HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 06/05/1990 City of Kent
C
itv Cou nci l Meeti n
g
Agenda
Sunnycrest School
6 00 P . M .
24629 42nd Ave . S .
Mayor Dan Kelleher
Council Members
Judy Woods, President
Leona Orr Steve Dowell
..:XXXI
Christi Houser Jon Johnson
Paul Mann Jim White
June 5, 1990
Office of the City Clerk
..........
..............
. ..... ......
.........
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 5, 1990
Summary Agenda
This meeting will be held at Sunnycrest Elementary School on the West
Hill, 24629 42nd Avenue South and will commence at 6: 00 p.m.
City of Kent School
chool
Office of the City Clerk p.m.
NOTE: Items on the Consent Calendar are either routine or
have been previously discussed. Any item may be
removed by a Councilmember. The Council may add and
act upon other items not listed on this agenda.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Presentation - 6: 00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. , Nike Manor Housing
Discussion
B. Employee of the Month
C. Proclamation - National Flag Day
0 k�)"0-
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Continued Hearing on LID 330
3 . CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Minutes
B. Bills
C. Crime Prevention Contribution
D. Council Absence
E. Lewd Conduct Ordinance
F. Extension of Solid Waste Collection Contract
G. Hearing Dates for Mortenson Annexation Zoning
H. Human Services Roundtable
I. Kent Springs Improvement Acceptance'
J. Country Hills Apts. - Bill of Sale
K. Josey Glen Plat - Bill of Sale
L. Vehicle Registration/Transportation Improvements -
Resolution 4-04t?
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
A. Walnut Grove Preliminary Plat
B. Vision 20/20 PSCOG
5. BIDS
A. Hazardous Materials Vehicle
B. Audio/Visual Equipment
C. Aerial Ladder Truck
D. Oak Furniture
E. Furnishings for East Hill Complex
F. West Valley Signals
G. LID 330
H. Radial Camera
I. Surplus Telemetry
J. Riding Mower
K. Water Tank Repainting
6. REPORTS
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT
(` PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
L make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A) Presentation - 6: 00 p.m. to 7 : 00 p.m. , Nike Manor Housing
J
Discussion
t
B) Employee, of the Qnth
C) Proclamation - National Flag Day
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5, 1990
t Category Public Hearing
1. SUBJECT: LID 330 - 64TH AVENUE SOUTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The public hearing on confirmation of the
final assessment rol}� has been continued to this date to allow
additional time for GOrporate Property Investors to evaluate the
impact of their final assessment.
Public Work! 1_:1_r,>ct ;)r wiu),, that he had met wi h
Corporate Park; Investors .,,I ] eir concerns have be-ri
resolved. Ted Knapp, Uni ()r, I i:" Realty, stated that
they support this LLD based ci t. i understanding that -.he
remaining segment b,2tweern ind the Puget Power
right-of-way will be, built_ Li tn, nmediate future. The'-e
3 . were no further comments frorr tri, ,udience and the public
hearing was closed by motion.
4. RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examin r, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERSO L IMPACT: NO__.yl_ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: ecommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTI�OyNN- --__
Councilmember I "� moves, Councilmember seconds
the memorandum from the Director of Public Works be made a par f"6a:
of the record, and that Ordinance J 1,,f,-P
No. ,-), be adopted confirming the final assessment roll forj
�, _ r ,I
LID 330.
DISCUSSION• �w
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2A
aA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 15, 1990
TO: Mayor Kelleher
City Council
FROM: Don Wickstroillu
RE: LID 330 : 64th Avenue South Street Improvements
(Meeker Street to South 212th Street)
May 15th has been set for the public hearing for the confirmation
of the final LID assessment roll for LID 330: 64th Avenue South
Street Improvements.
BACKGROUND
The transportation element of the 1980 Valley Studies program
identified 64th Avenue South as a future collector arterial route
essential for development of this portion of the valley floor. The
actual timing for the installation of 64th Avenue South has been
tied to the pressure applied by the private development along this
corridor and the willingness of the property owners to fund the
construction.
Discussions and meetings with several of the involved property
owners indicated that the time was now optimum to form the LID and
thus ORDINANCE NO. 2866 was passed by the City Council which
established LID 330 . Preliminary estimates were prepared and an
assessment role was prepared and sent to the property owners
included in the LID.
After several revisions to the preliminary scope of work, LID 330
was advertised for a bid opening of April 17th, 1990 .
The Director of Public Works now desires to close the LID in order
to save interim funding costs .
PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
This project is for the widening of 64th Avenue South from West
Smith Street to West James Street; and for the construction of 64th
Avenue South from West James Street to South 228th Street; and for
the construction of 64th Avenue South from South 216th Street to
South 212th Street. Traffic signals shall be installed at West
Meeker Street, West James Street, South 228th Street and South
212th Street.
These proposed improvements reflect the deletion of one portion of
roadway originally included in the project scope. The design of
that portion of roadway and associated improvements between South
226th Street and South 216th Street was complicated by the
proximity to the abandoned sewer lagoons, and the incompleteness
of the plans for the construction of a regional detention
pond/enhanced wetland at that location.
It was determined to delete this portion of the project until the
plans for the detention pond/enhanced wetland were complete, and
to complete the deleted portion of this project via a new LID at
a later date when all environmental impacts could be determined.
The project as now proposed includes the following improvements :
1. Four to five lane roadway, two lanes in each direction with
turn lanes or landscaped medians. The roadway section varies
within the project limits.
2 . Curb and gutter
3 . Cement concrete sidewalks on both sides
4 . Open channel and closed pipe storm drainage system
5 . Street lighting
6 . Street trees and grass planting strips
7 . Sanitary sewer and watermain extensions ; with stub
outs as
required
8 . Traffic signals
9 . Landscaped medians and large landscaped planting areas (north
of South 236t:h Street)
NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS
1. Drainage: Currently there is an inadequate drainage system in
the project area. Ponding and flooding of storm water occurs
often. A complete and adequate drainage system for the area is need
to provide for safe disposal of storm water. A complete storm
drainage system is provided for the area including stubouts to
undeveloped parcels .
2 . Street: The existing portions of 64th Avenue South are
substandard and without such amenities as sidewalks, curbs &
gutters and street lights . These improvements will be installed
at the same time that the new roadway is constructed.
3 . Utilities: various properties within the area are not
currently hooked up to City water and sanitary sewer or are not
fully serviced for their potential highest and best use. Prior to
constructing the roadway these utilities will be extended beyond
the roadway to avoid future street cuts. Puget Sound Power &
Light, Washington Natural Gas, and US West Communications are also
installing their private utilities as part of this project.
4 . Development Requirement: Undeveloped parcels along the 64th
2
Avenue South corridor which do not yet have access to the new
street and constructed utilities will now have such access. In
addition, some parcels which are already constructed or are under
construction will have additional access to water, sewer,
telephone, electrical power, natural gas, and improved storm
drainage facilities so that they may develop to their full
potential .
PROJECT FUNDING
This project will be funded entirely by Local Improvement District
number 330 .
It should be remembered that the project as described above
includes various features not normally installed with City street
improvement projects. These features include landscaped medians,
irrigation systems within the medians, eight foot wide landscaping
stripes between the curb and the sidewalks, and construction of one
over-length box culvert at South 228th Street. These additional
features were requested by Union Pacific Realty Company, one of the
major property owners along the 64th Avenue South corridor. These
additional features are for the most part charged directly to Union
Pacific Realty Company, although the City of Kent is also sharing
with some of these extra costs . The remaining property owners are
being assessed for the cost of a "standard 58 foot roadway" ,
without landscaped 17 foot medians or 8 foot landscaping strips .
Costs not included in the basic LID distribution include:
1. Landscaped median with irrigation system
2 . Extra street tree expenses for number, size or type
3 . Extra wide planting strips between the curb and sidewalks
4 . Additional street lighting required because of the large
trees installed within the landscaped medians
5 . Additional right-of-way or easements needed for the wider
roadway section.
6 . Majority of Valley channel and box culvert drainage system
(Assessed to City Property)
3
The total cost breakdown is as follows:
Basic LID distribution (all properties) $4 , 065 ,726 . 84
Costs directly assessed (UPRC and City Only) $1, 128 , 654 . 02
LID total $5, 194 , 380 . 86
COST SUMMARY
CATEGORY TOTAL COST
Street $3 , 913 , 613 . 85
Watermain 233 , 318 . 77
Sanitary Sewer 355, 406 . 51
Traffic Signals 692 , 041.73
LID Total $5, 194 , 380. 86
LID Credits and Prepayments: $324 , 831.70
Amount to be funded by LID 330 : $4 , 869, 549 . 16
PRELIMINARY CITY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
LANDSCAPING
ASSESSMENT PROPERTY BASIC MEDIANS AND PRELIMINARY
NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT FEES ASSESSMENT
10 & 11 Abandoned sewer
lagoons $673 , 683 . 41 $2711183 . 76 $944 , 867 . 17
13 Puget Power Right-
of-way acquisition $82 , 736 . 16 $24 , 871. 88 $107 , 608 . 04
96 City shops &
Russell Road Park $12 022 . 70 -0- $12 , 022 . 70
TOTAL CITY ASSESSMENT $768 , 442 . 27 $296, 055. 64 1, 064 , 497 . 91
CURRENT CITY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
WATER, SEWER,
ASSESSMENT PROPERTY BASIC MEDIANS AND CURRENT
NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT VALLEY STORM ASSESSMENT
10 & 11 Abandoned sewer
lagoons -0- $766, 211. 17 $766, 211. 17
96 City Shops &
Russell Road Park $12 733 . 41 -0- $ 12 , 733 . 41
TOTAL CITY ASSESSMENT $12 , 733 .41 $766, 211. 17 $778 , 944 . 58
$834 , 492 . 01
4
BOND RESERVE FUND
A Bond Guarantee Fund is required to protect the bond holders in
case LID 330 assessments are not paid. The City ' s current fund is
just sufficient to cover existing outstanding assessments.
Additional LID formations will require the generation of more
guarantee funds. This is being accomplished through the LID
assessments via a larger bond issuance for LID 330. Therefore the
costs herein include an amount equal to about 10% of the total bid
total to provide for the Bond Guarantee Fund.
FORMATION OF THE LID
This LID was formed when the Kent City Council passed ORDINANCE
2566 on August 1, 1969 .
Because of the changes in the project scope (deletion of South
226th Street to South 216th Street, and mitigation requirements
through wetlands along the project corridor) , and the way in which
the total LID costs were distributed to four different subareas
within the LID boundary, some of the current assessments are
slightly higher than the preliminary assessments, while other
current assessments actually went down when compared to the
preliminary assessment roll .
CITY FUNDS
The City is paying for valley drainage system improvements that are
necessary to handle the storm drainage flows expected from adjacent
parcels and from the surface of 64th Avenue South, but that have
always been considered part of LID 306 (not yet formed) .
The City is also paying for a portion of the extra costs associated
with construction of landscaped medians and over-sized landscaped
planting areas, as well as a portion of the costs for watermain and
sanitary sewer costs that significantly increased because of the
revised scope of work for this project.
There are no City funds directly associated with this project, but
there are three City properties which are assessed under this LID.
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The project costs and assessments were calculated separately for
four different sections of the project. These sections are as
follows:
5
North: South 216th Street to South 212th Street
Central: West James Street to South 228th Street
South: West Meeker Street to West James Street
Traffic Signals : West Meeker Street; West James Street
South 228th Street; and South 212th Street
The costs under each category of assessment are distributed to each
property benefitting as follows:
1. Street - The assessments are based upon square footage
within the assessment boundary. The assessment rate decreased
with 100 foot zones back from the public right-of-way with a
maximum of seven zones . The zone rate for the first 100 foot
strip abutting the right-of-way is seven times the zone rate
for the 100 foot strip which begins 600 feet from the edge of
the right-of-way, and so on. Property further than 700 feet
from the edge of right-of-way is not. assessed.
2 . Sanitary Sewer - In the central portion of the project, the
assessments are .based upon square footage within 350 foot wide
zones. Property more than 350 feet from the edge of right-
of-way is not assessed.
In the south portion of this project there are existing
sanitary sewers and no new stubouts will be constructed, and
thus there is no assessment distribution for sewer on this
portion of the project.
In the north portion of this project, direct stubout costs are
assessed directly to the owners of property receiving
stubouts. If there is no stubout, there is no assessment.
3 . Watermain - In the north and central portions of this
project, the assessments are based upon square footage within
300 foot wide zones . Property more than 300 feet from the
edge of right-of-way is not assessed.
In the south portion of this project, assessments are made
directly for one property which will receive a standard one
inch water service, and for another property which will have
two existing meters relocated inside of the new sidewalk.
4 . Traffic Signals - The traffic signal assessment also
involves properties outside the street assessment areas.
Additional properties are assessed which were determined to
contribute significant traffic impacts upon the performance
level of 64th Avenue South.
The costs for each traffic signal benefit area is allocated
to various subareas with the overall LID boundary as follows:
6
AREA INTERSECTION ASSESSED
1. North of South 212th Street (BOEING) 1/2 of South 212th Signal
2 . South of South 212th Street 1/2 of South 212th Signal
3 . North of South 228th Street 1/2 of South 228th Signal
4 . West James Street to South 228th
Street 1/2 of West James Signal
1/2 of South 228th Signal
5. West Meeker Street to West James
Street 1/2 of West James Signal
1/2 of West Meeker Signal
6 . South of West Meeker Street 1/2 of West Meeker Signal
EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
The construction of the project required property acquisition in
some locations to provide the necessary right-of-way. Slope and
construction easements are also required in places . These
easements and right-of-way were purchased outright in most cases,
but one owner elected to use the cost of the purchase as a credit
toward his LID assessment, thus reducing the total amount of
funding to be financed by the LID.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
The City of Kent Planning Department issued a conditioned DNS for
LID 330 on July 11, 1989 . This project fully meets these
conditions .
The US Department of the Army issued a nationwide permit for
filling within a wetland on December 21, 1989 after the City
proposed mitigation measures to ensure the smallest impact upon the
wetlands along this route.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Upon Council passing the ordinance confirming the final assessment
roll, there is a 30-day period in which any portion or all of the
assessment can be paid without interest charges. After the 30-day
period, the balance is paid over a fifteen-year period wherein each
year ' s payment is one-fifteenth of the principal plus interest on
the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates.
7
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . city council Action:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember _
seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through L be approved.
Discussion
Action L
f�r
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
May 15, 1990.
3B. Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through
after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at
4 : 30 p.m. on June 12 , 1990.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
i' j
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/18/90 135667 - 136375 $832 ,991. 11
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
Councilmember J moves, Councilmember �'Acz ..I"k- vL-.-
seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through L be approved.
s t; � r;
' �. .
Discussion
Action
�y 3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of
fU May 15, 1990.
3B. Approval of Bills.
+T
Approval of payment of the bills received through - 3/ - Il-,
° after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at
4 : 30 p.m. on June 12 , 1990.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/18/90 135667 - 136375 $832 , 991. 11
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
2 A
Kent, Washington
May 15, 1990
Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at
7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Pro Tem/Council President Woods. Present:
Councilmembers Dowell, Houser, Johnson, Mann, White and Orr, City
Administrator Chow, City Attorney Driscoll, Planning Manager
Satterstrom, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Police Chief
Frederiksen, Fire Chief Angelo, Assistant City Administrator Hansen,
Parks Director Wilson, Finance Director McCarthy, Information Services
Director Spang, Personnel Director Olson and City Clerk Jensen.
Mayor Kelleher was out of town and Planning Director Harris was ill.
Approximately 70 people were at the meeting.
PUBLIC (PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1A)
COMMUNICATIONS National Public Works Week. Mayor Pro Tem/Council
President Woods read a proclamation which notes that
the health, ''safety, and comfort of this community
greatly depends on public works facilities and
services and declared the week of May 20 - 26, 1990
to be National Public Works Week in the City. The
proclamation was presented to Public Works Director
Wickstrom.
(PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1B)
Kiwanis Club of Kent - 60th Birthday. Mayor Pro
Tem/Council President Woods noted that on May 16,
1990, the Kiwanis Club of Kent celebrates its 60th
year of community service to Kent and its citizens
and read a proclamation declaring May 16, 1990 as
Kiwanis Club of Kent - 60th Birthday in Kent.
(PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1C)
Law Enforcement Torch Run for Special Olympics.
Mayor Pro Tem/Council President Woods announced that
more than 1300 law enforcement officers from
departments across Washington State will relay
Special Olympics Torches more than 1, 000 miles
between May 28 and June 1, 1990, and that City of
Kent Police Officers will carry the Special Olympics
Torch through the City at approximately 1: 00 p.m. on
Friday, June 1, 1990. She also noted that the City
of Kent Police Officers are raising funds from
business owners and residents for this project. She
then read a proclamation declaring the week of May
28 through June 3 , 1990 as Law Enforcement Torch Run
for Special Olympics Week in the City of Kent and
urged the citizens and business owners of Kent to
1
May 15, 1990
PUBLIC help support the Kent Police Officers in their fund
COMMUNICATIONS raising and torch carrying efforts. The
proclamation was presented to Chief Frederiksen and
Lt. Everett.
(PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1D)
Police Memorial Day. A proclamation was read
declaring the week of May 14 - 18, 1990 as National
Police Week and May 15, 1990 as Police Memorial Day
in the City of Kent. Mayor Pro Tem/Council
President Woods noted that every two days an
American police officer will be killed in the line
of duty somewhere in the United States and 136
officers will be seriously assaulted in the
performance of their duties. She urged all citizens
to make every effort to honor, appreciate and
express their thanks to our men and women who make
it possible for us to leave our homes and family in
safety each day and to return to our homes knowing
they are protected. The proclamation was presented
to Chief Frederiksen and Lt. Everett.
Mayor Pro Tem/Council President Woods introduced
Senator Eleanor Lee, who represents the 33rd
District and welcomed her to the meeting.
CONSENT WHITE MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through J
CALENDAR be approved except for Item D which was removed by
Dowell. Houser seconded and the motion carried.
MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A)
Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the
Council meeting of May 1, 1990.
HEALTH AND (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F)
SANITATION Cypress Inn. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and
warranty agreement supplied by Charles B. Harris for
continuous operation and maintenance of
approximately 275 feet of water line, 325 feet of
sanitary sewer, 195 feet of curb, gutter and
sidewalk, 270 feet of asphalt concrete and 28 feet
of storm sewer constructed in the vicinity of
84th Avenue South and South 222nd Street for the
Cypress Inn at Kent project, and release of cash
bond after expiration of the one year maintenance
period.
2
May 15, 1990
SEWER (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B)
Metro Sewerage Disposal Agreement. This item was
discussed at the Public Works Committee meeting on
January 9th.
Metro is seeking a contract amendment essentially to
implement a change in the residential customer
equivalency value which is used as a basis for
charging non-residential customers. This change
would increase Metro ' s bill to the City by $160, 000
per year. The Public Works Department, while
supporting the change, recommends tabling any action
thereon until a determination of the City' s
financial exposure per the cleanup of the abandoned
sewage lagoon is known. Metro was the
owner/operator of the lagoon from 1967 to 1976 and
as such, may have some participating financial
responsibility thereto. Therefore, any and all
negotiation points should be preserved.
Wickstrom noted that Metro's contract cannot be
amended unless they have approval from 100% of their
contracting agencies. If the City of Kent does not
approve the contract, they would not be able to
implement this rate change. He said that the City
is faced with the potential cleanup of the lagoon at
great expense. He noted that this is a regional
issue and there will be regional pressure to sign
the contract.
WHITE MOVED to withhold any action on the Metro
Sewerage Disposal contract and amendment at this
time. Johnson seconded and the motion carried.
STREETS (PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM 2B)
LID 330 - 64th Avenue South Street Improvements.
May 15 has been scheduled for the public hearing on
confirmation of the final assessment roll for LID
330 and proper legal notice has been given. The
Director of Public Works will describe the project
and manner of assessments.
Wickstrom described the project and the manner of
assessments and noted that a protest had been
received from Maurice Peterson of Bridgewater II,
representing an assessment of $13 . 00, and that
Corporate Park Investors has indicated they need
3
May 15, 1990
STREETS more time to review the assessments. Wickstrom
noted that continuing this item to the next Council
LID 330 meeting would not create a problem. He asked that
if this item is held over, that the award of the bid
for this project also be held over. Wickstrom
determined for White that the LAKES portion of the
LID is not in bankruptcy. Upon Mann's question,
Wickstrom stated that the bike route is through the
Frager and Russell Road area, and that there is also
a bike route on James Street. He noted that the
Public Works Committee is aware that The Lakes
includes a bike route on both sides of those
streets, with the idea of tying that to S. 228th and
taking it over to Russell Road as the north-south
bike route.
Mayor Pro Tem/Council President Woods declared the
public hearing open. Jack Bennett, Corporate
Property Investors, 20206 72nd Avenue South, noted
that he has spoken with the Engineering Department
regarding their assessments (Nos. 21 and 22) . He
asked for additional time to evaluate the impact of
the assessments, since the final assessment roll
reflects a substantial increase over what was
previously budgeted, and requested a continuance of
the hearing until the next Council meeting.
Wickstrom clarified that Peterson's assessment is
for the traffic signal system. Peterson's letter
has been filed for the record. WHITE MOVED that
this hearing be continued until the June 5th
meeting. Houser seconded. The City Attorney noted
Council for White that next Council meeting will be held at
Meeting Sunnycrest Elementary School, 24629 42nd Avenue
Place South, on June 5th. Woods stated that the meeting
will begin at 6: 00 p.m. and that the subject of the
Nike Manor Nike Manor Housing would be the first order of
business. The motion carried.
(BIDS - ITEM 5B)
LID 330 - 64th Avenue Street Improvement. Bid
opening on this project was held April 17th, with
eight bids received. Since the public hearing on
this project was continued to the next Council
meeting, this item was removed from tonight's agenda
and will be presented on June 5th.
4
May 15, 1990
STREET VACATION (PUBLIC HEARING - ITEM 2A)
Street Vacation No. STV-90-3 - Portion of
78th Pl . S. This public hearing will consider a
request by South 202nd Associates of Bellevue to
vacate a portion of 78th P1. S. Proper legal notice
has been given by the City Clerk. Staff has
recommended approval without conditions.
Mayor Pro Tem/Council President Woods opened the
public hearing. There were no comments from the
audience and WHITE MOVED to close the public
hearing. Mann seconded and the motion carried.
JOHNSON MOVED to approve Street Vacation
No. STV-90-3 as recommended by staff and to direct
the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
ordinance. White seconded and the motion carried.
WATER (OTHER BUSINESS - ADDED ITEM 4E)
Kent Springs Transmission Main. Charles Kiefer of
the East Hill Citizens ' Alliance stated that he had
received answers to his questions at the Public
Works Committee meeting. He had not received an
answer to his May 3rd request that Harris withdraw
the DNS for this project. It was agreed that Kiefer
would make an appointment with Fred Satterstrom of
the Planning Department. Ron Allen stated that no
one had received his permission to drain the line
into his pond and asked the significance of the
drain valve. Wickstrom determined that the line
would not be drained into the pond and he would send
Allen a letter to that effect, and further, that we
are talking about a plan only. It was agreed that
the letter would be sent and then the plan studied.
TRAFFIC CONTROL (OTHER BUSINESS - ADDED ITEMS 4F AND 4G)
S. 272/277 Corridor.
Betty Taylor of 27627 127th SE, also a member of the
Alliance, stated that the City was attempting to
stifle East Hill residents, that proper notification
had not been given and that the plans were
constantly changed as to the selection of a route
for the corridor. She stated that Transportation
Engineer Nizlek had not allowed citizens to speak.
Upon Woods ' question, City Attorney Driscoll pointed
out that she had advised Council they should not
receive input from the public during the
environmental review process, in case they later had
to hear appeals.
5
May 15, 1990
TRAFFIC CONTROL Driscoll noted that the SEPA process could be
discussed only a general manner and that discussion
S. 272/277 of this particular project might lead to a potential
Corridor violation of the "appearance of fairness doctrine"
or a claim of that. Johnson objected to Taylor's
charge that proper hearings were not held, noting
that, in addition to the "scoping" hearing, the
Alliance itself had had a meeting and a real estate
firm had had another. He asked if there was
anything to prohibit scheduling something like a
scoping meeting for further input. Driscoll stated
that this could be done at a department level .
Wickstrom stated that the draft EIS should be issued
late in July and that prior to that, another meeting
would be held for which notice would be published
and also mailed to all who have signed up. Comments
on the draft are taken for 30 days, they are
answered and become a part of the draft EIS.
Driscoll noted that the law allows citizens to
petition for a public hearing in the draft. She
pointed out that no decisions have been made and
these would come to Council after the final EIS is
out, estimated to be late in 1990. The appeal
process then starts. Woods suggested that the City
provide maximum opportunity for public input all
along the way. Orr asked how many meetings were
held. Wickstrom noted the initial scoping meeting
and one formal meeting, with one more planned before
the draft is released.
Upon questions, Wickstrom determined that one
scoping meeting is required and that notice was
published in the paper as well as 4, 000 notices
mailed to individuals and that although the tapes
were garbled, minutes were available.
Taylor asked how the three suggested routes were
chosen of the 10 original alternatives. She said
that the Alliance questions the way this matter has
been handled from the very beginning. It was
determined that Council had been cautioned to
observe the "appearance of fairness" doctrine.
Taylor stated that many in the area were not
notified. White suggested that Taylor work with the
City Attorney' s staff to determine who should be
6
May 15, 1990
TRAFFIC CONTROL notified. Taylor asked if this would be called a
"scoping meeting" and Johnson noted that it was not
S. 272/277 necessary to start the SEPA process over inasmuch as
Corridor another hearing was to be held before the draft EIS
was issued. He pointed out that the information
gathering phase was still in process. He agreed
with White that the City was sensitive to notifying
the public, and often exceeded the legal
requirements in this area. He MOVED to direct staff
to set up another public meeting as part of this
process so staff can hear some of the concerns.
White seconded and stressed the importance of proper
notification. Mann proposed that the meeting be
videotaped and this was considered a friendly
amendment. Orr suggested that someone from the
City' s legal staff could attend the meeting to
explain why some questions were not proper. It was
clarified that Taylor was concerned with the
procedure, not necessarily with the project. Dowell
pointed out that the Council could not put itself in
the position of having heard arguments for or
against the project prior to the proper time for the
Council to consider this project. The motion was
restated by the City Clerk and then carried
unanimously.
Laurie Miller of 10997 SE 284th asked when the
citizens in the area of the proposed corridor should
have spoken. Johnson stated that this is a proposed
joint project with Auburn and this is the
information gathering process. Concerns could also
have been directed to King County. Wickstrom
determined further for Gay Fournier of
28261 108th SE that the SEPA process began at the
scoping hearing in October, 1989. She asked when
the Council became aware they should not discuss
this project. Driscoll noted that she had so
advised the Council when the petition was given to
the Clerk at the Council meeting of April 17 , 1990.
The Clerk will forward the petition to the
Department of Public Works as part of the draft EIS.
It was determined for Fournier that if the Council
members received mail on this subject, it should be
filed for the public record. Johnson noted he had
answered a letter of Fournier's but had cleared it
with the City Attorney' s office. Chris Clifford of
2721 Talbot Rd. S . , asked if information from the
7
May 15, 1990
TRAFFIC CONTROL next public meeting will be addressed in the draft
which is being prepared now. Wickstrom stated that
S . 272/277 if new information is submitted, the draft could be
Corridor delayed to include same. White noted that the
Council had to live within the rules and guidelines
established.
Bill JoV of 28183 109th SE, stated he had a letter
from Wickstrom and Nizlek containing a file list for
public disclosure - 272/277 dated April 16, 1990 .
He asked for the letter at the Public Works office
and learned that only those who requested
information on this project had received copies. He
had not been sent a copy and stated that he thought
all those concerned about the project should be sent
a copy. Wickstrom noted that the list was
approximately 400 names. HOUSER MOVED to send the
letter to all. White seconded and the motion carried.
HAZARDOUS (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C)
WASTE Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan - Resolution.
In compliance with State law, local governments are
to prepare a Local Hazardous Waste Plan. The
February 1989 Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan
for Seattle-King County is a joint plan for King
County and its cities, including Kent.
Wickstrom noted that the plan sets up programs and
facilities for the collection of hazardous waste
from households and from commercial-type operations
which generate small quantities of hazardous waste.
It also establishes a public education program, a
technical assistance program, a survey program, a
temporary subsidized program for small quantity
generators, and an enforcement program. He stated
that the goal is to keep hazardous waste out of
drainage and sewerage systems and landfills.
Wickstrom pointed out that the financial impact to
the City would be $102 , 000. He also noted that this
needs to be approved by June 1 in order to be
counted into the adoption of the plan. WHITE MOVED
to adopt Resolution 1222 approving the Local
Hazardous Waste Management Plan as amended and with
specific contingencies, as reflected in the Public
Works Director' s memorandum to the Public Works
Committee. Mann seconded. White said that though
the City is mandated to adopt the plan, they are
8
May 15, 1990
HAZARDOUS then faced with over $100, 000 in cost to the
WASTE citizens. He pointed out that this resolution would
give Suburban Cities a voice in what happens.
Wickstrom noted for Dowell that the increase will
appear on utility bills in 1991. The motion then
carried.
HOUSING (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D)
REMOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER DOWELL
Housing opportunity Fund Grant Application The
Planning Department requests AUTHORIZATION of an
Senior application for King County Housing Opportunity Fund
Citizen (HOF) money, to further the 92 unit Kent Senior
Housing Housing Bond Project. If awarded, the grant money
Bonds will enable the City to build additional senior
housing units for the frail elderly. Kent City
Council authorization of the application needs to be
forwarded to King County to be considered as part of
the application review.
Planning Manager Satterstrom clarified for Dowell
that if the City were to receive funds under this
grant, they would have the option of providing
congregate care within senior housing, and that the
exact type of care has not yet been determined.
DOWELL MOVED for passage of this item. White
seconded and the motion carried.
SUBDIVISION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E)
Walnut Grove Preliminary Subdivision No SU-90-2
AUTHORIZATION to set June 5 for a public meeting to
consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of
conditional approval of an application by
Kerr-Built, Inc. for a 22 lot single family
residential preliminary subdivision. The property
is approximately 6. 1 acres in size and is located
east of 94th Ave. S. , west of 96th Ave. S. , south of
S . 241st St. , and north of S. 243rd St.
ZONING CODE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J)
20% Multifamily Density Reduction ADOPTION of
Ordinance 2924 repealing Ordinance 2788 .
At the initiation of the Housing Element Work
Program, the City Council adopted Ordinance 2788 ,
which reduced multifamily residential densities by
20 percent. The ordinance was intended to be an
9
May 15, 1990
ZONING CODE interim measure to be in effect only until such time
as the Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Update was
completed and the accompanying zoning amendments
were enacted.
The Housing Element Study has been completed and as
a result the City Council passed ordinances 2901,
2902 , 2903 , 2904 , and Resolutions 1230 through 1237 .
These ordinances and resolutions obviate the need
for the interim measures enacted by Ordinance 2788 .
LIBRARY (BIDS - ITEM 5D)
Library - City/County. Jim Hansen noted that bids
for the new library were opened on May 14th. The
low bid was from Eberharter Construction Co. in the
amount of $2 ,524 , 000 for the base bid with
Alternatives 1, 2 , 3 , 7, & 8 and taxes bringing the
total up to $2 , 815, 150. The bid exceeds the budget
but it is recommended the City increase its budget
by $430, 000. McCarthy explained that the budget
change to cover this increase will be bourne by the
Library District since past budget changes based on
additional interest have inadvertently only
increased the City' s share. The total budget
interest of $413 , 159 should have reflected a like
interest in the Library District' s contribution.
HOUSER MOVED to modify the construction portion of
the overall Library Budget from $3 ,750, 000 to
$4 , 180 , 000 and to accept the bid of Eberharter
Construction Company for $2 ,524, 000 and Alternatives
1, 2 , 3 , 7 , & 8 and taxes totalling $2 , 815, 150.
Mann seconded. Dowell asked McCarthy if the entire
difference of $430, 000 was to be paid by the Library
District and he answered that it was. The motion
then carried.
SISTER CITY (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A)
Rent-Kherson Peace Park. The name of the Old City
Hall Park is being changed to Kent-Kherson Peace
Park in honor of Kent's Sister City. According to
Resolution 1049 , parks may be named giving
consideration to Sec. 3 .3 Criteria: historical or
cultural significance. Sec. 4 .3 Procedure: allows
for a six month time lapse between receipt of a name
proposal and the final recommendation. Due to
project timelines and volunteer involvement in the
building of the park, the Parks staff recommends
10
May 15, 1990
SISTER CITY waiving the six month period and accepting Kent-
Kherson Peace Park as the official name of the park.
Parks Director Wilson noted for White that
volunteers plan to build the park on June 2, 1990.
DOWELL MOVED to adopt Kent-Kherson Peace Park as the
official name of the park located at Second Ave. S .
and W. Gowe St. , formerly Old City Hall Park. White
seconded and the motion carried.
FIRE (BIDS - ITEM 5E)
Radio Tower system. Bid opening was held on May 14
with two bids received, both exceeding the project
estimate. Chief Angelo recommended that the bids be
rejected, the specifications rewritten, and the
project rebid. MANN SO MOVED. Dowell seconded and
the motion carried.
EQUIPMENT (BIDS - ITEM 5C)
RENTAL Aerator for Parks Golf Complex. Bid opening was
held April loth for a golf course greens aerator
with the only bid submitted by Western Equipment in
the amount of $10, 614 .34 . Staff recommends that
this bid be accepted. DOWELL SO MOVED. Mann
seconded. McCarthy noted for Houser that this item
is in the budget. The motion carried.
PUBLIC SAFETY (BIDS - ITEM 5A)
Writing Surfaces. One bid was received on
April 30, 1990 for writing surfaces for the East
Hill Complex. The bid was from Weyel International.
Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Weyel
International in the amount of $26,318. 18 . DOWELL
SO MOVED. Houser seconded and the motion carried.
PERSONNEL (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D)
AFSCME - Washington State Council of County and City
Employees, Local 21-K - Contract. Personnel
Director Olson announced that the City and AFSCME -
Union Washington State Council. of County and City
Employees, Local 21-K, have arrived at a settlement.
He pointed out that this is a first time ever
contract for employees of the City Finance
Department. Olson explained the provisions of the
contract. The Attorney advised, upon questions from
White and Woods, that it is not necessary for this
item to go to a committee for approval. MANN MOVED
that the contract be signed. Houser seconded and
the motion carried.
11
May 15, 1990
POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C)
Municipal Court Feasibility Study. ADOPTION of the
Interlocal Agreement between the Cities of Kent and
Auburn for a study of the feasibility of
establishing a municipal court. This study will be
done in conjunction with the City of Auburn, but
will specifically address the feasibility for each
individual city. The maximum amount of the contract
will be $8 , 000 to be split equally by the cities.
The report will be due to each city by July 16,
1990 .
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I)
Crime Prevention. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the donation
of $165 . 00 from Mitzel 's American Kitchens to the
D.A.R.E. program.
(OTHER BUSINESS - ADDED ITEM 4H)
Drug Free Zones. Johnson distributed copies of a
proposed resolution implementing enhanced penalties
for unlawful drug activities in areas around schools
and school bus route stops. HE MOVED that the
resolution be referred to the Public Safety
Committee. White seconded and the motion carried.
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B)
Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills
received through May 21, 1990 after auditing by the
Operations Committee at its meeting at 4 : 30 p.m. on
May 22 , 1990.
Approval of checks issued for vouchers•
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/1 - 5/10/90 91517 - 91549 $ 104, 938. 39
5/15/90 91550 - 92000 1 , 049 , 090. 18
$1, 154 , 028 .57
Approval of checks issued for payroll •
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/4/90 134975 - 135666 $882 , 654.20
12
May 15, 1990
FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G)
Banking Services Contract. AUTHORIZATION to accept
the proposal and to enter into contractual agreement
for banking services with U.S. Bank of Washington.
The agreement will be for a three year contract with
an option to extend. U.S. Bank was one of four
banks who submitted proposals and theirs offered the
lowest monthly cost to the City. The cost proposed
was $2 , 377 . 40 per month based on specified volumes.
This amount was approximately $470 per month less
than current charges. A contract between the City
and U.S . Bank will be reviewed by the City Attorney
prior to obtaining the Mayor's signature.
(CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H)
Golf Complex Merchandising Budget AUTHORIZATION of
a budget change for the expenditure of funds
Parks primarily to purchase golf merchandise and
AUTHORIZATION of a line of credit to cover deficit
cash positions.
At the May 1 Council meeting, the City Council
authorized the Parks Department to operate the golf
complex concessions from now through 1992 . In order
to implement this arrangement, a budget change
authorizing the expenditure of funds primarily to
purchase golf merchandise needs to be made. This
budget change of $241, 046 is offset by $342 ,456 in
additional revenues. In addition, a line of credit
loan is required up to $300, 000 to cover deficit
cash balances on a month to month basis.
REPORTS (REPORTS - ITEM 6B)
Council Chambers Repairs Hansen noted that this
item has been discussed in the past, and that
recently an alternative was developed which would
address just the minimum needs. He explained that
the alternative includes removing the dias from the
back of the room which would create space for a
meeting area, or could be used for additional
seating. It would also include removing one row of
benches so that a microphone could be placed in the
13
May 15, 1990
FINANCE center of the room for easier access for citizens
who wish to speak. This alternative also includes a
Council sound system, as the current sound system is faulty.
Chambers He explained that the cost would be $20,000, which
Repair includes new carpeting for the entire room.
(REPORTS - ITEM 6E)
Public Safety Committee. Mann invited everyone to
the dedication of the West Hill Fire Station at
26512 Military Road South. The ceremony will be on
May 19th at 11: 30 a.m.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
8en
arie enC
City Ck
14
Kent City Council Meeting
i Date June 5, 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CRIME PREVENTION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acknowledgement ofAcontribution to the
D.A.R.E. program from Hattie and David Dennis.
3 . EXHIBITS• None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO_ )<_ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL MOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety Bonds
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
(�Y Kent City Council Meeting
ryti Date June 5 . 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: COUNCIL ABSENCE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to excuse Councilmember
Woods from the June 5 meeting.
3 . EXHIBITS• memo
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO ✓ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:. $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JUDY WOODS, COUNCIL PRESIDENT
DATE: MAY 29 , 1990
SUBJECT: EXCUSED COUNCIL MEETING ABSENCE
Since I will be out of town on June 5th, the next_ City Council
meeting, I am requesting an excused absence from that meeting. I
will be attending the dedication of the Green River College in
Japan.
Thank you for considering this request.
JW: jb
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5, 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: LEWD CONDUCT ORDINANCE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approv&"Ordinance No. tlu ,' amending
Ordinance 2545, KCC 9 . 02 . 34 , relating to lewd conduct by adding
language to conform with case law. .
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Safety Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ _.._
SOURCE OF FUNDS: _
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
L Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5. 1990
�+
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE COLLECTION CONTRACT
r .,tip
i
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize the Mayor to sign c ntract with
Rabanco Companies extending the contract for collection of solid
waste within the City of Kent for nine more months under the
existing terms and conditions and rates.
3 . EXHIBITS: Contract
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION: -
i
Council Agenda `+
�� Item No. 3F
3�
SECOND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT
REGARDING SOLID WASTE HANDLING
This extension of the contract regarding solid waste handling is entered
into between the City of Kent, a Washington municipal corporation ("City") and
the Rabanco Companies, a Washington Partnership, dba Kent Disposal Company
("Contractor") .
Whereas, the City of Kent has authority to provide for public health,
safety and welfare pursuant to the Washington Constitution and, specifically,
for solid waste handling services as provided by state law; and
Whereas, from January 1, 1987, the Contractor provided solid waste
collection and disposal services within the City on a non-exclusive, interim
basis; and
Whereas, the City entered into a contract regarding solid waste handling
with the Contractor on September 29, 1989, and an extension of that contract
regarding solid waste handling on December 11 , 1989, copies of which are
attached and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibits A and B; and
Whereas, the City has determined that it is in the interest of the public
health, safety and welfare to continue and extend all terms and conditions of
this contract on a non-exclusive basis; NOW, THEREFORE,
In consideration of mutual benefits and promises herein, the parties
hereby agree as follows:
1 . The contract regarding solid waste handling (Exhibit A) shall be
extended for a period of nine months from the expiration date of the extension
of that contract dated December 11, 1989. (Exhibit B)
2. All terms and conditions as set forth in that contract shall continue
in full force and effect with all parties being bound thereto.
This Agreement is executed and dated this day of June, 1990.
CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON
By:
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
Attest:
Marie Jensen, City Clerk
THE RABANCO COMPANIES
By:
WARREN J. RAZORE, PRESIDENT
RABANCO LIMITED, INC.
CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Warren J. Razore
signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the
instrument, and acknowledged it as the President of Rabanco Limited, Inc. as
General Partner of the Rabanco Companies, a General Partnership, to be the
free and voluntary act of such general partnership for uses and purposes
mentioned in that instrument dated this day of 1990.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official
seal , the day and year first above written.
Notary Public in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
6025L-6L
ty
/5 l Kent City Council Meeting
yA) Date June 5. 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: MORTENSON ANNEXATION INITIAL ZONING NO. AZ-88-2
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set dates of June 19 and
August 7 for public hearings to consider the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation of initial zoning of R1-20 single family
residential (20, 000 square foot minimum lot size) for the
Mortenson Annexation No. AZ-86-2. The property is approximately
9 acres in size and is located in the vicinity of 98th Ave. So.
and So. 218th Street.
3 . EXHIBITS•
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner, 5/16/90
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
w
r �( 1 Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5, 1990
') Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE 1990-91 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
R
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Endorse the 1990-91 Human Services
Roundtable Legislative Agenda which contains the Roundtable's
priorities for the 1991 biennial session. The Legislative
Agenda is developed around the Roundtable's adopted action
agenda.
3 . EXHIBITS: Staff memo, Planning Committee minutes, Legislative
Agenda
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee, 5/15/90
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May 31, 1990
MEMO TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: LIN BALL, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE 1990-91 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
The 1990-1991 Legislative Agenda encompasses the Roundtable 's
priorities for the 1991 biennial session. A copy of the
Legislative Agenda is attached for your review. The Legislative
Agenda is developed around the Roundtable' s Action Agenda which was
endorsed by the City Council in the spring of last year. The
priorities of the Action Agenda are:
- Family Support
- Housing
- Child Care
- Job Training/Access/Support
- Health Care
Within each priority area, specific issues are categorized as 1st,
2nd, or 3rd Tier on the Legislative Agenda.
1st tier items will get the greatest amount of Roundtable time and
effort, with the Roundtable taking a leadership role in forming
coalitions, meeting with key decision-makers, testifying at
hearings, writing letters, telephoning, and working with a
legislative advisor.
2nd tier items will also receive major Roundtable support, working
with coalitions, testifying at hearings, writing letters and
telephoning.
3rd tier are items which the Roundtable supports, but will merely
monitor rather than invest time and effort.
The Planning Committee reviewed this item at its May 15 meeting and
recommends to the City Council endorsement of the 1990-1991 Human
Services Roundtable Legislative Agenda.
The Roundtable also endorsed the proposed agenda at its May 16
meeting and is asking for endorsement from the local jurisdictions '
City Councils.
Recommended Action
City Council endorsement of the Human Services Roundtable' s 1990-
91 Legislative Agenda as recommended by the Planning Committee on
May 15, 1990 .
LB:ca
Attachment
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF MEETING OF MAY 15, 1990 ,
Department of Transportation.
Mr. Satterstrom stated that staff is recommending City Council endorsement
of the Multiple Centers alternative. That alternative appears to recognize
the existing hierarchy of centers that are recognized by the King County
Comprehensive Plan and transportation element. While promoting cross-valley
corridors, it also highlights a commuter rail system in the valley. It seems
to be more reflective of existing growth patterns. Councilwoman Orr MOVED
and Councilwoman Houser SECONDED the motion to recommend the Multiple Centers
alternative to be placed on the June 5th City Council agenda under Other
Business. Motion carried. The City Council may elect to have a full staff
presentation on this project.
Ms. Byrne stated that Kent City Council members would be notified of the
PSCOG Assembly meeting which is to be held at the end of October. She
believes the PSCOG by-laws require 60-day advance notice of the meeting.
HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE 1990-1991 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
This was added to the agenda. Senior Planner Lin Ball distributed copies of
the proposed agenda. Present issues on the legislative agenda were developed
around the Roundtable' s action agenda of five priority areas: 1) Family
support, 2) housing, 3) child care, 4) job training, and 5) health care. The
agenda has been incorporated into the Suburban Cities agenda and it is
anticipated it will be incorporated into the AWC agenda as well in order to
present a unified front. Each priority area has specific action issues rated
in tier levels. The Roundtable is seeking local City Council support and
endorsement of the legislative agenda. Councilwoman Orr MOVED and
Councilwoman Houser SECONDED the motion to recommend to the City Council
endorsement of the Human' Services Roundtable legislative agenda, which issue
will be placed on the City Council Consent. Calendar of June 5 . Motion
carried.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5 : 10 PM.
4
SFR�r
J 0
Z �
1220 Smith Tower Seattle, Washington 98104 �206) 623-7134
w
��ND'I P�~
HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE
Robert Roegner, Mayor
City of Auburn PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE AGENDA FOR 1990-91
Jean Carpenter, Councilmember
City of Bellevue
Bob Davis, Councilmember
City of Bothell
Avo Frisinger, Councilmember
City of Issaquah Items on the Legislative Agenda are grouped according to the categories
Judy Woods, Councilmember of the Roundtable's Action Agenda. Within each area, specific issues are
City of Kent listed. Each issue indicates whether it is to be pursued at,the federal,
Tim Hill
King County Executive state or regional level and is placed in one of the following categories:
Audrey Gruger, Councilmember
King County Council
Roger Salisbury, Counctmember
City of Kirkland First Tier: Items for which the Roundtable will use
Judy Clibborn, Courcilmember legislative adviser resources, will take a
City of Mercer Island leadership role in forming coalitions, will meet
Marchione, Mayor
f Redmond with key decision-makers, will testify at hearings
Toni Nelson, Councilmember and will send messages by letter and telephone.
City of Renton
Norman B. Rice, Mayor
City of Seattle Second Tier: Items for which the Roundtable will testify at
Tom Weeks, Councilmember hearings and send messages by letter and
Seattle City Council telephone. The Roundtable will work with
Clarence Moriwvki, Councilmember
City of Tukwila coalitions which have taken the lead on these
Bruce M. Pym, Chair items,
United Way of King County
Third Tier: Items which the Roundtable supports and will
monitor.
The legislative committee, with the help of a legislative adviser, will
develop a specific approach and strategy for each agenda issue from June
to September.
Proposed 1990-91 Legislative Agenda Page 2
FINANCING OPTIONS FOR HUMAN SERVICES
First Tier
• Raise the priority of and obtain funding for human services in the State
legislature (State)
FAMILY SUPPORT
First Tier
• Restore the Family Independence Program to its original fifteen active
sites (State)
• Revise laws and increase funding for family violence programs pursuant
to recommendations of the Roundtable's Family Violence Project (State
and Regional)
Second Tier
• Increase welfare grant amounts (State)
HOUSING
First Tier
• Establish permanent source of funding for the Housing Trust Fund
(State)
• Broaden ability of local governments to generate housing-related
revenues through additional local options (State)
• Pursue recommendations of the Roundtable on placing a regional
housing funding package on the ballot (Regional)
Second Tier
• Require owners of federally-assisted housing projects to offer a right of
first refusal to non-profit purchasers when the property is placed on the
market for sale (State)
• Advocate passage of current use valuation on the fall 1990 ballot
(Regional)
Proposed 1990-91 Legislative Agenda Page 3
CHILD CARE
First Tier
• Provide State funding for child care resource and referral agencies
(State)
Second Tier
• Increase slots for employment child care (State)
o Child care for homeless families (State)
Third Tier
o Monitor Federal child care bill and its regional effect (Federal)
JOB TRAINING, JOB ACCESS, and WORKER SUPPORT
Second Tier
• Furnish local governments with labor statistics gathered by the State
(State)
Third Tier
o Encourage State involvement in job training programs (State)
o Amend Federal Job Training Partnership Act allocation formula
(Federal)
HEALTH CARE
Second Tier
• Fund alternatives to hospitalization for people with AIDS (Federal)
Third Tier
o Monitor interim reports and activities of the Commission on Health
Care Access and Cost Containment (State)
Kent City Council Meeting
` �� Date June 5. 1990
{V Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: KENT SPRINGS IMPROVEMENTS PHASE 1
i
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accepj as completeiik& contract with
R. W. Scott for Kent Springs Improvements Phase 1, and release
of retainage after receipt of the necessary state releases.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Director of Public Works.
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO �< _ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
.3A
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 31, 1990
TO: Mayor Kelleher an City Council
FROM: Don Wickstrom
RE: Kent Springs Improvements Phase I
The contract for this project was awarded to R.W. Scott
Construction Company in October, 1989 for the bid amount of
$135, 087 . 17 .
The project constructed a foot bridge across Jenkins Creek,
sliplined approximately 450 feet of existing gravity water main and
installed a new flow control valve at our Kent Springs source.
Final construction costs are $133 , 098 . 13 .
It is recommended this project be accepted as complete and the
retainage released after receipt of the releases from the State.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5 . 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: COUNTRY HILLS APARTMENTS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of the bill of sale and
warranty agreement submitted by Country Hills joint venture
(P. Henley and Associates, Inc. ) for continuous operation and
maintenance of approximately 1, 351 feet of sanitary sewer
extension constructed in the vicinity of 132nd Ave. S.E. and
Kent-Kangley Rd. for the Country Hills apartment project, and
release of cash bond after expiration of the one year
maintenance period.
3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:—
ACTION:—
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
COUNTRY HILLS APTS
5E i�TM i
ox
a .. 1
T sour-
- Zc SE 36110 1'R -
{ QQ � SE263R STi. •
N ..ANC • '. 7r rL ' - sca+JaO
2"TN rr, a».TN { S r_ I" � - a. SE
)MTN n M•r�dssaw !. a .^ "";�,
STr ti.
r mw . ..�.
Ey
KAN
GL
a�
se
E
SE-VTTT1 sr-9m PC — — — — —
� n
>7 r = N
u
n
'Rw AM ST g SE 290T
34
35 W
. I sE sago .
tSE �BeTM 22, .i ST' fE7Pn1=>T
2 N:
DW
SE'29200 s
SE ST
! ( /
——� — — SE 2MTH ST_ -- SSE 296TM sT
SE 300TM STST
C
_ N WON R
J
t{
>` N` 4
R t{ E �
TM I =
Q _ rt1 Kent City Council Meeting
�Lv Date June 5, 1990
x Category Consent Calendar
•i,
1. SUBJECT: JOSEY GLEN PLAT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of the bill of sale and
warranty agreement submitted by Lakeridge Development Company
for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 240
feet of water main extension, 653 feet of sanitary sewer
extension, 680 feet of street improvements, and 540 feet of
storm sewer improvements constructed in the vicinity of 112th
Ave. S.E. and S.E. 232nd for the Josey Glen Plat development,
exemption from the one year maintenance period, and immediate
release of the cash bond.
3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONN-EL IMPACT: NO X _ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3K
Wi{liili81t9ttt ., M'tw"'9ww .'�'p.• ••••..,�,�. ,n.• .. _.. __.. ......
t W IA
rri p• �l J' c...i'1[1
6 E I S.[/
LI ` firZ% ;S( 116T11
< IS w .�TgZF, Y l�0 226TH S1
>EZ ' ,i `ItlTit Pl x ti 6E 217TH
-
SE tH F6
bL
Y i RA TI
3L () 1CMARr) �'\ t SE *1
xSF11�11T5T t� L,.P; C S7
4 _ 14i� NORfN SE isl1
$E n2ND ST� � 4. •, e` 6 � i SE ��Sc
ST F z MtR lllAN SE 13tr1U�>
i PARK
i W PL ti r212ND o �i SE_i 23)RD Sr
RD A HE
236 � V i l i DI SE H ST SE 231T
— yE 1 >
1 51 - JR N$ V)
tL]w <
TH PL
H
> ?G > X
I
Y I< tfL MTH P
I 4!w 240TH
109
1l It 4
ui
': rr Clark
<
�TH
i
Lake
Vl(Ag;`klNl MAP
C-% A i r "
JOSEY GLEN PLAT
Kent City Council Meeting
�v Date June 5 1990
Y Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: VEHICLE REGISTRATION FEE/TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS - RESOLUTION
2 •/ —S s recommended by the Public Works k'
Co _A
Committee iproval of Resolution No. supporting and
requesting hat the County implement the vehicle registration 1
fee the State has authorized via the gas tax legislation. i
es fiy the Ci y A� tL-
Dr eT-,at-- h ,,
e ting.
3 . EXHIBITS: Excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes of
4/17/90.
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
-
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3L
Public Works Committee
April 17 , 1990
Page 2
The Committee asked for a report from the Police Department in two
months.
Traffic Signal Complaints - Ralph Rice
Mr. Rice expressed concern about the pedestrian cross walk signals.
The push buttons seem to be maintenance problems; he has seen kids
take baseball bats to them and the signals are confusing especially
to older pedestrians . Mr. Rice suggested a simple solution to a
lot of problems would be to take the push buttons off and connect
the "Don't Walk" light up to the red and yellow lights on the
vehicular signal, connect the "Walk" light to the green light on
the vehicular signal . Dowell suggested staff discuss this proposal
and send Mr. Rice a letter with the results. Marty Nizlek stated
that he and Mr. Rice have been working together on monitoring a
number of locations that Mr. Rice frequents. White asked about any
State or Federal regulations that require the pedestrian signals
and requested that Nizlek inform the Committee what they are.
Nizlek added these problems are recognized nation wide.
Transportation Improvement Board Vehicle Registration Fee
Wickstrom stated that one of the local options of the gas tax
legislation is a vehicle registration fee that could be instituted
County-wide by County Council ordinance. In order to implement
that option, the County is seeking concurrence from the Cities that
they would support the fee. Wickstrom stated he felt we should do
so to help finance the City' s projects. The fee would generate
approximately $322 , 000 for the City of Kent. Wickstrom added the
revenue generated can be used for road projects only. White asked
if we could use this to retire bonds. Wickstrom stated the City
doesn' t have sufficient Councilmanic bonding capacity available to
raise the matching funds. The Committee unanimously recommended
approval. for a letter to be sent to the County supporting
implementation of the vehicle registration fee.
Other Items
Mr. Kiefer asked about the response to the questions he asked at
Council . Gill replied that staff is in the process of preparing
a written response. We have met with the Fisheries Department at
the project site and Mr. Kiefer was in attendance. The meeting
with the Corps of Engineers is set for Wednesday. Gill stated that
once we have met with them we will have a better idea what course
of action.
I
City of Kent, Washington
Kent Public Works Committee
Date April 17 , 1990
Category
1. SUBJECT:
TIB Vehicle Registration Fee
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT:
One of the local options available through the new gas tax
legislation is a vehicle registration fee ($15 per vehicle per
year.
Said fee must be implemented County-wide and can be
implemented simply by King County Council passing an ordinance
per same. To do so, however, King County needs letters from
the City' s supporting same. Over the past years, King
County ' s Task Force on Transportation Financing Strategies,
in which Kent has participated, has studied the needs and the
available revenue sources. The shortfall between said needs
and revenues is considerable - exceeding $4 billion between
the years 1988-2000 . Implementing this fee would not
significantly narrow this gap (estimated to generate
$171, 000, 000 between 1990-2000) . It would, however, be a
start. Kent ' s direct share of the fee would be approximately
$322 , 000 per year. This would help towards meeting the City ' s
financial obligation associated with the anticipated TIB grant
funded projects .
The Public Works Department recommends that a support letter
be sent.
3 . EXHIBITS :
Material on Vehicle Registration Fee
Memorandum from Don Wickstrom
4 . RECOMMENDED BY :
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE• Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED•
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
l
�� . Kent City Council Meeting
�} Date June 5. 1990
/ Category Other Business
SUBJECT: WALNUT GROVE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION NO. SU-90-2
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This meeting will consider the Hearing
Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of an
application by Kerr-Built, Inc. for a 22-lot single family
residential preliminary subdivision. The property is
approximately 6. 1 acres in size and is located east of
94th Ave. So. , west of 96th Ave. So. , south of So. 241st Street
and north of So. 243rd Street
r
3 . EXHIBITS: Staff memo, staf report, Hearing Examiner minutes,
findings and recommendatio
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Hearinct E aminer 5 2 90
(Committee, Staff, Exa finer, Commission, etc. )
Approval with seven cond tions.
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERSO L IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION ,
Councilmember f '�, y moves, Councilmember _ seconds
To approve/ the findings of the Hearing
Examiner and to adoptyj76?q&k% the Hearing Examiner's
recommendation of approval of the Walnut Grove Preliminary )
Subdivision No. SU-90-2 with seven conditions. ---
y
DISCUSSION• Y t
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May 31, 1990
TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: WALNUT GROVE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION #SU-90-2
On April 18, 1990 the Kent Hearing Examiner held a public hearing
to consider an application by Kerr-Built, Inc. for a 22-lot
residential preliminary subdivision. The property is approximately
6. 1 acres in size and is located east of 94th Avenue S. , west of
96th Avenue S. , south of S. 241st Street, and north of S. 243rd
Street. The property is zoned R1-7 .2 and R1-9 . 6 Single-Family
Residential .
On May 2 , 1990 the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of this
preliminary subdivision with the following conditions:
A. Prior to recordation of the final plat:
1. Comply with all applicable SEPA conditions.
2 . Provide detailed engineering drawings, obtain City
approval of them, and either bond for or construct the
following:
a. Provide gravity sanitary sewer service to all lots.
Main line sewer extensions shall be made from
94th Avenue S. and S. 241st Street southerly to S .
242nd Street and then easterly along S. 242nd Street
to 96th Avenue S. Also extend sanitary sewers to
southeast corner of the subject property to allow
a future extension easterly along S. 243rd Street.
b. Extend City water to provide adequate domestic and
fire flows to service all lots. Minimum six-inch
water mains are required. Loop system from S. 241st
Street and 96th Avenue S. to connect with water main
at 94th Avenue S . and S. 242nd Street. Also extend
water main to southeast corner of the subject
property to allow future connection with the water
main on S. 242nd Street and 96th Avenue S.
(extended) .
C. All interior streets and cul-de-sacs (i.e. proposed
S . 242nd Street shall be fully improved with asphalt
pavement (32 feet in width for S. 242nd Street, and
28 feet in width for the cul-de-sac) , curb and
gutter, sidewalks, drainage system, street lighting,
underground utilities and related appurtenances.
Minimum curb return radii shall be 45 feet for cul-
de-sacs and 25 feet at other street intersections.
Provide street name signs for all streets shown on
the plat map.
3 . Dedicate all necessary property for the construction of
road improvements as required in the SEPA conditions and
plat conditions. Grant all necessary on-site and off-
site easements for the construction and maintenance of
the utility improvements required under SEPA and as noted
above. NOTE: The barricade that exists at 96th Avenue
South and South 241st Street shall not be removed without
express authorization of the City Engineer following
notice to surrounding residents and opportunity to
comment.
B. Prior to or in conjunction with the issuance of any
development permit for any lot:
Construct all on-site and off-site improvements
required as SEPA conditions and plat conditions.
C. Prior to the issuance of the first development permit,
including the grade and fill permit for any road improvements:
Record with the King County Department of Records the
tentative lot line adjustment for the Franks and McGrew
property.
CA:JPH:ca
Attachment
i
FI 1 I I �r
_S 941 ST _5TUl
10 18 SF
7225 SF 8960 S o 0 I Y)
V 8960 SF m
s n /1 11 - 1 I w
aa�
CO MUNITY 7} P
,A .(IPARK
10,69 SF 2 S
I 7 390 SF 7 + i 3 y0
77 70 r }
7570 F n 7220`SF 7 20 SF
7250 8700 S 9801 SF \\ I
1 2 3 4 0 5 0 6 0 915 Fn 8357 SF \I _
7
} I 5 70 73 36
J8 � 0 65 I
I
� I P OPOSED S 242ND STR ET -
40
� r 35 2 60 7 4n
na
11,11 690 SF I t5' 9750 SF 9800 SF
14 r 15 21 m 2
M
H
C 77 61 g'61, 3 \70
-T 10,06 16 2 \5 F o 10,763 SF�
/ 'B1
1 SD ES? T
17 2 18 19
13,960 SF 652 SF 12,220SF
-- 725 117
5 � M
P�
Q�
GJ .
15 SEMENT FOR BIOFILTRATION DITCH
APPLICATION NAME: Walnut Grove
NUMBER: SU-90-2 DATE: June 5) 1990
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat 2
LEGEND
Application site
zjITE PLAN Zoning boundary
City limits
plot to Su(L
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF KENT
FILE NO: WALNUT GROVE #SU-90-2
APPLICANT: KERR-BUILT, INC.
REOUEST: A request for approval of a 22-lot residential
preliminary plat.
LOCATION: The subject property is located east of
94th Avenue S . , west of 96th Avenues. , south of
S. 241st Street and north of S. 243rd Street.
APPLICATION FILED: 2/20/90
DEC. OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
ISSUED• 12/28/89
MEETING DATE: 4/18/90
RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: 5/2/90
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL with conditions
STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Department
Kathy McClung, Planning Department
Carol Proud, Planning Department
Gary Gill, Public Works Department
PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Andy Rykels, representative
Other
Claudia Otey
Dave Anderson
Carolyn Nirk
Kathy Wilerson
Pam Leaf
Peter Curran
Jeff Applegate
WRITTEN TESTIMONY: None
INTRODUCTION
After due consideration of all the evidence presented at public hearing
on the date indicated above, and following an unaccompanied personal
1
Findings and Recommendation
Walnut Grove
#SU-90-2
inspection of the subject property and surrounding area by the Hearing
Examiner at a time prior to the public hearing, the following findings,
conclusions and recommendation are entered by the Hearing Examiner on
this application.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The applicant requests a recommendation of approval for a 22
lot residential subdivision. The subject property abuts the
east side of 94th Avenue South and the west side of 96th Avenue
South, south of S. 241st Street. The property is approximately
6. 1 acres. The property is currently divided into three
separate parcels owned by two separate persons. If lot line
adjustments are approved, the proposed subdivision would include
lots A and B of the Franks lot line adjustment and Lot C of the
McGrew lot line adjustment.
2 . The City-wide Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property
as SF, Single Family. The East Hill Comprehensive Plan
designates the property as SF 6, Single Family with 4 to 6 units
per acre. Zoning on the property north of South 242nd Street
is R1-7 . 2 and zoning on the property to the south of South 242nd
Street is R1-9 . 6 . The average lot size proposed in the R1-7 . 2
zone is 8 , 570 square feet. The average lot size proposed in the
R1-9 . 6 zone is 10, 779 square feet. overall, the subdivision,
if approved, would provide for 22 single family homes at a
density of 3 . 6 units per acre.
3 . The subject property is currently undeveloped. The topography
of the site is relatively level . The property surrounding the
site is almost exclusively residential.
4 . An existing eight-inch water main is available to serve the site
with water service from the City of Kent. Existing sanitary
sewer service is also available on an eight-inch sewer main in
South 241st Street. Storm water drainage improvements are
needed to provide for adequate drainage of the site. The lots
will have access to several streets. Street improvements are
needed to help assure a smooth flow of traffic and to mitigate
adverse traffic impacts that might otherwise occur.
5. A Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued by the
City on this proposal on January 12 , 1990 subject to conditions
related to tree preservation, storm drainage, road improvements,
traffic studies, and the location of a park within the
subdivision.
2
Findings and Recommendation
Walnut Grove
#SU-90-2
6. Several current residents in the area surrounding the proposed
subdivision appeared at the public hearing. No one testified
in opposition to the proposal, but a number of questions and
concerns were raised. These included concerns about the
extension of 96th Avenue South; tree preservation; the need for
sidewalks along South 242nd and South 241st Streets; the
potential for a LID assessment against current residents; a
concern about the possible removal of the barricade at the
corner of 96th Avenue South and South 241st Street; a question
about hook-up to the sewer system; a concern about the
development of the southern line of the subject property;
concerns about the type of homes that might be constructed; and
traffic concerns.
7 . The applicant and the City addressed most concerns and questions
raised at the public hearing. The representative of the
applicant specifically noted agreement with the park dedication
and stated that the southern area of the proposed subdivision
would be a biofiltration swale with no fence planned.
Representatives of the City noted the requirement to comply with
the tree preservation ordinance, the SEPA conditions as to
traffic improvements, and the unlikelihood of an extension of
96th Avenue South.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The purpose of the subdivision regulations, as expressed in the
Kent Subdivision Code (which includes the requirement for
preliminary plat approval) , is to:
provide rules, regulations, requirements, and
standards for subdividing land in the City of
Kent, insuring that the highest feasible
quality in subdivision will be attained; that
the public health, safety, general welfare,
and aesthetics of the City of Kent shall be
promoted and protected; that orderly growth,
development, and the conservation, protection
and proper use of land shall be insured; that
proper provisions for all public facilities . .
. shall be made; that maximum advantage of
site characteristics shall be taken into
consideration; that conformance with
provisions set forth in the City of Kent
Zoning Code and Kent Comprehensive Plan shall
be insured.
3
Findings and Recommendation
Walnut Grove
#SU-90-2
The Kent Subdivision Code sets forth the particular requirements
for an application for preliminary plat approval. The Code
details nine specific requirements that must be met before a
preliminary plat can be recommended for approval.
Based on the Findings detailed above, and with the conditions
recommended in the Decision below, the application will conform
to the standards set forth in City ordinances and should be
APPROVED.
2 . It is necessary to apply certain conditions to approval of this
application in order to assure conformance with the standards
set forth in City ordinances. Specifically, conditions related
to traffic patterns and impacts, drainage systems, tree
preservation, public utilities and park space are necessary to
detail activities required of the applicant as conditions to
approval of the preliminary plat.
DECISION
The preliminary plat application should be APPROVED subject to the
following conditions:
A. Prior to recordation of the final plat:
1. Comply with all applicable SEPA conditions.
2 . Provide detailed engineering drawings, obtain City approval
of them, and either bond for or construct the following:
a. Provide gravity sanitary sewer service to all lots.
Main line sewer extensions shall be made from
94th Avenue S . and S. 241st Street southerly to S.
242nd Street and then easterly along S. 242nd Street
to 96th Avenue S. Also extend sanitary sewers to
southeast corner of the subject property to allow a
future extension easterly along S. 243rd Street.
b. Extend City water to provide adequate domestic and
fire flows to service all lots. Minimum six-inch
water mains are required. Loop system from S . 241st
Street and 96th Avenue S. to connect with water main
at 94th Avenue S . and S . 242nd Street. Also extend
water main to southeast corner of the subject property
4
Findings and Recommendation
Walnut Grove
#SU-90-2
to allow future connection with the water main on
S. 242nd Street and 96th Avenue S. (extended) .
C. All interior streets and cul-de-sacs (i.e. proposed
S . 242nd Street shall be fully improved with asphalt
pavement (32 feet in width for S. 242nd Street, and
28 feet in width for the cul-de-sac) , curb and gutter,
sidewalks, drainage system, street lighting,
underground utilities and related appurtenances .
Minimum curb return radii shall be 45 feet for cul-
de-sacs and 25 feet at other street intersections.
Provide street name signs for all streets shown on the
plat map.
3 . Dedicate all necessary property for the construction of
road improvements as required in the SEPA conditions and
plat conditions. Grant all necessary on-site and off-site
easements for the construction and maintenance of the
utility improvements required under SEPA and as noted
above. NOTE: The barricade that exists at 96th Avenue
South and South 241st Street shall not be removed without
express authorization of the City Engineer following notice
to surrounding residents and opportunity to comment.
B. Prior to or in conjunction with the issuance of any development
permit for any lot:
Construct all on-site and off-site improvements
required as SEPA conditions and plat conditions.
C. Prior to the issuance of the first development permit, including
the grade and fill permit for any road improvements:
Record with the King County Department of Records the
tentative lot line adjustment for the Franks and
McGrew property.
Dated this 2nd day of May, 1990.
THEODORE PAUL HUNTER
Hearing Examiner
5
Findings and Recommendation
Walnut Grove
#SU-90-2
APPEALS FROM HEARING EXAMINER DECISIONS.
Request of Reconsideration
Any aggrieved person may request a reconsideration of a decision by the
Hearing Examiner if either (a) a specific error of fact, law, or
judgment can be identified or (b) new evidence is available which was
not available at the time of the hearing. Reconsideration requests
should be addressed to: Hearing Examiner, 220 Fourth Avenue S. , Kent,
WA 98032 . Reconsiderations are answered in writing by the Hearing
Examiner.
Notice of Right to Appeal
The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final unless a written appeal
to the Council is filed by a party within 14 days of the decision.
The appeal must be filed with the City Clerk. Usually, new information
cannot be raised on appeal . All relevant information and arguments
should be presented at the public hearing before the City Council .
A recommendation by the Hearing Examiner to the City Council can also
be appealed. A recommendation is sent to the City Council for a final
decision; however, a public hearing is not held unless an appeal is
filed.
6
City of Kent - Planning Department
III
l /
\ 1\1 \ 1 1 1\\\ \I 1 (%I\
( \
c
.,1 /
1
a I
,/ ( :; "'r' i#r: /i:is ?5 Ili
. y.. .. ..... . ..
APPLICATION NAME: Walnut Grove
NUMBER: SU-90-2 DATE: April 18, 1990
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat
LEGEND
Application site
ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP Zoning boundary
City limits ''�`
City of Kent - Planning Department
70— —75— 70
10,18✓3 SF � ' o
" �• 7225 SF 0
8960 SF 8960 S 0
13 12 r 11 o?
I "UNI 73 1 R POOH
CO MUNITI 1 T k
(IPARK r 7 10,69 SF
I 7239D $F q 41
77 70 43 ( I ° o0
7570 F o 7220`SF 7250 � 7 20 S; 8700 S g801 SF \ 1
1 2 `` 3 r `4 0 5 0 6 0 915 7 F 8387 SF
I� 3� 70 73 36 \
78 0 65
72.
I
]I P OPOSED S 242ND STR ET A — —
QI - - --I- - 40 R
11 36
EXII 35 2 � BO 7$ r'
\ 9 I.s
C 111,11 F 690 SF 9750 SF 9800 SF
\ - 14 n 15 21
M \
I
77 61
� �.h� 3 70
122
10,065 F 10,76QOSF�
16 J0 30 2 \
1 / 1 SO ES T �'1
I /1 17 16 19
13,960 SF 652 SF 12.220SF
_ _
— . — . —. — . 125� _11.7 - -1 29
P�
P�
GJ .
15' SD EASEMENT FOR BIOFILTRATION DITCH
APPLICATION NAME: Walnut Grove
NUMBER: SU-90-2 DATE: April 18, 1990
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat
LEGEND
Application site
SITE PLAN Zoning boundary
City limits
PLEASE NOTE: These minutes are prepared only for the
convenience of those interested in the proceedings of the
Land Use Hearing Examiner. These minutes are not part of the
official record of decision and are not viewed, referred to,
or relied upon by the Hearing Examiner in reaching a decision.
These minutes also are not part of the record of review in the
event a decision of the Hearing Examiner is appealed. Copies
of the tape recordings of the Hearing Examiner proceedings,
or a complete written transcript of these recordings, are
available at a charge from the City of Kent. Please contact
Chris Holden at the Kent Planning Department (859-3390) if you
are interested in obtaining an official transcript.
HEARING EXAMINER MINUTES
April 18, 1990
The public hearing of the Kent Hearing Examiner was called to order by the
presiding officer, Ted Hunter, Hearing Examiner, on Wednesday, April 18, 1990
at 3 : 00 p.m. in the Kent City Hall, Council Chambers.
Mr. Hunter requested all those intending to speak at the hearing and those
wishing to receive information concerning the hearing, to sign in at the sign
up sheet by the door. Staff reports and agendas were available by the door.
Ir. Hunter briefly described the sequence and procedure of the hearing. Each
person presenting testimony was sworn in by Mr. Hunter prior to giving
testimony.
WALNUT GROVE
Preliminary Plat
#SU-90-2
A request by Kerr-Built Inc. , 6625 S . 190th Street, #B100, Kent, WA 98032 ,
for approval of a 22-lot residential preliminary plat. The zoning for the
property is R1-7 . 2 , Single-Family Residential and R1-9.6, Single-Family
Residential. The subject property is located east of 94th Avenue S . , west
of 96th Avenue S . , south of S. 241st Street and north of S. 243rd Street.
Carol Proud, Planning Department, presented the staff report. Ms. Proud
showed some view foils depicting 1) the location of the site; 2) the site
plan of the project and 3) the zoning of the property and surrounding area.
A video of the site was shown.
Ms. Proud commented a Determination of Nonsignficance was issued in January
1990 with conditions. Ms. Proud commented on the goals, objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive and Valley Floor Plans. Ms. Proud remarked the
developer will donate to the City for park purposes an area in the northwest
corner of the plat. The City staff recommends approval.
1
Hearing Examiner Minutes
April 18 , 1990
Mr. Hunter asked if the applicant would like to comment.
Andy Rykels, Rykels Engineering, remarked the project is consistent with the
City' s Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. Mr. Rykels asked for approval of
this preliminary plat application.
Mr. Hunter asked if there was anyone else who would like to comment.
Claudia Otev, 9506 S. 241st, asked why the setback for the south area was
not made to allow the future development of 96th. Ms. Otey commented there
were other plats that have been developed in the area where the streets were
never completed; one plat developed one-half of a street, then a plat would
be developed across the half-street and the street wasn't completed. Ms.
Otey felt this should not happen with this plat. Ms. Otey felt that as many
of the trees as possible should be saved. Ms. Otey asked if sidewalks were
being required.
Dave Anderson asked if there were any means of continuing the barricade
system to prevent the street from being a through street. The barricade is
on the corner of 96th and 241st.
Carolyn Nirk, 9647 S. 241st, Kent, WA 98031, asked if there were plans to
remove the barricade. Ms. Nirk stated a light was put in at 248th and Benson
which increased the traffic on 248th. Ms. Nirk commented if 241st became a
through street, it would be used by people to go to the stop light located
at 94th.
Mr. Hunter asked for some responses to the questions.
Ms. Proud commented the plat will be improved with sidewalks. Ms. Proud
commented the tree preservation ordinance will require a tree plan and trees
will be saved wherever possible.
Kathy Wilkerson asked if there will be sewer extensions.
Pam Leaf, 24111 94th Avenue S . , Kent, WA 98031, asked if the homes would be
one or two stories in height.
Peter Curran had some concerns about development in the area.
Jeff Applegate, 24318 94th Avenue, wondered what type of plans or separation
is planned for the plat. Mr. Applegate also had some concerns about the
traffic.
Gary Gill , City Engineer, commented 96th Avenue S. between 241st and 242nd
would be considered a potential full street. The developer is only being
required to construct half-street improvements. Mr. Gill commented that east
2
Hearing Examiner Minutes
Xpril 18, 1990
of 96th Avenue S. , on 241st, it is mostly public right of way. Mr. Gill felt
that the barricade would probably stay in place. Mr. Gill commented LID
assessments are used for doing full street improvements. In this instance,
the City is requiring LID covenants for future larger-scale projects if
created. However, in order for an LID to be formed there has to be a
significant interest on the part of adjacent property owners to wholly or
partially pay for those improvements.
Mr. Rykels commented a combination of one and two-story homes is being
proposed. Mr. Rykels stated the southern boundary will have a biofiltration
swale which will leave the property and go out to 94th Avenue. There are no
plans for a fence or other barrier along the southern boundary of the
property. Mr. Rykels commented there will be curb and gutter on the roads
within the plat but 94th Avenue from James Street to the subdivision will be
widened with a gravel shoulder; the northern half of 241st will be overlayed
for a twelve-foot width. In addition there will be an eight-foot gravel
shoulder from the western boundary of the plat to 94th.
There was no further comments.
The hearing was closed at 3 : 45 pm.
WASSER HIGH TECH COATING, INC.
Conditional Use Permit
#CE-90-3
A public hearing to consider the request by William J. Brinton, 1048 W. James
Street, #101, Kent, WA 98032 , for a conditional use permit to allow more than
20, 000 pounds of hazardous materials on-site at any given time in an M3 ,
General Industrial, zone. The facility would be located at 8041 S. 228th
#103 .
Mary Duty, Planning Department, presented the staff report. Ms. Duty pointed
out that the applicant manufactures corrosion-resistant paint, it is not sold
to the general public. Ms. Duty showed some view foils depicting 1) the
location of the site, 2) the zoning of the site and the surrounding area and
3) a diagram showing the building. Ms. Duty commented this property is fully
developed and no exterior changes are proposed. Ms. Duty commented on
Criterion 7 regarding performance standards. Ms. Duty addressed the 50 foot
setback requirement for hazardous wastes. Ms. Duty submitted to the record
a letter from the City defining the official interpretation of the 50 foot
setback requirement for hazardous waste (Exhibit 2) . Staff recommends
approval.
Mr. Hunter asked for clarification of Condition 3 regarding the providing of
information.
3
Hearing Examiner Minutes
April 18 , 1990
Larry Webb, Fire Marshal, stated that under Sara Title III the information
is to be provided annually.
Mr. Hunter asked if the applicant would like to comment.
Bill Brinton, President and owner of Wasser High Tech Coatings, gave a brief
outline of how the facility will be operated. Mr. Brinton remarked the
facility will be operated safely.
There was no further testimony.
The public hearing closed at 4 : 05 pm.
HUNTERS POINT
Shoreline Management and Rezone
#SMA-90-2 AND #RZ-90-1
A public hearing to consider the requests by Hunter' s Pointe Apartments,
Inc. , 33442 First Way S . , Federal Way, WA 98003 , for a shoreline management
substantial development permit to develop a 106-unit multifamily project and
approval to rezone the property from M2, Limited Industrial, to MRM, Medium
Density Multifamily Residential. The property is located north of S . 262nd,
west of the Puget Power right of way, east of SR 167 and south of the Green
River.
Stephen Clifton, Planning Department, presented the staff report.
Mr. Clifton made some corrections to the staff report: 1) page 3 : under the
Valley Floor Plan should say Ordinance 2902, amending the Valley Floor Plan;
2) page 4 : above the Human Environment, it should say City-Wide
Comprehensive Plan; 3) page 5 : Valley Floor Plan, Goal 4, the last word
should read activities rather than uses and 4) page 10: under Significant
Social Features, Street System, second paragraph, " . . .this alternative
requires driving a one-vehicle wide" should read "two-vehicle wide" .
Mr. Clifton presented the rezone report first. The staff is recommending
denial . Mr. Clifton showed some view foils depicting 1) the location of the
size and 2) zoning of the property and surrounding properties. A video of
the site was shown.
Mr. Clifton commented the project was analyzed under the goals, objectives
and policies of the Valley Floor and City-Wide Comprehensive Plan as well as
the recently adopted City-wide Housing Study. Mr. Clifton stated the site
is approximately two-thirds of a mile south of the Kent Central Business
District and about two miles by car from the nearest major grocery and/or
convenience shopping area. Mr. Clifton stated access to shopping from this
4
KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STAFF REPORT
FOR HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF APRIL 18, 1990
FILE NO: WALNUT GROVE SUBDIVISION 4SU-90-2
APPLICANT: Rykels Engineering Group, Inc.
REQUEST: A request for preliminary subdivision approval
of 22 single-family residential lots.
STAFF
REPRESENTATIVE: Carol Proud, Planner
STAFF
RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS
I . GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Description of the Proposal
The applicant proposes to establish a 22-lot residential
subdivision on three parcels. The site is currently under
two separate ownerships. The proposed subdivision
boundaries will be established as a result of two lot line
adjustments filed with King County upon approval of the
preliminary subdivision . The subdivision will include
lots A and B of the Franks lot line adjustment and lot C
of the McGrew lot line adjustment.
Included in the proposal is approximately 21000 linear feet
of new surface streets with curbs, gutters, sidewalks,
street lighting and related utilities. The subject site
is divided by two separate zoning districts. The average
lot size on the property north of proposed S. 242nd Street
is 8 , 570 square feet and 10,779 square feet on the property
to the south. The resulting subdivision will provide for
22 detached single-family homes at a density of
approximately 3 . 6 units per acre.
B. Location
The site abuts the east side of 94th Avenue S. and the west
side of 96th Avenue S . , south of S. 241st Street.
1
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
C. Size of Property
The property is 6. 1 acres in size.
D. Zoning Designation
The site north of S . 242nd Street is within an R1-7 . 21
Single-family Residential, zoning district and an R1-9 . 6 ,
Single-family Residential, zoning district to the south.
All lots exceed the minimum lot size required in the
respective zoning district
II . LAND USE
Land use in the area is almost exclusively residential. The
site itself is currently undeveloped.
III, SITE AND AREA HISTORY
The southern half of the subject property was annexed into the
City in 1987 as part of the East Hill Well Annexation. The
current zoning of the property was established at that time.
It appears that some subdivision activity has occurred in the
area while still a part of King County.
The northern portion of the site was annexed into the City in
1977 and is part of the 4 . 8 acre Franks annexation. The current
zoning was established at that time. The property is also
portions of lots 3 and 4 of the Franks #2 Short Subdivision
(#SP-78-1) approved in 1978 .
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
A. Environmental Assessment
A final Mitigated Declaration of NonsigniiffOcance subjectNS)
(#ENV-89-110) was issued on January 12 ,
to
the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall provide a comprehensive, accurate
tree plan for all trees on-site of 6" caliper or
greater in conjunction with submission of the
preliminary plat application. Trees identified for
preservation by the Planning Department shall be
2
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
identified and protected during grading or
construction by means deemed appropriate by the
Planning Department.
2 . A thorough storm drainage analysis shall be done to
design on-site systems to provide adequate capacity
to collect and convey flows from upstream properties .
The storm analysis shall also address the adequacy of
downstream systems and determine necessary
improvements to provide conveyance capacity and
prevent erosion. The owner/developer shall construct
the needed improvements at the time of development.
3 . Provide on-site detention of storm water in accordance
with City standards. Biofiltration of storm water
shall be provided prior to discharge into off-site
City systems. Location of the biofiltration swale
shall be illustrated on the preliminary plat plan.
4 . The adjacent roadways shall be reconstructed and
improved to provide a half-street roadway section of
18 feet for 94th Avenue S . and 16 feet for
S. 241st Street and 96th Avenue S. The improvements
shall include asphalt pavement, curb and gutter,
sidewalks, drainage facilities, street lighting,
underground utilities and related appurtenances. Said
improvements shall also include reconstructing,
widening and overlaying the north half of 241st Street
and the westerly half of 94th Avenue S. to provide a
12-foot wide driving lane. Further, the easterly half
of 96th Avenue S. shall be reconstructed and/or
widened to 16 feet including the installation of curb
and gutter if determined necessary by the Public Works
Director. The off-site streets of 241st from 94th
Avenue to the plat and 94th Avenue from James Street
to the plat shall be widened and overlaid to 24 feet
with an 8 foot gravel shoulder on one side.
5 . The developer shall do a traffic study to identify
all traffic impacts upon the City of Kent road network
and traffic signal system. The study shall identify
all intersections at level-of-service "E" or "F" or
which will be at level of service "E" or "F" due to
increased traffic volumes from the development. These
intersections are at a threshold level for traffic
mitigation.
3
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-9o-2
The study shall then identify what improvements are
necessary to mitigate the development impacts thereon.
Upon agreement by the City with the findings of the
study and the mitigation measures outlined in the
study, implementation and/or construction of said
mitigation measures shall be the conditional
requirement of the issuance of the respective
development permits.
In lieu of conducting the above traffic study,
constructing and/or implementing the respective
mitigation measures hereby, the developer may agree
to the following conditions to mitigate the traffic
impacts resulting from the Walnut Grove Subdivision
development.
A. The developer shall execute an environmental
mitigation agreement to financially participate
and pay a fair share of the costs associated with
the construction of the South 272nd/277th Street
corridor project. The minimum benefit to the
above development is estimated at $23 ,496 based
on 23 PM peak hour trips entering and leaving the
site and the capacity of the South 272nd/277th
Street corridor.
The execution of this agreement will serve to
mitigate traffic impacts to the above mentioned
intersections and road system by committing
funding for the South 272nd/277th Street
corridor, which will provide additional capacity
for traffic volumes within the area of the above
mentioned development.
6 . The applicant shall leave one lot (preferably proposed
Lot 7) in open space as a neighborhood park. Prior
to the issuance, or in conjunction therewith, of a
final plat approval on this property, an agreement
shall be developed to the City's satisfaction and
executed for the continuous operation and maintenance
of this park. Addressed in said agreement shall be
the specifics associated with the property owner' s
responsibility to operate and maintain said park
including a mechanism for charging and collecting the
costs thereof from the affected properties. Also
included therein will be the City's right to oversee
said operation and maintenance to insure that it is
4
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
being accomplished appropriately as determined by the
City.
B. Significant Natural Features
Topography and Vegetation
The topography of the subdivision site is relatively level
with a moderate 5 percent west facing slope. The property
is mostly covered with native grasses and shrubs. A few
stands of deciduous trees and three fir trees are located
on the eastern portion of the site.
C. Significant Social Features
1. Street System
The lots will have access to several streets including
S. 241st Street and proposed S. 242nd Street via 94th
Avenue S. and 96th Avenue S. Ninety-fourth Avenue S.
is a residential collector and has a public right-
of-way width of 60 feet. The actual width of paving
is 24 feet. The street is not currently improved with
curbs or gutters.
Traffic mitigation conditions have already been
determined as part of the SEPA review process. S.
242nd Street will be improved to City standards for
residential streets including street lighting, curbs,
gutters and sidewalks. Ninety-sixth Avenue S. and S .
241st Street will be improved to city standards for
half street improvements for that portion of the
roadway abutting the subject property.
2 . Water System
An existing eight-inch water main located in
94th Avenue S . is available to serve the subject
property. There is also a six-inch water main located
along S. 241st Street and along 96th Avenue S .
available to serve the site.
Water service from the City of Kent will be provided
to all lots. Main size shall be sufficient to provide
required fire and domestic flows. Minimum main size
shall be six inches. All utility improvements are
subject to City of Kent standards.
5
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
3 . Sanitary Sewer System
There is an existing eight-inch sewer main in S. 241st
Street, adjacent to a portion of the subject property.
There is also an existing sewer manhole at the
intersection of S. 241st Street and 94th Avenue S .
available to serve future residential development.
4 . Storm Water System
Detailed plans of the storm drainage improvements will
be required as part of the plat approval.
5 . LID' s
No LIDS are pending for this proposal.
V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Kent first adopted a City-wide Comprehensive Land
Use Plan in 1969 . The goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan represent an expression of community
intentions and aspirations concerning the future of Kent and
the area within the Sphere of Interest. The Comprehensive Plan
is used by the Mayor, City Council, City Administrator, Planning
Commission, Hearing Examiner and City departments to guide
growth, development and spending decisions. Residents, land
developers, business representatives and others may refer to the
plan as a statement of the City' s intentions concerning future
development.
The City of Kent has also adopted a number of sub-area plans
that address specific concerns of certain areas of the City.
Like the City-wide Plan, the sub-area plans serve as policy
guides for future land use in the City of Kent. This area is
served by the East Hill sub-area plan. The following is a
review of these plans as they relate to the subject property.
CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City-wide Comprehensive Plan is made up of two entities,
the Comprehensive Plan Map and the written goals, objectives
and policies. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site
as SF, Single Family.
6
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
HOUSING ELEMENT
OVERALL GOAL: ASSURE A DECENT HOME AND SUITABLE LIVING
ENVIRONMENT FOR FAMILIES DESIRING TO LIVE IN
KENT.
GOAL 2 : Guide new residential development into areas where
the needed services and facilities are available, and
in a manner which is compatible with existing
residential neighborhoods.
Objective 2 : Permit new residential development on the
East and West Hills as the necessary
facilities and services are available.
Planning Department Comment:
This Comprehensive Plan goal and objective establishes the City
policy of encouraging development of new single-family housing.
A major distinction in types of housing units is that between
multifamily and single-family units. In recent years,
multifamily development has far outpaced single-family
construction.
If approved, this proposal will make available 22 single-family
residential lots . This will encourage the production of single-
family dwellings and help to restore a balance in the mix of
single-family and multifamily housing types.
Objective 3 : Guide new residential growth so that it
occurs in a responsible manner, consistent
with neighborhood objectives.
Planning Department Comment:
This objective supports the policy which encourages in-fill
development of areas already served by utilities and
transportation systems to achieve maximum efficiency in the
provision of services and preservation of natural features.
The subject site is an area where existing residential
development has already necessitated the extension of water and
sewer service and the construction of other public improvements
in the area. If approved, the Walnut Grove Subdivision would
provide for in-fill development in an area that is serviced by
the City Water and Sewer system.
7
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
GOAL 4 : Assure environmental quality in residential areas.
Objective 1: Preserve and maintain as much of the natural
environment as possible.
Policy 2 : Require site design to conserve natural
features, such as streams, steep slopes,
trees, and wetlands.
Planning Department Comment:
As a result of a SEPA condition, the applicant must submit a
tree plan that shows the location of existing trees on the site
in relation to the proposed lots. The trees located in proposed
street will necessarily have to be removed. The remaining trees
will be retained for the benefit of future development.
EAST HILL PLAN
As with the City-wide Comprehensive Plan, the East Hill has two
components: the East Hill Plan Map, which designates the site
as SF 6, Single Family with 4 to 6 units per acre, and the
Goals, Objectives and Policies.
HOUSING ELEMENT
OVERALL GOAL: ASSURE PRESENT AND FUTURE EAST HILL RESIDENTS
HOUSING THAT 'IS SAFE, OFFERS A DESIRABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT,
AND IS SUPPORTED BY ADEQUATE COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES .
GOAL 1: Residential development that is related to the
availability of community facilities and services.
Objective 1 : When making decisions concerning land use,
consider the adequacy of and impact upon
roads and other public facilities and
services including utilities, policy and
fire protection, public transportation,
schools and parks.
Policy 1: Ensure that public facilities and services
are available or will be available to
support development at proposed densities.
Policy 2 : Locate new single-family detached
residential development in areas and at
8
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
densities which permit roads, utilities,
public transit, schools and other public
facilities and services to be provided in
an efficient and cost-effective manner.
Planning Department Comment:
The proposed subdivision may eventually result in the
construction of 22 single-family dwellings. Assuming 2 .9
persons per household, an additional 64 persons would require
City services as a result of development of the plat.
Community facilities and services will be available to serve
these persons. To ensure adequate fire flows to the site, water
quantities and pressures in approved locations must meet Fire
Department standards. Fire hydrants will be placed at the
required 600 foot spacing. Street signage will be provided to
assist City personnel (including police, fire and medical aid
persons) to locate the development.
As a result of a SEPA condition, the applicant will dedicate
one of the original lots fronting 94th Avenue S. to the City as
a future neighborhood park site.
VI . FEASIBILITY OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
A. Zoning Code
All future development on the proposed lots are subject to
the development standards for the R1-7.2 and R1-9. 6, single
family, zoning districts, the solar access setback
regulations, and the tree preservation ordinance.
Planning Department Comment:
All lots have a building site capable of meeting zoning
setback requirements. Solar access setback regulations
will apply to all lots. The purpose of the solar access
setback provisions is to provide a reasonable amount of
solar access to lots in the City so that the economic value
of solar radiation falling on those properties will be
preserved and the option to use solar energy will be
encouraged. Any structures built on the lots in a
residential zone must maintain solar access to the adjacent
lots to the north. The applicant should note that because
of the varied slopes of the subject property, adequate
9
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
north/south dimensions may not be available on all of the
proposed lots to build structures taller than a single
story.
B. Subdivision Code
The purpose of the City of Kent Subdivision Code is to
provide rules, regulations, requirements, and standards
for subdividing land in the City of Kent, ensuring that
the highest feasible quality in subdivision will be
attained; that the public health, safety, general welfare,
and aesthetics of the City of Kent shall be promoted and
protected; that orderly growth, development, and the
conservation, protection and proper use of land shall be
ensured; that proper provisions for all public facilities
(including circulation, utilities, and services) shall be
taken into consideration; that conformance with provisions
set forth in the City of Kent Zoning Code and Kent
Comprehensive Plan shall be ensured.
Planning Department Comment:
The proposed plat is in general conformance with the
regulations of the Subdivision Code. Streets conform to
the circulation pattern established in the area and all
proposed sewers, water mains, and other utilities will
comply with applicable City requirements.
VII . MEETINGS CORRESPONDENCE, AND LEGAL NOTICES
A tentative plat meeting with the applicant and members of the
subdivision committee was held on November 5, 1989. All
appropriate comments and concerns have been included in this
report.
VIII. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
The following departments and agencies were advised of this
application:
City Administrator City Attorney
Director of Public Works Chief of Police
Parks & Recreation Director Fire Chief
Building Official City Clerk
10
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
In addition to the above, all persons owning property which lies
within 300 feet of the site were notified of the application and
of the April 18 , 1990 public hearing.
Staff comments have been incorporated in the staff report where
applicable.
IX. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW
The Planning Department has reviewed this application in
relation to the Comprehensive Plan, East Hill Plan, Subdivision
Code, Zoning Code, land use, the street system, and comments
from other departments and finds that:
A. The City-wide Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site
as SF, Single Family Residential .
B. The East Hill Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site
as SF, Single Family Residential.
C. The site is presently zoned R1-7.21 single-Family
Residential , with a 7 , 200 square feet minimum lot size and
R1-9 .6, Single-Family Residential with a 9, 600 square foot
minimum lot size.
D. All 22 lots meet or exceed the minimum lot size specified
in the development standards for the respective zoning
districts.
E. Land use in the area is predominantly single-family
residential .
F. The subdivision will have access to S. 241st Street,
proposed S . 242nd Street, 94th Avenue S. and 96th Avenue S .
X. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Upon review of the merits of this request and the Code criteria
for granting a preliminary plat, the City staff recommends
approval with the following conditions:
Planning Department Condition:
The applicant shall record with the King County
Department of Records the tentative lot line
11
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#Su-9o-2
adjustment for the Franks property and the McGrew
property prior to the issuance of any development
permits on the site including the grade and fill
permit for any road improvements.
Public Works Department Conditions:
A. Prior to Recordation of Plat:
1. Comply with all applicable SEPA conditions.
2 . Obtain City approval of detailed engineering drawings
for the following and either bond or construct same:
a. Provide gravity sanitary sewer service to all
lots. Main line sewer extensions shall be made
from 94th Avenue S. and S. 241st Street southerly
to S . 242nd Street and then easterly along S .
242nd Street to 96th Avenue S. Also extend
sanitary sewers to southeast corner of the
subject property to allow a future extension
easterly along S. 243rd Street.
b. Extend City water to provide adequate domestic
and fire flows to service all lots. Minimum six-
inch water mains are required. Loop system from
S. 241st Street and 96th Avenue S. to connect
with water main at 94th Avenue S. and S. 242nd
Street. Also extend water main to southeast
corner of the subject property to allow future
connection with the water main on S. . 242nd
Street and 96th Avenue S. (extended) .
C. All interior streets and cul-de-sacs (i .e.
proposed S. 242nd Street shall be fully improved
with asphalt pavement (32 feet in width for
S . 242nd Street, and 28 feet in width for the
cul-de-sac) , curb and gutter, sidewalks, drainage
system, street lighting, underground utilities
and related appurtenances. Minimum curb return
radii shall be 45 feet for cul-de-sacs and 25
feet at other street intersections. Provide
street name signs for all streets shown on the
plat map.
3 . Dedicate all necessary property for the construction
of roadway improvements required as SEPA conditions
12
Staff Report
Walnut Grove Subdivision
#SU-90-2
and plat conditions noted above. Grant all necessary
on-site and off-site easements for the construction,
and maintenance of the utility improvements required
under SEPA and as noted above.
B. Prior to Or in Conjunction With the Issuance of a
Development Permit on any Lot
Construct all on-site and off-site improvements required
as SEPA conditions and plat conditions.
KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 9, 1990
13
City of Kent - Planning Department
7clt\
1 I\ r
\ 1
I /
���:•����.::: '::;:::c;::r:•�:=:��:� :?::�;:r : \ � Ili
Y � 11 f / 1 :•.'�': �."�::�:�'': �'�'':���F� =:'::::�: 1 1 1 1 1 ! � \
rr
1
APPLICATION NAME: Walnut Grove
NUMBER: SU-90-2 DATE: April 18, 1990
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat
LEGEND
Application site
ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP Zoning boundary
�'�' City limits '�
City of Kent - Planning Department
wil
N m S 232ND
cc
w
>
x
0
0
w
o j N
Q
o w
J w x 237TH PL ¢
¢ ¢ w 0
¢ z
o N
]LufS
0 sT
S 241ST ST
¢ w
CE
> {}
242ND
¢
D .....: :243RO ST
a[:TM ST u
N
x
9� m
�DEAN $T
MRCL7N ST SE 248TH ST,9O �6 =�
GUIBERSON ST
APPLICATION NAME: Walnut Grove
NUMBER: SU-90-2 DATE: April 18, 1990
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat
LEGEND
'z Application site
VICINITY MAP Zoning boundary
.. City limits ''!
City of Kent - Planning Department
—ter—
I ��-- S 241 . 5 T
ijk
70 —7b— a TOt— k 10,161SF ( I
M W{
17225 SF 8960 SF 8960 m 0
O ? $ 14( O?
13 °J 12 m 11 m 1 n
.- ry lV ry
�4S
I CO MUNITY ' 73 / ' 44 Pad
II,I 7890RSF 7 10,69q SF I {5
h I 77 70 43 11. 41 'J� ry 00�
CCC m I Gy
7570 �PF_ 7220 SF 7 20 S r 9801SFn ^ 7250 8700 S2 \73
4 O S .
9t F I
� I5 - 6 0 7 �-83\F e\
I 5 70 36
78
72.5 0 65
jl P OPOSED S 242ND STR ET40
.R
36
Nest 3 2 so 71 .n
M '
-9690 SF „ I as 9750 SF 9800 SF
r 15 21 22� m
e. `n
M � \
f — — -- — — 77 722 61 �.h° 0 3 70
10,065 F 10,76qq S
16 Jo 30 5° ZO
i SD E T J1
I I I
18 19
13,9`60 SF 652 SF 12'220SF
. d 125\ 28
tl —1
P�
of
15' SD EASEMENT FOR 810FILTRATION DITCH
APPLICATION NAME: Walnut Grove
NUMBER: SU-90-2 DATE: April 18, 1990
REQUEST: Preliminary Plat
LEGEND
Application site
SITE PLAN Zoning boundary
City limits
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, relating to the crime of lewd
conduct, further defining the crime of lewd
conduct, amending Kent City Code 9.02.34.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Kent City Code 9.02.34 amended as follows:
9.02.34 LEWD CONDUCT
A. A person is guilty of lewd conduct if the person
intentionally performs any lewd act in a public place, or at a
place and under circumstances where such act could be observed by
any member of the public, knowing that such conduct is likely to
i
cause reasonable affront or alarm.
B. For purposes of this Section 9.02.34, or as
otherwise referenced, the following definitions shall apply:
1. "Lewd act" means:
a. An exposure of one's genitals or female
breasts; or
b. The touching, caressing or fondling of the
genitals or female breasts; or
C. Sexual intercourse. For purposes of this
section, sexual intercourse has its ordinary meaning, and occurs
upon any penetration, however slight; it also means any act of
sexual conduct between persons involving the sex organs of one
person and the mouth or anus of another.
d. Masturbation.
2. "Public place" is an area generally visible to i
public view and includes streets, sidewalks, bridges, alleys,
plazas, parks, driveways, parking lots, motor vehicles (whether
i
I�
i
moving or not) , and buildings open to the general public,
including those which serve food or drink or provide
entertainment, and the doorways and entrances to buildings or
dwellings and the grounds enclosing them.
C. This Section 9.02.34 shall not be applied to
artistic or dramatic performances in a theater or a museum.
D. Any person who commits an act of lewd conduct shall
be guilty of a misdemeanor pursuant to KCC 9.02.108.
Section 2. Any act consistent with the authority and
prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified
and confirmed.
I
i
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take I
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final)
passage as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK ,
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY `
I
2
I
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5, 1990
Category Other Business
v 1. SUBJECT: VISION 20-20 - PUGET SOUND COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
!! 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Puget Sound Council of Governments
(PSCOG) is requesting a City Council recommendation of a
preferred vision for growth in transportation in the central
Puget Sound region. In April 1990, the PSCOG issued a draft
environmental impact statement evaluating five different growth
and transportation alternatives: no action, existing plans,
major centers, multiple centers, and disperse growth. On
May 15, 1990, the Council Planning Committee reviewed the five
alternatives and endorsed the multiple centers option. In
October 1990, the PSCOG assembly will select a preferred Vision
20-20 which will guide future regional investments in roads and
infrastructure. I
3 . EXHIBITS: Staff emo, Vision 20-20 Supplement, Planning
Committee minutes
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Ci y Council Planning Committee 5 15 90
(Committee, Staf , Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL RSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL PERSONNEL NO E: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRE $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember (r ' ,� moves, Councilmember >> ' seconds
To adoptA466**utV)0W6#44ft the City Council Planning Committee',
recommendation of the PSCOG multiple centers vision for grow h
in transportation in the central Puget Sound region.
4�
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4B
KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May 31, 1990
TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: VISION 2020 - GROWTH STRATEGY AND TRANSPORTATION PLAN FOR
THE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGION
The Puget Sound Council of Governments (PSCOG) is developing a
regional growth strategy and transportation plan for the Central
Puget Sound region. It is called VISION 2020 . Five alternative
scenarios have been identified by PSCOG in a draft EIS prepared for
the VISION 2020 process. These alternatives are:
1 . No Action - No regional growth strategy is developed
under this alternative; each city determines its own
growth strategy.
2 . -' Existing Plans Alternative - Like #1, this alternative
contemplates no regional growth strategy; each City plans
according to its own land use/transportation plan.
3 . Major Centers Alternative - Urban growth is contained in
a few large downtown areas that can be served efficiently
by high-capacity transit.
4 . Multiple Centers Alternative - Similar to #3 above, but
growth is contained in designated large and small centers
that can be served effectively by transit.
5 . Dispersed Growth Alternative - Consists of a low-
density, sprawling alternative to growth management where
emphasis is on road development.
These five alternative growth/transportation strategies are
evaluated in the draft EIS prepared on the VISION 2020 plan
process. The PSCOG has requested that each member jurisdiction
review the alternatives and make recommendations to the COG by the
end of June. The general assembly of the PSCOG will vote on the
VISION 2020 plan in October 1990. Once adopted, VISION 2020 will
guide regional investment decisions in transportation well into the
future.
On May 15, 1990, the Council ' s Planning Committee reviewed the five
growth strategy and transportation plan alternatives. The
Committee voted to endorse the Multiple Centers alternative. The
committee had two primary reasons for this endorsement: 1) This
alternative was consistent with the recognized activity centers of
the King County comprehensive plan, and 2) the transportation
element provided for Kent' s cross-valley corridors.
FS :JPH: ca
PU ET SOUNd COUNCIL Of GOVERNMENTS
Grand Central on the Park 216 First Avenue South Seattle, WA 98104 (206) 464.7090
a y,
Highlights
VISION 2020
Growth Strategy and Transportation Plan
for the Central Puget Sound Region
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
April 1990
HIGHLIGHT'S OF THE DRAFT ACT STATMEN_T_
proposed Action: Adoption of a growth strategy and
transportation plan for the central Puget Sound region,
covering the period to the year 2020.
,Schedule: Selection of a preferred strategy and plan
(Vision) by July, and refinement of this preferred Vision
for Assembly adoption in October 1990 .
April May-June Juty Aug-Sept Oct Nov
Issue Offidal Preparation of Final EIS Issue Issue
EIS Draft DE IS (Additional Public Cammeras, Final Final
Process EIS Review Mdpalim Measures, EIS Report
Period unresolved issues)
Select Evaluation SelectionCe PSCOG
PSCOG Evaluation of ofAssembly PublishCommlitees Criteria, 0 PreferredAdoptsVISIONCouncils Identity VisionsVision Vision 2020
Keylssues
Review Recom-
Member Discuss and mend Vote
Jurisdictions Key Reoom- Refine- on
Issues mend ments Vision
Vision(s) to Visions
Review Review
General and and Final
Pubic Respond Respond Vision
to to
Visions Vision
Key Dates:
• Release of Draft EIS -- April 27, 1990
■ Publication of Tabloid in newspaper -- May 5 and 6, 1990
■ Public hearings ( 5) in each county and regional --
June and July
■ SRC actions to recommend preferred Vision -- July
■ SCOT action to recommend preferred Vision -- August 3
• Final SRC action on refined Vision -- October
• Executive Board approval of Vision -- October 27
■ Assembly action to approve Vision -- October 27
1
OVERVIEW OF THE FIVE ALTERNATIVE GROWTH STRATEGIES
No Action
There is no regional growth strategy. Each city and county sets its own
growth strategy. No additional investments in transportation facilities or
services are made beyond those already funded.
Existing Plans
There is no regional growth strategy, but cities and counties coordinate
their individual growth strategies, seeking consistency between local
plans and the regional plan. Transportation system investments
balance transit and roads including: 100 miles of light rail, 185 miles of
new HOV lanes, 100 miles of freeway widened, 20 miles of new freeway,
250 miles of arterials widened, and 10 miles of new arterials. Programs
to encourage transit and ridesharing are enhanced from current levels.
Major Centers
Regional strategy to contain growth in designated areas. Protect natural
areas. Employment growth concentrated in six major downtowns that
can be efficiently served by transit. Transportation investments
emphasize transit including: 140 miles of light rail, commuter rail, 300
miles of new HOV lanes, 50 miles of freeway widened, 10 miles of new
freeway, and 150 miles of arterials widened. Ambitious programs used
to encourage major increase in transit use and ridesharing.
Multiple Centers
Regional strategy to contain growth in designated areas. Protect natural
areas. Employment growth concentrated in 36 centers that can be
efficiently served by transit. Balance sought between job and housing
location to shorten commutes. Transportation investments emphasize
transit including: 120 miles of light rail, commuter rail, 250 miles of new
HOV lanes, 100 miles of freeway widened, 20 miles of new freeway, and
225 miles of arterials widened, 10 miles of new arterials. Ambitious
programs implemented to encourage major increase in transit use and
ridesharing.
Dispersed Growth
Regional strategy to reduce growth in congested areas through
development caps. Disperse growth to suburban and rural areas.
Protect important environmental resources. Transportation investments
emphasize roads including: 150 miles of freeway widened, 25 miles of
new freeway, 400 miles of arterials widened, 60 miles of new arterials,
130 miles of new HOV lanes, improved bus service. Programs
implemented to encourage ridesharing and off-peak commuting.
2
Population and Economic Growth
■ 1 . 4 million new people by 2020, +52%. As a comparison--
1 .2 million new people in past 30 years, +80% (see
below) .
■ Overall level of growth is the same: None of
Alternatives affect the rate of growth.
■ Location of growth in region varies among Alternatives.
■ Focus of VISION 2020 is to manage the new growth, not
affect its rate of increase.
Puget Sound Region
No Regional Population
1960 - 2020
Pop. soo
(000)
AW
t•oo
»oo
M•o
f•o
•
t•w wn 1980 ,wo t•oo solo t•m
3
r
Mobility
• Overall levels of congestion will continue to increase
as they did over the past 30 years.
• All "Build" Alternatives reduce delays by 1/2 compared
to No Action (5 times as bad vs . 10 times -- see"a"
below. )
■ Average speeds on roads for autos will be significantly
slower than speeds for transit and ridesharing ( see"b"
below. )
• Congestion levels vary within the region among
Alternatives .
• Transit ridership is 4 times that of today under major
centers and 3 times for Multiple and Existing Plans (see
"c" on next page . )
■ No Action and Dispersed decline in rate of transit use .
■ Demand management could significantly reduce travel,
particularly for Major Centers.
A
VEHICLE HOURS OF DELAY
P.M. Peak 3 Hours
2.6
2020
2
o
a
L
O
O
t
4-
0 1
V1
C
O
r
0.5
1990 2000 MUIC DG E MC NB
4
B
AVERAGE SPEED - HOV AVERAGE SPEED - GENERAL TRAFFIC
P.M. Peak 3 Hours (MPH) PAL Peak 3 Houn (MPH)
to
M
2020 2020
M t°
is
Is.
1s 10
w
°
s
o °
1N0 tD00 Yu1C E YC DD NB NO 2000 be "Wic E bic M
TRANSIT RIDERSHIP
OA1LV Al
(THOUSANDS)
1200
1100
1000 ---- —. -- --
800 -- 710 - -- -
665
600 -
400 - - - �
300
250
200
0
1990 NO EXISTING MAJOR MULTIPLE DISPERSED
ACTION PLANS CENTERS CENTERS GROWTH
2020
5
Housing Supply and Cost
■ Overall growth largely determines cost increases--will
increase under all Alternatives
• Localized increases result under Centers and Dispersed
because of growth management methods.
• Balance and price range requirements could partially
Offset localized increases under Multiple Centers.
• Regional affordable housing program can be applied under
all Alternatives .
Land Use and Neighborhood Character
■ All Alternatives have increases in residential densities
and significantly more multifamily than
today--distributed differently.
• Strong growth controls required under Centers must
include active neighborhood protection.
• Dispersed requires changes to "cap" growth in some urban
areas and encourage dispersal to rural areas.
[ Significantly smaller urban area under Centers--only 1/2
as much new land needed.
Open Space
• Development during the next 30 years will consume
significant amounts of open space for all alternatives .
■ Dispersed Growth will require over 1000 square miles of
new land, occupying over 3 times the land space of
today.
IS The Centers Alternatives require about 400 square miles
of new land, still nearly twice that of today, but 600
square miles less than Dispersed and 350 less than
Existing or No Action.
■ Need special mitigation in higher density areas to
protect remaining critical open space areas.
OPEN SPACE CONSUMED BY DEVELOPMENT
PUGET SOUND URBAN d URBANIZING AREA
touua
rnu
2600
2000
61J 60t
1600 767 t07
11e7
1000
600
0
1et0 NO [IItTINO YAJ011 YULT NL[ DISPERSED
ACTION PLANS CENTERS C[NTEPA GROWTH
E020
DEVELOPED- =VACANT DEVELOPABLE
•Includes de»loped perks.
6
p ,ht � c service Costs
■ Total public investment for all services is about the
same among Alternatives (except No Action) .
■ Transportation investment emphasis would vary, calling
for significant shifts in resource allocation for some
Alternatives ( see below. )
■ Public service cost efficiencies from compact
development (as in Centers alternatives) is translated
into more services-- Centers achieve more services than
other alternatives for same overall cost.
TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT EMPHASIS
Build Alternatives
100%
Transit �%
54% 67% 63%
50%
11
Existing Major Multiple Dispersed
Plans Centers Centers Growth
O Transit,HOv and TDM investments
-Highway capacity and maintenance investments
wat-or Resources
■ Demand expected to approach capacity before 2020.
• Additional major sources of water will have to be
developed.
• No significant overall differences in consumption among
Alternatives .
■ Localized differences in consumption and need for
coordination of supply.
7
Enercv
• Overall growth in energy consumption will overshadow
differences among Alternatives .
• Centers will result in small but significant energy
savings due to reduced vehicle use, more common wall
construction and less energy to construct transportation
system.
■ Should strengthen fuel economy requirements for vehicles
and energy efficiencies for structures.
DAILY FUEL CONSUMPTION IN 2020
FOR EACH DRAFT EIS ALTERNATIVE
MILLIONS OF GALLONS
10
8.3 8.1 g
s.a
8 7.8
I
61
I
4.6
4
2
0
1990 NO EXISTING MAJOR MULTIPLE DISPERSED
ACTION PLANS CENTERS CENTERS GROWTH
2020
Historic and Archaelocrical
■ Alternatives that concentrate growth in older areas
place greatest pressure on urban resources.
■ Dispersed Alternatives place greatest pressure on rural
resources .
• Site-by-site mitigation can reduce impacts for all
Alternatives .
8
Ayr Quality
■ No Action is worse than other alternatives for key
mobile pollutants ( see below. )
■ Pollution levels are somewhat higher, overall, in
region.
• Improvements in federal requirements will keep mobile
emmissions from increasing as fast vehicle travel.
Nitrogen oxides actually decrease over today' s level .
■ Alternatives vary by area but not appreciably at the
regional level .
■ Best approach to mitigation is tighter federal
standards. Some of increased air pollution will be
unmitigated.
AIR QUALITY
CARBON MONOXIDE
" YILl10YA D�
EAAYL/w.
1400 1262
1200 — war —
1060 /022 —1060
1000 $97
Boo
600
AIR QUALITY
REACTIVE HYDROCARBONS (OZONE) 400
MILLIONS OF
•AAYG/w. 4DD
200.0 165.5
182.E 161.0 I 0 1K0 NO EXISTING MAJOR MULTIPLE DISPERSED
154.9
152.3 IACTION PLANS CENTERS CENTER$ SROWTN
150.0 133.3 E020
100.0
I
60.0
AIR QUALITY
OXIDES OF NITROGEN
0.0
MSO M EXISTING MAJOR MULTIPLE DISPERSED rnuoYSor
1 ACT 100N PLANS_ CENTERS CENTERS GROWTH I •AAr4ro.
2020 120.0 - tf6.7 TIE.1 _ __ - �-
�'6 1106.9 106.E
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
WHIO ACTION EXISTING LANS CENTERS CENT MAJOR ERS D No ERS GROWTHPD
I
2020
9
Wetlands. -
0 These resources will be adversely affected by all
Alternatives due to large increment of new growth.
■ Centers have greatest potential impact in now-urbanized
areas.
■ Other Alternatives have greater impact on now-rural
areas.
■ Public purchase, land trusts, site development
requirements can help mitigate under all Alternatives.
Water Quality
■ All Alternatives will result in increased impacts on
water quality.
■ Centers Alternatives will focus impacts in urbanized
areas and spare more of rural areas.
■ Other Alternatives, especially Dispersed, will more
heavily affect rural areas .
• Many impacts can be mitigated via runoff retention and
treatment, sewers, wetlands protection and better
construction standards .
Noise
■ Noise levels will increase under all Alternatives
because of growth.
• Centers Alternatives are expected to expose more people
to higher noise levels.
• Noise spread over larger geographic area in Dispersed
Alternative .
• Site-by-site mitigation, but most new noise unmitigated.
Disasters and Hazards
• Valley stream flooding will increase due to
urbanization, greatest under Dispersed.
■ Mitigation via development standards .
■ Should consider potential earthquake implication in
siting new growth.
10
SUMNA] R.E' PORT' SNOBOMISH COUNTY
ALLOCATIONS
Emoloymen t:
Total Employment
Snohomish County
Tlwoon0.
Jeo
J60 -
Joo _......__.__. .. ._
,60
100
60
0
aao NO Aolbn E.)Un. WjCtrt. Nwcam. DioD.or.
sh county' s share of region' s employment:
■ 11% in the 1990 base year;
■ 12% under No Action;
■ 13% under Existing Plans, Major Centers and Dispersed
Growth;
■ 15% under Multiple Centers .
Households:
Total Households
Snohomish County
nw..ne.
400
J6000
260
r
900
160
.. .._ ..
100 -
0
9J0 No Acton E:1mo I44Ctn YJtQn. DMO.Or.
mummnly M Ji1ir f. i+y
Snohomish Countv' s share of the region' s households:_
■ 15% in the 1990 base year;
■ 18% under No Action;
• 19% under Existing Plans, Major Centers, Multiple
Centers and Dispersed Growth.
11
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
New transportation investments in Snohomish County include:
■ Major Freeways - new lanes on I-5 and I-405 under
Existing Plans, Multiple Centers, and Dispersed Growth
■ Major Transit Investments - regional rail system on I-5
under Existing Plans, on both I-5 and I-405 under Major
Centers and Multiple Centers
■ Ferries - new passenger-only ferry service from Everett
to Whidbey Island and to Edmonds/Seattle, and from
Edmonds to Kingston under Major Centers and Multiple
Centers
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
Vehicle Delay and Vehicle Miles Traveled
HOURS OF DELAY/SNOHOMISH COUNTY VMT/SNOHO IPSEH COUNTY
PM PEAK PERIOD PM PEAK
Tl,o� Mtllonl
■oo, T
■oo' eI,
4
cool 3
zoo i
i
o °
1i90 NO ACTIONEX PlAMB WJ.CEII MILT.CFIL DIV.OR. 000 MO AC[ION EX.PLAW MAJ.CEK WLT.CEK DIM.00.
Transit and Carpool Use
TRANSIT & CARPOOL
% WORK TRIPS/Snohomish County
,z —
,o
E-
e
♦I
I
];
0
799° Mo U,ion EJYm Wi°,n. MJiQ n. dop.tr.
12
SUMMARY REPORT: KING COUNTY
ALLOCATIONS
Employment:
Total Employment
King County
TIaM�
12001400
,000
.._ _.. _
.._.._._._.._.._ .... ._ _ ,
.oc
a00 -
400
200
0
OW No Meton E:)luw M.;.ctn. YW,Ctn. a.o.a.
King County' s share of region' s emi)loyment:
■ 67% in the 1990 base year;
■ 66% under No Action and Existing Plans;
■ 67% under Major Centers;
■ 63% under Multiple Centers; and
■ 60% under Dispersed Growth.
Households:
Total Households
King County
Tbw"na.
o00
.oa
Soo
400
200
i
0
woo No Iatbn Esll� Yy.Cen. MWCCtn. 0Mp.Or.
=►whifu fy ®aingw fwiy
King County' s share of the region' s households:
■ 57% in the 1990 base year;
■ 53% under No Action, Existing Plans and Multiple
Centers;
• 54% under Major Centers; and
• 50% under Dispersed Growth.
13
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
New transportation investments in King County include:
■ Major Freeways - new lanes on I-5 (south of Seattle) ,
I-405, and Highway 167 under Existing Plans, Multiple
Centers, Dispersed Growth; two new arterial ring roads
east of Lake Sammamish under Dispersed Growth
■ Major transit investments - regional rail system under
Existing Plans, Major Centers, and Multiple Centers;
commuter rail to Tacoma and Olympia under Major Centers
■ Ferries - new passenger-only ferry service to Tacoma,
Vashon, Kitsap County, Lynnwood, Everett under Major
Centers and Multiple Centers; new auto ferry service to
Bremerton, Vashon, Southworth under Dispersed Growth
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
Vehicle Delay and Vehicle Miles Traveled
HOURS OF DELAY/KING COUNTY VMT FOR KING COUNTY
PM PEAK PERIOD PM PEAK PERIOD
rnOw.tef fiu0�.
t000� I 1'
i
is
SOD
i to
eoo �1 •
soo
•
xo 2
O 0
1sf0 110 ACTIDr1 fzxAN► NAALTM. wT.eTwf. wsr.fn WOO NO ACnONEX PLANS •A.L CEN YUU CEN OW.M
Transit and Carpool Use
TRANSIT & CARPOOL
% WORK TRIPS/King County
a0�
if
20�
1f
1
10 i
f i
1
0
aw No Aat SxPY Mahn. MJLOn. DIf0.4•.
14
SUMMARY REPORT: x7TSAP COUNTY
ALLOCATIONS
Employment:
Total Employment
Kitsap County
Tl�owuda _�
140 1
120
100 .... -
i0 --
00
40 I
20
0
yip No btlon EaPlana Yaj.Cva. MWCCYn. f>;ap.Or.
j a ounty' s share of reaion' s employment:
• 5% in the 1990 base year;
■ 5% under No Action, Existing Plans, Major Centers and
Multiple Centers;
■ 6% under Dispersed Growth.
Households:
Total Households
Kitsap County
Tleuaanda
160120
100
&0so
40
10
yio No ACUon EirinO fialCtr� Yi/lCtn. Dip.Or.
YulUfamay ®SmgW family
Kitsap county' s share of the region' s households :
■ 7% in the 1990 base year;
• 8% under No Action and Dispersed Growth;
■ 7% under Existing Plans and Multiple Centers;
■ 6% under Major Centers .
15
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
New transportation investments in Kitsap County include:
■ New Bridges - new bridges across Port Washington Narrows
and Agate Passage under Dispersed Growth
■ Ferries - new passenger-only ferry service to Seattle
under Existing Plans; new passenger-only ferry service
to Seattle, Edmonds and Tacoma with additional terminals
in Suguamish and Silverdale under Major Centers and
Multiple Centers; additional auto ferry service on
Bremerton and Southworth ferry runs under Dispersed
Growth
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
Vehicle Delay and Vehicle Miles Traveled
HOURS OF DELAY/KITSAP COUNTY VMT/KITSAP COUNTY
PM PEAK PERIOD PM PEAK PERIOD
Thou� TNow[�e.
�o I s000
E6
•0 1600.
i
26I
20 1000
i
16
1
600
0.
0
0 *W NC ACr*NEX PW16 MAI CEN YUIT.CEN DIMS � nD��" [i r� �t C[K Wt1.QK WV.M.
Transit and Carpool Use
TRANSIT & CARPOOL
% WORK TRIPS/Kitsap County
6
1R0 Mo Klan Etl'1n YuOv�. YJLGri ONpO.
16
SUMMARY REPORT: PIERCE COUNTY
ALLOCATIONS
Eployraent:
Total Employment
Pierce County
TNweuds
600 i
soo - -
Soo
100
too
0
1990 No Action Elllent MeiCtr& MLftOkm. Diso.Or.
Pierce County' s share of region' s employment:
■ 17% in the 1990 base year;
■ 17% under Multiple Centers;
■ 16% under No Action, Existing Plans and Major Centers;
■ 20% under Dispersed Growth.
Households:
Total Households
Pierce County
TNoueends
Goo.
400,
/
400
SOD
i I
100 _..._. .._ _.. ... ...
I
O
1G90 No Aollen E:.Mrte IMjC" Yultpn. DIep.Or.
YuNlfenly ®SNtpb hnllr
Pierce County' s share of the region' s households:
• 20% in the 1990 base year;
• 20% under Multiple Centers;
■ 21% under No Action, Existing Plans and Major Centers;
■ 22% under Dispersed Growth.
17
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
New transportation investments in Pierce County include:
■ Major Freeways - new lanes on I-5 and new Highway 167
under Existing Plans, Multiple Centers, Dispersed Growth
■ Major Transit Investments - on regional rail system
under Existing Plans, Major Centers, and Multiple
Centers; commuter rail to Seattle/Olympia under Major
Centers
■ Ferries - new passenger-only ferry service to Tacoma
from Seattle under Major Centers and Multiple Centers
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
Vehicle Delay and Vehicle Miles Traveled
HOURS OF DELAY/PIERCE COUNTY VMT/PIERCE COUNTY
PM PEAK PERIOD PM PEAK PERIOD
soo I soon
too soon
too
soon
iso
00o
ioo ;
so
+000
i
PYO NO ACTIONE)C PLAMY WJ.CEK WLT.CEK DI■P.fYI.
O #A"MK WLT.CM DWAK
Transit and Carpool Use
TRANSIT & CARPOOL
% WORK TRIPS/Pierce County
10.
air
2
0Koh
18
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF MEETING OF MAY 15, 1990
after the comprehensive study was completed. The study is done and the
interim ordinance was never repealed. Councilwoman Houser MOVED and
Councilwoman Orr SECONDED the motion to recommend repeal of Ordinance #2788 .
Motion carried.
VISION 2020 - PSCOG/STATE LAND USE LAW
Grace Byrne, PSCOG Principal Planner and one of two project managers for
Vision 2020, distributed supplements on the project. She gave a brief
history of PSCOG. PSCOG was formed in 1957 as a voluntary association of
counties and cities in King, Snohomish, Pierce and Kitsap counties. It was
formed to address regional issues that cross jurisdictional boundaries. In
the 1960 ' s the federal government established metropolitan planning
organizations and mandated those organizations to do transportation planning
on a regional basis. All federal funds for capital improvements for
transportation would need to be approved by the metropolitan planning
organization and be based on a transportation plan. PSCOG was designated a
metropolitan planning organization for transportation planning.
The Vision 2020 project started about three years ago as two separate
projects: regional development strategy and regional transportation
planning. Under the regional development strategy PSCOG was told to address
growth, including such issues as sewers, parks and affordable housing. Every
county identified a relationship between regional transportation and land
use. It was also decided to update the regional transportation plan which
goes only to the year 2000 , although there is a rail plan that goes to 2020.
There needed to be an entire transportation plan which extended to the year
2020. The two projects were combined into one named Vision 2020.
In Vision 2020 five alternatives are identified. A draft EIS has been done
and PSCOG is requesting comments on the EIS through the end of June. PSCOG
is looking for the subregional council in each of the counties to make a
preferred recommendation. The PSCOG executive board will take action on the
preferred recommendation, technical information will be developed and a final
decision will be made in October of 1990. Every elected official of every
member jurisdiction will have a vote in the PSCOG Assembly in October. The
vote will be based on the population of the jurisdiction.
Planning Manager Satterstrom noted that Chairman Johnson is Kent ' s PSCOG
representative. Ms. Byrne showed a video on Vision 2020 . Vision 2020 is a
growth management and transportation plan for the region. The five
alternatives identified in Vision 2020 are 1) No Action, 2) Existing Plans,
3 ) Major Centers, 4) Multiple Centers, and 5) Dispersed Growth. The
alternatives differ in their emphasis on such areas as types of
transportation system investments, where new employment and housing locate,
estimated land development scenarios, and who controls growth strategy. Ms.
Byrne responded to Anne Biteman that PSCOG is funded by dues from cities and
counties (based on population) , the federal government, and the State
3
CITY COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE
MINUTES OF MEETING OF MAY 15, 1990
Department of Transportation.
Mr. Satterstrom stated that staff is recommending City Council endorsement
of the Multiple Centers alternative. That alternative appears to recognize
the existing hierarchy of centers that are recognized by the King County
Comprehensive Plan and transportation element. While promoting cross-valley
corridors, it also highlights a commuter rail system in the valley. It seems
to be more reflective of existing growth patterns. Councilwoman Orr MOVED
and Councilwoman Houser SECONDED the motion to recommend the Multiple Centers
alternative to be placed on the June 5th City Council agenda under Other
Business. Motion carried. The City Council may elect to have a full staff
presentation on this project.
Ms. Byrne stated that Kent City Council members would be notified of the
PSCOG Assembly meeting which is to be held at the end of October. She
believes the PSCOG by-laws require 60-day advance notice of the meeting.
HUMAN SERVICES ROUNDTABLE 1990-1991 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
This was added to the agenda. Senior Planner Lin Ball distributed copies of
the proposed agenda. Present issues on the legislative agenda were developed
around the Roundtable ' s action agenda of five priority areas: 1) Family
support, 2) housing, 3) child care, 4) job training, and 5) health care. The
agenda has been incorporated into the Suburban Cities agenda and it is
anticipated it will be incorporated into the AWC agenda as well in order to
present a unified front. Each priority area has specific action issues rated
in tier levels. The Roundtable is seeking local City Council support and
endorsement of the legislative agenda. Councilwoman Orr MOVED and
Councilwoman Houser SECONDED the motion to recommend to the City Council
endorsement of the Human Services Roundtable legislative agenda, which issue
will be placed on the City Council Consent Calendar of June 5. Motion
carried.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 5 : 10 PM.
4
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5, 1990
Category Bids
r
1. SUBJECT: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE VEHICLE
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Two bids were received on May 8..wft--fhe
bid received from Hackney & Sons, Inc. at $56,934 plus tax and
delivery charge of $2, 500 is within budget and was the low bid
submitted. The v�cle meets all specifications cx , cLJ-f - -- '
r
3 . EXHIBITS: Hazardous Materials Vehicle greement
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Chief Angelo, Assiitant Chief Berg
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Co ission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERSONNEL ACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Reco ended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $5 434 plus 8 . 1 percent sales tax
SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1990 C tal Improvement Budget
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:V1
Councilmember 1 r� - moves, Councilmember 41�1�'t---second
T,ha- en to award bid for the Hazardous Materials Response
Vehicle to Hackney & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $59,434 plus i
tax and to authorize the Mayor to sign the contract. �y
DISCUSSION•_
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5A
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS VEHICLE AGREEMENT
In consideration of the following terms and conditions,
including payment of fifty six thousand nine hundred thirty four
dollars ($56,934 . 00) plus delivery charge of two thousand five
hundred dollars ($2 , 500. 00) plus applicable taxes to be paid by the
City of Kent, the City of Kent and Hackney and Sons, Inc.
(hereafter Hackney) of 400 Hackney Avenue, Washington, North
Carolina 27889-0880 agree as follows:
1. Contract documents. This agreement incorporates as
contract terms and conditions all bid documents, quotations,
specifications, correspondence, beverage bodies, standard terms,
conditions of sale, bid documents, and Hackney equipment brochures
submitted on behalf of Hackney to the City on or about May 10,
1990. In the event of conflict between the terms and conditions
of this agreement and the earlier documents, this agreement shall
prevail .
2 . Jurisdiction. This agreement shall be governed by
construed according to the laws of the State of Washington. In the
event of any controversy between Hackney and the City arising out
of this agreement, parties consent to the venue and jurisdiction
of the King County Superior Court for the State of Washington.
Each party shall pay their own attorney fees.
3 . Warranties. Warranties in this document are in addition
to any statutory remedies or warranties imposed by law upon the
Contractor. If any component, unit, or subsystem is repaired,
rebuilt or replaced by Hackney, such warranty work, component,
unit, or subsystem shall have the remaining unexpired warranty of
the original component, unit or subsystem.
4 . Ownership and Title. Upon acceptance by the City and
order of payment of contract amounts to Hackney less any
adjustments for options exercised by the City, ownership and title
of such vehicles shall pass to the City of Kent. The Contract
amount for each vehicle is inclusive of all costs to Hackney,
including transportation and insurance, for delivery of said
vehicles to the City of Kent, excluding state sales taxes to be
collected by the City. Acceptance occurs after projected delivery
of said vehicles in Kent by Hackney at no cost to the City and
completion of testing of said vehicles by the City.
5. Acceptance Dates. Notwithstanding paragraph 4 of
Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale, the prices stated on
Quotation Document are contingent upon acceptance within sixty (60)
days of the quotation date. If signed quotation is received by
sender more than sixty (60) days after the quotation date, prices
will be subject to re-quote, and review by purchaser.
Purchaser:
City of Kent
By:
Dan Kelleher, Mayor
r
Witness:
Marie Jensen, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Sandra Driscoll, City Attorney
Seller:
Title:
Date:
a�
Designers/Manufacturers of TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS
NATIONAL SALES OFFICE:400 HACKNEY AVENUE,PO BOX 880.WASHINGTON,N C27889-0880
EMERGENCY SUPPORT VEHICLE
QUOTATION
To: City of Kent Fire Dept. Date: May 4, 1990
220 4th Avenue, South Attn: Bill Johnson
Kent, Washington 98302-5895 by: Jerry Evans
DESCRIPTION BASE PRICE
3-ESV-8.27 with 82/57 height 24000.00
CHASSIS - ISUZU FTR7 28744.00
Dp - Fuel Tank 225.00
Total Adjust. shelves ( 18 @ 140) 2520.00
Total unistrut for shelves (6 @ 95) 570.00
No lettering 0.00
Tow hook on rear 150.00
Air Horns under bumper 325.00
(2) Unity 225P spot lights on cab 350.00
Indicator light on Cole Hersee switch 50.00
TO ENTER ORDER-
Total Price Please sign and return this 56,934.00
copy to home office.Retain
Delivery other copy for your files. $2500.00
Please Note:
Wheelhousing area has a 19" starter partition wall.
ISUZU chassis, Std. tires are 11Rx22.5 14 ply Yokohama or Bridgestone brand
with disc wheels.
The #R87460 is for tubeless tires. . . not tube type tires.
Air Horns to be mounted under front bumper, not enough room to mount in
bumper,
Accepted: Accepted: ACKNEY At�P SONS, Inc.
By:
By:
C df��✓�
Date: Date: S-S�
Price does not include any state or local taxes.
Prices will remain firm for 30 days from date of quotation.
MANUFACTURING FACILITIES: WASHINGTON. NORTH CAROLINA/INDEPENDENCE• KANSAS
TELEPHONE: TOLL FREE 800-334-0711 NATIONWIDE(IN N. C.800-682-8520)TWX 510-924-1897
A SUBSIDIARY OF Of HACKNEY INDUSTRIES.INC.
BEVERAGE BODIES
STANDARD TERMS AND CCNDITiaNS OF SALE
1. ACCEPTANCE: All orders are subject to acceptance at seller's office in Washington, North Carolina. Field representatives may
not make final commitments on behalf of seller. Any purchase order received from buyer shall be merely a confirmation of this
order and any terms of such purchase order conflicting with terms hereon shall not be a part of this agreement.
2. TERMS: a. Terms of sale are net F.O.B.Hackney factory.
b. A deposit of $1,000 for each body ordered shall be due and payable upon acceptance of the order by the seller,
as evidenced by written acknowledgement to buyer.
c. This order will be scheduled for production at the earliest possible date. For truck bodies only, if buyer's chassis
has not arrived by the time assembly of the body is complete, a progress payment equal to the net price of the body and
body extras will become due and payable on the later of
(1) when the body has been completed and no chassis has been received,or
(2) 90 days from the date the order was entered.
d. Final payment: Terms for final payment are net cash upon completion of the unit and certification of its availability
for delivery to the customer at the Hackney plant.
e. Interest: Interest will be added to all amounts due over 30 days, and will be computed at an annual percentage
rate of 18 percent.
3. DISCOUNTS: a. Discounts apply only to the price of the body and extras, and are not retroactive to previous orders.
b. Discounts are contingent upon prompt payment of invoice in addition to quantity purchased. Discount will
be forfeited on invoices paid more than 15 days after receipt of invoice or unit, whichever is later.
4. GENERAL: Prices stated hereon are contingent upon acceptance within thirty 130) days of the quotation date.If signed quotation
is received by seller more than thirty (30) days after quotation date, prices will he subject to adjustment to then-current prices.
5. CORRECTION OF ERRORS:Seller reserves the right to make corrections in typographical or arithmetical errors.
6. SUPPLEMENTAL ORDERS AND ADDITIONS: Orders subsequent to and which supplement or add to an original order will become
part of the original order upon acceptance by both buyer and seller. Prices fnr changes in the original order will be governed
by the price of time and materials necessary to effect the changes.
7. CANCELLATIONS: No cancellations may be made without penalty once order is accepted by both buyer and seller. Penalties
for such cancellations include, but are not limited to, forfeiture of all deposits, restocking charges, and charges for work already
completed on the unit(s). Such penalties are immediately due and payable upon cancellation.
8. TAXES: All Federal State and local taxes, whether stated in original quotation or not, shall be the obligation of the buyer and
payable to the seller at time of delivery unless proof of legal tax exemption is furnished.
9. DELAYS IN DELIVERY: Seller will not be responsible for any expenses, damages, or other losses incurred by buyer as a result
of deviations from estimated date of delivery.
10, WARRANTY AND LIMITATIONS: At buyer's request, seller will furnish a separate written limited warranty statement to buyer
at time of delivery. Seller's responsibility for fulfillment of warranty will be limited to the express terms and conditions of this
limited warranty statement. THE LIMITED WARRANTY REFERRED TO IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL BE IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER
WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, OR
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Oral statements made by seller's agents do not constitute warranties, shall not be relied
upon as such by buyer, and are not part of the contract of sale. If buyer experiences difficulties believed to be covered by
warranty, he should communicate with seller immediately. SELLER WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYMENT OF ANY
CHARGES INCURRED BY BUYER FOR CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES COVERED BY LIMITED WARRANTY UNLESS EXPRESS
WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION HAS BEEN GRANTED FOR THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS WORK.
11. TOLERANCES: Products sold hereunder shall be subject to sellers standard manufacturing variations, tolerances, and
classifications. Where overall specifications are based on truck specifications supplied by buyer or truck manufacturer, seller will
not be responsible for deviations in overall specifications if caused by deviation of truck specifications from information supplied.
12. THIRD PARTY INVOICING: Any buyer requesting that his units be invoiced to a third party acknowledges that compliance by
seller shall in no way affect its contractual obligations with seller, and buyer guarantees payment to seller.
13. DELIVERY INSURANCE AND LICENSE PLATES: Seller's vehicle insurance only covers vehicles operated by seller's employees and
using seller's manufacturer's license plates. Where seller's manufacturer's license plates are provided for vehicles during delivery
trips by buyer, they are furnished solely to comply with state licensing requirements during delivery. While using such plates,
buyer agrees to take a reasonably direct route to his destination, agrees not to haul commercial loads, agrees to avoid illegal
acts while using such plates, and agrees to promptly return such plates after reaching destination.
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5. 1990
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: AUDIO VISUAL EQUIPMENT FOR ALL FACILITIES
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bids were received on May 9 and
acceptance is recommended as follows:
Photo and Sound Co. $15, 624.60
Inland Audio Visual Co. $ 3 , 923 .49
Proline Industries, Inc. $50,909.70
r
I
i
r'
3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary
r
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo � Fire Chief and Firefighter Pat
Pawlak Furnishings Mana er i
(Committee, Staff, Exami er, Commission, etc. )
5. UNEUDGETED FISCAL PERSO L IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCALLPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED• $70,457.79
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety Bond Levy
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACyTIOW�
Councilmember Y �'/-t ��)`, moves, Councilmember '�`� seconds
to award the bids as recommended.
DISCUSSION:_ j✓
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5B
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
JUNE 5, 1990
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS, WHITE
DOWELL, JOHNSON, HOUSER, MANN, ORR
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: AUDIO VISUAL EQUIPMENT FOR ALL FACILITIES
------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
In order to get maximum benefit in purchasing, we waited on all
the projects to go out for bid on the majority of the audio
visual equipment at one time. While there are still some items
to be purchased, this equipment will meet significant needs for
audio visual equipment at the North End, East Hill, West Hill and
Downtown facilities. The bids were advertised in such a manner
as to allow us to get the lowest cost package while meeting the
specified needs. After analyzing the bids, the individual items
were segregated to create the lowest bid combinations. We found
the lowest bidders to be: Photo and Sound Company in the amount
of $15, 624 . 60 ; Inland Audio Visual Company in the amount of
$3 , 923 . 49 ; Proline Industries, Inc. in the amount of $50, 909 .70.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The fire department is recommending that the above named vendors
be awarded the bids for audio visual equipment in the amounts
specified.
SIGNIFICANCE
This will allow for the audio visual portion of the new station
construction to be complete.
BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT
This has been budgeted through the bond levy with no impact on
the general operating budget of the fire department.
exesumay.wpf
Executive Summary to Mayor Kelleher and Councilmembers
June 5, 1990
Page 2
ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES
None
tcn
exesumay.wpf
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5. 1990
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: AERIAL LADDER TRUCK - BIDS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Two bids were received on May 11.
recommendied that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, Mays
Equipment Company, for a Pierce Aerial Ladder Truck at
$408, 645. 03 including tax and options. j
I
i
i
I
3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Administratlion
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERSONNEL MPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Reco ended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $40 645. 03 including tax
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Already Oedicated Public Safety Bonds _ -
i
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
to award the bid for the aerial ladder truck as recommended,
DISCUSSION:
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 5C
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
JUNE 51 1990
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS
COUNCILMEMBERS WHITE, JOHNSON, HOUSER, DOWELL
MANN, ORR
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF �I
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
AERIAL LADDER TRUCK
---------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
Bid were opened for the construction of an aerial ladder truck on
May 11, 1990. Two vendors responded to advertising. The
following is information concerning their bids.
Mays Equipment Co and Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.
Price of basic unit with specific equipment $373,969 . 00
Sales tax 30 , 291. 49
404 , 260.49
Remote Aerial Controls 4 , 056 . 00
Sales tax 328 . 54
4 , 384 . 54
TOTAL PRICE WITH OPTIONS & SALES TAX $408, 645.03
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Simon Ladder Towers Inc. (LTI)
Price of basic unit with specific equipment $389, 356. 00
Sales tax 31 , 537 . 84
420r893 . 84
Remote Aerial Controls Not Available
Sales tax N/A
N/A
TOTAL PRICE WITH OPTIONS & SALES TAX $420,893 .84
exesumla.wpf
Executive Summary to Mayor Kelleher and Councilmembers
June 5, 1990
Page 2
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Based on review of the two (2) bid proposals, the Fire Department
recommends awarding the bid to the low bidder, Mays Equipment
Company for a Pierce aerial ladder truck and authorizing the
Mayor to sign the contract.
SIGNIFICANCE
This will allow for the proposed apparatus to be delivered in a
timely manner.
BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT
This has been budgeted through the bond levy with no impact on
the general operating budget of the fire department.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES
None
tcn
exesumla.wpf
/� . Kent City Council Meeting
I/ V Date June 5, 1990
r Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: FURNITURE FOR EAST HILL PUBLIC SAFETY COMPLEX
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: One bid was received on May 29 for oak
furniture from Oaktree Decorating Center in Kent at $18, 149.89
including tax and delivery, �/ recommendQei that this bid
be accepted. 7y 1
f �. (.t..1 -
c-
1
1-
3 . EXHIBITS: Execute Summary
1
-1
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: N)61 An elo Fire Chief and Firefighter Pat
Pawlak Furnishi na er
(Committee, Staff, F/kaminer, Commission, etc. )
i
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PE FISCAL/PE ONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL PERSONNEL TE Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED $-n 149 .89 includingtax and deliver
SOURCE OF FUNDS : Publ ' ' afet Bond Levy
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:.,
Councilmember 1 y', c�., K"v'k moves, Councilmember seconds
Bid be awarded for certain oak furniture to Oaktree Decorating
Center in the amount of $18, 149. 89 including tax and delivery.
DISCUSSION: dot
ACTION• �-
Council Agenda
Item No. 5D
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
JUNE 5, 1990
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS, WHITE
DOWELL, JOHNSON, HOUSER, MANN, ORR
FROM: NORM ANGELOI FIRE CHIEF G j
SUBJECT: BIDS FOR OAK FURNITURE FOR EAST HILL COMPLEX
---------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
Given the long wearing and durability of hard wood, dining and
conference room tables, dining room chairs and beds were
specified in oak. After having advertised, in accordance with
City policy, and mailing bid packets to four (4) prospective
vendors, we received one responsive bid. This bid was consistent
with previously advertised bids for prior construction projects.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The fire department is recommending that Oak Tree Decorating
Center in Kent be awarded the bid.
SIGNIFICANCE
This will allow for the proposed furnishings to be delivered in a
timely manner.
BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT
This has been budgeted through the bond levy with no impact on
the general operating budget of the fire department.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES
None
tcn
exesumf.wpf
Kent City Council Meeting
L
Date June 5, 1990
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: GENERAL FURNISHINGS FOR ENTIRE EAST HILL COMPLEX
L'l' (;; I C,
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bids w444"4ae opened on June 4,&ndm*JaP__
that the bids for furnish inc &ast Nill complex be
to: Commercial Office lnter..,:ns_ ythe amount of $40 , 204 . 53 ;
Treadwel ' s Office Products n th,_ amount of $26 , 555 . 85
Western Office Furniture in she amount of $12 , 456 . 83 and
finally Business Interiors Northwest in the amount of
$8 , 373 . 43 .
6tivv
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Norm Angelo, Fire Chief and Firefighter Pat
Pawlak, Furnishings Manager
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: this information will be presented the
night of the council meeting
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety Bond Levy
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
'Councilmember Ma'na., moves, Councilmember seconds
That the bids for furnishings for the East Hill Complex be
/-�
awarded to L'_-V'X_rL)
in the amount of q() ':-� C' V 15 3
b Ile—
DISCUSSION: YLA)
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5E
sue"
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
JUNE 5, 1990
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS, WHITE
DOWELL, JOHNSON, HOUSER, MANN, ORR
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF"/ ' � C(
SUBJECT: BIDS FOR GENERAL FURNISHINGS FOR ENTIRE EAST HILL
COMPLEX
---------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
The east hill complex will serve as fire administration, police
substation, fire station, police/fire training center, emergency
operations center (EOC) and an indoor shooting range. The
general furniture for the entire facility is included in these
bids. While these bids will not completely outfit the facility,
it is most certainly a significant portion of that package. Bids
were advertised in such a manner to allow us to pick the
components which would give us the best overall low price without
compromising the specifications. Once the bids have been
analyzed, we will recommend awarding to the low bidders at the
June 5th Council meeting due to opening of bids on June 4th.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The fire department will recommend awarding to the low bidders.
SIGNIFICANCE
This will allow for the proposed furnishi ,,Vs to be delivered in a
timely manner.
BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT
This has been budgeted through the bond levy with no impact on
the general operating budget of the fire department.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES
None
exesumf.wpff
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5 . 1990
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was held May 23 with three
bids received. \All bids exceeded the engineer's estimate. rt 5
WrrecommenddW�he bids be rejected, the plans be modified, and
the project re-advertised. i
3 . EXHIBITS: None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT• NO x YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS•
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
l
Councilmember �di;` moves, Councilmember C7lseconds
the bids received for the West Valley Highway signal improvement
project be rejected and the project re-advertised with
appropriate modifications.
DISCUSSION•
i�JI "ry
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 5F
YYY Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5 , 1990
I� Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: LID 330 - 64TH AVENUE SOUTH STREET IMPROVEMENTS
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was held April 17. The low
bid was submitted by Robison Construction in the amount of
$3 , 141, 568 . 28 . it recommend, this bid be accepted.
f
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Director o:r Public Works with bid
summary.
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner,t' Commission, etc. )
i
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNFI�. IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Reo6ommended Not Recommended
i
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: I
SOURCE OF FUNDS: /
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember &-41 moves, Councilmember + seconds
4- I t,
the bid submitted by Robison Construction for LID 330 be
accepted. lid
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 5G
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 15 , 1990
TO: Mayor Kelleher
City Council
.n'�l/l
FROM: Don Wickstrop, Director of Public Works
RE: LID 330 - 64th Avenue Street Improvement
Bid opening was April 17th with eight bids received. The low bid
was submitted by Robison Construction company in the amount of
$3 , 141, 568 . 28 .
This project provides improvements to existing portions of 64th
Avenue South between West Meeker Street and West James Street, and
between South 216th Street and South 212th Street, and construction
of an entirely new roadway between West James Street and South
228th Street. Construction costs are estimated to be approximately
$3 , 455, 725 . 11. It is recommended the bid submitted by Robison
Construction Company be accepted.
BID SUMMARY
Robison Construction Co. $3 , 141, 568 . 28
R. W. Scott Construction Co. $3 , 416, 849 . 96
Tucci & Sons, Inc. $3 , 462 , 796 . 11
Active Construction $3 , 571, 842 . 57
Gary Merlino Construction $3 , 995, 824 . 28
Scoccolo Construction $4 , 409 , 165 . 92
Tri State Construction $4 , 494 , 123 . 80
West Coast Construction $4 , 835, 849 . 51
Engineers Estimate $4 , 322 , 770 . 17
Kent City Council Meeting
r v Date June 5 . 1990
i
ld�N Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: RADIAL CAMERA
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Three bids were received with the low bid
submitted -by� CUES, Inc. in the amount of $26, 916.90. a s
recommenA*,Nhis bid be accepted.
k�, � fi 71
i> . /I[!
�Ut
IIl
1
i c
l ,U �A2 .� 1-41
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Operations Manager and Utility
Superintendent.
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL,/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember U`, moves, Councilmember � 'Y1�� seconds
the bid submitted by CUES, Inc. be awarded in the amount of
$26, 916. 90 for the radial view camera.
DISCUSSION• r
ACTION:
Council Agenda
. , Item No. 5H
sN
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 8 , 1990
TO: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Wo
FROM: Tim Heydon, Operations Manager /I
SUBJECT: Bids on 360 degree Radial View Camera
I agree with Nelden Hewitt' s recommendation that we accept the bid
submitted by CUES, Inc. in the amount of $26, 916. 90 for the
360 degree Radial View Camera.
TH/map
CC: Nelden D. Hewitt, Utilities Superintendent
A072A01
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 10, 1990
TO: Tim Heydon, Operations Manager
FROM: Nelden D. Hewitt, Utilities SuperintendentaCT&
SUBJECT: Bids on 360 degree Radial View Camera
We received three bids on the 360 degree Radial View Camera. The
bids are as follows:
Flexible Video Systems $29 , 457 . 25
Utility Equipment Inc. $27 , 025. 00
CUES, Inc. $26, 916 . 90
I recommend that the bid be awarded to the low bidder, CUES, Inc.
They meet all specifications and requirements of the bid. This is
$916. 90 over what I have in the budget.
NH/map
cc: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works
S028C04
Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5 1990
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: SURPLUS TELEMETRY
2 • SUMMARY STATEMENT: Surplus water and sewer telemetry
equipment was advertised for sale with bid opening on May 16.
Only one bid was received for the water telemetry equipment and ,,.
no bids we a received for the sewer telemetry equipment. S
recommend the bid received from Arrera Engineering for the
surplus water .t lemetry equipment in the amount of $2,972.75 be
accept edankia rc the sewer telemetry
equipment be scrapped f
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Tim Heydon
i.
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember LiL) moves, Councilmember - i _seconds
the bid in the amount of $2, 972.75 from Arrera Engineering for
sale of surplus water telemetry equipment be accepted, and the
surplus sewer telemetry equipment be scrapped.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5I
CITY OF KENT
MEMORANDUM 14QY
ENGINEERING DEPT.
DATE: May 18, 1990
TO: Don Wickstrom, Director of Publli/"ork
FROM: Tim Heydon, Operations Manager
SUBJECT: Bid to Sell Surplus Telemetry
Only one bid was submitted at the May 16th bid opening for the
Surplus Water Telemetry. I recommend that we accept the single bid
of $2,972 .75 submitted by Arrera Engineering, 85350 Svarverud Road,
Eugene, Oregon 97405 for the miscellaneous Telemetry. This revenue
should be allocated 100% to the Water Division.
As there were no bids for the Sewer Alarm Decoders, I recommend
that this equipment be scrapped.
DS/map
cc: Leland Fingerson, Water Superintendent
Nelden Hewitt, Utilities Superintendent
W030001
i
_ rq, Kent City Council Meeting
/� ,-� �" Date June 5. 1990
Category Bids
1. SUBJECT: RIDING MOWER
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Four bids were received for the purchase
of a riding lawnmower with a low bid submitted by Western
Equipment in the amount of $10,885. 40. However, they have
indicated that they„will be unable to deliver the equipment as
bid. Therefore- recommender the purchase be awarded to
the second low bidder, Superior Turf, in the amount of
$11, 519 . 95.
l
3 . EXHIBITS: Memoran um from Fleet Manager
1
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staf
(Committee, Staff, xaminer, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERS NNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: ecommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
V
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember L`�.ff'� P4'1 J
moves, Councilmember ��1l4.-'L.- seconds
'�kV'
the bid submitted by Superior Turf in the amount of $11, 519 �5 11�.
be accepted for the purchase of a riding lawnmower.
DISCUSSION:_ "� 1
ACTION• rY
Council Agenda
Item No. 5J
s U
MEMORANDUM
EQUIPMENT RENTAL DIVISION
DATE: May 25, 1990
TO: Don Wickstrom, Director of Public Works
FROM: Jack Spencer, Fleet ManageY-gA�
SUBJECT: Riding Mower Purchase/Vegetation
Four bids were submitted for this morning' s bid opening.
1. Machinery Components Inc. Mower (Turf Blazer) $ 12, 080. 25
Seattle, WA Option J 1, 881. 25
Total Bid $ 13 , 961. 50
2 . Western Equipment Mower (Toro) $ 12 , 755. 80
Kent, WA Option J 2 ,156 . 60
Total Bid $ 14 , 912 . 40
3 . Superior Turf Mower (Jacobson) $ 11, 519 . 95
Auburn, WA Option J 2 , 589 . 00
Total Bid $ 14, 108 . 95
4 . Western Equipment Mower (Cushman) $ 10,895. 40
Kent, WA Option J 1, 945. 80
Total Bid $ 12 , 841. 20
I have received a memo from Western Equipment stating they cannot guarantee
delivery of this machine with adapters for mounting a flail type mower.
These parts have been discontinued for this machine.
I recommend we accept the next low bid of $ 11 , 519 . 95 for the Jacobson Mower,
without Option J, submitted by Superior Turf of Auburn, Washington.
JS/map
Attachment: Capital. Outlay
cc: Tim Heydon, Operations Manager
Marie Jensen, City Clerk
Leland Fingerson, Water Superintendent
Karen Siegel, Administrative Assistant
Dianne Sullivan, Administrative Assistant
E036CO2
Y
Equipment Distributors Inc.
SEAT=MAIN OFFICE • 20224 80th Ave.S.,Kent.WA 98032 (206)872-8858 FAX:(206)872.6942
SPOKANE • E.2824 Garland,Spokane,WA 99207 (509)483-8665 FAX:(609)483-7563
May 29 , 1990
Mr. Jack Spencer
City of Kent
Dear Jack,
In reference to your bid on the front mounted flail mower.
At the time the bid was submitted Western Equipment was under
the impression that a flail deck was available for the
Cushman Model #807 which I understand was low bid. After
checking on shipping times I was informed that the flail deck
for this unit is unavailable and is discontinued.
At this time Western Equipment would like to withdraw it' s
bid on the Cushman Model #807 with flail deck.
I am personally sorry for any inconveniences this may cause
you or the City of Kent.
Sincerely
Dick Bergeron
Division Manager
Commercial Products
DB: rc
1 1
� rV Kent City Council Meeting
Date June 5 , 1990
Category Bids
SUBJECT: CAMBRIDGE AND REITH ROAD TANK REPAINT
SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was May 3o and only two bids
were received, both of which exceeded the engineer's estimate.
After review of the bids, it was determined the bid documents
14 may have been unclear, leading to higher bids than anticipated.
Y> Since only two bids were received and there was a significant
, J� difference�een these two, and both exceeded the engineer's
.i' estimate, �i recommend4id that the bids be rejected, the bid
documents be amended and clarified, and the project b
re-advertised. (A.11'l IZ C >c (7ttc 1 ci'c-c
3 . EXHIBITS: None
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:: ,�
Councilmember fI'�, al _ moves, Councilmember _ '-L seconds
the bids received for the Cambridge and Reith Road tank repaint
project be rejected and the project re-advertised once
appropriate amendments are complete.
DISCUSSION• / 1 -<
ACTION:
-
Council Agenda
Item No. 5K
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE 1�
i
1
D. PLANNING COMMITTEE
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
F. PARKS COMMITTEE
� 1
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
May 8, 1990
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Christi Houser
Jon Johnson
Paul Mann
STAFF PRESENT: Ed Chow
Sandra Driscoll
Jim Hansen
Charlie Lindsey
Tony McCarthy
Jim Miller
Kelli O'Donnell
Sue Viseth
MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC: Lyle Price
Sharon Richards
APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS
All claims for the period ending April 30, 1990 in the amount of
$909, 224 . 83 were aproved for payment.
AWARDING OF CITY BANKING SERVICES
Finance Director McCarthy gave an overview of the request to award
city banking services. Four proposals were received from Seafirst
Bank, U.S. Bank, Security Pacific Bank and Puget Sound Bank.
Review of these responses showed that U.S. Bank of Washington, our
current bank, provided the required services at the lowest cost to
the city, showing an annual savings of about $2, 356. Staying with
U.S. Bank would also eliminate wasted time and expense converting
over to a new bank system.
In addition, U.S . Bank had the capabilities and was willing to work
with the city in:
o expanding credit card services
o Safe Keep of Investments
o Direct Payroll Deposit
o Utility Payments Telecommunication
o Employee Accounts
For these reasons it was recommended the city banking services be
awarded to U.S. Bank for a three year contract.
The Operations Committee recommended this to Council by a vote of
3-0.
COUNCIL CHAMBER CARPET AND SOUND
Assistant City Administrator Hansen discussed with the Committee
the modifications to the Council Chamber and Courtroom meeting
rooms proposed by Customer Services Manager Lindsey. The
recommendation was to recarpet both rooms, remove some benches to
create two aisles, and to upgrade the sound system as recommended
by a consultant. The total cost of these improvements would be
$18, 000.
It was pointed out that the original carpet was becoming a safety
hazard due to holes and ri�ples. The discussion also noted that
the aisles would, fadilit�e people moving in and out of the benches
which would improve public- access, to address the Council.
Customer Services Manager Lindsey noted that the consultant had
pointed out that the current sound system could be upgraded to
improve the public' s ability to address the council. He suggested
a moveable microphone in the middle of the chamber as well as
improving the overall sound system by adding new microphones for
the Councilmembers and improvement of the basic sound equipment.
He also noted that the new carpet would be patchable to facilitate
any change in seating arrangements needed at a later date.
Assistant City Administrator Hansen proposed a three year plan to
.finish improvements to the Council Chamber and Courtroom in order
to break up the cost and assure compatibility with future
improvements.
The Operations Committee recommended approval on a 3-0vote and
asked Councilmember Houser submit a report to Council at the next
meeting.
ATTORNEY STAFFING REQUEST
City Attorney Driscoll addressed the membership regarding the
urgent need for additional staffing in the City Attorney' s office.
The additional workload of the office includes the increased
complexity of DWI cases with more coming to trial and the
breathalizer test becoming a less effective tool for prosecution.
The office has no time for follow through on domestic violence
cases. The addition of the new Complaint for Citation form
requiring staff to fill out 150-200 forms per week. The City
Attorney's staff has spent 872 hours on forefeitures since last
May. More appeals are being filed requiring more time.
The law requires 90 days to bring a case to trial or it will be
dismissed. This time constraint compounded with the increased
workload is causing the City Attorney' s office to deal more cases;
is not allowing victim/witness overview; and is not allowing '
discovery to be given in a timely manner.
It was requested that a full-time attorney and half-time support
staff be added to the Legal Department. The Legal Department was
willing to forego the $14 , 000 budgeted for outside prosecutors so
these monies would be available for funding the full-time position.
City Attorney Driscoll informed the committee that the Public
Safety Committee directed the Administration and Law Departments
to examine the need for additional staffing of an attorney and
half-time support staff person. Judge Phillipson of Aukeen
District Court had raised concerns of the impact the work overload
on the Legal Department was having on the Aukeen District Court.
She also noted that this overload was impacting the police
department.
Finance Director McCarthy raised the possibility of funding the
additional staff through the seized assets program. There is
currently a negative balance of $250K but this amount should be
recouped as soon as property is sold. Councilmember Mann pointed
out that the seized assets fund must be used on new projects that
are related directly to drug enforcement. Captain Miller pointed
out that Chief Fredrickson supports a grant from these funds to the
Legal Department.
Councilmember Houser asked about the possibility of hiring a half
time support person with the $14 , 000 budgeted for a half-time
attorney. City Attorney Driscoll stated that without a new
attorney full time, those funds will be needed for cases pending.
After discussion Councilmember Mann moved that the City Attorney
and the Finance Department should look into the possibility of
allocating funds to an attorney devoted to drug activity to be
funded by the seized assets fund in order to free up general budget
for additional staff. It was also moved that if a solution had not
been reached by the end of June the City Administrator should come
back to the Operations Committee with the issue. The motion passed
3-0.
MUNICIPAL COURT FEASIBILITY STUDY
City Attorney Driscoll asked that the Municipal Court Feasibility
Study be recommended to Council. The agreement would have a lid
of $8 , 000 to be equally shared with Auburn. The report would be
due by July 16, 1990.
After discussion of the purpose of the court and other cities
progress in this area, it was recommended for the consent calendar.
CONCESSIONS BY THE PARK DEPARTMENT
Finance Director asked the Operations Committee to recommend to the
Council a line of credit to the Park Department for purchase of
concessions. Interest would be charged on the monies at the going_
rate. A discussion followed whether the city should be involved
in concessions. It was agreed that a decision should be made by
1993 as to whether the city should remain in the business.
Councilmember Johnson moved that the request for a line of credit
should be put on the consent calendar. The motion passed 3-0.
rt-'
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
MAY 1, 1990
PRESENT: Steve Dowell Marty Nizlek
Jim White Bill Williamson
Leona Orr Charles Kiefer
Gary Gill John Kiefer
Don Wickstrom Tom Burdick
Kent Springs Transmission Main
Charles Kiefer acknowledged having received a written response to
the issues he raised before Council. He stated he felt the project
was well engineered but though it failed on the environmental
standpoint. He distributed a document identifying several areas
he felt the City had failed to follow code and cited a few of
these. He requested the DNS be withdrawn. Williamson stated it
was the opinion of the City Attorney that there was not a mandatory
withdrawal of the DNS needed because there has not been any finding
by the SEPA responsible official of any misrepresentation by the
City. White asked what would happen if it were withdrawn.
Williamson stated it would start the process all over again. White
asked if it were a Council decision. Williamson responded it is
the decision of the SEPA responsible official who is Jim Harris,
Planning Director. Orr asked if Council had any authority to
order the withdrawal of the DNS. Williamson confirmed that they
did not at this stage. Addressing Mr. Kiefer' s concerns about the
404 , Williamson stated that the Corps acknowledged they did not
have the most current information on the state certification. It
was further determined that if Mr. Kiefer wants to request
withdrawal of the DNS he would do that to the SEPA responsible
official and that the Public Works Committee and City Council have
no authority at this time.
Gill stated that we would proceed with the phase of the project
over which the Corps has no jurisdiction. That is the portion
designated as Phase I of the project from 132nd and Kent Kangley
down to 124th. Gill confirmed construction of this phase would not
affect any realignment that might be required.
Responding to Dowell ' s questions, Kiefer indicated his group were
supportive of change without damage to the environment. He
indicated what he felt was a more appropriate alignment. Gill
indicated that proposal would require the line to be about 50 feet
deep and would require pumping which means hundreds of thousands
of dollars per year which would have to be passed on to the City
of Kent water customers. Gill continued that it has already been
determined that pumping is not an alternative so the alignment will
either be through the wetlands and the City will get the 404 permit
Public Works Committee
May 1, 1990
Page 2
and mitigate the impacts or it will be realigned and address
whatever other impacts - which may be greater on the neighborhoods
- might be. The Corps will take these issues into consideration
during the 404 permit process.
Kiefer asked for further clarification of the explanation why the
Muckleshoot Indian tribe wasn't notified. Gill explained that at
the time the Fisheries Department determined they would not require
a permit on that portion of the project and on the portion they did
require a permit we were able to bore under the creek thereby not
affecting any resources of the tribe. Now the Fisheries Department
is requiring a permit.
Burdick asked about the size of the main being replaced, whether
the project was included in the Water Comp Plan, if the DNS was
issued for the whole project, is the project in our franchise area,
are there services provided from the main and was the project
approved by the County. Wickstrom and Gill responded the new pipe
will be 30" in some areas, 36" in others; is a part of the Comp
Plan, the DNS was issued for the whole project, no services are
provided and was approved by King County Council, in addition there
is an interlocal agreement between Kent, Water District 111 and
Auburn allowing us to place the main through an area for which they
have the franchise.
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
MAY 15, 1990
PRESENT: Jim White Marty Nizlek
Steve Dowell Marci Hobbs
Leona Orr Sherry Lindsey
Don Wickstrom Jim Henry
Gary Gill Bill Swiger
Jim Hansen Mr. & Mrs. Rust
Bill Williamson Betty Lou Kapela
Banner Advertising Cornucopia Days
Marci Hobbs presented her request to display banners across City
streets advertising the Lettuce Festival in conjunction with Kent
Cornucopia Days . After discussion, the Committee unanimously
recommended approval of the banners subject to the proper insurance
being submitted to the City. Ms. Hobbs will submit a schedule of
when the banners will be placed and taken down as well as the
proposed locations to the Public Works Department for presentation
to the Council at their June 5 meeting.
Request for Closure - 45th Place by Westridge and S. 240th Street
vicinity of Highway 99
Nizlek reviewed the proposals as outline in his memo included in
the Committee ' s packet. After discussion, the Committee requested
that design and cost estimates for temporary closure of these two
locations be brought back before the Committee.
Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan for Seattle-King Countv
Wickstrom reviewed the intent and goal of the Plan and commented
that while the Plan is well thought out to address the issue of
disposal of hazardous wastes generated by households and small
quantity generators, the Cities do not have control over the rate
structure affecting our customers. It was recommended we adopt
the plan contingent upon an agreement being reached through the
Interlocal Forum on the first year budget, details of the funding
mechanism, evaluation strategy and manner of representation on the
Management Coordination Committee by participating cities. After
discussion the Committee unanimously recommended approval subject
to the amendment mentioned.
Metro Sewage Disposal Agreement
Wickstrom explained that Metro is requesting an amendment to their
existing contract to change the residential equivalent from 900
cubit feet to 750 cubic feet which reduces the rate to the single
Public Works Committee
May 15, 1990
Page 3
White asked that we look at the possibility of a left turn pocket
on 94th in the area of the Nazarene Church and if it would be
feasible. Nizlek commented it would be costly. Wickstrom added
essentially it would be for one user and could set a precedent.
White asked that something be brought back to the Committee on the
possibility.
Other
White asked for an update on the railroad tracks on 228th. Nizlek
responded he would recommend posting a sign "Rough Crossing Ahead"
until construction of the railroad crossing improvements which is
anticipated to be June or July of this year.
White asked about the status of the Canyon Road project. Gill
replied that we have acquired easements and right of way on a
couple of the parcels but there will definitely be some that may
require condemnation.
CITY G�s�r1r
CITY OF ���
CORRECTION TO MINUTES
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
VINCTA MAY 15 , 1990
ITEM
94th Between Canyon and James
Second paragraph of item is corrected to read:
"White asked that we look at the possibility of a left turn pocket
on 94th James in the area of the Nazarene Church and if it would
be feasible. Nizlek commented it would be costly. Wickstrom added
essentially it would be for one user and could set a precedent.
White asked that something be brought back to the Committee on the
possibility. "
a+ A
2204th AVE. SO.,/ KENT, WASHING TON 98032-5895/ TELEPHONE (206)859-3300