BALANCE (96,017) (96,017) (12,060) (27,505) (44,590) (57,802) (62,202) (66,142) (96,017)
City of Kent Washington Department Requests for 1992-1996 CIP 13-Jun-91
Points 92-97
Mayor PublicDept Carp. W/0 Net Proj.Cumnulat.
PROJ TITLE Council Input Rank Plan Cao/Pln Costs Totals
52 01 Corridor Improvement Fund 5.00 3.72 5.00 5.00 13.72 4,093 4,093
52 02 Central Avenue (Willis - Smith) 5.00 3.03 4.86 3.00 12.89 0 4,093
53 03 Vms Signal Computer Upgrade 5.00 3.03 4.74 12.77 28 4,121
54 D4 Central Avenue And S. 259Th Street 5.00 3.03 4.61 3.00 12.64 180 4,301
17 01 Police Computer System Upgrade 3.96 2.79 5.00 11.75 191 4,492
23 03 Refurbishment Of 1981 Aerial Truck 3.96 3.09 4.62 11.67 280 4,772
54 12 Kent Desmoines And Meeker Remodel 5.00 3.03 3.58 3.00 11.61 30 4,802
23 01 Emergency Power At Emergency Coordination Center (E.C.C.) 3.96 2.63 5.00 3.00 11.59 244 5,046
22 01 Police Library Remodel Project, Design Development Final Cost 3.60 2.97 5.00 11.57 463 5,509
54 13 Central Avenue Traffic Signal Improvement At Srl67 5.00 3.03 3.46 3.00 11.49 5 5,514
23 04 1974 Punper Replacement 3.96 3.09 4.41 11.46 316 5,830
23 02 Emergency Power For Two (2) Fire Stations 3.96 2.63 4.83 3.00 11.42 191 6,021
54 14 101St Avenue Se & Se 256Th Street 5.00 3.03 3.33 4.00 11.36 25 6,046
54 06 James Street Safety Improvements 3.96 3.03 4.35 4.00 11.34 300 6,346
15 01 Municipal Court 3.96 2.31 5.00 3.00 11.27 1,015 7,361
54 15 26OTh & 104Th Avenue Traffic Signal Installation 5.00 3.03 3.20 3.00 11.23 0 7,361
54 16 72Nd Avenue & S. 212Th Street 5.00 3.03 3.07 3.00 11.10 100 7,461
52 17 Green River Valley Transportation Ben Dis 5.00 3.15 2.94 5.00 11.09 175 7,636
52 18 Crow Road By-Pass 5.00 3.03 2.82 3.00 10.85 0 7,636
23 07 Hearing Protection/Apparatus Intercom System 3.96 3.09 3.78 10.83 45 7,681
53 20 Metro Park & Ride (Military Road) 5.00 3.22 2.56 4.00 10.78 0 7,681
22 02 Fireanns Training Simulator 3.96 2.63 4.15 3.00 10.74 55 7,736
16 02 Cityhall Campus Generator Needs 3.96 2.63 4.15 10.74 250 7,986
60 04 Scenic Hill Neighborhood Park 2.16 3.86 4.68 3.00 10.70 0 7,986
23 08 Fire Tower Burn Props 3.96 3.09 3.57 3.00 10.62 674 8,660
60 06 Matching Grant Funds 2.16 3.86 4.47 10.49 1,200 9,860
52 21 Lind Avenue (18OTh - Evh) 5.00 3.03 2.43 4.00 10.46 350 10,210
54 22 James Street & Central Avenue Right Turn Lane 5.00 3.03 2.30 3.00 10.33 250 10,460
53 05 Reiten Road/Mill Creek Canyon Erosion Control Cribbing & Rock 2.16 3.67 4.48 4.00 10.31 50 10,510
52 19 64Th Avenue (226Th - 216Th) 5.00 2.62 2.69 3.00 10.31 0 10,510
54 23 Smith & 4Th Avenue 5.00 3.03 2.18 3.00 10.21 500 11,010
54 24 Kent-Kangley Road (Sr516 & MTh Signal Interconnect) 5.00 3.03 2.05 3.00 10.08 15 11,025
22 03 "Landtrak' Geographis Information Interface To Police Compute 3.96 2.79 3.32 10.07 52 11,077
60 01 Senior Activity Center Bus 1.80 3.22 5.00 3.00 10.02 36 11,113
23 11 1985 Engine/Aid Replacement 3.96 3.09 2.94 9.99 350 11,463
54 25 Jaynes Street (94Th Avenue To 10OTh Avenue) 5.00 3.03 1.92 3.00 9.95 50 11,513
60 02 Resource Center Bus/Van With Wheelchair Lift 1.80 3.22 4.89 3.00 9.91 35 11,548
53 10 Yard Drainage Treatment 2.16 3.67 3.84 4.00 9.67 4 11,552
60 05 Riverview Park 2.16 2.92 4.58 5.00 9.66 250 11,802
18 01 Homeless Shelter For Single Men 1.80 2.78 5.00 5.00 9.58 150 11,952
52 28 72Nd Avenue 196Th-194Th Block 5.00 3.03 1.54 4.00 9.57 150 12,102
23 13 Aerial Ladder Truck 3.96 3.09 2.52 3.00 9.57 550 12,652
18 02 Critical Areas Acquisition 2.16 3.64 3.75 4.00 9.55 1,400 14,052
52 29 James Street (94Th Avenue - Jason Avenue) 5.00 3.03 1.41 3.00 9.44 1,000 15,052
52 30 Se 256Th Street Improvements - Sr516 To 116Th 5.00 3.03 1.28 4.00 9.31 950 16,002
53 07 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update 5.00 4.22 9.22 70 16,072
52 31 West Valley Highway (18OTh Street - 189Th Street) 5.00 3.03 1.15 4.00 9.18 400 16,472
22 04 Fully Equipped Undercover Surveillance Vehicle 3.96 2.63 2.49 3.00 9.08 79 16,551
23 14 Control Of Traffic For Emergency Response 3.96 2.79 2.31 3.00 9.06 180 16,731
54 32 Central Avenue & Smith Street Intersection Improvement 5.00 3.03 1.02 3.00 9.05 600 17,331
60 20 Neighborhood Parks 2.16 3.86 3.02 3.00 9.04 1,604 18,935
60 12 East Hill Community Park 2.16 2.94 3.85 3.00 8.95 1,069 20,004
23 16 Command Vehicle 3.96 3.09 1.89 8.94 42 20,046
54 33 Lincoln Avenue & James Street Signal 5.00 3.03 0.90 4.00 8.93 0 20,046
54 34 James & 104Th Acceleration Lane 5.00 3.03 0.77 3.00 8.80 150 20,196
60 23 West Hill Park 2.16 3.86 2.70 3.00 8.72 500 20,696
jh\CIPBALA1Page 1
City of Kent Washington Department Requests for 1992-1996 CIP 13-Jun-91
Points 92-97
Mayor PublicDept Comp. W/O Net Proj.Cumulat. PrVA)ukat .
PROJ TITLE Council Input Rank Plan Com/Pln Costs Totals F VW Q S
53 11 Neighborhood Traffic Control Program 5.00 3.71 5.00 8.71 120 20,816
52 35 94Th (Canyon - James) 5.00 3.03 0.64 4.00 8.67 400 21,216
60 29 First Avenue Plaza 4.68 1.90 2.08 3.00 8.66 60 21,276
60 08 Play Area Renovations/Rehabilitations 1.44 2.94 4.26 8.64 300 21,576
60 15 Green River Corridor Parking Lot 2.16 2.92 3.54 4.00 8.62 50 21,626
16 01 Police Wing Remodel 3.60 5.00 8.60 396 22,022
54 36 Se 248Th Street - 94Th Avenue To 116Th Avenue 5.00 3.03 0.51 3.00 8.54 800 22,822
60 D9 Revitalize And Update Parks 1.44 2.94 4.16 8.54 180 23,002
17 D9 City Hall Remodel - Communications Re-Wiring 3.60 2.69 2.16 8.44 61 23,063
52 37 212Th Street (Wvh - Sr167) 5.00 3.03 0.38 4.00 8.41 50 23,113
23 18 Emergency Coordination Center Operational Equipment 3.96 2.97 1.47 3.00 8.40 195 23,308
60 03 Park Maintenance Shops Remodel 3.60 4.78 8.38 80 23,388
54 38 4Th Avenue 8 Willis Street Intersection Improvements 5.00 3.03 0.26 3.00 8.29 25 23,413
23 17 Training Systems - Fire Stations And Police/Fire 3.96 2.63 1.68 3.00 8.27 48 23,461
52 39 847h Widening (212Th - Sr167) 5.00 3.03 0.13 4.00 8.16 390 23,851
23 20 Multi-Casualty Incident Trailer 3.96 3.09 1.05 3.00 8.10 56 23,907 4, -
17 02 Central Computer System Enhancements 0.72 2.69 4.68 8.08 715 24,622
53 08 Public Works Hazardous Materials Storage Building 3.96 4.10 4.00 8.06 11 24,633
18 04 Downtown Parking Garage 4.68 2.10 1.25 4.00 8.03 3,600 28,233
53 09 Spray Handling Facilities 3.96 3.97 4.00 7.93 20 28,253
60 17 Clark Lake Park 2.16 2.38 3.33 4.00 7.87 2,655 30,908
23 06 Apparatus Hoist - Apparatus Maintenance Building 0.72 3.09 3.99 7.80 189 31,097
60 32 Upper Mill Creek Canyon Acquisition 2.16 3.86 1.77 4.00 7.79 700 31,797
17 03 City Hall Training/Testing Facility: Start-Up 0.72 2.69 4.32 3.00 7.73 100 31,897
60 24 Green River Corridor Restroomrs 2.16 2.92 2.60 5.00 7.68 160 32,057
60 25 Picnic Shelters 2.16 2.94 2.50 3.00 7.60 90 32,147
22 06 Edicon Digital Photo Imagery System 3.96 2.79 0.83 7.58 150 32,297
60 11 Athletic Complex 1.44 2.19 3.95 3.00 7.58 3,750 36,047
22 05 Correction Facility - Space Study-Remodeling/Expansion Needs 3.60 2.29 1.66 7.55 400 36,447
60 10 Cultural/Performing Arts Center 1.44 2.04 4.06 5.00 7.54 20,414 56,861
60 26 Riverfront Acquisition/Development 2.16 2.92 2.39 5.00 7.47 1,500 58,361
60 36 Mill Creek Canyon Development 2.16 3.86 1.35 3.00 7.37 600 58,961
17 04 Citywide Personal Computer Upgrades 0.72 2.69 3.96 7.36 331 59,292
60 31 Titus Railroad Park Renovation 1.44 3.86 1.87 7.17 50 59,342
23 09 Vehicle Maintenance Service Vehicle 0.72 3.09 3.36 7.17 39 59,381
60 18 Kent Commons Parking 1.44 2.49 3.22 1.00 7.15 400 59,781
17 05 Personal Computer Local-Area-Networks (Lan) 0.72 2.69 3.60 7.00 400 60,181
23 05 Building And Grounds Maintenance Building 0.72 2.07 4.20 6.99 345 60,526
16 03 Old Library 3.60 3.32 6.92 500 61,026
60 41 Mill Creek Canyon Earthworks Trails 2.16 3.86 0.83 3.00 6.85 25 61,051
23 10 Fire Computer Equipment And Software 0.72 2.79 3.15 6.66 157 61,208
17 06 Geographic Information System Enhancements 0.72 2.69 3.24 6.64 80 61,288
60 44 East-West Trail 2.16 3.86 0.52 4.00 6.54 300 61,588
60 07 Park And Recreation Comprehensive Plan 2.16 4.37 6.53 100 61,688
60 46 Industrial Area Parks 2.16 3.86 0.31 3.00 6.33 400 62,088
23 12 Minitor Pagers 0.72 2.79 2.73 6.24 25 62,113
60 21 Skateboard Park 1.44 1.88 2.91 3.00 6.23 303 62,416
17 07 Capital Reserve Account 3.24 2.88 6.12 600 63,016
60 28 Additional Parking And Picnic Area At Resource Center 1.44 2.49 2.18 1.00 6.11 228 63,244
16 D4 Cityhall Alarm System 3.60 2.49 6.09 25 63,269
17 08 Automatic Telephone Call Distribution System 0.72 2.69 2.52 5.92 50 63,319
23 15 Apparatus Maintenance Building - Steam Cleaning/ 0.72 3.09 2.10 5.91 275 63,594
60 42 Green River Corridor Lights 2.16 2.92 0.73 4.00 5.81 100 63,694
60 13 Child Day Care Center 1.80 3.74 5.00 5.54 9,500 73,194
60 47 Campus C=nity Park 1.44 3.86 0.21 3.00 5.51 0 73,194
60 33 Acquire Old Safeway Building 1.44 2.36 1.66 1.00 5.46 1,683 74,877
jh\CIPBALA1Page 2
City of Kent Washington
Department Requests for 1992-1996 CIP 13-Jun-91
Points 92-97
Mayor PublicDept Camp. W/O Net Proi.Cummulat.
PROJ TITLE Council Input Rank Plan CaTVPln Costs Totals
53 26 Expand Public Works Use Of Shop 3.60 1.79 5.39 80 74,957
60 34 East Hill Community Center 1.44 2.36 1.56 3.00 5.36 5,098 80,055
53 27 Land For East Hill Shop 3.60 1.66 5.26 134 80,189
17 10 Key Telephone System Replacement 0.72 2.69 1.80 5.20 78 80,267
60 38 West Fenwick - Pave Parking Lot 1.44 2.49 1.14 3.00 5.07 65 80,332
23 19 Replace Apparatus Maintenance Service Vehicle 0.72 3.09 1.26 5.07 43 80,375
60 43 Lake Ferwick Park Improvements 1.44 2.94 0.62 5.00 200 80,575
17 11 Upgrading Telephone Voice Processing Capacity 0.72 2.69 1.44 4.84 115 80,690
60 40 Acquire American Legion Hall 1.44 2.36 0.94 4.00 4.74 901 81,591
60 39 Commons Playfield Irrigation System 0.72 2.94 1.04 4.70 130 81,721
18 03 Historic Properties Preservation 2.19 2.50 5.00 4.69 500 82,221
23 21 Fire Pump Testing Pit 0.72 3.09 0.84 4.65 0 82,221
17 12 Telephone Switch Upgrade/Expansion 0.72 2.69 1.08 4.48 0 82,221
16 06 Phase III Cityhall Remodel 3.60 0.83 4.43 200 82,421
60 14 Golf Complex Tractor-Loader 0.72 3.64 4.36 35 82,456
60 22 Premier Showmobile Portable Staging 1.44 2.81 3.00 4.25 85 82,541
23 23 Apparatus Ramp And Security Fencing 0.72 3.09 0.42 4.23 30 82,571
60 16 Park Maintenance Equipment 0.72 3.43 4.15 216 82,787
17 13 Operational Upgrades 0.72 2.69 0.72 4.12 300 83,087
60 19 Irrigate Par 3 And Driving Range 0.72 3.12 3.84 174 83,261
17 14 Emergency Backup For Central City Computer 0.72 2.69 0.36 3.76 250 83,511
60 45 Ice Skating Rink - Recreational Arena 1.44 1.88 0.42 3.00 3.74 4,863 88,374
60 35 Improve Par 3, Driving Range, Range Parking ✓t Mini Putt 2.16 1.46 3.62 2,050 90,424
60 30 Mobile Concession Stand 1.44 1.98 1.00 3.42 30 90,454
60 27 Expand Park Security Program 0.72 2.29 3.00 3.01 50 90,504
16 05 Painting of City Shops Maintenance Facility 0.72 1.66 2.38 35 90,539
60 48 New 18 Hole Golf Course 2.16 0.10 1.00 2.26 0 90,539
60 37 Electronic Readerboard 0.72 1.25 1.97 155 90,694
23 22 Paint Booth 0.72 0.63 1.35 130 90,824
23 24 Seal Coating 0.72 0.21 0.93 25 90,849
Total For Other Than Enterprize and Inter. Ser. 90,849
Prior Funding
Prior Funding and Dedicated Revenue
WATER PROJECTS
41 01 Yard Drainage Treatment 2.16 3.67 3.96 4.00 9.79 4
41 02 Public Works Hazardous Materials Storage Building. 3.96 4.68 4.00 8.63 11
41 03 Spray Handling Facilities 3.96 4.32 4.00 8.27 20
41 D4 Fencing Keats Water Sources 3.96 3.24 4.00 7.19 100
41 05 Tacoma Intertie 3.60 2.52 3.00 6.11 3,759
41 06 112Th Avarua Water Tank Painting 0.72 5.00 5.72 100
41 13 Expand Public Works Use Of Shop 3.60 0.72 4.31 80
41 09 Kent Springs Transmission Main Sr516 From 1100 Feet East Of W 0.72 3.60 4.31 2,650
41 14 Land For East Hill Shop 3.60 0.36 3.95 134
41 10 Sr516/Sr515 Watenmain Adjustment 0.72 2.88 3.59 250
41 11 Little Soos Creek Trunk Lines (Big K Addition Water Main Rep[ 0.72 2.16 2.87 155
41 12 Miscellaneous Water Improvements 0.72 1.80 2.51 1,392
41 07 Impoundment Project (124Th Ave-1187h Ave/288Th St-304Th St) 0.72 1.44 3.00 2.15 8,775
41 08 Pump Station #5 - Additional Pump 0.72 1.08 3.00 1.79 110
TOTAL FOR WATER FUND 17,530
Prior Funding
Prior Funding and Dedicated Revenue
STORM DRAINAGE PROJECTS
jh\CIPBALA1Page 3
City of Kent Washington Department Requests for 1992-1996 CIP 13-Jun-91
Points 92-97
Mayor PublicDept Comp. W/O Net Proj.Cumulat.
PROJ TITLE Council Input Rank Plan Ccmm/Pln Costs Totals
44 08 Green River Right Banc Levee Improvement 3.96 3.67 2.79 2.00 10.42 3,325
44 03 Yard Drainage Treatment 2.16 3.67 4.34 4.00 10.17 4
44 01 Public Works Hazardous Materials Storage Building. 3.96 5.00 4.00 8.96 11
44 02 Spray Handling Facilities 3.96 4.65 4.00 8.61 20
44 D4 Ulid 306/Valtey Detention 0.72 3.67 4.03 3.00 8.42 3,872
44 05 Garrison Creek Flood And Erosion Facilities 0.72 3.67 3.72 4.00 8.11 4,204
44 10 Lake Fenwick Restoration 2.16 3.67 2.17 4.00 8.00 156
44 15 Outfatl Treatment 3.60 3.67 0.62 4.00 7.89 7,029
44 06 Mill Creek Flood And Erosion Control Facilities 0.72 3.67 3.41 4.00 7.80 0
44 07 Miscellaneous Drainage Improvements 0.72 3.67 3.10 3.00 7.49 2,079
44 09 Mill Creek (Aubum)/Mullen Slough Flood Control Immprovements 0.72 3.67 2.48 3.00 6.87 652
44 11 Milt Creek Cleanup 0.72 3.67 1.86 4.00 6.25 422
44 12 Horseshoe Acres Storm Pump Station 0.72 3.67 1.55 5.94 280
44 13 Land For East Hill Shop 3.60 1.24 4.84 134
44 14 Expand Public Works Use Of Shop 3.60 0.93 4.53 80
44 16 Land For West Hill, Stockpiling Street Sweepings 3.60 0.31 1.00 3.91 75
Total for Storm Drainage 22,343
SEWER PROJECTS
44 01 Yard Drainage Treatment 2.16 3.67 3.80 4.00 9.63 4
44 02 Public Works Hazardous Materials Storage Building. 3.96 4.18 4.00 8.14 11
44 03 Mitt Creek Interceptor H2S Resolution 3.96 3.42 3.00 7.38 50
44 06 Sr515 Sewer Relocation At Garrison Creek 0.72 5.00 5.72 100
44 12 Expand Public Works Use Of Shop 3.60 1.52 5.12 80
44 08 Sewerage Comprehensive Plan Update 0.36 4.56 4.92 75
44 13 Land For East Hill Shop 3.60 1.14 4.74 134
44 11 Miscellaneous Sewer Replacements 0.72 3.04 3.76 1,062
44 04 Mitt Creek Interceptor Metering Station 0.72 2.66 3.00 3.38 50
44 05 Metro's Cross Valley Interceptor (Milt Creek Relief Sewer) 0.72 2.28 3.00 3.00 200
44 07 Little Soos Trunk Line 12000 Block To Del Webb Pumping Statio 0.72 1.90 3.00 2.62 .690
44 09 Skyline Park Sewer Interceptor 0.72 0.76 3.00 1.48 175
44 10 Meadow Hills Interceptor 0.72 0.38 3.00 1.10 400
Total for Sewer 3,031
TOTAL FCR SEWERAGE FUND 25,374
Prior Furling
Prior Furling and Dedicated Revenue
EQUIPMENT RENTAL PROJECTS
51 01 Yard Drainage Treatment 2.16 3.67 4.00 4.00 9.83 4
51 02 Public Works Hazardous Materiats Storage Building 3.96 5.00 4.00 8.96 11
51 03 City Shops Fuel Facility 3.60 3.00 6.60 40
51 04 Expand Public Works Use Of Shop 3.60 2.00 5.60 80
51 05 Lard For East Hitt Shop 3.60 1.00 4.60 134
TOTAL FOR EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND 269
GRAND TOTAL 134,022
Prior Funding
Prior Fading and Dedicated Revenue
IMPROVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM:
North - South arterials - Benson top priority
Commuter rail - King - Pierce Counties
64th Avenue completion - ????
Right hand turn lanes at every intersection
Bike lanes on new roads
Long term comprehensive mass transit system a priority
Widen Benson riddle turn lane on 208th, 240th, and 256th
East - West arterials - connect East Hill to I-5
North - South arterials - widen Benson
Commuter rail - this will only make it worse for those that do not worked
downtown Seattle
64th Avenue completion - ??
Intersection and signal improvements - remove some signals like in front of
Fred Meyer
Railroad crossings need repair
64th Avenue completion - your doing some
Commuter rail & Better bus service are circled
Don't know what the conditions are not so I feel I cannot comment on Better
bus service & 64th Avenue completion.
Commuter rail - ? what's that
64th Avenue completion - ? where is that
64th Avenue completion - Where is this?
Commuter rail - not on a city wide only basis
Commuter rail - Seattle, Puget Sound
East-West arterials & Intersection and signal improvements on East Hill
All 7 are needed. This is needed so badly that other needs simply fade in
comparison.
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 1 -
64th Avenue completion - don't know
Better bus service - James Street
East-West arterials - finish widening road from 132nd to 4 corner (Kent
Kangley Rd.)
Commuter rail - Great idea!
Better bus service - earlier for 6-2:30 shifts
64th Avenue completion - working Downtown Seattle
64th Avenue completion - West Valley Hwy.
High occupancy vehicle lanes on 167 and I-5
Get rid of the waste do it with current taxes
Repair streets in East Hill
More side walks
Finish widening road from 132nd to 4 corners (Kent Kangley Rd. )
Cross on James and Jason
Stop tax burden caused by plans for 277th construction
Finish Benson Hwy construction to four lanes from Renton to 256th
North-south arterials are the most urgent
Sidewalks on all streets - lunch time walkers are at serious risk between
Boeing and Downtown
The lights need to be timed properly. When there is no traffic coming from
three directions and the light is red for you, (the only car) it shows that
the system has a problem the new light on 212th/208th is a hazard and will be
putting a good deal more pollutants into the air.
More time to cross 4th Avenue & Willis. *signal light on 2nd & Willis
Fix Kent Kangley - we have neglected it for too long.
Please do the Benson & stop killing people
Acceleration lane entering east bound Canyon Drive. In times of low traffic,
T.A. signals are a nuisance and impede traffic (panic stops) .
Congestion is a problem developers should pay - they are over building
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 2 -
Sidewalks and bike paths
Sidewalks - ex. 212th in Valley. Bicycle lanes - ex. feeding trails. It is
sad that people have to drive to trails.
Sky pedestrian bridge for Sequoia Jr. High School and light at KK & 116th
The light at the intersection of Kent Kangley and 256th near Benson (104th or
108th) is a sever bottle neck. Something must be done with the highways
concerning this chronic traffic problem.
Pedestrian concerns - sidewalks, etc.
Sidewalks on East Hill Streets urgently needed
Install speed bumps in neighborhoods with higher volume traffic & speed
Speed bumps needed at SE 232nd and 112th PL. SE
Right turn lanes
Lighting on Benson Hwy (between 208th & 240th)
Safe bike paths connecting residential areas to Park-n-rides and existing
North/South Green River paths. Encourage use of these paths by making them
attractive and public education.
Military road from two to four lanes
East - West bike paths and interconnection of bike routes to facilitate
commuting by bike
Add sidewalks & widen 108th Ave. to four or more lanes up to 267th
Sidewalk
Bicycle path completion under Hwy 167
Synchronize signals especially on arterials - East Valley/West Valley Hwy.
Rubber at railroad track crossings
Efficient Design of roadways/enhancing bicycle commuting roadways,
intersections, etc. - less taxation - more
No more apartments. Too much over build as w/comm bldg. Keep Kent a family
oriented community.
Railroad crossings on Willis
Restrict out of area traffic from passing through Kent
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 3 -
Smooth railroad crossings
Benson Hwy.
Adjust the signals to fix the traffic
Kent needs East/West Hwy like Auburn's Hwy 18.
Demand lights at all heavy intersections
Pedestrian & bicycle traffic voluntary contribution
Designate one lane Hoven Valley Hwy &/or 104th
Need signal light on Meeker where Sherri 's eating place is you sit waiting to
get out
Block off some roads that cross Main Rd. Road exit lanes going into shopping
centers
Use the gas tax that we have been paying for year that was to be used on road
improvements
Commuter rail is high on my list. I want to stop driving.
Right turn lane, top of Kent - Des Moines Rd. , 1 bike east of I-5
Road repair
Drainage in some areas
Finish widening Benson, widen Meeker from W. galley to Kent - Des Moines Rd.
Make some tours more accessible by removing traffic signals
Reduce number of City employees - use savings to pay for improvements
Remove speed bumps on 40th Ave. S. in Cambridge - stupid enforcement too
Better transportation to and from Boeing Plants and shows on E. Hill and W.
Hill and Renton
Buses should run between Auburn, Kent, Renton, etc. no interest in going to
Seattle.
Repairs on W. Valley haven't helped
DOWNTOWN AND COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION:
Improve Kent Municipal Court operations - don't know
Downtown parking facilities - If rail service is available
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 4 -
Downtown parking facilities - encourages trade locally
Cross on James and Jason
Maintain present operations
What we don't need is to listen to the Mayor and others who continually pitch
for the redevelopment of Downtown. We are blessed to have it as it is so I
defy you to find one owner or tenant asking that Downtown be redeveloped.
Unless it generates money so taxes are not needed
More concerts at Mill Creek Friday evenings - No exceptions, if they are held
every week, attendance will increase. Please annex E. Hill and build 277th
St. Corridor.
Large street trees are counter productive. They destroy concrete areas make
for costly maintenance, damage property and hide signs to bring in needed
customers
Honest politicians fewer City employees with fancy titles
How come Kent does not have a shopping mall?
No Kent City Jail , stop kicking existing business out.
Drainage - City has collected fee for over the years and so far no improvement
in drainage - ex. pump stations - channel improvement to move water out of
Valley.
Need a Performing Arts Center nRt a Convention Center.
More savings of tax money to cover future shortages.
Some unifying theme
Finish sides of buildings on walkway from 1st to Post Office
We need to preserve our historic sites and we need a Performing Arts Center.
Rebuild Downtown on a theme basis paid for by Downtown land owners
Get half-assed tenants out, get good, anchor businesses in
New library was not necessary, old library shelves, aren't full - how do you
expect to fill more shelves - raise taxes for books? Keep videos out of
library!
Increase Convictions
Augment street I .D. and address system as proposed years ago by Fire Chief
Tom Foster! !
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 5 -
Sidewalks on many Downtown streets
Keep it down
ENHANCE COMMUNITY SAFETY:
Cross on James and Jason
? on Equipment for public safety facilities and training, Emergency fire
apparatus and equipment, Grounds maintenance building at Fire facility, City
Correctional facility expansion
Use seized drug money to fund police and fire department.
Expand community education
No jail downtown
Question on all categories of this section on questionnaire.
Let the prisoners out to the grounds to do some work or the homeless people
next to the Labor Agency in Kent.
Additional manpower both police and fire
There is a need for more policemen to cover the amount of people in Kent.
Equipment for public safety facilities & training, Emergency fire apparatus
and equipment, Grounds maintenance building at Fire facility, City
Correctional facility expansion - OK
Improve animal control ! East Hill & Scenic Hill dogs are noisy and messy!
Grounds maintenance building at Fire facility - what do firemen do when not on
a fire?
Hospital (Renton has one, Auburn has one, Federal Way even has one now - when
will Kent? With the traffic the way it is on the East Hill you can't make it
to any of these in less than 20-30 minutes) .
Expansion of Police facilities - West Hill
Require bike license and training course to operate same within city limits.
Reduce spending on above items
Equipment for public safety facilities & training - what?
Grounds maintenance building at Fire facility - use volunteers
Keep out of Kent any related correction facility.
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 6 -
Questions - Expansion of Police facilities, Continues public safety automation
and communication, Equipment for public safety facilities & training,
Emergency fire apparatus and equipment.
For police - less emphasis on traffic patrol more emphasis on neighborhood and
school patrol
City Correctional facility expansion - we have on jail , let someone else do
the next one. Downtown Kent won't be revitalized with a jail .
Hire professionals to head departments
Keep it down
Expansion of Police facility - already in process?
Questions - Continued public safety automation and communication, Equipment
for public safety facilities and training, City Correctional facility
expansion. Grounds maintenance building at Fire facility - concrete.
EXPAND RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES:
Set aside more land while it still is available!
Police and clean-up exiting facilities
Do not let green belts be used for new construction
Mark parking spaces at parks wider - need room to open doors - not just park!
Expand indoor park program -- more days, more equipment, bigger area.
Greenbelts
Youth Center
Should be privately-owned not state, city, etc.
Outdoor public swimming pool
Sidewalks so people can walk safely in Kent.
Less parking and more non-automotive access
Additional indoor recreation facility - ice skating
East Hill park development - Clark Lake and others
Additional indoor recreation facility - East Hill
Kent Commons fitness trail across the street no. needs repaving
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 7 -
Bicycle lanes on arterial roads
Indoor/outdoor swimming facility
A decent indoor swimming pool/wading pool/jacuzzi - look into Oak Harbors
facility they did it right.
Increased Park Maintenance. Lake Fenwick area gets lots of trash.
Additional outdoor athletic complex - includes tennis
West Hill , Glen Nelson Park Tennis facilities are in need of your attention.
Lighting at West Fenwick tennis facilities would be appreciated. (coin
operated)
Youth work opportunities - paid for assisting needy elderly at home. Yard
work.
A comment for all areas of Expand Recreational Opportunities - Barney has
plenty!
Ice skating facility - definitely
Radio control aircraft - boats - cars - at area on 124th
More parking at Central Park
Interurban trail development, Green River Trail improvements, Clark Lake park
acquisition - do not know of these areas - cannot comment
There is plenty going on in the way of amusement. Skateboard facility - we
need to enforce laws to keep pedestrians safe from sidewalk
Skateboarders/cyclists. Our family has had several close calls, by careless
teens on skateboards and bikes. Could we make it safe for pedestrians and
still let the kids have their fun, too? How about a fenced lane for
bikes/skateboards? I'm only 32 - but I'm having difficulty dodging the
activity. I'm sure it's a real nightmare for frantic fragile senior citizens.
East Hill Park should be a big clear area for better protection of children
East Hill park development - What? Where?
Additional outdoor athletic complex - have many parks
Ball field drainage Kent Commons Park
Establish and enforce strict operation code for cyclists in Kent and on
walking/bike trails. Many rides are a threat to pedestrians.
Large softball complex
These are frills
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 8 -
Commons Parking
Developers should fund parks for apartments they build
Bike trails East to West
Block roadways/right of ways
Do the ice skating, skateboard in one facility - enough parks in Kent
Ice skating facility - no way! Skateboard facility - might help
Repave Commons Park trail too wet
Secure some parks - ex. swim suggestion: charge a small entry fee at the
beaches. They do this in Europe.
Clarke Lake Park acquisition - ??
Revitalize and update existing parks - Fenwick
Walk and you won't need parking - additional parking at parks and park
facilities.
Interurban trail development - for bike commuting
Additional outdoor athletic complex - East Hill . Keep trees on all hills
(slopes) and waterways
Bike and foot trails
More security at parks
Our spending for parks is already excessive
Lawfully use forward thrust funds for Indoor Shooting Range
Keep it down
East Hill park development - Clark Lake
We need some local public swimming pool
East Hill park development - paid for by local residents who use it.
Interurban trail development - what year?
Green River Trail improvements - for how many years?
Clark Lake park acquisition - don't know about this
Ice skating facility - where?
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 9 -
Revitalize and update existing parks - for more drug abuse?
Kent can't accommodate the residential parking problems, how can you
accommodate more parking for parks, residential comes first?
HUMAN SERVICES COMMITMENT:
Why do you even have to ask these questions?
City Employees don't work now why waste the money
Stop building apartments that people can't afford
Low income for seniors housing
Help low income elderly food - heat - transportation
Monitor long breaks taken by motorized city employees
We have our share of low income units
Housing for single men. Increase H.S. budget line
Emergency and transitional housing - if used as such
Employees should possess the standards already to be productive
Community Communication System. See "Express" Service on the TCI Cable. If a
city could include an overlay into that system, people could be informed about
what's going on through a different means of communication.
Better living conditions for the people who already live here
Does the City need to duplicate county and state services?
You can enhance City employees productivity by getting a full days work out of
them.
Crossing James and Jason
? on all 3 areas
If City employees are not trained - do not hire in first place.
Housing opportunities for low income families - encourage private sector/tax
credits
Shelter for Victims of domestic violence
City employees seem to do pretty well with whatever they have
Shorten coffee breaks
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 10 -
Government should not spend money housing underwriting
Need to revise entire welfare services
Enhance city employee productivity via automation & training - employees
responsibility
Reduce number of city employees and use money saved for above needs
Work release facility
Kent has more than our share of low and transitional type housing - put them
up North East side.
More training on the computers to know all the capabilities !
Seems too many City employees on a job - 2 working, 2 standing! !
Decrease pleasure to work
Apartments provide enough low income housing through housing grants. (Fed)
Start using City employees to do things presently farmed out to consultants! !
Keep it down
Should be a given!
Ratings for employees
PRESERVE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT:
Preservation of farmlands and open space - You have already raped this
resource there is nothing left.
We need to preserve as much as we can before its too late
Preservation of critical wildlife - ?
City 200?
Preservation of streams and wetlands - this is 2 questions
More curbside recycling
Improved storm drainage - on 100 Ave. South of 208th St. also speed bumps
Cut down cottonwood trees on slope between Sconiceway and Central Ave. South
before they get any bigger and fall .
Buy land don't zone it at a owner's expense
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 11 -
Expanded recycling program - to include an incorporated cut!
Air Quality
Improved storm drainage - stop paving! ! Control growth.
Expanded recycling program - This is a big must! ! We need curbside recycling
We are paying for drainage now, let us see results.
We should have curbside recycling in Kent.
Help businesses with recycling
Cross James and Jason
Improved storm drainage - does it need it?
Expanded recycling program - this should pay for itself
Flooding here is very bad!
Could be handled through zoning, not taxes
Expanded recycling program - doesn't need taxes could be self supporting.
It should cost less.
Would like to see this mandatory
Improved storm drainage - desperately!
Try getting a long with what money you have got.
Trim the fat!
Improved storm drainage - we already pay a fee for improved drainage no
improvement.
Save money, concerve and lower taxes.
Preservation of critical wildlife - what's critical
Preservation of farmlands and open space - too late!
Improved storm drainage - can't get it right!
What is critical wildlife, does it affect incomes of its poor, unemployed,
welfare, etc.
I will support wetlands and wildlife if people are adequately compensated for
their land.
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 12 -
Preservation of streams and wetlands - City must buy the property
Stop development of farmlands and open space - stop the runaway apartment
building that is ruining Kent
Prevent dumping of debris on wetlands along Interurban Trail
Expanded recycling program - should pay for itself
Let King County do it!
Would not vote for anything in the City of Kent. Get rid of the Mayor and his
cohorts.
Expanded recycling program - already very good
Issue no building permits
Fire all metermaids put money into improving transportation of Seattle bums.
Back to Seattle.
Preservation of farmlands and open space - by using common sense
A little late with this
We are already paying for this and not getting it.
Use drainage fees that we pay now.
Need more coyotes in the City to control rats and possums
Compensate Property Owners for property rights stollen.
Keep it down
Expanded recycling program - adequate now
Improved storm drainage on West Valley
Expanded recycling program already in effect.
MISCELLANEOUS:
A reduction in taxes for senior citizens
Some of these things may be needed but our taxes just went up far too high
already - use funds more wisely.
Divert funds from Kent City Limit Expansion Plans
Park tax
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 13 -
State income tax with Kent getting fair share
Multi dwelling taxes and developer's tax home owner's shouldn't have to bear
everyone's tax burden
Stop the building of apartment complexes
Sales
Bonds
Fuel for Roads
Gas Tax
City sales tax
Useage tax
Don't know
Income tax
Alcohol , tobacco, & gas
Tax corporations in Kent more heavily!
User fee or luxury tax
Income & user fee
None too high now for services received
All are objectionable
Stop growth on East Hill stop multi family apt. , condo's etc. make it a place
to be proud of! ! The tax's and fee's are starting to price most families out
of their homes.
Sales tax so all share!
Whatever it takes!
Condemn trees, order property owners to remove or insure to cover damage.
Obtain the funding from the developers of the apartment jungles that have been
allowed to spoil our City and outgrow City facilities and roads.
Taxes on apartment residents
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 14 -
Existing budget
Impact fees
User fees
No more taxes
My overall comment and concern for 1991 and improvements deals with the
literally uncontrolled industrial expansion of the Kent Valley floor and the
literally uncontrolled residential expansion of Kent's East Hill which are
flooding our highways with vehicular traffic and our schools with students.
It is apparent to me that the Kent City Council 's first priority is
pro-expansion with little thought or planning for the movement of people (our
transportation system) or the reasonable accommodation of increased children
in our schools. I am gravely concerned about this, and personally pay a
price each day for increased transportation time and the overcrowding affect
of schools on my children.
Income Tax at State level
Income tax
Sales tax
A combination of the three - Property tax, Utility tax, & Special Assessments
No more taxes
No new taxes
Head tax, tax for these purposes must include everyone - not just property
owners.
Stop issuing building permits at every green spot and wetland in the valley
and hills!
No new taxes!
Keep within budget!
No money - no new projects!
It appears that the homeowners will foot the bill - wrong - Keep with budget
no money - no project!
Apartment dwellers tax and special assessments
Permits/Licenses
None - better use of the money you have
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 15 -
New developments should pay a higher tax
Bond issue. City needs to spend less and act more financially responsible.
Please, no more retreats !
When I moved here 27 years ago my City taxes were $76.00. Now my City taxes
are $317.40 and the City is no better!
User-specific taxes/fees taxes on first home in area purchased
Development/Building tax
Business and developers fees/tax
You're not funding schools who have to assist these needy folks.
Business and industry profits
Luxury items taxes ex. beer, cigarettes & video rental
Fix the transportation problem NOW, quit talking about it! ! ! I'm just as
tired as you are of me having to drive through downtown Kent.
No! ! ! Use the money you already have.
Any tax increase is objectionable.
Undecided
Increase City limits to increase tax base
Tax which would effect Kent's growing apt./townhouse renting population as
well as homeowners.
No taxes - reduce taxes
Users fees ex. bicycle license, parking meters at lot at Parks and trails
Bond and or sales tax
Now new taxes! Reallocate the taxes that are now collected.
No tax increase - escalated property values provide sufficient funds.
The only problem is Kent is flooding! !
Multiple options
Sales Tax
Spend what you have wisely! No need for more in this growing community.
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 16 -
Sales tax
Income tax
Actually better and more prudent use of existing taxes would pay for most
projects.
Sales tax
Income tax
Each item should pay for itself by users - all before voters.
Sales tax
Reallocation of funds now available
Not sure
Taxes not needed
Reduce services
Where does all the current gas tax we pay go?
Tax all resident's equally
Sales tax
No new taxes! ! Use the money from taxes more efficiently! !
Tax Boeing
We do not want anymore apartments downtown Kent.
Combination of all 3, with use determining method of fund raising - Property
tax, Utility tax, and Special assessments.
All are obnoxious
No new taxes needed - lower existing taxes. How? Reduce spending.
High Interest Bonds
Income tax
Reaccess and budget better present revenue
Income tax
Downtown businesses should buy more parking
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 17 -
Occupants should have to pay higher fines
The state gives low income housing subsides let them pay.
You are taxing people right out of their homes. Try better management of
money.
One gripe I have is the lack of professionalism and courtesy by public
employees. They seem to forget we (Joe public) pay their wages and a. city job
is not their god given right. It is not too hard, (when your customer service
position) to acknowledge someone at the counter, say a nice word, I'll be
right with you. I have been to City Hall to see the police and that was the
worst case of rudeness I have yet to see. You might go down to Lewis Co. emp.
and take notes. It was refreshing to have them nod, hold up a finger, I'll be
right with you or just acknowledge that there was another person in the same
room. People get your act together!
You are taxing people right out of their homes. Try better management of
money.
We don't like the emphasis on growth! Damn the apartment builders!
Multi family buildings tax
Better management of funds already paid or collected
In my household we have to earn to pay all the bills with the money we have.
It's called balancing the budget. The amount of taxes we pay for property,
excise tax, etc. should be sufficient!
Tax developers who have made this necessary.
None
Tax new development and developers
Get rid of waste in City Hall !
Government - of the City of Kent - is outrageously wasteful of public money
when you can provide basics you can build back public buildings! ! !
Get a grip on reality mayor! ! !
Why should you have to ask for more taxes? I'm paying almost $300.00 more
property taxes this year than last year. What is happening to the money? And
I'm only one person multiplied by 5 million or more?
User tax
Bond issues
No new taxes at all
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 18 -
None
Get rid of the Mayor and his cohorts
No taxes
User fee
Oppose raising taxes
By adding this question it is obvious you have decided to raise my taxes
regardless of the survey results. (very last survey question)
Seek grants and matching funds
Cut City Administrator wages.
No more taxes $500 increase in one year is too much.
Local graduated income tax
One time special for specific project
Tax the developers
Sales
None
No new taxes
City needs to be held accountable for what they already receive in revenues
before any increases in taxes.
All apartment dwellers and non-residents who trave through Kent should be
taxed.
No taxes
User fee
No more taxes
Tax apartment dwellers
Local sales tax, property tax is unfair to homeowners. We'd be funding
improvements for apartment dwellers.
No more taxes, please! ! !
No more taxes! ! !
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 19 -
Over taxed already! !
No tax - use what exists wisely
Absolutely no tax increases. Make developers pay or users pay.
Fire a number of City Employees. Monitor work effort of others.
Please no more apartments.
Sales tax
Eliminate outrageous sewer bill !
Income tax
User fee
I think we are taxed enough. Put a fee on for people who use them to pay for
it.
User fees - permits, etc.
I will consider this when they expect delays April through January sign near
188th SW Valley finally comes down and W. Valley is a finished, smooth,
driveable surface instead of a roller coaster bumpy ride from south of 190th
through Kent. That sign has been there for 3 years.
Spread it out so everyone pays.
Not familiar with all issues.
1335F-09F (6/6/91) - 20 -
Kent City Council Meeting
Date
Category Public Hearings
1. SUBJECT: L.I.D. 336
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the public
hearing on the final assessment roll for L. I.D. 336. The City
Clerk has given the proper legal notification to the property
owners. The Director of Public Works will review the scope of
the project and the manner of assessment.
3 . EXHIBITS: vicinity map and memorandum from the Public Works
Director
h np
4 . RECOMMENDED BY. f
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO /� YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT•
CLOSE HEARING:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
the hearing be closed a the ty Attorney be directed to
prepare the ordinance con ing the final assessment roll for
L. I .D. 336.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
June 13, 1991
TO: Mayor\Kelleher and City Council
FROM: Don W` Wiickstrom
RE: Proposed LID 336 East Valley Highway Widening
From S. 192nd St. to S. 180th St.
No protests were received opposing the formation of the LID. LID
336 was formed by Council Ordinance No. 2977 on April 2 , 1991.
BACKGROUND
This project provides for the widening of East Valley Highway from
S. 192nd St. (just south of Springbrook Creek) to S. 180th St. This
is the last remaining link of the original East Valley Highway from
Auburn to Renton, through Kent, that has not been widened to five
lanes. Currently, the roadway pavement has deteriorated in many
places and is in need of major overhaul. In addition, the capacity
of the two lane road has been stretched beyond its reasonable
limit. The number of left turning vehicles to adjoining businesses
and properties, result in significant backups nearly any time of
the day.
In 1988 , the City of Kent requested funding from the State
Transportation Improvement Board to help pay for a portion of the
cost of the proposed improvement. A commitment of funds was
received from that Board approximately one year ago, and the
schedule outlined in that grant request was to have construction
commence in 1991.
Much of the area is already developed with a few remaining
undeveloped areas. A number of the undeveloped parcels have
development plans currently in the works.
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
The proposed improvement is to complete the missing link of five
lane arterial between S. 192nd St. and S. 180th St. Currently,
East Valley Highway is five lanes in width, both north and south of
this project area. The completed roadway cross-section will look
similar to East Valley Highway, southerly of S. 192nd St. The
roadway will include curb and gutter, concrete sidewalks along both
sides, a five lane wide roadway which includes a two-way left turn
lane in the center, street lighting on both sides of the street,
street trees on both sides of the street, a storm drain system and
bioswale system between the curb and sidewalk.
Proposed LID 336 East Valley Highway Widening
June 13 , 1991
Page 2
The project will also include extending sanitary sewer and water
stubs to undeveloped properties adjacent to the roadway section.
NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS
Street Widening - Without question, the street needs to have
capacity improved. A two way left turn lane is needed to allow
safe movement of trucks and left turning vehicles to the numerous
adjoining businesses, driveways, and truck distribution centers on
either side of the roadway.
Additional street lighting is needed beyond the few existing street
lights to bring the arterial up to current requirements for
adequate street lighting.
Continuous sidewalks are also needed to integrate to the sidewalk
system at both ends of the project. Sidewalks will allow for safe
pedestrian access along the roadway and help provide for passenger
use of METRO transit along this route.
The drainage system in the area needs to be improved. The proposed
curb and gutter, swale and storm drain system will help alleviate
some of the drainage problems in the area. However, it should be
understood that due to the overall low-lying nature of the entire
valley floor in this area it will not be possible with this street
widening project to completely eliminate the type of flooding that
has occurred in this region sporadically over the years.
Utilities that are currently within the roadway will be extended to
serve undeveloped or underdeveloped properties so that the new
street will not have to be tunneled underneath to provide for these
facilities in the future.
A large number of the properties within the assessment area for
this project have recently developed and have already agreed to
participate in this LID project.
PROJECT FUNDING AND ASSESSMENT DISTRIBUTION
The project funding is primarily from the Local Improvement
District, with 10% of the project cost funded from City Funds, and
26% from the State Transportation Improvement Board grant funds. In
the proposed Local Improvement District 336, each parcel is
assessed a share of this cost based on two zones.
Proposed LID 336 East Valley Highway Widening
June 13 , 1991
Page 3
Zone 1 is the front footage assessment and is prorated over the
front 300 feet of property abutting the East Valley Highway
improvements. The costs of pavement, storm drainage, curb and
gutter, sidewalks, and street lighting are included in Zone 1.
These costs represent approximately 80% of the project.
The costs for the addition of the two-way left turn lane are
included in Zone 2 and are approximately 20% of the project. Zone
2 costs are distributed over the entire area of all parcels within
the LID on a square foot basis.
Total of LID Assessments $2 , 280, 637
City/State TIB Funding 1 , 250, 000
Project Total $3 , 530, 637
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Bids were opened on May 24 , 1991. Gary Merlino Construction Co.
was the low bidder at $2 , 587, 703 . 45 . The low bid was very close to
the Engineer ' s estimate, therefore the final assessment roll amount
is the same as the preliminary roll amount.
Construction is estimated to start June 24 , 1991 and be completed
in late Fall of 1991, weather permitting.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
After City Council passes the ordinance confirming the final
assessment roll, there is a 30 day period in which any potion or
all of the assessment can be paid with no interest charges. After
that 30 day period, the assessments will be paid over a 15 year
period wherein each annual payment is 1/15th of the principle plus
interest on the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the
municipal bond market dictates at the time the bonds are sold.
11T.I. is �I+TT1T
jLl
tDl
m ® o ® r
a� T
z
O � .
41-3
I '
WE Y/Y JJ l r
35
r
rr
NT.S.
LP
w
1 .01
e
ri
i
Z 1
-i 'ICI f l f 1
I' I �uuMbEL�T �
' 1
�. 1�14T+4 ST. I z7
rJ
L. 1.17. 33 �
EAST VA•LLw%l N1yHW�`�
EOM S. 11Z� S'T.
1.0
j'o y
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
Councilmember_ Pp'_ moves, Councilmemb
seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through Labe approved.
Discussion
Action
103A� Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
June 4 , 1991
3B. Approval of Bills.
r Approval of payment of the bills received through June 14 , 1991
after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at
4 : 45 p.m. on June 25, 1991.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Council Agenyla/
Item No. 3 A-B
Kent, Washington
June 4 , 1991
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers Dowell,
Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr, White and Woods, City Administrator
Chow, City Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris, Public
Works Director Wickstrom, Assistant City Administrator Hansen,
Police Chief Crawford, Fire Chief Angelo. Information Services
Director Spang was excused from the meeting. Finance Director
McCarthy, Personnel Director Olson and Parks Director Wilson were
not in attendance. Approximately 50 people were at the meeting.
PUBLIC Police Chief. Mayor Kelleher presented Ed
COMMUNICATION Crawford, Kent's new Police Chief, with the
Chief ' s Badge and welcomed him to the City. He
noted that refreshments will be served after the
meeting in honor of Chief Crawford, and invited
all to attend and meet him.
Employee of the Month. Mayor Kelleher announced
that Geary Murray of the Police Department Detec-
tives Division has been selected as June ' s
Employee of the Month. He noted that Murray is
praised by his fellow employees for his positive,
courteous attitude and that his dedication to the
job goes far above and beyond the call of duty.
Chief Crawford congratulated Detective Murray, and
he was presented with the Employee of the Month
plaque.
Kent Community Health Center Week. The Mayor read
a proclamation declaring the week of June 10-14 ,
1991, as Kent Community Health Center Week and en-
couraged all citizens to acknowledge the contribu-
tions of the Kent Community Health Center to the
health and welfare of Kent ' s citizens. He pre-
sented the proclamation to Dr. George Heffner, who
thanked the City for their support.
CONSENT WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through
CALENDAR H be approved. Mann seconded and the motion car-
ried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of
the regular Council meeting of May 21, 1991.
HEALTH & (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
SANITATION Kent East Corporate Park Phase I. ACCEPTANCE of
the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted
1
June 4 , 1991
HEALTH & by Kent I Limited Partnership for continuous oper-
SANITATION ation and maintenance of approximately 4 , 658 feet
of water main extension and 1, 269 feet of sanitary
sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of S .
218th Street and the East Valley Highway for Kent
East Corporate Park and release of cash bond after
expiration of the one-year maintenance period.
WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
Joint Use Reservoir. AUTHORIZATION to transfer
$60, 000 from the Unencumbered Water Fund and to
execute the agreement for purchase of Water Dis-
trict ill ' s equity in the Joint Use Reservoir, as
approved by the Public Works Committee.
STREETS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
Van Doren's Landing Segregation. ADOPTION of
Resolution 1264 segregating Assessments 45 and 46
of L. I. D. 327 as approved at the Council meeting
of May 21, 1991.
PUBLIC (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
WORKS Combined Storm Water Detention/Enhanced Wetland
Facility. The final report on the Combined Storm
Water Detention/Enhanced Wetland Facility has now
been completed and includes the recommendation for
preferred plan for construction and preliminary
construction costs. The study was funded through
a grant from the Department of Ecology. In order
to finalize the report and receive the remainder
of the grant funds, it is necessary to transmit a
signed copy of the final report to DOE by the end
of June.
The Public Works Committee has reviewed the final
report and recommends acceptance of the report and
authorization for the Mayor to sign the final re-
port.
Public Works Director Wickstrom noted that this
project is a key element in solving the flooding
and water quality problems in the Mill Creek
Basin. He also pointed out that the area was
classified as a unique and fragile area in the
1980 Valley Studies, and that wildlife habitat
must be preserved. He explained that the cost of
the project is approximately $141000, 000 and that
2
June 4 , 1991
PUBLIC half is to be paid by a ULID within the area and
WORKS the other half by the storm drainage utility over
a three year period. Upon Dowell 's question, he
noted that the drainage utility is a tax on
impervious surfaces and that the cost is currently
approximately $2 . 50 a month. He said that the
increase during the first year would be about 76
cents. He noted for Johnson that the project
includes 36 . 5 acres for detention facilities and
15. 5 acres for pretreatment ponds, and that the
pretreatment ponds could be expanded. He noted
for Dowell that the original lagoon was on 65
acres and that the final project will be 101
acres.
Dowell asked whether the wetlands facility and
construction on 64th Avenue South could be done at
the same time, so as not to disrupt wildlife
twice. Carol Stoner of the Environmental
Committee explained that the pump dredge must be
done in the winter, and construction on 64th
Avenue must be done during the spring and summer.
She said that hopefully the buffer will be in
place when road construction begins so that the
disruption is only one season.
WHITE MOVED that the final report on the Combined
Storm Water Detention/Enhanced Wetland Facility be
accepted and the Mayor be authorized to sign same
for transmittal to the Department of Ecology.
Woods seconded. White noted that this project de-
monstrates that the environmental community and
the development community can work well together.
The motion carried.
SHORELINE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
MASTER Shoreline Master Program Amendments. ADOPTION of
PROGRAM Resolution 1283 approving the Shoreline Master
AMENDMENTS Program Amendments as discussed at the City Coun-
cil meeting on May 21 .
SENIOR (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
HOUSING Senior Housing Project. The Mayor noted that this
item consists of three parts:
I . Authorization to enter into a preliminary
agreement between the Bellewood Corporation and
the City of Kent for development of the Senior
3
June 4 , 1991
SENIOR Housing Project. The agreement conditionally
HOUSING accepts the proposal, developer and architect and
further authorizes the Administration to negotiate
with the developer a final site plan, performance
specifications and a final Contract for Sale of
the Senior Housing Project.
II . Passage of an ordinance accepting the agree-
ment between the Housing Authority of King County
and the City of Kent for the development, owner-
ship and operation of the Senior Housing Project
and authorizing execution of the Housing coopera-
tion Agreement.
III . Endorsement of the Support Services package
as outlined by the Kent Senior Housing Support
Services Committee in the Framework for a Support
Services Package.
Assistant City Administrator Hansen pointed out
that in 1990, voters approved a $6 . 7 million bond
issue for this project. Mayor Kelleher relin-
quished the gavel to Council President Woods in
order to make part of the presentation and parti-
cipate in the discussion. He then explained that
a competitive negotiation process was used for
this project, and that under this process site se-
lection, design, and selection of the contractor
are all included in one proposal . He noted that
the proposals received were evaluated and ranked
by a committee, and that the top ranked team nego-
tiates a contract with Administration. He ex-
plained the criteria used for site selection and
design of the project. Woods pointed out that she
and Orr were not on the committee at the time the
proposals were ranked.
City Attorney Lubovich noted that, among other
things, the Preliminary Agreement authorizes Ad-
ministration to continue negotiations and develop
final contract documents which will come back to
Council for approval before execution. He ex-
plained that under the Housing Cooperation Agree-
ment, the City is responsible for the developing
and furnishing of the facility and that upon com-
pletion title will be conveyed to the Authority,
who will maintain and operate the project. Morgan
Llewellyn, owner of Rasmussen & Associates Real
4
June 4 , 1991
SENIOR Estate, stated that he had been retained by the
HOUSING Harader Mebust Group to locate a site in Kent. He
introduced Dean Chaussee, President of The Belle-
wood Corporation, who told of their experience
with this type of project. The architect, Tom
Harader, outlined his firm' s experience and
displayed a drawing of the facility. Janet Shull
of the Planning Department noted that the Senior
Housing Support Services Committee has developed
the framework for the Support Services package
which includes meal services, housekeeping,
laundry/linen, personal care, health and social
services, activities/social program, beauty/barber
and transportation. She stated that hopefully the
facility will serve the needs of frail seniors and
that it will continue to house seniors as they
age, so that they will not have to move. She
noted that the committee will continue to work
with the Authority and will later make a final
recommendation to the Council .
HOUSER MOVED to authorize City Administration to
enter into a Preliminary Agreement to Contract for
Sale between The Bellewood Corporation and the
City of Kent in a form substantially similar to
the agreement in the Council packet and further
authorizing City Administration to negotiate with
the developer a final site plan, performance spec-
ifications and Contract for Sale. White seconded.
Lubovich clarified for Dowell that the City will
give title to the property and the building to the
King County Housing Authority, but that there is a
right of re-entry to obtain the title back. He
also noted that there is a 90-day termination pro-
vision. Dowell questioned whether a 90-day period
is enough time to take over the operation of the
facility if the County were to turn it over to the
City. He verified for Mayor Kelleher that he
feels the time period for terminating without
cause should be longer in this agreement and also
in the Housing Cooperation Agreement. The Mayor
assured him that extending the time period would
not present any difficulty. Upon Dowell ' s ques-
tion, Harader noted that parking for each unit is
not necessary, that 50% parking is adequate.
Lubovich noted for Dowell that the $1, 000, 000 lia-
bility insurance policy is standard, but that it
could be increased. The Mayor asked that the Risk
5
June 4 , 1991
SENIOR Analyst determine whether $1, 000, 000 is sufficient
HOUSING coverage for 92 people.
Upon Dowell ' s question regarding fire flow, Fire
Chief Angelo noted that there is more than enough
fire flow at 4th and Meeker. He added that if
development downtown is continued, the water
system will need to be improved. The Mayor noted
that if the fire flow were not enough, the
building would have to be built to a higher
standard, which would cost approximately $300 , 000,
and that since that type of construction was not
anticipated or called for in the RFP, the City
would pay the extra price. Hansen noted that
$379 , 000 is available which could be used to pay
that additional amount.
Lubovich noted for Dowell that there is no per-
formance bond and that the City is under no obli-
gation to pay until the project is complete. He
also stated that it is his recommendation that any
disagreements be handled through a litigation pro-
cess rather than an arbitration process. The
Mayor pointed out that because the contract
contains a termination without cause provision, if
the City is ever dissatisfied with the operation
of the facility they could create their own
housing authority and take the property back.
Mann and Orr expressed pleasure that this project
is becoming a reality and commended the committees
and administration for their work on it. The
motion to authorize City Administration to enter
into a Preliminary Agreement to Contract for Sale
between The Bellewood Corporation and the City of
Kent in a form substantially similar to the agree-
ment in the Council packet and further authorizing
City Administration to negotiate with the develop-
er a final site plan, performance specifications
and Contract for Sale then carried.
HOUSER MOVED for adoption of Ordinance 2985
accepting the Housing Cooperation Agreement and
authorizing its execution. Orr seconded. Upon
Dowell ' s question, Lubovich responded that the
termination provision could be changed from 90
days to 120 days . Dowell offered the change to
6
June 4 , 1991
SENIOR 120 days as a friendly amendment, which was
HOUSING accepted by Houser and Orr. The motion to adopt
Ordinance 2985 then carried.
HOUSER THEN MOVED for endorsement of the Framework
for a Support Services Package as outlined by the
Kent Senior Housing Support Services Committee.
Mann seconded and the motion carried.
Paul Morford, 21264 - 132nd Avenue SE, spoke in
favor of the project and said he hopes to see it
completed soon. Upon the Mayor' s question,
Harader stated that the construction documents
could be ready in sixty days, and Hansen noted
that if the plans are complete, review could be
accomplished in 30-40 days. Tracy Faust, Chair of
the Planning Commission, thanked the Council for
their approval of this project tonight. Mayor
Kelleher thanked the members of the committees,
staff members, the developer and architect, and
all who participated in this project.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the
bills received through May 31, 1991 after auditing
by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 4 : 45
p.m. on June 11, 1991 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers :
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/16-5/31/91 105336-105991 $1, 562 , 118 . 18
Approval of checks issued for payroll :
Date Check Numbers Amount
6/5/91 01155606-01156332 $ 634 , 466 . 71
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Domestic Abuse Women's Network (DAWN) Shelter.
AUTHORIZATION to allocate a minimum of $10, 000 to
the Domestic Abuse Women ' s Network (DAWN) as rec-
ommended by the Planning Committee and the Opera-
tions Committee to provide for the development of
a confidential shelter within the City of Kent.
7
June 4 , 1991
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
Catholic Community Services (CCS) Severe Weather
Emergency Shelter. AUTHORIZATION to allocate
$2 , 500 contingency funding to Catholic Community
Services (CCS) to assure that vouchers can be pro-
vided for severe weather sheltering through Decem-
ber 1991 as recommended by the Planning Committee
and the Operations Committee.
EXECUTIVE City Attorney Lubovich asked that an executive
SESSION session of approximately fifteen minutes be held
regarding two items of litigation: 1) the Rugg
lawsuit, and 2) Agenda Item 5A, LID 336 - East
Valley Highway Improvements. He asked that the
executive session take place before discussion of
the East Valley Highway Improvements, since it
could impact that item.
The meeting adjourned to Executive Session at 8 : 50
p.m. and reconvened at 9 : 05 p.m.
(RUGG) Regarding the RUGG lawsuit, Lubovich noted that no
action will be taken at this time.
(LID 336) (BIDS - ITEM 5A) .
LID 336 - East Valley Highway Improvements. Bid
opening was held May 24 with seven bids received.
The low bid was submitted by Gary Merlino Con-
struction in the amount of $2 , 587, 703 . 45 . Staff
recommends that this bid be accepted.
After the executive session, Lubovich stated that
a lawsuit had been filed today regarding the bid-
ding process and seeking a court order preventing
the City from awarding the contract to the company
they consider to be the most responsible bidder.
He added that he has reviewed the potential out-
comes of awarding the contract. WHITE MOVED that
Merlino Construction be awarded this contract in
the amount of $2 , 587 , 703 . 45 as the lowest respon-
sible bidder and that the Council issue the fol-
lowing findings of fact as the basis for awarding
this bid, based on information provided by the
Public Works Department: Merlino Construction has
acted with financial responsibility, has provided
the City with satisfactory past performance and
has fully complied with all technical specifica-
tions. Houser seconded and the motion carried.
8
June 4 , 1991
REPORTS Public Works Committee. White reported that he
had recently attended a meeting of the National
League of Cities Transportation and Communication
Committee in Washington D. C. and that he had
attended presentations on the Highways Bill and on
Cable TV. He added that although there will be a
new Cable TV Act, it will not contain a lot of
changes.
Parks Committee. Dowell noted that a request was
received this date from the Operations Committee
and that although it was discussed at the
committee meeting, no decision was reached. He
added that more information will be forthcoming
from the Parks and Finance departments.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9 : 15 p.m.
1 �
i
Brenda Jaco`ber,/ CMC
Deputy City�GYerk
9
.t
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: VOTERS PAMPHLET PARTICIPATION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the City to participate
in King County's regional voters pamphlet for the November 1991
election. Kent candidates and issues will be included in the
South King County pamphlet along with Federal, State and County
candidates and issues.
3 . EXHIBITS•
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
U Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: ALLEY VACATION BETWEEN SMITH AND HARRISON
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution (��6 setting the
date of August 6 for a public hearing on the petition for
vacation of the alley between Smith and Harrison, east of 6th
Avenue.
3 . EXHIBITS: Petition, vicinity map and resolution
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D�
MAIL T0: APPLICANT:
1 Gerald B. McCaughan Morgan Llewellyn
Il CITY OF KENT 9 Flame: 9 y
220 So. 4th Ave. Address: P. 0. Box 902
Kent, WA 98032 ojl1,b
1 Kent, WA 98035-0902
Phone: (206) 852-1898
STREET AND/OR ALLEY VACATION APPLICATION AND PETITION
Dear Mayor and Kent City Council :
We, the undersigned abutting property owners, hereby respectfully request that
certain hereby be vacated. (General Location)
Legal Description
That part of the dedicated alley lying between lots 1& 18,
Block 16, Yeslers 1st Addition to Kent, Vol. 5, Page 64 in
King County Washington
I
BRIEF STATEI4ENT WHY VACATION IS BEING SOUGHT
Vacation is being sought to allow construction of the
Kent Senior Housing Project
Sufficient proof; copy of deed contract etc. supported by King County
Tax Rolls shall be submitted for verification of signatures. Without
these a "CURRENT" title report shall be required. When Corporations,
Partnerships. etc. are being signed for, then proof of individual 's
authority to sign for same shall also be submitted.
Attach a color coded map of a scale of not less than 1" = 200' of the area
sought for vacation. (NOTE) Map must correspond with legal description.
ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS TAX LOT N
SIGNATURES AND ADDRESSES LOT, BLOCK & PLAT/SEC. TWN. RG
Tax Acct # 982570-1045-04
' 1A ofI Blk 1 Yeslers 1st Add to Kent
-�J )on V\� - ,,. ebQ �, Vol 5 Pg 64 King County WA
—TISc f aTd o a r
_ Tax Acct # 982570-1130-00
Lot 18, Blk 16, Yeslers 1st Add to Kent
Vol 5, Pa 64 in King County WA
— '"Rohald Byers /
$150.00 Fee Paid Treasurer's Receipt No. > Q
Appraisal Fee Paid Treasurer's Receipt No. .
Land Value Paid Treasurer's Receipt No.
Deed Accepted Date
Trade Accepted Date
5224-33A
bOp o„ co
00 •r.^ ^ w^ v•
10
M f I
41
• �' r I -' r(j� ''
e 1 .. ... �� \'NOpS
, ,. : 1 1C j_o SO ..so
HARRISON ST �]
y.11w i � El
I ell gOL"o z y Gao
�I �J" 1
:7 64
10 l0s0
"
II G
MEEKER ST o- :
w• b
7
C.C. m i•�IA �— !Sc SS C7n ,
4 4
16
-17
W. cowE sT
L L, — — —
5
I O'�� I_Goos � _ •'•r•, I �''
i
uJ
. � 00
L_S
YT
TITUS ST.
�.i _
h IH4
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City of Kent,
Washington, regarding vacation of a part of a
dedicated alley to allow construction of the
Kent Senior Housing project, as described in
attached Exhibit A, and setting the public
hearing for August 6, 1991.
WHEREAS, a proper petition has been filed requesting
vacation of a part of a dedicated alley on property located
between Smith and Harrison east of 6th Avenue to allow
construction of the Kent Senior Housing Project; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. A public hearing on the vacation petition
(attached hereto as Exhibit A) shall be held at a regular meeting
of the Kent City Council at 7 : 00 p.m. , August 6, 1991, in Council
Chambers of the City Hall, Kent, Washington.
Section 2 . The City Clerk shall give proper notice of
the hearing and cause notice to be posted as provided by law.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of , 1991.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of 1991 .
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
tit
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 18 . 1991
Category Consent Calendar
/ 1. SUBJECT: VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE/STREET UTILITY - RESOLUTION
. . ... .. ........
2 . ""S'FA °,MENT: _ A recommended by the Public Works-.)
Committee, doption of Resolution I.�W relating�o -
porta ion planning programming and coordination
requirements for using Local Option Transportation Revenues.
I ` �
3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution and excerpt from Public Works Committee
minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E✓
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, relating to
transportation planning, programming and
coordination requirements for using Local
Option Transportation Revenues authorized by
Chapter 82 .80 RCW.
WHEREAS, Chapter 82 .80 RCW Local Option Transportation
Taxes requires that, as a condition of levying or expending any of
the local option transportation revenues authorized by that
legislation, counties and cities over 8 , 000 population must meet
certain planning, programming and coordination requirements as
provided in RCW 82 . 80. 070; and
WHEREAS, King County has enacted the Local Option Vehicle
License Fee authorized by RCW 82 . 80. 020 effective July 1, 1991;
and the revenues from this new fee will be distributed by the
State Treasurer to King County and each of its cities, pursuant to
the formula established by RCW 82 . 80. 080; and
WHEREAS, on February 5, 1991 the Kent City Council passed
Resolution 1270 reflecting their intentions to form a Street
Utility; and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 1990, at the King County
Post-Legislative Session Transportation Forum, King County and
city elected officials agreed that there should be a common,
interim process for meeting the planning, programming and
coordination requirements of RCW 82 . 80. 070, and that the interim
process should be in effect until reorganization of the Countywide
and multicounty land use and transportation coordination agencies
is accomplished; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act of 1990 establishes
certain requirements for land use and transportation planning and
coordination among local jurisdictions, which requirements exceed
the scope of the requirements in RCW 82 . 80. 070, and for which new
planning and coordination procedures may have to be established;
and
WHEREAS, King County and all cities within the County
would benefit from a common framework within which to respond to
the requirements of RCW 82 . 80. 070 ; and
WHEREAS, the intent of the 1990 legislature in
authorizing these new local option transportation revenues was to
foster coordinated local and regional transportation planning and
to focus the use of these new revenue sources on addressing
multijurisdictional commuter congestion problems and other
priorities deemed appropriate by cities and counties;
WHEREAS, transportation planning and coordination among
local jurisdictions in King County is already occurring through
varied mechanisms and forums which can accomplish the intent of
RCW 82 . 80. 070 until such time that other applicable procedures are
established by a new countywide and/or multicounty planning
organization; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle and the
Washington State Department of Transportation should also be
involved in coordinated land use and transportation planning; NOW,
THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
2
1. The City of Kent shall use the interim process
described in Attachment A to meet the transportation planning,
programming and coordination requirements of RCW 82 .80. 070 until
such time that other applicable planning and coordination
procedures are established by a new countywide and/or multicounty
land use and transportation planning organization.
2 . With respect to the "specific transportation
programs" required by RCW 82 . 80. 070 to be adopted by each
jurisdiction over 8, 000 population, the City of Kent's 1991-1996
Transportation Improvement Program as adopted by City Council per
Resolution 1251 on July 19, 1990 shall constitute same; three
specific projects (corridor improvement) shown therein will be
financed, in part, by Vehicle License Fee Revenues and Street
Utility revenues.
3 . In conformance with RCW 82 . 80. 070 (3) Attachment B
describes the various elements of the City's Specific
Transportation Program as it relates to the Local Vehicle License
Fee revenues and the Street Utility revenues.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of 1991.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of 1991.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
3 -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, the day of , 1991.
(SEAL)
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
9520-340
4 -
Attachment A
INTERIM TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND COORDINATION PROCESS
(For Implementing RCW 82 . 80 Local Option Transportation Revenues)
SECTION I. DEFINITIONS
The "Eastside Transportation Program" or "ETP" is a
transportation planning and coordination effort which includes
King County, the cities of Bellevue, Bothell, Issaquah, Kirkland,
and Redmond, Metro, and WSDOT.
"Local Option Transportation Revenues" include the vehicle
license fee, local option gas tax, street utility and commercial
parking tax authorized by Chapter 82 . 80 RCW.
"Metro" is the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle.
A "Metropolitan Planning Organization" or "MPO" is an
organization designated jointly by local jurisdictions and the
Governor as the agency responsible for carrying out the
cooperative, continuing and comprehensive transportation planning
activities required by Section 134 , Title 23 USC.
"Regional Transportation and Land Use Plans" refers to those
multicounty and Countywide transportation and land use plans, such
as VISION 2020, adopted by the Puget Sound Council of Governments
as the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the Central
Puget Sound Region, until such time that a new agency is
designated as MPO and develops new regional plans.
The "South County Area Transportation Benefit District" or
"SCATBD" Steering Committee is a transportation planning and
coordination effort to establish a transportation benefit district
and includes representatives from King County, the cities of Kent,
Renton, SeaTac and Tukwila, Metro and WSDOT and the Valley Area
Transportation Alliance.
A "Transportation Plan" is a functional plan describing the
existing and proposed transportation facilities and services
within a jurisdiction. Such plans may be jurisdiction-wide or may
encompass a smaller geographic area.
"Transportation Program" refers to the specific
transportation program described in RCW 82 . 80. 070 (3) , and
required to be developed by each jurisdiction (with population of
8, 000 or more) that levies or expends any of the local option
transportation revenues.
"WSDOT" is the Washington State Department of Transportation.
Interim Transportation Planning and Attachment A
Coordination Process
SECTION II. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY
A. Applicability. The forums and processes described herein
shall be the interim method by which King County and the cities
within King County comply with the transportation planning,
programming and coordination requirements specified as a condition
of using the local option transportation revenues authorized by
Chapter 82.80 RCW, including the Vehicle License Fee which has
been implemented by King County effective July 1, 1991. This
interim method shall be used by King County and the cities within
King County until such time as superceding procedures are
established by a new Countywide and/or multicounty planning
organization with transportation planning and coordination
responsibilities.
B. Purpose.
1. The general purpose of the Interim Transportation
Planning and Coordination Process is to ensure that the
transportation planning, programming and coordination requirements
of RCW 82 . 80. 070 are complied with in an orderly and efficient
manner until such time that the process is replaced by new
processes as may be established by new intercounty and intracounty
transportation planning and coordination organizations.
2 . The specific purpose of this process shall be to
respond to the statutory requirements that:
(a) The Transportation Program of each jurisdiction
over 8 , 000 population indicate how the jurisdiction's
Transportation Plan (upon which the Transportation Program is
based) is coordinated with applicable Transportation Plans for the
region and for adjacent jurisdictions (RCW 82 . 80. 070 (3) (b) ) , and
(b) Jurisdictions over 8 , 000 population periodically
review and update their Transportation Programs to ensure
consistency with applicable local and regional transportation and
land use plans (RCW 82 .80. 070 (4) ) .
2 -
Interim Transportation Planning and Attachment A
Coordination Process
SECTION III. INTERIM PLANNING AND COORDINATION
Coordination among jurisdictions to ensure consistency
between Transportation Plans of adjacent jurisdictions and between
local plans and regional transportation and land use plans shall
be accomplished as follows:
A. Subregional Coordination.
1. To the extent possible, transportation planning,
coordination and dispute resolution shall be pursued through
existing subregional transportation planning groups such as the
ETP and SCATBD. Each such group will determine how this is best
accomplished within its geographic area.
2 . In geographic areas of the County where such groups
do not exist and when necessary, King County shall take the lead
in establishing such additional subregional transportation
planning forums.
B. Transportation Plans and Programs: Notification Review
and Comment.
1. The County and each city shall notify adjacent
jurisdictions, applicable regional transportation planning
agencies, WSDOT, and Metro at the earliest possible stage of
development of (a) a new regional , subregional, county community
land use and/or transportation plan or (b) revisions to such
plans, in order provide timely opportunities for review and
comment prior to adoption by the legislative authority.
2 . Prior to legislative adoption of a Transportation
Program, as required by RCW 82 .80. 070 (3) , King County and each
city shall submit to applicable regional transportation planning
agencies, adjacent jurisdictions, WSDOT and Metro: (a) the
proposed Transportation Program; and (b) the Transportation Plan
upon which the proposed Transportation Program is based. The
Transportation Program shall be transmitted to adjacent
jurisdictions and applicable regional agencies no later than the
same time it is transmitted to the jurisdiction's legislative body
for adoption in order that those agencies have opportunity to
formally comment on the Transportation Program before adoption.
3 . The County and each city should notify adjacent
jurisdictions, applicable regional transportation planning
agencies, WSDOT and METRO at the earliest possible stage of
development of a project to be included in their Transportation
- 3 -
Interim Transportation Planning and Attachment A
Coordination Process
Programs which will serve a multijurisdictional function or is
necessitated by existing or foreseeable congestion.
C. Transportation Program. The Transportation Program shall
be developed as an integral part of each jurisdiction's six-year
transportation capital improvement program. At a minimum, the
Transportation Program shall consist of a narrative report on the
specific points required to be addressed by RCW 82 . 80. 070
including identification of the transportation improvements and
services intended to be funded in whole or in part by local option
transportation revenues.
SECTION IV. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
A. Notification of appropriate jurisdictions at the earliest
stages of a transportation planning process shall be practiced in
order to identify potential problems and concerns and to seek
early resolution of any dispute.
B. Until such time that a specific procedure for resolving
transportation planning disputes is established as part of Growth
Management Act implementation, any party may use existing
processes for resolving disputes including, but not limited to:
(1) Appeal processes provided through the State Environmental
Policy Act (SEPA) , the Shoreline Management Act or other
regulatory measures; (2) Binding Arbitration; and (3) Voluntary
Mediation. Where subregional forums such as ETP or SCATBD exist,
those bodies may establish an appropriate dispute resolution
mechanism for their member jurisdictions.
9520-340
4 -
Attachment B
CITY OF KENT LOCAL OPTION REVENUE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM:
Summary of Elements
Geographic Boundaries
The City of Kent will expend its distributions of the Local Option
Vehicle License Fee revenues and revenues from a City implemented
Street Utility for transportation improvement uses within its
incorporated limits and within portions of unincorporated King
County described as follows:
Area 1: An area having a westerly boundary at 100 feet
westerly of the westerly right-of-way line of
Orillia Road, a southerly boundary of S. 204th
Street, a northerly boundary at 200 feet
northerly of S. 200th Street northerly
right-of-way line and an easterly boundary of
the City corporate limits.
Area 2 : An area having a southerly boundary of what
would be an east/west projection of S.E. 287th
Street, a westerly boundary of the Burlington
Rail Road, an easterly boundary of S.E. 132nd
Avenue and a northerly boundary, a combination
of S.E. 256th Street and the City of Kent's
corporate limits.
Adopted Transportation Plan
The City's Six Year Transportation Improvement Program is based
upon the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan (adopted in
1984) . The Capital Improvement Program identified therein is
annually reviewed and amended to assure its currency with the
needs (capacity and safety) of the City's transportation system
and the City's financial capability.
The City's Transportation Plan includes the following elements:
(a) Policy Elements
(b) An Arterial Plan
(c) Policy Constraints, Performance Standards
(d) A Capital Improvement Program
(e) A Financing and Implementation Report
The City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan establishes the
framework for public facility and service funding priorities by
stipulating that the first priority should be to maintain or
upgrade existing facilities and services where necessary to serve
existing development; financing improvements to serve new
development is a secondary priority. This policy is reflected in
Local Option Revenue Transportation Program Attachment B
the transportation program through the Public Works Department's
annual development of both the street maintenance and operation
budget and the street projects fund budget.
Since the City has traditionally funded its street maintenance and
operation program out of its general fund revenues, its dedicated
street revenues such as the gas tax, vehicle registration fees,
street utility, etc. are used to help finance the City's Street
C. I.P. The City's street capital improvement program includes all
street related projects, whether maintenance or enhancement,
exceeding $100, 000 in costs. The projects are prioritized by the
Public Works Department upon considering existing levels of
service and congestion, operational deficiencies, number of
accidents, system continuity and whether a project supports
adopted policies and plans. Maintenance of the existing
transportation system is, however, the Public Works Department's
first priority.
Each year, new projects are added to the six-year street CIP based
on their relative level of priority, as determined through the
Public Works Department's annual needs review of its
transportation system. The 1990 review served as the basis for
adding new improvement projects in developing the 1991-96 street
CIP.
In preparing the annual Transportation Needs Review the City's
Public Works Department provides adjacent cities and the county
with a list of its anticipated six-year project list for comments
and/or concurrence with any multijurisdictional projects. The
City's annual update of its six-year street program is completed
by June of each year and serves as a key tool in making the street
capital budgeting decisions for the coming year.
In recent years, the development of the City's six-year street CIP
has incorporated the multijurisdictional transportation planning
efforts of the proposed South County Area Transportation Benefit
District (SCATBD) . This subregional planning effort has provided
the City a useful forum with which to work with King County,
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) , Metro and
the cities of Auburn, Renton, Tukwila, Seatac and Des Moines per
identifying critical transportation improvement needs in the South
King County area.
The City's existing Transportation Priority Process, its annual
transportation review process, its street CIP budgeting policies,
and its participation in subregional transportation planning
2 -
Local Option Revenue Transportation Program Attachment B
forums (SCATBD) promote the statutory priorities for the use of
the local option transportation revenues, which are:
(1) Project serves a multijurisdictional function;
(2) Project necessitated by existing or reasonably
foreseeable congestion;
(3) Project has the greatest person-carrying capacity;
(4) Project is partially funded by other government
funds; and
(5) Any other criteria the local government deems
appropriate.
Coordination with Other Plans
The City of Kent's Transportation Plan (KTP) is the product of a
rigorous planning process, including continual coordination with
other local jurisdictions and regional planning agencies. A key
element of the KTP is the annual review of the City's Six-Year
Transportation Needs, which reflects an update of transportation
improvement needs based upon changing conditions. Integral tasks
in developing the City's Six-Year Capital Improvement Program
include public meetings, input from other local governments and
WSDOT, and joint planning efforts with other government agencies
on multijurisdictional projects.
The SCATBD forum mentioned above is an example of a coordinated
transportation planning effort, the results of which provide input
to the City's six-year street program. The City is involved in
other planning studies with individual government agencies on a
broad range of issues -- from project specific corridor analyses
to regional programmatic actions.
Six-Year Funding Plan
As noted earlier, the City's specific transportation program for
the use of the new Local Option Vehicle License Fee and the Street
Utility revenue is primarily reflected in the 1991-96
Transportation Improvement Program as adopted by City Council
Resolution 1251. Within that program said local option revenues
will be spent over the next six years on the following three
specific projects: 272nd/277th Corridor (Auburn Way North to
SR516) , 196th/192nd Corridor (West Valley Highway to East Valley
Highway) and 200th/196th Corridor (Orillia Road to West Valley
Highway) .
A six-year funding plan identifying the specific public and
private revenue sources and amounts of revenue necessary to fund
these projects as well as a schedule for design, right-of-way
acquisition and construction therefor is summarized in Exhibit A.
- 3 -
Local Option Revenue Transportation Program Attachment B
Annual Review
The City will review its specific transportation program for local
option transportation revenues annually as part of the annual
transportation system planning and budgeting process.
Non-Diversion
None of either the City Local Option vehicle License Fee revenues
or its Street Utility revenue will be used to replace, divert, or
loan any revenues historically used for transportation purposes to
nontransportation purposes.
Intergovernmental Cooperation
The City will continue to work cooperatively with WSDOT, Metro,
King County, adjacent cities and regional planning agencies to
coordinate transportation planning efforts on projects of regional
significance. Once new inter- and intra-county planning agencies
are in place (as a result of regional governance reform and/or
efforts to replace the Puget Sound Council of Governments) , the
City will work with the other jurisdictions to establish
appropriate mechanisms and practices to promote this planning and
coordination.
9520-340
4 -
—i C� Nt7Cc� r --1 C C) v z SOl Ocn = r
0 w r+ O m w o -+ m o 0 m , S vO
r+ to c CD :3 _�ton D z C+ -S
-� S m 0 f) ---I�. m J. CD r+ C")
O r+ J. w N V) a � ;a O O J. O 7 V
7 m X ►-�r+ O C -s w 0 V
C w Z PO �•1 r+ S e-t-
x r+ w z -+ o r+ m ;a S w S
wJ• = m sm .. N z vo 0- 1<
�.Lo 0 3 D O z o
t"h (A m m 'S C")
r+o -5 �
co r+ w a w o -+ r+
OZtnmo < .D sO_ 00.
0 w m r+ m r C O O
D_ rt N 2 Z -
0
to to to Z ~'
c -1 r+ a'
CD m -s
m •.
0
r*
to
Pro
.A ? m
�IryflII�IrI.N N Ul W �--. �-+ ? W N N 7 0
Nco C W CD tD Ql r tD OD 00 a.r+
O o m O w o w M o o m Cu
N O O Cl N m V V
O
A N rJ A Ul tD v
cn oD rn crl Ul I� m rn m
o o o z cox
co
N H
�CT �N t-+ r Ul Vl O Z C D .
W N O W W 4� W W Il0 G G7 C
a o w ++ o Ul 0 r
o V o o tD 4� o o N H m
J.
0 m
[OD
0 I W N 00 coI
tD
W O w WtD tD tD tD tD OO Co Ul .A � N Ql O OtD G
A O V Ul 00 4+ 00 C7 W to
cu
n
N
Ul i-+ IJ Cn Ul Ul Ul Ol
W O4PW W WN W W
? V V ? ?(PI N V tT tD �••' tD
Ol N O -N r 00 'J Dl 61 A t ?
C)
v o
►r o z
o Co o Nn
O w LnW W WL" N N O CDO tD w D1 N W cn O O D ZW O N V►+ �--� ? H C--1 to
v C
Z f.fl
N
-i
r;�
NJul IM
to
coV ? �A Ln tJl 00.A
tD
Cn
Q
n � Kent City Council Meeting
fv Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CENTRAL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (WILLIS TO SMITH) -
2 . SUMMARY ST : -__ Arecommmmended to the -Public Works_)
Committee; thorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement
with Washington State Department of Transportation to receive
$110, 000 for Central Avenue improvements from Willis to Smith
Streets.
1/
3 . EXHIBITS: Draft of agreement and memorandum from Public Works
Director
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION-
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F✓
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
June 13, 1991
TO: PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
FROM: DON WICKSTROM
RE: CENTRAL AVENUE IMPROVEMENT (WILLIS TO SMITH) - AGREEMENT
WITH WSDOT
As part of Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)
pavement resurfacing work on SR 516, $110, 000 was set aside for the
resurfacing (overlay) of Central Avenue (SR 516) from Willis to
Smith.
In a separate action, the City of Kent petitioned for and received
funds from the Transportation Improvement Board to also widen a
portion of this section. WSDOT has agreed to turn over their funds
to the City for overlay after Central Avenue is widened. The
attached "State Participating Agreement" is the contract agreement
allowing the WSDOT fund transfer.
It is necessary to have the agreement signed by the first of July,
thus, this item will be coming before you at the Council meeting on
June 18 as well as the Public Works Committee meeting of the same
date. We are recommending the Mayor be authorized to sign the
agreement and that a budget be established for said funds.
Washington$tat.
Department of Transportation
ORGANIZATION AND ADDRESS
STATE city of Kent
220 Fourth AvaliI
PARTICIPATING Kent, IYA 9
fi
AGREEMENT %0IMMPLE
WORK BY LOCAL AGENCY SECTION/LOCATION
ACTUAL COST Central Avenue - Willis to Smith
AGREEMENT NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF WORK
State participating in resurfacing of existing
roadway. City to expand project with UATA & City
STATEROUTE CONIROLSECTION DISTRICT funds. Work includes u!idening for left turn lanes.
NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER sidewalk, curb L gutter, drainage, etc.
516 1
THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this day of 19_, between 0,- STP
OF WASHINGTON, Department of Transportation, acting by and through the Secretary of Trans% rt�hereinafter called the AT
and the above named organization, hereinafter called the "LOCAL AGENCY."
WHEREAS,the LOCALAGENCY is planning the construction of a project as shown above,and in connection therewith,the STA-
has requested that the LOCAL AGENCY perform certain work as herein described, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interest for the STATE to include specific items of work in the LOCAL AGENC`
construction contract proposed for the above-noted project, and
WHEREAS, the STATE is obligated for the cost of work described herein.
NOW THEREFORE,by virtue of Title 39.34 and in consideration of the terms,conditions,covenants,and performances contain
herein, or attached and incorporated and made a part hereof, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOINS:
f The STATE may,if it desires,furnish an inspector on the project. Ai
GENERAL costs for such inspection will be borne solely by the STATE. f
contact between said inspector and the LOCAL AGENCY's contra,
The LOCAL AGENCY, as agent acting for and on behalf of the for shall be through the LOCAL AGENCY's representative
STATE, agrees to perform the above "Description of Work."
The STATE agrees, upon satisfactory completion of the work it
Plans, specifications and cost estimates shall be prepared by the volved,to deliver a letter of acceptance which shall include areleas
LOCAL AGENCY in accordance with the current State of Washing- and waiver of all future claims or demands of any nature resullir,
ton Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Con- from the performance of the work under this AGREEMENT.
struction and adopted design standards, unless otherwise noted. I
The LOCAL AGENCY will incorporate the plans and specifications PAYMENT
into the LOCAL AGENCY's project and thereafter advertise the
resulting project for bid and, assuming bids are received and a The STATE, in consideration of the faithful performance of the wor
contract is awarded, administer the contract. to be done by the LOCALAGENCY,agrees to reimburse th, 3X
AGENCY for the actual direct and related indirect cost of thrwork
The LOCALAGENCY agrees to submitplans and specifications for up to $110,000.
the described work as shown on Exhibit"B,"attached hereto and by An itemized estimate of cost for work to be performed by the LOCA.
this reference made a part of this AGREEMENT, to the STATE for AGENCY at the STATE's expense is marked Exhibit "A," and j,
approval prior to advertising the project. attached hereto and by this reference made a part of this AGREE
MENT.
Partial payments shall be made by the STATE, upon request of the MENT will be modified by supplemental AGREEMENT covr
LOCALAGENCY,to cover costs incurred. These payments are not said increase.
to be more frequent than one (1) per month. It is agreed that any
such partial payment will not constitute agreement as to the appro- In the event it is determined that any change from the descriptir
priateness of any item and that, at the time of the final audit, all work contained in this AGREEMENT is required, approval mue
required adjustments will be made and reflected in a final payment. secured from the STATE prior to the beginning of such work. W
the change is substantial, written approval must be secured.
The LOCAL AGENCY agrees to submita final bill to the STATEwithin
forty-five (45) days after the LOCAL AGENCY has completed the Reimbursement for increased work and/or a substantial chan<
work. the description of work shall be limited to costs covered by a wr
modification, change order or extra work order approved b�
111 STATE.
DELETION OF WORK
V
In the event the estimate of cost, Exhibit"A",is in excess of$10,000 RIGHT OF ENTRY
and the total actual bid prices for the work covered by this AGREE-
MENT exceeds the estimate of cost by more than 15 percent, the The STATE hereby grants and conveys to the LOCAL AGENCY
STATE shall have the option of directing the LOCAL AGENCY to right of entry upon all land which the STATE has interest, withi
delete all or a portion of the work covered by this AGREEMENT from adjacent to the right of way of the highway, for the purpos
the LOCALAGENCY's contract. Except,that this provision shall be constructing said improvements,
null and void if the STATE's portion of the work exceeds 20 percent
of the actual total contract bid price. Upon completion of the work outlined herein,all future operation
maintenance of the STATE's facilities shall be at the sole cost of
The STATE shall have five(5)working days from the date of written STATE and without expense to the LOCAL AGENCY.
notification toinformthe LOCAL AGENCY to delete thework. Should
the STATE exercise its option to delete work, the STATE agrees, VI
upon billing by the LOCAL AGENCY, to reimburse the LOCAL LEGAL RELATIONS
AGENCY for preliminary engineering costs incurred by the LOCAL
AGENCY to include the work covered by this AGREEMENT in the No liability shall attach to the LOCAL AGENCY or the STATE
LOCALAGENCY's contract. reason ofentering into this agreement except as expresslyprovic
herein.
IV
EXTRA WORK
In the event unforeseen conditions require an increase in the cost of
25 percent or more from that agreed to on Exhibit"A," this AGREE-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written.
LOCAL AGENCY STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By: \City of F(ent
By:
r
Date: SAMPLE
FORM 224-067
`OT REVISED 11/88 2_
io Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: RUSSELL ROAD BALLFIELD LIGHTING
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to accept the lighting
project on Field #2 at Russell Road Park as complete and to
release retainage to Service Electric Company, Inc. upon receipt
of State releases. The project was completed in a timely manner
and within budget.
3 . EXHIBITS•
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Department Staff Washington State
Electrical Inspector
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G ✓
CV
r � PVy Kent City Council Meeting
6 Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: GLENN NELSON PARK TOT LOT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to accept the Glenn Nelson
Park Tot Lot as complete and to release retainage to R.W.
O'Connell Landscaping upon receipt of State releases. The
project was completed in a timely manner and within budget.
3 . EXHIBITS•
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Department Staff; Consultant Hough, Beck
and Baird
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H✓
(1�W.Wl
a Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: GOLF OPERATIONAL AUDIT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As discussed with the Council's
Operations and Parks Committees and as recommended by the
Operations Committee, the Council is being requested to
authorize administration to select the best firm at a reasonable
price to perform an operational audit of the City's Golf
Complex. The audit is being requested to clarify the financial
position of the Golf Complex with respect to the cost of
operation and its impact on other City funds. The funding
source for the cost of the audit, which will be less than
$17 , 000, will be determined at a later date.
3 . EXHIBITS: Golf Complex Operating Statement and Golf RST
Proposal Review
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO YES X
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended\ Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $16, 500
SOURCE OF FUNDS: to be determined
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I✓
MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
ject: GOLF OPERATIONAL AUDIT
;_rgator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 06/13/91 at 1239.
THE ATTACHED FINANCIAL ANALYSIS FOR THE CITY OF KENT'S GOLF COMPLEX SHOWS A
POSITIVE NET INCOME STREAM AS REFLECTED BY THE FIRST ARROW ON THE NEXT PAGE.
THE HIGHEST NET INCOME AMOUNT, 1990, THOUGH IS INFLATED DUE TO THE SALE OF
LAND FOR THE MOTEL / SHOPPING COMPLEX. WITH THIS EXTRAORDINARY ITEM EXCLUDED,
IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE NET INCOME STREAM IS LARGE ENOUGH TO COVER DEBT
SERVICE, CAPITAL REPLACEMENT AND INVENTORY ADDITIONS PLUS PAY OFF THE LINE
OF CREDIT FROM THE GENERAL FUND.
THE ANALYSIS SHOWS THE ACTUAL GOLF COMPLEX LINE OF CREDIT AT DECEMBER 31,
1991 AT $700, 000. AS CAN BE SEEN BY THE SECOND AND THIRD ARROW, THE LINE OF
CREDIT IS NEEDED TO COVER THE "UNRESERVED WORKING CAPITAL" .
TO PAY BACK THE LINE OF CREDIT, IT IS ESTIMATED THAT 1991 WILL GENERATE A
POSITIVE CASH FLOW OF $197 , 105 EXCLUDING THE LINE OF CREDIT. AT THAT RATE IT
WILL TAKE APPROXIMATELY 3 . 7 YEARS TO PAY BACK THE LINE OF CREDIT AND THAT MAY
BE OPTIMISTIC. 1989 HAD A DEFICIT CASH FLOW AND 1990 WOULD HAVE HAD A DEFICIT
EXCEPT FOR THE SALE OF THE LAND.
IN ADDITION INFLATIONARY PRESSURES PARTICULARLY FROM SALARIES AND BENEFITS
CONTINUE TO FORCE UP GOLF COMPLEX COSTS. A STUDY SHOULD BE UNDERTAKEN TO SEE IF
THOSE COSTS ARE APPROPRIATE AND CAN BE CONTROLLED OR IF OTHER FUNDING OPTIONS
ARE AVAILABLE.
City of Kent 1991 GOFAPR91
Golf Complex 1989 1990 1991 4/30 1991 1991
Actual Actual Budget Actual Est Actual Full Cost
REVENUE:
Charges For Services:
Green Fees-9 Hole 187,198 205,846 300,000 52,515 230,328 230,328
Green Fees-Riverbend 561,983 886,944 1,112,000 259,442 1,060,363 1,060,363
Range Fees 364,135 408,974 510,000 155,910 532,705 532,705
Miscellaneous Revenue 293,284 577,941 1,032,711 197,263 819,098 819,098
Operating Revenue 1,406,600 2,079,705 2,954,711 665,130 2,642,494 2,642,494
EXPENSES:
Salaries 386,228 625,519 621,288 212,085 621,288 621,288
Benefits 81,635 138,661 146,928 52,562 146,928 146,928
Supplies 229,543 379,257 489,548 170,192 475,398 475,398
Services and Charges 257,219 383,765 440,614 142,116 413,606 413,606
Operating Expenses Exc Dep 954,625 1,527,202 1,698,378 576,955 1,657,220 1,657,220
Operating Income Exc Dep 451,975 552,503 1,256,333 88,175 985,274 985,274
Depreciation 39,135 226,311 226,311 0 226,311 226,311
Operating Income 412,840 326,192 1,030,022 88,175 758,963 758,963
NONOPERATING REVENUE & (EXPENSES):
Interest Income 44,067 106,902 42,362 443 42,362 42,362
Other Non-Operating Income 3,091 8,922 3,000 1,383 3,000 3,000
Interest Expense (267,530) (440,255) (452,823) (14,127) (462,013) (732,515)
Amortization of Interest (11,388) (11,388) (11,388) 0 (11,388) (11,388)
Total Nonop. Rev.& Exp. (231,760) (335,819) (418,849) (12,301) (428,039) (698,541)
Net Income (Loss) 181,080 (9,627) 611,173 75,874 330,924 60,422
Extraordinary Gain-Land Sale 836,960
Net Income (Loss)
After extraordinary gain 181,080 827,333 611,173 75,874 330,924 60,422 (z
OTHER FINANCIAL SOURCES (USES)
Add back-Depreciation 39,135 226,311 226,311 0 226,311 226,311
-Amortization 11,388 11,388 11,388 0 11,388 11,388
Principal 189 Cart Lease/Purch (14,997) 0 (2,628) (17,323) (17,323)
Principal 188 Rev. Bond (135,000) (135,000) (145,000) 0 (145,000) (145,000)
Principal 186 G.O. Debt 0 0 0 0 (78,840)
Principal 185 G.O. Debt s 0 0 0 0 (100,000)
Transfer 185 G.O. Debt (140,000) (140,000) (140,000) 0 (140,000) 0
Acquisition of Capital Assets (342,488) (584,387) (20,000) 0 (69,195) (69,195)
Increase in Inventory (73,243)
Total Other Sources (Uses) (566,965) (709,928) (67,301) (2,628) (133,819) (172,659)
Increase (Decrease) In Cash (385,885) 117,405 543,872 73,246 197,105 (112,237)
Line of Credit from General Fund
Paid off (800000) (1,200,000) (700,000) (700,000) (700,000)
Issued & Outstanding 1,200:000 700,000 722,046 722,046 722,046
Beginning Working Capital 317,859 331,974 16,248 (50,621) (50,621) (50,621)
Ending Working Capital
Reserved for Debt Service (1) 517,811 538,074 560,120 560,120 560,120 560,120
Unreserved (185,837) (588,695) 0 (515,449) (391,590) (700,932) -E 3
Total (2) 331,974 (50,621) 560,120 44,671 168,530 (140,812)
(1) Actual and estimated amounts in Golf Course Debt Service Reserve fund per bond ordinance.
90 Wkg Cap
(2) Current Assets 938,525
Current Liabilities 989,146 (50,621)
City of Kent FILENAME: GOFEST91
Golf Complex 13-Jun-91
Statement of Revenues and Expenses
For the 4 Months Ended 4/30/91
Driving
Range
Golf Golf Mini-Putt
Admin Maint Riverbend Par Three Pro Shop Total
REVENUE
Green Fees 259,442 52,515 311,957
Driving Range Fees 155,910 155,910
Miscellaneous Revenue
Mini-putt Fees 0 12,104 12,104
Golf lessons 0 30,037 30,037
Sale of Merchandise 10,300 2,415 59,926 72,641
Sale of Food 41,505 6,288 2,580 50,373
Rentals and Miscellaneous 19,371 4,067 8,670 32,108
Operating revenue 0 0 330,618 65,285 269,227 665,130
EXPENSES
Salaries 24,386 87,600 48,177 9,728 42,194 212,085
Benefits 5,872 24,964 10,775 934 10,017 52,562
Supplies:
Items purchased for resale(1) 22,729 7,242 79,054 109,025
Other 1,486 10,714 7,533 2,928 38,506 61,167
Services and Charges
City Allocations 25,289 25,289
Golf Administration Allocation (101,857) 40,743 10,186 50,928 0
Golf Maintenance Allocation (203,408) 132,215 20,341 50,852 0
Other 32,385 34,653 18,599 4,987 26,203 116,827
Operating expense excluding dep (12,439) (45,477) 280,771 56,346 297,754 576,955
Operating income excluding dep 12,439 45,477 49,847 8,939 (28,527) 88,175
Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0
Operating income 12,439 45,477 49,847 8,939 (28,527) 88,175
NON OPERATING REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES
Interest income 443 443
Other non-operating income 1,383 1,383
Interest expense-bonds 0
Interest expense-golf carts (1,791) (1,791)
Interest expense-working capital (12,336) (12,336)
Amortization of interest 0
0 0 (13,684) 0 1,383 (12,301)
NET INCOME 12,439 45,477 36,163 8,939 (27,144) 75,874
OTHER FINANCIAL SOURCES (USES)
Add back-Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0
-Amortization 0 0 0 0 0 0
Principal 89 Cart Lease/Purch (2,628) (2,628)
Principal 88 Rev. Bond 0
Transfer for 85 GO Debt 0
Acquisition of Capital Assets 0
Total Other Sources (Uses) 0 0 (2,628) 0 0 (2,628)
INCREASE (DECREASE) 1N CASH 12,439 45,477 33,535 8,939 (27,144) 73,246
m N n m i n n v n
C z C N n0 m o o a 0 o n a C 0 m N r0 z O o
y z N or in r -+ o r y V n r X O a m o C O T
i 0 0 a r 0 +� = m
D A x Z ti 0 K O O Z p -� m D n /- N O
r m m K S A A N b D z o m r W m m O m N z 0 N > -� a s
K A L D m V ➢. z a r A
y A n D C ti C rn ~ n o C T n o m z = a z
N Z A A m 0 ^ n0 > = N a C y0 m m y K
n m O n r Z O r n O A n j 2 A m m m_ z
v O n 0 W i n - S T W m T 00 D <
A O W = n -1 -1 r
o D a O -� n m O \
W N A r D K C N m a N P m Z m N T a m
N y p r a
r V T ^ r W Z V A O N .n n - .<..
O L T A OZn
T y n V T - O D a a n O ti
T N
y -'n
• i 0 0
r
w w m
ra- vmi n pp o a
N T D A A Or 2 m N A A m N a T Z 0 3 T Z m -+ b < 0 0 Z D X Z Z D m
9 D •� N Z m O C T m L ~ t A m O ,� y n C A N -1 N 22� n T O O �/O1 9 A
C = y T n S N •" m D Lt V a Z
G N O O y 2 m �- m a T ` p n N^ O O n
K p y b K p O D Z r T •-1 T
N O G n r A A �1 _m a p " v D K T m r D -y T D ~ Z O v Z m m
y ,y .-. .. T N m ^
A �- D -T• y O S A T Z A A 9 W oo
z .n = 3 A •� T a n O D T O n A A p b y 0 v C y T O K y C n
O m m 2 N T Z r n n O N T O '� O N T Z no T N Z A
A V Z m v m O 3 M - T Z O N T n m n y A -1 D N Z C •y N n m O
T S O m 9 pJ
v 0
A T n < D S m T n D p - n D -i T •� 2 r p N y N
N n m r T Z O r Z r C n O r K N -1
O m A a Y. Z ,a O y y y T a O 3 r < p
2 < A m m N Z O W Z Z r T
A O
C f C m a
O a O n n m A N y p r n T
m N T z -� n m C D D Z Z
y
pr p n
m
T A o 3 $ r T
p T y N -� y •-1 .Ar �I A !� A ti m
m S V W 3 n D m
O T D v Q 0
m
a D Z m K •-1 O Z -1 A N T A •S O O
n p m r T K D D A m a N O_ O m m x n m �- Z
r 3 m m A •+ K n )C A m 0 O o K ti y
OS A O S T T O m IP L N T b 2 O T C N •A
T T >C T O O O O D T D ti
N T A C T A m < -` Z S - K Z D - T O D Z O A T
n y n m D •• A m O - T m N D Z T O n O
N O O n r Z 9 N A O m O r -� n m A m
_ C O_ �"' O- D A r \
p m n r a N
K V�
. A T a O N o n• K O � � O m a -+ Oo T Z V O
v Z V -+ N b -• O n z r 0 r -Zi 0 -~i < ti
N p A T X r n
T m T N p A Z ^
r n A •-1 K
y T L pn A ~ p' D a
0 m 3 m C L Z r m D N
n n 0 m = m m A rn K m
y O m ti N
m N m
Z N
H
N
P i
y � O t W N O
m w v i m Qx -Dc m
m
N N N N y M A N C N O
O O y m a r O o VI
0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0
N z < n 2 .n,• y tmn a S 30 ~p
-1 N
m r m O K
o m m 3 K A
O _
V Z 0 = m A L A A O
A 'O 2 O ti A •-1 yp
=A 3
O r r m I m
m �• A A y O O
N
n m A
x L z i
r
K
N
N
W N w ~
W N �
�rr
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT - FIRE INSPECTIONS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign an
agreement with King County and the Commissioners of King County
Fire District 37 allowing the City to perform inspections in the
fire district to better evaluate and litigate hazards. The
County will co a the cost of insurance premiums as would be
calculated if id not have self insurance and the City will
also receive a percentage of the hazardous material/public
assembly inspection permit fees.
3 . EXHIBITS: Interlocal agreement between King County and the
City of Kent
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo, Fire Chief and Public Safety
Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J V
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN Om
KING COUNTY y✓J
AND (((���
THE CITY OF KEM'
W[IEREAS, RCW 19.27.030,provides that on and after January 1,
1975, there shall be in effect in all cities, towns, and counties
of the state a state building code; and
WIIEREAS, RCW 19.27.030(3) provides that a portion of the
aforementioned code shall consist of the Uniform Fire Code and
the Uniform Fire Code Standards, 1985 edition, published by the
International Conference of Building officials and the Western
Fire Chiefs Association; and
WIIEREAS, RCW 19.27.040 authorizes counties to amend any
component of the state building code as it applies within its
jurisdiction in all such respects as shall be not less than the
minimum performance standards and objectives enumerated in RCW
19.27.020; and
WHEREAS, KCC 17.04.020 provides that the terms "fire chief"
and "fire department" as used in the Uniform Fire code shall mean
fire marshal and fire marshal's office of King County,
respectively; and
WHEREAS, Section 2.103(a) of the King County Modifications
to the 1985 Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by K.C. Ordinance 8184
provides the King County Fire Marshal's Office shall have respon-
sibility for inspections and the enforcemenL- of the fire preven-
tion provisions of the code; and further provides that the Chief
of a fire department or fire district, acting under the
supervision of the Board of Fire commissioners in that district,
and in coordination with the Fire Marshal's Office may perform
duties specified in the Uniform Fire Code within the geographical
boundaries of the fire protection district, to the full extent
required by the Fire Marshal's office; and
1
WHEREAS, the City of
KFNf currently provides fire
protection, inspections and verifies code compliance on behalf of
King County within the boundaries of King County Fire District
No. 37 ; and
WHEREAS, King County and the City Of KFNC
desire to
provide by Agreement for effective inspection pursuant to the
Uniform Fire code within the jurisdictional boundaries of King
county Fire Protection District No. 37 and effective
administration and inspection of the Hazardous Materials
Inspection/Permit Program, NOW, THEREFORE
IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. OBLIGATIONS:
1.1 In consideration of the promises of the City of Kent,
King County agrees to continue to be responsible for the
enforcement of the Uniform Fire Code in District No. 37 as
provided for by King County Title 23, to be responsible for the
issuance of all required permits or certificates, to collect all
required permit fees, to transmit and disburse to the City of
Kent monetary sums as defined below in Paragraph 9; and to
pay for additional insurance premium charges to the City of
KENT that are incurred as a result of the City's
participation in the activities described in this contract, as
provided herein.
1.2 In consideration of the promises of the County
herein before set forth, the City Of KEW agrees to
perform inspections in accordance with the terms and provisions
of the Uniform Fire Code of King County, and the guidelines
established by the King County Fire Marshal. The City of
agrees to inspect occupancies, as defined in
Table 5A of the Uniform Building Code, other than single family-
dwellings and those occupancies classified as "M," on an annual
basis. The City Of yrua further agrees to make one.
reinspection when required. Additional reinspections or other
actions required for code compliance shall become the
2
responsibility of the King County Fire Marshal's Office.
1.3 The City of KENf further agrees to
inspect occupancies within King County Fire Protection District
No. 39 jurisdiction for conditions requiring permits or
certificates under the Uniform Fire Code. Such inspections shall
take place as part of the routine annual maintenance inspection.
When a condition requiring permit or certificate is identified
the City shall provide the occupant with a permit application,
verify code provisions for the permitted use or material are
being met, initiate corrective action when needed, and notify the
Fire Marshal's Office of any expired or missing permits or
certificates.
1.4 If for any reason, the City of KENP
cannot meet the objective setiforth in Section 1.3, above, the
City will seek additional assistance from the King County Fire
Marshal's Office. The promise of the City to inspect occupancies
is not intended for the benefit of any third party but solely to
provide assistance to the King County Fire Marshal's Office.
2. TIME OF PERFORMANCE:
This Agreement shall be effective on the 1st day of
1Aeua" 19 91, and terminate on the 31st day of
December, 19_ql.
3. AUDITS AND INSPECTION:
All records and documents with respect to this
Agreement shall be subject to mutual inspection and review by
both parties during the performance of this Agreement and seven
(7) years after termination.
4. NONDISCRIMINATION:
No contractors, subcontractors, or union doing business
with the County or the City of KINP , or furnishing
workers or services in connection therewith, shall discriminate
against any person on the basis of race, color, creed, sex, age,
nationality, marital status or the presence of any sensory,
3
mental or physical handicap (provided that such handicap does not
hinder the performance of the job) , in employment, and no such
contractor, subcontractor, or union shall violate any of the
terms of Chapter 49.60 of the Revised Code of Washington, Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or any other applicable
federal, state or local law or regulation regarding
nondiscrimination in employment'.
5. MODIFICATION:
This Agreement is the complete expression of terms
agreed upon and any oral representation or understandings not
incorporated herein are excluded. Further, any modification of
this Agreement shall be in writing,lsigned by both parties, and
made a part of this Agreement.
6. TERMINATION:
This Agreement shall be terminated only upon thirty
(30) days written notice received by one signatory, given by the
other. Failure to comply with any of the provisions stated
herein shall constitute material breach of contract and be cause
for immediate termination. Any termination of this Agreement
shall not terminate those obligations of either party matured
prior to such termination.
7. EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION AND CONTROL:
7.1 King County shall be responsible for the payment
of. all salaries, wages, other benefits and compensation to all
County employees performing services under this Agreement.
Further, King County shall be solely responsible for control of
i
personnel, standards of performance, discipline and all other
aspects of performance of all County employees performing
services under this Agreement.
7.2 The City of KENP shall be responsible
for the payment of all salaries, wages, other benefits and
compensation to all City employees performing services under this
4
i
Agreement. Further, the City of _KENr_�—
shall be solely
responsible for control of personnel, standards of performance,
discipline and all other aspects of performance of all City of
KUM employees performing services under this
Agreement.
g, LIABILITY:
KERr agrees to assume
B.1 The City of _________—
responsibility for all liabilities that occur or arise in any way
out of the performance of this contact by its employees only and
to save and hold King County and County employees and officials
harmless from all costs, expenses, losses, and damages, including
the cost of defense, incurred as a result of any acts or
omissions of City employees relating to the performance of this
Contract. The City of KENT also agrees to carry at
all times during the effective period of this contract liability
insurance coverage in the amount of $2,000,000.00 covering the
County for all activities of the City of KExr
employees related to the performance of this contract.
8.2 King County agrees to assume responsibility for
all liabilities that occur or arise in any way out of the
performance of this contract by its employees only and shall save
and hold the City of xENr and City employees and
officials and the District and the District employees and
officials harmless from all costs, expenses, losses and damages,
including the cost of defense, incurred as a result of any acts
or omissions of King County employees relating to the performance
of this contract.
I
9, PAYMENT:
9.1 King County agrees to pay the City of KENT —
an amount equal to the amount required to pay for any additional
insurance premium attributable to the city's performance of
obligations under this contract, not to exceed
during the terms of this Agreement. The payment shall coincide
5
with the City of K"Tr normal insurance billing date
(July 1) .
9.2 King County further agrees to pay the City of
KFNT a sum for all permits issued to occupants within
King County Fire District No. 3Z jurisdictional boundaries as
calculated under the following formula:
X .5 (Y _ .75)
X = Fire district share of revenue
I y = Fee charged permit applicant
This formula is meant to represent fifty percent (50%) of all
permit fee revenues, together with fifty percent (50%) of the
portion of the Hazardous Materials/Public Assembly Inspection
Program funds being paid from the King County general fund for
the individual permits issued.
9.3 In the event of early termination of the contract
the City of KENT shall pay to King County an amount
equal to any funds returned to the City by the insurance company
as a result of such termination of contract.
10. ORDINANCES:
King County agrees that it shall notify the City
of KENT prior to the adoption of any ordinance that
affects or requires inspections to be made under the Uniform Fire
Code or in any way affects the duties of the City of
p under the terms of this contract.
11. FORMS:
In the event the County shall specify or require
any forms or written report which are required to be used under
the terms of this Agreement, the County agrees to provide such
forms to the city of Krr•P at the expense of the
County.
6
1
12. RECORDS:
All records compiled by the City of KENT
under the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute records
of the City of KFwr but shall be available for
inspection by appropriate County officials.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused
this Agreement to be executed.
I
COUNTY COUNCIL CITY OFIQ•NT
Signature Signature (Mayor)
i
Name Name
i
County Executive Commissioner
i
Dated Dated
Approved as to form
Commissioner
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Dated
Commissioner
fdagree.sp Dated
1/26/BB
Approved as to Form:
Roger Lubovich, City Attorney
WITNESS:
Brenda Jacober, Deputy City Clerk
7
I
i K)
(p , ` Kent City Council Meeting
U Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
a(oj
1. SUBJECT: ALLEN BOND KENT SELF STORAGE FACILITY
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of the bill of sale and
warranty agreement submitted by Sunup Construction for
continuous maintenance and operation of approximately 72 feet of
sanitary sewer extension constructed at 25223 104th Ave. S.E.
for the Kent Self Storage facility and release of the cash bond
after expiration of the one-year maintenance period.
3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO >( YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
i
S.E. 248TH ST.
515
w
S.E. 252ND
ST.
N SITE
S.E. 256TH ST.
516
VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
ALAN BOND KENT SELF STORAGE FACILITY
NOTE:
DEPTH OF EXIST. UTILITIES
UNKNOWN. POTHOLE PRIOR
TO BORE. of
0
,Aecti
Kent City Council Meeting
ry Date June 18 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN (TIP)
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set July 16 as the date
for a public hearing on the 1992-1998 Six-Year Transportation
Improvement Plan.
3 . EXHIBITS•
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
D. PLANNING COMMITTEE
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
F. PARKS COMMITTEE '
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS f All
/� p
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
May 28, 1991
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Christi Houser, Chair, Operations Committee
Jon Johnson, Operations Committeemember
Paul Mann, Operations Committeemember
Judy Woods
Steve Dowell
Leona Orr
STAFF PRESENT: Dan Kelleher, Mayor
Lin Ball
Ed Chow
Rose Grabert
Jim Hansen
Roger Lubovich
Tony McCarthy
Kelli O'Donnell
Alice Shobe
Janet Shull
Don Wickstrom
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Dean Chaussee
Tom Harader
Morgan Llewellyn
The meeting was called to order at 4:50 p.m. by Chairperson Christi Houser.
Approval of Vouchers
All claims for the period ending May 15, 1991 were approved for payment in the amount of$2,214,471.87.
Joint Use Reservoir Equity Purchase
Public Works Director Wickstrom requested authorization for the final purchase agreement for Water
District 111's equity in the Joint Use Reservoir. The actual purchase price is $664,202.67 which is $60,000
over the 1991 budget due to cost escalations from the cost of living index in accordance with the letter of
understanding. This will be covered by a transfer from the unencumbered water fund.
Committeemember Mann MOVED to authorize the final purchase agreement for Water District 111's equity
in the Joint Use Reservoir. Committeemember Johnson SECONDED the motion which passed with a vote
of 3-0. The item was forwarded to the Consent Calendar of the next City Council Meeting.
Golf Operational Audit
Finance Director McCarthy reviewed with the Committee proposals received from the Golf Operational
Audit Request for Proposal. McCarthy's rating had changed from his original rating following phone
interviews which resulted in Golf Investment Advisors being his top rated proposal. The majority of the
1
Operations Committee Minutes
May 28, 1991
proposals were from Florida firms including the Golf Investment Advisors whose proposal included $4,000
for travel.
McCarthy reviewed the Cash Investment Report with the Committee for Fund 480 - Golf Complex Fund
as of May 22, 1991. Currently the Golf Complex fund is -$761,973.26. The authorized line of credit is
$700,000. Debt service transfers of interest have been changed to monthly to give a more accurate picture.
1991 hasn't started off well because of the rainy season at the beginning of the year which will hopefully
improve during the remainder of 1991.
McCarthy felt that any improvements suggested by the consultant could quickly offset the cost of the audit.
The Parks Committee had been canceled so Operations Committee was the first committee to discuss the
recommendation.
Committeemember Johnson asked the cost of the audit. McCarthy responded $16,500.
Assistant City Administrator Hansen pointed out the main purpose of the audit was to justify the
assignment of debt to the golf course budget. Chairperson Houser noted that$700,000 was to big of a gap
to overlook. A professional audit would be dollars well spent. Committeemember Johnson asked where
the funding for the audit would come from. McCarthy answered that had not been determined. Options
included the Golf Course Operations or remaining Management Study budget.
Committeemember Mann made a motion to endorse Finance director McCarthy's recommendation for the
consultant. Committeemember Johnson SECONDED the motion which passed with a vote of 3-0. During
further discussion Parks Committee Chair Dowell requested that Parks Committee have the option to pick
the source of funding the audit. It was further decided that the matter would go to the Parks Committee
for review before going to the full City Council.
DAWN Confidential Shelter Program
Janet Shull reviewed with the Committee the DAWN emergency request for funding received by the Kent
Human Services Commission on April 23, 1991. DAWN requested$30,000 in matching funds from the City
for purchase of a confidential shelter for battered women and children. They had received over $200,000
from the County and State which left a shortfall of $30,000. Currently there is no such shelter in our
community and only 38 beds in King County with a need of over 12,000.
The Kent Human Services Commission recommended that a $30,000 emergency allocation be made. The
Council Planning Committee recommended approval of a minimum of$10,000 be granted. The Roundtable
made domestic abuse a priority in 1990. DAWN is also requesting matching funds from other cities. Since
the shelter will be located in Kent, it is critical that matching funds from the City be granted. One of the
large grants from the County Housing Opportunity fund stipulates that matching funds be received from
the city in which it is located.
Chairperson Houser stated that since this had not been included in the 1991 budget, $10,000 was the
maximum the Operations Committee could recommend with the current financial situation of the City.
Committeemember Mann MOVED the Operations Committee recommend approval of $10,000 matching
funds to DAWN,Committeemember Johnson SECONDED the motion McCarthy recommended funding from
the General Fund, the motion passed with a vote of 3-0 to be placed on the Consent Calendar.
Severe Weather Emergency Shelter Program Allocation
2
Operations Committee Minutes
May 28, 1991
Alice Shobe informed the Committee that in February the Planning Committee had asked the Human
Services Commission to evaluate the Severe Weather Emergency Shelter Program and make a funding
recommendation to maintain the emergency shelter program throughout the remainder of 1991. The
review resulted in a recommendation for $2,500 of additional funding on a contingency basis. These
dollars would be used at the end of 1991 if needed. The weather bureau foresees a continuation of the
three year trend of extreme cold.
Committeemember Mann MOVED to recommend approval of an emergency allocation of$2,500 to Catholic
Community Services as a contingency fund to continue the Severe Weather Emergency Shelter Program
through the remainder of 1991 Committeemember Johnson SECONDED the motion which passed with a
vote of 3-0. The item will be placed on the Consent Calendar of the next City Council meeting.
Senior Housing Preliminary Agreement
Assistant City Administrator Hansen reviewed with the Committee an outline for a presentation on the Kent
Senior Housing Project and introduced Mayor Kelleher.
Mayor Kelleher reviewed with the Committee the process used in developing the project. The process was
not the traditional municipal facility site development process where the project is bid out and awarded
to the lowest bidder. Instead, a competitive negotiation process using a Request for Proposal (RFP) was
used. The advantage of that process is the compression of time by choosing a total project as apposed to
a site selection then a developer, etc. The disadvantage is the site and developer are already combined for
the proposal to the City which has the possibility of having a site you like and a developer you don't, etc.
Kelleher explained the technical specifications were set in the RFP which all proposals were required to
comply with. The performance specifications were more flexible and were what the proposal was rated
on. The performance specifications were the experience and reputation of the development team, quality
of the site location and the building design. These criteria were arrived at using the input of the senior
housing committee. The senior housing committee was reconvened to rate the proposals. All previous
members were reappointed and council was invited to join. The senior housing committee reviewed the
proposals, heard presentations from the proposers and then rated the proposals. The number one ranked
proposal was the first to try to negotiate an agreement with Administration.
The Bellewood Corporation and Tom Harader architects were negotiated with to arrive at a tentative
agreement. The process as set out in the RFP stipulates that if an agreement is not reached with the
number one proposer, Administration will attempt to negotiate with the number two proposer. The City
Council has the option of accepting the preliminary agreement with the number one proposer, or throwing
the process out and establishing a new process. Kelleher hoped the last wouldn't happen. The advantage
of quickness can be seen in Renton's senior housing project. They began a year or two previous to the City
of Kent and are still in site zoning.
City Attorney Lubovich reviewed with the Committee the Housing Cooperation Agreement. This agreement
will establish the City's responsibility to build and develop the housing and then transfer it to the King
County Housing Authority. The project would convey back to the City if the Housing Authority ceased
operation or if the City established its own housing authority.
Lubovich then reviewed the Preliminary Agreement with the Committee which is actually an agreement to
agree. By authorizing this agreement the Committee will be accepting the development, developer and
project. Once approved Administration will finish negotiations and present a final agreement to City
3
Operations Committee Minutes
May 28, 1991
Council when reached. The agreement with the Housing Authority is requested to be passed by ordinance.
Councilman Dowell asked about the requirements for senior admission to the housing project. Would it
be for seniors with an income of 50% or 80% of the median income and if the seniors owned property
would that count as part of their income. Mayor Kelleher replied that only interest received from assets
would be counted as income. Seniors with an income that is 80% of the median would be allowed to
reside in the project with preference being given to seniors with an income of 50% or lower.
Councilman Dowell inquired about the appliances in the units. He also asked if arbitration would be more
acceptable to the City than going through the Superior Court system if a disagreement arose. City Attorney
Lubovich stated that the length of time needed to go through litigation worked to the City's benefit also.
Further discussion followed on the benefits of arbitration versus litigation.
Committeemember Mann asked Assistant City Attorney Morris to look at tenant rights and retirement
homes for him. He then MOVED to recommend acceptance of the Housing Cooperation Agreement.
Committeemember Johnson SECONDED the motion and asked if the median income had been determined
yet. Kelleher requested that City Attorney Lubovich check which appliances were included and that the
Support Services Committee check the median income. The motion was then voted on and passed with
a vote of 3-0.
Assistant City Administrator Hansen then introduced Morgan Llewellyn from Rasmussen and Associates to
the Committee. Mr. Llewellyn explained his role as part of the development team. His services were
retained by the developer for site selection and control. Mr. Llewellyn noted the importance of the right
developer for a project. The team of the Bellewood Corporation, developer, and the Harader Mebust
Group, Inc, architect, have the experience of 38 senior housing projects and 13 turnkey projects together.
They recently built 11 out of 14 turnkey projects for the Seattle Housing Authority. One of the benefits
of a turnkey project is that no dollars will be paid until the City is satisfied with the completion of the
project. This puts the burden on the developer to complete the project in a timely manner. This team has
demonstrated the ability to develop and deliver a turnkey project.
Mr. Llewellyn then introduced Dean Chaussee, President of the Bellewood Corporation. Mr. Chaussee
informed the Committee that he had worked with Mr.Harader of the Harader Mebust Group since the early
1970's. He personally had over thirty-one years experience in the area. Tom Harader, President of the
Harader Mebust Group has been involved in senior and special need housing since 1963. He has completed
over 50 projects and 5,000 units of senior housing. Mr. Harader outlined the process they had gone
through in developing their proposal and their goal to provide the most and best senior housing to the City
of Kent.
Committeemember Mann asked about the size of the parking stalls. Mr. Harader informed him that the
stalls were 9 x 19 with an aisle 26 feet wide which is suitable for large cars. Committeemember Mann
asked if 92 stalls were provided. Mr. Harader replied that 49 were provided which is over what the RFP
required and should be more then adequate for the senior population of the housing.
Suzette Cook from the Chamber of Commerce asked what criteria was used for the site selection. The
Chamber Board has some concerns about the growth of the commercial center. Mr. Harader felt that senior
housing usually did well in the urban core. In addition, the RFP requested that the housing be in the
urban core. This site was the best location to achieve the maximum amount of housing with the most open
space.
4
Operations Committee Minutes
May 28, 1991
Mayor Kelleher added that the specifications delineation had been developed through public meetings by
the Senior Housing Committee last year. Some of the criteria included: enhancement of the neighborhood,
closeness of services, City owned property, and maximum parking. The site was rated with a numeric value
of 350 points with the development team and the design each being rated with a maximum of 300 points
so the site was weighted higher then the other two criteria.
After further discussion, Councilman Dowell asked if a traffic study had been completed for 4th and Smith.
Mr. Harader replied that the SEPA review had shown a preliminary recommendation of non-significance
which estimated 39 cars at peak hours. Committeemember Johnson asked if noise levels had been checked.
Assistant City Administrator Hansen noted that SEPA requirements determined setbacks and layout. All
eleven of the proposed sites were on busy streets due to their location in downtown. After further
discussion, Mr. Harader stated he was pleased to be rated as the number one proposer.
Janet Shull of the Planning Department presented the Framework for a Support Services Package to the
Committee. This is an outline of services that could be provided depending on the finance issues and the
need. Lin Ball was appointed Chair of the Support Services Committee to develop a package for the senior
housing project. A host of support services were looked at and the Support Services Committee developed
this framework of services to look at. Some of the services outlined include: Meals, Laundry and personal
care services. This framework will be studied in further depth to determine the cost associated with the
services which may determine feasibility. The final package will be determined over the next month or two
so services will be available when the first seniors move in. Further discussion followed on the age of
seniors who will reside in the project.
Committeemember Mann MOVED to endorse the Framework for a Support services Package.
Committeemember Johnson SECONDED the motion which passed with a vote of 3-0.
Committeemember Johnson MOVED to recommend approval of the Preliminary Agreement and authorize
Administration to negotiate a Contract of Sale to bring back to the City Council. Committeemember Mann
SECONDED the motion which passed with a vote of 3-0.
Mayor Kelleher thanked the Counciimembers present for coming in to hear the presentation.
Committeemember Mann asked the City Attorney to draft an ordinance requiring dimensions of parking
stalls. Lin Ball stated that City Code did state requirements but not for covered parking. Assistant City
Administrator Hansen added that the Planning Director was aware of the situation.
Chairperson Houser adjourned the meeting at 7:05 p.m.
5