HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 01/02/1991 A s" p"wAuw en" ..."" ..".. .",.. "...... �1. .h . 1 1 ..."" .................. ", w.-,..
t
i
I
i y
I ' 1
cultyo €, � nF0, 01ty � , �, tEn
iif
jl � �i�� ee
j A
€� Age
1,R fit; 3
,
I ,
s
1 €e t
A
a 111
Mayor Dark iKi , 1161 her
ll`
,'; i
Council Ors
€ Judy Wood i,' FI , $i d e n t
IY si
;Leona Orr Steve Dowell ',
!Christi Mouser on Johnson
i�; Paul Mann ! Jim White
January
Office of t llork
,. . ,
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
January 2 , 1991 -- .�•�
Summary Agenda
City of Kent Council Chambers
Office of the City Clerk 7:00 p.m.
NOTE: An explanation of the agenda format is given on the
back of this page.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
✓A. Employee of the Month
✓B. Proclamation - Saturday Market Day
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Group Homes - Ordinances
3 . ✓CONSENT CALENDAR
✓A. Minutes
- B. Bills
-C. Appointment to Library Board
D. Plaza by the Green
✓E. LID 337 - Set Hearing Date - Resolution
✓F. Metro Pilot Program
✓G. Parking in Front of Centennial Building - Ordinance
✓H. Arterial Streets Classification
✓I. Frager and Russell Roads Closure
✓J. Water System Plan Addendum - Ordinance
✓K. Fire Resource Mutual Aid Master Agreement
✓L. Acceptance of W. Hill FIre Station and Police Sub-Station
/M. Acceptance of Land Preparation for W. Hill Site
✓N. Interlocal Cooperative Agreement - Parks Dept.
✓O. Special Pops Kitchen Rehab. Acceptance
✓P. CDBG Kiwanis Tot Lot Acceptance
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
✓A. Emergency Slide Repair - Canyon Dr. - 94th Ave.
✓B. Entry Signs
--C. Contract for Fuel
5. BIDS
6. CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
7. REPORTS
8. EXECUTIVE SESSION, IF NECESSARY
9 . ADJOURNMENT
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A. Employee of the Month
i
B. Proclamation - Saturday Market Day
/ V
i
fJ Kent City Council Meeting
`v Date January 2 . 1991
Category Public Hearings
1. SUBJEET: GROUP HONES .
- - - -SUMMARY--- TATEMENT: On October 2, 1990 the City Council held
a public meeting to consider the recommendations by the Planning
Commission concerning zoning code changes for group homes. The
City Council adopted the recommendations by the Planning
Commission on proposed zoning changes for Class I and II Group
Homes but deleted the reference to Class III .which was sent
back to the Planning Committee for further considerationf .
Ordinances have been prepared to include the proposed amendments
to Class I and II Group Homes as previously adopted and proposed
zoning changes for Class III group homes as recommended by the
Planning Committee.
3. EXHIBITS: Memo; City Council m4nutes of October 2, 1990,
November 20, 1990 and December 4, 1990 ; ordinances
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Plannin .Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCALLPERS6NNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL FISCpAI�pERSONNEL NOTE, Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE EXPENDITURE REOUIUD: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT•
CLOSE HEARING:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
to adopt the attached Ord in es Nos. . 151 and D on
proposed zoning changes f Cl s I. II and III Group Homes.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION'•
Council Agenda
Item No. 2A
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
DATE: December 17, 1990
TO: Mayor
City. Council
FROM: Roger Lubovich, City Attorney ���
Carol Morris, Assistant City Attorn
SUBJECT: CITY ATTORNEY'S PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS T OUP HOMES ZONING CODE
AMENDMENT
Recent research on the issue of group homes in the context of our zoning code
amendments disclosed that the definitions of Group Homes I, II and III needed
to be rewritten in order to comply with the Fair Housing Act. In addition, we
anticipated enforcement problems associated with both the definitions and the
licensing scheme as proposed. To avert these problems, we are suggesting
certain modifications to the amendments, and these changes have been
incorporated into the ordinance.
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discriminatory land use and zoning practices
that restrict or eliminate housing choices for handicapped people. Included
within the definition of "handicapped" in the Act are mental and physiological
disorders such as drug addiction, (other than addiction caused by current,
illegal use of a controlled substance) and alcoholism. As a result, these
individuals/groups must be included within our Group Homes I classification,
which would allow them to site a facility in a residential neighborhood
without obtaining a conditional use permit. (Note: We are still retaining
the distinction between residential facilities and "treatment" facilities.
The latter would not be permitted outright in a residential neighborhood.)
For all other groups not covered by the Fair Housing Act's definition of
handicapped, the city can either permit group homes outright or conditionally,
depending upon the actual impacts the home will have on the particular area or
zone. The remaining groups identified in Class II and III are juveniles and
adults under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system, and a decision
was made to permit them only in certain zones, subject to conditional use
permit, separation, dispersion and licensing requirements.
A further distinction was made between these groups; or to subject individuals
convicted of: 1) crimes against property with a sexual motivation; 2) violent
crimes; or 3) convicted or charged as a sexual or assaultive violent predator,
to the heightened restrictions of Class III .
This office, however, raised the concern that since individuals convicted of
these crimes would be housed in the same facility with other offenders, it
would be difficult for the City to regulate and enforce the Group Homes III
classification. Although eligibility is somewhat restricted on the basis of
the type of offense, it does not appear that the Secretary of Corrections (who
is charged with making work release eligibility determinations) recognizes the
City's list of prior offenses in either the initial selection of inmates for
participation in the work release program, determining placement within a
particular facility, or in licensing the facility itself.
Under the old Group Homes II and III classifications, a problem could arise if
an applicant for a work release facility or juvenile detention home initially
asserts that the residents of the facility have not been convicted of these
identified offenses, but after resident turnover, new residents do have such
criminal records. The City's attempts to revoke the conditional use permit
based upon the change in the resident population would likely be viewed by the
state as an objectionable interference with its validly licensed facility.
In order to avert this possibility, this office recommends that the definitions
of Class II and III Group Homes be changed. Juvenile residents of group
facilities may need to attend public schools, so the Class II siting within
residential areas should be maintained for this group. Class III Group Homes
are sited away from residential areas, and thus are more appropriate for the
adult offenders.
Planning Department research on this issue has disclosed that some group homes
cater to the type of resident who has committed the offenses listed above, and
that these residents may be either juvenile or adult. This office therefore
proposes that language be inserted into the definition allowing the Planning
Director the discretion to decide whether a group home for juveniles, which
- 2 -
would otherwise be typed Class II, should instead be Class III because of the
type of the juveniles' prior offenses.
Finally, this office proposes that the requirement of a "license" for Class II
and III Group Homes be revised by providing that the Planning Department
obtain the same information from an applicant through a "registration"
process. The major difference with this approach is that the usual licensing
scheme involves fees, revocation, penalties and an appeals process, while
registration will be a prerequiste and/or a supplement to the conditional use
permit application. The rationale behind this is again to prevent any state
claim of an objectionable interference with operation of a state-operated
facility by our local "license" revocation.
We can however, condition our permit on the facility's acquisition and
continuing renewal of any state and/or federal license necessary for
operation. The language proposed by this office would require that the
applicant additionally provide copies of all such license to the City, and
that the City may verify the accuracy of all information contained in the
registration.
6447L-31L
- 3 -
October . 2, 1990
WALKWAY the area dark, and that they have gone up in the
VACATION last year. McCaughan responded that the fences are
necessary to keep pedestrians off private property.
There were no further comments and JOHNSON MOVED to
close the public hearing. Woods seconded and the
motion carried. WHITE THEN MOVED that action on
this application be deferred and that the matter be
sent to the Public Works Committee so that a solu-
tion can be worked out. Woods seconded and the
motion carried.
REZONE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
Minshull/Wagner Rezone. ADOPTION of Ordinance No.
2945 approving this rezone in accordance with
Council action on September 18th and August 21st.
PRELIMINARY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
PLAT Westbrook Commerce Center Time Extension. APPROVAL
of a one-year time extension for the Westbrook
Commerce Center Preliminary Plat, as recommended by
staff.
ZONING CODE (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
AMENDMENTS - Group Homes - Planning Commission Recommendations.
GROUP HOMES This meeting has been established to consider
recommendations made by the Planning Commission to
the City Council concerning zoning code changes for
group homes. The Planning Commission made their
recommendations after considering the Group Homes
Committea' s final report.
Rebecca Solomon, who chaired the Mayor' s committee,
noted that details of the Planning Commission' s
recommendations were shown in Exhibit A,. distribut-
ed as a part of- the packet. Janet Shull explained
the proposed changes including:
o Recommendations to add definitions in the zoning code for
family and Class I, II, and III group homes, including a
siting matrix and dispersion/separation requirements.
o A proposed licensing and monitoring program and
conditional use permit criteria for Class II and III
group homes, and,
o background information on the proposed licensing,
monitoring and condition use permit criteria.
6
October 2, 1990
ZONING CODE The final report of the Mayor' s Advisory Committee
AMENDMENTS - on Group Homes was distributed with the agenda and
GROUP HOMES contains the findings and the recommendations of
tt..e committee. The recommendations are as follows:
Action Item One: Amend the current Kent Zoning Code to Implement the following:
A. Definition of Family
B. Dellnlilon of Class I, II and III Group Homes
C. Group Homes Siting Matrix
D. Separation and Dispersion Requirements for Class II and III Group Homes
Key Players: Planning Department Staff, Planning Commissioners, and City
Councilmembers.
Target Date: City Council adopts Fall, 1990
Action Item Two: Establish Conditional Use Permit Criteria for Group Homes.
Key Players; Planning Department Staff, Planning Commissioners, and City
Councilmembers.
Target Date: dity Councils adopts In early 1991
Action Item Three: Establish Licensing and Monitoring Systems.
This Action Item Includes assigning a staff person to the monitoring of group homes
once the licensing and monitoring systems are in place.
Key Players: Planning Department Staff, Planning Commissioners, and City
Councilmembers.
Target Date: Have systems in place by end of 1991.
Shull explained that Class I group homes could be
for developmentally disabled and/or handicapped and
could be located in a single family residential
zone.
Class II was described as groups of juvenile of-
fenders and people undergoing rehabilitation for
drug or alcohol abuse. This class could be located
in multi-family or commercial zones. Class III
would cover those convicted of a violent crime, or
sexual predator.
Shull noted that Class II & III are subject to the
separation and dispersion requirements and- must
meet the criteria established for the conditional
use requirements.
In answer, to questions from the Council, she deter-
mined that these regulations would allow Class III
only in commercial or industrial zones and
October 2 , 1990
ZONING CODE further that both II & III would require licenses,
AMENDMENTS - similar to business licenses and would be
GROUP HOMES monitored.
Linda Martinez, chair of the Planning Commission,
pointed out that outright banning of group homes is
not permitted and that the guidelines were estab-
lished so that the Hearing Examiner would know what
the Commission wanted. Commissioner Tracy Faust
pointed out that group homes could not be excluded
from the city but could be regulated. She suggest-
ed that Kent is the first city to propose control-
ling the group homes by establishing regulations.
She suggested to White that the license fees could
pay for the cost of monitoring. Fred Satterstrom
of the Planning Department stated that monitoring
would be done more than annually and especially so
if any complaints are received. Faust pointed out
that we are talking about a zoning matter not a
policing matter. Shull pointed out that the state
would be responsible also for monitoring. Chief
Frederiksen noted that the Police Department is
required to evaluate the criminal record of any
Class III participant. Both Mann and White object-
ed to Class III. Faust noted that if we had no
Class III , those who came under that category would
be permitted in Class II , which could mean sexual
predators in apartments. White suggested that if a
sizable bond were required for Class III groups,
applicants might be scarce.
JOHNSON MOVED to accept the Planning Commission' s
recommendation regarding proposed zoning changes
for group homes but to delete the reference to
Class III. Mann seconded. Woods offered as a
friendly amendment, to send Class III back for
further consideration, but this was rejected as a
friendly amendment. The motion and second were
withdrawn and ORR MOVED to adopt the recommenda-
tions on proposed zoning changes for Class I and II
and to include III as a class, subject to modifica-
tion by the Planning Committee before being fully
adopted. Houser seconded.
It was clarified for Dowell that this committee was
appointed by the Mayor, and that a question of
zoning for a group home at James and Alvord pointed
out the need for clarification of the Kent code.
8
October 2, 1990
ZONING CODE Solomon noted that the Fair Housing Act of 1988 had
AMENDMENTS - motivated the study and the resulting recommenda-
GROUP HOMES tions. White and Mann noted that they could not
support the motion. White suggested an amendment
to change the definition of a family unit back to
its original wording, to require licensing for
Class I group homes and to require a minimum
$1, 000, 000 bond for all Class II homes to assure
compliance with the rules. His suggestion was not
supported and his motion to table the matter
failed, with only Dowell, Mann and White supporting
it. White noted that the proposal needs further
work before he could support it.
Russell Swenson of 3714 S . 239th, stated that the
federal government is bringing criminally insane
prisoners to the local prisons, and in turn local
prisoners are being released into society, increas-
ing the need for group homes. He stated that there
is money to be made in the group homes programs.
Greg Wingard favored the program, stating that we
need rules to deal with particular situations.
Don Knapp spoke against Class III homes in residen-
tial areas.
Floyd Bacon stated that Kent did not have to be the
pilot program and that he had objection to Class I .
Don Pugerude feared that Kent would become popular
as a place for group homes.
Mayor Kelleher reiterated that the motion had to do
only with Class I and Class II .
Jean Alexander, 11808 SE 236th, spoke in favor of
group homes for the developmentally disabled.
Mann noted that he could support Class I and Class
II. Dowell stated that he had no problem with
having a handicapped neighbor but objected - to a
group home in a residential neighborhood. He read
the definition of Group Homes, Class I, to be
permitted outright, noting much leeway is allowed
for groups as large as 10 people. White asked that
9
October 2, 1990
ZONING CODE the City Attorney research the legality of requir-
AMENDMENTS ing a cash bond for Class II since this group would
GROUP HOMES include recovering alcoholics and drug users wheth-
er they were in the program as volunteers or not.
Orr clarified that Class II would require a license
and would be monitored. Dowell noted that the
members of the advisory committee all had something
to do with handicapped in one way or another.
Rebecca Solomon stated that other citizens also
served ' on this committee. Orr complimented the
committee and the Planning Department for all of
the work over many months. Upon a roll call vote,
Orr' s motion passed with Dowell, Mann and White
voting against.
Upon Janet Shull ' s question, Orr clarified that the
Planning Commission' s recommendations were accepted
as they pertained to Class I and Class II _and to
acknowledge Class III as a category but to defer
action on Class III.
POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
Drinking Driver Task Force. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of
donations to the Task Force for support of the
Parent Education Program activities as follows:
Bell-Anderson Agency, Inc. - $100
Mountain High Burger Company - $50
Scenic Hill PTA - $100
FIRE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Station 76 . ACCEPTANCE of Fire Station 76 as
complete, under the Mar Jon contract.
MAYOR'S (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
POSITION Administrative Restructuring/Mayor's Pay. At the
Council meeting on August 21, 1990, Councilmember
Johnson proposed that the structure of the City's
Administrative Section be changed, and moved that
his proposal be referred to the City' s Management
Study Committee. Councilmember Mann stated that he
would have an alternate proposal and MOVED to table
Johnson' s motion until he could present his alter-
nate proposal. Mann's proposal is in the form of a
resolution which leaves the Mayor' s position part-
time and increases the annual compensation.
10
upr of n¢
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
November 20, 1990 4 : 30 PM
Committee Members Present Planning Staff
Christi Houser Lin Ball
Jon Johnson, Chair Jim Harris
Leona Orr Margaret Porter
Fred Satterstrom
Janet Shull
Other City Staff
Roger Lubovich
Alana Mclalwain
Carol Morris
HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE UPDATE (Lin Ball)
Senior Planner Ball did not have an update at this meeting.
HOMELESS PERSONS IN KENT (Information Only)- (Lin Ball)
Senior Planner Ball reported that after a discussion with and approval from
Mayor Dan Kelleher, staff worked on this project. Ms. Ball stated a
nonprofit agency that provides emergency and transitional housing approached
the City asking whether the City would consider opening City facilities or
other ways to address the need of homeless persons during severe weather
conditions. Ms. Ball stated homeless persons would be allowed into the
shelter at night and would be leave the building by 7 : 00 am the next day.
She further clarified this by stating this is not a permanent situation like
the Niki area but only for severe weather conditions to save lives.
A meeting has been set for Wednesday, November 21, 1990, at 8: 30 am in the
second floor conference room to bring together interested parties to address
the problem. This will be a brainstorming session to discuss what can be
done and how the City and community can work together. One giaestion that
will be on the agenda is whether it is feasible to open City buildings as
well as the alternative of using the three churches located in the downtown
area. The ministers from these churches will be at the meeting.
This is an urgent. matter because of the possibility of severe weather
occurring in the near future. In Seattle, the severe weather procedures for
sheltering homeless people goes into effect when the temperature reaches 350 .
1
Planning Department
City Council Planning Committee
November 20, 1990
However, this year, the severe weather program is being implemented nightly
from October to March irregardless of temperature. It is hoped that by the
next meeting a resolution or plan can be presented to the Committee in order
to have some type of severe weather procedures in place as soon as possible.
Attorney Carol Morris commented the insurance liability precautions should be
considered.
Planning Director Jim Harris commented that not doing anything regarding this
need is not one of the option being considered. There is a large problem
existing in the area and the churches in the area might have to carry the
major burden. The Kent food bank can identify the homeless persons eligible
for the program.
GROUP HOMES CLASS III (LAW DEPARTMENT)
Attorney Roger Lubovich reviewed the request by City Council that the
Planning Committee reassess the Group III classification. ' The city Council
approved Group Classes I and II and Class III with conditions to be reviewed
by the Planning Committee and returned to the City Council `ter
recommendation.
Mr. Lubovich and the Law Department reviewed the proposal and the report. He
stated there was difficulty with Group II. Mr. Lubovich stated some of the
classifications in Group II are protected should belong in Group I. In
operating with the State there would be trouble in making a distinction
between the remainder of the classes in Group II and those in Group III.
Mr. Lubovich commented that for example the State in its work release
facilities will not make a distinction between a car thief and a sexual
predator. Therefore, the State will not abide by Kent zoning distinctions;
i.e. , Kent has a requirement that car thieves go in one category in a
different location than a sexual predator. The State will not do that. The
State would follow their own scenario for placing individuals in these
facilities.
Basically, it becomes a problem with criminal justice. The -State will follow
our zoning allocations and our basic zoning requirements but again they are
not going to allow us to regulate who goes in and out of each, particular
facility. So fundamentally there isn't a Group II category at this time.
Group II is being revised to determine if there is any category that can stay
as Group II because of some juvenile facilities. The question was raised
that juveniles cannot be in an industrial area because they need to be near
schools. The Law Department is trying to determine if Group II is can be
salvaged. The Law Department asked an outside counsel to reviewed the Group
II category. In addition, because of the changes being caused by the change
in Group II, Group III will also be affected.
2
Planning Department
City Council Planning Committee
November 20, 1990
Attorney Carol Morris commented on the licensing requirement. The Law
Department did have outside counsel review this requirement. It was
determined to continue with the licensing program as previously outlined with
the exception of the revocation that would normally accompany a business
license.
Mr. Lubovich said that one option the Law Department came up with is using
the licensing requirements as a condition on a conditional use permit. • There
is a lot of interest in having a licensing requirement that is separate and
distinct. It can be implemented but there might be an enforcement problem.
The City can get the information requested for the license from the State
when the State gathers their information to set up these facilities. The
potential problem that can come up is when information needs to be updated to
renew a license, the licensee may not wish to give this updated information.
The license cannot be revoked for failure to give updated information.
Attorney Carol Morris stated that recovering alcoholics, or those formerly
addicted to legal or illegal drugs should be included in Group I. She
mentioned the Federal Fair Housing Act has had some recent amendments that
would make this group of people protected and; therefore, we cannot
discriminate in our zoning for placement of housing.
Mr. Lubovich stated that some changes need to be made and he recommends that
the entire package be taken back to Council .
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom stated that it is unfortuante that this
project has gone this far and now changes need to be made. The initial
project started about one-and-a-half to two years ago by a, committee formed
by Mayor Kelleher. Staff had worked very closely with the law department and
the law department interpretated State law and the group classifications were
made on those interpretations. However, now, the current law department
personnel are intrepretating later case law and the housing for former drug
and alcohol people is judged to be a protected class of housing. Mr.
Statterstrom suggested that this item be taken to the City Council as opposed
to sending it back to the City Council Committee or the Planning Commission.
Mr. Lubovich suggested this item be brought back to the City Council as a
.public hearing. A general discussion insued.
Planning Director James Harris remarked that a lot of time and effort was
spent on this project. Mr. Harris felt it would not be feasible to drop
back to requiring conditional use permits. He said if we do not do anything
and it becomes allowable under a conditional use permit, it will be appealed
to the City Council one way or the other.
Council Chair Jon Johnson felt that a presentation should be made that would
clarify the groupings of what would specifically be in Group I, Group II and
3
Planning Department
City Council Planning Committee
November 20, 1990
Group III so that the Planning Committee can bring this recommendation to the
City Council as a public hearing and then take action.
Mr. Harris reminded the Committee that we are not plowing new ground because
the City Council members have already voted, but what would be done is
opening this vote and saying there are corrections to be made to your last
vote. As the Attorney's office reviews the action the Council took based on
recommendations, we find there needs to be some changes so all that needs to
be done is to open that part up. The Attorney's office will be directed to
draw up an ordinance.
The direction that was agreed upon by the Committee was to set a date at the
December 4, City Council meeting to have a public hearing on December 18,
1990. If there isn't a meeting it would be scheduled for January 2, 1991,
This can come back to the Planning Committee on December 4, 1990.
DEDICATION OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE IN PLATS (F. Satterstrom)
Planning Manager Fred Satterstrom reviewed the proposal explained in the
agenda packet that the City of Kent develop its own ordinance requiring lend
dedication or fees-in lieu of land dedication for parks and open space , . a
subdivisions. If the Committee is interested in this the Planning Department
would work with the Law and Parks Departments in coming forward with . a
proposed ordinance, which would require a Zoning Code amendment to be
implemented by going to the Planning Commission. Mr. Satterstrom mentioned
that the Parks Department is very supportive of this item.
Councilmember Christi Houser asked who would decides whether a developer
builds a park or whether the developer pays money.
Planning Director James Harris explained the Planning Department would be
working with the Parks Department and others. This would be a
recommendation on a preliminary plat that is heard by .the Hearing Examiner
and the Hearing Examiner makes recommendation to City Council. The Planning
Department does not decide but a recommendation may be made. The Hearing
Examiner makes a recommendation in approving the preliminary plat and then it
would go to the City Council for approval. For example, a plat with 15
conditions, one recommended condition may be set aside a 72 square feet lot
for a mini-park. Mr. Harris explained that State Law says that' we "shall"
set aside open space. It doesn't say we might or could, just we "shall" .
Under 2929 , any payment has to be tied to something that is adjacent to that
plat or nearby that plat.
Chair Jon Johnson stated that all was agreed that the Committee is interested
in pursuing this further.
4
Planning Department
City Council Planning Committee
November 20, 1990
ADDED ITEM - NORTH PARK LOTS (R. Lubovich)
Attorney Lubovich reviewed the action taken at the November 6, 1990 Planning
Committee meeting to go ahead and do the administrative procedure (Option #3)
to rescind the lot line adjustment. Mr. Lubovich explained right after that
meeting he was informed that along with rezoning in February 1990, there was
a nonconforming lot line ordinance amendment. Basically, that amendment
allowed lots, such as the 40 feet wide North Park Plaza to be basically
complied with the City's R1. 5 zoning because they require 50-foot lots. The
amendments that occurred with the rezone allowed Mr. Heutmaker's lots to
comply with R1.5 zoning. The question that comes up as the problem at the
time that happened, the Council and nobody knew that Mr. Heutmaker had
already done a lot line adjustment to 1o, 000 square feet. The point is that
Mr. Heutmaker did not have a nonconforming lot at the time the amendment was
done. Therefore, if he rescinds and we go through this process that was
recommended by the Committee to rescinding the lot line adjustments, it is
quite possible that he goes back to 40-foot lots, which means it may not be
in compliance with current zoning for R1. 5 .. Mr. Lubovich was hoping to have
an answer today to determine what effect the lot line adjustment Mr.
Heutmaker did a year ago has on the nonconforming amendment that was done in
February 1990. Mr. Lubovich will report at the December 4th meeting.
ADDED ITEM - MOBILE HOME SPACE REQUIREMENTS (L. Orr)
Councilmember Leona Orr commented that at one of the Council meetings Jack
Heck asked what was being done about this item. Ms. Orr stated according to
the ordinance regarding lot widths, currently, two mobile homes must move out
of a park before one can move in. Ms. Orr commented the City is causing
affordable housing to be lost as well as causing hardship to the owners of
current mobile home parks who are loosing revenue. Ms. Orr asked if it would
be possible to have the existing mobile home parks grandfathered and the new
lot width requirements only be for new mobile home parks. This item will be
discussed next year.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5: 35 p.m.
5
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
December 41 1990 4 :30 PM
Committee Members Present Planning Staff
Jon Johnson, Chair Lauri Anderson
Leona Orr Lin Ball
Judy Woods, President Jim Harris
Margaret Porter
Fred Satterstrom
Janet Shull
Other City Staff Other Ouests
Roger Lubovich Lyle Price
Carol Morris
HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE UPDATE (Lin Ball)
Senior Planner Ball did not have an update at this meeting.
SEVERE WEATHER SHELTER FOR HOMELESS (Lin Ball)
Senior Planner Ball reviewed a proposal that came to the Planning Committee
in response to a need that was voiced by the Human Services providers in our
community and also recognized by our Human Services Commission and by City
Staff. Ms. Ball stated a number of homeless in Kent is growing and the
. agencies are seeing an increasingly number of persons that are being turned
away each night either due to their facilities being at capacity or riot
.having appropriate facilities to send the homeless to. For instance, there
is no shelter for single men in all South King County. In response to this
request for help, the Planning Department by working with the Human Services
Commission pulled together to form a task force to look at addressing this
need to provide severe weather emergency shelter. The committee members
involved consist of a broad spectrum of coalition of representatives from
Human Services Commission, Kent area churches, Human Services providers in
the community, and a number of other City departments.
The task force developed a proposal which was included in your packet. Ms.
Ball clarified the different groups that the proposal is dealing with, such
as single women, single men, and families.
1
Planning Department
City Council Planning Committee
December 4 , 1990
The resolution that was attached in the packet is being recommended to the
committee by the task force and the Human services Commission. Ms. Ball
explained Sections 1 - 4 of the City's response for providing emergency
shelter during severe weather conditions as follows:
Section 1 - This refers to "emergency severe weather shelter crisis"
for nights in which the temperature is at or below 35
degrees fahrenheit.
Section 2 - This refers to providing the use of city building space
for shelter or other religious institution and/or private
sector.
Section 3 - This refers to the City shall contracting with a non-
profit human service agency approved by Kent Human
Services Commission, such as staffing for screening,
monitoring the shelter during the evening hours, security
and janitorial services.
Section 4 - This refers to the Human Services Commission considering
this proposal at their November 29th -meeting and they
recommended that their emergency funding of $15, 418 be
used to finance this emergency shelter. This money would
be used to pay for the staffing and also to buy the
motel/hotel vouchers.
Chair Mary Ecklund attended the meeting to offer his support to this
proposal. He explained the severity of the conditions in the area, for
example, between November 12 - 16 the food bank helped 20 households who were
homeless, 28 adults, and four children. On November 28th, there were four
households who were homeless, which included two individuals that were living
on the street, one individual living in a car, and one family of two parents
and two children. This information from the food bank gives an indication
that the conditions are more severe than we have had before.
Councilwomen Leona Orr made the MOTION and Council President SECONDED that
the Planning Committee take the amended recommendation for approval to full
City Council on December 4 , 1990 of allocation of $15,418 of emergency fund
to provide emergency shelter for the homeless during severe weather
conditions and recommendation of approval of a resolution outlining the
city's commitment to respond to the need for emergency severe weather shelter
for individuals and families. The amendment was is in Section 3 inserting
the highlighted word, "emergency severe shelter services" .
2
h
crry of Red
ar.Tk CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
December 4 , 1990 4 : 30 PM
Committee Members Present Planning Staff
Jon Johnson, Chair Lauri Anderson
Leona Orr Lin Ball
Judy Woods, President' Jim Harris
Margaret Porter
Fred Satterstrom
Janet Shull
Other City Staff Other Ouests
Roger Lubovich Lyle Price
Carol Morris
HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE UPDATE (Lin Ball)
Senior •Planner Ball did not have an update at this meeting.
SEVERE WEATHER SHELTER FOR HOMELESS (Lin Ball)
Senior Planner Ball reviewed a proposal that came to the Planning Committee
in response to a need that was voiced by the Human Services providers in our
community and also recognized by our Human Services Commission and by City
Staff. Ms. Ball stated a number of homeless in Kent is growing and the
agencies are seeing an increasingly number of persons that are being turned
away each night either due to their facilities being at capacity or not
having appropriate facilities to send the homeless to. For instance, there
is no shelter for single men in all South King County. In response to this
request for help, the Planning Department by working with the Human Services
Commission pulled together to form a task force to look at addressing this
need to provide severe weather emergency shelter. The committee members
involved consist of a broad spectrum of coalition of representatives from
Human Services Commission, Kent area churches, Human Services providers in
the community, and a number of other City departments.
The task force developed a proposal which was included in your packet. Ms.
Ball clarified the different groups that the proposal is dealing with, such
as single women, single men, and families.
1
Planning Department
City Council Planning Committee
December 4, 1990
The resolution that was attached in the packet is being recommended to the
committee by the task force and the Human Services Commission. Ms. Ball
explained Sections 1 - 4 of the City's response for providing emergency
shelter during severe weather conditions as follows:
Section 1 - This refers to "emergency severe weather shelter crisis"
for nights in which the temperature is at or below 35
degrees fahrenheit.
Section 2 - This refers to providing the use of city building space
for shelter or other religious institution and/or private
sector.
Section 3 This refers to the City shall contracting with a non-
profit human service agency approved by Kent Human
Services Commission, such as staffing for screening,
monitoring the shelter during the evening hours,. security
and janitorial services.
Section 4 - This refers to_ the Human Services Commission considering
this proposal at their November 29th meeting and th
recommended that their emergency funding of $15,418
used to finance this emergency shelter. This money would
be used to pay for the staffing and also to buy the
motel/hotel vouchers.
Chair Mary Ecklund attended the meeting to offer his support to this
proposal. He explained the severity of the conditions in the area, for
example, between November 12 - 16 the food bank helped 20 households who were
homeless, 28 adults, and four children. On November 28th, there were four
households who were homeless, which included two individuals that were living
on the street, one individual living in a car, and one family of two parents
and two children. This information from the food bank gives an indication
that the conditions are more severe than we have had before.
Councilwomen Leona Orr made the MOTION and Council President SECONDED that
the Planning Committee take the amended recommendation for approval to full
City Council on December 4 , 1990 of allocation of $15,418 of emergency fund
to provide emergency shelter for the homeless during severe weather
conditions and recommendation of approval of a resolution outlining the
City's commitment to respond to the need for emergency severe weather shelter
for individuals and families. The amendment was is in Section 3 inserting
the highlighted word, "emergency severe shelter services" .
2
Planning Department
City Council Planning Committee
December 4, 1990
GROUP HOMES CLASS III (LAW DEPARTMENT)
City• Attorney Roger Lubovich stated that there has not been any changes on
this issue from the last meeting. He recapped that since the legal
department got into this matter at the latter end of the project, the Law
Department had to do their own review of the proposal and report. This
additional review has raised the following areas of concern and discussion:
1. Screening of individuals
2 . Dispersion - 1, 000 to 3, 000 feet for Group III
3 . The licensing requirements
4 . The type of homes established under each of the three
classifications.
The direction given to the Law Department from the Planning Committee was for
Class II to be primarily juvenile, drug and alcohol rehabilitation persons,
for Class III for more violent State run facilities. A draft ordinance will
be drawn up to be presented for approval at the January 2, 1990 Public
Hearing to the City Council.
NORTH PARK LOTS (R. Lubovich)
Attorney Roger Lubovich explained that research is now completed to determine
what effect the lot line adjustment Mr. Heutmaker did a year ago has on the
nonconforming amendment that was done in February 1990. Mr. Lubovich
reported that there is no change from the initial decision. This procedure
can be done administratively according to Option #3 (Rescission of Lot Line
Adjustment Approval) , which was moved and seconded at the November 6, 1990
Planning Committee meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5: 45 p.m.
3
i
II
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, providing for the application, fee
and annual renewal of a City registration of
Group Homes II and III, as a pre-requisite for
conditional use permit approval, all as set
forth- in the Kent Zoning Code (Ordinance 1827,
2404) Section 15. 08.280 (D) and 15. 09. 030 (D) (9) .
WHEREAS, on October 2 , 1990 and January 2 , 1991, the Kent
City Council approved amendments to the Kent Zoning Code to add a
definition of Class II and III Group Homes; to regulate their
siting within the City zoning districts by separation, dispersi"
and the conditional use permitting process; and further approved'
the establishment of an applicable registration program for Group
Homes II and III; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Class II and III Group Homes
registration program as authorized by the Kent City Council is to
aid the City in its implementation of the separation, dispersion,
and conditional use Zoning Code requirements as set forth in Kent
City Code §§ 15. 08 . 280 (D) and 15 . 09 . 030 (D) (9) ; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Scope. The following are defined as Group
Homes, ' Class 'I"I and III under the Kent Zoning Code, and are
subject to the requirements of this Ordinance:
i
Class II Group Home: publicly or privately operated
residential facilities for juveniles under the jurisdiction of the
criminal justice system. These homes include state-licensed group
care homes or half-way homes for juveniles, which provide
residence in lieu of sentencing or incarceration, half-way houses
providing residence to juveniles needing correction or for
juveniles selected to participate in state operated work release
and pre-release programs. The Planning Director shall have the
' discretion to classify a group home proposing to serve ' Ies
convicted of the offenses listed in Class III below
Home Class III, and any such home shall be sited ai
regulations contained within the Group III classif
i
1. Group Home, Class II-A -- a maximum of 8 residents
including resident staff.
2 . Group Home, Class II-B -- a maximum of 12 residents
including resident staff.
3 . Group Home, Class II-C -- a maximum of 18 residents
including resident staff.
Class III Group Homes: privately or publicly operated
residential facilities for adults under the jurisdiction of the
criminal justice system who have entered a pre- or post-charging
diversion program, or selected to participate in state operated
work/training release or other similar programs. Such groups also
involve individuals who have been convicted of a violent crime
against a person, a crime against property with a sexual
1 motivation and convicted or charged as a sexual or assaultive
violent predator.
Section 2 . Governmental Agencies Not Exempt. The City
recognizes the fact that a Group Home Class II or III facility may
be operated, funded or licensed by a governmental agency. This
2 -
1'
I I
ii
i
ordinance is intended to require any Group Home II or III facility
operated by a local municipal corporation, agency or division of
the state, or an agency of the federal government, regardless of
whether such facility must obtain a state or federal license for
I
operation to also register such group home with the City of Kent.
Section 3 . Registration required application. No
person, firm, corporation association, governmental agency,
nonprofit organization or other organization shall operate any
Group Home Class II or III without registering such facility with
the City of Kent. The application for the registration shall be
as follows:
1 A. Application. The application shall be in writing on
a form to be provided by the Kent Planning Department. The
applicant shall not knowingly make any false statement in an
application, or fail to immediately notify the Kent Planning
Department of any change in the information contained in the
application. The application shall contain not less than the
following information:
1. The name, address and telephone number of the
applicant. If the applicant is an association or organization of
any kind, the names, addresses and phone numbers of the director
and a contact person at the sponsoring agency shall be provided.
2 . The name, address and phone number of, the Group
Home. Two emergency contact names and phone numbers shall also be
named.
3 . The King County Property Parcel Number(s) of the
property on which the Group Home is located, and the Washington
State Tax Identification Numbers shall be provided.
3 -
III
l
I
4 . The date the Group Home will begin operating.
5. The type of population served will be identified
(such as adult work release, juvenile detention home, etc. ) .
6. The total number of employees and resident
clients or patients shall be stated.
7. The state, federal, profit or nonprofit
agency(ies) under which the, Group Home is licensed or operating
shall be stated, along with a copy of such license, the agency's
address, contact person, and phone number.
8 . A statement that the person signing the
application has read this ordinance.
B. Registration renewal. Registration of the group
home with the City of Kent must be renewed annually. Renewal
shall not be automatic, but shall require that the applicant
yearly attest to the accuracy of the information contained in the
application form and provide copies of all state and/or federal
license renewals. Changes in registration information shall be
made as required and may be verified by the City of Kent.
Section 4 . Severability. The provisions of this
ordinance are severable, and if any sentence, section or other
part of this ordinance should be found to be invalid, such
invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions, and the
remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect.
I
4 -
I
I
I
II
Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its fins
passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of 1990.
APPROVED the day of 1990.
PUBLISHED the day of , 1990.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No. , passed by the City .Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as here n
indicated.
(SEA
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
09080-320
5 -
I�
O}
ORDINANCE- NO. JP t✓� J
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, relating to land use and zoning;
amending the Zoning Code (Ordinance 1827, 2404)
by amending the definition of family
(§ 15. 02 . 135) , adding a definition of Group
Homes, Class I, II and III (§ 15. 02 . 173) ,
amending certain sections to provide for the
siting of group homes within the City
(§§ 15. 04. 005, . 010, . 020, .030, .040, . 050,
. 060, '.070, .090, .100, . 110, . 120, . 130,
. 140, . 150) , adding a new section to provide
separation, dispersion and registration of
Class II and III Group Homes (§ 15. 08 .280) ; and
amending the types of uses identified under
General Conditional Uses in the Code to
eliminate uses now covered by the Group Homes
classifications (§ 15. 08 . 030) .
WHEREAS, Mayor Kelleher appointed an Advisory Committee
in May of 1989 to review the Official Zoning Code and address the
potential siting of group homes in the City of Kent; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Committee met during May of 1989
through March of 1990 and submitted its findings to the Kent
Planning' Commission in the report entitled--"FINAL REPORT: THE
MAYOR'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON GROUP HOMES" ; and
WHEREAS, Kent City Code (KCC) § 2.32 .050 (Ordinance 2469)
authorizes the Planning Commission to hear and make
recommendations to the City Council on Zoning Code text
amendments; and
a
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of KCC
§ 2 .32 .050 and the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 35A. 63 . 100 (2) ,
public hearings were held before the Planning Commission of the
City of Kent on May 21, June 25 and August 27, 1990 to consider
the Committee's final report and its recommendations; and
WHEREAS, at a public meeting on October 2, 1990, the .Kent
City Council considered and voted to approve recommendations of
the Planning Commission concerning text amendments to the Kent
Zoning Code, establishing the definitions for and siting of group
homes, with the exception of Group III classification conditions
which were sent to the Planning Committee for further review and
recommendations; and
WHEREAS, another public hearing was held on January 2 ,
1991 during which the Kent City Council considered the recommen-
dations of the Planning Committee and the modifications proposed
by the City Attorney on the text amendments, and voted to approve
adoption of the recommendations and modifications as recommended;
NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 15. 02 . 135 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 02 . 135. FAMILY.
� ( (A-person-diving-alone--er-�rre-er-mere-persons
i
enstemari�p-�}ving-�ege�ker-a�-e-singe-hen9ekeeping-snit-anel
tz9ing-eemmen-eee#ing-fae4:iit4:es7-as-elistinguished-frem-a-group
I
- 2 -
eeet�py}ng-e-hates--elab;-basreing-er= eelgng-het�se-) ) One or more
individuals related by blood or legal familial relationship or a
_group of not more than six (6) persons who need not be related by
blood or a legal familial relationship livincr together in a
dwelling unit as a single nonprofit housekeeping unit• excluding
Class II and III Group Homes (as defined in Section 15.02 . 173) .
Section 2. Chapter 15. 02 of the Zoning Code (Ordinance
1827, 2404) is amended by adding a new Section 15. 02 . 173 as
follows:
15. 02 . 173 . GROUP HOME.
A. Class I Group Home• publicly or privat
residential facilities such as state licensed foster Ana
group homes for children• group homes for individuals o are
developmentally, physically or mentally disabled• group homes or
half-way houses for recovering alcoholics and former drug addicts;
and other groups not considered within Class II or III Group Homes.
1. Group Home Class 1-A -- a maximum of 10 1
residents including resident. staff.
2 . Group Home Class 1-B -- a maximum of 14 ?p
residents including resident staff.
3 . Group Home Class 1-C -- the number of residents
jwill be based upon the density of the-,underlying zoning district.
B. Class II Group Home: publicly or privately operated
residential facilities for juveniles under the jurisdiction of the
criminal iustice system These homes include state-licensed group
care homes or half-way homes for juveniles, which provide
residence in lieu of sentencing or incarceration half-way houses
providing residence to juveniles needing correction or for
juveniles selected to participate in state operated work release
3 -
and Pre-release programs The Planning Director shall have the
discretion to classify a group home proposing to serve Juveniles
convicted of the offenses listed in Class III below as a Group
Home Class III and any such home shall be sited according to the
regulations contained within the Group III classification.
1. Group Home Class II-A -- a maximum of 8
residents includina resident staff.
2. Group Home Class II-B -- a maximum of 12
residents including resident staff.
3 . Group Home Class II-C -- a maximum of 18
residents including resident staff.
C. Class III Group Homes: privately or publicly
operated residential facilities for adults under the jurisdiction
of the criminal -justice system who have entered apre- or
l post charging diversion program or been selected to participat
in state operated work/training release or other similar
—Programs. Such groups also involve individuals who have been
convicted of a violent crime against a person a crime against
property with a sexual motivation and convicted or charged as a
sexual or assaultive violent predator.
Section 3 . Section 15. 04 . 005 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 005. AGRICULTURAL - A-1.
A. Principally Permitted Uses ,
1. Agricultural uses, including any customary
agricultural building or structure, such as planting, cultivation
and harvesting of crops, animal husbandry, nurseries and green
houses and other agricultural occupations.
2 . One single-family dwelling per lot.
3 . Group Homes Class. I-A.
4 - f
it
Section 4. Section 15.04. 010 of the Zoning Code
M (Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 .010. RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL - RA.
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. Agricultural uses, including any customary
II agricultural building or structure, such as planting, cultivation
I
and harvesting of crops, animal husbandry, nurseries and
greenhouses and other agricultural occupations.
2. One single-family dwelling per lot.
3 . Group Homes Class I-A.
Section 5. Section 15. 04 . 020 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 020. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS.
D. Principally Permitted Uses
1. One single-family dwelling per lot.
2. Crop and tree farming.
3 . Group Homes Class I-A.
Section 6. Section 15. 04 . 030 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows: ,
P
15. 04 . 030. DUPLEX MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL - MR-D.
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. One single-family dwelling per lot.
2. One duplex per lot.
5 -
Ili
F
i
it 3 . Group Homes Class I-A and I-B.
( (3) ) 4 . Crop and tree farming.
II •x
D. Conditional Uses
1. General Conditional Uses listed in Section
115. 08.030.
2 . Group Homes Class I-C II-A II-B, and II-C.
E�
`I Section 7. Section 15. 04 .040 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
1
15. 04. 040. GARDEN DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL - MR-G
I
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. Single-family dwellings and two-family dwellings
or duplexes:
2 . Multiple family dwellings including apartments
and townhouses.
3 . Group Homes Class I-A and I-B.
( (3) ) 4 . Crop or tree farming.
D. Conditional Uses
1. General Conditional Uses as listed in Section
15. 08 . 030.
2 . Group Homes Class I-C, II-A, II-B and II-C.
Section 8. Section 15.04 . 050 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
6 -
15. 04 . 050. MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL - MR-M
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. Single-family dwellings and two family dwellings
or duplexes.
2. Multiple family dwellings.
3 . Group Homes Class I-A I-B and I-C.
( (3) ) 4. Crop and tree farming.
D. Conditional Uses
1. General Conditional Uses as listed in Section
15. 08.030.
2 . Group Homes Class II-A. II-B_and II-C.
Section 9 . Section 15.04. 060 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 060. HIGH DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL - MR-H.
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. Single-family dwellings and two-family dwellings
or duplexes.
2 . Multiple-family dwellings.
3 . Group Homes Class I-A I-B and I-C.
Crop and tree farming.
D. Conditional Uses
1. General Conditional Uses as listed in Section
15.08 . 030.
2 . Group Homes Class II-A II-B and II-C.
7 -
i
Section 10. Section 15. 04 . 070 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15 04 070 MOBILE HOME PARK COMBINING DISTRICT OR MHP.
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. Mobile Home parks.
2 . Group Homes Class I-A.
F
Section 11. Section 15. 04 . 090 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 090. NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL OR NCC.
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. Any local retail business for the sale of new
merchandise, such as supermarkets, food stores, drugstores,
restaurants (excluding drive-in restaurants) , taverns.
2. Personal services such as barber and beauty
shops, launderettes, dry cleaning establishments.
3 . Any other retail or personal service use that is
determined by the Planning Director to be of the same general
character as the above permitted local retail businesses or
services and is in accordance with the stated purpose of the
district.
4 . Municipal uses and buildings, except fpr such
uses and buildings subject .to Section 15. 04.200.
5. Group Homes Class I-A, I-B and I-C.
I
- 8 -
I
Existing dwellings may be rebuilt, repaired and otherwise
changed for human occupancy. Accessory uses for existing
dwellings may be constructed. Such uses are garages, carports,
storage sheds and fences.
D. Conditional Uses
1. General Conditional Uses as listed in Section
15. 08. 030.
2 . Group Homes Class II-A II-B II-C and III
Section 12. Section 15. 04 . 100 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 100. COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OR CC.
A. Principally Permitted Uses
1. Retail establishments, selling primarily new
merchandise, including convenience goods, shopping goods such as
"soft lines" (clothing, shoes) and "hard lines" (hardware,
furniture, paint, appliances) .
2. Personal services such as barber and beauty
shops, launderettes dry cleaning establishments, television and
radio repair, shoe repair.
3 . Restaurants (excluding drive-in restaurants) ,
taverns.
4 . Veterinary clinics when located no closer than
one hundred fifty (150) feet to any residential use, providing the
animals are housed indoors (no inside runs) and the building is
soundproofed. Soundproofing must be designed by competent
acoustical engineers.
5. Branches of financial institutions.
- 9 -
is
6. Car washes.
7 . Nurseries and greenhouses.
8. Commercial recreational facilities including
theaters, bowling alleys, skating rinks, miniature golf.
9 . Office uses.
10. Group Homes Class I-A I-B and I-C.
( (4e) ) 11. Any other use that is determined by the Planning
Director to be the same general character as the above permitted
uses and is in accordance with the stated purpose of the district.
( (11) ) 12 . Municipal uses and buildings, except for such
uses and buildings subject to .Section 15. 04 ,200.
Existing dwellings may be rebuilt, repaired and otherwise .
changed for human occupancy. Accessory uses for existing
dwellings may be constructed. Such uses are garages, carports,
storage sheds and fences.
D. Conditionally Permitted Uses.
1. General Conditional Uses as listed in Section
15. 08. 030.
2 . Apartments (either by themselves or in
conjunction with commercial uses) , and building supply uses.
3 . Auto repair facilities.
4 . Mini-warehouses. Provided: that the following
development standards shall apply for mini warehouses, superseding
( those set out in 15. 04 . 100 (E) , below.
a. Frontage Use Reserved: The first 150 feet
of lot depth (measured from the property line or right of way
inward from the street frontage) shall be reserved for principally
permitted uses for this district, defined by the provisions of
15. 0,4 . 100 A-1, and/or for office/on-site manager's unit, signage,
parking and access. A maximum of 25% of the frontage may be used
10 -
i
l
I
i
for access to the storage unit area, provided that: in no case
shall the access area exceed 75 feet in width. No storage
units/structures shall be permitted within this 150 feet
commercial frontage depth.
b. Lot Size. Minimum - 1 acre
Maximum - 4 acres
C. Site Coverage. Underlying zoning district
requirements.
d. Setbacks. Front Yard - 20 feet
Side Yard - 10 feet
Rear- Yard - - 10 feet
e. Height Limitations. One story in height.
f. Outdoor Storage. No outdoor storage is
permitted.
g. Signs. The sign requirements of Chapter
15. 06 shall apply.
h. Off-Street Parking.
1. The off-street parking requirements of
Chapter 15. 05 shall apply.
2 . Off-street parking may be located in
required yards except in areas required to be landscaped.
i. Development Plan Review. Development plan
approval is required as provided in Section 15. 08 .
j . Landscaping.
Front Yard - 20 feet: Type III (earth bermsi
Side Yard - 10 feet: Type II abutting
commercial, Type I abutting residential uses or district$.
Rear Yard - 10 feet: Type II abutting
commercial uses or districts, Type I abutting residential uses or
districts.
Note: For maintenance purposes, underground
irrigation systems shall be provided for all landscaped• areas.
- 11 -
fI .
I
III
k. on Site Managers. A resident manager shall
be required on the site and shall be responsible for maintaining
,
the operation of the facility in conformance with the conditions
Hof the approval. The Planning Department shall establish
( requirements for parking and loading areas sufficient to
I accommodate the needs of the resident manager and the customers to
,
the facility.
I
1. Drive Aisles. Drive aisle width and
parking requirements are as follows:
-a. 15 foot drive aisle• and 10 foot
parking aisle.
b. Parking for manager's quarters and
visitor parking.
M. Building Lengths. The horizontal dimension
of any structure facing the perimeter of the site shall be offse+-
at intervals not to exceed 100 feet. The offset shall be no less
than 20 feet in the horizontal dimension, with a minimum depth of
5 feet.
n. Materials Used. If abutting a residential
use or zone, residential design elements such as brick veneer,
wood siding, pitched roofs with shingles, landscaping and
( fencing. No uncomplimentary building colors should be used when
abutting a residential use or zone.
o. Prohibited Uses. Restrict use to "dead
storage" only. Specifically prohibit the following:
i. Auctions (other than tenant lien sales) ,
commercial, wholesale, or retail sales, or garage sales. ,
ii. The servicing, repair, or fabrication
of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers, appliances or
other similar equipment.
iii. The operation of power tools, spray
painting equipment, table saws, lathes, compressors, welding
equipment, kilns or other similar equipment.
12 -
I
is
i
i
iv. The establishment of a transfer and
storage business.
v. Any use that is noxious or offensive
because of odor, dust, noise, fumes, or vibration.
vi. Storage of hazardous or toxic
materials and chemicals, or explosive substances.
p. Fencing., No razor wire allowed on top of
fences.
5. Group Homes Class II-1A, II-B, II-C and III.
Section 13 . Section 15. 04 . 110 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 110. DOWNTOWN COMMERCIAL OR DC.
A. Principally Permitted Uses.
i 1. Retail establishments, including convenience
goods, shopping goods such as "soft lines" (clothing, •variety,
shoes) and "hard lines" (hardware, furniture, appliances) .
2 . Personal services such as barber and beauty
shops, launderettes, dry cleaning, television and radio repair,
shoe repair.
3 . Restaurants (excluding drive-in restaurants) ,
nightclubs, taverns.
4 . Professional, administrative and financial
offices. ,
5. Business and technical schools.
6. Recreational uses such as theaters, bowling
alleys, dance halls (must be enclosed) .
7. Hotels and motels.
13 -
II
j
I
i
8. Printing establishments; business services such
has copy services.
9. Mortuaries.
10. Any other use that is determined by. the Planning
Director to be of the same general character as the above permit-
ted uses and in . accordance with the stated purpose of •the district
11. Existing dwellings may be rebuilt, repaired and
otherwise changed for human occupancy. Accessory uses for
existing dwellings may be constructed. Such uses are garages,
carports, storage sheds and fences.
12 . Municipal uses and buildings, except for such
uses and buildings subject to Section 1.5. 04.200.
13. Group Homes Class I-A, I-B and I-C.
B. Principally Permitted Uses in DC-2 Zone
1. All of the principally permitted uses in the
DC-1 zone.
2 . Automobile wash services.
3 . Food lockers (with or without food preparation
facilities) .
4. Automobile rental services.
5. Sales of tire and auto accessories with on-site
installation.
6. Marine craft sales and accessories.
7. Motor vehicle sales (new and used) .
8. Motion picture distribution and services.
9. Upholstery and furniture repair services.
10. Group Homes Class I-A, I-B and I-C. ,
( (B) ) C. Prohibited Uses. Heavy commercial uses with
outdoor storage are prohibited in this district.
( (E) ) D. Special Permit Uses. The following uses are
permitted provided that they conform to the development standards
listed in Section 15. 08. 020.
- 14 -
1
I
I
1. Churches.
2 . Nursery schools and day care centers.
3 . Gasoline service stations in DC-2 zone only.
( (B) ) E. Accessory Uses.
1. Accessory uses .and buildings customarily
appurtenant to a permitted use, such as incidental storage
facilities, which must be enclosed, and loading and unloading
areas.
2 . For permitted uses, hazardous substance land
uses, including on-site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage
facilities, which are not subject to cleanup permit requirements
of Kent City Code Chapter 4 . 19 and which do not accumulate more
than 5, 000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any
combination thereof at any one time on site, subject to the
provisions of section 15. 08.050, except off-site hazardous waste
treatment and/or storage facilities which are not permitted in
this district.
( (E) ) F. Conditional Uses.
1. Multifamily residential uses.
2 . Commercial parking lots or structures.
3 . Railway and bus depots, taxi stands.
4. General Conditional Uses as listed in Section
15. 08 . 030.
5. Equipment rental and leasing services (DC-2 zone
only) .
6. Automotive repair services, not to include body
and fender repair (DC-2 zone only) . ;
7 . Group Homes Class II-A II-B II-C and III.
( (F) ) G. Development Standards.
1. Minimum lot. Minimum lot of record.
2 . Maximum site' coveracre. one hundred (100)
percent.
- 15 -
i
a.
I
3 . Setbacks. None, except as required by.
landscaping, or if off-street parking is provided on site, and
except when a rear and/or side yard abuts a residential district,
and then a twenty (20) foot rear and/or side yard shall- be
required.. ... . . . .
4 . Height limitation. Four (4) stories or. sixty
(60) feet. However, the Planning Director shall be authorized to
grant one additional story in height, if during Development Plan
Review, it is found that this additional story would not detract
from the continuity of the area. More than one additional story
may be granted by the Planning Commission.
5. The landscaping requirements of Chapter 15. 07
shall apply.
( (G) )H. Signs. The sign requirements of Chapter 15. 06
shall apply.
( (H) ) I. Off-Street Parking. The off-street parking
requirements of Chapter 15. 05 shall apply.
( (I) )J. Development Plan Review. Development plan
approval is required, as provided in Section 15. 09. 010.
Section 14 . Section 15. 04 . 120 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 120. COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING-1 OR CM-1.
D. Conditional Uses
1. Offices.
2 . Light manufacturing operations in any building
regardless of its size built prior to June 4, 1973 . Provided,
however, that in the event it should become necessary to rebuild
or replace any such building, then, in that event, the light
manufacturing operations permitted under this section shall not
16 -
encompass i area of greater than the size of the buildings on
June 4, .19'
3 . For permitted uses, accessory hazardous
substance d uses which are not subject to cleanup permit
requiremer of Kent City. Code Chapter 4 . 19 and which accumulate
more than 000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any
coi-, inati hereof at any one time on site or which handle more
than ` . 0 ounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any
, combin 5 hereof on site in any 30 day period of time, subject
le ions of Section 15.08 . 050, except off-site hazardous
tr, it and/or storage facilities which are not permitted
ict.
4 . Group Homes Class I-A I-B I-C, II-A II-B,
-C
( (4) ) 5. General Conditional Uses as listed in
.030.
* *
_on *15. Section 15. 04 . 130 of the zoning Code
�- nc ;7 , 2404) is amended to read as follows:
. 130. COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING-2 OR CM-2 .
* *
1. Conditional Uses.
i
1. Offices.
2 . Light manufacturing operations in any building
regardless size built prior to June 4 , 1973 . Providecl, how-
ever, that the event it should become necessary to rebuild or
replace any ch building, then, in that event, the light manufac-
turing operz; ons .permitted under this section shall not encompass
an area greater than the size of said building on June 4, 1973 .
3 . Group Homes Class I-A I-B I-C, II-A, II-B.
II-C and III.
17 -
i�
( (3) ) 4 . General Conditional Uses as listed in
Section 15.08.030.
( (4) ) 5. For permitted uses, accessory hazardous
substance land uses, which are not subject to cleanup permit
requirements of Kent City Code Chapter 4. 19 and which accumulate
more than 10,000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any
combination thereof at any one time on site or which handle more
than 20, 000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any
combination thereof on site in any 30 day period of time, subject
to the provisions of Section 15. 08 . 050E except off-site hazardous
waste treatment and/or storage facilities which are not permitted
in this district.
Section 16. Section 15. 04 . 140 of the Zoning Code
�I (Ordinance 1827, 2404) is .amended to read as follows:
'15. 04 . 140. GENERAL COMMERCIAL OR GC.
A. Principally Permitted Uses.
1. Trade
a. Wholesale
Bakery
b. Retail - general merchandise
'Department stores
Dry goods and general merchandise
Electrical supplies ,
Farm equipment
Hardware
Heating and plumbing equipment
Lumberyatds
Mail order houses
Merchandise vending machine operators
18 -
yIi
li
Paint, glass and wallpaper
Variety stores
c. Retail - food
Bakeries (with accessory manufacturing)
Candy, nut, and confectionery (with
accessory manufacturing)
'Dairy products
Fruits and vegetables
Groceries
Meat, fish, and poultry
d. Retail - automotive marine craft, aircraft
and accessories
Aircraft and accessories
Marine craft and accessories
Motor vehicles (new and/or used cars and
recreation vehicles)
Tires, batteries, and accessories
e. Retail - apparel and accessories
New and/or used apparel and accessories
f. Retail - furniture home furnishings and
equipment
'New and/or used and finished and/or
unfinished furniture, home furnishings and
equipment
g. Retail - eating and drinking establishments
Drinking establishments (taverns and
cocktail lounges) ,
Eating establishments (restaurants) without
drive-in or drive-through facilities.
h. Retail - other
Antiques
Bicycles
Books
19 -
1�
Bottled gas
Cameras and photographic supplies
Cigars and cigarettes
Computers and software
Drug and proprietary items
Florists
Fuel and ice dealers
Fuel oil
Gifts, novelties, and souvenirs
Hay, grains, and feeds
Jewelry
Liquor
Newspapers and magazines
Optical goods
Pets and pet supplies
Secondhand merchandise
Sporting goods
Stationery
Video cassette sales and rentals
2 . Services
a. Finance insurance and real estate services
Banking and related services
Commodity brokers, dealers and related
services
Housing and investment services
Insurance brokers, agents and related
services. _
Insurance carriers
Real estate agents, brokers and related
services
Real estate operators, lessors and
management services
20 -
i
Real estate subdividing and developing
services
Security brokers, dealers and related
services
Title abstracting and insurance services
b. Personal services
Beauty and barber services
Diaper services
Funeral and crematory services
Laundering and dry cleaning (self-service)
Laundering, dry cleaning, and dyeing services
Linen supply and industrial laundry services
Photographic services
Pressing, alteration, and garment repair
Rug cleaning and repair services
Shoe repair, shoe shining, and hat cleaning
services
c. Business services
Advertising services
Automobile and truck rental
Blueprinting and photocopying services
Business and management consulting services
Consumer and mercantile credit reporting
services; adjustment and collection services
Detective and protective services
Disinfecting and exterminating services
Employment services ,
Equipment rental and leasing services
Food lockers (without food preparation
facilities)
Motion picture distribution and services
News syndicate services
Other dwelling and business services
21 -
I
I
1�
Outdoor advertising services
I
Photofinishing services
Research, development, and testing services
Stenographic services and other duplicating
-and mailing services
Trading stamp services
Window cleaning services
d. Repair services
Armature rewinding services
Automobile repair services
Automobile wash services
Electrical repair services
Fleet vehicle maintenance
Radio and television repair services
Reupholstery and furniture repair services
Small engine repair Truck repair
Watch, clock and jewelry repair services
e. Professional services
Accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping
services
Educational and scientific research services
Engineering and architectural services
Hospital services
Legal services
Medical and dental laboratory services
Medical and. dental services
Medical clinic - out-patient services
Sanitarium, convalescent, and rest home
services
Urban planning services
Jf. Contract construction services
Building construction - general contractor
services
22 -
1I
Carpentering and wood flooring
Concrete services
Electrical services
Masonry, stonework, tile setting, and
plastering services
Painting, paperhanging and decorating
i
services
Plumbing, heating, and air conditioning
` services
Roofing and sheet metal services
Water well drilling services
g. Educational services
Art and music schools
Barber and beauty schools
Business and stenographic schools
Correspondence schools
Dancing schools
Driving schools = auto
Driving schools - truck
Vocational or trade schools
h. Miscellaneous services
Animal grooming parlors
Business -associations and organizations
Civic, social, and fraternal associations
Labor unions and similar labor organizations
Veterinary clinics and animal hospital
services when located no closer than one
hundred fifty (150) feet to any residential
use, providing the animals are housed
indoors (no outside runs) and the building
is soundproofed. Soundproofing must be
designed by competent acoustical engineers.
Welfare and charitable services
23 -
it
I4 ill .
1.
3 . Residential
a. Lodgings
Hotels
Motels
b. Existing dwellings may be rebuilt, repaired
and otherwise changed for human occupancy.
Accessory uses for existing dwellings may be
constructed. Such uses are garages,
carports, storage sheds and fences.
C. Transitional housing facilities, limited to
a maximum of 20 residents at anyone time
and 4 resident staff.
4 . Cultural entertainment and recreational
a. Cultural activities and nature exhibitions
Art galleries
Historic and monument sites
b. Public assembly
Amphitheaters
Arenas and field houses
Auditoriums
Drive-in movies
Exhibition halls
Legitimate theaters (live)
Motion picture theaters
Stadiums
C. Amusements and recreation
Amusement parks
Athletic clubs
Bowling
Fairgrounds
Go-cart tracks
Golf driving ranges
Minature golf
24
,i
Skating (roller or ice)
Tennis
Video arcades
5. Other uses
a. Other retail trade, service, or entertain-
ment/recreational uses that are of the same
general character as those listed; which are
deemed compatible with other permitted uses
in this district and which operate in
accordance with the stated purpose of this
district.
b. Municipal uses and buildings, except for
such uses and buildings subject to Section
4
15. 04 .200.
D. Conditional Uses.
1. Printing and publishing establishments, and
accessory uses and buildings, customarily appurtenant to such use.
2 . Mini-warehouses and self-service storage
3 . General Conditional Uses as listed in Section
15. 08 . 030.
4 . Kennels.
5. For permitted uses, accessory hazardous
substance land uses which are not subject to cleanup requirements
of Kent City Code Chapter 4 . 19 and which accumulate more than
10,000 pounds of hazardous substances or wastes or any .combination
thereof at any one time on site or which handle more than 20, 000
pounds of hazardous substance and wastes on site in any 30 day
period of time, subject to the provisions of Section 15.08 . 050,
except off-site hazardous waste treatment and/or storage
facilities which are not permitted in this district.
6. Group Homes Class I-A I-B I-C, II-A, II-B,
II-C and III .
25 -
i
l
Section 17 . Section 15. 04. 150 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 04 . 150. PROFESSIONAL AND OFFICE DISTRICT OR 0.
A. Principally Permittad Uses.
1. Medical and dental offices; medical and dental
laboratory services.
2 . Administrative and professional offices such as
lawyers, , engineers, real estate, accountants, financial offices
such as banks, savings and loan institutions, insurance offices,
auditing, bookkeeping, architectural and urban planning services,
business and management consulting services, advertising services.
3 . Veterinary clinics when located no closer than
one hundred fifty (150) feet to any residential use, providing t�-
animals -are housed indoors- (no -outside- runs) and the building is
soundproofed. Soundproofing must be designed by competent
acoustical engineers.
4 . Schools and studios for art, crafts,
photography, music, dance. Educational and scientific research,
research and development services.
5. Blueprinting and photocopying services.
6. Consumer and mercantile credit reporting
services, adjustment and collecting services.
7. Detective and protective services.
8 . Stenographic services and other duplicating and
mailing services.
9 . News syndicate services.
10. Employment services.
11. Group Homes Class I-A I-B, and I-C.
( (--1) ) 12 . Any other use that is determined by the
Planning Director to be of the same general character as the abov
permitted uses.
26 -
it
Municipal uses and buildings, except for
such uses and buildings subject to Section 15. 04.200.
Existing dwellings may be rebuilt, repaired and
otherwise changed for human occupancy. Accessory uses for
existing dwellings may be constructed. Such uses are garages,
carports, storage sheds and fences.
C. Conditional Uses.
1. Multifamily development over office uses and
multi-family developments (apartments and townhouses) .
2 . Mortuaries.
3 . Beauty and barber services.
4 . Tanning salons.
5. Nail manicuring services.
6 General Conditional , Uses as listed in Section
15. 08. 030.
7 . Retail sales as follows:
As part of a planned development where at least
fifty (50) percent of the total development is for office use.
Drive-in restaurants, service stations, drive-in
cleaning establishments and other similar retail establishments
are not permitted.
8 . Group Homes Class II-A II-B II-C and III.
Section 18. The Zoning Code (Ordinance 1827, 2404) is
amended to add the following new section:
27 -
I'
i
I
II
i
15. 08. 280. GROUP HOMES -- CLASS II AND III.
A. Purpose.
It is the purpose of this section to outline general
conditions with which Class III and III Group Homes (as defined in
Section 15 02 173 of this Code) must comply when applvina_ for a
conditional use permit to locate in the City of Kent._
B—. Dispersion Requirements.
r
A Class II and III Group Home must locate a minimum
of 600 feet from any other Class II or III Group Home. This
distance will be measured by following a straight line without
regard to intervening buildings from the nearest point of the
property or parcel upon which the proposed use is to be located,
to the nearest point of the parcel or property or the land use
district boundary line from which the proposed use is to be
separated.
C. Separation Requirements.
A 1 , 000 foot separation requirement will apply to
Class II and III Group Homes to separate such facilities from
sensitive land uses such as public or private schools, churches or
other religious facilities or institutions parks and plavgrounds,
and other such uses that are deemed to be sensitive. In addition
to the above sensitive uses Class III Group Homes must be
separated at least 1 , 000 feet from all residential areas. This
distance would be measured by the same method as that for the
dispersion requirements described in B above.
D. Registration and Licensing.
Group Homes must obtain all licenses necessary for
operation by state and/or federal agencies. Class II and III
Group Homes must also register with the City of Kent by supplying
information pertinent to the validity, update and renewal status
of the Home's state and/or federal license Accuracy of all
information contained in any state and/or federal license shallI
28 -
1!
i
,I
verified to the extent possible by the City of Kent, and any
applicant for a Group Home Conditional Use Permit shall have the
responsibility to ensure that any chancres made to the license
prior to its renewal are immediately provided to the City.
Section 19. Section 15. 08. 030 of the Zoning Code
(Ordinance 1827, 2404) is amended to read as follows:
15. 08. 030. GENERAL CONDITIONAL USE.
B. Type of Uses Identified. The uses identified for
the purpose of this section will generally fall into several broad
categories:
1. Utility, transportation and communication
facilities. Includes electrical substations, pumping or
regulating devices for the transmission of water, gas, steam,
petroleum, etc. , bus stops, transit stations, etc.
2 . Public facilities. Includes fire houses, police
stations, libraries, and administrative offices of governmental
agencies; primary and secondary schools, vocational schools and
colleges.
3 . Open space uses. Includes cemeteries, parks,
playgrounds, golf courses and other recreation facilities,
including buildings or structures associated therewith.
4 . Drive-in churches retirement homes
convalescent homes and other welfare facilities (excluding Group
Homes Class I II and III as defined in Section 15. 02. 173 of this
code) whether privately or publicly operated; facilities for
rehabilitation or correction, private clubs, fraternal lodges, etc
29 -
Section 20. Severability. The provisions of this
ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The
invalidity of any clause , sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect
the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 21. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final
passage as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROGER A. LUBOVICH, CITY -ATTORNEY
PASSED the day of , 1990.
APPROVED the day of 1 . 1990.
PUBLISHED .the . . day of 1. 1990.
30 -
i
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of ordinance
No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereo
indicated.
(SEAL)
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
9150-320
-' 31 -
December 17, 1990
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Kent City
Council will hold a public hearing on January
2 , 1991 at 7 :00 pm in the Council Chambers at
Kent City Hall to reconsider the action taken
by the City Council on October 2 , 1990
regarding group homes and to clarify the
definitions of Groups I, II and III.
Marie Jensen, CMC
City Clerk
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
seconds that Consent , alendar Items A through P be approved.
Discussion
Action —�
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
December 4, 1990.
�\
A
U3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills after auditing by the
;1 Operations Committee at its meeting at 4: 30 p.m. on January 8,
1991.
4�
�. Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numb I
1 r i 1 �I(_ 'kV-1
J
�L' /4j'i.) `,���c.
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
Kent, Washington
December 4, 1990 ,
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7: 00
p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers Dowell, Johnson,
Mann, Orr and Woods, Assistant City Administrator Hansen, City
Attorney Lubovich, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director
Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief Frederiksen, Informa-
tion Service Director Spang, Personnel Director Olson, Parks
Director Wilson, Finance Director McCarthy and City Clerk Marie
Jensen. City Administrator Chow and Councilmembers Houser and
White were attending the National League of Cities Conference.
Approximately 60 people were at the meeting.
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Employee of the Month. Mayor Kelleher announced
that Jennifer Carey has been selected as Employee
of the Month for December. She works as an
Office Technician II in the Parks Department.
The Mayor noted that Ms. Carey is applauded by
her fellow co-workers for her enthusiastic
attitude and her willingness to assist with the
many diverse parks and recreation programs.
Parks Director Wilson expressed appreciation
from the Parks Department as well as the public.
Crime Prevention Award. Leah Heilpern, Public
Education Specialist, noted that National Night
Out has been held for the past seven years, and
that Kent took fourth place in the nation this
year for cities of 40, 000 and under. She expressed
thanks to all who helped win this award, includ-
ing employees of the Senior Center, Block Watch
Captains, Cedar River Rovers, and ladies who
made and donated a quilt. She also commended
the Crime Prevention team. Police Chief Frederikser
also complimented the crime prevention team and
the public. The award was presented to the Mayor
with a request that it be prominently displayed
for the public to enjoy. Mayor Kelleher noted
that the citizens of Kent appreciate Chief
Frederiksen' s fine work through various programs.
CONSENT CALENDAR WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through
H be approved, with the exception of Item G
which was removed by Councilmember Dowell. Orr
seconded and the motion carried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes
of the regular Council meeting of November 20,
1990.
- 1 -
December 4, 1990
WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3C)
Joint Reservoir Equity Purchase. AUTHORIZATION
for the Public Works Director to transmit the
Council concurrence of the letter of understand-
ing for purchase of Water District III Equity
in the joint use reservoir, as recommended by
the Public Works Committee.
TRAFFIC CONTROL (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3D)
Valley Transportation Benefit District. AUTHOR-
IZATION for the Mayor to sign a revised inter-
local agreement to establish the Valley Trans-
portation Benefit District deleting Auburn and
adding SeaTac as participating jurisdictions,
as recommended by the Public Works Committee.
STREET VACATION (PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 2A)
Pacific Ventures Street Vacation STV-90-5. A
public hearing has been set for this date on
the application of Pacific Ventures, Inc. , to
vacate a portion of S. 212th Street as mentioned
in Resolution 1264. This is located at the 8700
block of S. 212th Street.
Mayor Kelleher noted receipt of a letter from
Pacific Ventures , requesting that this item be
delayed to the January 15, 1991 meeting. JOHNSON
SO MOVED. Woods seconded and the motion carried.
WALKWAY VACATION (OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 4B)
Parkside Request for Vacation of Walkway. The
public hearing on the vacation request for the
walkway was held on October 2, and the matter
referred to the Public Works Committee for a
solution. The Public Works Committee has recom-
mended denying a vacation request and for the
City to clean up the walkway area, move fences
that are in City right-of-way back to the pro-
perty lines, install lighting and continue
maintenance for the property. Costs for the
improvements. are estimated to be $5, 500 which
can be funded from the Public Works Department
Operating Budget.
Wickstrom noted that the walkway is located on
West Hill between Military Road and 38th Avenue S. ,
at S. 250th. DOWELL MOVED for the acceptance of
the recommendation of the Public Works Committee
to clean up and light the area rather than to
vacate it. Orr seconded and the motion carried.
2 -
December 4, 1990
ZONING CODE (CONSENT CALENDAR . ITEM 3G)
(REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER DOWELL)
Group Homes. Authorization to set the first
meeting in January 1991 for a public hearing to
consider .action taken on October 2, 19,90, by the
Council and clarify the groupings of what would
specifically be Group I, Group II and Group III.
Upon Dowell ' s question, City Attorney Lubovich
noted that the Council has already approved the
three categories of group homes, but that Group
III had been sent to the Planning Committee for
review. He said that the Legal Department has
done some research on this matter and is working
on modifications to Groups II and III. He stated
that all three groups would be discussed at the
hearing. WOODS MOVED to schedule this item for
the first Council meeting :in January. Johnson
seconded and the motion carried.
NOISE CONTROL (CONSENT CALENDAR .ITEM 3E)
Noise Control Ordinance. ADOPTION of Ordinance
2954 amending Ordinance 2113 and repealing Ordi-
nance 2673, relating to controlling noise and
providing for penalties for violations , as recom-
mended by the Public Safety Committee.
PRELIMINARY PLAT (OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 4A)
Cedar Meadows No. SU-90-4. This meeting will
consider the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation
of conditional approval of an application by
J & G Industry for a 15-lot single family resi-
dential preliminary subdivision. The property
is located on the west side of 116th Avenue S.E. ,
.approximately 100 feet north of S. 229th Street.
There were no comments from the Council or the
audience and JOHNSON MOVED to accept the findings
of the Hearing Examiner, to adopt the Hearing
Examiner ' s recommendation of approval with twelve
( 12 ) conditions of the Cedar Meadows No. SU-90-4
15-lot single family residential preliminary sub-
division. Woods seconded and. the motion carried.
Steve Chatman of 11410 S.E. 229th, stated that
he didn't understand the conditions and Kevin
O'Neill of the Planning Department was called
upon to explain. A motion was then passed to
reconsider Johnson' s motion to approve the
Examiner ' s recommendation. O'Neill and Chatman
adjourned to the lobby and when they returned ten
minutes later, Johnson' s motion to approve the
Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation with twelve
conditions carried unanimously.
3 -
December 4, 1990
HUMAN SERVICES (OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 4C)
Severe Weather Shelter for Homeless. This mee...
ing will consider the approval of a resolution
to provide emergency shelter for the homeless
during severe weather conditions with the alloc-
ation of $15, 418 of emergency funding from Human
Services.
Lin Ball of the Planning Department noted that
Human Services providers of the area have
requested that the City consider making some pro-
visions for temporary shelter for the homeless
during the severe winter weather. She pointed
out that the Human Services Commission has
$15, 418 in unallocated funds and that the Plan-
ning Committee recommends that the City pass a
resolution addressing the need for emergency
severe weather shelter. Marvin Eckfeldt, Chair-
man for the Commission, introduced representatives
of several of the service providers. Ms. Becvar
of the Kent .Community Services noted that there
is no provision for housing through this organi-
zation. Jean Salls of the YMCA noted that pro-
vision is made for family housing and that many,
even those with children, had to be turned away
due to lack of space. Sharon Atkin of the Sou+'-
King County Multi Service Center stated that 1
to 130 families per month seek aid, as compared
with 90 to 100 families two years ago.
Sandy Spurlock of the Catholic Community Services
noted shelters in Seattle. She noted that any
donations for the needy would be accepted at the
local office at 1229 W. Smith. Reverend Eckfeldt
explained that the shelter would be supervised,
would house single men only and would allow no
drugs, alcohol or firearms. Be clarified that
the Commission might contract with an agency
such as the Salvation Army to supervise the shel-
ter. Families would be given vouchers to cover
local motels. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt Resolution
1266 addressing the need for emergency shelter
during severe weather and to allocate $15, 418 to
this program: Dowell seconded and the motion
carried. All agreed to a change in the wording
of Section 3.
The Fire Chief and Director of Public Works gave
a brief report on the recent flooding and esti-
mated the damage in Kent to be approximately
4 -
December 4, 1990
HUMAN SERVICES $60, 000. It was noted that the City staff had
been collecting food and warm clothing for any
in need of same.
LIBRARY (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3H)
Library Services. The City recently participated
with four other communities in a study of library
services provided by the King County Library
System. The need for the study was prompted by
substantial increases in the annual contract
amount. The Operations Committee supports the
position of the Library Board and recommends
continuation of the present contract.
PERSONNEL (OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 4E)
Management Study Consultant Selection. The
City Management Study Committee, comprised of
the Operations Committee, three department heads
and three members of the Chamber of Commerce,
received eleven proposals, interviewed three
firms and selected the Warner Group to complete
the management study. The committee requests
authorization for the Mayor to enter into a con-
tract with the Warner Group. WOODS SO MOVED.
Orr seconded and the motion carried.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the
bills received through December 4, 1990, after
auditing by the Operations Committee at its
meeting at 4: 30 p.m. on December •11 , 1990.
Approval of Checks issued for vouchers :
Date Check Numbers Amount
11/16-11/29/90 98774-98799 $277, 943. 51
11/30/90 98000-99319 974,072 . 28
$1, 252, 015 . 79
Approval of checks issued for payroll :
Date Check Numbers Amount -
11/20/90 144600-145349 $833,010. 26
(CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3F)
1991 Property Tax Levy Ordinance. ADOPTION
of Ordinance 2955 setting the property tax levy
for 1991 , as has been scheduled for tonight ' s
5 -
December 4, 1990
FINANCE meeting. The revised deadline for submitting ..
the 1991 property tax levy to the King County
Council is December 11 , 1990.
The ordinance reflects the increase in the City
of Kent' s assessed valuation from approximately
$2. 8 billion to $3. 4 billion. This increase,
because of the State' s 106% levy lid, generates
a reduction in the City of Kent' s total levy
from approximately $3. 14 per thousand dollars of
assessed valuations to $2. 95 per thousand dollars
of assessed valuation. The $2. 95 levy rate
includes 201� for retirement of the .Senior Housing
Bond Issue sold in November as approved by the
City of. Kent voters in February 1990.
BUDGET (OTHER BUSINESS ITEM 4D)
1990 Budget Adjustment Ordinance. The Finance
Department is requesting an ordinance to amend
the 1990 budget. All budget changes approved .
during 1990 and other budget adjustments where
revenues have been generated by grants or
charges for services are contained herein. The
ordinance also increases the interfund loan
from the General Fund to the Golf Complex to
cover the projected cash deficit. The amount
the ordinance is $16, 525. 725.
Finance Director McCarthy gave a rundown of the
amounts by department or project, a copy of which
has been filed for the record.
WOODS MOVED to adopt Ordinance 2955. Johnson
seconded and the motion carried.
REPORTS (REPORTS ITEM 7A)
Council President. Woods noted that the City
Holiday Party will be held on December 15th at
the Senior Center, and that Suburban Cities will
meet on December 12th in Bellevue. She asked
Councilmembers to contact Administration if they
plan to attend. She also announced that the
Council retreat will be held on February 27, 28
and March 1 , and asked anyone who cannot attend
on those dates to contact her.
(REPORTS ITEM 7E)
Public Safety Committee. Mann noted that the
Public Safety Committee met this date -and a
petition containing 421 signatures was submitted.
6 -
December 4, 1990
REPORTS The petition is in regard to installation of
a signal light at Central Avenue and S. 259th.
He noted that they have recently received another
petition regarding a pedestrian overpass for
school children on lower James Street, and
asked that these items be considered soon.
(REPORTS ITEM 7G)
Administrative Reports. Assistant City Admini-
strator Hansen announced that there will not be
a Council meeting on December 18, 1990. The
next meeting will be on Wednesday; January 2,
1 991 .
City Attorney Lubovich noted that he had been
asked at the last Council meeting to research
whether the City is required to extend utility
services beyond its boundaries. He stated that
he has found that the City is not required to do
so, and that he will contact Councilmember White
with this information. His written report was
contained in the Reports section of the agenda.
EXECUTIVE SESSION At 8: 05 p.m. , Assistant City Administrator Hansen
announced that there would be a brief executive
session of approximately fifteen minutes to
discuss a real estate item.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting reconvened at 8: 25 p.m. and then
adjourned.
Iz!
Marie Jensen, CMC
City Clerk
- 7 -
Kent City Council Meeting
N L� Date January 2 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
LIBRARY BOARD I('Poi NIµ Nt ,
Confirmation of the Mayor's appointment
of Raul Ramos to ibrary Board replacing Sally Hopkins whose
term has expired. This appointment will begin immediately and
continue through March, 1995.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Mayor
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Mayor Kelleher
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAWPERSONWEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL OTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS*
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
3C
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT
COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR\""^
DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1990
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF RAUL RAMOS TO LIBRARY BOARD OF DIRECTORS
I have recently appointed Raul Ramos as a member of the Library
Board of Directors. He will replace Sally Hopkins whose term has
expired.
Mr. Ramos is currently active as a planning and development
consultant. He was employed by the City of Kent as an Associate
Planner from 1974 to 1979 and is active in community affairs.
His term will begin immediately and continue through 3/95 .
I submit this for your confirmation.
DK:jb
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 . 1991
4 ' OL/ Category Consent Calendar
PLAZA BY THE GREEN •
Acceptance of the bill of sale and
warranty agreement submitted by Young Development and
Construction Company, Inc. for continuous operation and
maintenance of approximately 826 feet of sanitary sewer
extension constructed in the vicinity of Russell Road and Meeker
Street for the Plaza by the Green Development and release of
cash bond after expiration of the one-year maintenance period.
3. EXHI TS: vicinity map
4.• RECOMMENDED`�Y: Staff
(Committee; Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL ERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL PERSONNEL N E: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
PLAZA BY THE GREEN
�' }� A�tOW •. S7 nil• I -NII{Y f 4�TH_AV_
s 1 7 \ o
.tL `• S�_AY_�
Ni
lop1
I i i 1 l P �99
, � C
I/P'i�� � `P•P
I q�Cal �-
bp�t', 7
4 CA
N
n CA �, l =
m
= 66TH AV Z S
Cl)
I K I l I QBTH AV 5 —
I (A PK
VALLEY HWY
• �••�
1 WA HINGTON
t l AV � � AEI �rY1 I = I
ON AV i I t m
�" CNICAGO I MILWAUKff S INT P UL AN
M T.
AV
_ pT}I
sm s rn s 3 f N AV
' ! l --------- ----...i..i
�i,
n A i r I� C7 s+§ 15 x v o� I fV S
• c
.f 2 _ ar`: •p
3AoE� AV rtiF-1 AV s
�\`_
_ZN y 14 ,,..-.Jv_5. C N N AV nTR AY f ---- -- —--------'- �� AV .- . . .T D bn 1k, Q
3 y a N y z. Ise:.. AV wi 1 tOtll o f NV3r1LY N u, 1 Iv {�
AV
E ~ A V N CEN RAL AV o
Z m
$ TATE 't I~ 1
<1 84TH AV
A4 r AVh A D ^"x '1 U�ISIVALLEY RD)
�wcnii� v
a I u �.::I C] j
I T 6EBTH At S S �
PROP A o l
..A 2
I
AV `tlBfH FL
N R' a r�PRINfi ISF quANITI nv Nze,
o
y Ol ! I r S AV H
1 tH AV S
$ �� (HAMILTON RD l...l� 94 � 5
�•�i"y ..,.A ,n rv� r .l
N N
.�! "a V f YIE�,Ci
190iH AV S p ,.. 0 96TH A 5WTV1IS �H .
a , vf9 T� H�.1y
S A 1 JS
?r.`• N.•: - l of w N I 'JI I ft ft2 9BTH-uf1 v� yy♦� ', ya,
y
�,� l AV = y �j -• .'•RR vl. N N I I . . . PL $SBTH ?Yy 4.N V6n,
STFAYfBEY o AV S w AV SE �,t•
zi
91TH y AV S TH,AV s �1 ,,, �y 99TH AV z
01^ I ••\ I nllirl N
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 , 1991
Category. Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: LID 337 - WEST VIEW TERRACE/McCANN'S WEST VIEW ,
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution c7� setting
February 5, 1991 as date for public hearing on formation of
LID 337.
3 . EXHIBITS: 'Vicinity map and resolution
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ `
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
1
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of
Kent, Washington, declaring its intention to order
the improvement Of sanitary sewers in Westview
Terrace and McCann' s Westview along 96th and 98th
Avenues South and along South 216th and 214th streets
and to create a local improvement district to assess
the cost and expense of carrying out those
improvements against the properties specially
benefited thereby, and notifying all persons who
desire to object to the improvements to appear and
present their objections at a hearing before the City
Council to be held on February 5 , 1991 .
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT,
WASHINGTON, as follows :
Section I . it is the intention of the City Council of the
City - of Kent, Washington, to order the improvement of the
properties within the area described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto and by this reference made a part hereof , by the
improvement of sanitary sewers along 96th and 98th Avenues south
and along South 216th and 214th Streets as described in- Exhibit
B, attached hereto and by this reference made .a part hereof .
All of the foregoing improvements shall be in accordance
with the plans and specifications therefor prepared by the
Director of Public Works of the City and may be modified by the
City as long as that modification does not affect the purpose of
the improvements .
1G/ �1 1JJU ll •yam. II\UII IU.JI LI 11
Section 2 . The total estimated cost and expense of the
improvements is declared to be $322, 853 and the entire cost and
expense of the improvements shall be borne by and assessed
against the property specially benefited by the improvements to
be included in. a local improvement district to be established
embracing as nearly as practicable all the property specially
benefited by the improvements . Actual assessments may vary from
estimated assessments as long as they do not exceed a figure
equal to 'the increased true and fair value the improvements add
to the property.
Section 3 . The City Clerk is authorized and directed to
give notice of the adoption of this resolution and of the date,
time and place fixed for the public hearing to each owner or
reputed owner of any lot, tract , parcel of land or other
property within the proposed local improvement district by
mailing such notice at least fifteen days before the date fixed
for public hearing to the owner or reputed owner of the property
as shown on the tax rolls of the King County Assessor at the
address shown thereon, as required by law. The City clerk also
is authorized and directed to give notice of the adoption of
this resolution and of the date, time and place fixed for the
public hearing to each owner or reputed owner of any lot, tract,
parcel of land or other property outside of the proposed local
improvement district thatis required by the Federal Housing
Administration as a condition of loan qualification to be
-2-
a
lca cY/1'1_iU 1Y•14J I-KUI'I FUa I tK I U clfVJJ7Ja lJUU.INo�JJJ.�1 r .�o
connected to the proposed improvements , by mailing such notice
at least fifteen days before the date fixed for the public
hearing to the owner or reputed owner of the property as shown
on the tax rolls of the King County Assessor at the address
shown' thereon, as required by law.
This resolution also shall be published in at least two
consecutive issues of the official newspaper of the City, the
date of the first publication to be at least fifteen days prior
to the date fixed for the public hearing.
Section 4 . All persons who may desire to object to the
improvements are notified to appear and present those objections
at a hearing before the City Council to be held in the Council
Chambers in the City Hall in Kent, Washington, at 7 : 00 p.m. on
February 5, 1991 , which time and place are fixed for hearing all
matters relating to the improvements and all objections thereto
and .for determining the method of payment for the improvements .
All persons who may desire to object thereto should appear and
present their objections at that hearing. .' Any person who may
desire to file a written protest with the City Council may do so
within 30 days after the date of passage of the ordinance
ordering the improvements in the event the local improvement
district is formed. The written protest should be signed by the
property owner and should include the legal description of the
property for which the protest is filed and that protest should
be delivered to the City Clerk.
_3_
l.: c(i 1�_J 1i • i., f..P.�i , ri` _ a _ . ._, _ _.,_ _ ... .. ..
c
Section S . The City' s Director of Public Works is directed
to submit to the City Council on or prior to February 5, 1991 ,
all data and information required by law to be submitted.
Passed at a regular open public meeting by the City Council
of the City of Kent, Washington, this 2nd day of January, 1991 .
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent this day
of January, 1991 .
DAIS KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
r
�,:..��� � t"� r`�mac.�•� Z �_
FOST R PEPPER & SHEFLMAN
Spe.G, �al Counsel and B=a Counsel
KJB-470
-4-
lci di'/1.7AJ i f;414 FKUI'I rLU I tK rtrl-'tKcvorlcrtLl'IHIi a r=HUJ777•,ut,J. Hu.�7J..)J-+ , .¢Ju
r
r
EXHIBIT 'A'
LID BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LID 337
WESTVIEW TERRACE/McCANN'S WESTVIEW
96TH AVE. S. ; 98TH AVE . S-
S, 216TH ST. . S. 214TH STREET
1. Lots 1 through 8 inclusive, McCann's Westview, according to the
plat recorded in Volume 73 of Plats, Pages 30 and 31, records .
of King County, WA.
2. Lots 23 through 46, Lots 57 through 59 and Lots 61 through 70
inclusive, Westview Terrace No. 3, according to the plat
recorded in Volume 74 of Plats, Pages 19 and 201 Records of
King County.
3 . Lots E, F and G inclusive, Westview Terrace No. 68 according records of
the plat recorded in Volume 80 of Plats, Page
King County, WA.
1L r 1• 1 " a 1 11 1 1 �I 1 1 Lam. L i � I L v� iL �- • � .. .. .
•Y t -
r
EXHIBIT 'B'
L.I:D. 337
WESTVIEW TERRACE/MCCANN'S WESTVIEW
SANITARY SEWER
96TH AVE- S. ; 98TH Al. S-
S. 216TH ST. ; S. 214TH STREET
LZGA.L DES ON
See Exhibit "A" attached and made a part hereto.
SANIT S I RO
Description: Includes the installation of 8" sanitary sewers, 6"
side sewers and related appurtenances.
ON FROM
98th Avenue S. S. 216th St. 200 ' South of S. 213th P1
S. 216th St. 96th Ave. S. 98th Ave. S.
96th Ave. S. S. 216th St. 200 ' S-t<. of S. 213th St.
S. 214th St. 96th Ave. S. East to end of cul-de-sac
Easement 96th Ave. S. 150 ' West of 96th Ave. S.
near S. 216th St.
Easement West ,end of 130 feet south
easement above
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: METRO INFILTRATION/INFLOW REDUCTION PILOT PROGRAM
2 .
��w , As recommended by the Public Works Let"_ITe
R
uthorization for the City to participate in the
Metro Infi ration/Inflow Reduction Pilot Program and for the
Mayor to sign the infiltration/inflow project agreement)
3 . EXHIBITS: Memora um from Public Works Director and excerpt
from Public Works mmittee minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IVACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
,3 F
Public Works Committee
December 18, 1990
Page 4
utility. That way we know where the taxes are going. Orr stated
that was the reason for her earlier question. White asked that
Wickstrom include the two options in his presentation to the
Council.
Landscaping - Scenic Hill Reservoir
Jack Cosby stated the neighbors around the Scer)ic Hill Reservoir
site would like to see it landscaped as it is an eyesore to the
community. Wickstrom stated that. a preliminary review estimates it
would require a budget of approximately $15, 000. Additional
concerns are whether we have sufficient maintenance staff to
provide continual care for said landscaping once its in. The funds
would come from the unencumbered fund balance of the water utility.
Wickstrom stressed that if the Committee wanted to proceed a budget
would have to be established along with providing the necessary
maintenance personnel. It was concluded that staff should work
with Jack Cosby in putting together a plan that would satisfy the
residents and meet the City' s needs. That could be brought back
before the Committee with a proposed budget.
Metro - Infiltration/Inflow
Wickstrom explained that Metro did a pilot study in Kent' s North
Park area on water seepage into the sewer system. They studied
whether rehab of the system including side sewers up to the houses
would be cost effective. Metro would pay 54% of the project costs.
The goal of the project is to reduce the amount of
infiltration/inflow into the Metro system which will help to
minimize the ultimate expansion of the treatment plan. Funds were
included and approved in the 1991 budget requests. Wickstrom
stated he was recommending we proceed with the project. The
Committee unanimously recommended approval .
Parking - Front of Centennial Building
Ed White stated he was recommending that the two stalls near the
west driveway into City Hall remain with a two hour limit, the-one
stall between these two-hour stalls and the crosswalk be designated
as Passenger Load Only and the two stalls between the crosswalk and
the driveway east of the Centennial Building be 30 minute parking.
The Committee unanimously concurred with the recommendations and
recommended the ordinance be amended making these changes.
Jim White brought up the matter of City utility vehicles being
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
December 12, 1990
TO: Public Works committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom 0W
RE: Metro Infiltration/Inflow Reduction Pilot Program
Metro has developed a pilot program for the purpose of reducing the
extraneous water (infiltration/inflow) that enters the sewer
systems. Following a detailed analysis, the "Kent East" basin was
selected as one area that would benefit from the project and
provide a savings to Metro.
The rehabilitation project would include replacement of public
sewers and manholes as well as lining or replacement of private
side sewers on private property. The City would construct the
improvements and Metro would reimburse the City for 54% of the
project up to $140, 000. It is estimated the total cost of the
project would be $228 , 825. Funding for this project was approved
in the 1991 CIP.
It is recommended the City participate in the program and that the
;tMayor be authorized to sign the agreement.
��METR0
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle,WA 98104-1598
CITY OF KENT
JUN 2 2 1990
June 20, 1990 ENGINEERING DEPT.
Mr. Don Wickstrom
Director of Public Works
City of Kent
220 South Fourth
Kent, WA 98031
Infiltration/Inflow Pilot Project
Dear Mr. Wi�3 sC trom: fiv� ;
Enclosed forconsideration by the City of Kent are two
original copies of a proposed agreement for an
infiltration/inflow reduction "pilot" project in the Kent
sewer system.
The project has been described in greater detail in past
communications, copies of which are enclosed.
If the agreement in its present form is acceptable to the
City, please return both copies to me after they are signed.
I will then return a fully executed copy to the City. If
you have any questions, comments, or proposed revisions,
please contact me at 684-1266
We look forward to proceeding with this effort.
Very truly your ,
F,5 6"
Robert N. Hirsch
Local Agency Affairs Administrator
RNH:jh
Enclosures
CITY OF
January 19 , 1990
1N
Bob Hirsch
METRO
821 2nd Avenue
Seattle, WA 98104
RE: METRO/Kent Infiltration/Inflow Pilot Project
North of James Street West of 1st Avenue
Dear Bob:
This is to advise you that the City is interested in pursuing the
above joint project and we will budget accordingly in our 1991
budget.
Very truly yours,
OA
'�'O'
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E.
Director of Public Works
DEW:mw
cc: Tim Heydon
Bonnie Fell
`2 04.
M
ono ..� ,...r .-.. ..ram ...,.n..•.•r,t. .• ne.nnn on Trr cnu Wort ran-•nrn -.-+nn
:;;mETR0
Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle
Exchange Building • 821 Second Ave. • Seattle, WA 98104-1598
November 3, 1989
Mr. Don Wickstrom
Director of Public Works
City of Kent
220 South Fourth
Kent, Washington 98031
Infiltration./Inflow Reduction Pilot ProgI
Dear Mr. Wickstrom:
Thanks for meeting with Phyllis Brunner and me October 11 to discuss implementation of
an infiltration/inflow reduction "pilot"project in Kent.
As previously explained, Metro is increasing its efforts to reduce extraneous water
(infiltrationfinflow) that enters sewer systems. The objective is to prolong the capacity life
of sewage treatment facilities and reduce operating costs. Because 90% of the sewer lines
tributary to Metro treatment plants are owned and operated by cities and sewer districts,
infiltration/inflow reduction efforts must focus on those local sewer systems.
The results of infiltration/inflow reduction efforts in the northwestern U. S. have been
uneven. Some have been successful and some have been failures in terms of reduction
actually realized.- We therefore believed it was necessary to undertake several small "pilot"
projects in the Metro area and evaluate the results before proceeding with a large scale
Metro wide effort. We also wanted to test the viability of cost- sharing with cities and
sewer districts to reduce infiltration/inflow.
As reiterated during our meeting,we went through several steps that led to development of
a proposed project in Kent. We first reviewed and consolidated all available infiltration
/inflow analyses previously undertaken by Metro and cities and districts in the Metro
service area. These studies provided some general information about infiltration/inflow in
the local sewer systems. Based on these previous studies, the cities of Kent,Issaquah,
Tukwila, and Eastgate Sewer District were identified as local systems with excessive
infiltration/inflow that might be cost effective to correct*. This made them the top
candidates for pilot projects for I/I reduction. With the assistance and cooperation of the
respective public works departments,we selected several small basins in each of those
cities for further study and potential rehabilitation.
The Kent basins studied are indicated on Figure 2-6 attached. Flows in these basins were
monitored and visual inspection, including smoke testing, was undertaken by Metro and
Kent field personnel. Cost of total rehabilitation in each basin was then estimated and
compared to the estimated savings to Metro resulting from the expected infiltration/inflow
reduction. This analysis demonstrated that the "Kent East"basin was the more cost-
effective of the two Kent basins to rehabilitate. The rehabilitation project would consist of
replacement of public sewers and manholes as well as lining or replacement of private side
sewers on private property. The estimated total project cost is $228,825. As explained
during our meeting, we are proposing that Kent undertake this rehabilitation project, which
More detailed analysis would undoubtedly reveal excessive infiltration/inflow in
portions of many other systems.
Letter to Mr. Wickstrom
November 3, 1989
Page Two
is described in greater detail in the "Local System Infiltration/Inflow Evaluation Phase II
Report" dated April, 1989. (Copies of this report have previously been provided.) Metro
proposes to pay 54% of the project cost. This amount equates to the estimated savings
Metro would realize due to the reduced flows. Benefits to the City of Kent that justify the
City's participation include preservation of capacity in the City's local sewer system and
rehabilitation or replacement of sewer mains and side sewers of questionable integrity.
Under our proposal, the City would do the work and Metro would reimburse the City at
the foregoing percentage. The details would be contained in an intergovernmental
agreement between the City and Metro. We understand that the City would like to
consider this project for 1991 instead of 1990 so that it can be programmed as part of the
City's normal budget cycle.
We very much appreciated the cooperation and efforts of Kent staff during development of
this proposed project. We look forward to moving ahead. If the pilot projects in Issaquah
and Kent are successful, Metro will greatly expand this program and Kent would certainly
realize future investment by Metro in its local sewer system. In addition, all sewer
ratepayers throughout the Metro service area would benefit from the savings that would
result from the large scale infiltration/inflow reduction program that will hopefully evolve
from these pilot projects.
Please contact me at 684-1266 if you have any question.
Very truly yours,
Robert N. Hirsch
Local Agency Affairs Administrator
RNH:ewa
CITY OF KENT
MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN SEATTLE
INFILTRATION/INFLOW
PROJECT AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made as of this day of
, 1990 between the City of Kent, a municipal
corporation in the State of Washington, hereinafter "the City"
and the Munipipality of Metropolitan Seattle, a metropolitan
municipal corporation in the State of Washington, hereinafter
"Metro;"
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a long term
agreement for sewage disposal dated May 18, 1967 and amended
thereafter (hereinafter referred to as the "Basic Agreement") ;
and
WHEREAS, Metro has determined that substantial amounts
of extraneous water (hereinafter "infiltration/inflow") enters
portions of the City's local sewer system which is tributary to
Metro's wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities; and
WHEREAS, Metro has estimated the cost savings it can
realize by reducing infiltration/inflow in a portion of the
City's sewer system and is .willing to spend an equal amount on a
project to reduce said infiltration/inflow; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is in the
City's best interest to undertake an infiltration/inflow
reduction project because it will preserve capacity in and extend
the useful life of local sewage facilities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows:
1
Section 1. Definitions. The defined terms used in
this agreement shall have the meanings set forth in the Basic
Agreement unless otherwise indicated herein.
Section 2. Sewer System Rehabilitation. The City will
rehabilitate and/or replace all local sewers, including private
side sewers as permitted by property owners or law, in the 9.93
acre area designated "Kent East Basin" in the Metro report
entitled "Local Sewer System Evaluation; Phase II," dated April,
1989 and delineated on Exhibit A attached hereto. The City will
make every reasonable effort to complete the work during 1991.
Plans and specifications for said rehabilitation and
replacement shall be subject to review by Metro.
In the event the City is unable to secure access rights
adequate to replace or rehabilitate side sewers on private
property as described herein, or is unable to commence
construction or rehabilitation by December 31, 1991, Metro may,
at its sole discretion, rescind this agreement upon notice to the
City and reimbursement as provided in section 3 of project costs
incurred up to the date of such notice.
Section 3. Reimbursement by Metro. Metro shall
reimburse the City for 54% of the total project cost of the work
described in Section 2, said reimbursement not to. exceed
$140,000.
Total project cost for the work described herein shall
include contract construction cost, sales tax, permit fees, legal
costs, property restoration costs, engineering design costs and
construction inspection costs. Payment shall be made to the City
not more frequently than monthly at the rate of 54% of costs
incurred for the work described in Section 2. Payments shall be
made within 45 days of receipt of a properly documented invoice.
Section 4. Inspection and Acceptance of Contractor's
Work. The City shall inspect, control, and administer the work
in progress. Metro shall have the right to review and inspect
the work in progress and at completion.
2
Section 5. Basic Agreement Unchanged. The City shall
comply with all provisions of the Basic Agreement without
qualification or condition,by reason of any provision or
interpretation of this Agreement, it being the intention of the
parties that the Basic Agreement shall not otherwise be affected
or modified hereby.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed
this agreement as of the date and year first written above.
CITY OF KENT
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
MUNICIPALITY OF METROPOLITAN
SEATTLE
Richard K. Sandaas
Executive Director
ATTEST:
Bonnie Mattson
Clerk of the Council
3
i
/•C. e f
.,
•t.` _f C 1. •Y �•��` �\Y}iiI w ry C 1 t h> ♦t{ C. � t`M � _
)- a t = -a afk ••F,7 s£. ti n t�. . s .Y>����'� '. 1 k'.
Lei £^r _ .aJ\.s y�lsy "�+4 � �f '.. • .Cs .^ X(.2 i. i yi^st i
l3 * �;>,�va}x�r}�''s�:�%f a �{C'Pt .t'fi •£�*\ s•.h.� �n'� � s
1i a b`',r L � •y ���'{r" � ,! �kf,'f,r• r `�♦q \ • >Z<e � � ..
ee'ek M `{,•• ...»vcs}} `s x,�:•, �r•;r. !\ Y.a shy tr > o
,,, �.Y(B♦Wi.•.- s t:t N S 16 ' 4 .._. '�, yr �:
N ,
s s y t
co
•
i SYu }..4 x `��� s'� 'kf' `k;;l(} a� �a,,,,,•` -�.� `® c S.:.e. I�
F (, t
-•'� .Yz .� +�, , `- 7yf�ik >\+: �•♦ �.• iw2..Lltl YY7 't<::_ is X
s € _
r is i:'\H�, ti.. "(� i � ` ry �� .� ••'2+.d" gY =°
'Tff
1.41
wl
'�'Z&.yt • . . tt��l. 'Y`t • r.Y:; ) Ott ) 'C.
♦.�,3 �y:: .( a.w P �yxn x #: rJS'3r.ratr rer'�tS;.. 7 t �.,
`t � � � •� �'-:+E � r $� ♦�•. r+...yam •4, t � ,.t ..
t♦ C r �J.s ,i a
ry L i�.
' Y�� WWwMMM TTT
> t
�3. �♦�'�is
Y y
1
Kent City Council Meeting
� N Date January 2 . 1991
! tiG category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: PARKING IN FRONT OF CENTENNIAL BUILDING
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: (-_As recommended by_the Public Works
• - - --
ee; doption of Ord nanird c- 7, amending the City code to
change the parking limits on the two stalls near the west
driveway of City Hall to two-hour limits, the one stall between
the two-hour stalls in the crosswalk to a passenger load only
and the two stalls between the crosswalk and the driveway east
of the Centennial Building to 30 minutest
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Public Works Director and excerpt
from Public Works Committee minutes
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
Public Works Committee
December 18 , 1990
Page 4
utility. That way we know where the taxes are going. Orr stated
that was the reason for her earlier question. White asked that
Wickstrom include the two options in his presentation to the
Council.
Landscaping - Scenic Hill Reservoir
Jack Cosby stated the neighbors around the Scenic Hill Reservoir
site would like to see it landscaped as it is an eyesore to the
community. Wickstrom stated that a preliminary review estimates it
would require a budget of approximately $15, 000. Additional
concerns are whether we have sufficient maintenance staff to
provide continual care for said landscaping once its in. The funds
would come from the unencumbered fund balance of the water utility.
Wickstrom stressed that if the Committee wanted to proceed a budget
would have to be established along with providing the necessary
maintenance personnel. It was concluded that staff should work
with Jack Cosby in putting together a plan that would satisfy the
residents and meet the City' s needs. That could be brought back
before the Committee with a proposed budget.
Metro - Infiltration/Inflow
Wickstrom explained that Metro did a pilot study in Kent' s North
Park area on water seepage into the sewer system. They studied
whether rehab of the system including side sewers up to the houses
would be cost effective. Metro would pay 54% of the project costs.
The goal of the project is to reduce the amount of
infiltration/inflow into the Metro system which will help to
minimize the ultimate expansion of the treatment plan. Funds were
included and approved in the 1991 budget requests. Wickstrom
stated he was recommending we proceed with the project. The
Committee unanimously recommended approval .
Parking - Front of Centennial Building
Ed White stated he was recommending that the two stalls near the
west driveway into City Hall remain with a two hour limit, the one
stall between these two-hour stalls and the crosswalk be designated
as Passenger Load Only and the two stalls -between the crosswalk and
the driveway east of the Centennial' Building be 30 minute parking.
The Committee unanimously concurred with the recommendations and
recommended the ordinance be amended making these changes.
Jim White brought up the matter of City utility vehicles being
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
December 13, 1990
TO: Public Works Co it tee
FROM: Don Wickstro4 \J
RE: Parking in Front of Centennial Building
Now that the Centennial Building has been constructed, there is a
need to determine what type of parking should be allowed on Gowe
Street, in particular in front of the Centennial Building.
We are recommending that the two stalls near the west driveway into
City Hall remain two-hour limits; the one stall between the two-
hour stalls and the crosswalk be signed as Passenger Load Only" ;
and the two stalls between the crosswalk and driveway east of the
Centennial Building be 30 minutes. The existing City Code will
need to be amended to include these changes.
This scheme has been discussed with Doug Klappenbach and he
supports this action.
r''t
C�
KENT CITY COUNCIL
REVISED ACTION
+y � 1 ITEM NO. 3H CONSENT CALENDAR
\� JANUARY 2 , 1991
�75l: ARTERIAL CLASSIFICATION
ywze
the---Pub-lic- Wer-k-9 COMM ttee, Adoption of
Resolution Mt.9 amending the City of Kent Comprehensive
Transportation Plan to include Lind Avenue from East Valley
Highway to 180th and to classify same as a minor arterial3 cl�
�U"1'�'1�✓r�-r-�-'k=-
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 . 1991
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: ARTERIAL CLASSIFICATION - ORDINANCE
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Public Works
Committee, adoption of _Q.rd4aa4jce al L`b designating 196th/Russell
Road from Green River to West Valley Highway; 196th Street from
West Valley Highway to East Valley Highway and 196th/92nd Avenue
from East Valley to 92nd Avenue be classified as principal
arterials and Lind Avenue from East Valley Highway to 180th be
classified as a minor arterial.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Public Works Director, vicinity map
and excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
3N
Public Works Committee
December 18, 1990
Page 5
parked in the City Hall lot. Tony McCarthy stated there is no
where else for them to park when the employees need to be at City
Hall. There are no assigned spaces in the Centennial Building
parking garage for these vehicles. It was suggested that something
could be worked out to share those stalls in the Centennial garage.
Arterial Classification - 196th Corridor and Lind Avenue
Wickstrom stated that in order to get TIB funding we need to have
the route classified on the Federal system. We are proposing to
have it classified as a principal arterial. In addition, in
conjunction with our EVH improvement, we will have a TIA grant
application and need to classify Lind Avenue as a minor arterial in
order to be eligible for funding. The Committee unanimously
recommended adoption of the ordinance classifying these streets as
proposed.
Mrs. Snodderly Claim - Property on Alexander
This resident has filed a claim for $25 to reimburse her for mowing
the grass on City property on Alexander Avenue. Wickstrom
explained that we do not have sufficient City staff to mow the
property weekly but we do maintain it two to three times a year.
The Committee felt there must be some way to express appreciation
for what Mrs. Snodderly did and to encourage the residents of the
City to care for their area. The Committee asked staff to put
together some type of award program whereby Mrs. Snodderly could be
recognized for her efforts.
Guardrail - Reith Road
Ed White stated there have been several requests to install guard
rail at two locations on Reith Road. We can apply for Hazard
Elimination funds for this guard rail project or transfer funds
from other safety improvements. An original estimate for the
project was $15, 000.. However, by reducing the length of the
guardrail the cost can be brought to approximately $9, 000. Jim
White stated he would like to know which safety improvements
projects we would be transferring funds from. The Committee
recommended this item be brought before Council with a list of
those projects from which the funds would be transferred.
Fraaer Road and Russell Road Closure Along S . 212th 'Street
John Bond stated that the accident ranking of the intersections of
Frager Road and Russell Road at S. 212th has been on the State' s
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
December 12, 1990
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom
RE: Arterial Classification - 196th Corridor
In order to be eligible to apply for TIB funding it is necessary to
classify portions of the route according to the Federal system.
As such it is recommended that 196th/Russell Road from Green River
to West Valley Highway, that 196th Street from West Valley Highway
to East Valley Highway and that 196th/92nd Avenue from East Valley
Highway to 92nd Avenue be classified as principal arterials.
It is also recommended - based on Renton's designation of Lind
Avenue north of 180th - that Lind Avenue from East Valley Highway
to 180th be classified as a minor arterial. Our Transportation
Engineer feels Lind Avenue could be designated as a principal
arterial; however, it is recommended we remain consistent with
Renton's classification at this time.
rb1.f f'r � lwi OIrf Il 3 [rrw
♦Vf 3 �i rrfw ♦V, 3 r PVS 3
\ RO l w 4rw 1n l ` SAW
Y � w
V\I of Mf a�a`i1f
70 all,ZV1
�. S`E==L,1
C
.00
w i y L
' IMuWW Ifa•1 C
L ; ur AV
IMufR'Y1 RaN � � � r v
- T +
44 tiLi !CI
l " �
1r•o+.YW POW T 2 Z 1 I ,
P...L
• TOT { t1r
=wj AMr 7_ ww r
OTw 1 y _ yw "fw
r]Z rlwU .n
y r• O
} C 3 Y.ofoou
M. > i tt�1
i
L .�
f nn
- r a far l y
•• y Q
• I 2
^ POIIr .Vl 3 I _ � I Wlr� AVl �
m 1
A f m[w Pau T w
3131 All
9L Z c
Al
p O
Rr n. •vf a
.r rw.f if POl _ -- -- - • n
11 in
L I
a
M
�r AVM33t13 A3llVA _
Al
TORENTpr/
mo
7�a
0
V
` Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 . 1990
Category Consent Calendar
k. _GJ ,G7 - PJX3-ER-_ROAn_AND-._RUZSErhi, ROAD CLOSURE AiiONG-S@:--2-IQTFH
ST.REE.T ----------
As recommended b the _Public Works 'wcnmlfe
eexH�#tT restriction of` all througFi-and left turning movements
from Frager and Russell Roads onto So. 212th Street and
authorization to transfer $10, 640 from the Street Fund to Frager
Road and So. 212th Street Fund -
3 . EXHIBITS: IBC note and excerpt from Public Works Committee
minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
3X
Guardrail - Reith Road
Ed White stated there have been several requests to install guard
rail at two locations on Reith Road. We can apply for Hazard
Elimination funds for this guard rail project or transfer funds
from other safety improvements. An original estimate for the
project was $15, 000. However, by reducing the length of the
guardrail the cost can be brought to approximately $9, 000. Jim
White stated he would like to know which safety improvements
projects we would be transferring funds from. The Committee
recommended this item be brought before Council with a list of
those projects from which the funds would be transferred.
Frager Road and Russell Road Closure Along S. 212th Street
John Bond stated that the accident ranking of the intersections of
Frager Road and Russell Road at S. 212th has been on the State' s
high hazard list for many years. It is recommended that the
turning movements at these intersections be restricted throughout
the whole day. To change the turning movements to right in and
right out only at these intersections would cost approximately
$15, 620 for which we would transfer funds from the street overlay
fund. Dennis Byerly stated that to the best of his knowledge the
Police Department concurs with the action. The Committee
unanimously recommended approval of restricting the turning
movements as proposed and reallocating the funds.
Water System Plan Amendment
Wickstrom explained the amendment consists primarily of
clarification of issues raised in the DSHS review of our 1988 plan.
since the original plan was adopted by ordinance, this amendment
would have to be adopted by ordinance as well. The Committee
unanimously recommended adoption of the amendments of the Water
System Plan.
Emergency Slide Repair - Canyon Road at 94th
Wickstrom explained that during the recent storm there was a slide
in Mill Creek in the vicinity of 94th on Canyon Drive side. The
slide is about ten feet from the pavement and is due to saturated
fill. Since the integrity of Canyon Drive could be in jeopardy, it
is recommended the repair be declared an emergency so that we might
forego the normal bidding requirements and proceed with the repair.
It is estimated the repair would be $100, 000 which would be paid
from the unencumbered funds of the sewerage utility. We will also
seek FEMA reimbursement. The Committee unanimously concurred with
the request,
City of Kent, Washington Kent Public Works Comm.
Date 12/18/90
Category
1. SUBJECT:
Frager. Road and Russell Road Closure along S. 212th Street
+ 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT:
The above referenced intersections have been on the High
Hazard list for several years, always ranking in the top 5.
In an effort to reduce the accident rates, turns and through
movements from the side streets onto S . 212th were restricted
during the morning and evening travel hours. However,
accident rates are still high (28 from January 1989 to
September 1990) . It is recommended that all through and left
turning movements be restricted throughout the whole day
rather than during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. We have
estimated the cost of installing islands, signing, pavement
markers, etc. to be approximately $15, 620. We are proposing
to transfer funds from the Asphalt Overlay project for this
closure.
3 . EXHIBITS:
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
Don Wickstrom
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES x
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended_
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $15 , 620
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Asphalt Overlay Funds
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
SIEGEL,KAREN / KENT70/PW - HPDesk print.
----------------------------------------
Message. Dated: 12/20/90 at 1451 .
bject: FRAGER & RUSSELL ROAD CLOSURE
Sender: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Contents: 3.
TO: Karen SIEGEL / KENT70/PW
Part 1.
TO: Paul SCOTT / KENT70/PW
Karen SIEGEL / KENT70/PW
Don WICKSTROM / KENT70/PW
CC: Ed CHOW / KENT70/AD
Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN
Part 2.
THE FISCAL NOTE FOR THE JANUARY 2ND COUNCIL MEETING.
Part 3.
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING $15,620 OF ASPHALT OVERLAY FUNDS
FOR THE CLOSURE OF FRAGER AND RUSSELL ROADS ALONG S. 212TH. THE REQUEST IS
BEING MADE TO REDUCE ACCIDENT RATES AT THE INTERSECTIONS.
SINCE THE AMOUNT REQUESTED HAS ALREADY BEEN ACCOUNTED FOR IN PROVIDING GENERAL
FUND BEGINNING FUND BALANCE FOR THE 1991 BUDGET. AND SINCE COUNCIL APPROVAL WILL
REQUESTED AT A 1991 COUNCIL MEETING, THE IBC RECOMMENDS THE PROJECT BUT WITH
r� VARIATION ON THE FUNDING SOURCE REQUEST. THE IBC RECOMMENDS THE USE OF
UNSPENT FRAGER ROAD AND S. 212TH FUNDS WITH AN AVAILABLE CASH BALANCE AS OF
DECEMBER 14, 1990 OF $4,980.86, WITH THE REMAINING REQUEST COMING FROM THE
STREET FUND WHICH ORIGINALLY FUNDED THE FRAGER ROAD AND S. 212TH PROJECT.
J Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 , 1991
Category Consent Calendar
WATER SYSTEM PLAN
As recommended by--the Public Works
uthorization to adopt Ordinance J q I,, .> adopting the
addendum to the Water System Plan. f _
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Public Works Director and excerpt
from Public Works Committee minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works •Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FIS PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL PERSONNE NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OFFUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
,:3 T
Public Works Committee
December 18, 1990
Page 6
high hazard list for many years. It is recommended that the
turning movements at these .intersections be restricted throughout
the whole day. To change the turning movements to right in and
right out only at these intersections would cost approximately
$15, 620 for which we would transfer funds from the street overlay
fund. Dennis Byerly stated that to the best of his knowledge the
Police Department concurs with the action. The Committee
unanimously recommended approval of restricting the turning
movements as proposed and reallocating the funds.
Water System Plan Amendment
Wickstrom explained the amendment consists primarily of
clarification of issues raised in the DSHS review of our 1988 plan.
Since the original plan was adopted by ordinance, this amendment
would have to be adopted by ordinance as well . The Committee
unanimously recommended adoption of the amendments of the Water
System Plan.
Emergency Slide Repair - Canyon Road at 94th
Wickstrom explained that during the recent storm there was a slide
in Mill Creek in the vicinity of 94th on Canyon Drive side. The
slide is about ten feet from the pavement and is due to saturated
fill. Since the integrity of Canyon Drive could be in jeopardy, it
is recommended the repair be declared an emergency so that we might
forego the normal bidding requirements and proceed with the "repair.
It is estimated the repair would be $100, 000 which would be paid
from the unencumbered funds of the sewerage utility. We will also
seek FEMA reimbursement. The Committee unanimously concurred with
the request,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
December 12, 1990
TO: Public Works Committee
FROM: Don Wickstrom
RE: Water System Plan
We have made revisions to our Water System Plan in response to
letters received from regulatory agencies after review of our draft
plan.
r These revisions will be incorporated as an addendum to the original
plan. There were no significant changes requested as most items
were requests for clarification. The attached delineates the
questions raised and our response.
It is proposed these revisions be adopted by ordinance.
CITY OF JD-%L� u
Dan Kelleher, Mayor
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E., Director of Public Works
I '
The City of Kent Celebrates Its First 100 Years
December 7, 1990
Moe Batra
Department of Social and Health Services
217 Pine, Suite 220
Seattle, Washington 98101
RE: City of Kent Water System Plan
Dear Moe:
In 1988, the city submitted to DSHS for review and comment a draft
of its updated Water System Plan (WSP) . DSHSSrs review thereof
resulted in the questions/concerns raised in the attached letter of
November 3 , 1988 . While it has been some time, the following
attachments represent our response thereto.
RESPONSE TO DSHS QUESTIONS/CONCERNS
Question/Concern RESPONSE
1 Page 47 has been amended to reflect
duration. A definition for "fire flow"
was also added. These parameters (rate
of flow, pressure and duration) are
adequate to tie down fire flows.
2 A The City has adopted land use plans which
depict what the potential uses of all
lands will be. These uses, however,
range the full gamut from open space to
industrial . For the purpose of the Water
System Plan, saturated development is
full build out in accordance with said
plans. While at first blush, it is easy
to construe saturated development as 100%
pave-over, in reality, as used herein, it
is not. , If you were to crank out the
numbers reflected in Table 15, Page 95 of
1
220 4th AVE.SO., J KENT.WASHINGTON 98032-5895/ENGINEERING (206)859-3383/OPERATIONS(206)859-3395/FAX#859-3334
Moe Batra
Water System Plan
December 7 , 1990
Page 2
the Plan, at least 3 , 843 acres out of
14, 278 or 27% will remain undeveloped as
either open space , parks ,
residential/agriculture, constrained
acres or water. While any development
constitutes the pave-over of recharge
area, Kent is different in that the bulk
of its supply sources (present and
future) are not within its water service
area. As such, it is felt that were the
City to develop to saturated
development,the recharge areas of its
sources would not be significantly
impacted. The Water System Plan
considered the saturated development
scenario as a reality check on the City's
land use plan. If the supply therefor
wasn't available then, obviously, the
land use plan would be impacted. When
considering the WSP's capital improvement
program, the source development therein
is not the typical one of well
development. Instead, via the
impoundment project, it stresses
conservation of the natural resource by
withdrawing from our existing sources
when surpluses are available and storing
it for use during the critical periods.
2 B "Recent total loss of the aquifer" meant
the water table dropped below the intake
level of the pumps. However, since
development of the WSP, we found that our
low water level sensors which control the
pumps were faulty. With their
replacement we have found that the Kent
Springs source now has a firm summer time
yield of 1 MGD. Yes, we do monitor the
static water levels at our wells and the
Kent Springs water table historically
fluctuates from high to low annually.
2 C The results of our exploratory drilling
essentially implies that high yield
(greater than 1 MGD) wells do not readily
exist within our service area. So,
Moe Batra
Water System Plan
December 7, 1990
Page 3
looking for a cheap quick fix to a peak
supply problem is probably a waste of
time and money. As such, as identified
in the WSP, we look to the impoundment
project to both maximize the sustained
yield from our existing source while
significantly increasing our peaking
capability. The aquifers associated with
both Kent Springs and Clark Springs
sources recharge fully each year.
Combining the renewable excess winter
supply availability with storage
capability such as the impoundment
project, thus, greatly increases our
sustainable and peaking capacity. With
respect to supply needs met by the
intertie, both now and into the future,
the percentage is zero. The WSP denotes
reliance on our interties with Water
District #75 and the City of Tukwila to
diminish after 1990 which is still on
track. Actual use of these sources,
however, has not occurred since
development of the draft WSP. The Plan
also denotes a Tacoma intertie. This
description is really a misnomer as, in
accordance with the agreement with
Tacoma, the City will actually own a
share of the facilities and water rights
associated with delivery of our 4 . 62 MGD
supply. As such, an intertie which
relies on the purchasing of water and the
whim of the jurisdiction, it is not.
3 We agree with the need to develop
protection program for both our well
heads and their recharge areas. Because
the majority of our supplies and their
associated recharge areas lie within King
County, we have pursued this issue,
including financially, as an active
member in -the development of the Ground
Water Management Plan for South King
County.
Moe Batra
Water System Plan
December 7, 1990
Page 4
4 The South King County CWSP does recommend
a water conservation program. A copy of
the program is attached. I have
indicated the areas where the City has
taken an active role. To expand thereon,
with respect to public education, the
City annually sponsors a conservation
skit in association with the East Side
Regional Water Association that
circulates through all the elementary
schools within the City' s water service
area. The City has also authorized
through its membership in the South King
County Regional Water Association the
development of a water conversation
program. At present a consultant has
been retained and development of said
program is in progress. To address a
short term drought situation or a
temporary supply problem, the City has
adopted by ordinance (copy enclosed)
water use curtailment regulations and/or
restrictions. With respect to utilizing
the rate structure as a conservation
mechanism, the City presently has a flat
rate commodity charge system. The city
converted from a declining block rate
system (with minimum allowances) to the
flat rate system in 1981 and in 1984
raised that rate to $1. 64 per 100 cf for
customers within City limits and $2 . 00
per 100 cf for outside customers. In
1984 this was probably the highest
commodity charge rate in the State and
even today it still appears to be in the
upper 20 percentile. Along with the
adoption of the flat rate system in 1981,
also included was a system development
charge. One purpose thereof was to
discourage the locating of new
development with significant water
demands within Kent' s water service area.
Said charge is based on meter capacity
and as noted in the Plan it equates to
$97 , 779 for a 10-inch meter. Even with a
significant commodity rate and a
Moe Batra
Water System Plan
December 7, 1990
Page 5
significant system development charge it
is difficult to conclude upon review of
historical data whether or not we have
achieved any conservation. Logic would
dictate that we have but the numbers may
be hid by the new development we have
experienced in the last 10 years.
5 With respect to the consistency between
the City' s WSP and the CWSP, we see no
significant difference. The City was
actually a key player, both financially
and implementally, in the development of
the CWSP. Attached are copies of our WSP
review by the consultant who developed
the CWSP. The WSP does reflect higher
peak day demands versus that denoted in
the CWSP but the ultimate demands of both
are about the same: The WSP is, however,
more reflective of the City' s actual
water demand. Table 14 , page 93 , of the
WSP projected our 1990 peak day demand to
be 13 .92 MGD and it actually was 14 .97
MGD. On the other hand, the CWSP
projected 12 . 85 MGD. Since both the WSP
and the CWSP are updated every five
years, any discrepancy or disparity per
population, demand, etc. can be
compensated therefor during an update.
After all, these plans are guidelines and
the actual implementation of any new
water supply source will be driven by
reality checks as to the need.
6 VOC Tests have been taken and the results
are attached.
7 With regard to the proposed storage
impoundment facility, the City recognizes
that additional analysis is necessary as
to the treatment technologies utilized
and plan to do same once implementation
of the project is more near term. With
regard to contamination from on-site
sewage systems , that, too, will probably
be a factor in selecting the actual
Moe Batra
Water System Plan
December 7 , 1990
Page 6
treatment technology. Due to the
project' s anticipated implementation date
1 (2008) , the surrounding area may be fully
served by sewers by that time. With
respect to lining the .facility, the soils
investigative work done to date denotes
that seepage will not be a big factor.
Also that lining a facility of this
magnitude will not prevent seepage due to
the reality of construction capabilities.
Seepage on the other hand would result in
a ground water mound under the reservoir
which would have the positive aspect of
impeding the inflow of contaminants. It
also has the potential of aquifer
recharge for which the city may want to
consider well development thereof.
With regard to the algae discrepancy, the
test results on page 213 were early
results based on the consultant's
misconception of how the facility was to
operate plus assumed phosphorus
concentration of inflow water.
Subsequent analysis predicated on the
planned operation scenario of the
facility and actual measured phosphorus
content of the inflow sources is depicted
on page 214 . These conclusions
correspond to the statements on page 113 .
Moe Batra
Water System Plan
December 7 , 1990
Page 7
8 We circulated the plan to our neighboring
purveyors including those we have
interties with and the City of Seattle
and the following denotes the comments
received:
Plan Sent To Comments Received
Water District ill None
Auburn None
Renton None
Tukwila None
Water District 75 See attached
Soos Creek Water and Sewer District See attached -
Seattle None
Very truly yours,
Don E. Wickstrom, P.E.
Director of Public Works
Enclosures
Table 2
Minimum Fire Flow Requirements
REQUIRED FLOWS
State:
Rural (lots greater than 1 acre) None
Residential 500 gpm for 30 minutes
Commercial and Multi-Family
(greater than 4,000 sq. ft.) 750 gpm for 60 minutes
Industrial 1,000 gpm for 60 minutes
City:
Residential 1,000 gpm for 60 minutes
Commercial 1,000 to 2,000 gpm for 120 minutes
Industrial 2,000 gpm for 120 minutes
NOTE: The City requirements exceed or equal those of King County.
.Also, City code defines 'Fire Flow' as the measure of the sustained flow of available
water for fighting fire at a specific building or within a specific area at 20 psi residual
pressure.
- 47 -
££-IIA
OrII 'S30IA?ISS OHI2iS31dI9H3 (IMY 01310H003
%O pO � a.
U l�W Nr+ V O. UL� W N r• K1 . . In .
m
m m O C rW
Pf n m 6 w .W.
r• r n �, .m
00 K m m d m -0R n rt n n o Y•
r•m 9 -0 m tl tl n ` m 14
O N 0 0 m K m m nZ1tl CH "
o ' " • r• ' v
nRm 9 m % m O O m m 00 OH w n n O n a' m e d tl a o % Y.H m 0 L L m a 00 n m O m :r d
.•' m Y.O 0 n C £ c % £14 d o d 9 't C 7 .+ % r•S C 00 B 00 w -O c
ry a' C n n Y•Y•r. n m m n w 0 m r•00 O m a' n r. m R O m r a m K 7C 0 n
Tl m ry m m tl n Y• m n H H N H Y•14 m % m m m
C o m n W.0' 7 C m Y•O % `C R w m 0 c m m ? H.C n O 10 w B K rt
7 c n m m r. n Kl w ry o K W. w W.'a 00 8 % n O m 0 w ry 'd W. W % O Y•
.•+ n O m O W.M r' K n 00 `G d O '•1 O m m R 3' >• C m m r w % O 'd c 0 .
w n n c 0 m m 0 'm r.M\ m C r• tl 'd O n O m o Y•\n a B n C 'IW n o
n W. m n % t m 0 0 W cn ry ry o \H W. O'm B n O tl a n N % Y•w m O c K M
O m C W.O m 0 % 7 ry m m w n m 'd r• w d H m m r 00 00 O n % .+ tl 9 K m .�
m 0 K n 0 m m H H O - K C L r•,4 n m O m m m
d d r• Y. Y• O ry 'd n % % r• n W.Y•m v % 00 n r•7 0. m \m tl n w n B
0 m 0 0 S m e tl o0 9 •e o n n r•n 3 d r•a >• m
n m d w 14 ry o' W 0 0 .- tl tl m c. w ac m m tl c m m w c o tl
w m m 0 w ry n 09 M w R R \B n r• M
n c M C. m o0 .• tl o K .-• .. m o m H m m 0 m c rt n R w
Y• 8 0 tl K m 9 w n v K m 0 0 K n R 9 c £ m W. r• .-.
o m ry m 0. 0- m w o r 9 o ;a .. m n E < R m .- m y K w \ 1 K r
o d n 8 % O m U c m K m m \ L K m m " n 'd % v
m m rt 0 •0 m % n M ."'' rt Y• w W. O
ry O ry n 00 n 7 0 c % H m K r• % m w tl 0 o
0 n m W.m m 00 r•M m r• n 0.14 d ao r 0 .-
00a'an 08 o n 0 \ n M \ 'x m 9 %4
w m K m w 0 U C ry w r• w m ry �' %' PV K 91
B m w F•• n O m m � . O R .-+ r• R Y•
n n o m O n n 0 0 7 an d 9 o t7 a n
w o' 0 0. •0 o c n K
m r.tl \ ry w n 9 m m
% m m 0 0 m C m n C
C C W.n 00 m % K O a % m .-• n m
e m d K c R % 9 c
Y•
a r „ 0 8 1 9 w H a O 0
n m rt O m p' m G. 0R 0 m
O V, Y•n ry n %
'i O `C m 0 m .. ..
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .
^ 0 zw
r• B
c14 m ��° o o � se x �x xaexx x xxxxxxx xxx ry d
w m .7 • w Y• m m
n K b O. wr £ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. m W
OY• m n D 9
TOG n W.d K x x x x x X x x x x X x x X m tz
n
O O' n Y• v � tl `�
B m r.S .. .. .. .. .. n
O' % tl m Y. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. •• .. •. .. C
W. r. R n O .. .. .. •. •. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .• .. .. •. C .. 'd O O H
tl % m r•
m o m m m ^ ry �
a
x ® X x x® ® c cn
z
n m m t*i
rt R tl _ •• x m a �
ry 7 U m r•v7 O b
m m O ••C x xx X xxX xXxX O n •y oq.
O n O C .. .. .. .. ..
d G K m m o r•
o v x x m
00 K n n w
ry O'00
c .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. w
9 9
tl m
m m x x x xx xxxx o v
v
m o nm
tl n n
m 7 n
Y• m "'
C o
m N
OQ
Y•
O N w N 6 £
w U v m
ry •
00 N ~ b m
! I
ORDINANCE NO. (??a-? 7
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, establishing rules and regulations '
for rationing water during a water shortage
emergency and establishing penalties for vio-
lations thereof.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON, DO
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Kent has
and does hereby declare that a water shortage emergency condition
prevails irk the area served by the City of Kent Water Division
due to a lack of supply and transmission capabilities. This Ordi-
nance is intended to allocate equitably the water available to
the City of Kent's Water Division during such emergency to the
end that sufficient water will be available for human consumption,
sanitation and fire protection.
Section 2. Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordi-
nance, the following terms, phrases, words, and their derivations
1 shall have the meaning given herein. When not inconsistent with
the .context, words used in the present ten&s include the future,
words in the plural number include the singular number, and words
! in the singular number include the plural number. The word "shall"
I is always mandatory and not merely directory.
I A. "City" is the City of Kent.
B. "Customer" is any person using water supplied
by the City.
C. "Director" is the Director of Public Works of
the City of Kent.
D. "Person" is any person, firm, partnership, asso-
ciation, corporation, company, or organization of
any kind.
E. "East side of Kent" is all that portion of the
City easterly of SR 167.
F. "Water" is water from the Water Division of the
City of Kent's Public Works Department.
G. "West side of Kent" is all. that portion of the
City westerly of SR 167.
Section 3. Application. The provisions of this Ordi-
nance shall apply to all customers using;.water both in and out-
. �
i
side the City, regardless of whether any customer using water
ce with the City.
shall have contract for water servi
t
Sect�o=4 Mandatory Regulations. From and after the
fifteenth day of May in each year in which this ordinance is
made effective, no person or customer shall sprinkle, .water, or
lawns,
irrigate any shrubbe grass, ground covers, plants
shrubbery,. trees, vegetation or
vines, gardens, vegetables, flowers, or any other
wash any sidewalk, driveway, porch or other outdoor surface except
as follows: A. Such irrigation, sprinkling, watering and wash-
ing down shall be permitted on the West side of
Xent on even numbered days of the calendar.
watering and
g. Such irrigation, sprinkling,
ing down shall be permitted on the East siddee of
o
number days of the calendar.
Xent on odd numb
Sects 5• Lar a water users. The requirements of
Section 4 of this Ordinance to the onthlycontraraverage ot lwater nuse for
o
person or customer whose historic Augustn311exceeds 133,690 cubic feet
the period from May large
throughshall irrigate,
large water users
per month, hereinafter called "
grass, ground
sprinkle, or water any shrubbery, trees, lawns,,
covers, plants, vines, gardens, vegetables, flowers or any other
except on days assigned in each week during which this
vegetation
Ordinance is i effect, said days to be assigned by the Director
after consultation with the individual large water users.
Section site Design Review. While this Ordinance
or landscaping required by the site
is in effect, no planting implemented
design review process or other City action shall be
s that the health, safety, or welfare
unless the City determine
of the public might be endangered.
Sects�• Director Ma Prohibit vai blion. When-
Section any irrigation,
ever the Director determines that the water available to the
City's Water Department is insufficient to pto said
watering, or sprinkling and that all water then availablsanitation
Department should be used solely for human consumption,
and fire protection, he may order and direct that irrigation,
shall not be permitted by any person or
watering, or sprinkling no person or customer
customer. While such order is in effect,
2 -
i
occurs first. The City Council may extend the
effective date of the Ordinance in any year by
adopting a resolution to that effect.
Section 11. This Ordinance shall take effect and be
in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and
publication as provided by law.
ISABEL HOGAN, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
A ROVED AS TO FORM: aL ,
DONALD E. MIRK, CITY ATTORNEY � � 'e'p
PASSED the �` day of May, 1980.
I
Vetoed by Mayor Hogan Ma 20, 1980
Passed over the veto Jnn,�
Published
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance
No, __ , passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, he-Eiy—af'Rerit as here-
on indicated.
o (SEAL)
MA JENSEA , CITY CLERIC
q -
i
ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.
Management Consultants
P.O. Box 976 • 626 Columbia N.W. • Suite 2A
Olympia, Washington 98507
(206) 352-5090
April 18, 1989
File No. 4281.1
Mr. Don E. Wickstrom, Director
Department of Public Works
220 S 4th
Kent, WA 98032
Dear Don:
We have reviewed your Water System Plan (WSP) for consistency with the South
King County Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) . The WSP is very well laid
out and quite impressive, especially the figures and tables.
y
The areas reviewed as suggested by the Department of Social and Health Services
(DSHS) , included population projections, minimum design standards, and service
area boundaries are discussed below. A discussion of water demand, satellite
management, Pipeline No. 5 and conservation has also been included.
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
The WSP uses a recent population projection prepared by the City, which applies
an annual compounded growth rate of 3.13 percent. This results in a population
projection of 42,530 in 1993 and 57,900 in 2003. Population at saturation was
estimated to be 106,557.
In contrast, the CWSP used Puget Sound Council of Governments (PSCOG) June 1988
population figures for FAZs 3420, 3500, and 3600, the resulting population is
estimated to be 35,064 in 1993 and 41,710 in 2003. It was assumed the Kent
service area encompasses approximately 10, 50, and 85 percent, respectively, of
these FAZs and 64,777 by 2040. PSCOG figures show an average compounded growth
rate of 2.0 percent per'year between 1990 and 2000, and 1.2 percent per year
between 2000 and 2020.
In summary, the City's estimates appear high by comparison to the CWSP.
WATER DEMAND
Peak daily per capita demands result in numbers of similar magnitude. The CWSP
uses average annual and peak day demands of 180 and 396 gpcd for FAZs 3500 and
3600, and 140 and 336 gpcd for FAZ 3420, respectively. The peak day demands in
the WSP are 361 gpcd in 1993 and 348 gpcd in 2003. Therefore, the per capita
consumption rates are similar, but the City's water demands are higher as a
result of the higher population estimate.
Utility Applications•Resource Management• Financial Analysis• Product Forecasting•Antitrust
Bellevue, Washington Olympia, Washington Washington, D.C.
Mr. Don E. Wickstrom, Director
April 18, 1989
Page 2
The WSP shows a peak day demand of 13.92 MGD in 1990, 18.72 MGD in 2000 and
28.32 MGD in 2020. The CWSP shows peak demand figures of 12.85 MGD in 1990,
15.62 MGD in 2000, and 19.76 MGD in 2020.
MINIMUM DESIGN STANDARDS
In order to reflect minimum design standards in the CWSP the following sections
in the WSP should be revised to read:
Section 1 - System Design
"In general, all water distribution systems shall conform to the design
requirements of the State of Washington Department of Social and Health
Services (DSHS) , and the South King County Coordinated Water System Plan
(CWSP) , as well as the City of Kent design requirements as stated
herein."
Section 1.2 - Water System Pressure
"The system shall be designed to maintain a minimum pressure of 20 psi at
ground level at all points in the distribution system under fire flow
conditions and 30 psi under all other conditions of flow, including maxi-
mum instantaneous demand. "
PIPELINE NO. 5
The WSP mentions agreement with the City of Tacoma to financially participate
in construction of Pipeline No. 5. This appears consistent with the CWSP. In
addition, the project is budgeted in the five-year capital improvement plan
under the project heading of Tacoma Intertie. You may be asked to identify
what is included in these costs.
WATER CONSERVATION
The WSP does not appear to address water conservation. The CWSP does recommend
conservation at a regional level, as well as at the utility level. It is
intended that a conservation program be established by 1995. Please refer to
Section VII.5.C. (1) of the CWSP for a description of proposed program. You may
want to include a discussion on how your utility intends to approach future
conservation implementation.
Mr. Don E. Wickstrom, Director
April 18, 1989
Page 3
SATELLITE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT
It appears that the City will not participate in Satellite System Management.
SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY
The service area boundary map provided in the WSP appears to be consistent with
the map provided for the CWSP document.
If you have any questions about the above responses or would like additional
information on the CWSP, please call me at (206) 352-5090.
Thank you for the opportunity to review your plan. Again, the total presenta-
tion of the document is impressive.
Sincerely,
John M. Maxwell, P.E.
Vice President
JMM:jmh:A
CITY OF Wii
ECONOMIC AND ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. JUN r 5 1yoy
Management Consultants EfvfIhIFFR!N! �`07
P.O. Box 976 • 626 Columbia N.W. • Suite 2A
Olympia,Washington 98507
(206)352-5090
June 14, 1989
File No. 4281.1
Mr. Don Wickstrom
City of Kent
PO Box 310
Kent, WA 98031
Subject: Population Projections - Saturation
Dear Don:
This letter confirms the discussion we held in May regarding population and water demand
estimates presented in the Coordinated Water System Plan (CWSP) and your individual
Water System Plan update. The CWSP presents individual demand forecasts for Kent in
Appendix I. These numbers were derived from the draft of your individual Water System
Plan. Both the draft and the final update of your individual Water System Plan identify satu-
ration peak day demands of approximately 30-32 MGD occurring in 2030.
The CWSP does not estimate when saturation occurs. Our analysis used population forecasts
from Puget Sound Council of Governments within the Forecast Analysis Zones covered by
Kent's future service area. We did not duplicate the same population at saturation levels
noted in your plan (i.e., 167,000 people). We did closely correlate to the 30-32 MGD water
demand in the draft CWSP. The explanation for this is in higher per capita per day consump-
tion rates used in the draft CWSP than that used by Kent in its individual Plan. Per capita
consumption in the final CWSP correlates directly with the rates used in the WSP. Hence,
the demand projected for 2040 in the CWSP is 228 MGD, which is less than the WSP figure.
In summary, the final CWSP follows the same projections as in the WSP in the short-term
(i.e. through 2000), PSCOG figures are then used through 2020, and a straight-line projection
from 2020 to 2040 is assumed. Demand is population-driven, using the per capita demand
figures calculated for 2000. The difference in the projections is only in the long-term, and
depends on when saturation actually occurs. Updates of the CWSP and WSP every 5 years
should closely monitor and compare population trends.
Utility Applications•Resource Management• Financial Analysis• Product Forecasting•Antitrust
Bellevue, Washington Olympia, Washington Washington, D.C.
Mr. Don Wickstrom
June 14, 1989
Page 2
I hope this information is of assistance. Please let me know if you need any further clarifica-
tions.
Sincerely,
John M. Maxwell, P.E.
Vice President
JMM:jmh:A
cc: Lisa Raysby
State of Washington
Department of Social and Health Services
Division of Health
Public Health Laboratories
1610 N. E. 150th'St. , Seattle, WA 98155
(206)361-2898
Lab Number : 5401285 Customer : CITY OF KENT/T. HEYDON
Date collected : 6/26/89 Address : 220 4TH AVE. So.
Date Received : 6/26/89 City : KENT
Date Tested : 7/5/89 State, Zip WA , 98032
Date File : >1G05H: :D2 County KING
System ID Number : 381501 System Name : CITY OF KENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Composited Samples
DSHS Source Number : S02
Source )lame : CLARK SPRINGS-1, 2,3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Composited Samples
Number of Sources Used in Composite : N/A
DSHS Source #'a Composited : N/A
Analysis of Individual Sources Necessary : N/A
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyst PAMELA Date of Report �'
Instrument MS #I Analyst's Initials Rik '
Supervisor's Initials
Results of Analysis et by EPA Method od 524.2
Regulated Compounds
EPA *Amount
Code Compound Name MCL(ug/1) (ug/1) Compliance
------ ------------------- ---------- -------- ----••-----
2976 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 0. 0 YES
2977 101-DICHLOROETHYLENG 7 0. 0 YES
2961 101, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 200 0. 0 YES
2982 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 0. 0 YES
2990 BENZENE 5 0. 0 YI:S
2980 1, 2-DICHLOROETHANE 5 0.0 YES
2984 TRICHLORETHYLENE 5 0. 0 YGS
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 0. 0 YES
*Note: An Amount of 0. 0 ug/l indicates that the true concentration is
less than the detection limit of the method (0. 5 uU/1 for all
compounds).
(page 1 of 3)
Lab Number 5401285
Data File >1605H: :D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524.2
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Monitoring Required
*Amount
EPA Code 4 Compound Name (ug/1)
---------- ------------------------------- -------
2210 CHLOROMETHANE 0. 0
2214 BROMOMETHANE 0.0
2216 CHLOROETHANE 0.0
2979 T-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2978 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 0. 0
2416 2, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0. 0
2380 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2941 CHLOROFORM (THM) 0. 0
2410 1, 1-DICHLOROPROPENE 0.0
2983 1, 2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0. 0
2408 DIBROMOMETHANE 0. 0
2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2991 TOLUENE 0. 0
2985 1, 1, 2-TRICHLOROETHANE O. 0
2987 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0. 0
2412 1, 3-DICHLOROPROPANE 0. 0
2944 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE (THM) 0, 0
2989 CHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2986 1, 1, 1, 2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2992 ETHYL BENZENE 0. 0
2995 M/P-XYLENE 0. 0
2997 O-XYLENE 0.0
2996 STYRENE 0. 0
2942 BROMOFORM (THM) 0. 0
2993 BROMOBENZENE 0. 0
2414 1, 2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0. 0
2988 1, 1,2,2-TETRACIILOROETHANE 0. 0
2965 O-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2966 P-CHLOROTOLUENE 0. 0
2967 M-DICHLOROBENZENE 0. 0
2968 0-DICHLOROBENZENE 0. 0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/1 indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit of
the method (0. 5 ug/1 for all compounds).-
(page 2 of 3)
Lab Number : 5401285
Data File : >iG05H: :D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524. 2
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Discretionary
EPA Code * Compound Name *Amount(ug/1)
---------- ------------------------------ -------------
2218 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 0. 0
2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2994 ISOPROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2998 H-PROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2424 1t3, 5-TRIMETHYLBENZEHE 0.0
2426 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2418 1,2, 4-TRIHETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2428 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2030 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 0.0
2422 H-BUTYLBENZENE 0. 0 .
2378 1, 2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0. 0
2248 NAPHTHALENE 0. 0
2246 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.0
2420 1, 2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/1 indicates that the true
concentration is leas than the detection limit of the
method (0. 5 ug/l for all compounds).
(page 3 of 3)
State of Washington
��ptitcf
Department of Social and Health Services
Division of Health
Public Health Laboratories
1610 N. E. 150th St. , Seattle, WA 98155
(206)361-2898
Lab Number : 5401284 Customer CITY OF KENT/T. HEYDON
Date collected : 6/26/89 Address : 220 4TH AVE. SO.
Date Received ; 6/26/89 City : KENT
Date Tested : 7/5/89 State, Zip : WA , 98032
Data File : >1F05G: :D2 County : KING
System ID Number : 381501 System Name : CITY OF KENT
------------------------------------••--------------------------------
Non-Composited Samples
DSHS Source Number : S01
Source Name : KENT SPRINGS
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Composited Samples
Number of Sources Used in Composite : N/A
DSHS Source #Is Composited : N/A
Analysis of Individual Sources Necessary : N/A
---------------------------------------------P-----------------------
Analyst : PAMELA Date of Report
Instrument MS kl Analyst's Initials
Supervisor's Initials
----------------------
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524. 2
Regulated Compounds
EPA *Amount
Code Compound Name MCL(ug/1) (ug/1) Compliance
------ ------------------- ---------- -------- ----------
2976 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 0. 0 YES
2977 1, 1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 7 0.0 YES
2981 1, 1, 1-TRICHLOROETHANE 200 0. 0 YES
2982 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 0. 0 YES
2990 BENZENE 5 0. 0 YES
2980 1, 2-DICHLOROETHANE 5 0. 0 YES
2984 TRICHLORETHYLENE 5 0. 0 YES
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 0. 0 YES
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/l indicates that the true concentration is
less than the detection limit of the method (0. 5 ug/l for all
compounds).
(page 1 of 3)
Lab Number : 5401284
Data File : >1FO5G: :D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524. 2
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Monitoring Required
*Amount
EPA Code * Compound Name (ug/1)
---------- ------------------------------- ------
2210 CHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2214 BROMOMETHANE 0.0
2216 CHLOROETHANE 0.0
2979 T-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0. 0
2978 1, 1-DICHLOROETHANE 0. 0
2416 2, 2-DICHLOROPROPAHE 0. 0
2380 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEHE 0. 0
2941 CHLOROFORM (THM) 0.0
2410 1, 1-DICHLOROPROPEHE 0. 0
2983 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2408 DIBROMOMETHANE 0.0
2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2991 TOLUENE 0.0
2985 1, 1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2987 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2412 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2944 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2989 CHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2986 1, 1, 1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2992 ETHYL BENZENE 0.0
2995 M/P-XYLENE 0.0
2997 0-XYLENE 0.0
2996 STYRENE 0.0
2942 BROMOFORM (THM) 0.0
2993 BROMOBENZENE 0. 0
2414 1, 2, 3`-TRICi1LOROPROPANE 0.0
2988 1, 1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2965 0-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2966 P-CHLOROTOLUEHE 0.0
2967 M-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2968 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/1 indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit of
the method (0. 5 ug/1 for all compounds).
(page 2 of 3)
Lab Number 5401284
Data File : >IF056t :D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524.2
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Discretionary
EPA Code # Compound Have *Amount(ug/1)
---------- ------------------------------ -------------
2218 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 0.0
2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2994 ISOPROPYLBENZENE 0. 0
2998 N-PROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2424 1, 3, 5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0. 0
2426 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2418 1,2, 4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2428 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2030 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 0.0
2422 N-BUTYLBENZENE 0. 0
2378 1,2, 4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2248 NAPHTHALENE 0.0
2246 HE%ACHLOROBUTADIENE 0. 0
2420 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0. 0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/1 indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit of the
method (0. 5 ug/l for all compounds).
(page 3 of 3)
F7FG1..�tf..i_�
r: a State of Washinoton
it �• cNi Deoartment of Social and Health Services
nPt°.R,aTIGi r; Division of Health
Public Health Laboratories
1610 N.E. 150th St.. Seattle, WA 98155
(206)361-2898
axssssa aaz a xzaszaaasesx asax szxasaaxaz azzzaa aze szaa aaxasaaa_saa_zaaasa_zexxxa_axasaz_aa_s_xeaazxeazaa
Lab Number : 5401286 Customer : CITY OF KENT/TIM HEYDON
Date collected : 6-26-89 Address : 220 4TH AVE. 90.
Date Received : 6-26-89 City : KENT
Date Tested : 7/05/89 20:25 State, Zia : WA 98032
Data File : )1G051::02 County : KING
Miscellaneous Sample Information : 5401286
System ID Number : 381501 System Name : CITY OF KENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Comoosited Samples
DSHS Source Number : S05
Source Name : EAST HILL WELL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comoosited Samoles
Number of Sources Used in Composite : N/A
DSHS Source It's Comoosited : N/A
Analysis of Individual Sources Necessarv: N/A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analvst : PAMELA MS Date of Reoort 7-;23 >'9
Instrument : 1 Analyst's Initials fGN
Supervisor's Initials
� 1ppoa-
zzaxzxeesaeassazazzzazzaazaszzazzzzaaxaaxzsssxzaasxaaszeszxazzzazzxzzzzeazaxzaszezxaazz__ ___zs_ zz
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
REGULATED COMPOUNDS
EPA
Code # Comoound Name MCL(ua/1) # Amount (ua/1) Comoliance
------- ----------------------• ------ ------------- -----------
2976 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 0.0 YES
2977 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 7 0.0 YES
29A1 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 290 0.0 yrr,
2982 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 0.0 YES
2990 BENZENE 5 0.0 YES
2900 1,2-DICHLORDETHANE 5 0.0 YES
2984 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5 0.0 YES
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 0.0 YES
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 uo/1 indicates that the true concentration is less than
the detection limit of the method (0.5 uo/1 for all compounds).
(pane 1 of 3)
Lab Number : 5401286
Data File : )1G051::D2
Results of Analusis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Monitoring Required
EPA Code # Compound Name *Amount (uo/1)
---------- ----------------------------- -------------
2210 CHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2214 BROMOMETHANE 0.0
2216 CHLOROETHANE 0.0
2964 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 0.0
2979 T-1,2,-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2978 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2416 2.2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2390 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2941 CHLOROFORM (THM) 0.0
2410 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 0.0
2983 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2408 DIBROMOMETHANE 0.0
2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2991 TOLUENE 0.0
2985 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2987 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2412 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2944 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE (THMI 0.0
2989 CHLOR08ENZENE 0.0
2986 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2992 ETHYL BENZENE 0.0
2995 M/P-XYLENE 0.0
2997 O-XYLENE 0.0
2996 STYRENE 0.0
2942 BROMOFORM (THM) 0.0
2993 BROMOBENZENE 0.0
2414 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2988 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2965 O-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2966 P-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2967 M-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2968 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
}Note: An Amount of 0.0 uo/I indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection
limit of the method (0.5 ug/I for all compounds),
Lab Number : 5401286
Data File : )16051::D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unrequlated Compounds
Discretionary
EPA Code f Comnound Name *Amount (ug/l)
----------- ------------------------ ------------
2218 TRICHLORDFLUOROMETHANE 0.0
2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2994 ISOPROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2998 N-PROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2424 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2426 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2419 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2428 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2030 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 0.0
2422 N-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2370 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBEN2ENE 0.0
2248 NAPHTHALENE 0.0
2246 HEYACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.0
2420 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 uq/I indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit
of the method (0.5 ug/l for all compounds).
(oaoe 3 of 3)
' State of Washington
ncrl Department of Social and Health Services
F'•'• ' '' Division of Health
Public Health Laboratories
1610 N.E. 150th St., Seattle, WA 99155
(206)361-2898
z aaacesazaaacaxaaaazcccaaasaa_s_aaz_aczaevsa_aCazszaac_cazaaczxccszzxc__aazsaza_saassaz:xazs:sacaaae
Lab Number : 5401288 Customer CITY OF KENT/TIM HEYDON
Date collected : 6-24-89 Address 220 4TH AVE. 50.
Date Received : 6-26-89 City : KENT
Date Tested : 7106189 11:26 State, Zip : WA 99032
Data File : >1GO6E::D2 County : KING
Miscellaneous Sample Information : 5401288
System ID Number : 381501 System Name : CITY OF KENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Composited Samples
DENS Source Number : S07
Source Name : SODS CREEK WELL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Composited Samples
Number of Sources Used in Composite : N/A
DSHS Source is Composited : N/A
Analysis of Individual Sources Necessary: N/A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyst : PAMELA MS Date of Report 8�t
Instrument : 1 Analyst's Initials : P6:rj/r
Suneryisor's Initials : �
z aaavxscsexvxavazsaasxa¢azsaave_szxevzzccc:sz¢avv¢ccsavzcavxxazacazazvscxzsvcsxc¢saacssxxczc� � /OV�
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
REGULATED COMPOUNDS
EPA
Code # Compound Name MCL(uq/1) * Amount (ug/1) Compliance
------- ---------------------- --------- ------------- -----------
2976 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 0.0 YES
2977 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 7 0.0 YES
2981 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE 200 0.0 YES
2902 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 0.0 YES
2990 BENZENE 5 0.0 YES
2900 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE 5 0.0 YES
2984 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5 0.0 YES
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 0.0 YES
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 uq/1 indicates that the true concentration is less than
the detection limit of the method (0.5 ug/I for all compounds).
(pane 1 of 3)
Lab Number : 5401289
Data File : )1606E::D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unrequlated Compounds
Monitorinq Required
EPA Code f Compound Name "Amount (ug/l).
---------- ----------------------------- -------------
2210 CHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2214 BROMOMETHANE 0.0
2216 CHLOROETHANE 0.0
2964 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 0.0
2979 T-1,2,-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2978 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2416 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2380 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2941 CHLOROFORM (THM) 0.0
2410 1,1-OICHLOROPROPEHE 0.0
2983 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2408 DIBROMOMETHANE 0.0
2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2991 TOLUENE 0.0
2985 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2987 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2412 1,3-DICHLOROPROPAHE 0.0
2944 CHLORODIBROMOMETHAHE (THM) 0.0
2989 CHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2996 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2992 ETHYL BENZENE 0.0
2995 M/P-XYLENE 0.0
2997 O-XYLENE 0.0
2996 STYRENE 0.0
2942 BROMOFORM (THM) 0.0
2993 BROMOBENZENE 0.0
2414 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2989 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2965 0-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2966 P-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2967 M-DICHLDROBENZENE 0.0
2968 O-DICHLOROBENZENE U.0
*Note,. An Amount of 0.0 ug/I indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection
limit of the method (0.5 ug/I for all compounds).
Lab Number : 5401289
Data File : >1G06E::02
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Discretionary
EPA Code # Compound Name *Amount (ug/l)
----------- ------------------------ ------------
2210 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 0.0
2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2994 ISOPROPYLSENZENE 0.0
2998 N-PROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2424 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLSENZENE 0.0
2426 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2418 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
242E SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2030 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 0.0
2422 N-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2378 11214-TRICHLBROBENZENE 0.0
2248 NAPHTHALENE 0.0
2246 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.0
2420 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZEHE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 uq/1 indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit
of the method (0.5 uq/l for all compounds).
(page 3 of 3)
State of Washington
i1I .tr ,tErlj Department of Social and Health Services
Division of Health
Public Health Laboratories
1610 N.E. 150th St., Seattle. WA 90155
(206)361-2898
a saxxaaaaaaaaxaaeaavzxexaaaaassczxacxeazvzzzaxxxxxxszxzcxzcxxxscxaxcazaxaxassxsaszacsazzxaxczaeasasa
Lab Number : 5401289 Customer : CITY OF KENT/TIM HEYDON
Date collected : 6-26-89 Address : 220 4TH AVE. SO.
Date Received : 6-26-09 City : KENT
Date Tested : 7/06/89 12:06 State, Zip : WA 98032
Data File : )1G06F::D2 Countv : KING
Miscellaneous Sample Information : 5401289
System ID Number : 381501 System Name : CITY OF KENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Comoosited Samples
DSHS Source Number : S09
Source Name : ARMSTRONG SPRINGS Al
7---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comoosited Samples
Number of Sources Used in Composite : N/A
DSHS Source #'s Composited : N/A
Analvsis of Individual Sources Necessary: N/A
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyst PAMELA MS Date of Report
Instrument 1 Analyst's Initials
Supervisor's Initials V
zxc_sczcxsazzzxzsczxzxzzasxzxseezccszszcex_vaeaazxxsaasxazzxe_aczzzsaxzzaac_z czx_sxxzsae___cczaxx ���
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
REGULATED COMPOUNDS
EPA
Code f Compound Name MCL(uq/1) * Amount (ua/1) Compliance
------- ---------------------- --------- ------------- -----------
2976 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 0.0 YES
2977 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 7 0.0 YES
2981 1 1;1-TRlrNIf1P0FTHANE 200 0.0 YES
2982 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 0.0 YES
2990 BENZENE 5 0.0 YES
2980 1,2-DICHLORDETHANE 5 0.0 YES
2994 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5 0.0 YES
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 0.0 YES
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 uo/I indicates that the true concentration is less than
the detection limit of the method (0.5 ug/I for all compounds).
(page 1 of 3)
Lab Number : 5401289
Data File : >1G06F::02
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unrequlated Compounds
Monitorinq Required
EPA Code t Compound Name }Amount (ug/1)
---------- ----------------------------- -------------
2210 CHLOROMETHAHE 0.0
2214 BROMOMETHANE 0.0
2216 CHLOROETHANE 0.0
2964 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 0.0
2979 T-1,2,-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2979 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2416 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2380 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2941 CHLOROFORM (THM) 0.0
2410 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 0.0
2993 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2408 DIBROMOMETHANE 0.0
2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2991 TOLUENE 0.0
2985 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2902 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2412 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2944 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2989 CHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2906 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2992 ETHYL BENZENE 0.0
2995 M/P-XYLENE 0.0
2992 0-XYLENE 0.0
2996 STYRENE 0.0
2942 BROMOFORM (THM) 0.0
2993 BROMOBENZENE 0.0
2414 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2989 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2965 0-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2966 P-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2967 M-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2968 0-DICHLOROBENZENE 9.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/I indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection
limit of the method (0.5 ug/1 for all compounds).
Lab Number : 5401289
Data File : )1606F::02
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Discretionary
EPA Code # Compound Name *Amount (uq/t)
----------- ------------------------ ------------
2218 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 0.0
2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2994 ISOPROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2990 N-PROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2424 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2426 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2410 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBEHZENE 0.0
2428 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2030 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 0.0
2422 N-BUTYLBEHZENE 0.0
2378 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2248 NAPHTHALENE 0.0
2246 HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.0
2420 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/l indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit
of the method (0.5 ug/1 for all compounds).
(page 3 of 3)
State of Washington
,% Department of Social and Health Services
Division of Health
Public Health Laboratories
1610 N.E. 150th St., Seattle, WA 98155
(206)361-2898
cacesa_zzaaa:zaxsasxaaxaacz-cascvzxazzgaga_csasaaxsaxz__as_z_zzcaazavaa_a__s_-axxxvzas__-zaxaaasazza
Lab Number : 5401290 Customer : CITY OF KENT/TiM HEYDON
Date collected : 6-26-89 Address : 220 4TH AVE. SO.
Date Received : 6-26-99 City : KENT
Date Tested : 7/06/89 12:47 State, Zip : WA 90032
Data File : )IGO6G::02 County : KING
Miscellaneous Sample Information 5401290
System ID Number : 381501 System Name : CITY OF KENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Composited Samples
DSHS Source Number : S09
Source Name ARMSTRONG SPRINGS A2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Composited Samples
Number of Sources Used in Composite : N/A
DSHS Source #'s Composited : N/A
Analysis of Individual Sources Necessary: N/A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyst : PAMELA MS Data of Report
Instrument : 1 Analyst's Initials : PfTN
Supervisor's Initials :
ecsezccascczccczcczsacxcxzcvsvczcaoasxzzxsaczvzzaaaaacacxaszzzsczsczzssaavzxs caazzcczzsza___cccca � ��� .
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
REGULATED COMPOUNDS
EPA
Code 3 Compound Name MCL(ug/l) * Amount (ug/1) Compliance
------- ---------------------- --------- ------------- -----------
2976 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 0.0 YES
2977 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 7 0.0 YES
2981 l,l,l-TRICHLOROETHANE 200 n n YFS
2992 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 0.0 YES
2990 BENZENE 5 0.0 YES
2980 1,2-DICHLORDETHANE 5 0.0 YES
2904 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5 0.0 YES
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 0.0 YES
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 un/I indicates that the true concentration is less than
the detection limit of the method (0.5 ug/l for all compounds).
(page 1 of 3)
Lab Number : 5401290
Data File : )1G06G::D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Monitorinq Required
EPA Code t Compound Name ;Amount (ua/1)
---------- ----------------------------- -------------
2210 CHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2214 BROMOMETHANE 0.0
2216 CHLOROETHANE 0.0
2964 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 0.0
2979 T-1.2,-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2978 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2416 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2390 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLEHE 0.0
2941 CHLOROFORM (THM) 0.0
2410 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 0.0
2903 1,2-DICHLBROPROPANE 0.0
240E DIBROMOMETHANE 0.0
2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2991 TOLUENE 0.0
2985 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2997 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2412 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2944 CHLDRODiBROMOMETHAHE (THM) 0.0
2909 CHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2986 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2992 ETHYL BENZENE 0.0
2995 M/P-XYLENE 0.0
2997 O-XYLENE 0.0
2996 STYRENE 0.0
2942 BROMOFORM (THM) 0.0
2993 BROMOBENZENE 0.0
2414 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2908 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2965 0-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2966 P-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2967 M-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2968 0-DICHLORDBENZENE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/I indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection
limit of the method (0.5 ug/l for all compounds).
Lab Number : 5401290
Data file : >1G06G::D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unregulated C0000unds
Discretionary
EPA Code i Compound Name 'Amount (uq/1)
----------- ------------------------ ------------
2218 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHAHE 0.0
2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2994 ISOPROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2998 N-PROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2424 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2426 TERT-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2418 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2428 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2030 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 0.0
2422 H-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2378 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2248 NAPHTHALENE 0.0
2246 HE%ACHLOROBUTADIENE 0.0
2420 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
"Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/l indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit
of the method (0.5 ug/I for all compounds).
(page 3 of 3)
State of Washinoton
Department of Social and Health Services
Division of Health
Public Health Laboratories
1610 N.E. 150th St., Seattle, WA 99155
(206)361-2898
c_sasssa-ssazz_exss_vsacsc_ssssszsszc-_sxss_ssazassszscvca_vas_csas-ssccxs-sssas-sec_-s_ccac_aecc_ss
Lab Number : 5401291 Customer CITY OF KENT/TIM HEYDON
Date collected : 6-26-89 Address 220 4TH AUE. SO.
Date Received : 6-26-89 City : KENT
Date Tested : 7/06/89 15:09 State, Zip : WA 98032
Data File : >1G061::02 County : KING
Miscellaneous Sample Information : 5401291
System ID Number : 391501 System Name : CITY OF KENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Non-Comoosited Samples
DSHS Source Number : S10
Source Name : 212 STREET WELL
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Composited Samples
Number of Sources Used in Composite N/A
DSHS Source I's Composited : N/A
Analysis of Individual Sources Necessary: N/A
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyst : PAMELA MS Date of Report : -V
Instrument : 1 Analyst's Initials
Supervisor's Initials
_vvsc_sssaczssascsyssaaz_czsazscczssxe_cssaaascxcsxc_e:sa_sc__sv---acc_s-ss-vzzzxa-vssz---����
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
REGULATED COMPOUNDS
EPA
Code 3 Compound Name MCL(ug/I) * Amount (ug/I) Compliance
------- ---------------------- --------- ------------- -----------
2976 VINYL CHLORIDE 2 0.0 YES
2977 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE 7 0.0 YES
2991 1) ;1-Tp1rH.I,noncT14gHE 2np n,0 YES
2982 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 5 9.0 YES
2990 BENZENE 5 0.0 YES
2990 1,2-DiCHLOROETHANE 5 0.0 YES
2994 TRICHLOROETHYLENE 5 0.0 YES
2969 P-DICHLOROBENZENE 75 0.0 YES
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/I indicates that the true concentration is less than
the detection limit of the method (0.5 ug/I for all compounds).
(page 1 of 3)
Lab Number : 5401291
Data File : )1G061::D2
Results of Analvsis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unrequlated Compounds
Monitoring Required
EPA Code # Compound Name *Amount (ug/1)
-------- ----------------------------- -------------
2210 CHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2214 BROMOMETHANE 0.0
2216 CHLOROETHANE 0.0
2964 METHYLENE CHLORIDE 0.0
2979 T-1,2,-DICHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2978 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2416 2,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2300 CIS-1,2-DICHLOROETHYLENE 6.0
2941 CHLOROFORM (THM) 0.0
2410 1,1-DICHLOROPROPENE 0.0
2983 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2408 DIBROMOMETHANE 0.0
2943 BROMODICHLOROMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2991 TOLUENE 0.0
2985 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE 0.0
2987 TETRACHLOROETHYLENE 0.0
2412 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2944 CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE (THM) 0.0
2989 CHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2996 1,1,1,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2992 ETHYL BENZENE 0.0
2995 M/P-XYLENE 0.0
2997 0-XYLENE 0.0
2996 STYRENE 0.0
2942 BROMOFORM (THM) 0.0
2993 BROMOBENZENE 0.0
2414 1,2,3-TRICHLOROPROPANE 0.0
2988 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE 0.0
2965 0-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2966 P-CHLOROTOLUENE 0.0
2967 M-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
2968 O-DICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/1 indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection
limit of the method (0.5 ug/I for all compounds).
Lab Number : 5401291
Data File : )1G061::D2
Results of Analysis by EPA Method 524
(continued)
Unregulated Compounds
Discretionary
EPA Code # Compound Name ;Amount (ug/1)
----------- ------------------------ ------------
2219 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE 0.0
2430 BROMOCHLOROMETHANE 0.0
2994 ISOPROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2998 N-PROPYLBENZENE 0.0
2424 1,3,5-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2426 TERT-BUTYLBEHZENE 0.0
2418 1,2,4-TRIMETHYLBENZENE 0.0
2429 SEC-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2630 P-ISOPROPYLTOLUENE 0.0
2422 H-BUTYLBENZENE 0.0
2378 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
224E NAPHTHALENE 0.0
2246 HEXACHLOROBUTAD I ENE 0.0
2420 1,2,3-TRICHLOROBENZENE 0.0
*Note: An Amount of 0.0 ug/I indicates that the true
concentration is less than the detection limit
of the method (0.5 ug/l for all compounds).
(page 3 of 3)
l/VaEer �LJi�Ericcf l/o. 75, n� C.11ty
Telephone 824-0375 P.O. Box 3867, Midway Station Office: 23828 30th Ave. So.
KENT, WASHINGTON 98032-3867
C1TY OF KENT
FED 1 3 1990
February 8, 1990 ENGtNEF.R!NG nF?�.
Mr. Don Wickstrom
Director of Public Works
City of Kent
220 Fourth Avenue S.
Kent, WA 98032-5895
Re: Water System Plan - City of Kent
Dear Don:
We have reviewed your draft water system plan dated
12/89 and have the following comments:
Section 15 _ Agreement w/neighboring purveyors
You identify our 1982 agreement. As you know, that
agreement was revised in 1985 , and I have attached a
copy of that agreement for your reference.
As you probably know, two of our Board members have
changed since that agreement was executed. The
term of that agreement was to January 1, 1990 and
indefinitely thereafter on an annual basis .
If you feel a need to talk about a renegotiation of
this agreement, other than the year-to-year clause as
it exists, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
DU,AANE HUSKEY, P.E.
Manager
Engineering/Operations
DH:w
cc• Peggy Bosley
KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 75
RESOLUTION NO. 85-6-19 D
A RESOLUTION APPROVING WATER DISTRICT
NO. 75 AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE WATER SERVICE
TO CITY OF KENT
RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of Water District No. 75 that the
Commissioners hereby approve Water District No. 75 Agreement to provide water
service to the City of Kent.
FURTHER RESOLVED that the President and Secretary are authorized to sign said
agreement on behalf of the District.
PASSED by the Board of Commissioners this 19tiy',day of June,. 1985.
WATER DISTRICT NO. 75
AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE WATER SERVICE
TO CITY OF KENT
THIS AGREEMENT made this 19th day of June, 1985, between King County Water
District No. 75, (Water District No. 75), King County, and The City of Kent (Kent):
WHEREAS, Water District No. 75 and Kent are municipal corporations organized
under the laws of the State of Washington; and
WHEREAS, the State Department of Social and Health Service recommends Water
Service Agreements between adjacent water utilities; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan of Water District No. 75 anticipates such
needs; and
WHEREAS, the Rules and Regulations of the Water District set forth conditions
for providing water service; and
WHEREAS, the rate structure of Water District No. 75 specifies the cost of
- providing- water for certain classes of users;
NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:
1. Definitions
a) Continuous Service: Two (2) utilities connected by an unlocked
operating meter for a term of more than one year.
b) Emergency Service: Two (2) utilities connected by a locked meter with
service provided at the rquest of one or the other recipient for a
sudden unplanned event or set of circumstances demanding immediate
action to prevent serious losses to personnel and/or property.
c) Other: Shall be miscellaneous water use; not defined.
2. Scope of Service
Water District No. 75 will provide the continuous service, as defined above,
to the City of Kent.
-1-
• 1
Location of meter will be: S. 242nd St. do Military Rd. S.
Size and type of meter will be: 8" Water Specialities, Propeller
Meter Number or identification: 781230
Meter will be owned by: Water District No. 75
Meter will be maintained and read by: Water District No. 75
Meter will be installed and paid for by: Water District No. 75
Hydraulic gradient at meter will be: (max.) 560 W D #75 HW L
(max.) 529 Kent HW L
Estimated available flow will be: (max.) 1,000 GPM
(min.) 200 GPM
Estimated annual consumption will be: (max.) 525 MG
(min.) 105 MG
Meter will be normally unlocked.
3. Cost of Water
Charges for water will be based upon the Water District No. 75 current rates
as amended from time to time hereafter. The applicable rate for service to
Kent will be wholesale.
The size of meter for billing purposes will be determined by historical annual
demand. This meter size is initially estimated to be . 8 inches in diameter.
This hypothetical meter, size will be verified annually and appropriate credits
or adjustments will be made each year.
A copy of the current Water District No. 75 rate schedule is attached
hereto, and made a part hereof.
4. City of Seattle Demand Charge
In the event water usage through the interties causes either municipality to
incur a City of Seattle demand charge, as established by City of Seattle
Ordinance No. 109398, or in the event that it causes an increase in the City
of Seattle demand charge that one of the municipalities must pay, then in
that event, the parties shall negotiate additional compensation for the water
used. The additional compensation shall be as the two municipalities shall
agree as reasonable under the circumstances.
5. Idemnification
Kent agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Water District No. 75 from and
against all claims, demands and causes of action of any kind or character,
including the cost of defense thereof, from any claim on account of personal
injuries, death or damage to personal property arising out of this agreement;
except such claims as are finally determined to be the result of the sole
negligence of Water District No. 75.
Furthermore, it is understood and agreed that Water District No. 75 makes no
warranties or assurances as to Water availability, pressure or volume at any
given time. It is understood that if Water District No. 75's water servicr
to the interconnection point is temporarily interrupted for repair; in all.
emergency; or for any other reason not within the control of the Water
-2-
, 1 %
f
District; it is not obliged to provide an alternative source of supply. Water
District No. 75 does, however, warrant that it will not, except for reasons
such as the foregoing, interrupt the water supply to the interconnection.
6. Term
This Agreement, except for the water rate, shall extend to January 1, 1990,
and shall continue indefinitely on an annual basis thereafter unless either of
the Parties notifies the other of its intention not to continue this agreement
by giving ninety days (90) written notice prior to the end of the first term
of this agreement or any extended term thereof.
7. Miscellaneous Conditions
a. Demand monitoring required. Install P.R.V.
b. In the event the City of Kent determines to construct a new interties
to the Water District No. 75 utility system, in the area of S. 240th and
35th Ave. S., the Water District agrees to allow such connection to
abandon the existing interties at S. 242nd St. and Military Rd. S., and
relocate its water meter to the location of the new interties. The new
intertie shall be constructed at the sole cost and is the sole
responsibility of the City.
WATER DISTRICT NO. 75, THE CITY OF KENT
KING CODUY
President of the Board of
Water Commissioners
Bye o-� s�] �r�-� By:
Sect tary of the Board ofi`
Water Commissioners
-3-
r
v P.O. Box 58039 Renton, Washington 9805:_,)39
10828 S.E. 176th (206) 255-2524
WC�4��
CITY OF FENT
January 22, 1990 JAN 2 4 1990
ENGINEERING DEPT
City of Kent
220 4th Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98032-5895
Attn: Don E. Wickstrom, P.E.
Re: Review of City of Kent Draft Water Comprehensive
Plan, 1988
Dear Mr. Wickstrom,
As you requested, we have reviewed the Comprehensive Water
Plan for the City of Kent.
We have noted on the map some areas where the District boundary
location should be corrected and properly depicted. We have
included an additional copy of the map for you to forward to the
City.
Both Soos Creek Water and Sewer District and the City of Kent
have indicated in their comprehensive plans proposed interties
between the two systems. To my knowledge, the negotiations for
this provision have never been carried out.
It might be appropriate that they mention in Chapter XVI the
existence of each of the adjacent purveyors and the comprehen-
sive plans for each.
Very ly yours,
R ert L. n
District Manager
RL/tf
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 , 199f
�- Category Consent Calendar
- $ FIRE RESOURCE MUTUAL AID MASTER AGREEMENT ,,
Approval of the Fire Resource Mutual Aid
Master Agreement. Until now, our automatic and mutual aid agree-
ments with other fire agencies could only be extended within
King County by working jointly with the King County Offices of
Emergency Services and King County Fire Chiefs. 1t is now possi-
ble through RCW 38. 52 to enter into an agreement with Pierce
County. Any emergency aid sent would be limited by the type of
calls/assistance requested for and the Fire Chief would retain
final authority on whether or not to send units based on our
community's needs.
While there is a potential for overtime costsywe believe that
the overall impact would be minimized by the number of requests.
Further;the benefits to this community would far outweigh any
costs or risks. It is anticipated that in the long-term, there
would be a balance of give and take that would satisfy the
demand of localized large incidences.
3 . EXHIBITS: Exe\tive summa
4. RECOMMENDED BYrm An to Fire Chief DirectrServices• Kin t F' a Chief; Kincr County Division of
Emergency Services• n Public safety Committee
(Committee, Staff, aminer, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL P O L IMPACT: NO X (per Financel YES
FISCAL PERSONNEL N E: R commended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE RE UI D: Dete fined by number of times and units
recruested in a en vear. S me years there will be no requests.
We estimate thaV we mav send a or two units two or three
times a year on an avers a for '' "ess than five hours. Costs to
be processed t rou h de artment ' vertime bud et. Given hicfh
risk of hazards in the Kent Vallix. we anticipate these costs
would be mor than offset by assistance we would receive in the
event of a r e localized incident:,
SOURCE OFFONDS:
7. CITY COUN IL ACTION:
Council4mber moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSS N•
ACTION:
{ Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
r-
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DECEMBER 18, 1990
TO: COUNCIL PRESIDENT JUDY WOODS, COUNCILMEMBERS JON JOHNSON,
JIM WHITE, PAUL MANN, CHRISTI HOUSER, STEVE DOWELL AND
LEONA ORR
FROM: , NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF I)Iz a
SUBJECT: FIRE RESOURCE MUTUAL AID MASTER AGREEMENT
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction/Background: Delivering Fire Service within King
County has always depended on neighbors ' willingness to help each
other during large emergencies. This is not only a cost effective
and efficient method of utilizing resources, but it is critical
when additional resources are needed quickly to protect life and
property. Through automatic and mutual aid agreements with our
immediate neighbors and within King County, we have found that in
the long term, the give and take of help has always balanced out.
There is currently proposed, in conjunction with the King County
Office of Emergency Services, a mutual aid agreement that would
allow King County Fire Agencies (through RCW 38 . 52) to give and
receive emergency aid with fire agencies in Pierce County. This
exchange of resources would only take place in large incidents, if
all of their regional and local resources had been utilized to the
fullest degree possible. An emergency mission number would be
issued through King County Office of Emergency Services. This
would cover liability under State Labor and Industries. However,
each agency would still remain responsible for payment of salaries,
insurance on apparatus, fueling, etc. There would also be
potential overtime costs when we send a unit but we would not pay
for salaries of anyone that came to our assistance. We envision
that going out of county might happen a couple times a year. In
many cases, we may not go during the year at all. While there are
not exact ways to predict how many times a year we might go, we
would always have the option not to send units. In a case where we
were experiencing a large incident, or in the case of a generalized
disaster, we would keep resources at a level that would first serve
our community needs. This type of mutual aid would be mostly used
for localized large incidents.
Page 1
While there is the potential to incur some overtime costs (based on
actual number of calls for aid) and some risks, the benefit far
outweighs any costs, given our risks in the valley for large
incidents. Further, I would retain the option to use discretion in
determining whether or not to send units based on the specifics of
our situation.
Recommended Action: That the Fire Chief be authorized to sign the
Fire Resource Mutual Aid Master Agreement through the King County
Fire Chiefs and King County Office of Emergency Services.
Significance: For minimal risks and costs, we can greatly enhance
our available resources for a localized large incident or disaster.
Budget/Economic Impact: There may be additional overtime costs
which would be impacted by the number of units sent, and duration
of time they were sent for. Other risks would be covered through
our current coverage on apparatus or through Labor and Industries
on our personnel given a mission number. It is anticipated that
for our jurisdiction, we might be impacted on average perhaps a
couple times a year. In all cases, we would use discretion and
maintain final control based on our situation and the type of
request.
Alternatives: Do not sign the agreement which most other agencies
have signed, and forego the use of additional resources that could
be available to assist us in our high hazard risks in this
community.
kj
'U�/
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 . 1991
Category Consent Calendar
I..
WEST HILL FIRE STATION AND POLICE SUBSTATION
�,-2�"'3IIIpHKARYrST�iT EN4:' /�i Contract. signed with John Korsmo
Construction on June 1, 1989. After a period of time to correct
punch list items, the Fire Department has accepted the project
as 100 percent complete. By accepting this item on .the consent
calendar, the Council will be accepting the project complete as
of the date that we have written release by all lien holders of
their liens. After those lien requirements are met, the Fire
Department is authorized to release retainage upon receipt of
appropriate documentation from the Department of Revenue as wellckk
the Department of Labor and Industry.
3 . EXHIBITS: Executive summary
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Administration. Public Safety Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE RE UIRED: Final payment has been made to the
contractor. Retainage of approximately $51 673 27 being held
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L
bd
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY f'jj Y J 799Q
DECEMBER 18, 1990 C;
1
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS WHITE, DOWELL, JOHNSON, HOUSER,
MANN, ORR
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF THE WEST HILL FIRE STATION AND
POLICE SUBSTATION
---------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
Contract for construction was signed with John Korsmo
Construction of Tacoma on the 1st of June, 1989. The original
contract sum was $1, 062 , 461. 93 including tax.
The Fire and Police Departments took occupancy in March of 1990.
Upon receipt of proper notification that all liens have been
satisfied, the Fire Department is recommending processing the
paperwork to notify the Department of Labor and Industries and
Department of revenue that work has been completed. Upon receipt
of the necessary certificates, we will then be able to release
retainage to the Contractor.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council accept this project as complete, subject to the written
release of liens by the lien holders, and authorize the release
of retainage upon receipt of appropriate documentation from the
Departments of Revenue and Labor and Industries as well as the
lien release documentation.
SIGNIFICANCE
This is the final phase for the west hill fire station and police
substation and with this successful completion allows the Fire
Department to maintain the remaining projects in a timely
fashion.
korexesu.wpf
Executive Summary to the Mayor and City Council
December 18, 1990
Page 2
BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT
This project has been budgeted through the bond levy with no
impact on the general operating budget of the department.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES
None
tcn
korexesu.wpf
Kent City Council Meeting
Date December 18 , 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: Approval for the completion of construction on
the west hill fire station and police substation.
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Contract signed with John Korsmo
Construction on June 1, 1989 . After a period of time to
correct punch list items, the Fire Department has accepted
the project as 100% complete. By accepting this item on the
consent calender, the Council will be accepting the project
complete as of the date that we have written release by all
lien holders of their liens. After those lien requirements
are met, the Fire Department is authorized to release
retainage upon the receipt of appropriate documentation from
the Department of Revenue as well as the Department of Labor
and Industries.
3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Administration Public Safety
Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO x YES _
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended _
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Final payment has been made to the
contractor. Retainage of approximately $51 673 . 27 being
held.
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
korexesu.wpf
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 . 1991
Category Consent Calendar
,:X..''T':6UBJZQT-: J.--40 S LETION or- WEST HILL SITE
2y Acceptu as complete Athe land preparation
for the West Hil]AComplex. The Public Safety Committee and the
Fire Chief ts recommender that the City Council accept this
phase of the project as 100 percent complete and authorize
processing the paperwork to notify the Department of Labor and
Industry as well as the Department of Revenue that the work has
been completed. Upon receipt of the necessary certificate, -we
will tben be ablembw releasedr6Gaimage to the contractor.
fat
t 9
3 . EXHIBITS: Executive summary and memorandum
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Administration, Engineering Dept.
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCALLPERaQNNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: Final payment has been made to the
contractor. Retainage of approximately $11,956. 59 being held.
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3M
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DECEMBER 18 , 1990
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS,
COUNCILMEMBERS WHITE, DOWELL, JOHNSON,
HOUSER, MANN, ORR ��
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF gj,6 ey-
SUBJECT: WEST HILL COMPLETED LAND PREPARATION
---------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
Land preparation for the west hill complex commenced in
September, 1988 . This is the site of the fire station and police
office facility.
On April 11, 1989 the Fire Department received a memorandum from
Randy Brake, Engineering Department stating that "the punchlist
items have been completed and on March 15, 1989 the Street User
Permit was released as part of the final inspection" .
Although the attached memorandum represented approval from the
Engineering Department, there were several punchlist items left
unattended until the actual completion of the building
construction.
The Fire Department has made final payment to Santana Trucking
and Excavating, Inc. and is recommending processing the paperwork
to notify the Department of Labor and Industries as well as the
Department of Revenue that the work has been completed. Upon
receipt of the necessary certificates, we will then be able to
release retainage to the contractor.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Council accept this phase of the project as complete and
authorize the release of the retainage upon receipt of
appropriate documentation from the Departments of Labor and
Industries and Revenue.
whexesum.wpf
Executive Summary to Mayor Kelleher and Councilmembers
December 18, 1990
Page 2
SIGNIFICANCE
The contractor has met the requirements that make this part of
the project eligible for processing the retainage.
BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT
This project has been budgeted through the bond levy with no
impact on the general operating budget of the department.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES
None
tcn
whexesum.wpf
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
April 11, 1989
TO: Chief Bond
FROM: Randy Brake
RE: Status of Construction Inspection for
West Hill Fire Station Utility Work
As per my discussion with Gene Bridge regarding the above
referenced project, the punchlist items have been completed and
on March 15, 1989 the Street Use Permit was released as part of
the final inspection.
c
APR 1 1 19A9
Kent City Council Meeting
Date December 18 , 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: Completion of land preparation on the west hill
site.
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance as complete, the land
preparation for the west hill complex. The Public Safety
Committee and the Fire Chief is recommending that the City
Council accept this phase of the project as look complete
and authorize processing the paperwork to notify the
Department of Labor and Industries as well as the Department
of Revenue that the work has been completed. Upon receipt
of the necessary certificates, we will then be able to
release retainage to the contractor.
3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary, Memorandum
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Administration Engineering Dept.
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO x YES _
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Final payment has been made to the
contractor. Retainage of approximately $11 956. 59 being
held.
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
whexesum.wpf
r�
Kent City Council Meeting
V Date January 2 . 1991
Category Consent Calendar
-- INTERLOCAL COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
-2: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the
Interlocal Cooperative Agreement with King County for use of
conservation future funds. This executed agreement is required
for Kent to be eligible for grant awards.
3 . EXHIBITS: Interlocal Agreement
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Department and City Attorney's Office
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL' NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE UIRED: $ N/A
SOURCE OF FUN S•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3N
3 /V
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY
AND THE CITY OF Kent
SUBURBAN CITY OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROJECTS
THIS INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT is entered into
between the CITY OF Kent ("City") and KING
COUNTY ("County") .
Article I. Recitals
On September 21, 1989, the King County Council passed
Ordinance 9128, which established a Conservation Futures Levy
Fund and appropriated a total of $2 ,900, 000 in conservation
futures levy proceeds to King County ($11100,000) , the City of
Seattle ($1, 100,000) and suburban cities ($700, 000) .
Ordinance 9128 also established conditions for use of the
Fund, including conditions covering allowable projects, costs
and expenses.
The Open Space Citizens Advisory Committee has recommended
an initial and a secondary allocation of Conservation Futures
funds from the Suburban City Open Space Acquisition Project
following notification to the suburban cities that funds were
available, provision of an opportunity for the suburban cities
to respond and receipt by the committee of requests for
funding, all pursuant to Ordinance 8867.
The King County Council by Motion 7742 has approved the
initial allocation and by Motion .8120 the secondary allocation
of 1989 Conservation Futures funds, and authorized the King
County Executive to enter into interlocal cooperation
agreements with the suburban cities in order to initiate the
f\:int1coop.agt/12-14-90 1
approved projects
Pursuant to King County Ordinance 9128, King County Motion
7742, Washington Statute Chapter 84. 34 RCW and Washington
Statute Chapter 39. 34, the parties agree to follows:
Article II. Definitions
1. Open Space
The term "open space" or "open space land" means: a)
any land area so designated by an official comprehensive land
use plan adopted by any city or county and zoned accordingly;
or b) any land area, the preservation of which in its present
use would: 1) conserve and enhance natural or scenic
resources; or 2) protect streams or water supply; or 3) promote
conservation of soils, wetlands, beaches or tidal marshes; or
4) enhance the value to the public of abutting or neighboring
parks, forests, wildlife reserves, natural reservations or
sanctuaries or other open space; or 5) enhance recreational
activities; or 6) preserve historic sites, or 7) retain in its
natural state tracts of land of not less than five acres
situated in an urban area and open to public use on such
conditions as may be reasonably required by the legislative
body granting the open space classification.
2. Project
The term "Project" means specific projects which meet
open space criteria as described in King County Ordinance 8867,
section 1, and RCW 84.34.020 and which are attached to and
incorporated by reference . in King County Ordinance 9071 or
added to the list of approved projects by the County.
3 . Conservation Futures
The term "conservation futures" means developmental
rights which may be acquired by purchase, gift, grant, bequest,
devise, lease, or otherwise, except by eminent domain, and.may
consist of fee simple or any lesser interest, development
right, easement, covenant, or other contractual right necessary
to protect, preserve, maintain, improve restore, limit future
use of, or otherwise conserve open space land, all . in
accordance with the provisions of Washington Statute Chapter
84. 34 RCW and King County Ordinance 8867.
Article III. Purpose of the Agreement
The purpose of this agreement is to create a cooperative
arrangement between the City and the County relating to the
Projects and to define the terms and conditions governing both
parties' obligations created by this agreement.
Article IV. Term of Agreement
This agreement shall be and continue in full force and
effect and binding upon. the parties hereto upon execution of
the agreement by both parties. The terms of the agreement
shall be indefinite. The agreement will be terminated if the
City is unable or unwilling: 1) to expend the funds provided
through this agreement; 2) to satisfy the matching requirements
contained in this agreement; and- 3) upon reimbursement by the
City to the County of all unexpended funds provided by the
County pursuant to this agreement in the manner and amounts
described below.
f\:int1coop.agt/12-14-90 3
Article. V. Conditions of Agreement
Section 5. 1 - Project Description. Funds available pursuant
to this agreement may be used only. for Projects listed in
Attachment A, which is incorporated herein by reference, or
such substituted Projects as may be approved by the County as
set forth below. All County funded Projects must meet open
space criteria as described in King County Ordinance 8867,
Section 1, and Washington Statute Chapter 84. 34. 020 RCW.
Section 5. 2 - Use of Funds. Funds provided to the City
pursuant to this agreement as well as funds provided by the
City as match pursuant to this agreement may be used only for
expenses related to property acquisition. Those expenses
include appraisals, title searches, negotiations,
administrative overhead, and the cost of.actual acquisition or
purchase options, all in accordance with the provisions of
Section 3 of Ordinance 9128. Funds utilized pursuant to this
agreement may not be used to purchase land obtained through the
exercise of eminent domain.
Section 5. 3 - Substitution/Deletion of Projects. If the
City does not proceed with the Projects described in Section
5. 1 of this agreement, the City may reimburse the County all
funds provided by the County less approved expenses previously
incurred in good faith to acquire the property for open space,
plus accrued interest earnings, on the unexpended balance.
Alternatively, the City may submit specific requests for
project reprogramming to the County for its approval. All
projects proposed for reprogramming must meet open space
f\:int1coop.agt/12-14-90 4
criteria as described in King County Ordinance 8867, Section
1, and Washington Statute Chapter 84 . 34.020 RCW, be submitted
to and recommended by the County's Citizens Oversight Committee
or its successor and be approved by action Of the King County
Council. All reprogramming requests shall be submitted to the
County's Department of Parks, Planning and Resources, Office
of Open Space.
Section 5.4 - Eminent Domain. If any Project requires the
exercise of eminent domain to acquire the property all funds
provided pursuant to this agreement plus accrued interest on
such funds shall be reprogrammed as provided in this agreement
or repaid to the County.
Article VI. Responsibilities of the City
Section 6.1 - Matching Requirements., Any Project funded by
Conservation Future Levy proceeds shall be supported by the
City in which the Project is located with a matching
contribution which is no less than the amount of Conservation
Futures Levy funds allocated to the Project. This contribution
Pay be in the form of cash, land trades with a valuation
verified by an appraisal conducted by a MAI certified
appraiser, or credits for other qualifying open space acquired
on or. after January 1, 1989. Any City match, other than cash,
shall require County approval. County approval and County
acceptance of the City's cash match will be transmitted in
writing to the City by the Manager of the County's Office of
Open Space or his successor in function.
If the Project involves two or more suburban cities, those
f\:int1coop.agt/12-14-90 5
cities shall determine the allocation of contributions to the
matching requirements of this agreement, so long as the total
match is no less than the amount of Conservation Futures Levy
funds provided by the County.
Such matching contribution must be available within two
years of the City's application for County funds to support
Projects identified herein or approved substitute Projects.
.If such commitment is not timely made, the County shall be
released from any obligation to fund the Project in question,
and the City shall reimburse the County all funds provided to
the City pursuant to this agreement plus accrued interest on
such funds. All such monies will be available to the County
to reallocate to other approved Projects. By appropriate
legislature action taken not more than 60 days following the
effective date of this agreement, the City shall commit to
contribute its required match.
Section 6.2 - Project Description. As part of the
application to receive Conservation Futures Levy funds from the
County, the City shall submit the following information
concerning each project: 1) a narrative description of the
project; 2) a description of the specific uses for Conservation
Futures Levy funds in the Project; and 3) a description of the
means by which the City will satisfy the matching requirements
contained in this agreement.
Section 6. 3 - Reporting. All funds received pursuant to
this agreement and accrued interest therefrom will be accounted
for separately from all other City funds, accounts and monies.
Until the property described in the Project is acquired and all
f\:int1coop.agt/12-14-90 6
funds provided pursuant to this agreement expended, the City
shall provide semi-annual written reports to the County within
30 days of the end of each relevant time period. The semi-
annual report shall contain the following information: a) an
accounting of all cash expenditures and encumbrances in support
of the Project; b) the status of each Project and any changes
to the approved time line; and c) other relevant information
requested by the County for the purpose of determining
compliance with this agreement.
Following acquisition of the property and expenditure of
all funds provided pursuant to this agreement, the City shall
provide the County with a final report, within 90 days of the
end of the calendar year in which all funds were expended.
Said report shall contain a summary of all project
expenditures, a description of the project status and
accomplishments and other relevant information requested by the
county for the purpose of verifying compliance with this
agreement.
The City shall also provide the County, within 90 days of
the end of each calendar year, annual reports which specify
any change in the status of the Project during the prior year
and any change in the status of the Project which the City
reasonably anticipates during the ensuing year. Such reports
shall be required only if a change has taken place or is
anticipated, except as provided, above for ongoing and final
project reports. All such reports shall be submitted to the
County's Department of Parks, Planning and Resources, Office
of Open Space,9
f\:inticoop.agt/12-14-90 7
Section 6.4 - Disposition of Remaining Funds. Open Space
Bond funds as authorized by Ordinance 9071, are available for
Projects identified in - this agreement. If allocation of
Conservation Futures Levy funds to such Projects produces an
excess of revenues over the approved cost of the Projects, then
as to such excess funds, the City will: 1) reprogram such
excess funds as set forth in this agreement; or 2) justify to
the County's satisfaction that such excess funds are necessary
to complete the Project; or 3) repay such excess funds to the
County.
If the City does not expend all funds provided through this
agreement and no substitute project is requested or approved
as to the excess funds, such funds shall be refunded to the
County. For purposes of this section, "funds" shall include
all monies provided by the County plus interest accrued by the
City on such monies.
Section 6. 5 - Maintenance, in Perpetuity. The City, and any
successor in interest, agree to maintain properties acquired
with funds provided pursuant to this agreement as open space
in perpetuity. If the City changes the status or use of
properties acquired with funds provided pursuant to this
agreement to any purpose, the City shall pay the County an
amount in cash to be mutually determined or substitute other
property acceptable to the County. In either case, the value
of the property shall be established at the time of the change
in status or use, based on the changed status or use and not
based on its value as open space.
Upon changes in status and/or use of the property acquired
fr:inticon».artt/19-tn-qn R
herein, at its own cost, the City will provide the County an
independent MAI appraisal in accordance with this section. The
value established by the appraisal will not be binding on the
County. 'The City shall provide the County with written notice
prior to the change of use and shall reimburse the County
within 90 days of such notification. Reimbursement not
received within 90 days will accrue interest at the then legal
rate.
Article VII. Responsibilities of the County
Subject to the terms of this agreement, the County will
provide Conservation Futures Levy funds in the amount shown in
Attachment A. The City may request additional funds; however,
the County has no obligation to provide funds to the City in
excess of the amount shown in Attachment A. The County assumes
no obligation for -future support of the Projects described
herein except as expressly set forth in this agreement.
Article VIII. Other Provisions
Section 8. 1 - Hold Harmless and Indemnification.
A. The County assumes no responsibility for the payment
of any compensation, fees, wages, benefits or taxes to or on
behalf of the City, its employees, contractors or others by
reason of this agreement. The City shall protect, indemnify
and save harmless the County, its officers, agents and
employees from any and all claims, costs and whatsoever
occurring or resulting from: 1) .the City's failure to pay any
compensation, wage, fee, benefits or taxes; and 2) the
supplying to the City of work, services, materials or supplies
by City employees or agents or other contractors or suppliers
f\:int1coop.agt/12-14-90 9
in connection with or in support of performance of this
agreement.
B. The City further agrees that it is financially
responsible for and will repay the County all indicated amounts
following an audit exception, which occurs due to the negligent
or intentional acts or failure for any reason to comply with
the terms of this agreement by the City, its officers,
employees, agents or representatives.
C. The City shall protect, defend, indemnify, and save
harmless the County from any and all costs, claims, judgments,
or awards of damages, arising out of or in any way resulting
from the negligent acts or omissions of the City, its officers,
employees or agents. For purposes of this agreement only, the
City agrees to waive the immunity granted it for industrial
insurance claims pursuant to Washington Statute Chapter 52 to
the extent necessary to extend its obligations under this
paragraph to any claim, demand or cause of action brought by
or on behalf of any employees, including judgments, awards and
costs arising therefrom including attorneys' fees.
Section 8.2 - Amendment. The parties reserve the right to
amend or modify this agreement. Such amendments or
modifications must be by written instrument signed by the
parties and approved by the respective City and County
Councils.
Section 8. 3 - Contract Waiver. No waiver by either party
of any term or condition of this ,agreement shall be deemed or
construed to be a waiver of any other term or condition, nor
shall a waiver of any breach be deemed to constitute a waiver
f\:inticoop.agt/12-14-90 10
of any subsequent breach whether of the same or different
provision of this agreement. No waiver shall be effective
unless made in writing.
Section 8 .4 - Entirety. This agreement is the complete
expression of the terms hereto and any oral representations or
understandings not incorporated are excluded. This agreement
merges and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations
and agreements between the parties relating to the projects and
constitutes the entire agreement between the parties. The
parties recognize that time is of the essence in the
performance of the provisions of this agreement.
f\�intlennn.an+ /i�_tn_on ii
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives of the
parties hereto have signed their names in the spaces set forth
below•
KING COUNTY CITY OF Kent
By•
TIM HILL Dan Kelleher, Mayor, City of Kent
King County Executive
Date: Date:
Acting under authority bf Acting under authority of
authority • of Motion authority of Motion
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
NORM MALENG
King County Prosecuting Attorney Kent City Attorney
0 0 ,11
�
03
M wr w A= •
w
V r .-Iy�irN Je]R fC J
l
Y e
Yr Yr�YIlo sp s 08 � M_N_M_���OG
F
RN
o I p w r
3 n � Pj
En n H
r g� HngH�+ p� T H
9 n� � � �#a n� t om:5+� ^tt 1 !' 9 r N H 'o
# # lito Kra zo � 3
U, n W
AI r] M
1i l9l B l # MUSEUM � 91 1P re p go 1 z
•r
ji
9 #� l ## Bill 111103012N B #
9 lip AN
v not �r
11
91 9 l l l
NOY
'A Kent City Council Meeting
' Date January 2 . 1991
� L 0 Category Consent Calendar
KITCHEN REHABILITATION AND HANDICAPPED ACCESS.
PROJECTCEIE
Acceptance of the combined Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) Special Populations Resource
Center Rehabilitation Project and the handicapped access project
as complete and authorization to release the retainage upon
receipt of state releases.
3 . EXHIBITS• NONE
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Department
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCALJPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: the proiects were completed within the
approved budget using a combination of block grant and City funds
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 30
i
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2. 199!
Category Consent Calendar
KIWANIS TOT LOT NO. 4
�'. 1 __ Acceptance of the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Kiwanis Tot Lot No. 4 project as complete.
3 . EXHIBITS: NONE
4. RECOMMENDED `BY: Parks Department
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: the project was completed using Park
Maintenance labor force within the approved $7 , 048 block grant
project budget.
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3P
\� \� Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 . 1991
Category Other Business
� BdE2T: EMERGENCY SLIDE REPAIR CANYON DR. AT 94TH AVENUE .
.2; The Public Works Committee has
recommended that an emergency be declared to repair the slide
that occurred in Mill Creek Canyon adjacent to Canyon.Drive in
the vicinity of 94th Avenue. The cost of the repairsA"bstimated
to be $100,000 which will be taken from the Unemcumbered Funds
of the Sewerage Utility. Because of the emergent nature of the
issue and the recent disruption of City business due to the
weather this has not been to Operations Committee for their
review.
'i
3. EXHIBITS: IBC note and excerpt from Public Works Committee
minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED Public Works Committee
(Committee, 'Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISgkL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCWPERSONNEL, NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
that the repair of the slide on Canyon Road at 94th be declared
an emergency, that a budget be established for the project and
that $100, 000 be transferred .from the Unemcumbered balance of
the Sewerage Utility. << c>eld—C'co «A'lce +-he ry\ a c: n
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
Public Works Committee
December 18 , 1990
Page 6
high hazard list for many years. It is recommended that the
turning movements at these intersections be restricted throughout
the whole day. To change the turning movements to right in and
right out only at these intersections would cost approximately
$15, 620 for which we would transfer funds from the street overlay
fund. Dennis Byerly stated that to the best of his knowledge the
Police Department concurs with the action. The Committee
unanimously recommended approval of restricting the turning
movements as proposed and reallocating the funds.
Water System Plan Amendment
Wickstrom explained the amendment consists primarily of
clarification of issues raised in the DSHS review of our 1988 plan.
Since the original plan was adopted by ordinance, this amendment
would have to be adopted by ordinance as well. The Committee
unanimously recommended adoption of the amendments of the ,Water
System Plan.
Emergency Slide Repair - Canyon Road at 94th
Wickstrom explained that during the recent storm there was a slide
in Mill Creek in the vicinity of 94th on Canyon Drive side. The
slide is about ten feet from the pavement and is due to saturated
fill . Since the integrity of Canyon Drive could be in jeopardy, it
is recommended the repair be declared an emergency so that we might
forego the normal bidding requirements and proceed with the repair.
It is estimated the repair would be $1oo , 000 which would be paid
from the unencumbered funds of the sewerage utility. We will also
seek FEMA reimbursement. The Committee unanimously concurred with
the request,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
December 12, 1990
-TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council
FROM: Don Wickstrom to
RE: Emergency Slide Repair - Canyon Drive at 94th
After the last storm event, a slide occurred in Mill Creek Canyon
adjacent to Canyon Drive in the vicinity of 94th Avenue. We feel
the slide if not immediately addressed could aggravate and affect .
Canyon Drive itself. As such, we are acting on it as an emergency
situation and will seek Council's declaration of same along with
the budgeting therefor at the next Council meeting.
We estimate (very roughly) the cost to repair to be somewhere
around $100, 000. We will be seeking FEMA financial reimbursement
for same.
cc: City Administrator
Message. Dated: 12/20/90 at 1505.
Subject: EMERGENCY SLIDE REPAIR - CANYON @ 94TH
tender: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Contents: 3.
Karen SIEGEL / KENT70/PW
Part 1.
TO: Paul SCOTT / KENT70/PW
Karen SIEGEL / KENT70/PW
Don WICKSTROM / KENT70/PW
CC: Ed CHOW / KENT70/AD
Mayene MILLER / KENT70/FN
Part 2.
THE FISCAL NOTE FOR THE JANUARY 2ND COUNCIL MEETING.
Part 3.
THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS REQUESTING $100,000 FROM THE SEWERAGE FUND
FOR EMERGENCY SLIDE REPAIR ON 94TH AND CANYON DRIVE. THE EXPENDITURE WILL
BE CHARGED TO THE DRAINAGE PORTION OF THE SEWERAGE FUND.
IT'S THE IBC'S UNDERSTANDING THAT THE REPAIRS NEED TO BE MADE, BUT THE IBC
IS CONCERNED ABOUT DRAINAGE REVENUES COVERING DRAINAGE EXPENDITURES. FUNDS
FOR THE EXPENDITURES WILL COME FROM THE FUND BALANCE OF THE COMBINED SEWERAGE
FUND, BUT 1990 DRAINAGE EXPENDITURES ARE EXPECTED TO SUBSTANTIALLY EXCEED
aINAGE REVENUES PARTIALLY BECAUSE OF THE TWO 1990 FLOODS BUT ALSO BECAUSE THE
uiTY HAS NOT HAD A DRAINAGE RATE INCREASE SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE UTILITY IN
1986.
THE IBC RECOMMENDS THE EXPENDITURE FROM THE UNENCUMBERED FUNDS OF THE SEWERAGE
UTILITY, BUT RECOMMENDS SERIOUS CONSIDERATION FOR IMPLEMENTING THE DRAINAGE
RATE INCREASE THAT HAS BEEN BUDGETED FOR SINCE 1989 BUT HAS NOT BEEN
IMPLEMENTED.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date January 2 . 1991
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: ENTRY SIGNS
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Public Works Committee has
recommended approval of the design for entry signs to be placed
at major arterials coming into the City. The proposed design
will be presented to the Council for approval.
3 . EXHIBITS: Public Works Committee minutes and draft of
proposed design
4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4B
Public Works Committee
November 20, 1990
Page 2
plans have included Jason as a north-south extension to 228th and
if carried out would include a signal at James and Jason. Because
of staff constraints we would not be able to do a study of all of
James in a short time frame. White asked if some alternatives
could be developed - from simplest to most complex - with proposed
costs in the next couple of weeks and bring it back to Committee.
Utility Bill 415-421 Cloudy Street
Wickstrom reminded the Committee that this item is in response to
a property owner being upset over a high sewer bill for his duplex.
The operating policy is that if a duplex is on one meter it is
charged a commercial rate for sewer which is based on water
consumption. A separate meter could be installed such that each
unit would be charged a residential rate. The policy could also be
updated such that anything up to a triplex be considered a single
family residence which would be consistent with Kent City Code for
business license requirements. Wickstrom stated he would have no
problems with that. White asked if we had received other similar
complaints. Lindsey said there had been a few. White suggested
that a written policy be developed such that for purposes of
utility billing units up to triplex be considered single family
residences. It was determined the policy should be developed by
the Finance Department. Carol Morris suggested amending our
utility service ordinance to address this rather than just a
policy. This will be brought back before the Committee for review.
Recycling Emblem
Karen Siegel submitted the winning design for a City recycling
emblem to the Committee for their approval. The Committee
concurred with the final design.
Entry Way Signs
Heydon and Olson presented a design for entry way signs to the
Committee. The Committee concurred with the color choice of blue
and green and the design. The Committee recommended approval to
the full Council.
Request for Vacation of Walkway - Parkside Division 2
Wickstrom proposed relocating the fences, regrade the walkway,
remove the stumps, install a catch basin, develop a gravel walkway
and install lights. The cost for these improvements would be
approximately $5, 500 which could be paid for from existing
operating budget. He will take this to IBC for their approval as
Public Works Committee
August 7 , 1990
Page 3
Mr. and Mrs. Rust asked several questions concerning the Trammell
Crow development. Mr. and Mrs. Rust will be kept informed as to
the status of the project.
City Entry Signs and Central Business District Signs
Nizlek displayed the sign that has been developed for the Central
Business District signs and demonstrated the 20 areas at which they
will be placed. The cost is approximately $1,200 . Ed Olson and
Tim Heydon presented a proposed design for the "Welcome to Kent"
signs. Olson emphasized these signs are planned to be placed just
within the city limits at every major arterial coming into the
City. It is estimated the cost for the signs would be $4, 500 to
$5, 000. The Committee suggested that Olson bring back a final
design as prepared by the artist for their approval and this would
then be taken to Council for full Council approval.
94th Avenue Between Canyon and James
Nizlek stated the 25 MPH stencils have been placed. The other
issue that was to be addressed was how to place temporary traffic
circles. Nizlek described the application which would use barrels
at two locations, one on 94th Avenue S. at S. 244th and the other
at S. 242nd Street. Estimated cost would be $12, 000. Nizlek
stated there are no funds available for this. Funds were requested
in the 1990 budget process for neighborhood traffic controls but
was not approved. Funds have again been requested in the 1991
budget. If you wish to proceed with this temporary modification
this year, we will have to request a mid-year budget change.
Dowell asked how the temporary measures that are in place now are
working. Nizlek stated that vehicles have been "spinning" their
wheels on the 25 MPH stencils. Nizlek stated he has observed this
has happened in other areas that have similar street markings. Mr.
Dunn stated the temporary measures have helped a little. Dowell
restated his concern about the need for enforcement of. the speed
limit in residential areas. White asked about the public safety
issues of speed humps for this area. Nizlek replied that the fire
chief certainly prefers not to have anything that would change the
elevation of the vehicles. Nizlek stated he would be hesitant to
recommend speed humps given the speeds that are occurring. White
asked if these temporary circles do not clear up the problem
sufficiently what would be the next step. Nizlek commented perhaps
increased enforcement would be the next measure. White stated he
would be willing to try the temporary circles using the barrels and
asked about funding. Wickstrom stated there are funds in the CIP
? ./!:�'.' .:)s%jl`:l3Y:y:;gs'iin::: :.::."✓+<:i'.:i%Yeu.�'i%L>•o�ii.S.N,<fY;^,:3 r<i`:`?`:�rf;'f^n�si:Sfo:.Y:?H:i^I' '/.<`f J ':.L` er�.,o•.::';'.•'r'�s�'g�
,... :Y!� ;;3� .,�'i,':`�':t'.C� R£i"G.'9`.,sGx�S'.�t• ia�:.%'3.:'..�'•lr",iiti�ih::iii6eF,'r,.i{':.•:iS4:Gn�`,'.iawsi'v):9i,'e:i.:Giii/.2'O.'e`i'rb:GiR,.i..'''YGiii3o.Gia�.Qk�'k��'��,`ws"��.;r''' •`•'�'}r�'Gi'f'�,f"6"'v` `;i4G;e�SfiY:,'t
Y'Y N a
t : ;
l
N'� +��4r.•Y.
Yy. .::iJ;y�i �rYi3G v:', •:.%: •:�1 fyy ,.� r� s ., a
t$'"S:t:. %?:?iG'ta•a .yt.'a,.. )::i&Y'tf"�:•''i�bii: �`r.><;+.N.a.Yy.. x :r '�;i :fa .<� t
.y. r:irr'�:,Y�yn'N:':::i�::t":x rx`!`�•,:;. �:% :: %.�,'yi`.:n..:9x.. ,r. {~G: .,,; x': ,,,�>w��•.,pix. '%� � 1�� 'i`P'^
;v ., � G: .rl ,,33ii•�.���.�x�+` t.,,.ss.. x:�. .�.G3�i!� � '' ;::�'. Y .�,3,..iJ":3�?S', f'� '9`8.
'/rC..'f3 f' .�"' 'i S3,*.;:% 3'+''sN.r.+t3•`,�gt`L': ::9•G.';,:`,�'r.:r�. Y lF• `> f. .:r /' �`, :'r. :3� s< <•8,
L. . :%':'. .::?Z:`.:'�w•t'. .Gf(s"Tfi, :.5. ,{{:,�i::i:'•..';�16'.. i:;. ,..�>.;yG.r.. . '` r}E, g"i`((,fF`,:� .;a. 3r�Yu.,�- .,��' '.. 3 ��.
::r '�".:� ...'hty.:i..: '::Y:::G:r �:ciY:.4*.+x,.:: .t+��.:�$ Y. .:/m•.ii,.� � h. ..;i.ff:.: 1:9.`
'C G��i'%i3s ' '�;ry,<. ?#:£.,:::2 f�"'"'' :: E.• ,i$r.: .§'. �. .ksG>�}.3 tij5 �• �r
"�: :i:'+'}i. :y{•» �'�% .3'��� i.�a�.`: ' ,y .3.. p.' < ..:�+` G '::;G i:N. r'9�u c3�a:p .: ,: +
..�':'•. � Y''/.,•,e.•.iilii;.tf:Y%: :s:;,•3:�..,v�,��:a�.��+,�i;. •f^
.y,:•;Y 3Rtivl;r„;;t,;. .rH.X-:»ju+ij;'+F' :•if?:)x;;^.i)�:;;:3 G�a✓,:zz:':::y','i33x`'''`G'�i;:i3'o:. `'io:
�y+<:✓<w"e^�f�'9':fnfa:fi��a'::JaG::. ,2:.k..%h#::3.3i'�.:3i3/,.i:iF$::�{:;�:;/rt�#:i. ff.;:o:.ai�C::`a,.,.i,:.;c.:�.a:.,
r)F'.i3kbx•>:f.�.;� :;{3r..Na ,.S•& o-'.f3!:,:y .:.r%•r;;:;iY•:�:+.^;i .n,;xr,S<.,.:N '�3:i ;Ar..' "°ti'Y:%ik::r,.:;�:';:.>.; c
:>. < :>�'siA' •.;:+:.i.:.#:: �#.. i� :;,r>:;fty::) ti:::f�::i3..%'�. # .:.3i .�Y:.,. ef•:�a'r:i:::, , if
:; '�i .>„p' if?iit' r'.f,'fFr..:Y.,i!.ti'a:3:t�.;;:::i:`::f3>.:..v.��yy:rY::ia.�' ;'f•:v NSt;s:.v`�„v a.x�:� qi:.. .. �s
.d :3: Y:� :..3..i,,r...:.n:.,.:�' �Asf'+s�• �:kf"Y.t!r;j � : :,�i§x>,S`i;,.:::f::., l" `.rr'�:a s> f.:? ,.� ,G:>< •.. y.. a:»>^':Y:•aa>:;ai .>.;Nx .:. r ,:i.:.: . ,
.Y�ra r�• °'/�t?%o ��r�'(ew'1''�,:.G��:�'::�k�::oi:?i.s f .::xc:: ':)'}::r;.7.::.r,�i:•i?. C:::;ti'':>}:e:.'ts�. fi':Yb:.Y.¢;�'::;:;+. fa;.,
.}' /i�'y':::ftr:%3$:;,:..')+,a!✓! i .i><C'.Y�<i;if54. {r))..:. '.. .;..{:'++Y.
Y:�{�`l'��� .:i,t:�>Yi:n': �$'•.(� �:�� �a;•v >iYi.f3Y:::i�F. }�
mco M- mile
"�? ... '�:•.•,SJGiib:',�r:t'wi,'SE:i35:G:Ry��c�R'�:.Y'aG'i ii .;'k4. a
i r
.. f.<��..('s':1i�R,..;.o. .,:. .:iC...,,.,.f•:.fi :,:.'�f..f.,..:..%. ..: :...: .. �: :: ,.:..:.5... ..:i'.f. Y #.f.:",.'f .::..: .i➢.::I. '
ni Kent City Council Meeting
¢tti Date January 2 . 1991
` �' Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT FOR FUELS
2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign
contracts with the successful respondents of our solicitation
for quotes. We solicited quotations from several vendors and
are recommending Associated Petroleum and Suburban Propane.
3 . EXHIBITS: Attached memo from Charles Lindsey
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS: already budgeted in 1991 budget
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember— �- ''� moves, Councilmember W seconds
To authorize the Mayor to sign contracts with Associated
Petroleum and Suburban Propane.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 4C
MEMO
DATE: November 16, 1990
TO: Tony McCarthy, Operations Committee, and CiZFROM: Charlie Lindsey, Customer Services ManagSUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO CONTRACT FOR FUELS ���llk"'
We recently solicited quotations for the purchase of fuels and are
requesting authorization for the Mayor to sign contracts with the
successful respondents. Following is a list of those responding
and approximate contract value.
GASOLINE AND DIESEL
COMPANY U/L Prem U/L Reg Diesel Contr Value 91 Budget
Assoc Petro $1 . 3097 $1. 1983 $1. 2432 $191 , 517 . 80 $207, 870 . 00
Shultz Oil 1. 3525 1. 2125 1. 2385 194, 919 . 00
Don Small 1. 2675 1. 2565 1. 3045 200, 518 . 00
Approximate annual gallonage is 55, 000 of premium, 80, 000 of regular,
and 19 , 000 diesel .
PROPANE
COMPANY Propane Tank Rent Install Contr Value 91 Budget
American $. 6490 $2 . 00 $ 94 . 00 $ 7 , 883 . 00 $13 , 810 . 00
Ferrell . 8300 2 . 00 none 9 , 961. 00
Pacer . 6350 none 400. 00 8 , 020. 00
Suburban . 6290 none none 7 , 548 . 00
Approximate 12 , 000 annual gallonage.
Amounts quoted were based on prices to these suppliers as of 10-5-90.
Due to the fluctating prices of petroleum products we have included in
the contracts a clause that allows for pass through on a dollar for
dollar basis price increases as well as decreases which allows for
competive pricing in an uncertain market. Based on the best overall
pricing we are recommending that we contract with Associated Petroleum
for gasoline and diesel and Suburban Propane for propane.
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
A.
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
i
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
i`
C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
D. PLANNING COMMITTEE
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
F. PARKS COMMITTEE
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS