The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 06/19/1990 e . 777T.Ox F` City of. KentyCouncl MeetingiC t s�Agenda Mayor Dan Kelleher Council Members Judy Woods, President Leona Orr Steve Dowell Christi Houser ion Johnson Paul Mann Jim White June 19, 1990 Office of the city Clerk .... ..... ...... ..... EX .. . .. ....... .. . CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 19, 1990 Summary Agenda City of Kent Council Chambers d� Office of the City Clerk 7 : 00 p.m. /r d106p�RA NOTE: Items on the Consent Calendar are either routine or have been previously discussed. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember. The Council may add and act upon other items not listed on this agenda. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Q A. Presentation of Kent-Kherson Flag U nt 2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Mortensen Annexation No. AZ-88-2 3 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes B. Approval of Bills C. Contract Modifications - Sanitary Sewer Service - Midway Housing I, 4 . OTHER BUSINESS A. I.A.C. Grant Application - Green River Trail Park - Resolution B. I.A.C. Grant Application - Lake Fenwick Park - Resolution C. I.A.C. Grant Application - East Hill Neighborhood Park - Resolution D. Secretarial Position - King County Fire District No. 37 E. HVAC Delivery System Cleaning F. Brokered Natural Gas Use Tax Agreement and Ordinance G. Parking Infraction Penalty - Ordinance H. Right-of-Way Acquisition - 228th and 64th ( � I. 1990 Asphalt Overlay - Transfer of Funds :1, t (-NiA 'cfai,)' P'ropfrVf j 5. BIDS A. Physical Fitness Equipment for East Hill Complex B. Radio Transmitter Tower C. 1990 Asphalt Overlay 6. REPORTS CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT � 7 . EXECUTIVE SESSION Administration requests an executive session to discuss pending litigation that will last approximately 15 minutes. No Council action is anticipated following the executive session. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. Presentation of Kent-Kherson Flag klai t Lit ce, a Kjol k� I � � Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 , 1990 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: MORTENSEN ANNEXATION NO. AZ-88-2 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public hearing is the first of two hearings to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation for initial zoning of R1-20, Single Family Residential (20, 000 square foot minimum lot size) for the Mortensen Annexation No. AZ-88-2 . The property is approximately 9 acres in size and is located in the vicinity of 98th Ave. S. and S. 218th St. The second public hearing will be held on August 7, 1990. 3. EXHIBITS: Staff report; Hearing Examiner minutes; Findings and Recommendation. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner 5/16/90 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO � YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS: OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT• CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:Councilmember moves, Councilmember W,6 seconds to continue this public hearing to August 7, 1990. DISCUSSION• ACTION: - Council Agenda Item No. 2A KENT PLANNING AGENCY STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF MAY 21 1990 FILE NO: MORTENSON ANNEXATION #AZ-88-2 APPLICANT: CITY OF KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT REOUEST: The request is to set the permanent zoning of R1-20, Single-Family Residential, to a 393,754 square foot area (approximately nine (9) acres of land) located in the vicinity of 98th Avenue S. and S. 218th. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: ALICE SHOBE STAFF RECOMMENDATION: R1-20, Single Family Residential, with minimum 20, 000 square feet lots. I . GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal The Mortenson annexation (annexed in July 1989, Ordinance #2860) is composed of approximately nine (9) acres. A zoning designation of R1-20, Single Family Residential is recommended by staff for the entire annexed parcel. All newly annexed land is given an interim zoning designation of R1-20, Single Family Residential, minimum lot size of 20, 000 square feet. This interim zoning remains in effect until the Hearing Examiner and City Council establish the initial zoning for the newly annexed area. B. Location The Mortenson annexation area is located in the vicinity of 98th Avenue S. and S. 218th. (See attached map) C. Size of Property The annexation area is approximately nine (9) acres in size. 1 Staff Report Mortenson Annexation #AZ-88-2 D. Zoninq The property is currently zoned R1-20, Single Family Residential. The property was previously zoned SR IS, 000 (King County) . Surrounding property to the south is also zoned R1-20. The property to the west (in King County) is zoned SR 15, 000. The two existing lots exceed the minimum lot size as specified in the development standards for the proposed standards R1-20 zoning. E. Comprehensive Plan The City of Kent first adopted a City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan in 1969 . This Plan, updated in 1971 and 1977, addresses a broad range of land use considerations. The goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan represent an expression of community intentions and aspirations concerning the future of Kent and the area within the Sphere of Interest. The Comprehensive Plan is used by the Mayor, City Council, City Administrator, Planning Commission, Hearing Examiner and City departments to guide growth, development, and spending decisions. Residents, land developers, business representatives and others may refer to the plan as a statement of the City' s intentions concerning future development. The City of Kent has also adopted a number of subarea plans that address specific concerns of certain areas of the City. Like the City-wide Plan, the subarea plans serve as policy guides for future land use in the City of Kent. The area under consideration in this instance is covered by the East Hill Plan. The East Hill Plan Map designates the Mortenson area as SF6, Single Family, 4 to 6 units per acre. CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE OVERALL GOAL: ASSURE A DECENT HOME AND SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT FOR FAMILIES DESIRING TO LIVE IN KENT. GOAL 1: Preserve, maintain and improve the City's existing residential neighborhoods. 2 Staff Report Mortenson Annexation #AZ-88-2 Objective 1: Actively encourage the retention and improvement of existing residential neighborhoods on East Hill, West Hill and the Valley Floor. Policy 1: Utilize regulatory measures, such as zoning, to provide both interim protection to existing residential neighborhoods which will not be retained, and to protect and improve the neighborhoods to be preserved. GOAL 2 : Guide new residential development into areas where the needed services and facilities are available, and in a manner which is compatible with existing neighborhoods. Planning Department Comment: This goal supports objectives and policies which encourage development of new single-family housing and protect existing single-family neighborhoods from adverse impacts of new development. In recent years, the City of Kent has developed at a rapid pace. In 1989, the City issued over $170 million in building permits--one of the busiest years on record. Yet even in this peak year of construction, the number of single-family residential permits was minimal (34) . The City of Kent, as of April 1990, had 11, 994 apartment units. These units made up 65 . 5 percent of the housing stock. Single-family homes made up 30 percent, and the balance were mobile homes. Zoning the Mortenson annexation property for single-family residential uses would work to address the perceived imbalance between single-family and multifamily housing types in Kent. Under the R1-20 zoning, approximately 18 single family homes could be developed. II. HISTORY A. Site History This area was annexed into the City of Kent in July 1989 by Ordinance Number 2860. The annexed area and surrounding area are predominately residential in nature. 3 Staff Report Mortenson Annexation #AZ-88-2 B. Area History The East Hill area of Kent was first settled in the early 1900s. Since that time commercial and residential development have grown steadily. III. LAND USE Land uses adjacent to the annexation area include: to the east and north of the annexation area, unincorporated King County residential, to the south large vacant lots zoned, R1-201 and to the west developed residential homes zoned R1-12 . IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS A. Significant Physical Features 1. Topoctraphy and Hydrolocry The proposed annexation area has a rolling terrain with the steepest slope approximately ten (10) percent. 2 . Vegetation Vegetation in the annexation area includes deciduous trees, evergreen trees, grass, and shrubs. C. Significant Social Features 1. Street System The subject property has access to S . 218th Street and 98th Avenue S. which is classified as a collector arterial. The streets have a public right-of-way width of sixty (60) feet while the actual width of paving is twenty four (24) feet. A widening strip will not be required to be deeded to the city. New left turn lanes will not be required. The average daily traffic count on the street is 1, 000 vehicle trips per day. This site may be in the 224th/228th Streets proposed alignment. 4 Staff Report Mortenson Annexation #AZ-88-2 2 . Water System The site is presently receiving water service from Soos Creek Sewer and Water District and is within their service area. 3 . Sanitary Sewer System There is an existing eight-inch sanitary sewer line in S. 218th Street adjacent to the most westerly property line of the site. 4 . Storm Water System A storm water system has already been constructed on the subject property in accordance with the Kent Surface Water and Drainage Code. Additional improvements are not necessary. 5. LID's There are no existing or proposed LIDS at this time. VI. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW The Planning Department has reviewed this proposed zoning in relation to the Comprehensive Plan, current zoning, land use, street system, flood control problems and comments from other departments and agencies and finds that: A. The Comprehensive Plan Map and East Hill Plan Map designates the site as SF6, Single Family Residential, 4 to 6 units per acre. B. The property is currently under an interim zoning designation of R1-20, Single Family Residential. This interim designation is given to all land annexed into the City until such time as the initial zoning designations are determined. C. Land uses adjacent to the annexation area include: to the east and north of the annexation area is unincorporated King County residential; to the south large vacant lots zoned R1-20; and to the west developed residential homes zoned R1-12 . 5 Staff Report Mortenson Annexation #AZ-88-2 D. All nine lots exceed the minimum lot size as specified in the development standards for the R1-20, Single-family Residential, zoning district. VII. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Staff recommends to the Hearing Examiner that the zoning for the Mortenson annexation remain R1-201 Single Family Residential . KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT April 23 , 1990 6 City of Kent - Planning Department ! J I \ \ \ 1 — tr + Il / \ + I 1 \ \\ +l \ \\ 11 NO t� /I1 1 \ / / 1 (� 1 11 t 1 •. \ ( g /�%�i /ice^ �/ i c I \\\\ \ 1 � \ o�o�\ \ I /// Il \ 1 \ _\� t / f/ I \\ / \11 \\\I VII,\\ APPLICATION NAME: Mortenson Annexation NUMBER: AZ-88-2 DATE: May 2, 1990 REQUEST: Maintain Initial Zoning of R-1 20 ............... LEGEND ............... ............... ............... ............... ..._. Application site ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP Zoning boundary City limits City of Kent - Planning Department ti � 5 Q�. c 1� ST a S N W SE M TH PL x N 0O w SE 2 218TH ST N w w N J� O 2 M 2 M S 222NO ST APPLICATION NAME: Mortenson Annexation NUMBER: AZ-88-2 DATE: May 2, 1990 REQUEST: Maintain Initial Zoning of R-1 20 LEGEND .............. ............... .............. Application site VICINITY MAP Zoning boundary City limits City of Kent - Planning Department I / ! \ \ \ 1 — I [73 I l\ 1/ 1\ l\\1\ IIS� / i I[3 I Imo\ I\ �_�# fi;.�:.::.::.•�.,��.�.� ��:::� � o \ 1 Iif Q\ �\ /r \ 11) 1 /1 {.t;:;';:;::\ems'•: \ ) I � Inv l i 1111 I 1} � °I I I '+�.'+�?I:'�:k�•.a": 5�•:; ,•:.:. .•�:•.: \ '��,G�, iiii� i�y„�s� \ 11/1c�� \ 111 \ \ `#?r�4.��;•• ' :�`k;••:::':•;;I :. : ��y� Illy �s;v?-�� JI I\ ) 1 / 1 lb j1 1 J 1 +: ;:• : i: ::ri.r{: :f;�.i' ��?/3j/�� , 9 To rl Ej \ \\ \\\ Olt i r APPLICATION NAME: Mortenson Annexation NUMBER: AZ-88-2 DATE: May 2, 1990 REQUEST: Maintain Initial Zoning of R-1 20 ............... LEGEND ............... ............... ............... Application site ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP Zoning boundary City limits City of Kent - Planning Department ti ST a S' C3l��y � Uj SE 213TH PL cc N o 0 LL' SE 2 X. 218TH ST LO w w N �I 0 O m M m m S 222ND ST o APPLICATION NAME: Mortenson Annexation NUMBER: AZ-88-2 DATE: May 2, 1990 REQUEST: Maintain Initial Zoning of R-1 20 LEGEND `':; Application site VICINITY MAP Zoning boundary City limits Hearing Examiner Minutes May 2 , 1990 water system should be eliminated. Ms. Duty stated the project will meet all performance standards. City staff is recommending approval with conditions. Ms. Duty requested an additional condition be added; that is, the site across the street be vacated and natural vegetation restored. Ms. Duty commented the site to the west is an illegal use and no storage is allowed. Mr. Hunter asked if the applicant would like to comment. Will Wolfert, Barghausen Consulting Engineers, Inc. , stated the applicant is in agreement with the findings and memo from City' s Traffic Engineer. Mr. Wolfert commented the area west of the site will be vacated and natural vegetation restored. Ms. Duty requested the area to the west be restored in six months: Mr. Wolfert asked for a longer time period. He commented the applicant has been using that site for several years and would need longer than six months to be in compliance with the Zoning Code. There were no public comments. The hearing was closed at 3 : 25 pm. MORTENSON Annexation #AZ-88-2 A public hearing to consider the request by the City of Kent,Planning Department, 220 Fourth Avenue S . , Kent, WA 98032 , to set permanent zoning of R1-20, Single-Family Residential, on approximately nine acres of land located in the vicinity of 98th Avenue S. and S . 218th. Alice Shobe, Kent Planning Department, reviewed the staff report. Ms. Shobe gave a brief review of the request for zoning. Ms. Shobe showed the view foils depicting 1) the location of the site and 2) the zoning of the site and surrounding property. The City staff is recommending R1-20, Single-Family Residential, zoning. There were no public comments. The hearing was closed at 3 : 27 pm. 2 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF KENT FILE NO: MORTENSON #AZ-88-2 APPLICANT: CITY OF KENT, PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUEST: The request is to set the permanent zoning of R1-20, Single-Family Residential, to a 393 , 754 square foot area. LOCATION: The property is located in the vicinity of 98th Avenue S. and S. 218th. APPLICATION FILED: 7/21/89 DEC. OF NONSIGNIFICANCE: ISSUED• 1/26/89 MEETING DATE: 5/2/90 RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: 5/16/90 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED ZONING OF R1-20 STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Department Kathy McClung, Planning Department Alice Shobe, Planning Department PUBLIC TESTIMONY: None WRITTEN TESTIMONY: None INTRODUCTION After due consideration of all the evidence presented at public hearing on the date indicated above, and following an unaccompanied personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding area by the Hearing Examiner at a time prior to the public hearing, the following findings, conclusions and recommendation are entered by the Hearing Examiner on this application. FINDINGS 1. The applicant requests that the initial zoning designation of R1-20, Single Family Residential with minimum lot size of 20, 000 square feet, become the permanent zoning for the subject property located in the vicinity of 98th Avenue South and South 218th. 1 Findings and Recommendation Mortenson #AZ-88-2 2 . The property was annexed in July of 1989. It was given a zoning designation of R1-20 at that time by operation of Section 15. 03 . 020 of the Kent Zoning Code. 3 . The subject property is approximately 9 acres in size. 4 . Property surrounding the subject property is all zoned for or developed with single-family development. The property to the south is zoned R1-20 and the property to the west is zoned R1- 12 . The property to the east and north is in King County and has been developed with single-family residences. The subject property was previously zoned SR 15, 000 (Single-family Residential with minimum lot size of 9 , 600 square feet) when in King County zoning jurisdiction. 5. The Comprehensive Plan Map and East Hill Plan Map designate the subject property as SF6, Single Family Residential with 4 to 6 units per acre. 6. All lots within the subject property exceed the minimum lot size for the R1-20 zone. 7 . Public notice was properly publised, mailed and posted at least 10 days prior to the public hearing held on this matter. CONCLUSIONS 1. The proposed zoning designation is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans for the area. 2 . The development on the subject property allowed by the zoning designation would be compatible with the development in the vicinity. 3 . There will be no increased burdens on traffic in the area as a consequence of the proposed zoning designation. 4 . The proposed zoning designation will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the citizens of Kent. 5. The proposed zoning designation will assist in preserving and encouraging additional single family zones within the City of Kent consistent with the objective of the Housing Element of the City-wide Comprehensive Plan. 2 Findings and Recommendation Mortenson #AZ-88-2 6. Because the subject property was annexed to the City in 1989 with an Interim Zoning designation, it is appropriate that the property now receive a permanent zoning designation. DECISION Based on the Findings and Conclusions detailed above, it is the recommendation of the Hearing Examiner that the request that the subject property receive a zoning designation of R1-20 be APPROVED without condition or limitation. Dated this 16th day of May, 1990 . THEODORE PAUL HUNTER Hearing Examiner APPEALS FROM HEARING EXAMINER DECISIONS. Request of Reconsideration Any aggrieved person may request a reconsideration of a decision by the Hearing Examiner if either (a) a specific error of fact, law, or judgment can be identified or (b) new evidence is available which was not available at the time of the hearing. Reconsideration requests should be addressed to: Hearing Examiner, 220 Fourth Avenue S. , Kent, WA 98032 . Reconsiderations are answered in writing by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of Right to Appeal The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final unless a written appeal to the Council is filed by a party within 14 days of the decision. The appeal must be filed with the City Clerk. Usually, new information cannot be raised on appeal . All relevant information and arguments should be presented at the public hearing before the City Council. A recommendation by the Hearing Examiner to the City Council can also be appealed. A recommendation is sent to the City Council for a final decision; however, a public hearing is not held unless an appeal is filed. 3 City of Kent - Planning Department ti 5 A wi ST a S N Ujn213THCr ow2 : 218TH ST in w w cn J Q M M � CD � M S 222NO ST APPLICATION NAME: Mortenson Annexation NUMBER: AZ-88-2 DATE: May 2, 1990 REQUEST: Maintain Initial Zoning of R-1 20 LEGEND .............. ............... .............. Application site VICINITY MAP Zoning boundary City limits City of Kent - Planning Department Lb 04 (� 1 \• �1 \�j�g11 aY I I I ( + 1 \I 1 ! 7 1\\t1 11 11 %%/l\I\}j \III I \ ` 1 \ 1 \/ ':'�'y:'��;:''.. �... •y� � Q�%�/_ V��z ig/r ��\ \\\\1 \ (l ) \ JIi 1\ \ \Illrl�l\ \1111 11 —� i t 1111 1 1 �1 APPLICATION NAME: Mortenson Annexation NUMBER: AZ-88-2 DATE: May 2, 1990 REQUEST: Maintain Initial Zoning of R-1 20 ............... LEGEND ............... ............... ............... ::: Application site ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP � Zoning boundary M imi= City limits CONSENT CALENDAR �- 3. City Council Action* ` Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that Consent Calen a Items A °through C l ppro ed. Discussion Action u 3A. Approval of Minutes. Approval of the minutes of the Counciq meeting f une 5, 1990. 3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through June 15, 1990 after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 4:30 p.m. on June 26, 1990. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount ADRroval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers Amount 6/5/90 136376 - 137102 $816, 630. 32 Council Agenda Item No. 3 A-B J A Kent, Washington June 5, 1990 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order by Mayor Kelleher at 6. 00 p.m. at Sunnycrest Elementary School as previously specified and advertised. Present: Councilmembers Dowell, Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr and White, City Administrator Chow, City Attorney Driscoll, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Fire Chief Angelo, Police Chief Frederiksen, Assistant City Administrator Hansen, Personnel Director Olson, Information Services Director Spang and Finance Director McCarthy and City Clerk Jensen. Councilmember Woods was excused from the meeting. Parks Director Wilson was not in attendance. Approximately 140 people were at the meeting. PUBLIC Mayor Kelleher welcomed Senator Eleanor Lee to COMMUNICATIONS tonight's meeting. (PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1A) Nike Manor Housing. Mayor Kelleher explained that this portion of the meeting would be conducted as a committee-of-the-whole meeting and would last from 6: 00 p.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. Jim Hansen introduced representatives Sharon Atkin of the South King County Multi-Service Center, Jerry Perez and Cliff Bartlett of the Highline-West Seattle Mental Health Center, Steven Hansen and Sue Crofut of the Corps of Engineers, and Helen Neill of the St. Stephen Housing Association with Catholic Community Services, and he gave an overview of what has transpired so far. City Attorney Driscoll said there is a letter telling of one option which has not been discussed at prior meetings -- there is a separate federal law which says that when a federal piece of property has been declared surplus, a notice is sent to local governments informing them that they may submit an application to acquire or purchase that piece of property. The letter we received says we have to submit an application within 20 days of the date received which was May 24 . In the initial application the City must set forth the contemplated use of the property and must disclose the length of time it will take to develop and submit a formal application. If Council wants to pursue this, they must submit by June 13 . The Corps looks at other applications pending for use for the homes under the McKinney Act and weighs that against the purpose for which Council would like to 1 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor use the property, and the decision is made by the Housing Corps of Engineers. Sharon Atkin, representing all of the agencies, noted that this is a good opportunity to bring new and increased services to Kent. She indicated that the agencies understand the concern of the residents of the area, and pointed out that the agencies are as concerned about the safety of their clients as the residents are about their families. She noted clients will be screened and that there will be resident managers in the housing, and that any clients who create problems will be asked to leave the program. She noted that she has spoken with the principal of Sunnycrest School, Gay Grieves, and they will work together to determine what, if any, impact the housing would have on Sunnycrest and how it could be mitigated. Atkin stated that there would be approximately 12 children in the emergency housing and 4 in transitional housing. Atkin noted that members of her group had gone door to door in the area to distribute flyers, answer questions, hear concerns, inform people of tonight' s meeting, and leave names and phone numbers of the directors of each of the programs. She said they encountered three families who were angry and felt threatened, but that the majority expressed no concern or supported the idea. She noted that with this program, the community will have access to five agencies which will be available to address their concerns. Dave Lavine of 24906 38th Ave. S. , stated that he hadn't received any flyers. Dave Tervo of 4319 S. 239th Pl. showed syringe caps he had picked up in South Park Housing and stated he did not want a group home or transient housing in this residential area. He recounted the burdens of living with the landfill and suggested that it was time for the burden to be placed elsewhere and suggested the houses could be moved to Bellevue or Redmond. Larry Dome of 24403 35th Ave. S. stated that the Holly Park Housing was a mess and well known to both the police and fire departments. Mrs. Dome stated that the homes would be ideally suited for senior citizens, close to the bus and stores and the young families with children would welcome the seniors. Susan Camacho referred to the millions of dollars 2 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor voted for senior housing and suggested that these Housing homes be used for that purpose. Jean Salz , Director of the South King County Emergency Housing Program, stated that her agency operates 30 apartments in Kent, Renton and Auburn in six different locations. She noted that a complex in Renton is across the street from a senior center and noted only one complaint in 4 years. She noted that these people are good neighbors, that these are regular people trying to get back into the mainstream of society. Stephen Beer of Auburn noted that he was concerned with process, and if populations were to be blended, tight control will be required and that any councilmember with an affiliation with any of these agencies should abstain from voting. He suggested that an advisory committee be formed, to include local residents, to make sure the program is properly run. Patricia Remick said she was concerned about crime and drugs and favored having seniors use the units. Floyd Bacon of 24311 35th Ave. S. , noted that in a January 25 Federal Way paper, a news item told of the proposed availability of these surplused homes. He stated that the citizens of the area found out by chance. Bacon noted that Perez had stated that residents could come and go freely. He concurred with prior speakers that these units would be ideal for seniors and maybe we would not have needed $6,500, 000 for the bond issue. It was determined that the agencies had filed the application. He stated that when two group homes were proposed for East Hill they were not allowed. Peggy Colson of 32nd P1. S. stated she received a flyer from school and was concerned about housing people in rehabilitation programs for alcohol, drugs, mental health or the chronically ill. She favored utilization of the units by senior citizens. Joanne MacDaniels said that all should have an opportunity to improve and that the agencies should have experts "on call" at all times. Chris McDean stated that he lived on East Hill and that there were drugs and alcohol users in all neighborhoods. He suggested that the residents could learn from those who were in the rehabilitation programs. Carol Davis, Box 98746, Des Moines, stated that she was connected with the Des Moines Food Bank and that most clients 3 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor were single parents who wanted to do better and be Housing out of this transitory circumstance. She noted that the church helps to sponsor the clients through Atkin's program. She urged the residents to try to get over their fears and to adopt a family. She noted that Des Moines would welcome having some emergency housing as Kent has. Cathy Peters, 13812 SE 240th, stated that she represented 16 churches which were involved in emergency assistance programs. She opined that the problem was the lack of education in the community as to what the programs were attempting to do. She encouraged the residents to support the agencies and their work. Frank Pepper, of 256th P1 . , suggested that a formal study be made with research from other communities, including the impact on schools and on police departments, and for the Council to decide how the programs would be monitored. Gene Mann of 35th Ave. S. , concurred with Pepper and asked if the City would be ready to handle the problems. He favored having senior citizens only and pointed out that police did not respond to West Hill very promptly. Howard Schwanke of 4121 S . 239th, stated that since some of the military personnel had moved, the condition of the yards had deteriorated, and asked who would maintain the properties. Susan Peterson of 3629 S . 241st expressed concern about crime and drugs. She noted that Section 8 tenants were very difficult to have evicted, and that no background information was given on such residents. Jon Johnson suggested that the regular meeting should start with the Council scheduling an action item for this subject, if they so desired. Dave Tervo suggested that the houses be moved to the East Hill. Amiel Forshee of 4109 S . 243rd Pl. noted that a park would be built on the landfill and that he didn't want anyone from the criminal justice system to be located in the area of the park. Harris confirmed for Bacon that the Planning Commission would meet again on June 25 at 7 : 30 p.m. in the Council chambers. Nola Roe of 3505 S . 256th was told that this would not be "no refusal" funding. Mrs. Dome stated that the law would not allow for certain classes of people to be excluded, although she was turned away when she was in need. Perez explained that proposed residents are screened 4 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor background checks of medical records. Rules are Housing explained and the agency can exclude persons who would not fit into the program. He noted that the agency considered the stability of the person and ability to live with other people. Tervo noted that Perez did not mention behavior. At this time, 7 :45 p.m. , the regular meeting convened with the presentation of the colors by Cub Scouts, the Mayor noted that the first item would be continuation of the Nike Manor Housing discussion. White read Resolution No. 1246 , directing City staff to research and report to the City Council on the feasibility of the City acquiring Nike Manor for the purpose of providing senior housing in addition to that authorized by the bond issue and MOVED for its adoption. Johnson seconded. White then amended the resolution to read "City staff is directed to submit an application to the Army Corps of Engineers for the purchase of Nike Manor for the purpose of providing senior housing in addition to that authorized by the bond issue. " Driscoll noted for Dowell that the application for proposal for purchase of the property can be for any public purpose, not only for housing the homeless. She also noted for Dowell that if the social service agencies controlled the site, they would be leasing the property. Upon Houser' s suggestion, and approval by White and Johnson, the words "prior to June 13" were added to the motion. The City Attorney noted for Orr that she would look into whether the City would need to activate a public housing authority in order to own and operate housing. Cathleen Kennelly asked whether the City would be obligated for five years, and questioned the different classes mentioned in the group housing study. The Mayor clarified that the group housing study is a separate issue and that no group homes are contemplated under any proposals for Nike Housing. He noted that group homes have six or more people living in them. White noted for Kennelly that if the City purchases the property, it would be used for senior housing indefinitely, with no five 5 June 5, 1990 M Nike Manor year limit. The Mayor noted for her that housing Housing for elderly is defined as both parties being over 62 years of age, and meeting certain income requirements. Mayor Kelleher said that since the City has no ordinances differentiating between Class 11 2, and 3, if a group home were located in Kent there would be no classifications. Mann stated that the Council has a responsibility to the homeless and mentally ill in the community. Orr said she shares Mann' s concern for the homeless and urged the citizens to work with the social service agencies if the City's application is turned down. Mrs. Dome said the citizens would be willing to work with the City, but that it must be safe for the neighborhood. Cathy Pepper asked why the City is proposing to purchase rather than lease, and asked if a purchase option would be available to the other agencies. The Attorney explained that the property is made available for purchase to public agencies, such as governments, and that leases fall under the McKinney Act. Driscoll explained that the City can submit an application to purchase the property, but that it will be weighed against other agencies who will house the homeless, and that housing the homeless carries great weight and that the Federal Government will make the final decision. White pledged to do everything possible to purchase the property, but noted that it may fail, and urged the agencies involved to address the concerns of the citizens. Peggy Paulson asked about the possibility of circulating a petition regarding the citizens' rights and safety, and gave her phone number as 946-4793 . Dowell noted for Kennelly that the book she referred to regarding different classes is a different process and that she may want to get involved in that process. Dowell pointed out that agencies involved knew in March that they would be collaborating on this project, and that letters from the Army Corps of Engineers were finally sent to the City on May 24 . He pointed out that none of the councilmembers were aware of this issue at the May 1 meeting. Dowell stated that they were told at the May 1 meeting that it was too late for any input, but that now it is possible to apply to purchase the 6 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor property and that the City should take this Housing opportunity. He also pointed out that it may not be successful. He urged the public to write letters, circulate petitions, and show their concern which may have an affect on the outcome. Dowell explained for Mrs. Dome that the Council directs Administration action. She stated that the Mayor is on the Housing Committee and knew about this plan a year ago. Dome said the people should have the ability to do something about their environment. Bacon said he had written to his legislators and received responses from them and thanked White and Dowell for their support. Lavine asked whether the City could continue to try to purchase the property if the agencies received a 5-year lease from the Corps. Steve Hansen of the Corps of Engineers, noted that they are required to lease the property for a minimum of one year. He noted that it would be possible for the City to acquire the property at the end of the process, and that it would be through the General Services Administration rather than through the Corps of Engineers. White noted for Lavine that it is his intention that the City continue to try to acquire the property. Johnson agreed and the Mayor clarified that the Council ' s intention is to add to the motion to continue to attempt to acquire the property even if the initial attempt at acquisition is not successful. Mann pointed out that homeless people are not criminals, and that the issue of housing the homeless needs to be addressed in the near future. Houser agreed with Mann but noted that West Hill has had enough burdens already. Gene Mann stated that the community would be sympathetic to the homeless only if they are controlled and the neighborhood is protected and Larry Dome agreed. Patricia Remick thanked the Mayor and Council for the opportunity for the community to voice their opinions. Regarding notification to the residents, Jim Hansen explained that a sign-up sheet had been passed around at the May 1 Council meeting and that a mailing list had been compiled from that, along with names of interested people who called after the June 5, 1990 Nike Manor meeting. He said that there had also been press Housing coverage. He asked that people who wish to be notified in the future print their names on another sheet. Upon a question from someone in the audience, Hansen noted that because this is a federal application, it was not in the normal process where people would be automatically notified. He said they would notify people within a certain radius; he noted that renters would not be notified because the property would be listed under the owner' s name. He noted for White that notification could be sent with utility bills but that it would be dependent upon the frequency of the bills. The Mayor pointed out that it is expensive to mail out thick packages to thousands of people, and that when funds are needed for postage, Hansen should request them. The motion to pass Resolution No. 1245 then carried unanimously as follows: The City staff is directed to submit an application to the Army Corps of Engineers prior to June 13 , 1990 for the purchase of Nike Manor for the purpose of providing senior housing in addition to that authorized by the bond issue and to continue to attempt to acquire the property if the initial attempt is not successful . The Mayor pointed out that many suggestions had been made, and Hansen went through the list as follows: * Senior Housing, * Citizens ' Advisory Committee, Move dwellings to an unburdened site, * Use senior housing bond dollars for purchase/development of Nike Manor, * Make available for single parent housing, * Churches and organizations adopt homeless families, * Facility provide resident treatment services, * Use surplus senior housing dollars for homeless, * Social service agencies need to do more educating, * Conduct an impact study **, * Monitor activities over time, * Structured approach, ** Schools, police, social services, * Determine process/schedule, * Move the units to the east hill, * The facility should be closer to commercial and other services. JOHNSON MOVED that the suggestions be referred to the Task Force on Subsidized Housing and that these 8 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor suggestions be incorporated in their findings and Housing recommendations to the Council. Mann seconded. Upon Dowell 's question, Satterstrom noted that this committee is the Mayor' s Committee on Assisted Housing, which is one of the committees that was appointed about a year ago to look at ways in which the City can help to subsidize or create opportunities for assisted housing. He noted that the committee has not been meeting since the senior housing bond issue has been passed. Johnson agreed that the suggestions could be referred to the senior housing committee since the Committee on Assisted Housing is no longer meeting. Ted Smith, 3911 S. 242nd, voiced concern about the safety of his children. He suggested that if the agencies acquire the property, that there be one group who will be accountable, that citizens can go to, who will monitor and have power to enforce rules. Mayor Kelleher expressed his desire that the agencies making application be represented on the senior housing committee. He also suggested that the citizens form a neighborhood advisory committee since they are not represented on that committee, and further that this could be referred to the Planning Commission or some other body so that the process is fair. Jon Johnson asked whether the Mayor could appoint citizens to the committee, and noted that he is not opposed to referring this to the Planning Commission. Orr noted that she serves on the senior housing committee and that most of the committee' s work has been completed. She noted that this may not be the best committee to send the suggestions to. JOHNSON CHANGED HIS MOTION TO MOVE THAT at the Mayor' s suggestion, a neighborhood advisory committee be composed consisting of interested residents. Mann concurred. Dowell said that is an excellent suggestion and complimented the Mayor on bringing it up, since there would be some conflict of interest on the senior committee. The Mayor said that it would help to get timely information to the people who attend the meetings. The Mayor clarified that the motion is to establish a neighborhood advisory committee composed of any resident who wants to participate. The Mayor asked Hansen to circulate a sign-up sheet after the meeting for people who wish to be on the 9 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor committee. Floyd Bacon said the committee is not Housing necessary, that people can attend Council meetings. The motion to establish a committee then carried. The Mayor pointed out that the suggestions made by the citizens tonight will be forwarded to the committee. He also asked that notice of this committee be publicized in upcoming printed material, so that people may become involved. Upon Mann's request, Police Chief Frederiksen noted that the average response time on West Hill is approximately 5 minutes, and that there has been a 36% increase in calls for service in 1989 , due to growth in the area. He said he would check into the claim of a 20-minute response time to a shooting mentioned by Nola Roe. Ms. Jenkins, 24401 35th Ave. S. , asked for the address of the Federal Government so that she can express her desire that the City acquire the property. Upon a question from Frank Pepper, Steve Hansen of the Corps of Engineers, explained that there is a limited time of obligation to provide housing under the McKinney Act and after that time it can be sold. He said that the property is currently being screened for potential uses. Hansen said if the City is not selected to acquire the property, there could be other potential opportunities to acquire it. He said if the property is found suitable for use by an agency, it will be leased for a 1 - 5 year term, and if a decision is made to surplus the property after that time, it would go through the screening process again and be made available to state and local governments. Pepper asked if the Council could control the use of the property, and the City Attorney stated that as long as it remains under the control of the Federal Government, the City has no legal ability to control that. The Mayor noted that the Federal Government is exempt from local zoning laws. Upon a question from Peggy Paulson, the Mayor ordered that the minutes of tonight' s meeting be forwarded to the Federal Government. Upon a question from the audience, Hansen was directed by the Mayor to determine how many applications have been turned in to HHS, and to distribute that information. He also noted that the residents will 10 June 5, 1990 Nike Manor be notified of the outcome by mail, and that there Housing could be another meeting at Sunnycrest. Hansen announced the address of the Corps of Engineers for people who are interested in writing to them: Army Corps of Engineers Real Estate Division Box C - 3755 Seattle, Washington 98124 Sharon Atkin noted for Frank Pepper that each agency is a non-profit type of agency, and that control would be through funding sources. Proclamations (PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1B) Flag Day. Mayor Kelleher read a proclamation declaring June 14 , 1990 as Flag Day in the City of Kent and urged all citizens of Kent to pause at 7: 00 p.m. on this date for the eleventh annual Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and join all Americans in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance to our Flag and Nation. (PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1C) Centennial Celebration. Mayor Kelleher read a proclamation regarding the recent Centennial Celebration and commending several individuals who contributed much time and effort to guarantee the success of the event. He then proclaimed: June 4, 1990 as MIDGE SWELEY Day June 5, 1990 as SALLY STOREY Day June 6, 1990 as VICTORIA RICKERSON Day June 7, 1990 as RAE REITEN Day and the week of June 3 - 91 1990 as NANCY WOO Week in the City of Kent. (PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1D) Employee of the Month. The Mayor announced that Curtis Lutz has been selected as the Employee of the Month for June. He noted that Lutz is a Corrections Sergeant who has been with the City since 1985. He commended Lutz for his communication skills, team 11 June 5, 1990 PUBLIC attitude and dedication, and presented him with the COMMUNICATIONS Employee of the Month plaque. CONSENT WHITE MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through L CALENDAR be approved. Mann seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of May 15, 1990. HEALTH AND (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J) SANITATION Country Hills Apartments. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted by Country Hills Joint Venture (P. Henley and Associates, Inc. ) for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 1, 351 feet of sanitary sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of 132nd Ave. S.E. and Kent-Kangley Rd. for the Country Hills apartment project, and release of cash bond after expiration of the one year maintenance period. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K) Josey Glen Plat. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and warranty agreement submitted by Lakeridge Development Company for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 240 feet of water main extension, 653 feet of sanitary sewer extension, 680 feet of street improvements, and 540 feet of storm sewer improvements constructed in the vicinity of 112th Ave. S .E. and S.E. 232nd for the Josey Glen Plat development, exemption from the one year maintenance period, and immediate release of the cash bond. WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I) Kent Springs Improvements - Phase I ACCEPTANCE as complete of the contract with R.W. Scott for Kent Springs Improvements - Phase I, and release of retainage after receipt of the necessary state releases. (BIDS - ITEM 5K) Cambridge and Reith Road Tank Repaint. Bid opening was May 30 and only two bids were received, both of which exceeded the engineer' s estimate. After 12 June 5, 1990 WATER review of the bids, it was determined the bid documents may have been unclear, leading to higher bids than anticipated. Since only two bids were received and there was a significant difference between these two, and both exceeded the engineer' s estimate, staff recommends that the bids be rejected, the bid documents be amended and clarified, and the project be re-advertised. WHITE SO MOVED, Houser seconded, and the motion carried. STREETS (PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM 2A) LID 330 - 64th Avenue South Street Improvements. The public hearing on confirmation of the final assessment roll has been continued to this date to allow additional time for Corporate Property Investors to evaluate the impact of their final assessment. Public Works Director Wickstrom noted that he had met with Corporate Property Investors and that their concerns have been resolved. Ted Knapp, Union Pacific Realty, stated that they support this LID based on their understanding that the remaining segment between S. 216th and the Puget Power right- of-way will be built in the immediate future. There were no further comments from the audience and the public hearing was closed by motion. WHITE MOVED that the memorandum from the Director of Public Works be made a part of the record, and that Ordinance No. 2925 be adopted confirming the final assessment roll for LID 330. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. (BIDS - ITEM 5G) LID 330 - 64th Avenue South Street Improvements. Bid opening was held April 17 . The low bid was submitted by Robison Construction in the amount of $3, 141, 568.28 . Staff recommends this bid be accepted and WHITE SO MOVED. Houser seconded and the motion carried. TRAFFIC CONTROL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L) Vehicle Registration Fee/Transportation System Improvements - Resolution. APPROVAL of Resolution No. 1246 supporting and requesting that the County implement the vehicle registration fee the State has 13 June 5, 1990 TRAFFIC CONTROL authorized via the gas tax legislation as recommended by the Public Works Committee. (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B) Vision 20-20 - Puget Sound Council of Governments. The Puget Sound Council of Governments (PSCOG) is PSCOG requesting a City Council recommendation of a preferred vision for growth in transportation in the central Puget Sound region. In April, 1990, the PSCOG issued a draft environmental impact statement evaluating five different growth and transportation alternatives: no action, existing plans, major centers, multiple centers, and disperse growth. On May 15, 1990, the Council Planning Committee reviewed the five alternatives and endorsed the multiple centers option. In October, 1990, the PSCOG assembly will select a preferred Vision 20-20 which will guide future regional investments in roads and infrastructure. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt the City Council Planning Committee's recommendation of the PSCOG multiple centers vision for growth in transportation in the central Puget Sound region. Orr seconded and the motion carried. (BIDS - ITEM 5F) West Valley Highway signal Improvements . Bid opening was held May 23 with three bids received. All bids exceed the engineer' s estimate and staff recommends that the bids be rejected, the plans be modified, and the project re-advertised. WHITE SO MOVED, Johnson seconded and the motion carried. SOLID WASTE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) COLLECTION Solid Waste Collection Contract. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a contract with Rabanco Companies extending the contract for collection of solid waste within the City of Kent for nine more months under the existing terms and conditions and rates. ANNEXATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) Mortenson Annexation Initial zoning No. A2-88-2 . AUTHORIZATION to set dates of June 19 and August 7 for public hearings to consider the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation of initial zoning of R1-20 single family residential (20, 000 square foot 14 June 5, 1990 ANNEXATION minimum lot size) for the Mortenson Annexation No. AZ-88-2 . The property is approximately 9 acres in size and is located in the vicinity of 98th Ave. S. and S. 218th Street. PRELIMINARY (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) SUBDIVISION Walnut Grove Preliminary subdivision No. SU-90-2 . This meeting will consider the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation of conditional approval of an application by Kerr-Built, Inc. for a 22-lot single family residential preliminary subdivision. The property is approximately 6. 1 acres in size and is located east of 94th Ave. S. , west of 96th Ave. S. , south of S. 241st Street and north of S. 243rd Street. JOHNSON MOVED to approve the findings of the Hearing Examiner and to adopt the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of approval of the Walnut Grove Preliminary Subdivision No. SU-90-2 with seven conditions. White seconded and the motion carried. HUMAN SERVICES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H) Human Services Roundtable 1990-91 Legislative Agenda. ENDORSEMENT of the 1990-91 Human Services Roundtable Legislative Agenda which contains the Roundtable's priorities for the 1991 biennial session. The Legislative Agenda is developed around the Roundtable's adopted action agenda. POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) Crime Prevention. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of a contribution to the D.A.R.E. program from Hattie and David Dennis. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) Lewd Conduct Ordinance. APPROVAL of Ordinance No. 2926 amending Ordinance 2545, KCC 9. 02 . 34 , relating to lewd conduct by adding language to conform with case law. FIRE (BIDS - ITEM 5A) Hazardous Materials Response Vehicle. Two bids were received on May 8. The bid received from Hackney & Sons, Inc. at $56, 934 plus tax and delivery charge of $2, 500 is within budget and was the low bid submitted. The vehicle meets all specifications, 15 June 5, 1990 FIRE and staff recommends that this bid be accepted. MANN MOVED to award the bid for the Hazardous Materials Response Vehicle to Hackney & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $59,434 plus tax and to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Houser seconded and the motion carried. (BIDS - ITEM 5B) Audio Visual Equipment for all Facilities. Bids were received on May 9 and acceptance is recommended as follows: Photo and Sound Co. $15, 624 . 60 Inland Audio Visual Co. $ 3 ,923 .49 Proline Industries, Inc. $50, 909 .70 MANN MOVED to award the bids as recommended. Houser seconded and the motion carried. (BIDS - ITEM 5C) Aerial Ladder Truck - Bids. Two bids were received on May 11. Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Mays Equipment Company, for a Pierce Aerial Ladder Truck at $408, 645. 03 including tax and options. MANN MOVED to award the bid for the aerial ladder truck as recommended, and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. Houser seconded and the motion carried. (BIDS - ITEM 5D) Furniture for East Hill Public Safety Complex. One bid was received on May 29 for oak furniture from Oaktree Decorating Center in Kent at $18, 149 . 89 including tax and delivery. Staff recommends that this bid be accepted. MANN SO MOVED, Houser seconded and the motion carried. (BIDS -ITEM 5E) General Furnishings for Entire East Hill Complex. Bids were opened on June 4 . Chief Angelo reviewed the bids and recommended that the bids for furnishings for the East Hill Complex be awarded to: Commercial Office Interiors in the amount of $40, 204 . 53 ; Treadwell 's Office Products in the amount of $26, 555. 85; Western Office Furniture in the amount of $12 , 456.83 and finally Business Interiors Northwest in the amount of $8 , 373 .43 . 16 June 5, 1990 FIRE MANN SO MOVED, White seconded and the motion carried. SURPLUS (BIDS - ITEM 5I) EQUIPMENT Surplus Telemetry. Surplus water and sewer telemetry equipment was advertised for sale with bid opening on May 16. Only one bid was received for the water telemetry equipment and no bids were received for the sewer telemetry equipment. Staff recommends the bid received from Arrera Engineering for the surplus water telemetry equipment in the amount of $2 ,972 .75 be accepted and that the sewer telemetry equipment be scrapped. WHITE SO MOVED, Houser seconded and the motion carried. EQUIPMENT (BIDS - ITEM 5H) RENTAL Radial Camera. Three bids were received with the low bid submitted by CUES, Inc. in the amount of $26,916. 90. Staff recommends that this bid be accepted. WHITE SO MOVED. Mann seconded. Upon White's question, Wickstrom noted that this equipment will be used for sewers. Motion carried. (BIDS - ITEM 5J) Riding Mower. Four bids were received for the purchase of a riding lawnmower, with a low bid submitted by Western Equipment in the amount of $10,885.40. However, they have indicated that they will be unable to deliver the equipment as bid. Therefore, staff recommends the purchase be awarded to the second low bidder, Superior Turf, in the amount of $11, 519 . 95. WHITE MOVED that the bid submitted by Superior Turf in the amount of $11,519.95 be accepted for the purchase of a riding lawnmower. Houser seconded and the motion carried. COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) Council Absence. AUTHORIZATION to excuse Councilmember Woods from the June 5 meeting as she will be attending the dedication of the Green River College in Japan. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through May 31, 1990 after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 4 : 30 p.m. on June 12 , 1990. 17 June 5, 1990 FINANCE Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 5/16 - 5/30 92001 - 92042 $ 346, 034 .57 5/31/90 92043 - 92664 957 , 199 . 80 $1, 303 , 234 .37 Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers Amount 5/18/90 135667 - 136375 $ 832 , 991. 11 REPORTS (REPORTS - ITEM 6C) Public Works Committee. White noted that he had recently attended a National League of Cities conference in San Jose, as a member of the Transportation and Communications Steering Committee. He noted that they had addressed the restructuring of the cable TV industry, and that hearings are being held and legislation drafted on this issue. He said they had also discussed an airport passenger facility charge, which would be charged passengers leaving airports. He said the maximum fee would be $3 . 00, and that the money would be used to build additional airports and support facilities. Also discussed was the 1991 9 cents-a- gallon Federal gas tax. The committee had recommended that the money be channeled back to the local level to be used for transportation needs. He said they also recommended that no additional Federal taxes be enacted which will be used for anything other than transportation needs. (REPORTS - ITEM 6F) Parks Committee. Dowell noted that the Parks Committee will meet at 4 : 00 p.m. on Wednesday, June 20, in the Courtroom at City Hall . ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9 : 15 p.m. Marie Je s , CMC City Cler 18 Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 , 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE - MIDWAY HOUSING 2. SUMMARY STATEEM: As recommended by the Public Works Committee, authorization to modify the contract with the Department of the Army to include sanitary sewer service to the Midway family housing units. 3 . EXHIBITS: Material from Public Works Committee meeting of 6/5/90; letter from Department of the Army. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds f " DISCUSSION: ACTION• �J Council Agenda Item No. 3C City of Kent, Washington Kent Public Works Committee Date June 5 , 1990 Category 1. SUBJECT: Contract Modification - Sanitary Sewer Service - Midway Housing Department of the Army 2. SUMMARY' I STATEMENT: The Department of the Army has requested a modification of their contract with the City to include sanitary sewer service to their Midway Family Housing units. Even though their existing contract does not include sanitary sewer service, they have been paying for same. This action is necessary to bring their records and paperwork up to date. 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter from Department of the Army 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Don Wickstrom 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO x YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended_ 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: CITY OF (SENT � � DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY HEADQUARTERS, I CORPS ANO FORT LEWIS APR 3 0 1990 FORT LEWIS, WASHINGTON 98433.5000 ENGINEERING DEPT. T"ILY TO TTEN TION OF. April 23 , 1990 •4i'�n,.,,p x^'�+ Directorate of Contracting City of Kent 220 4th Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032-5895 Gentlemen: Reference Contract Number DAKF57-74-C-0386 for Water Service, Midway Family Housing, Midway, Washington. .11 The enclosed Modification Number P00010 has been prepared to incorporate sewage service into the contract. This modification shall consolidate water and sewage service under one contract. The modification has already been reviewed and approved for signature by Headquarters. It is requested that no changes be made to these documents. Should you have any questions regarding this modification, they should be addressed under separate cover for evaluation and reply by our personnel . If you do not have any questions, please sign the original and two (2) copies and return to the Directorate of Contracting, Building 9504 , Fort Lewis Logistics Center, Fort Lewis, Washington 98433-5000 . Retain one (1) copy for your suspense file. After signature by the Contracting Officer, a fully executed copy will be mailed to you for your records. For additional information contact Olive Lenney, Contract Administrator, at (206) 967-2151, extension 248 . Sincerely, R. S . Anderson Contracting Officer Enclosure .............. Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19. 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: I.A.C. GRANT APPLICATION - GREEN RIVER TRAIL PARK - RESOLUTION 2 . SUMKARY STATEKENT: The Parks Department seeks authorization to apply to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for matching acquisition funds for the Green River Trail Park. The application will be for $300, 000, to be matched by $300,000 from King County Open Space Bond Issue proceeds. 3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution; fiscal notes J, 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Internal Budad't Committee (Committee, Staff, Examine , Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISgWPERSO tL I ACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Ro6commended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRE $300,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: K' a County Open Space Bond Issue proceeds 7. CITY COUNCIL =ION: (;; Councilmember movej, l secol�}}ds e w1t+� c, that Resolution No. )q be adopted authorizing application for funding from the State Interagency for Outdoor Recreation Committee for the Green River Trail Park. DISCUSSION: rk ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4A MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- s tiject: IAC GRANT APPLICATION - FISCAL NOTE l..eator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 06/12/90 at 1524 . THE PARK DEPARTMENT IS SEEKING COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR MATCHING •FUNDS FOR THREE PROJECTS: LAKE FENWICK PARK ACQUISITION, GREEN RIVER TRAIL PARK, AND EAST HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK. THE MATCHING FUNDS REQUEST IS BEING MADE TO THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION (IAC) . FOR THE LAKE FENWICK AND GREEN RIVER PROJECTS, THE CITY'S MATCH WILL BE FROM THE KING COUNTY OPEN SPACE BOND PROCEEDS WHICH IS ALREADY FUNDED. FOR THE EAST HILL PARK PROJECT, THE CITY'S MATCH OF $400,000 WILL COME FROM $500, 000 BUDGETED FOR EAST HILL PARK. $300, 000 WAS BUDGETED IN 1988 AND AN ADDITIONAL $200,000 WAS BUDGETED IN 1990. THE PARK DEPARTMENT REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES A WAIVER OF RETROACTIVITY REQUESTING THAT THE CITY BE ABLE TO EXPEND FUNDS PRIOR TO THE DECISION ON WHETHER MATCHING FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE. SINCE THE CITY HAS ALREADY AUTHORIZED THESE PROJECTS AND HAS THEM FUNDED TO THE EXTENT OF AVAILABLE FUNDS, RECEIPT OF MATCHING FUNDS ONLY ENHANCES THE PROJECTS. THE APPLICATION IS THUS SUPPORTED BY THE IBC. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, authorizing applications for funding assistance for an outdoor recreation project to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation as provided by the Marine Recreation Land Act. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent has approved a "Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan" for the urban area which identifies a community park on Green River in the southeastern part of the City; and, WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Marine Recreation Land Act, state and federal funding assistance has been authorized and made available to aid in financing the cost of land for parks and the construction of outdoor recreation facilities of local public bodies; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent considers it in the best public interest to acquire 11.2 acres in the bend of the Green River adjacent to the Green River Trail. Tax lots 2522049001 and 2422049108; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the mayor be authorized to make formal application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for funding assistance, Section 2. That any fund assistance so received be used in the acquisition of 11.2 acres of land in the southeastern part of the City of Kent, Washington. Section 3. That the City's share of the project will be derived from King County Open Space Bond Issue proceeds. Section 4. The City of Kent does hereby certify that the City is responsible to support all non-cash commitments to the local share should they not materialize. section 5. That any property acquired with financial aid through the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation be placed in use as an outdoor recreation facility and be retained in such use in perpetuity unless as otherwise provided and agreed to by the City Council, the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation, and any affected federal agency, and Section 6. That this resolution become part of a formal application to the Interagency Committee for outdoor Recreation. Section 7. That adequate notification has been given an opportunity for public input and that published notices have identified affected flood plains and/or wetlands, if applicable. Section S. That the City of Kent does certify that the City is or has taken steps to become owner of the land to be developed and based on current knowledge, provides assurance there are no encumbrances on the land which would restrict recreation use of the land as proposed in this application. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this day of 1990. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1990. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY 2 - 4I� Kent City Council Meeting p/r Date June 19 . 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: I.A.C. GRANT APPLICATION - LAKE FENWICK PARK - RESOLUTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMM: The Parks Department seeks authorization to apply to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recration for matching acquisition funds for Lake Fenwick Park. The application will be for $350,000, to be matched by $350,000 from King County Open Space Bond Issue proceeds. i 3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution; fiscal node 4. RECOMMENDED BY: interial Bu et Committee (Committee, Staff, Exami r, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL-NOTE: ecommended Not Recommended r 6. EXPENDI Ift $350, 000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: County Open S ace .Bond Issue iproceeds 7. CITY COUNCIL A Councilmember move, C seconds q w. Cfa that Resolution No. �� be adopted authorizing applica ion for funding from the State Interagency for Outdoor Recreation Committee for Lake Fenwick Park. —�_ —_ DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4B MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- S»bject: IAC GRANT APPLICATION - FISCAL NOTE c ator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 06/12/90 at 1524 . THE PARK DEPARTMENT IS SEEKING COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR MATCHING FUNDS FOR THREE PROJECTS: LAKE FENWICK PARK ACQUISITION, GREEN RIVER TRAIL PARK, AND EAST HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK. THE MATCHING FUNDS REQUEST IS BEING MADE TO THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION (IAC) . FOR THE LAKE FENWICK AND GREEN RIVER PROJECTS, THE CITY'S MATCH WILL BE FROM THE KING COUNTY OPEN SPACE BOND PROCEEDS WHICH IS ALREADY FUNDED. FOR THE EAST HILL PARK PROJECT, THE CITY'S MATCH OF $400, 000 WILL COME FROM $500, 000 BUDGETED FOR EAST HILL PARK. $300, 000 WAS BUDGETED IN 1988 AND AN ADDITIONAL $200, 000 WAS BUDGETED IN 1990. THE PARK DEPARTMENT REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES A WAIVER OF RETROACTIVITY REQUESTING THAT THE CITY BE ABLE TO EXPEND FUNDS PRIOR TO THE DECISION ON WHETHER MATCHING FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE. SINCE THE CITY HAS ALREADY AUTHORIZED THESE PROJECTS AND HAS THEM FUNDED TO THE EXTENT OF AVAILABLE FUNDS, RECEIPT OF MATCHING FUNDS ONLY ENHANCES THE PROJECTS. THE APPLICATION IS THUS SUPPORTED BY THE IBC. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, authorizing applications for funding assistance for an outdoor recreation project to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation as provided by the Marine Recreation Land Act. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent as approved a "Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan" for the urban area which identifies a community park on Lake Fenwick in the western part of the city; and, WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Marine Recreation Land Act, state and federal funding assistance has been authorized and made available to aid in financing the cost of land for parks and the construction of outdoor recreational facilities of local public bodies; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent considers it in the best public interest to acquire 12 acres of lakefront property to compliment existing Lake Fenwick Park and link the park to other City owned property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Mayor be authorized to make formal application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for funding assistance. Section 2. That any fund assistance so received be used in the acquisition of twelve (12) acres of land in the western part of the City of Kent, Washington. Section 3. That the City's share of the project will be derived from King County Open Space Bond Issue proceeds. Section 4. The City of Kent does hereby certify that the City is responsible to support all non-cash commitments to the local share should they not materialize. Section 5. That any property acquired with financial aid through the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation be placed in use as an outdoor recreation facility and be retained' in such use in perpetuity unless as otherwise provided and agreed to by the City Council, the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation, and any affected federal agency, and section 6. That this resolution become part of a formal application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation. Section 7. That adequate notification has been given an opportunity provided for public input and that published notices have identified affected flood plains and/or wetlands, if applicable. Section 8. That the City of Kent does certify that the City is or has taken steps to become owner of the land to be developed and based on current knowledge, provides assurance there are no encumbrances on the land which would restrict recreation use of the land as proposed in this application. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this _ day of 1990. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1990. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY 2 ............... . Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 . 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: I.A.C. GRANT APPLICATION - EAST HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK - RESOLUTION 2. SUMMARY STATEKENT: The Parks Department seeks authorization to apply to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recration for matching acquisition and development funds for an East Hill Neighborhood Park. The application will be for $400, 000, to be matched by $400, 000 from the 1990 C.I.P. budget. 3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution; fiscal note 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: internal Budaet Co ittee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Co ission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED S ERSONNEL ACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Reco nded Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: 4 0 000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1990 C I P budget i r 7. CITY COUNCIL A N• . Councilmember bA,9 move9, Councilmember � seconds, that Resolution No. /17110 be adopted authorizing application for funding assistance from the State Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for an East Hill Neighborhood Park. !� - DISCUSSION• 7-5�7 A ACTION• % f Council Agenda Item No. 4C MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- Subject: IAC GRANT APPLICATION - FISCAL NOTE C stor: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 06/12/90 at 1524 . THE PARK DEPARTMENT IS SEEKING COUNCIL AUTHORIZATION TO APPLY FOR MATCHING FUNDS FOR THREE PROJECTS: LAKE FENWICK PARK ACQUISITION, GREEN RIVER TRAIL PARK, AND EAST HILL NEIGHBORHOOD PARK. THE MATCHING FUNDS REQUEST IS BEING MADE TO THE INTERAGENCY COMMITTEE FOR OUTDOOR RECREATION (IAC) . FOR THE LAKE FENWICK AND GREEN RIVER PROJECTS, THE CITY'S MATCH WILL BE FROM THE KING COUNTY OPEN SPACE BOND PROCEEDS WHICH IS ALREADY FUNDED. FOR THE EAST HILL PARK PROJECT, THE CITY'S MATCH OF $400, 000 WILL COME FROM $500, 000 BUDGETED FOR EAST HILL PARK. $300, 000 WAS BUDGETED IN 1988 AND AN ADDITIONAL $200, 000 WAS BUDGETED IN 1990. THE PARK DEPARTMENT REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES A WAIVER OF RETROACTIVITY REQUESTING THAT THE CITY BE ABLE TO EXPEND FUNDS PRIOR TO THE DECISION ON WHETHER MATCHING FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE. SINCE THE CITY HAS ALREADY AUTHORIZED THESE PROJECTS AND HAS THEM FUNDED TO THE EXTENT OF AVAILABLE FUNDS, RECEIPT OF MATCHING FUNDS ONLY ENHANCES THE PROJECTS. THE APPLICATION IS THUS SUPPORTED BY THE IBC. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, authorizing applications for funding assistance for an outdoor recreation project to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation as provided by the Marine Recreation Land Act. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent as approved a "Comprehensive Park and Recreation Plan" for the urban area which identifies a community park on East Hill in the eastern part of the City; and WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Marine Recreation Land Act, state and federal funding assistance has been authorized and made available to aid in financing the cost of land for parks and the construction of outdoor recreational facilities of local public bodies; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Kent considers it in the best public interest to acquire and develop a community park on the East Hill of the City generally located north of S.E. 248th St. east of 108 Ave. S.E. and inside the eastern city limits; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Mayor be authorized to make formal application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation for funding assistance, Section 2. That any fund assistance so received be used in the acquisition and development of 4.63 acres of land in the eastern part of the City of Kent, Washington. Section 3. That the City's share of the project will be derived from CIP budget. Section 4. The City of Kent does hereby certify that the City is responsible to support all non-cash commitments to the local share should they not materialize. W Section 5. That any property acquired with financial aid through the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation be placed in use as an outdoor recreation facility and be retained in such use in perpetuity unless as otherwise provided and agreed to by the City Council, the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation, and any affected federal agency, and §jgtjon 6. That this resolution become part of a formal application to the Interagency Committee for Outdoor Recreation. Section 7. That adequate notification has been given an opportunity provided for public input and that published notices have identified affected flood plains and/or wetlands, if applicable. Section_8. That the City of Kent does certify that the City is or has taken steps to become owner of the land to be developed and based on current knowledge, provides assurance there are no encumbrances on the land which would restrict recreation use of the land as proposed in this application. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the •• City of Kent, Washington this day of 1990. Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1990- DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY 2 . ........ Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 . 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: SECRETARIAL POSITION FOR KING COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 37 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: It will not be necessary for King County Fire District No. 37 to institute a service benefit charge at this time. This will allow the Fire District to put additional revenues toward services as provided for per their contract. Along with the recent hiring of firefighters, their next priority was to provide some additional support staff to allow them to meet district priorities. Fire Chief Norm Angelo and the Commissioners of King County Fire District No. 37 request that the hiring of an OT II secretarial position in Fire Administration be authorized. This matter has been reviewed and. recommended by the Public Safety Committee. , Aeiye[o Ctctr-�_�e� 41vcr -die costs vu �t r�ci- Vie pa;d im ffle �-4"? This item is included as Other Business rather than Consent Calendar as a quorum was not present at the June 12 operations Committee meeting. 3. EXHIBITS: Executive summary 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo, Fire Chief: Commissioners of Fire District No 37 . Operations Committee; Public S fety Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, eto: ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: " YES _ FISCALIPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended NO" YES Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $24 it inclu "s wacFes and benefits for the remainder of 1990 office furnitlure typewriter and computer. Additional revenue will be paid to the City of Kent by Kin County Fire District No 37 in 1 90 to more than sufficiently cover the above cost and ongointr salary/benefit costs. SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember � moved, Councilmember Xlf;t seconds to authorize the hiring of an OT II secretarial position in Fire Administration for Fire District No. 37. DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4D MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- F kage. Dated: 06/01/90 at 1225. Strtject: HIRING SECRETARY WITH FD #37 FUNDS - FISCAL NOTE Creator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Contents: 1. Part 1. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT PREPARED A REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL SECRETARY POSITION, OFFICE FURNITURE, UNIFORMS AND PC. THEY ALSO REQUESTED A VEHICLE, AND MOBILE RADIO. THE REQUEST TOTALLED $45, 064 AND WAS PROPOSED TO BE FUNDED FROM ADDITIONAL FIRE DISTRICT 37 FUNDS AND DELAYED HIRING OF SOME POSITIONS. THE 1990 BUDGET INCLUDED ADDITIONAL FIRE DISTRICT REVENUE OF $768,341 TO FUND 14 NEW POSITONS. THE DISTRICT RESERVED AN AMOUNT TO COVER THE POSSIBLE IMPACT OF THE 106% MAXIMUM LEVY WITH THE INCORPORATION OF SEA-TAC & FEDERAL WAY. A NEW STATE LAW PROTECTS FIRE DISTRICT LEVYS WHICH HAS FREED UP THE RESERVE OF $38, 482 . IF THE FUNDS HAD BEEN FREED UP IN DECEMBER, THE POSITION WHICH WAS IDENTIFIED AS A PRIORITY OF THE FIRE DISTRICT WOULD HAVE BEEN FUNDED IN THE 1990 BUDGET. BASED ON THIS, THE IBC RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF A BUDGET CHANGE OF $38 , 482 TO ADD REVENUE FROM FIRE DISTRICT 37 AND FUND A ONE YEAR SECRETARY (OTII) POSITION, UNIFORMS, OFFICE FURNITURE AND A PERSONAL COMPUTER. THE IPC HAS ALSO REVIEWED THE POSITION AND RECOMMENDS APPROVAL. FIRE DISTRICT 37 REVENUE WILL CONTINUE IN 1991 TO FUND THE ON GOING POSITION COSTS. T' IBC DOES NOT RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE VEHICLE AND MOBILE RADIO WHICH WERE G.,...<ELATED TO THE FIRE DISTRICT LEVY. CONSISTENT WITH OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS, THE IBC IS NOT RECOMMENDING USING FUND BALANCE FOR NON EMERGENCY ITEMS OUT OF THE BUDGET CYCLE. THE REQUEST FOR THESE ITEMS SHOULD BE RESUBMITTED FOR THE 1991 BUDGET PROCESS . r City of Kent, Washington Kent Public Safety Committee Date: June 4, 1990 1. SUBJECT: Hiring Secretarial Position for King County Fire District #37. 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: It will not be necessary for King County Fire District #37 to institute a service benefit charge at this time. This will allow the Fire District to put additional revenues toward services as provided for per their contract. Along with the recent hiring of firefighters, their next priority was to provide some additional support staff to allow them to meet some District priorities. 3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo, Fire Chief; Commissioners of King County Fire District #37 . 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: No xxxx Yes FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended xxx Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $24 , 111 includes wages and benefits for remainder of 1990, office furniture, typewriter and computer. Additional revenue will be paid to the City of Kent by King County Fire District #37 in 1990 to more than sufficiently cover the above costs, and on-going salary/benefit costs. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that this matter be placed on the Consent Calendar of June 5, 1990 Council Meeting for approval to hire an OT II secretarial position in Fire Administration for King County Fire District #37. kj EXECUTIVE SUMMARY MAY 24 , 1990 TO: CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS JUDY WOODS, JON JOHNSON, JIM WHITE, PAUL MANN, CHRISTI HOUSER, STEVE DOWELL AND LEONA ORR FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF A bcl SUBJECT: HIRING OF ADDITIONAL SECRETARIAL POSITION ---------------------------------------------------------------- Background: In compliance with the contract between the City and Fire District #37, the District was able to hire personnel based upon additional revenue that they had generated through the lid lift. Per the contract, the additional funds needed were determined by computation of Commissioner expenses and then by applying the standard formula. Under the contract, it was initially projected that only 14 personnel could be hired. Part of the Commissioner expenses were based on the fact that the District was going to have to pursue a service charge if they were going to generate sufficient funds to maintain existing personnel in 1991. The concern about a service charge was based upon the projected conflict in the maximum allowed levy rate for the County. Due to incorporation of Sea-Tac and Federal Way, and the 106% rule, it appeared evident that significant proration might happen to fire district levies. In early 1990, after the District budget had been set, several events changed this potential impact. A new state law protected more of the fire district levy, the total maximum county levy was increased and the County conducted a re-evaluation of the County's assessed valuation. All of these wiped out the threat of pro- ration. It is no longer necessary to pursue the service charge at this time. The net result was that the Commissioners had freed up funds from their expenses to cover an additional position. Therefore, they have requested consideration of their next priority. The Commissioners feel a need to expedite some District related projects and correspondence with the public. Given the overall logistics, complexity and volume of the operational tasks of the department, the secretary position budgeted in the City budget will give some overdue help to the Fire Administration staff, but it can not meet the full routine operational needs. The city position will not be filled until after the Bond Projects are complete (late 1990) , yet current staff is in extreme overload. Further, the city position would not allow us to address the Commissioners needs as they had previously requested. While the initial funds did not originally allow them to address this priority, the Commissioners now find themselves in a position to do so after freeing up funds from their expenses. Recommendation: Per our contractual obligation and given the additional funds generated: $38,482 from the Commissioners expenses; their agreement to delay the hiring of two (2) replacement recruits for the District for at least four (4) months in the amount of $23,218 ; funds to activate the new station and staff, $48, 346; and additional non-projected revenue funds sent to the City in March, 1990 $52,264 ; we are recommending to hire the following position with the listed one time and ongoing costs: One Time Cost 1 - Desk with return 750 1 - Steno chair 250 1 - Typewriter 550 1 - Personal computer w/software and maintenance agreement 71600 Sub Total $9, 150 On-going Costs 1 - OT II Secretarial Position 14 , 211 (7 months wages/benefits) (Annual wage/benefit = $27 , 845) 1 - Uniforms/Miscellaneous 750 Sub Total $14,961 GRAND TOTAL: $24, 111. 00 Significance: The position would provide means to deal with Commissioners needs and with administrative work load that can not be handled through the other budgeted positions. There are sufficient funds generated from the Fire District with no impact to the City budget. Budget Impact: All costs offset by additional funds provided, and the delay in hiring of recruits. Cost of $26, 142 has no fiscal impact on City due to offsetting revenues. Alternatives: 1. Per contract, City has agreement to provide position and equipment when funds are provided. However, the City could let the District keep the money, hire the person and purchase the necessary equipment. Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 , 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: HVAC DELIVERY SYSTEM CLEANING 2. SUMKARY STATEMENT: Authorization is requested for the Mayor to sign a contract with Advanced Cleaning Services for cleaning of the City Hall heating, ventilation, and air conditioning delivery systems after review by the City Attorney. The amount of the contract is $6,480 plus applicable taxes, and was budgeted in the 1990 Budget. This item is included as Other Business rather than Consent Calendar as a quorum was not present at the June 12 Operations Committee meeting. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo fro Customer Services Manager. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Fina ce Department (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL P ONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCWPERSONNEL NOTE. Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: 6 480 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1990 P blic Office BuildingBud et 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember move4, \c&ndi mem�r seconds .� + d that the Mayor be authorized to sign a contract with Advanced Cleaning Services for cleaning of City Hall heating, ventilation, and air conditioning delivery systems in the amount of $6,480. DISCUSSION• ACTION: 1 Council Agenda Item No. 4E MEMO June 6, 1990 TO: Operations Committee Members 1 FROM: Charlie Lindsey, Customer Services Ma a SUBJECT: HVAC Delivery Systems Cleaning Request authorization for the Mayor to sign a contract with Advanced Cleaning Services, after review by the attorneys, for cleaning of City Halls HVAC delivery systems in the amount of $6, 480. 00 plus applicable taxes. This item is in the 1990 budget. Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 . 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: BROKERED NATURAL GAS USF( TAX AGREEMENT AN 9 ORDINANCE ut i o a � 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: � Request uV doption of Ordinance 1� and authorization for the Mayor t sign a contract with the State for collection of the gas u lity use tax and transmission to the State following deduction of a surcharge as spelled out in the contract. The attac d memos from City staff and the State describe a process for taining the equivalent of the gas utility tax on gas us within the City of Kent but purchased outside the State of ashington. This item was brought to the attention of the C' y following passage of a law in a recent legislative sessi that provides a means for the City to obtain the equivalent o the City's utility tax on gas purchase5outside of the State. This item is ncluded as Other Business rather than Consent Calendar as a quorum was not present at the June 12 Operations Committee eeting. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memo from Finance Director; letter from Department of Revenue; Agreement; Ordinance; Ordinance 2758 . ,.... 4. RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT- NO_ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACT ON: 4. Councilmember moves, Councilmembe seconds — to adopt OrdinanceA921 and authorize the Mayor to sign a--- contract with the State of Washington for collect of / ' natural gas use tax and transmission of same to DISCUSSION• ACTION• �- Council Agenda Item No. 4F MEMORANDUM TO: Operations Committee FROM: Tony McCarthy,%\nance Director DATE: June 5, 1990 SUBJECT: Brokered Natural Gas Use Tax Attached is a draft ordinance entitling the City to Kent to their full share of a new brokered natural gas use tax. In 1985 large industrial users of natural gas were permitted to buy their natural gas supply in other states and just pay a transportation fee to the local distribution company (LDC) thus removing the transaction from the city' s utility tax. The exact figure the city is losing from this issue in unknown but Kent is listed as a city that has companies purchasing their natural gas in other states. The LDC will be required to file quarterly reports as to specific customers purchasing brokered natural gas. The city brokered gas use tax will always be equal to the city utility tax with is currently 3 . 5% and the Department of Revenue will administer this new tax. The city attorney office has prepared a agreement and ordinance implementing the brokered natural gas use tax which will be effective July 1, 1990 . RZ,4{TAi`O� OTn D. I. OKAMOTC7 o" Director (206) 753-5540 FAX (206) 586-5543 STATE OF WASHINGTON _F DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE Olympia, Washington 98504-0090 MS-AX-02 Brokered Natural Gas Use Tax April 27 , . 1990 The information below explains Substitute House Bill 1574 . The intent of the bill is for cities to receive their full entitlement for use tax . The Department of Revenue will administer the new tax which takes effect July 1 , 1990 . If you . have questions after reading the information which follows , you may contact Julie Japhet at ( 206) 753-5546 . History Until 1985 , large industrial users of natural gas had no choice but to buy their gas supply .: from the local distribution company (LDC) serving their plant . All such purchases from the LDC were subject to the state public utility tax plus any city utility C� tax. In 1985 , the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) passed its Rule 436 (subsequently amended by Rule 500) . This decision allows major purchasers of natural gas to buy their gas supply directly from producers or brokers in other states . Interstate pipelines and LDC ' s are then paid a "transportation fee" for delivering the gas to the customer ' s plant via their pipelines . The overwhelming majority of such "brokered natural gas" purchases take place out of state . The gas purchase is not paid for bv_ the LDC . These two conditions remove the transaction from both the state and city utility taxes which are taxes on the gross revenue of the gas utility. Since no other tax applies , these transactions fall into the state use tax which is set at 6 . 5% plus local additions . The effect of this is an unanticipated windfall to the state at the direct expense of city governments . This has been a particular hardship for smaller cities with large gas customers . However, even major cities such as Seattle and Bellevue have felt the impact . Use Tax Public Utility State 6 . 5% 3 . 852% Local 1 . 6% (max) 6 . 000% (max) Total 8 . 1% 9 . 852% L page two - The natural gas industry, the large industrial customers , the Department of Revenue and the cities agreed to a plan to return the tax structure to the same situation prior to FERC 436 via Senate House Bill (SHB) 1574 . SHB 1574 created a special category for state and city use tax applicable to only brokered gas transactions . The tax rate for each tax is set to equal the equivalent utility tax; i . e . , the state brokered gas use tax will always be equal to the state public utility tax rate and �the' 'city `brokered gas use -tax ,.will. 7alwaW be ''.equal `to° tfie city utility tax. < As an additional benefit to the state , the natural gas LDC ' s have agreed to file quarterly reports with DOR as to the specific customers purchasing brokered natural gas . Prior to this reporting mechanism, DOR has been unable to collect a substantial portion of the existing use tax since it was unaware of the gas _. customers that are using this option. The effect of SHB 1574 is to return the lost revenue to the cities , facilitate the state ' s collection of the taxes it is rightfully due and clarify the tax liability of the LDC ' s and their major customers . Parameters The city use tax for brokered natural gas is to be imposed at the same rate in effect for the tax on natural gas businesses under RCW 35 . 21 . 970 . The effective date for this new law is July 1 , 1990 . Resolutions , or ordinances , should probably be timed to be effective as of July 1 , 1990 , which is the date that SHB 1574 becomes effective . Administration Contract The collection and administration of this law is to be performed by the Department of Revenue . A contract is enclosed which includes a fee of 2 .0%. The tax will be collected through the use of quarterly returns . The Department plans to transfer monies to the State Treasurer on a monthly basis for those months in which monies are received. I page three - Deadline The ordinance , or resolution , and the signed administration contract should be sent to the Department by July 1 , 1990 . The address is : Department of Revenue Miscellaneous Tax Division, MS : AX-02 General Administration Building Olympia, WA 98504 Attn: Bill Chamberland Known Consumers We have received from the gas companies a list of consumers that . have had brokered natural gas delivered during the last year or two . After reviewing the service addresses , we found companies in the cities listed below. These cities are not guaranteed revenue from this tax , nor are other cities precluded from revenue from this tax. These are just the cities of record for the last couple of years . Cities with Brokered Natural Gas Customers in the Recent Past Algona Pullman Bellevue Renton Camas Seattle Cheney Spokane College Place Tacoma Connell Tukwilla Everett Tumwater Ferndale Vancouver Kent Walla Walla Medical Lake Washougal Millwood Wenatchee Othello Yakima AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND THE CITY OF KENT REGARDING ADMINISTRATION AND COLLECTION OF LOCAL NATURAL GAS USE TAX THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 199_, by and between the State of Washington, Department of Revenue, hereinafter referred to as the Department, and the City of Kent, hereinafter referred to as the City, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Washington has by chapter 384, Laws of 1989, authorized cities to impose a local natural gas use tax; and WHEREAS, the City of Kent has by Ordinance No. a copy of which is attached hereto, elected to impose a natural gas use tax commencing on the first day of July, 1990; and WHEREAS, it is provided in section 2 of said State act and in KCC 3.50.050 (Kent City Ordinance ) , by reference to RCW 82.14.050, that any city imposing a local natural gas use tax by ordinance shall , prior to the effective date thereof, contract with the Department for the administration and collection of said tax; NOW, THEREFORE, to effectuate the provisions of KCC 3.50.050 and section 2 of the aforementioned State act, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. The Department shall exclusively perform all functions incident to the administration and collection of the taxes imposed by the said ordinance, other than criminal prosecutions. 2. The Department shall retain from the taxes so collected the amount of two percent thereof as expenses of administration and collection. Said amount shall be subject to review during October of each year. 3. The remainder of said taxes so collected shall be deposited by the Department in the local sales and use tax account under the custody of the State Treasurer. 4. In carrying out its administration and collection duties hereunder, the Department shall , insofar as the same are applicable, apply the administrative provisions contained in chapters 82.02 and 82.32 RCW, and the Department's rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to RCW 82.32.300, as the same exist or may hereafter be amended. The Department shall adopt additional rules and regulations, in accordance with the State Administrative Procedure Act, to facilitate the administration and collection of the local taxes as it may deem necessary or desirable. 5. The Department shall perform its duties hereunder so that as far as possible the local natural gas use tax adopted by the City shall be administered and collected in a manner which is as consistent and uniform as possible with the state natural gas use tax and facilitates the imposition of the local natural gas use tax upon individual taxable events simultaneously with the imposition of the state natural gas use tax. 6. The City shall have the right from time to time to examine the records of the Department as they concern taxpayers subject to the aforementioned ordinance. 7. The allocation of local natural gas use tax collections among the various cities and counties will be sent by the Department to the State Treasurer within 60 days after the close of the first quarter for which the tax is imposed and thereafter on a monthly basis. 8. All refunds and credits for local natural gas use tax made by the Department shall be charged to the City. 9. The Department shall require redistribution to the affected cities, of any tax, penalty and interest distributed to a city other than the city entitled thereto. Such redistribution shall not be made as to amounts originally distributed earlier than three quarterly periods prior to the quarterly period in which the Department obtains knowledge of the improper distribution. - 2 - I.. 10. This agreement shall take effect on the 1st day of July, 1990, and - shall thereafter be automatically renewed on December 31 of each year unless one of the parties gives written notice of termination on or before November 1 of each such year. 11. In witness whereof the parties hereto have affixed their signature the day and year first above written. CITY OF KENT By: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE STATE OF WASHINGTON By: DIRECTOR Approved: SANDRA DRISCOLL KENT CITY ATTORNEY 6068L-3L - 3 - ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to the taxation of utilities and natural gas, adding a new Chapter 3.50 to the Kent City Code. WHEREAS, due to a change in the federal regulations governing the sale of brokered natural gas, cities have lost significant revenues from the utility tax on natural gas; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature passed Substitute House Bill No. 1574, Chapter 384 of the 1989 Regular Session Laws, with the intent to adjust the utility and use tax authority of cities to maintain this revenue source for the municipalities and to provide equality of taxation between intrastate and interstate transactions; and WHEREAS, the provisions of Substitute House Bill No. 1574, Chapter 384 of the 1989 Regular Session Laws, added a new section to Chapter 82.14 of the RCWs to allow the governing body of any city to by ordinance fix and impose upon every person a use tax for the privilege of using natural gas or manufactured gas in the city as a consumer; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 3.50 is added to the Kent City Code as follows: 3.50,010. NATURAL OR MANUFACTURED GAS LINE USE TAX IMPOSED. There is hereby levied and there shall be collected from every person in this City a use tax for the privilege of using natural gas or manufactured gas within the City as a consumer, effective July 1, 1990. 3,50,020. RATE. The tax shall be imposed in an amount equal to the value of the article used by the taxpayer multiplied by the rate in effect for the tax on the natural gas businesses under RCW 35.21.870 within the City of Kent (Kent City Code 3.04.040(1) (H)) . The "value of the article used" does not include any amounts that are paid for the hire or use of a natural gas business in transporting the gas subject to tax under this subsection if those amounts are subject to tax under RCW 35.21.870. 3,50,030. EXEMPTIONS. The tax imposed under this section shall not apply to the use of natural or manufactured gas if the person who sold the gas to the consumer has paid a tax under RCW 35.21.870 with respect to the gas for which exemption is sought under this subsection. 3.50.040. CREDITS. There shall be a credit against the tax levied under this section in an amount equal to any tax paid by: 1. The person who sold the gas to the consumer when that tax is a gross receipts tax similar to that imposed pursuant to RCW 35.21.870 by another state with respect to the gas for which a credit is sought under this subsection; or 2. The person consuming the gas upon which a use tax similar to the tax imposed by this section was paid to another state with respect to the gas for which a credit is sought under this subsection. 3,50.050. ADMINISTRATION AND COLLECTION. The use tax hereby imposed shall be paid by the consumer. The administration and collection of the tax hereby imposed shall be pursuant to RCW 82.14.050. 3.50,060. CONTRACT EXECUTION. The Mayor is authorized to execute a contract with the Department of Revenue of the State of Washington for the administration and collection of the tax imposed by this section; provided, that the City Attorney shall first approve the form and content of such contract. 2 ORDINANCE Y AN ORDINANCE relating to utility fees or taxes; amending Chapter 3.04 of the Kent City Code to add Section 3.04.040(1) (d) garbage utility tax as set by Ordinance 2690; to add drainage utility as a utility as approved in Ordinance 2553; to clarify calculation of gross income for utility tax calculation; to increase utility tax on non-City owned utilities of electricity, telephone, and gaseous gas from 2-1/2% to 3.5%; to increase utility tax on City owned utilities water, sewer and drainage from 2.0% to 3.5%. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 3.04 of the Kent City Code - is amended as follows: "3.04.040. CERTAIN UTILITIES SUBJECT TO TAX. (1) in addition to the other business and license fees required by the ordinances of the City of Kent, there is hereby levied upon all persons (including the City of Kent) engaged in certain business activities +(an -ooeugat-ion)-)- a utilities tax to be collected as follows: (a) Upon every person engaging in or carrying on any telephone business within the City, an annual 4(-fee- ar} - tax equal to -( (two-end- -ene-ha H}} three and one-half percent of the total gross operating revenues, including revenues from infra-state toll, derived from the operation of such business within the City of Kent. Gross operating revenues for this purpose shall not include charges which are passed on to the subscribers by a telephone company pursuant to tariffs required by regulatory order to compensate for the cost to the company of the tax imposed by this Chapter. r"'. (i) "Telephone business" means the business of providing access to a local telephone network, local telephone network switching service, toll service, or coin telephone services, or providing telephonic, video, data or similar communication or transmission for hire, via local telephone network, toll time or channel or similar communication or transmission system. It includes cooperative or farmer-line telephone companies or associations operating an exchange. "Telephone business" does not include the providing of competitive telephone service, nor the providing of cable telephone service. (ii) 'Competitive Telephone Service" means the providing by any person of telephone equipment, apparatus, or service other than toll service, which is of a type which can be provided by persons who are not subject to regulation as telephone companies under Title 60 RCW and for which a separate - charge is made. (b) Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business of selling, furnishing, distributing, or producing gaseous gas for commercial or domestic use or purposes, a {(fee -orr)+ tax equal to 4(kwe• and-cne--haifi� three and one-half percent of the total gross income from such business in the City during the tax year for which the license is required. (c) Upon every person engaged in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing, or distributing electricity for light and power, a i(fee- cr4)- tax equal to 4(bwo-and—one-ha3f-)+ three and one-half percent of the total gross income from such business in the City during the tax year for which a license is required. 2 - j"t L. (d) Upon every person engaging in or carrying on a business providing garbage service,_ a tax equal to 6-1/2 percent of the total gross income from such business in the City during the tax year for which the license is required. ( ( (d) ) ) (e) Upon every person (including the City of Kent) engaging in or carrying on the business of selling, furnishing or distributing water, 4(gar-6age•r a-nd�+ sewer or drainage services, a -4(€ee• o•r�h tax equal to +(L-wo—and ene-ha-kf+) three and one-half percent of the total gross income from such business in the City during the tax year. (2) In computing said tax as hereinbefore provided, the taxpayer may deduct •F(}n eomp&ttng)-)- from gross income, the following items: (a) The actual amount of credit losses and uncollectables sustained by the taxpayer; (b) Amounts derived from the transactions in interstate and foreign commerce which the City is prohibited from taxing under the Laws and Constitution of the United States; and (c) The amount of the utility tax collected from the utility customer. For illustrative purposes this would be calculated as follows for a service of $1,500 to collect 2.5 percent utility tax of $37.50: $1,537 .50 less utility tax collected of $37.50 equals $1,500 utility taxable income. $1,500 x .025 = $37.50 utility tax to be paid to City. 3.04.080. UTILITY TAX WHEN DUE. The utility tax imposed by this Chapter shall be due and payable to the Finance Department in quarterly installments and remittance thereof shall be made on or before the last day of the month next succeeding the end of the quarterly period in which the tax accrued. Quarterly period for the purpose of this Chapter shall mean each three (3) month period of the calendar year. The taxpayer on or before said last day of 3 - said month shall .also transmit to the Finance Department a return upon a form to be prescribed and provided by the -( (-c1-er-k})- Finance Department, which return shall contain a statement by the taxpayer, stating the amount of tax for which he is liable for the preceding quarterly period under and computed according to the provisions of this Chapter, that the information therein given and the amount of tax liability .therein reported are full and true and that he knows the same to be so; which statement shall be signed by the taxpayer or authorized agent. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the _L_day of % , 1987. APPROVED the day of 1987. PUBLISHED the day of , 1987. 4 - n J Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19, 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: PARKING INFRACTION PENALTY-ORDINANCE 5kj 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: -Regaeat—fcpr/ uthorization to increase one penalty within the parking infractions section of the Kent City Code from $5 to $10. All other fees and penalties were raised with a prior City ordinance adjustment, but one particular penalty remained at the old amount. Not passing this ordinance provides different penalties for different infractions and the intent of the original change was to increase all fines and penalties to help cover the cost of administration. The amount of money raised by this ordinance will probably be minimal and the City has no track record of receiving any funds related to this particular item, but passage of the ordinance standardizes the penalties. 7-be �� ,� �} {}L;�� [ l�ar� frecl �-Oc&t 4+e- perottij is htgqhtc if, o er'5os� T is m is included her"Bu Hess ra than dtisent al da as qu rum s n send a Ju 2 Op�rattoris itte eetin ,� /Y11 GCtf7GPi [j2a, In U1r CD (20tI rr9 3. EXHIBITS: Memo from Customer Services Manager; Ordinance. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Department c � (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: None SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ~� Councilmember mover, Councilmember second $ for the adoption of Ordinance 0 to increase a por ion o the penalty for parking infractions from $5 to $10, amending Kent City Code 10. 06.210. DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4G f MEMO JUNE 51 1990 TO: operations Committee Members FROM: Charlie Lindsey, Customer Services Manager SUBJECT: Parking Ordinance Correction We recently discovered that when we amended the parking infraction ordinances to raise the fines and penalties that we overlooked one penalty. The attached proposed ordinance corrects the penalty for that violation and brings it in line with the other violations. L ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to parking infraction penalties, increasing a portion of the penalty from five dollars to ten dollars, amending Kent City Code 10.06.210. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Kent City Code 10. 06. 210 as amended follows: 10. 06. 210 PENALTY FOR SECTIONS 10. 06. 010 AND 10. 06. 130 Any violation of Sections 10. 06. 010 and 10. 06. 130 shall be an infraction and punishable by a monetary penalty of not more than twenty-five ($25) dollars; provided, however, that for any person not requesting a mitigation hearing or contested hearing, the penalty shall be five-dallers ten f$101 dollars. Section 2. Any act consistent with the authority and I � prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 3 . Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its fins passage as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19, 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION - 228TH AND 64TH ef 2 . As recommended by the Public Works Committee and Internal Budget Committeeitluthorization or staff 'to-puYsue- right-off=way acquisition at 228th and 64th Avenue, establishment of a budget for same, and transfer of $100,000 from the Military Road (516 to Bolger Rd. ) project to this project. r. This item is included as Other Business rather than Consent Calendar as a quorum was not present at the June 12 Operations Committee meeting. 3 . EXHIBITS: Material from Public Works Committee meeting of 6/5/90; IBC fiscal note; letter from Union Pacific Realty. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee and IBC (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: h^ NO YES FISgAUPERSONNEL NOTE: RecommendedZ J!JL. Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION• moved, brCouncilmemberI seconds, to authorize staff to pursue right-of-way acquisition at 228th an 64th Aire ue, e a ish a ge for s , and tra e� $1 0, 00 fro th Mili ary ad (51 to olge Road pro] ctv th s ,p'roj elct DISCUSSION• ACTION• r Council Agenda Item No. 4H City of Kent, Washington Kent Public Works Committee Date June 5 , 1990 Category 1. SUBJECT: Right of Way Acquisition - 228th and 64th 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: A condition, of the plat approval for Van Doren' s Landing Phase I was that' Union Pacific Realty improve the south half of S. 228th Street along their property frontage. Union Pacific Realty is proceeding with their required improvement but would like to construct a full street improvement on 228th along their property frontage rather than just the required half street. To do so requires acquisition of right of way along the northerly portion which Union Pacific Realty has requested the City acquire. They would then construct the street improvement in accordance with City standards and turn it over to the City for ownership and maintenance. This request provides a unique opportunity for the City to acquire a full street improvement across the frontage of this parcel . The property is in "open space, farm & agricultural" designation for property tax purposes and is, therefore, exempt from paying for any LID for improvements. Depending upon the required right of way width, cost would range from $38 , 000 to $76, 000. We are proposing to reallocate the funds from the Military Road (516 to Bolger Road) project for this right of way acquisition. $100, 000 has been allocated in the CIP for the Military Road project in anticipation of receiving a UAB grant. Since that grant did not materialize, we would recommend reallocating the funds. It is being requested the Public Works Department be authorized to proceed with right of way acquisition and to reallocate the funding for same from the Military Road (SR 516 to Bolger Road) Improvement project. 3 . EXHIBITS : Letter from Union Pacific Realty 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES x FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended_ 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $38 , 000 - $76, 000 SOURCE OF4FUNDS: Reallocate from Military Road (SR 516 to Bolger Road) Improvement Project 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION Councilmeiber moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Message. Dated: 06/06/90 at 1750. Subject: RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION 228TH AND 64TH - FISCAL NOTE Seder: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Contents: 2 . Tc ' Don WICKSTROM / KENT70/PW Part 1. TO: Don WICKSTROM / KENT70/PW Part 2 . THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS PROPOSING A REALLOCATION OF FUNDS, $100, 0001 FROM A MILITARY ROAD PROJECT TO 228TH AND 64TH AVE FOR RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION. THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE $100, 000 FOR MILITARY ROAD WAS AS MATCHING MONEY IN ANTICIPATION OF RECEIVING A UAB GRANT. SINCE THE GRANT DIDN'T MATERALIZE, THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO REALLOCATE. THE REALLOCATION WILL ALLOW THE CITY TO OBTAIN A FULL STREET IMPROVEMENT TO BE PAID FOR BY THE DEVELOPER ONCE THE CITY OWNS THE RIGHT OF WAY. THE IBC RECOMMENDS A BUDGET CHANGE FOR THIS REALLOCATION SINCE IT ALLOWS FOR A FULL STREET IMPROVEMENT AT MINIMAL COST. THE ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE A PARTIAL STREET IMPROVEMENT THAT WOULD NEED TO BE UPGRADED AT FULL CITY COST AT A LATER TIME. UNION PACIFIC REALTYCOMFANY A Subsidiary of lcdI:Knapp Union Pacific Corporation hiiecler Roal Eslatn Opcialiun; May 29 , 1990 Mr. Don Wickstrom City of Kent 220 4th Avenue South Kent, Washington 98032 Re: Acquisition by the City of Kent of additional Right-of-Way along South 228th Street. Dear Don: Ash you are aware, Union Pacific Realty is currently constructing street and utility improvements to service the next Phase of Van Doren's Landing. These improvements include the widening of South 228th Street to five (5) lanes from the West Valley Highway to 64th Avenue South. In addition, the required plat improvements for Van Doren's Landing Phase I (formerly the Polygon Property) requires Union Pacific Realty to improve the south half of South 228th Street along our ownership west of 64th Avenue. While we certainly agree to construct these improvements, it is our preference to construct the entire street section (both north and south sides) at this time. Unfortunately, as shown on the attached prints, Union Pacific Realty does not own the property on the north side of the street and sufficient Right-of-Way does not exist to accommodate the full street section. We are requesting the City of Kent to acquire the sufficient Right-of-Way to allow the full five (5) lane street. Union Pacific Realty would then, at its cost, construct the road improvements. It would be our intent to enter into a late-comers agreement for that section in hopes of recouping some of our costs at a later date if and when that property develops. . Your consideration of this matter is respectfully requested. Sincerely, Ted F. Kn pp attachment 6414 south 220111 Shco Suite 100 KeN.WA 98032 r . Figure 1 i i . S. 212th St. i ..... .. t 0 23.0•.500 750 10001 �1 S. 216th St. —•••••••••1 ' Green River ; j ............... I I S.226th-St. !� J U5I + 'l — 'S.228th SV-% CD VAN DOREN'S LANDING-PHASE! t I 'I t = Legend _:, . Van Doran's Landing outlined �� •`.�� ';--�� ;—_ VAN DOREN'S LANDING Kent, Washingron Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19. 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: 1990 ASPHALT OVERLAY - TRANSFER OF FUNDS ,,I Ile 2. SU11MARY STATIOUM1 : As recommended by the Public Works/15 Committee and Internal Budget Committee, authorization!to transfer $50, 000 from the 277th sanitary sewer trunk line fund to the miscellaneous sanitary sewer improvement fund to offset the expense of the work being done for the sewer utility in the 1990 asphalt overlay project. The Operations Committee discussed this item at their June 12 meeting. This item is included as Other Business rat er than Consent Calendar as a quorum was not present at th June 12 Operations Committee meeting. 3. EXHIBITS: Material from Public Works ommittee of 6/5/90 and IBC fiscal note. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Pubh'c Works Commitlee and IBC (Committee, Staff,. Examiner, Co ission, etc. ) 5, P ONNE IMP CT' NO YES _ FISCAL/PERSONNEL N : Recomme dedw Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moved, er seconded . -ft�e 0A()fl0Y'k 0t" 1-1 2d to authorize the transfe f $50 00 from the 277th sanitary sewer trunk line fund to th mi cellaneous sanitary sewer improvement fund to offset th xpense of the work being done for the sewer utility in the 199 asp overlay project. G� DISCUSSION• ACTION: l Council Agenda Item No. 4I City of Kent, Washington Kent Public Works Committee Date June 5 , 1990 Category 1. SUBJECT: 1990 Asph�lt Overlays 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Included in the Asphalt Overlay project are adjustments to utility facilities such as manholes, gate valves, etc. To maximize the use of street funds and thus increase the actual amount of streets overlayed, we are proposing to charge the utilities (City sewer, drainage and water) for this work. This is not an unusual procedure in that we often charge the utility for improvements made as part of another construction project. Also, when the County overlays a street, the utilities are required to make the necessary adjustments. A review of the various miscellaneous utility improvement funds indicate that the Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer fund does not have sufficient funds to pay its share of the 1990 Overlay project costs. In order to overlay as many streets as possible with the Overlay funds, it is recommended we transfer all the funds ($50, 000) from the 277 sanitary sewer trunk line fund to the Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Improvement fund to offset the expense of the work being done for the sewer utility in the 1990 Asphalt Overlay project. The $50, 000 was originally anticipated to pay for the upsizing of a future trunk sewer line planned by Auburn along S . 277th from the Valley freeway to Green River. However, after further analysis it has been determined that the upsizing would cost more in the range of $1, 000, 000 and would require the updating of our Sewer Comprehensive Plan. Since the developer wants to proceed with the Auburn sewer extension this summer and we neither have the necessary funds nor the sewer line identified in our Comp Plan, we propose dropping our upsizing As such, we recommend reallocating these funds . 3 . EXHIBITS : 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Don Wickstrom 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended_ 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: Reallocation of $50 , 000 to Miscellaneous Sanitary Sewer Improvements 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Message. Dated: 06/06/90 at 1749 . Subject: 1990 ASPHALT OVERLAY - FISCAL NOTE Seraer: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Contents: 2 . Tc Don WICKSTROM / KENT70/PW Part 1. TO: Don WICKSTROM / KENT70/PW Part 2. IN AN EFFORT TO SAVE AS MUCH ASPHALT OVERLAY MONEY AS POSSIBLE FOR ACTUAL OVERLAY WORK, THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS PROPOSING THAT ALL UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS DONE IN CONNECTION WITH OVERLAY WORK BE CHARGED TO THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY, IE WATER, SEWER OR DRAINAGE. IN THE PAST THE COST FOR SUCH ITEMS AS MANHOLE COVERS WAS BORNE BY THE OVERLAY BUDGET. THE DRAINAGE AND WATER OPERATIONS CAN COVER THESE EXPENDITURES WITHIN THEIR BUDGETS. THE SEWER OPERATIONS CAN NOT IN 1990. THE SEWER OPERATIONS DOES THOUGH HAVE A $50, 000 APPROPRIATION THAT THEY WON'T BE SPENDING AND ARE REQUESTING A REALLOCATION OF FUNDS. A $50, 000 AMOUNT WAS ORIGINALLY ANTICIPATED FOR UPSIZING A TRUNK SEWER LINE ALONG S. 277TH. THE UPSIZING REQUIREMENT IS NOW DETERMINED TO BE MUCH LARGER THAN ANTICIPATED, ABOUT ONE MILLION DOLLARS, AND REQUIRES THE UPDATING OF THE SEWER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. IN ADDITION THE DEVELOPER WANTS TO PROCEDE WITH HIS PROJECT SO WE WON'T BE ABLE TO UPSIZE AND THEREFORE THE FUNDS CAN BE REALLOCATED FOR MISCELLANEOUS SEWER PROJECTS OF WHICH THE ASSOCIATED OVERLAY COST ARE A PART. S '.E THIS HELPS MEET THE COUNCIL'S #1 TARGET ISSUE, IMPROVE TRAFFIC FLOW, THE IHC RECOMMENDS A BUDGET CHANGE TO REALLOCATE $50 , 000 FOR MISCELLANEOUS SEWER IMPROVEMENTS. c, [� AJ e r1 r's Pr — STE rr� JUN 191990 Kent City Council Meeting CITY OF KENT Date Category CITY CLERK 1. SUBJECT: 39505 S.E. 308th Enumclaw, Washington 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The home located at 39505 S.E. 308th in Enumclaw, Washington was seized during the investigation of a major marijuana manufacturing and distribution network involving Raymond Hendrickson. This home was subsequently forfeited to the City of Kent. Althou h the property was appraised at $194,000, it is in need of a new roof.'�i g a cash offer of $179,500 for the property as it exists now it-4 recommended that the offer be accepted. ` u")d +v,e Pr,I<< � CG� F Cr � ftY✓ie 3 . EXHIBITS: Report from Chief of Police (attached) . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: City Attorney and Chief of Police i 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NA'LXX YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE -R—EAU—IREEDD: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: tpositi impact) 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION' Co member ty�O fM move@ j0C0 Cl (Af , j iA�c�` � E_ ?uy In Lt� wlc4CcuJ . Ljocd5 DISCUSSION: ��'CC� TN61Pcx GYP L4 ff1� (} 1C��` c3n rar �� 'eCd . ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. I KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT JUNE 18 , 1990 TO: Mayor Dan Kelleher and Kent City Councilmembers FROM: Rod Frederiksen, Chief of _Policel41y SUBJECT: Sale of Property (Kent Police Department Case #89-4309) The single family home located at 39505 S .E. 308th in Enumclaw, Washington was seized during the investigation of a major marijuana manufacturing and distribution network. Raymond Hendrickson was subsequently arrested and is serving 5 years in prison. The Operations Committee approved allowing staff of the Kent Police Department, in conjunction with City Attorney' s staff, to attempt sale of the property. There were no offers on the property. Subsequently, the property was listed with Coldwell Banker Real Estate Company in Enumclaw, Agent Paula Anderson. This was with the approval of the City Administrator and Operations Committee. On June 6, 1990, the City of Kent received an offer of $175, 000 for the property in its present condition. Although the appraisal on ~ the home was $194 , 000, it is acknowledged that the roof on the structure will have to be replaced within five years. A counter offer of $179 , 500 by the City is acceptable to the buyers. I recommend that the offer from Howard J. and Kelle J. Weisburg be approved by the Council, authorizing the Mayor to sign the sales agreement. The following is a fiscal analysis regarding the property at 39505 S.E. 308th St. : Sale Price Offer $179 , 500. 00 Principal Amount Owing on Note 110, 000. 00 Costs to Date to Cure Defects 7 , 000. 00 . Note Payments to Date 10, 000. 00 Total Costs and Principal Owing $127 , 000. 00 Plus Costs of Closing 9 , 385. 00 and Commissions 900. 00 Net Recovery to City $ 42, 215. 00 Subject to dollar for dollar recovery for City's investigative expenses in KPD case #89-4309 . Subject to RCW 69 . 50 . 505 formula of 25% recovery to City, 75% for real property to State. Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19, 1990 Category Bid 1. SUBJECT: PHYSICAL FITNESS EQUIPMENT FOR EAST HILL COMPLEX 2. SUMMARY STATEMM: Bid opening was held on June 11. After extensive analysis, the Fire Department will recommend the acceptance of the bids received from the low bidders at the Council meeting. 3. EXHIBITS: Executive summary; bid information to be presented at Council meeting. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo Fire Chief; Firefighter Pat Pawlak Furnishings Manager (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended N A Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: This information will be presented the night of the Council meeting. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety bond levy -- 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTI N: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the bids for physical fitness equipment for the East Hill complex be awarded to in the amount of $ (ok3 Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the bids for physical fitness equipment for the East Hill complex be awarded to in the amount of $ Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the bids for physical fitness equipment for the East Hill complex be awarded to in the amount of $ DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JUNE 19, 1990 TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS, WHITE DOWELL, JOHNSON, HOUSER, MANN, ORR FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEFG� SUBJECT: BIDS FOR PHYSICAL FITNESS EQUIPMENT FOR EAST HILL COMPLEX ------------------------------------------------------------- INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND The east hill complex will serve as fire administration, police substation, fire station, police/fire training center, emergency coordination center (ECC) and an indoor shooting range. The physical fitness room will be utilized by both fire and police personnel. The physical fitness equipment for the entire facility is included in these bids. Bids were advertised in such a manner to allow us to pick the components which would give us the best overall low price without compromising the specifications. The bids were opened on June lith. Once the bids have been analyzed, we will recommend awarding to the low bidders at the June 19th Council meeting due to extensive investigation. RECOMMENDED ACTION The fire department will recommend awarding to the low bidders. SIGNIFICANCE This will allow for the proposed physical fitness equipment to be delivered in a timely manner. BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT This has been budgeted through the bond levy with no impact on the general operating budget of the fire department. ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES None Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 1990 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: Physical fitness equipment for east hill complex. 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The fire department is recommending purchasing those items at the lowest possible cost from vendors who met the specifications. 3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary, Bid information to be presented at Council meeting. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo Fire Chief and Firefighter Pat Pawlak Furnishings Manager 5. FISCAL IMPACT: NO X YES _ FISCAL NOTE: N/A 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $12 117 47 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety Bond Levy 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the bids for Physical fitness equipment for the east hill complex be awarded to: Nordic Track in the amount of $683 19 ; Body Builders Gym Equipment in the amount of $2 426 85 • Seattle Athletic & Exercise Inc. in the amount of $2 907 89 • and Exercise Equipment Center in the amount of $6 099 54 - f DISCUSSION: ACTION: m r r C A O D D i n W < r K K -i X 2 n D r r T m T A z r = K 3 3 T A r n K L n ... T W m .9i O m ti C T O z .- \ •-. m JO v O rt m .•. -d T �y/1 .-• ... ... -1 9 --1 3 O Z m A n k 6f m K r D n n n 70 n n X O n m m Z N C -� C N Z T A M V r N m r CD A D •.. T c x Z n --� Z ^ Z T N n Z m m K 9p�Q -1 �7 n W v 2 D W n r D -� ^ -� X T 3. p V O D ♦ < 7o C nm 67 m W W m x .-• � C C 70 GY L N \ N p x o W A z z 70 JO y C JO )O n • m SO S ^ n r n r -1 L) N C m n m O ^ Z ^ t 7C M 3 -/ R m m N x T r x Z O m A O W N )o m o c', v W < < W r W V O x D P w W N T L'f O m JO D Z ID W y A m z < p V ^ m 1D O P N r n 3 a o o = y T Z N '� O 7k 0 x N p y W W C4 ik w • D T y A y O nC N O O $x m M < K to J J w y 3 co .N-. m m J W J W W W W P P N 41 LA P Z z z z z z z y C o z A •p %A vi .p A O P V N w •O y 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 k 0 i m a K O Ut O P �JI O O O O O O V1 O M rt pp Z N • W ♦ W W W_ W W_ M W_ C m r O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O • i K Y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y 0 rt 0 0 0 0 0 rt 0 y V A T x z z = Al G m T y N H m M V) m m y m y m m -+ J W ► y N .c.. m .JVl .PO .ion w w �NpyoWp(�.. J .l VV J V z ui z w Z �n Z y x m v m r .PO N to Ui O o o o N O W N N O y V y 0 •0 0 0 0 i m -Yi m V� y k YI Q • y W W W W y y z N O p O O • O po O po O O po O O rt 0 M po A N O S O O m 0 y 0 0 0 d 0 0 0 0 0 rt 0 y 0 0 0 0 v O v n m m - y rt m W i D k O y C m A rt T RI O _ N w IN Z Z Z z Z z Z k .- F !� p w •O • O y 0 0 0 0 0 * O w = A O o * ZS d �^ W_ W W W W W y W rt m m O O O O O O O y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 1yj 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 � N Z _ y O y O y y r y m m ^' 9 Mm J N P N N N �n P J VV to z Z Z w W L rt m {per 0 0 0 rt 0 k v n 8 V1 .gyp N W W O rt rt y W rt W y N 0 0 o in pp • pp �p o �n o 0 0 0 o y o 0 o g y y > m 8 0 0 0 � 0 0 • O O O O O O O O O rt 0 0 0 0 v 0 y 0 y v rt y y k rt rt 4 y m J J W y a m wp V A 41 P N N IVn P N p Np.. -+ N •pp. v V1 Z Z Z V W COZ R M O N VI l!1 •O N O M O � N N O O V�1 0 VI y 06 0 0 o o g w o 0 0 0 0 0 o w v v m rt rt y y rt rt ■ w rt N A �A VI V1 A N V N N N P z P Z Z Z W OD P z y VI N .�pp VV .p rt W A O pyp/ vi O V 10 O •O •O O y W O VI VI N V1 » O .O A P O % 6 v� W_ W � V1 V1 W * .C.• y 0 0 0 0 0 0 o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y r y y y y A y •Jp '0 AwO AN O W �Po OZ 'PO Oz OZ OZ OZ OZ 'PO :O 1 r O •O rty W O W_ W W W •O W_ W y C_ -N- O O O O O O O f O O O O O O O O O O O O ♦ r O Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19. 1990 Category Bid 1. SUBJECT: RADIO TRANSMITTER TOWER 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Chief Angelo, Chief Frederiksen, and Lt. Kearns will make a recommendation at the Council meeting regarding the bid analysis for construction of the radio transmitter tower. 3 . EXHIBITS: Executive summary; bid information to be presented at Council meeting. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo Fire Chief; Rod Frederiksen, Police Chief; Lt. Kevin Kearns Radio Prolect Manager (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL./PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO X YES FISgAUPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended N A Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: This information will be presented the night of the Council meeting. SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety bond levy 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember r1A '-J'yW ) moves, Councilmember "� seconds that the bid for the construction of the radio transmitter tower be awarded to in the amount of $ and that the Mayor be authorized to sign the contract. DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5B Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19 . 1990 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: Construction of radio transmitter tower. 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Chief Angelo, Chief Frederiksen and Lt. Kearns will be making recommendation at the Council meeting regarding the bid analysis. 3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary, Bid information to be presented at Council meeting. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo Fire Chief Rod Frederiksen, Police Chief and Lt. Kevin Kearns Radio Project Manager 5. FISCAL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL NOTE: N/A 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $55 568 81 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety Bond Levy 7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember� moves, Councilmember seconds v, that the bid for the construction of the radio transmitter tower to be awarded to Microflect in the amount of $55 568 81 and authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. DISCUSSION: OVA ACTION: EXESUMRA.WPF PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO TOWER BID OPENING 06/18/90 MICROFLECT SEACOMA BAKER SABRE COMMON. CONST. COMMON. TOWER BASE BID $23,960.00 $20,777.00 $30,765.00 $33,841.00 INSTALLATION $27,445.00 $31,000.00 $29,441.00 $31,328.00 SUBTOTAL $51,405.00 $51,777.00 $60,206.00 $65,169.00 WSST $4,163.81 $4,193.94 $4,876.69 $5,278.69 TOTAL $55,568.81 $55,970.94 $65,082.69 $70,447.69 AMOUNT OVER LOWEST BID $402.13 $9,513.88 $14,878.88 SEACOMA'S BID IS NON-COMPLIANT W/ SPECIFICATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY JUNE 19, 1990 TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS, COUNCILMEMBERS WHITE, DOWELL, JOHNSON, HOUSER, MANN, ORR FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF 'x SUBJECT: BIDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC SAFETY TRANSMITTER RADIO TOWER ---------------------------------------------------------------- INTRODUCTIONj BACKGROUND As part of the 800 MHz Trunked Radio and Mobile Data Terminal systems implementation, the City is developing a radio transmitter tower at the Cambridge water tank site behind the West Hill Fire Station. This work was placed to bid in May, but the Fire Department recommended rejection of the resulting bids to Council at their May 15, 1990 meeting due to technical non- compliance and cost. The work was re-bid and these bids will be opened on June 18 , 1990. An analysis of the bidding results will be presented to the Council at the meeting on June 19 , 1990. RECOMMENDED ACTION The fire department will recommend awarding this bid based on the qualifications of bidders and the bid amounts. SIGNIFICANCE Since the West Hill site is the primary site in these systems, this work needs to proceed in a timely manner to assure completion of the systems within the project timeline. BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT This has been budgeted through the bond levy with no impact on the general operating budget of the fire department. EXESUMRA.WPF Executive Summary to Mayor Kelleher and Councilmembers June 19, 1990 Page 2 ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES None. tcn EXESUMRA.WPF ..... Kent City Council Meeting Date June 19. 1990 PO Category Bid 1. SUBJECT: 1990 ASPHALT OVERLAY 2. SU1+II+I STATEMENT: Bid opening was held on May 24, 1990. Three bids were submitted with M. A. Segale, Inc. submitting the low bid for Schedules I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X, and XI in the amount of $305,833 .03 . Sys recommendAd this bid be accepted. 3. EXHIBITS: Bid summary; memorandum from Public Works Director. 1 __. 4 . RECO ED : Staff (Committee Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDG PERSONNEL ACT: NO� YES FIS P O L NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE RE UIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUND : 7. CITY COUNCIL Councilmember q move , Councilmember second that the bid submitted by M. A. Segale in the amount of $305, 833 .03 be accepted for the 1990 Asphalt Overlay. DISCUSSION: L ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 5C DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS June 14, 1990 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom RE: 1990 Asphalt Overlay Bid opening was May 24 , 1990. Three bids were submitted with M.A. Segale, Inc. submitting the low bid in the amount of $305, 833 . 03 for Schedules I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X, and XI. The project will provide overlay and improvements to East George Street from Central to North Woodford Ave, 114th Avenue S.E. from S.E. 256th Street to the end, State Street from James Street to E. George Street, James Street at intersection with 1st Avenue, Salt Air Hills, Eastridge, Frager Road, 4th Avenue from Smith Street to James Street, Manchester Avenue from Canterbury Lane to S. 268th Street and S. 248th Street from 35th Avenue S. to Military Road in Cherry Park Estates. Construction is estimated to be $336, 416. 33 . It is recommended the bid from M.A. Segale, Inc. in the amount of $305, 833 . 03 be accepted for Schedules I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X, and XI of the 1990 Asphalt Overlay project. BID SUMMARY M.A. Segale $305,833 . 03 Lakeside Industries $317, 191.75 Watson Asphalt Paving Co. , Inc. $342 , 906.75 Engineer's Estimate $390, 623 . 50 IYIw M . y i MtM M � . MIw M 1 ,yin .YI \ II•N •j 1 1.\I hwl . • r�i .I. r. • 1 n• - Ic J Who WI• •� `show .rl . �",' -';1• - - • VNI " h1 I ♦,111 11•J11IO ,y a1 n N 11 - M MIM .N 4 Nrw ` [ - • • I,• � FZ[�y� IM 4 .•Iw .. . •Ylw = Z i ♦ n . i t .rl Y 11' wp .w M-• � r ♦ ,� „ .y i f 1 � IwM. tl C. I'JIr• �-�.•' vAf 10 Ll so N +IrY I •"'Y' • II to o •� _ m 00 z � , It 6 1 N H "*hhh. M so I /1 s1 1 f r —T.o�. s f , • N 1 Ir 31 1 .r r wlry0•• ,. K.qY. M •�M.a �1 I 1 L ill 1 � \ = � \ .. • S 1 w HIM t • wi 1 ,\ • IT ,� t f\ •I•» 1pyTN , •/w0 ` IT M� •T r I((TN lTMIT ,� •wo.E S f � . � � • .•1.0 Ir � N/T711G/1AIMf t r.00. 1 1 I Al . F w IT PROJECT .•Hrw r , 'W,. �k ; i LOCATION ,I I '-•• IVHI I, NpI . M a K Si �•ANGL.E LAKE .Wlw 1 r N/ •r[ N"" IWtK .. t 0il o.« K14 10 NN `'ii I d. !{ its .ow ewtaw • - l�erHNT]w. • _ �CNMI •f* PROJECT r >< ]]Mi /T LOCATION 9 - ----.. --- — 16 f tr ]]!rr l Y ! M Tr 1 lilTM 1% s� IL n f T I/T wr is ]NTw !T �amvD W l C �Too 44 So "4•w ra. 3 r�w s 16 1! :T 16 21 22 r 20 21 _ ! r ] u ]wTr & • Y �.fAIIC � � R cow 1 1 PROJECT �,� LOCATION .nw it Y N s, lot H SE 251,t it s W N` M IL { ,1- _ • 1 1 4TN FT t ]wT. 40 }+ :0 2i 28 r� - t le _ l IA.got TM T • 1 IQNT iCH Ol r OW�DI A 1 • v1, f r \ ] u 1 I 1 K'NOO\ t .;,I,s•al,l 11 �. c .1 • i ♦ l� 1 � 1 r ltaM S a 1 � _ • - _ Y A N 1MM - ar • 1 • 1 I.I 1/ I VFW ^ — 1 t"IN IS »1 t ( "v' • ` rousr�lw Aelr 1 1 1 nla � [ 1 •t PR 'Ea ATI rr V a t• �1 � 1 �� w' , V rr I a 'C. (µ K fMM r I • a i� • \ ' I ,� f /« • M.I. . /�', wltt - � a 1n ■ � /M{Mlw� I 1A11.L,K It _ _ . t nw•val, • + a a u, nu - - IIIrM Ir C11 • + C r [ t ..�a tMMaa a, f f' ,•'� � 4 t • Itwte a . trrr ��a ♦ .. 'r � • •aw rt f,�,,. sow. n 1 ►2 , i•n N^•Ilnl S M lrel/a 1 � i ter n 1 q,lw �+lu �.•'', ,�; i .�8 r t{7 � • 1 I••ra r• . t 11�1 1.�'u • E tt � ; f �I� • • � l au�•aMr 1, - •� .II.a• f' ••. i , ,1.,r� ./+•vim 3 I .' •w Ir � ' 1 [»I(ItO a +ice� tla,.a ♦r , ..fi� ; . .E f,d�n li i M f � CM I ,/,�aat 1r a 3 ' ,•�'^ !�` , n r l,tw � � � `i :� i ...0. "• 1 .IIM.! „ i( �' 4a MM1 KMIOCIM (511 .4s it 1 ' It loan AIM r1 \ •1 � R EA P(�J O R T S A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT W& B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE D. PLANNING COMMITTEE i i i E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE�� 1'tiyU _rs, -fit ul.i�� F. PARKS COMMITTEElf� ' o w u:,� 4��G�i c ate- /-, / G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS L