HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 05/15/1990 Cot of Kent
y
Coty
Agenda
�d
Mayor Dan Kelleher
Council Members
Judy Woods, President
Leona Orr Steve Dowell
Christi Houser Jon Johnson
Paul Mann Jim White
May 15, 1990
Office of the City Clerk
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
May 15, 1990
Summary Agenda
City of Kent Council Chambers
Office of the City Clerk 7: 00 p.m.
NOTE: Items on the Consent Calendar are either routine or
have been previously discussed. Any item may be
removed by a Councilmember. The Council may add and
act upon other items not listed on this agenda.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
A. Public Works Week - Proclamation
B. Kiwanis 60th Birthday - Proclamation
C
o.
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Street Vacation No. STV-90-3 - Portion of 78th P1. S .
B. LID 330 - 64th Avenue - Ordinance r,tc.i
3 . CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of Minutes
B. Approval of Bills
C. Municipality Court Feasibility Study - Interlocal
Agreement
D. Housing Opportunity Fund Grant Application
E. Walnut Grove Preliminary Subdivision No. SU-90-2
F. Cypress Inn - Bill of Sale
G. Banking Services Contract
H. Golf Complex Merchandising Budget
I. Crime Prevention
J. Ordinance Repealing Ordinance 2788
4 . OTHER BUSINESS
A. Naming of Kent-Kherson Peace Park
B. Metro Sewerage Disposal Agreement 2C/.U c�
C. Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan - Resolutions '
D. AFSCME - Washington State Council of County and City
Employees, Local 21-K - Contract /rc`A-S ,�t
5. BIDS e
A. Writing Surfaces - Fire Station
B. LID 330 - 64th Avenue j .w ,. ,{ C 7, / d,
C. Aerator/Parks Golf Complex
6. REPORTS
CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS
ADJOURNMENT t t-ti c=s f f i 11 K-a d, c /C ct t'
PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time,
make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly
heard.
A. Proclamation Public Works Week
B. Proclamation Kiwanis 60th Birthday
Kent City Council Meeting
/1\I %r Date May 15, 1990
Category Public Hearings
1. SUBJECT: STREET VACATION NO. STV-90-3 - PORTION OF 78TH PL. S.
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public hearing will consider a
request by South 202nd Associates of Bellevue to vacate a
portion of 78th P1. S. Proper legal notice has been given by
the City Clerk.
Staff has recommended approval without conditions. �;P' �; r, :- •-
/ r
i
3 . EXHIBITS: staff report and map
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: staff - approval without conditions
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ),"
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: N0� YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS :
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT•
CLOSE HEARING:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember � moves", cbEuncilm�a&er �-,__seconds
i,
to ��€� Sae4�ttt approve as modified street
'Vacation No. STV-90-3 as recommended by staff and to direct the
City Attorney to prepare the necessary ordinance.
e
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2A
KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May 9, 1990
MEMO TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS, PLANNING DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON AN APPLICATION TO VACATE A
PORTION OF 78TH PLACE SOUTH - #STV-90-3
Recommendation: APPROVAL
I . Name of Applicant
South 202nd Associates
4536 153rd Avenue SE
Bellevue, WA 98006
II. Reason for Requesting Vacation
The applicant states, "At the time this parcel was being negotiated, the
sellers were working on a short plat of the property. The purchasers
did not want the short plat and were under the impression that the
process would be terminated.
Unfortunately, the sellers filed two Quit Claim Deeds that would have
been necessary for the short plat, without telling us. The deeds
created the cul de sac shown on the drawing, and it is this area that
we want vacated. We are the only adjoiners. "
III. Staff Recommendation
After reviewing comments from the following departments and agencies:
• Public Works
• Fire
• Washington Natural Gas
and conducting our own review, the Planning Department recommends that
the request to vacate a portion of 78th Place S. as mentioned in
Resolution No. 1241 and shown on the accompanying map, be APPROVED
without conditions.
Don Wickstrom, Kent Public Works Director states, "Under City Ordinance
2333 , this street right-of-way is classified as Class C which states
that compensation therefore may be required. However, because this
right-of-way was deeded to the City as a prelude to a short plat which
didn 't materialize and because the City has spent no monies on same and
no physical street exists, the Public Works Department recommends
approval of this vacation without requiring compensation therefore other
than administrative costs and without reserving any easements thereon. "
JPH: ca
Attachment
E4
W
W
z
o cnz
o � C o
a � � u o � o
cn o f
80TH AVE S.
W
W
'S Id KWL
O
to
WZ
T N
V1 O
i
F.
Kent City Council Meeting
Dat
Category Public Hearings
1. SUBJECT: LID 330 - 64TH AVENUE
2 , SUI+II�ARY STATEMENT: May 15 has been scheduled for the public
hearing on confirmation of the final assessment roll for LID 330
and proper legal notice has been given. The Director of Public
Works will describe the project and manner of assessments.
3 . EXHIBITS: memorandum from Director of Public Works
4 , RECOMMENDED BY: staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT:
NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: —
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
OPEN HEARING:
PUBLIC INPUT•
CLOSE HEARING:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember
moves, Councilmember seconds
that the memorandum from the Director of Public Works be made a
part of the record that the hearing be closed, and that
Ordinance be adopted, confirming the final assessment
roll for LID 330.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 2B
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 151 1990
TO: Mayor Kelleher
City Council
FROM: Don Wickstromu
RE: LID 330: 64th Avenue South Street Improvements
(Meeker Street to South 212th Street)
May 15th has been set for the public hearing for the confirmation
of the final LID assessment roll for LID 330: 64th Avenue South
Street Improvements.
BACKGROUND
The transportation element of the 1980 Valley Studies program
identified 64th Avenue South as a future co lector arterial route
essential for development of this portion of the valley floor. The
actual timing for the installation of 64th Avenue South has been
tied to the pressure applied by the private development along this
corridor and—the w l-lingness of the property owners to fund the
nd --
construction.
Discussions and meetings with several of the involved property
owners indicated that the time was now optimum to form the LID and
thus ORDINANCE NO. 2866 was passed by the City Council which
established LID 330. Preliminary estimates were prepared and an
assessment role was prepared and sent to the property owners
included in the LID.
After several revisions to the preliminary scope of work, LID 330
was advertised for a bid opening of April 17th, 1990.
The Director of Public Works now desires to close the LID in order
to save interim funding costs.
PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS
This project is for the Widening of 64th_ Avenue South from West
--
Smith Street to West James Street; and for the construction of 64th
Avenue South from West James Street to South 228th Street; and for
the construction of 64th Avenue South from South 216th Street to
South 212th Street. Traffic signals shall be installed at West
Meeker Street, West James Street, South 228th Street and South
212th Street.
These proposed improvements reflect the deletion of one portion of
roadway originally included in the project scope. The design of
that portion of roadway and associated improvements between South
226th Street and South 216th Street was complicated by the
proximity to the abandoned sewer lagoons, and the incompleteness
of the plans for the construction of a regional detention
pond/enhanced wetland at that location.
It was determined to delete this portion of the project until the
plans for the detention pond/enhanced wetland were complete, and
to complete the deleted portion of this project via a new LID at
a later date when all environmental impacts could be determined.
The project as now proposed includes the following improvements:
1. Four to five lane roadway, two lanes in each direction with
turn lanes or landscaped medians. The roadway section varies
within the project limits.
2 . Curb and gutter
3 . Cement concrete sidewalks on both sides
4 . open channel and closed pipe storm drainage system
5 . Street lighting
6. Street trees and grass planting strips
7 . Sanitary sewer and watermain extensions; with stubouts as
required
8 . Traffic signals
9 . Landscaped medians and large landscaped planting areas (north
of South 236th Street)
NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS
1. Drainage: Currently there is an inadequate drainage system in
the project area. Ponding and flooding of storm water occurs
often. A complete and adequate drainage system for the area is need
to provide for safe disposal of storm water. A complete storm
drainage system is provided for the area including stubouts to
undeveloped parcels.
2 . Street: The existing portions of 64th Avenue South are
substandard and without such amenities as sidewalks, curbs &
gutters and street lights. These improvements will be installed
at the same time that the new roadway is constructed.
3 . Utilities: Various properties within the area are not
currently hooked up to City water and sanitary sewer or are not
fully serviced for their potential highest and best use. Prior to
constructing the roadway these utilities will be extended beyond
the roadway to avoid future street cuts. Puget Sound Power &
Light, Washington Natural Gas, and US West Communications are also
installing their private utilities as part of this project.
4 . Development Requirement: Undeveloped parcels along the 64th
2
Avenue South corridor which do not yet have access to the new
street and constructed utilities will now have such access. In
addition, some parcels which are already constructed or are under
construction will have additional access to water, sewer,
telephone, electrical power, natural gas, and improved storm
drainage facilities so that they may develop to their full
potential .
PROJECT FUNDING
This project will be funded entirely by Local Improvement District
number 330.
It should be remembered that the project as described above
includes various features not normally installed with City street
improvement projects. These features include landscaped medians,
irrigation systems within the medians, eight foot wide landscaping
stripes between the curb and the sidewalks, and construction of one
over-length box culvert at South 228th Street. These additional
features were requested by Union Pacific Realty Company, one of the
major property owners along the 64th Avenue South corridor. These
additional features are for the most part charged directly to Union
Pacific Realty Company, although the City of Kent is also sharing
with some of these extra costs. The remaining property owners are
being assessed for the cost of a "standard 58 foot roadway" ,
without landscaped 17 foot medians or 8 foot landscaping strips.
Costs not included in the basic LID distribution include:
1. Landscaped median with irrigation system
2 . Extra street tree expenses for number, size or type
3 . Extra wide planting strips between the curb and sidewalks
4 . Additional street lighting required because of the large
trees installed within the landscaped medians
5. Additional right-of-way or easements needed for the wider
roadway section.
6 . Majority of Valley channel and box culvert drainage system
(Assessed to City Property)
3
The total cost breakdown is as follows:
Basic LID distribution (all properties) $4, 065,726 . 84
Costs directly assessed (UPRC and City Only) $1,1281654 . 02
5, 194 , 380. 86
LID total
COST SUMMARY
CATEGORY TOTAL COST
Street $3 , 913 , 613 . 85
Watermain 233 ,318 . 77
Sanitary Sewer 355,406. 51,
Traffic Signals 692 , 041. 73
LID Total $5 , 194 , 380 . 86
LID Credits and Prepayments: $324 ,831.70
Amount to be funded by LID 330: $4 , 869 , 549 . 16
PRELIMINARY CITY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
LANDSCAPING
ASSESSMENT PROPERTY BASIC MEDIANS AND PRELIMINARY
NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT FEES ASSESSMENT
10 & 11 Abandoned sewer
lagoons $673 , 683 . 41 $271, 183 . 76 $944 , 867 . 17
13 Puget Power Right-
of-way acquisition $82 , 736. 16 $24 ,871. 88 $107 , 608 . 04
96 City shops &
Russell Road Park $12 022 70 -0- $12 022 . 70
TOTAL CITY ASSESSMENT $768 , 442 . 27 $296, 055. 64 1, 064 , 497 .91
CURRENT CITY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
WATER, SEWER,
ASSESSMENT PROPERTY BASIC MEDIANS AND CURRENT
NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT VALLEY STORM ASSESSMENT
10 & 11 Abandoned sewer
lagoons -0- $766, 211. 17 $766, 211. 17
96 City Shops &
Russell Road Park $12 733 41 -0- $ 12 733 . 41
TOTAL CITY ASSESSMENT $12 , 733 . 41 $766, 211. 17 $778 ,944 . 58
$834 , 492 . 01
4
BOND RESERVE FUND
A Bond Guarantee Fund is required to protect the bond holders in
case LID 330 assessments are not paid. The City' s current fund is
just sufficient to cover existing outstanding assessments.
Additional LID formations will require the generation of more
guarantee funds. This is being accomplished through the LID
assessments via a larger bond issuance for LID 330. Therefore the
costs herein include an amount equal to about 10% of the total bid
total to provide for the Bond Guarantee Fund.
FORMATION OF THE LID
This LID was formed when the Kent City Council passed ORDINANCE
2866 on August 1, 1989 .
Because of the changes in the project scope (deletion of South
226th Street to South 216th Street, and mitigation requirements
through wetlands along the project corridor) , and the way in which
the total LID costs were distributed to four different subareas
within the LID boundary, some of the current assessments are
slightly higher than the preliminary assessments, while other
current assessments actually went down when compared to the
preliminary assessment roll .
CITY FUNDS
The City is paying for valley drainage system improvements that are
necessary to handle the storm drainage flows expected from adjacent
parcels and from the surface of 64th Avenue South, but that have
always been considered part of LID 306 (not yet formed) .
The City is also paying for a portion of the extra costs associated
with construction of landscaped medians and over-sized landscaped
planting areas, as well as a portion of the costs for watermain and
sanitary sewer costs that significantly increased because of the
revised scope of work for this project.
There are no City funds directly associated with this project, but
there are three City properties which are assessed under this LID.
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The project costs and assessments were calculated separately for
four different sections of the project. These sections are as
follows:
5
North: South 216th Street to South 212th Street
Central: West James Street to South 228th Street
South: West Meeker Street to West James Street
Traffic Signals: West Meeker Street; West James Street
South 228th Street; and South 212th Street
The costs under each category of assessment are distributed to each
property benefitting as follows:
1. Street - The assessments are based upon square footage
within the assessment boundary. The assessment rate decreased
with 100 foot zones back from the public right-of-way with a
maximum of seven zones. The zone rate for the first 100 foot
strip abutting the right-of-way is seven times the zone rate
for the 100 foot strip which begins 600 feet from the edge of
the right-of-way, and so on. Property further than 700 feet
from the edge of right-of-way is not assessed.
2 . Sanitary Sewer - In the central portion of the project, the
assessments are based upon square footage within 350 foot wide
zones. Property more than 350 feet from the edge of right-
of-way is not assessed.
In the south portion of this project there are existing
sanitary sewers and no new stubouts will be constructed, and
thus there is no assessment distribution for sewer on this
portion of the project.
In the north portion of this project, direct stubout costs are
assessed directly to the owners of property receiving
stubouts. If there is no stubout, there is no assessment.
3 . Watermain - . In the north and central portions of this
project, the assessments are based upon square footage within
300 foot wide zones. Property more than 300 feet from the
edge of right-of-way is not assessed.
In the south portion of this project, assessments are made
directly for one property which will receive a standard one
inch water service, and for another property which will have
two existing meters relocated inside of the new sidewalk.
4 .) Traffic Signals - The traffic signal assessment also
involves properties outside the street assessment areas.
Additional properties are assessed which were determined to
contribute significant traffic impacts upon the performance
level of 64th Avenue South.
The costs for each traffic signal benefit area is allocated
to various subareas with the overall LID boundary as follows:
6
AREA INTERSECTION ASSESSED
1. North of South 212th Street (BOEING) 1/2 of South 212th Signal
2 . South of South 212th Street 1/2 of South 212th Signal
3 . North of South 228th Street 1/2 of South 228th Signal
4 . West James Street to South 228th 1/2 of West James Signal
Street
1/2 of South 228th Signal
5 . West Meeker Street to West James 1/2 of West James Signal
Street
1/2 of West Meeker Signal
6. South of West Meeker Street 1/2 of West Meeker Signal
EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION
The construction of the project required property acquisition in
some locations to provide the necessary right-of-way. Slope and
construction easements are also required in places. These
easements and right-of-way were purchased outright in most cases,
but one owner elected to use the cost of the purchase as a credit
toward his LID assessment, thus reducing the total amount of
funding to be financed by the LID.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
The City of Kent Planning Department issued a conditioned DNS for
LID 330 on July 11, 1989 - This project fully meets these
conditions.
The US Department of the Army issued a nationwide permit for
filling within a wetland on December 21, 1989 after the City
proposed mitigation measures to ensure the smallest impact upon the
wetlands along this route.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
Upon Council passing the ordinance confirming the final assessment
roll, there is a 30-day period in which any portion or all of the
assessment can be paid without interest charges. After the 30-day
period, the balance is paid over a fifteen-year period wherein each
year' s payment is one-fifteenth of the principal plus interest on
the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates.
7
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, approving and confirming the
assessments and the assessment roll of Local
Improvement District 330 which has been created
and established for the purposes of street,
sanitary sewer, and water main improvements on
64th Avenue South from South Smith Street to
South 228th Street and from South 216th Street
to South 212th Street in Kent; all as provided
in Ordinance 2866; and levying and assessing
the amount thereof against several lots,
tracts, parcels of land and the properties on
the roll.
WHEREAS, the assessment roll levying the special
assessments against the properties located in Local Improvement
District No. 330 has been filed with the Clerk of the City of Kent
as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of the time and place of hearing thereon )
and of making objections and protests as to the roll was duly
published at and for the time and in the manner provided by law,
fixing a time and place of hearing thereof for the 15th day of
May, 1990, at the hour of 7 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers
of the City Hall of the City of Kent, Washington, and further
notice thereof was duly mailed by the City Clerk to each property
owner shown on the roll; and
II
WHEREAS, the Council held such hearing and upon due
consideration of all evidence before it finds that the lots,
tracts, parcels of land and other properties within LID 330 are
specially benefited by the improvements in at least the amount
charged against the same; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The assessments and assessment roll of Local ,
Improvement District No. 330 which has been created and
established for the purposes of constructing and installing
I
streets, sanitary sewer and water main improvements on 64th Avenue
South from South Smith Street to South 228th street and from South%
216th Street to South 212th Street within the city be and the samd
is hereby in all things and respects approved and confirmed in thl�
total amount of $4,869,549.16.
Section 2. Findings.
2.1 Each of the lots, tracts, parcels of land, and
other properties shown upon the roll is hereby determined and
declared to be specifically benefited by the improvements in at
least the amount charged against the same, and the assessment
appearing against the same is in proportion to the several
assessments appearing on the roll. There is hereby levied and
assessed against each lot, tract, parcel of land, and other
property appearing on the roll the amount finally charged against:
the same thereon.
Section 3. The assessment roll as approved and confirmed
shall be filed with the Supervisor of Treasury Services of the
city of Kent for collection, and the Supervisor of Treasury
Services is hereby authorized and directed to publish notice as
required by law stating that the roll is in her hands for
collection and payment of any assessment thereof or any portion o
that assessment can be made at any time within thirty days from
the date of the first publication of the notice without penalty,
interest or cost, and that thereafter the sum remaining unpaid
shall be paid in fifteen (15) equal installments with interest ati
an estimated rate of nine (9) percent per annum with the exact
interest rate to be fixed in the ordinance authorizing issuance
and sale of the LID bonds for LID 330. The first installments of
assessments on the assessment roll shall become due and payable
during the 30 days succeeding the date one year after the date of
the first publication by the Supervisor of Treasury Services of
notice that the assessment roll is in her hands for collection and
annually thereafter each succeeding installment shall become due
and payable in like manner. If the whole or any portion of the
assessment remains unpaid after the first 30 days period, interest
upon the whole unpaid sum shall be charged at the rate as
determined above, and each year thereafter one of the installments
together with interest due on the whole unpaid balance, shall be
collected. Any installment not paid prior to the expiration of
2 -
i
the 30 day period during which some installment is due and payable
shall thereupon become delinquent. All delinquent installments
shall be subject to a charge of interest at the rate as determined
above and for an additional charge of nine (9) percent penalty
levied upon both principal and interest due upon such installment
or installments. The collection of such delinquent installments
will be enforced in the manner provided by law.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage,
approval and publication as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY
I
I
I
PASSED the day of 1990.
( APPROVED the day of _ 1990.
I
PUBLISHED the day of 1990.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance)
No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon
indicated.
(SEAL)
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
8470-300
I
3 -
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . city Council Action:
Councilmember - moves, Councilmember
seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through J be approved.
Discussion
Action
r�
`-` 3A. Approval of Minutes.
` tU Approval of the minutes of the Council meeting of May 1, 1990.
3B. Approval of Bills .
Approval of payment of the bills received through May 21, 1990
after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at
4 : 30 p.m. on May 22 , 1990 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
Date Check Numbers Amount
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/4/90 134975 - 135666 $882, 654.20
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
CONSENT CALENDAR
3 . City Council Action:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember
seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through J. be approved.
Discussion
Action
3A. Approval of Minutes.
Approval of the minutes of the Council meeting of May 1, 1990.
3B.,,-Approval of Bills.
Approval of payment of the bills received through May 21, 1990
after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at
4 : 30 p.m. on May 22 , 1990 .
Approval of checks issued for vouchers:
'} Date / Check
Numbers' Amount
l 1
Approval of checks issued for payroll:
Date Check Numbers Amount
5/4/90 134975 - 135666 $882, 654.20
} i
i-
Council Agenda
Item No. 3 A-B
K Kent City Council Meeting
Date May15, 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL COURT FEASIBILITY STUDY: - f�3dN�E$IT;
,A-C'BfiEMENT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adopt the Interlocal Agreement between
the Cities of Kent and Auburn for a study of the feasibility of
establishing a municipal court. This study will be done in
conjunction with the City of Auburn, but will specifically
address the feasibility for each individual City. The maximum
amount of the contract will be $8 , 000 to be split equally by the
Cities. The report will be due to each City by July 16, 1990.
3 . EXHIBITS: Interlocal Agreement
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $4 , 000 maximum
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Law Department 1990 Budget
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember _ seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3C
1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION
2 OF A MUNICIPAL COURT FEASIBILITY STUDY
3
4 THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the
5 CITY OF KENT, a municipal corporation of the State of
6 Washington, located at 220 4th Ave. So. , Kent, WA 98032-5895,
7 hereafter referred to as "Kent" , and the CITY OF AUBURN, a
8 municipal corporation of the State of Washington, located at
9 25 W. Main, Auburn, WA 98001, hereafter referred to as Auburn,
10 and Ms. SUE E. FREEBORN, Attorney at Law, and the law firm of
11 CROMWELL, MENDOZA, & BELUR, a Professional Service Organization
12 under Washington laws, located at Suite 100, 6450 Southcenter
13 Boulevard, Seattle, Washington 98188-2588, hereafter referred
14 to as "Consultant" .
15 WHEREAS, the cities of Kent and Auburn issued a Request
16 for Proposals for preparation of a Municipal Court Feasibility
17 Study; and
18 WHEREAS, the Consultant has submitted a, proposal which
19 the cities accept by the terms of the Agreement;
20 NOW, THEREFORE, in accordence with the Interlocal
21 Cooperation Act, Chapter 39 . 34 RCW, and in consideration of
22 the conditions herein, the parties agree as follows:
, 23
24
25
26
------------------------------
Agreement - Municipal Court
Feasibility Study (A-MC)
April , 1990
i
2 1. ACCEPTANCE.
3 The Cities of Kent and Auburn hereby accept the proposal
4 ' from the Consultant dated March 29, 1990, which is attached as
5 Exhibit A and incorporated by reference in this agreement.
6 The Consultant agrees to prepare a Municipal Court Feasibility
7 Study which will analyse the feasibility for each city to
8 establish a separate municipal court.
9 2 . CONSULTANT'S SERVICES.
10 The Municipal Court Feasibility Study will provide the
11 following information to each city:
12 2 . 1. Evaluate space requirements, staffing,
computerization, and activity levels and projected
13 cost effectiveness of a municipal court, with a
direct comparison of these items to the current use
14 of Aukeen District Court.
15 2 . 2 • Assess the impact of formation of a municipal court
on other users of the criminal justice system: the
16 public, prosecutor, public defenders, probation,
defense attorneys and police and jail operation.
17 2 . 3 . Comparison of the special requirements, staffing and
activity levels, costs and cost effectiveness of
18 municipal courts in comparable cities, to Kent's and
19 Auburn's activities in Aukeen District Court.
20 2 .4 . Comparison of calendars and procedures in Aukeen
District Court and in comparable municipal courts
21 and the relative impact on costs, including time
spent, by the cities of Auburn and Kent.
22
Each City agrees to fully cooperate with the Consultant in
`23
providing data and information necessary to prepare the study.
24
25
26
------------------------------
Agreement - Municipal Court
Feasibility Study (A-MC)
Anril . 1990
1
2 3 . TIME FOR COMPLETION.
3 The Consultant agrees to complete l he Municipal Court
4 Feasibility Study by 5 : 00 p. m. on Ju , 1990. The study
5 shall be submitted to the City Attorney of each City.
6 4 . COMPENSATION.
The Consultant shall be paid at the rate of $100. 00/ per
8 hour for preparation of the study PROVIDED THAT, the
9 Consultant agrees that the maximum total cost to the Cities
10 for completion of the study shall not exceed $8, 000. The
11 compensation herein shall constitute full payment for all
12 services rendered by the Consultant and for all materials,
13 supplies, equipment and incidentals necessary to complete the
14 study. The Consultant shall submit a billing itemizing hours
15 worked and tasks performed. The bill shall be submitted to:
16 City Attorney
City of Auburn
17 25 W. Main
Auburn, WA 98001
18 Auburn shall issue written notice to the City' of Kent
19
evidencing payment of compensation to the Consultant. Kent
20
agrees to reimburse Auburn for one-half of compensation paid,
21
within 30 days of receipt of the notice from Auburn.
22
,23
24
25
26
Agreement - Municipal Court
Feasibility Study (A-MC)
April , 1990
1
2 5. OWNERSHIP.
3 All data or other material produced by the Consultant,
4 including the final study, shall be deemed the property of the
5 cities of Kent and Auburn and shall be delivered to each City
6 upon its request.
7 6 . ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
8 This Agreement together with the attachment, constitutes
9 the entire Agreement between the parties. This Agreement may
10 be amended only by written instrument signed by all of the
11 parties.
12 7 . INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
13 The parties intend that an independent contractor
14 relationship will be created by this agreement and no agent,
15 employee or representative of the Consultant shall be deemed
16 to be an agent, employee or representative of the City for any
17 purpose.
18 8 . FILING OF AGREEMENT.
19 A copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the City
20 Clerk of the CITY OF AUBURN, the City Clerk of the CITY OF
21 KENT, the Consultant, the King County Records Division and the
22 Secretary of State pursuant to the requirements of RCW
123 39. 34 . 040 .
24
25
26
------------------------------
Agreement - Municipal Court
Feasibility Study (A-MC)
April , 1990
1
CITY OF AUBURN
2
3
4
5 M A Y O R
6
DATE:
7
8
9 ATTEST:
10
11
12 ROBIN WOHLHUETER, City Clerk
13
14
15 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
16
17
18 MARGUERITE SCHELLENTRAGER,
City Attorney
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
------------------------------
Agreement - Municipal Court
Feasibility Study (A-MC)
April , 1990
r
1 CITY OF RENT
2
' 3
4 M A Y O R
5
6
DATE:
7
8
9
10 ATTEST:
11
12
13 City Clerk
14
15 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
16
17
18
19 City Attorney
20
21 DATED•
22
23
24
25
26
------------------------------
Agreement - Municipal Court
Feasibility Study (A-MC)
April , 1990
1 CONSULTANT
CROMWELL, MENDOZA i BELUR, P. S.
2
3
4
.5 By. SUE E. FREEBORN
6
7
Title:
8
9
10
Date•
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
,23
24
25
26
------------------------------
Agreement - Municipal Court
Feasibility Study (A-KC)
April , 1990
CROMWELL, MENDOZA g BELUR, P. S.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
YJIrE 100
6450 SOUTHCENTER BOULEVARD
EREDMR MEN1>0ZA SEATTLE,Wn5HINGTON 98188-2588 (206) 246-3500
CRECCorr E.CRAMWELL
JEMYJ BEWR TELECOPIER:t2061248-0933
LAUR/. CFNE MIDDAUCH
SUE E.FREEBORN
March 29F 1990
`�Y L::::::�tilfl-�I:�ntlJ�llcj$U1�ICc
Ms . Marguerite Schellentrager
Auburn City Attorney Ir II 1!7 D
25 West Main
Auburn, WA 98001 MAC 1990
Re : Municipal Court Feasibility Proposal
Dear Ms . Schellentrager :
I am writing to you in response to your recent request for a
proposal on your municipal court feasibility study. Pursuant to
this request, I have outlined below my firm' s proposal along with
a brief description of my qualifications .
I propose to conduct the feasibility study in question on an
hourly basis with a ceiling on that hourly amount. I would charge
$100 . 00 an hour which is less than my normal billing rate. I
anticipate that the study will take between 50 to 80 hours to
prepare. You will be charged no more than 80 hours for this study.
The proposed study will cover all the requested information
outlined in your "Request for Proposal Municipal Court Feasibility
Study. " Any additional services would be subject to renegotiation.
It is my understanding that you desire a feasibility study
which addresses the formation of two separate municipal courts
Therefore the proposed study will evaluate the cost and benefits
for each city individually.
My qualifications for conducting this feasibility study are
as follows : My background includes 1. 5 of prosecutorial work for
the City of Bellevue . I then became a municipal attorney for the
Odgen, Murphy & Wallace law firm. My duties there included
Municipal and District Court Prosecution for multiple Puget Sound
cities, as well as ordinance drafting of municipal criminal codes.
Finally, I have been an associate with my present firm for four
years . I essentially have a general practice. However, the emphasis
of my practice is criminal misdemeanor work . Finally, I am a pro
tern judge for the Federal Way Court and I have served in that
capacity for five years .
As a result of my criminal practice in the south end, I have
spent a fair amount of time in Aukeen District Court and am aware
of 'she difficulties encountered by Kent and Auburn in the efficient
adm nistration of their prosecutorial duties.
EXHIBIT -
My best qualification for this project is that I am
experienced in conducting and .preparing the type of feasibility
study to draft this feasibility study you require, having done so
for the City of Edmonds in 1985 . I also drafted the ordinance which
allowed its removal from South District Court .
I offer the following attorneys and judges as references for
my qualifications and experience:
Ms . Susan Irwin
Bellevue City Prosecutor
( 206) 455-6822
Ms. Rosemary Bordlemay
Ogden, Murphy & Wallace
( 206) 447-7000
Judge Gary Utigard
Southwest District Court
( 206) 296-0144
I have tried several cases and negotiated numerous others with
the prosecutor for the City of Kent, Jill Vanneman. She is
familiar with my capabilities and legal skills.
As a final aside, I recently spoke with the municipal judge
for the City of Edmonds, who also is the municipal judge for the
newly formed Lynnwood Municipal Court. He confirmed that the
formation of the Edmonds Municipal Court was far more successful
and efficient than anyone expected. I would look appreciate the
opportunity and interesting challenge of aiding your cities in the
same process .
Please feel free to contact me if you have any further
questions or concerns. Thank you for considering me for this
project . I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
CROMWELL, MENDOZA & BEL , P. S.
Sue E. Freeborn
SEF/me
O
Kent City Council Meeting
�✓ Date May 15. 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: HOUSING OPPORTUNITY FUND GRANT APPLICATION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize application for King County
Housing Opportunity Fund (HOF) money to further the 92 unit Kent
Senior Housing Bond Project. If awarded, the grant money will
enable the City to build additional senior housing units for the
frail elderly. Kent City Council authorization of the
application needs to be forwarded to King County to be
considered as part of the application review.
3 . EXHIBITS: staff memo
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee Planning Department
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS: _.
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3D
3�
KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT
May 7 , 1990
TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: LIN BALL, SENIOR PLANNER
SUBJECT: SENIOR HOUSING BOND: KING COUNTY HOUSING
OPPORTUNITY FUND GRANT APPLICATION.
Background
The Planning Department is in the process of applying for $750, 000
in grant monies from King County' s Housing Opportunity Fund (HOF)
to further the Kent Senior Housing Program. If awarded this money,
the City will be able to build additional senior housing units and
provide congregate care services for frail seniors in its 92-unit
Senior Housing Project.
King County requires Council authorization of the City' s
application in the form of meeting minutes which will be considered
as part of the application review.
This item will go before the Planning Committee on May 15th and
will appear on the Council Consent Calendar that same evening. It
is anticipated that the Planning Committee will recommend Council
authorization of this grant application. If their recommendation
differs, they will report to the full City Council on May 15th.
The City Council needs to take the following action:
1. Authorize HOF Grant Application
The Planning Department is asking for your authorization of
the HOF grant application. Council authorization needs to be
forwarded to King County.
If the City of Kent is awarded the grant money, the Planning
Department will come back to the Council at that time for
acceptance of the grant money.
JS:LB: ca
,1 . Kent City Council Meeting
Date May 15. 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: WALNUT GROVE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION NO. SU-90-2
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorize June 5 for a public meeting to
consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional
approval of an application by Kerr-Built, Inc. for a 22 lot
single family residential preliminary subdivision. The property
is approximately 6. 1 acres in size and is located east of 94th
Ave. S. , west of 96th Ave. S. , south of S. 241st St. , and north
of S. 243rd St.
1
3 . EXHIBITS• N�ne
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:\Hearing Examiner Ma�2 1990, conditional
approval
(Committee, St�ff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
1
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL P ONNEL IMPACT: NO__X_ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOT : Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $\
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 3E
X Kent City Council Meeting
�� Date May 15 . 1990
Category Consent Calendar
Ifr"l
1. SUBJECT: CYPRESS INN �10M,4*/AIR�
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of the bill of sale and
warranty agreement supplied by Charles B. Harris for continuous
operation and maintenance of approximately 275 feet of water
line, 325 feet of sanitary sewer, 195 feet of curb, gutter and
sidewalk, 270 feet of asphalt concrete and 28 feet of storm
sewer constructed in the vicinity of 84th Avenue South and South
222nd Street for the Cypress Inn at Kent project, and release of
cash bond after expiration of the one year maintenance period.
3 . EXHIBITS: vicinity map
N
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PERSONNE ' IMPACT: NO \ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Re mmended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: '
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
-
Council Agenda
Item No. 3F
208TH ST I � S 2081 h
12
Il
L
OBRIEN ELEM ENTAFt J
SCHOOL S 212TH ST
O'BRIEN _ \
c
y W
J
Q
1
> i
V 1 F
N W \
> r SO �1� f�TH ST_S,2164h. ST. Wg N
� l g 218TH
ST —
1
��\ NIiUST F.IAL >
y � I ' � � AREA I —'•
O^ S. 220TH ST.
r I r—� ' O
W J
}
J e P
Fro e. Suti Station1 1
222NU /
40 1 S / I
12
4 13 ? 13 18
NORT
y S 227TH PL H
KEN
INTC G I
a °' x
N H
Z cooJ. 228 � ST
- -
N
� g 228TH ST 5
4 x y
4
\ m W
a a
INDUSTRIAL AREA Z T TEMP. f
t- y
l m I
0 NOVAK L H
W 167 I
z dK
> N I
S. 234TH a 2
m I
F ST
O \ W W W
T COTE 57 � ♦r.h r.�7:; ! SOk P�'yd"
mo
• O O F 9.237T
at z y Fes'
CLOUDY ST
w W CLOU iY ST
8TH S < 5238
Y CYPRESS INN z ZS2,
14 13zs'z ,o
L
ti Kent City Council Meeting
7-7 Date May 15. 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: BANKING SERVICES CONTRACT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to accept the proposal and
to enter into contractual agreement for banking services with
U.S. Bank of Washington. The agreement will be for a three year
contract with an option to extend. U.S. Bank was one of four
banks who submitted proposals and theirs offered the lowest
monthly cost to the City. The cost proposed was $2 , 377.40 per
month based on specified volumes. This amount was approximately
$470 per month less than current charges. A contract between
the City and U.S. Bank will be reviewed by the City Attorney
prior to obtaining the Mayor's signature.
3 . EXHIBITS: U.S . Bank proposal ; baA proposal evaluation
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Finance Department; IBC; Operations Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner,/ Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEb IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $2 , 377.40 per month
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Finance Department Operating Budget
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3G
TO: Operations Committee Members
FROM: Tony McCarthy, Finance Director
DATE: May 3 , 1990
SUBJECT: Bank Proposal Evaluation
The city recently submitted requests for proposal for the city's banking
business which has been with U.S. Bank since 1984 . The city received 4
proposal responses from Seafirst Bank, U.S. Bank, Security Pacific Bank and
Puget Sound Bank.
The proposals were structured into 3 sections:
1. Monthly services required (fees paid monthly)
2 . Other services required (fees paid annually or other)
3 . Services available but don't currently use or need.
The evaluation consisted of the following:
1. Monthly cost analysis of required services, based on the city's current
volume.
U.S. Bank $2 , 377 . 40
Puget Sound 2 , 507 . 70
Seafirst 2 , 518. 40
Security Pacific 3 , 308. 92
2 . A hypothetical monthly cost analysis offset by earning on a monthly
balance of $300, 000 and uncollected funds usage of $10, 000.
U.S. Bank $ 487 . 57
Puget Sound 615. 20
Seafirst 646. 73
Security Pacific 1, 395. 38
3 . Annual cost analysis assuming items in 1 and 2 above, fees from other
services and initial set up fees.
U.S. Bank $ 6, 511. 80
Seafirst 8 , 867. 80
Puget Sound 9 , 762 .40
Security Pacific 18 , 944 . 54
In all evaluations performed U.S. Bank of Washington provided the required
services at the lowest cost to the city, showing an annual savings of about
$2 , 356 over the nearest competitor. The city's relationship with U.S. Bank
has grown over the years with the complexities of services provided. Another
advantage is that city will not have to spend extra time and expense
converting over to a new bank system. The request for proposal reduced our
current contract with U.S. Bank by $470. 72 per month due to automation and
the possibility of losing the city's banking business.
The recommendation is to maintain the city's current relationship with U.S.
Bank for a 3 year contract.
08
6
O
ar
N K
X w
O�W
♦G-N
tYJO2
p K K
J V�-
m
u?� N
= OV
syt<.! i uO
`laz •
J W F=
Sp0 i� S" od
W z r 0 0 u w Y
LL U W a 6 U S
O Y r V O N O
zYz �i= rc 2w
- UZONPJ
pu onaommz 11 w°O
O Y Y K 2 N N F <
W O a<£ O S P V U
J
6'�r.zU 6'1-OO N
N Y?
<O K<r m W 6 W F
00.-3-a'Y0
NpS Zrcf-O S
70W0]N«mw ..
W
Y NI- <KYz
aNNu-soJ� a'I `o
XYr 2u m-.n I
r r O O O O N O O O O O O O O O U r !II O0 O I`
O.O•DOP000000000\ i 11 0 O
8 r NII�r�OM¢m�V�1�000��}} } r D� II OVr m
0-0
�t`MNm^1�•ONN•ONMtO= � ��I YM1M d x
r N 1 �Nm
i N II F 6
W r ^ r II =
Jr i 11 Np
ZW H\\W N P N Y W\r
Y£xzYw
.z r
Iyh���NV10 fNVNO r n 11 �OKQ16 � p0 j.3-_
N Z r d N 0 a Z l F
O N n W
Y 1 2 x N x d Z
N OOONOOOOOOOOOOV � OOJ}rON Y��'N\WI---WW\\•
U O.00tO00000000NOi� P it OQ< O Z=2iLL � 0 £ •ZYNNYYZZ '
y<j •p MM•OnON OiNPNn r o III b06'26'nMn V 2 _
I�M�•O��PN�NNM � IMII VNKW_W_ < ' O O.r N.N
u tea : ii wn LL w na
o po : w w
o �
2= O O O O 0.0 O O V O O O V U : O II O O J U-m Nw N U U V V U • ��S..W W\Q w 2 Z 11
-6 00.00mO000=000Z\I �t 11 OO�zrWl"O Z2Z2� � ZZ£22Y�-2NY�= �
ZWNQIO MPIh 00 VMM rr �p YnYN - -
< �NM�n•-�•Ory •O N r ^II Wn < < p p• Z
m �y O N I M Ili N M W O O 3 3 r
Ll
-
w m3 i o u
Y N O • ' Q Q Y Y I
� 11
O
it Z Z
u x
U Wx O x
II � wNzw\NaN8Y�Y �
O O O O O O O O O O O O O<U r O II O O J -m N V....
' W ` W r r V✓<Im� l
o mo oo.•a00000poo\i� vli 000zao"°zzz\LLB oY\z za.! u wz :
_ Wzzzr
K Y ^ d n N N O r
m r 11 O U W ~
wa a o rc p�
N 1 Z Nr N- a p0 :
m a w Jo '
o 0 3
u M Or
i r]
N ^ Y Y UIN <i w
r i
J 2 6 r p 2 N O^ C
w u
r az w
u o z� p 3 wYa i�ul z i
Im -
.<iN
r •+U < O J w K N U Q_N W ' W Z W W K04
1 N
Y p 2 U 6 W
W U W {j
d w ^N<K N 4 Y
O :
O 4 W W N S O U Z ~ F Z S 6 W V Z O Z V a 2 U
S JYF'^UW < WKU O J\ NFJO[ N . XKY6W�W WIKUJKI
O W u<N.0.
' r yYUj 6 r Z W W W �_•J_p W J m m J <O 6 O=w Z . F r U w V 3 U O W K
ON WI-u.�rN U^m 3 6•wN p[ - -2 W20N2 Q
W u U O -N 2 a r 6 �-Y O w N U N r O V<U<N O[ w d U
u po'i� aw ru6�WOWo woo
o<<wwWwXi�� s hx z�6-LLN<r-oc lw Nr- i ' �zYo ag
K) W m
£ .~••< U r m N O W
O YlJ U J W < uY w 2 w W F w Y w S LL K U U O N p p LL S J 3 a a
Z . IpWWUI-'OL OW4W O 1-O S'O WY6wppDU p4iNWO<<N4•-NW<4
p U U O O c Q <V
C 6
z z ' L N rn s Tt Z U-to U D
m ' n>>O . - r 'm m 0 -103 z
-i r �r A-I T C-i Tti ' ms Z C
D Z D O N D N D '
3 3 ; O Z r m r ' A m ' ➢
O O 1 z n z ' x z z
Z M . m M S - m <C ➢ m➢K - n
=y 1 C N O ' '-I D 2 m Z ' O
S ' Z O Z m Z W I N
< < O T z D .-T D .. CD= . 1
I r tOt r r tim r Ntir]C i z
m n ' m 0 0 a 2 I C➢T Z ' ➢
m9 -ni�r�n i I-v m ' Mxmm r
v - N m <
C M 0 o�3 ' s mm C=mINm I N
m p>m I
' C W m l
1 ON O m i w W m
m In n N n I m\ w
' C O m A -� O m N m
' ➢O n 0 D N D m
I n Z.O C ' Z A A
I m r•„
n IT, \S
' OC mm
T A n v N m x
A-1 Av
y m m N m
O ti 0 s
on
m
n u
II II
II 11
11 II
11
11 II N
u °II II i a
II It >m T
It it
II I z^
It N II C, Nam ' �O I nN
.� .� 11 P PN co ~
W VI W it ti O V ' (D•O O
• Z•
� Wo
II !b OO ' \OODJ
ro ° o oo ' n000
n
it ili
n u
II -�
u
n O
u C
II II I Ow
T n
it u w m
u z
II l J ii II
j P
p�to rp
P N D 14 V
u V m m z
II V �O � VPI to V II � W 10
II ZZ. ➢....
ii u, m ' -•o a� II m oW ' \\ow rz
Il v W J p p u o 0 0 ' n n o o Cm
u II D
ti m
m
II m o A
u n z<
m C
m
II II K
' a O
li d I VI� O II •O �to A PSI =n
u r P O ' A V O ' ➢T 0
II VI W ' IJJ� 17J II r N V ' O N W V ^ ➢
r
II in vlo � o000 n N
II O
II 11
II 11
11 II
II
11 II Q
O
u ri m
n ii n
I I 11 N W
II O V j r ' P N Vt O I Z
OP •O ' PV�I O II WN W ' OAO`o O
11 VI N 1 NVI V II !pr 01" OONN
II Oi� OCt ' 0002�
II N to ' VIO V II 00 00 ' 0000
II O O ' 0 0 O II
II �
II
n � n
c
' A
W I W I A
i I r Z
n
:J 1 zz.n� r 0
S� � nnOr I A
D
n
H
CITY OF KENT
BANKING SERVICES
PROPOSAL Page 1 of 4
City of Kent
220 Fourth Avenue South
Kent, Washington 98032
Dear City of Kent
The undersigned, a banking institution maintaining branch offices within the city limits of Kent, Washington, submits
the following proposal for the City's Demand Deposit Bank Account for a three-year period, with an option to extend,
beginning July 1, 1990 as per specifications and exhibits attached. The following identifies which services our bank
can provide and their costs based on estimated volumes.
SERVICES PROVIDED CHARGES
1 - BANKING SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED (YES OR NO) (AMOUNT & HOW OFTEN)
--------------------
----------------------------------------------
-----------------
General Banking Services Required:
A. Main Demand Deposit Checking Account YES see attached
B. Additional Checking Account. YES see attached
C. Separate and combined monthly account analysis. YES none
D. "On-Line" Bank Account Access.
1. Daily Account Balance Reporting. _ YES see attached
2. Automated Stop Payment System. _ YES see attached
3. Automated Wire Transfer System. YES see attached
Specialized Banking Services Required:
E. Lockbox Services YES see attached
F. Merchant Credit Card Services. YES see attached
G. Credit Cards for Employee Use. YES see attached
H. Daily Courier service. YES see attached
I. Overdraft Line of Credit. YES see page 3 #4
J. Coin & Currency furnished. YES see attached
K. Depository Bags. YES see attached
L. Deposit Slips. - Standard Print/Style YES none
M. ACH Direct Deposits/Automatic Debits. YES none
Incoming transactions
Available Banking Services, as Needed:
N. Safe Deposit Box Facilities. YES none
0. Escrow Agent Services. YES none
P. Additional Checking accounts. YES see attached schedule
Q. Cashier Checks and Traveler Checks. ___ YES none
R. Additional Copies of Statement for auditor. YES none _
Investment Services:
S. Safekeeping Services for Investments Purchased through your bank. YES none*
T. Purchase Federal Reserve "SLUG" investments. YES none
Services Considering for Implementation:
U. Safekeeping Services for Investment From Outside Institutions. YES
V. ACH - Direct Deposit Payroll. YES .08 per item**
W. Telecomnunicate Utility Payments and Reconciliation. YES none
X. Employee Membership Services. YES none**
Services City Currently Contracts Through Outside Vendors:
Y. Account Payable and Payroll Check Printing. YES
Z. Armored Car Service. YES
* See attachment 1
** Refer to additional material enclosed - items I (ACH) & E (membership accounts)
2 - CHARGES FOR SERVICES REQUIRED
Page 2 of 4
---------------------------------
Projected Estimated Monthly
SERVICES Monthly Volume Proposed Rate Services Charges
A-B: BASIC ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE 2 ACCOUNTS $ 6.00 $ 12.00
DEBITS - CHECKS POSTED 2,280 .10 228.00
CREDITS - DEPOSITS POSTED 180 .17 30.60
ITEMS DEPOSITED 11,400 .045 513.00
ACCOUNT RECONCILIATION 2,280 .035 79.80
Includes telecommunication output
RETURNED ITEMS 12 1.25 15.00
WIRE TRANSFERS - IN 11 7.00 77.00
D: ON-LINE ACCOUNT BALANCE INQUIRY** 1 60.00 60.00
PER ITEMS LISTED/DEBITS & CREDITS** 100 .20 20.00
AUTOMATED STOP PAYMENTS** 2 .00 .00
AUTOMATED WIRE TRANSFERS - OUT** 8 8.00 64.00
E: LOCKBOX - UTILITY (MONTHLY)*** 8,100 .13 1,053.00
BUSINESS LICENSE (ANNUALLY)*** 2,200 .13 286.00
***Optical scannable documents with
telecommunication output
F: MERCHANT CREDIT CARD SERVICES (DISCOUNT)** $15,000 1.5% 225.00
Electronic data capture system
G: CREDIT CARDS FOR EMPLOYEE USE (ANNUALLY) 15 cards 25.00/year 375.00
H: DAILY COURIER SERVICE 5 days/week .00 .00
.60/$1000
J: COIN AND CURRENCY FURNISHED .06/coin roll N/A
K: DEPOSITORY BAGS 47 Locked bags * .00 .00
ESTIMATED MONTHLY SERVICE CHARGE (NOT INCLUDING*) $----2_377_40---------
PROJECTED VOLUME NOT MONTHLY; LOCKBOX BUSINESS LICENSE AND CREDIT CARDS ARE ANNUAL, DEPOSITORY BAGS ARE INITIAL COST.
**Refer to additional materials enclosed - items D (Automated Services) & J (Merchant Services)
Page 3 of 4
3 - CREDIT FOR ACCOUNT BALANCES
---------------------------
Describe the formula proposed to calculate the earnings credit for collected fund balances. Describe how your bank would
compensate the city if the earnings credit exceed the bank service charges. Formula should identify an interest rate
that can be verified in the Wall Street Journal.
U.S. Bank calculates earnings credit at a rate equal to the monthly average of the 91-day Treasury Bill. This rate is
calculated by averaging the actual results of the Treasury Bill auctions occurring during the month. Should the earnings
credit in any given month exceed the total service charges, the excess credit would be applied toward services provided
the following month.
100 % of the monthly
average of the 91-day
Treasury Bill.
4 - OVERDRAFT LINE OF CREDIT
------------------------
Describe the mechanism and fee for handling possible overdraft situations.
U.S. Bank will provide an overdraft line of credit for the occasional occurrence of ledger overdrafts at no charge,
unless the combined balances in all analysised accounts is negative on any given day. Should this situation occur the
assessed fee will be based on a rate equal to the earnings credit rate which is the monthly average of the 91-day
Treasury Bill.
5 - DESCRIBE PROPOSED LOCK BOX OPERATION
------------------------------------
Recent equipment enhancements allows U.S. Bank to offer a fully automated, intelligent document processing system, that
not only significantly increases the speed and reliability of our daily processing routine, it offers more flexible
processing options and electronic interfaces for our customers. We look forward to being able to review this system with
you and enhance your current lock box service to incorporate data transmission and other available options.
6 DESSCRIBE ENHANCED MERCHANT CREDIT CARD SERVICES
-----------------------------------------------
By utilizing an electronic data capture system you realize the benefit of a significantly lower discount rate as well as
a long list of other related advantages. For more specific details please refer to additional material - item J enclosed.
7 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR DEVIATIONS FROM PROPOSAL SPECIFICATIONS
-------------------------------------------------------------
After careful, detailed review of the outlined specifications, and based on dealings we have had with the City in the
past, we do not anticipate any special conditions or deviations from our proposal. However, should the City see a need
to make any changes or enhancements we are always ready to work with you in any way possible.
8 - OTHER FEES AND CREDITS PROPOSED, INCLUDING ANY CONVERSION-START UP COSTS
There are no other fees or credits anticipated. Since we are the current service provider there are no conversion-start
up casts.
Page 4 of 4
9 - ADDITIONAL MATERIAL REQUESTED
Please include the following additional documents to assist the City in its evaluation of the proposals:
A. Bank availability schedule.
xx Name Phone Number
B. Banking contacts.
d 461-3949har
Government banking contact Sharon Ric 461-3947
Bob Farquhar
Branch bank contact.
Christine King 344-3760
Investment contact.
Phil Sluiter 340-8049
C. Sample monthly account analysis.
D. Information on on-line balance reporting, automated wire transfers and stop payments, if available.
xx
E. City employee membership account privileges.
xx
F. Listing of other public entities your bank does business with.
xx
G. Most recent statement of bank's financial condition.
H. Copy of latest Public Depository Liability Report as submitted to the Public Deposit Protection Commission.
xx
I. Electronic Funds Transfer System.**
Direct deposit payroll
Preauthorized payments
J. Merchant credit card information and samples.
xx
K. ATM - Cash machine information.
xx
L. US Bancorp annual report.
xx
The undersigned certifies that the completion of this Proposal Sheet is a binding commitment to provide the banking services
requested as proposed herein.
Bank Name: U.S. Bank))of Washington National Association
Bank Address: 1414 44ttKle. Seattle WA 9810 7
Authorized Signature:
/Sharon K. Richard, Assistant Vice Presi�ent
Date: April 16 1990 .
**Please refer to the additional material enclosed.
MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print.
-----------------------------------------
'Dackage. Dated: 05/10/90 at 1125.
zbject: GOLF CONCESSIONAIRE - FISCAL NOTE
Creator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Contents: 1.
Part 1.
THE CITY SOLICITED PROPOSALS FOR REPLACING THE PREVIOUS CONCESSIONAIRE AT
THE GOLF COMPLEX. SEVEN PROPOSALS WERE RECEIVED, INCLUDING ONE FROM THE
PARK DEPARTMENT. THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT PREPARED A FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF
ALL PROPOSALS TO INSURE MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTIONS TO PAY DEBT SERVICE TOTALLING
APPROXIMATELY $1, 000, 000 PER YEAR.
BASED ON THE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, THE IBC RECOMMENDS AWARDING THE CONCESSION
TO THE PARKS DEPARTMENT WITH CLOSE MONITERING OF THE $324 , 605 NET INCOME AS
PROPOSED. THIS PROPOSED NET INCOME IS $101, 410 MORE THAN CURRENTLY INCLUDED
IN THE BUDGET. THE RECOMMENDATION IS TO ADD A BUDGET CHANGE TO INCREASE THE
REVENUE AND EXPENDIITURES BUDGET TO THE LEVEL AS IDENTIFIED IN THE PARKS
DEPARTMENT PROPOSAL. THIS WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REVENUE FOR SALE OF
MERCHANDISE, LESSONS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE. THE ADDITIONAL REVENUE
WILL BE USED TO PURCHASE THE MERCHANDISE INVENTORY, PAY THE INTEREST ON ANY
DEFICIT CASH BALANCE, AND OTHER RELATED COSTS. NET INCOME CAN BE USED AS A
RESERVE FOR GOLF COMPLEX IMPROVEMENTS OR TO MAKE ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS TOWARD
THE GENERAL OBLIGATIONS DEBT SERVICE. CURRENTLY THE GOLF COMPLEX BUDGET
INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY $700 , 000 TO PAY TOWARD THE $1, 000, 000 ANNUAL DEBT
SERVICE.
T ADDITION THE IBC RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF A LINE-OF-CREDIT LOAN OF UP TO
y300, 000 TO COVER DEFICIT CASH BALANCES ON A MONTH-TO-MONTH BASIS . THE
DEFICIT IS PARTIALLY DUE TO THE GOLF COMPLEX PROJECT SHORTFALL OF APPROXIMATELY
$187, 000 . THE BALANCE OF THE LOAN IS TO PROVIDE MERCHANDISE FOR INVENTORY.
THE GOLF COMPLEX WILL BE CHARGED INTEREST ON THIS INTERFUND LOAN AT THE STATE
POOL RATE.
, CITY OF KENT 17-Apr-90
RIVERBEND GOLF ANALYSIS
PROPOSAL VS BUDGET
TOTAL 1990 BUDGET
PARKS BUDGET CHANGE
REVENUES
Sale Of Merchandise 270, 811 4 , 000 266 , 811
Lessons 100, 000 58 , 000 42 , 000
Mini Putt Fees 46, 000 41, 355 4 , 645
Driving Range Fees 366, 000 350 , 000 16, 000
Other: 0 0
Rental Of Golf Equipment 3 , 000 3 , 000 0
Sale of Salvage 3 , 000 31000
Sale of Used Balls 71000 71000 0
Rental of Facility 1.0 , 000 10, 000
0
TOTAL GROSS REVENUE 805 , 811 4631355 342 , 456
0
0
EXPENSES 0
Total Salaries & Benefits 187 , 859 159 , 944 27 , 915
0
Cost of Goods Sold 202 , 317 1, 000 201, 317
0
Interest on Inventory Loan 9 , 000 9 , 000
Range Balls 39 , 000 39 , 000 0
Telephone 21080 2; 080 0
Utilities 141700 14 , 700 0
Range Equipment 5 , 000 51000
Miscellaneous 21, 250 231436 (21186)
0 0
0 0
TOTAL EXPENSES 481, 206 240 , 160 241, 046
0
NET INCOME 324 , 605 223 , 195 101, 410
C CRAIG GOLF1
o
" Kent City Council Meeting
Date May 15, 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: CRIME PREVENTION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acknowledgement of the donation of
$165.00 from Mitzel's American Kitchens to the D.A.R.E. program.
3 . EXHIBITS: none
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO__I_� YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $
SOURCE OF FUNDS: $
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3I
a
ti,k't
Kent City Council Meeting
Date May 15, 1990
1 Category Consent Calendar
0"
1. SUBJECT: PROPOSED -ORDINANCE' REPEALING ORDINANCE _2-381*
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance tiw� repealing
Ordinance 2788.
At the initiation of the Housing Element Work Program, the City
Council adopted Ordinance 2788, which reduced multifamily
residential densities by 20 percent. The ordinance was intended
to be an interim measure to be in effect only until such time as
the Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Update was completed and
the accompanying zoning amendments were enacted.
The Housing Element Study has been completed and as a result the
City Council passed OrdinanceS2901, 2902, 2903 , 2904, and
Resolutions 1230 through 1237 . Those ordinances and resolutions
obviate the need for the interim measures enacted by
Ordinance 2788 .
3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Planning Committee
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO `\ YES___
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: N/A
SOURCE OF FUNDS: $
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 3J
i� 30
I
i
ORDINANCE NO-
AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent,
Washington, repealing Ordinance 2788 which
amended Kent City Code Chapters 15.04.040,
15.04.050 and 15,04.060 reducing multifamily
residential densities for lots of more than
15,000 square feet in size.
WHEREAS, the Kent City CounciL passed Ordinance 2788 on
July 5, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the provisions of Ordinance 2788 achieved a 20
percent reduction in multifamily residential densities and were
intended as an interim measure, to be in effect only until such
time as the Comprehensive Plan Housing Elements update was
completed and the accompanying zoning amendments were enacted; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has passed the Ordinances 2901I
2902, 2903, 2904 and Resolutions 1230 through 1237 as a result of
the Housing Element Work Program; which ordinances and resolutions
obviate the need for the interim measures enacted by
Ordinance 2788; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Repealer. Ordinance 2788, as codified in
Kent Municipal Code Sections 15.04.040, 15.04.050 and 15.04.060,
is hereby repealed.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in force thirty (30) days from the time of its final
passage as provided by law.
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY
I
PASSED the day of 1990.
APPROVED the day of 1990.
i PUBLISHED the day of 1990.
I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance)
No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent,
Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as
hereon indicated.
it
I
_ (SEAL)
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
I
i
� II
I
I
iI I
8450-300
I
2 -
Kent City Council Meeting
Date May 15, 1990
1. Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: KENT-KHERSON PEACE PARK
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The name of the Old City Hall Park is
being changed to Kent-Kherson Peace Park in honor of Kent's
Sister City. According to Resolution 1049, parks may be named
giving consideration to Sec. 3 . 3 Criteria: historical or
cultural significance. Sec. 4 .3 Procedure: allows for a six
month time lapse between receipt of a name proposal and the
final recommendation. Due to project timelines and volunteer
involvement in the building of the park, the Parks staff
recommends waiving the six month period and accepting
Kent-Kherson Peace Park as the official name of the park.
f �
3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution 1049 Y
l;
i
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: None
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember ^¢ " moved', Councilmember'' i.
to adopt Kent-Kherson Peace Park as the official name of the
park located at Second Ave. S. and W. Gowe St. , formerly Old
City Hall Park. �. � ��� �C_ c , c r£ _�, y; c ,:_r• _
yy
DISCUSSION:_
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4A
RESOLUTION NO. 1049
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington relating to parks and
public facilities; establishing policy and
procedure for the naming of City parks and
public facilities.
WHEREAS, the City of Kent does not have a policy and
procedure concerning the naming of parks and public facilities; and
WHEREAS, it is appropriate to outline the criteria and
process for official naming of park, recreation and other public
facilities ; NOW THEREFORE
.,THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 . The following policy and procedure is
established for the naming of parks and other public facilities.
PARK AND PUBLIC FACILITY NAMING POLICY
1 .0 PURPOSE: To outline the criteria and procedures for
the official naming of park, recreation and other public
facilities.
2.0 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS:
2.1 The naming of parks, recreation areas and other
public facilities should be approached with caution, patience and
deliberation.
2.2 A name once adopted should be bestowed with the
intention that it will be permanent, and changes should be
strongly resisted.
3.0 CRITERIA: Consideration in naming facilities shall
be given primarily to:
3.1 Neighborhood or geographical identification;
3 .2 A natural or geological feature (e.g. , Lake
Fenwick, Mill Creek);
3.3 Historical or cultural significance (e.g. , Van
Doren's Landing );
3.4 An individual who has donated substantial
monies or land or who was otherwise instrumental in the
acquisition of park acreage or public property (e.g. , Milwaukee
Playfield) .
3.4.1 Facilities shall not be named for living
persons; however, exceptions may be considered when A) a
significant contribution of land or money is made and the donor
stipulates naming of the facility as a condition of the donation,
or B) when an unusually outstanding public service would so
justify.
3.5 The wishes or preference of residents of
the neighborhood surrounding the public park, recreation area of
public facility.
4.0 PROCEDURE:
4.1 Suggestions for names shall be solicited from
organizations, individuals and the media, and all suggestions,
solicited or not, shall be acknowledged and recorded for
consideration by the City.
4.2 The legislative authority, following such
review and public hearings by the Parks Committee as deemed
appropriate, shall designate names for park, recreation and other
public facilities.
4.3 There shall be a time lapse of at least six
months between receipt of a name proposal and the final
recommendation on its adoption in cases where the person is living
or in which the death of the person or the event to be
commemorated took place within the past year.
4.4 Facilities shall be identified by the
established name, and signs shall be maintained as a source of
identity and civic pride.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent Washington this _,�? _ day of -- 198,S -
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this aZD
day of 2�Z�-er-- 198± �) y
R— IVWJ -�r J
VD,J Jvr(.J3 nit/
2 _
f .
Kent City Council Meeting
Date May 15, 1990
Category Consent Calendar
1. SUBJECT: GOLF COMPLEX MERCHANDISING BUDGET
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: C!/ At the May 1 Council meeting, the City
Council authorized the Parks Department to operate the golf
complex concessions from now through 1992 . In order to
implement this arrangement, a budget change authorizing the
expenditure of funds primarily to purchase golf merchandise
needs to be made. This budget change of $241,046 is offset by
$342 , 456 in additional revenues. In addition to the budget
change, a line of credit to cover deficit cash positions needs
to be authorized. The golf complex will experience deficit cash
positions due to overruns on land acquisition costs related to
building the golf complex and as start-up costs related to
acquiring merchandise for sale.
AUTHORIZATION of a budget change for the expenditurE
of funds primarily to purchase golf merchandis@
3 -jeg and AUTHORIZATION of a line of credit to cover Si
deficit cash positions. f
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: CitV CouWil
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL PE ONNEL IMPACT: NO YES X
FISCAL PERSONNEL NOT : Recommended 4,Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIR.VD: $241 046
SOURCE OF FUNDS: $'342 456 in additional golf revenue
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
-
Council Agenda
Item No. 3H
Kent City Council Meeting
X Date May 15 , 1990
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: METRO SEWERAGE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This item was discussed at the Public
Works Committee meeting on January 9 .
Metro is seeking a contract amendment essentially to implement a
change in the residenti L customer equivalency value which is
used as a basis for chaing non-residential customers. This
-.*change would increase Metro's bill to the City by $160, 000 per
year. The Public Works Department, while supporting the change,
recommends tabling any action thereon until a determination of
the City's financial exposure per the cleanup of the abandoned
sewage lagoon is known. Metro was the owner/operator of the
lagoon from 1967 to 1976 and as such, may have some
participating financial responsibility thereto. Therefore, any
and all negotiation points should be preserved.
3 . EXHIBITS: memorandum from Director of Public Works
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember � �,'" moves, Councilmember , _seconds
to withhold any action to the Metro Sewerage Disposal contract
and amendment at this time.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4B
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 15, 1990
TO: Public Works Comm ttee
FROM: Don Wickstromo
RE: METRO Contract Amendment
As the Public Works Committee was advised at their January 9th
meeting (minutes attached) Metro is seeking a contract amendment
in order to implement the recommendations of their Rate Structure
Advisory Committee which were:
1. A capacity charge on new customers and equivalents to help
offset the cost of providing wastewater conveyance and
treatment capacity for them;
2 . A change in the residential customer equivalency value used
to charge cities and districts for non-residential customers
from 900 cubic feet to 750 cubic feet;
3 . Establishment of a minimum level of annual expenditure for
infiltration/inflow control .
As noted the capacity charge will be $400 - .$500 and is to be
levied directly to the customer by Metro. Metro anticipates
collecting same over a period of years at $7. 00 per month. Our
only involvement therein will be to require and new applicant for
City sewer service to also fill out a Metro application.
Unlike the capacity charge, the change in the residential customer
equivalency will have a financial impact on the City and thus, on
our rate payers. Metro' s bill to City, independent of any rate
increase will increase by $160, 000 per year. Due to our customer
composition (75% commercial/industrial and 25% residential) . Also
because of same, our commercial/industrial customers will absorb
the entire increase. Not only will they absorb this increase but
also the associated redistribution of the City's portion of the
total sewer rate. It should be noted however, that the proposed
change of the residential customer equivalency is the result of
several Metro studies reflecting that sewerage flows generated from
single family residential customers average 750 cubic feet per
month versus the 900 cubic feet presently used. As such, at
present residential customers are and have been subsidizing the
commercial/industrial customers.
In addition to the equivalency change, Metro is also proposing a
rate increase for 91. Metro' s rate is proposed to increase to
$13 . 20 per 900 cubic foot. (Presently $11. 60 per 900 cubic foot)
If however, all of Metro' s contracting agencies execute this
contract amendment by June, then Metro could implement the
equivalency change and thus their proposed rate could be reduced
to $11.95 per 750 cubic foot.
The following table summarizes the affects of both the equivalency
change and Metro ' s anticipated rate increase. The table also
reflects the rate implications of not executing the Metro contract
amendment thereby foreclosing on Metro's ability to do so.
% CHANGE IN CITY
SEWERAGE RATE
City Customer Metro Rate Metro Rate Metro Rate
Class increase increase increase
No contract amend. Exec. Contract No contract
amend. amend.
No change in City Change in Metro Change only
rate structure rate structure City rate
structure
Residential +9 -2 -5
Commercial/ +9 +17 +14
Industrial
Also attached for your information is a table denoting the impacts
of Metro' s equivalency change in both surrounding and other
contracting jurisdictions.
Lastly, the recommendation for implementation of a minimum annual
expenditure for infiltration/inflow control has been dropped out
of the proposed contract amendment.
Sewerage district was not supportive thereof and because Metro
needs 100% of its contract agencies to be in agreement, it was
dropped. It was dropped only because it was seen as a possible
stumbling block per execution of the contract amendment by June.
It will be pursued as a separate amendment.
In keeping with the regional perspective the Public Works
Department supports the execution of the Metro contract amendment.
However, we feel that the execution thereof by June 1st is
unrealistic. Our position is partly based upon work load but more
importantly is related to the clean up associated with the City's
abandoned sewage lagoon site. Metro was an operator/owner of that
site from 1967 through 1976. As such, Metro could possibly have
some financial liability for its cleanup. At this point, the
City's legal responsibilities and financial exposure, if any, for
clean up is unknown. To date, we have only selected a consultant
and are in the midst of executing a contract. Until our liability
and financial exposure is known and a direction established, we
should keep all options open with Metro.
TABLE
Increase (decrease) in annual sewer charges to Metro resulting from change
in residential customer equivalency value from 900 cu.t. to 750 cu. ft.
Assumes 1991 sewer rate of $13 . 20 without RCE change and $11. 97 with RCE
change. Based on customers reported for 1989 .
Increase
City Without Change With Change (Decrease) o
Kent $ 3 , 779, 741 $ 3 , 922 , 090 $142 , 349 3 . 8
Renton 3 , 426, 350 3 , 510, 964 84 , 614 2 . 5
Tukwila 803 , 246 860f8O6 57 , 560 7 . 2
Auburn 3 , 091, 018 3 , 215, 956 124 , 938 4 . 0
Seattle 48, 947, 818 49, 414, 171 466, 353 1. 0
Redmond 21475, 475 2 , 486, 724 11, 249 . 5
Bellevue 6, 401, 419 6 , 352 , 422 (48, 997) ( . 8)
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
JANUARY 9 , 1990
PAGE 2
CIP for this project.
Metro Contract Modification
Wickstrom explained that at the last legislative session Metro was
authorized to assess a development charge for sewer connection
service. That was a key element to their implementing a series of
changes recommended by their Water Quality Committee. One
recommendation was to reduce the base of the flat rate charge from
900 cf to 750 cf. Another was Seattle would clean up its overflows
of the sanitary sewer system by spending $1, 000, 000/year thereon
if the suburban districts and cities would agree to a system
development charge. The system development charge is $400-500 per
equivalent residential connection. Metro is proposing to collect
said charge on a $7/month fee over a period of years. There is
also an infiltration/inflow yearly maintenance requirement. Each
agency would be required to spend 2 cents/inch diameter/foot of
sewer system/year for maintenance of their system. This would
equate to approximately $150, 000 year to Kent. If the agencies do
not spend this amount they would have to pay said sum to Metro.
Wickstrom stated the change from 900 cubic feet to 750 cubic feet
for residential equivalent would mean approximately a 10% reduction
to our residential customers but approximately a 15% increase to
our commercial accounts . Wickstrom stated this is informational
at this time but in the next few months we will be making a
recommendation whether to enter into the agreement.
272nd/277th Corridor
Wickstrom explained he had originally placed this on the agenda to
bring the Committee up to date. However, after discussion with the
City Attorney, it was determined since the Council will have to
rule on any possible appeal to the EIS, we should not present any
information at this time. It was mentioned that Council should not
attend the public meeting on January 24 either. Johnson asked if
he could ask about the timing of the project. Driscoll confirmed
that would be a legitimate question. In response, Wickstrom stated
we anticipate completion of the EIS in June, 1990 . Because we need
permits from King County and Auburn, that process could take six
months to complete. King County will have to adopt the EIS and
approve the alignment. After that, we can begin the design. Thus,
construction could start in the construction season of 1992 . White
asked if annexation would speed up the process. Wickstrom
explained it would simplify the permit process . White asked if
Wickstrom had developed any figures for a city-wide Go bond issue
for these transportation improvements . Wickstrom stated that with
lY
�9 3�" Kent City Council Meeting
��U A �U { {' Date May 15. 1990
Category Other Business
1
1. SUBJECT: LOCAL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN - RESOLUTION
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: In compliance with Mate law, local
governments are to prepare a Local Hazardous Waste Plan. The
February 1989 Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan for
Seattle-King County is a joint plan for King County and its
cities, including Kent.
3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from Director of Public Works to Public
Works Committee; copy of Resolution.
4 . RECOMMENDED BY:
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: _
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember " j� �""�'N moves, Councilmember seconds
to adopt Resolution ;> l'i�' approving the Local Hazardous Waste
Management Plan as amended and with specific contingencies, as
reflected in the Public Works Director's memorandum to the
Public Works Committee.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 4C
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MAY 15, 1990
TO: Public Works Comm ttee
FROM: Don Wickstr Director of Public Works
RE: Local Household Hazardous Waste Management Plan
The Issue
State law requires each local government to prepare a Local
Hazardous Waste Plan. The February 1989 Local Hazardous Waste
Management Plan for Seattle-King County is a joint plan for King
County and its cities including Kent. Said plan must be approved
by municipalities representing 75% of the population of the cities
which acted either for approval or disapproval. The deadline for
City Council action is June 1. Approval of this Plan requires a
resolution. This Plan will become incorporated by reference into
the King County Solid Waste Management Plan; Chapter I-5 and
Section I.B-1.
Purpose of Plan
This plan was developed as a companion to the King County Solid
Waste Management Plan, to achieve a regional approach to hazardous
waste management. It also meets State of Washington requirements
that local governments develop a Hazardous Waste Management Plan
by June 1990. Many local governments in King County
(representatives of incorporated cities of the county, King County
Solid Waste Division, Metro, City of Seattle Office of Long-range
Planning, and Seattle-King County Health Department) have worked
together to develop this cooperative Plan. The main participating
agencies were chosen because at present they already share fiscal
and administrative responsibility for many of the proposed plan
elements.
Plan Goals and Objectives
The goal of the program is to protect public health and the
environment from adverse effects that result from improper handling
and disposal of hazardous wastes by small quantity generators
(SQG 's) and households. The main objectives are to:
1. Minimize worker accidents and public exposure to hazardous
waste.
2 . Avoid landfill leachate contamination.
3 . Avoid stormwater and ground water contamination.
4 . Assure that Metro and other municipal wastewater facility
effluents and sludge continue to meet environmental discharge
standards.
5 . Provide an effective, convenient system of Household Hazardous
Waste Collection.
6. Provide a system for handling SQG wastes (with emphasis on
private sector service)
7 . Initiate a public awareness campaign to educate citizens about
responsible hazardous waste handling, including home safety and
fire safety, and hazardous products waste reduction.
Amounts and types of Hazardous Waste to be targeted
The total HHW and SQG hazardous waste is estimated to be 1% of the
solid waste stream.
This figure represents a median percentage derived from available
information on waste composition studies done both locally and
nationally. The amount of 1989 HHW generated was estimated to be
6 , 300 tons, while the 1989 total SQG Hazardous Waste generated was
estimated at 12 , 700 tons.
Therefore, one-third of the total is estimated to be HHW while two-
thirds is produced by SQG's. Approximately 85% of the hazardous
waste by weight is disposed of in the municipal solid waste stream
while 15% ends up in the liquid waste stream. A breakdown of HHW
and SQG wastes by type is illustrated in Attachment A.
Definition of HHW and SQG
Household hazardous wastes are old or unwanted products that
exhibit characteristics of hazardous waste; they may be toxic,
corrosive, ignitable, persistent, reactive, or carcinogenic.
Household hazardous waste is categorically exempt from federal and
state regulations, regardless of the quantity of HHW a household
generates. SQG' s are businesses that produce less than 220 pounds
per month (half a 55 gallon drum) . Any business generating or
storing less than that amount, is not subject to state and federal
hazardous waste regulations. For the types of SQG' s to be targeted
by the Plan see Attachment E-SQG Industries targeted.
Proposed Programs and Services
1. HHW Collection Facilities
2
A network of 6 permanent and 3 mobile collection facilities is
recommended to provide accessible, convenient sites. The
mobile units will rotate around the county on a regular basis.
2 . SOG Collection Facilities
Two mobile facilities are proposed. One in 1990, one in 1992
and will be similar to the HHW mobile units.
3 . HHW Public Education Program and a Schools Education Curriculum
4 . SOG Public Education and information exchange, resource
library and IMEX (Industrial Material Exchange) .
5. SOG Technical Assistance Program
6. SOG Survey and Audit Program to obtain information on waste
quantities, types, and management practices.
7. SOG Subsidized Collection Program will cover 25% of the
disposal costs for SQG's that participate in the on-site
consultation, survey or audit programs. This program will be
in effect for 5 years.
8. Inter-Agency Network of Enforcement officials, inspectors, and
other field staff will conduct inspections of business
operators.
For a detailed list of program elements and implementing agencies,
see Attachment B.
Proposed Staffing
A new layer of administration is added to develop plans for budget
and program implementation, program coordination, and year-end
evaluation. In order to implement the actual programs,
approximately 30 new full time or half time jobs will be created.
These jobs are spread among the participating agencies with Metro
and SKC Health Department receiving the majority share.
Information on projected staffing and program costs are too
detailed to be presented in this summary. Costs of specific
programs can be found in Appendix A of the HHW Plan Manual, or in
the budget summary table 3-2 , section 3 , page. 7.
Funding Requirements
The estimated costs for the first year of operation are $3 . 7
million and for the third year $6.2 million. This is a "best
guess" estimate that includes estimates for cost of collection,
cost of disposal, salaries and benefits, educational programs, and
3
costs for SQG subsidies. The estimates are based on the present
costs of programs now run by Metro, King County Solid Waste,
Seattle Solid Waste Utility, and Seattle-King County Health
Department, and the projected tonnage to be collected. The budgets
have been projected out to the end of the 20 year plan, but are
purely mathematical calculations and probably not relevant past the
third year. (See Attachment C-Plan Budget Summary)
Because of the delays in preparing and approving this master plan,
actual implementation will also be delayed to late 1990. However,
the partial implementation of some programs is already in progress.
The first HHW Mobile unit is an excellent example. It is being
funded with money appropriated in the 1990 budgets of Metro, King
County Solid Waste Division and Seattle-King County Health
Department.
Financing
Financing will be split into two different collection systems, with
80% of allocations to the household portion of the hazardous waste
stream, and 20% allocated to the liquid waste stream portion. This
allocation closely resembles the percentages found in hazardous
waste stream audits.
There have been several suggested methods of financing which
include a combination of State funds and local financing. In order
to fully implement the Plan, State funding is a financial
necessity. The State Local Toxic Control Account has money
available for hazardous waste plans and programs. However, the
level of funding from this account has not been finalized by
D.O.E. , and D.O.E. regulations governing the allocation of these
grant funds also have not been completed. If funds from the State
are not available or are reduced below the estimates calculated for
success, then certain programs in the Plan will be delayed or
eliminated.
The use of a local add-on tax to the Hazardous Substance Tax was
recognized as an alternative, because it would spread the costs of
disposal to the actual users. However, new state legislation would
be needed to implement this option and a significant lead time
would be required and approval of such legislation is uncertain.
Even with State funding, major local funding is necessary. The
local funding will come from a surcharge on solid waste collection
fees, and from a surcharge on sewer fees .
Collecting Fees
The following types of fees are proposed as the most equitable way
and the easiest way to collect fees. There are some
inconsistencies, such as the fee on septic tank owners. Most
septic tank owners rarely or never pump the tank, so that these
4
homeowners will probably not pay their fair share of the liquid
portion. However they will pay for the solid waste portion through
the surcharge on their garbage bill.
Fees on the Solid Waste Portion will be collected in the following
way.
1. Haulers under contract to cities where the hauler bills the
customer, will bill the customer as a pass through fee.
2 . Cities that bill customers directly will contribute a per
account fee for all solid waste accounts.
3 . Seattle Solid Waste Utility will contribute based on a per
account feet for residential accounts, plus a per ton fee for
self haul at Seattle transfer stations.
4 . Residential self haulers to transfer stations will pay a per
vehicle fee. Commercial self haulers a per ton fee.
Fees on the Liquid Waste Portion will be collected in the following
way.
1. Metro will assess a fee on a ,per customer equivalent basis
which will be passed through to the customers. A "customer
equivalent" is 900 cubic feet.
2 . Septic tank owners will pay a fee when the tank is pumped.
Setting Fee Structure
The fees will be set and collected by the Seattle-King County
Health Departments which already has authority to collect such
fees. The Health Department has broad authority to enforce
existing state hazardous waste requirements, and to adopt
additional regulations pertaining to hazardous waste as it affects
the public ' s health. (R.C.W. 70. 95. 160. , County City, or
Jurisdictional Board of Health Regulations. ) The fees will be set
in accordance with the yearly plan and budget proposed by the
Management Coordination Committee. The Management Coordination
Committee consists of one representative of each of the major
participating agencies and the Suburban Cities Association. Those
participating agencies are King County Solid Waste Division, City
of Seattle, Metro, Seattle-King County Health Department, and
Suburban Cities. The procedure to establish the yearly plan on
which the fee structure will be based is a rather complicated one
involving a number of agencies. The procedure is outlined in a
flow chart. (Attachment D-Plan Process to Set Fees)
The flow change (Attachment D) shows that the Suburban Cities
Association has a position on the Management Coordination
Committee, but has no veto power on the fee setting process.
5
Suburban Cities has only a recommendation voiced through the
Interlocal Solid Waste Forum.
Evaluation
Detailed on-going evaluation is an integral part of the plan.
Because many of the programs are new, year end evaluation of the
specific programs are necessary. The Plan proposes that the
methodology for evaluation and the analysis of the evaluation data
be carried out by consultants at the direction of the Management
Coordination Committee. In addition, the City of Seattle Office
of Long-Range Planning will share responsibility for coordinating
evaluation with Metro and the Health Department.
Evaluation criteria will include two types of indicators
Activity Indicators
o numbers of business served
o level of participation at collection facilities
o distribution of education materials
Effectiveness Indicators
o Changes in quantity of hazardous waste in municipal waste
stream
o Quantities and types collected
o Cost per unit of waste collected
o Changes in public attitude
o Changes in business waste disposal policies
A second evaluation which focuses on the overall effectiveness of
the total program will be conducted by an outside organization not
associated with program implementation, such as the University of
Washington.
Concerns for City of Kent
1. The Suburban Cities have no veto power and only limited control
over the fee setting process. Therefore, our citizens will be
impacted by increases in garbage and sewer fees which we do not
actually enact, but must be passed through to our customers.
These fees are projected to be about $2 . 63 per residential
garbage account per year, $45. 22 per commercial customer per
year, and $ . 50 per year on the residential sewer bill for 1990.
However, projections for 1994 show the garbage surcharge
6
doubling. (See Attachment F-Solid Waste Funding Allocations
and Fees)
Based on the proposed 1990 surcharges stated in the Plan, our
total bill will be about $109 , 000 for the solid waste portion.
* 15, 683 residential customers x $2 . 63 per account = $41, 246
** 1, 500 commercial customers x $45 . 22 per account = $67, 830
* includes multifamily on a per unit basis
** "guesstimate"
Presently, the County defines "commercial unit" as a "for
profit" organization, excluding apartment complexes which will
be classified as residential . As such, for a commercial
customer which generates a small amount of garbage, the
additional $3 . 77 (45. 22/12 = per month) could be a significant
increase. With reinstatement of the City's garbage utility any
rate adjustment by the City haulers (Kent Disposal and Tri Star
Disposal) to compensate for these fees will require City
concurrence therewith. It is obvious with the ongoing
litigation per our haulers, we can readily expect the situation
to intensify.
2 . Kent has many SQG;s which will be eligible to receive the
educational material, visits by waste audit personnel and money
from the waste disposal subsidy program. If Kent wishes to
take an active roll in the SQG program and coordinate its SQG
activities with the HHW Master Plan, the City will be
reimbursed for the costs of its program. For a list of
industries targeted for the plan programs, refer to Attachment
E.
3 . Changes to local ordinances may be required. There will be an
effort to strengthen regulations on disposal methods or
disposal bans on undesirable wastes in the municipal solid
waste and liquid waste streams. An effort will also be made
to make the regulations consistent across all jurisdictions.
4 . With the institution of this program and those of the Solid
Waste Management Plan, additional City staff will be required
to coordinate, manage, review, implement and audit same.
Recommendation
This Plan is well thought out to address optimal regional
collection and disposal of the hazardous waste generated by
households and SQG' s. Responsibility for programs is assigned to
the agencies that already have such programs or services in effect,
thereby assuring continuity with existing plans and staff duties.
7
It is the Public Works Department recommendation that the City
adopt the plan as amended by the addendum and contingent however
on an agreement being reached through the Interlocal Forum on the
first year budget; the details of the funding mechanism; the
evaluation strategy to be used and the manner of representation as
the Management Coordination Committee by participating cities.
8
fC
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington, adopting the
Seattle/King County Local Hazardous Waste
Management Plan.
WHEREAS, RCW 70.105.220 requires each local government or
combination of local governments to prepare a local hazardous
waste plan which shall be based on state guidelines; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that moderate risk waste
is being disposed of with solid waste, in sewers and septic
systems, or on other lands, which may be improper for reasons of
public health and environmental protection; and
WHEREAS, King County, in cooperation with the City of
Seattle, Metro and Seattle/King County Department of Public
Health, has completed a Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan for
Seattle-King County, including Kent that is designed to meet state
guidelines and to significantly reduce and divert hazardous waste
from the solid and liquid waste stream, and issued on August 28,
1989, a Final Plan and Environmental Impact Statement for which
the City adopted the EIS on April 26, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Suburban Cities Association participated in
the Solid Waste Interlocal Forum, which through Resolution No.
90-001, recommended adoption of the Plan, as amended by the Plan
Addendum; and
WHEREAS, under the current plan, the budget for local
hazardous waste management programs will be developed by the
Management Coordination committee and recommended to the
Seattle-King County Board of Health for review and approval and
will be funded in part by State funding with the remainder funded
through fees levied on solid waste collection (80%) and sewer fees
(20%) which will be passed on to the public; and
WHEREAS, the State of Washington Planning Guidelines
require that the plan be adopted by resolution by all
participating cities; NOW, THEREFORE,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Seption 1. The City of Kent hereby adopts the February
1989 Hazardous Waste Plan for Seattle-King County, as amended by
the Plan Addendum, dated December 15, 1989; provided that such
adoption is contingent on agreement being reached through the
Interlocal Forum on the first year budget; the details of the
funding mechanism; the evaluation strategy to be used and the
manner of representation on the management coordination committee
by participating cities.
Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Kent, Washington this day of
1990.
Concurred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this
day of _ 1990'
DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR
ATTEST:
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City Of
Kent, Washington, the day of 1990'
(SEAL)
MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK
8460-300
- 2 -
1
Kent City Council Meeting
Date May 15 , 1990
Category Other Business
1. SUBJECT: AFSCME - WASHINGTON STATE COUNCIL OF COUNTY AND CITY
E , LOCAL 2 - -
Personnel Director Ols(nn ,i i.ounced that the City.�arid
AFSCME - Washington State :oncil of County and C ty
emplyees , Local 21 -K, havt:- ,,rrived at a settlement.
He pointed out that this a first time ever contract
for employees of the C -t,, nance Depatment. Olson
explained the provisions c:)t the contract. The Attorney
advised, upon questions fr, )m White and Woods, that it
is not necessary for this item to go to a committee
for approval . so
Hous,er seconded and the motion
carried.
MANN MOVED that the contract. be signed.
4 . "%;Vririm nlJr�" u i.
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO_X_ YES
FISCWPERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED•
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7. CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
DISCUSSION•
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 4D
Ali
---
----------
qB
L1, N
Kent City Council meeting
Date May 15, 1990
Category. Bid
1. SUBJECT: ,KIM — WRITING SURFACES,
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: omy, ,,9 e bid was received on April 30,
1990 for writing surfaces for the East Hill Complex,1Weyel
International.1
ivf
3 . EXHIBITS: Executive Summary
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Administration
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNE& IMPACT: NO X YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED: $26 , 318. 18 includincr tax and delivery
SOURCE OF FUNDS: Public Safety Bond Levy
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember seconds
I!. moves Councilmember
that the writing surface bid be awarded to Weyel International
in the amount of $26, 318 . 18 including tax and delivery.
DISCUSSION:
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5A
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAY 15, 1990
TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WOODS,
COUNCILMEMBERS WHITE, JOHNSON, HOUSER, DOWELL,
MANN, ORR
FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF
SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF WRITING SURFACES FOR STATION 74
---------------------------------------------------------------
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND
This is regarding the bids for the writing surfaces for the
headquarters fire station, training center, police substation and
shooting range. Additional writing surfaces were bid for the EOC
(Emergency Operations Center) .
RECOMMENDED ACTION
The Council award the bid for writing surfaces to Weyel
International .
SIGNIFICANCE
This will enable all the above mentioned areas to function
properly in day to day routine and in the event of disasters.
BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT
This portion of the project has been budgeted through the bond
levy with no impact on the general operating budget of the
department.
ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES
None
tcn
t IC
r L' Kent City Council Meeting
.r .a
1 q . Date May 15 , 1990
k Category Bid
1. SUBJECT: LID 330 - 64.3`H AVENUE
Bid opening on this project. was 'Meld April 17th, with
eight bids received. S nc( the public hearing on
this project was continued to th<_, next Council meeting,
this item was removed from tonight ' s agenda.
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGMD FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMP—AM: NO__X_ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REOUIRED•
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds
the bid submitted by Robison Construction Company in the amount
of $3 , 141,568.28 for LID 330 be accepted.
DISCUSSION•
ACTION:
Council Agenda
Item No. 5B
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
May 15, 1990
TO: Mayor Kelleher
City Council
.n''�/1
FROM: Don Wickstrop, Director of Public Works
RE: LID 330 - 64th Avenue Street Improvement
Bid opening was April 17th with eight bids received. The low bid
was submitted by Robison Construction Company in the amount of
$3 , 141, 568 . 28 .
This project provides improvements to existing portions of 64th
Avenue South between West Meeker Street and West James Street, and
between South 216th Street and South 212th Street, and construction
of an entirely new roadway between West James Street and South
228th Street. Construction costs are estimated to be approximately
$3 , 455, 725. 11. It is recommended the bid submitted by Robison
Construction Company be accepted.
BID SUMMARY
Robison Construction Co. $3 , 141,568 . 28
R. W. Scott Construction Co. $3 ,416, 849 . 96
Tucci & Sons, Inc. $3 , 462 , 796. 11
Active Construction $3 , 571, 842 . 57
Gary Merlino Construction $3 , 995,824 . 28
Scoccolo Construction $4, 409, 165. 92
Tri State Construction $4 , 494, 123 . 80
West Coast Construction $4 , 835, 849 . 51
Engineers Estimate $4 , 322 , 770. 17
f
Kent City Council Meeting
' Date May 15, 1990
Category Bid
1. SUBJECT: AERATOR/PARKS GOLF COMPLEX ,
2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was held April 10 for a golf
course greens aerator with the only bid submitted by Western
Equipment in the amount of $10, 614 . 34. >144s recommended that
this bid be accepted. �j, ,, 6E� r�• til�.i �i.� �� i<= `=
3 . EXHIBITS: memorandum from Jack Spencer
4 . RECOMMENDED BY: staff
(Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. )
5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO !/ YES
FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended
6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:
SOURCE OF FUNDS:
7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Councilmember h� -f� ' ;- moves, Councilmember seconds
the bid submitted by Western Equipment in the amount of
$10, 614. 34 for a Toro Green Aerator be accepted.
DISCUSSION•
1 } {
ACTION•
Council Agenda
Item No. 5C
-�G
1
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF KEiNT
DATE: May 7, 1990 MY 0 & 1990
TO: Don Wickstrom CNGINEERING DEPT.
FROM: Jack Spence
SUBJECT: Aerator/Par s Go Complex
Equipment Rental advertised and received bids on April 10, 1990 for
an Aerator for the Golf Course.
Even though six suppliers were notified, only one bid was received.
This was probably due to this being a specialized piece of
equipment and not available through many companies.
Western Equipment Bid
Toro Green Aerator $ 10, 614 . 34
This machine either meets or exceeds all specifications in our bid
and I recommend we accept this bid.
Funds for purchase are available in the Parks Golf Complex Capital
Outlay for the same amount.
JS/clv
Attachment 's 1
cc: Tim Heydon, Operations Manage/ -�
C350A01 ,J
CITY OF KENT
1990 APPROVED CAPITAL OUTLAY PURCHASE FORM
ACCOUNT # 480-000-6800-6400 PARKS GOLF COMPLEX
1. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM(S) APPROVED: APPROVED AMT:
AERATOR
2. REQUEST TO USE BUDGET FOR ALTERNATE ITEM:
EXPLANATION:
3 . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (REMARKS)
APPROVAL:
PREPARED BY: PRISCILLA SHEA DATE:] ti
c--
DEPARTMENT HEAD: DATE:
CITY ADMINISTRATOR: � DATE:
ATTACH ORIGINAL PLUS ONE COPY TO PURCHASE ORDER.
6�oc,L/� W�h�
"of'.6��D d 0.J LiAf
67
R E P O R T S
A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT
B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE
D. PLANNING COMMITTEE
E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE_
F. PARKS COMMITTEE
G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE Y LirIC
APRIL 17 , 1990
PRESENT: Steve Dowell Hal Rees
Jim White Charlie Kiefer
Leona Orr John G. Kiefer
Don Wickstrom Ralph Rice
Gary Gill William Joy
Jim Hansen Mr. and Mrs. Rust
Canyon Drive Improvements
Dowell referred to the letter from the State which indicated they
would not support a reduction in the speed limits on Canyon until
Kent enforced the existing speed limits. Gill stated part of the
problem was to look at what interim measures could be implemented
to slow people down until the improvement project can be
constructed. Nizlek indicated recent speed studies determined the
average speed to be 45-49 . He indicated there is no traffic
control that will make them slow down . Traffic volumes were
discussed. Dowell asked about a sign on Canyon to alert traffic
coming down hill that the light was red. He inquired about taking
some of the traffic load off Titus. Nizlek indicated that was put
in to divert some of the traffic away from the commercial area.
Dowell reiterated that he feels we shouldn 't sacrifice residential
streets to backups. Wickstrom added that the area around Titus is
zoned multifamily and commercial . White stated that regardless of
zoning, most of the area is single family and we are routing a
tremendous amount of traffic on that road.
Rees stated that for approximately the last 18 months, the Traffic
Unit which is a 5-person unit, has averaged 10-15 hours a month
actual enforcement on Canyon Drive and 35-40 citations a month.
Rees stated that is a considerable portion of the unit' s time
compared to other areas. One of the drawbacks to enforcement on
Canyon Drive is safety for the officer and safety for the public.
White asked if we could increase enforcement on a weekly or monthly
basis to see what the results would be . Rees indicated he thought
that could be accommodated. Nizlek commented his staff could help
in isolating the hours during which speeding is occurring. Rees
added that emergencies and higher priority detail would have some
impact on their ability to increase the enforcement.
Responding to White ' s question, Gill stated we are currently in the
process of acquiring right of way for the construction project
which could take 6-9 months . Thus, we anticipate construction in
1991.
Public Works Committee
April 17 , 1990
Page 2
The Committee asked for a report from the Police Department in two
months.
Traffic Signal Complaints - Ralph Rice
Mr. Rice expressed concern about the pedestrian cross walk signals.
The push buttons seem to be maintenance problems; he has seen kids
take baseball bats to them and the signals are confusing especially
to older pedestrians . Mr. Rice suggested a simple solution to a
lot of problems would be to take the push buttons off and connect
the "Don't Walk" light up to the red and yellow lights on the
vehicular signal , connect the "Walk" light to the green light on
the vehicular signal . Dowell suggested staff discuss this proposal
and send Mr. Rice a letter with the results . Marty Nizlek stated
that he and Mr. Rice have been working together on monitoring a
number of locations that Mr. Rice frequents. White asked about any
State or Federal regulations that require the pedestrian signals
and requested that Nizlek inform the Committee what they are.
Nizlek added these problems are recognized nation wide.
Transportation Improvement Board Vehicle Registration Fee
Wickstrom stated that one of the local options of the gas tax
legislation is a vehicle registration fee that could be instituted
County-wide by County Council ordinance. In order to implement
that option, the County is seeking concurrence from the Cities that
they would support the fee. Wickstrom stated he felt we should do
so to help finance the City' s projects . The fee would generate
approximately $322 , 000 for the City of Kent. Wickstrom added the
revenue generated can be used for road projects only. White asked
if we could use this to retire bonds. Wickstrom stated the City
doesn 't have sufficient Councilmanic bonding capacity available to
raise the matching funds. The Committee unanimously recommended
approval for a letter to be sent to the County supporting
implementation of the vehicle registration fee.
Other Items
Mr. Kiefer asked about the response to the questions he asked at
Council . Gill replied that staff is in the process of preparing
a written response. We have met with the Fisheries Department at
the project site and Mr. Kiefer was in attendance. The meeting
with the Corps of Engineers is set for Wednesday. Gill stated that
once we have met with them we will have a better idea what course
of action.
Public Works Committee
April 17 , 1990
Page 3
Dowell asked if we could respond to Mr. Kiefer' s question about the
alignment. Wickstrom stated that we are not rebuilding the
existing line as it doesn't match with any ultimate future plans
we have for the system. The reason for the new alignment is to
correlate with future plans and other future sources. Gill stated
it is important to note that the impoundment reservoir site was
selected before the Green River Pipe Line #5 project was even an
option. It is an added benefit that the project happens to go
through the reservoir site. The impoundment reservoir is intended
to pick up the winter excesses of the Kent Springs and Clark
Springs sources so they can be used for summer demand. Mr. Kiefer
stated that the impoundment reservoir would require an
environmental checklist and asked what would happen if the
transmission line is built in this new alignment and something
prevents the reservoir from being built. Wickstrom stated we would
address that at the time we begin the impoundment project which is
scheduled for 2008 but we have to address the long range plan with
current projects . White stated that the Council has obligations
to its citizens today but also to its citizens in the future and
that is why these comprehensive plans are developed - to address
the issues and problems we foresee in the future. Wickstrom
confirmed for Dowell that the ratio between residential and
commercial water usage is about 50/50. Residential has higher peak
demands of about 3 : 1 ratio of summer time demand to winter time
demand whereas industrial is more 2 : 1. Dowell surmised that the
concern over all the water going for industrial use is not valid
and the demands will remain the same regardless of source of
supply. Gill pointed out the reason for the alignment is to keep
the line below the hydraulic grade so the system will function as
a gravity system. Otherwise, other alignments would require we
place the line up to 50-60 feet deep or build a pump station to
pump the water which would be exorbitantly costly to maintain.
There was discussion regarding treatment of the water coming from
Kent Springs. Wickstrom clarified that we currently chlorinate the
water at the source (Kent Springs) since we have customers on the
transmission main. With the development of the impoundment
reservoir, those customers would be removed from the transmission
main, becoming customers of other water districts in the area, and
the water would not be treated until it leaves the reservoir.
Surface Water and Drainage Code and Bonds
Williamson stated he had made changes to the code as presented in
the packet but needed to spend a little further time to review the
Public Works Committee
April 17 , 1990
Page 4
remainder of the code and revise the ordinance and would expect to
have this available by the next meeting.
Other
Williamson informed the Committee there is some concern by the
contractors regarding the language in our performance bonds which
requires the contractor to hold the City harmless from loss or
damage by reason of any carelessness or negligence on his part or
on the part of a subcontractor. They are contending this takes it
out of the performance area. Williamson stated that without this
language the City would have to rely solely on the insurance
carried by the contractor. Williamson added that this language has
been in the bond form for quite some time and we have not had any
concerns over it until now. White stated that he felt if it
needed updating then we should take a look at it; however, he is
not concerned about what the bonding companies or contractors say
about it but whether the City and their citizens are protected.
Williamson stated he would like to see the language remain in the
bond form.
Mr. Joy inquired about the purpose of a proposed 10-inch water line
shown in the comprehensive plan on S .E. 284th and 109th Avenue S .E.
Wickstrom explained it is intended to loop our system to provide
better fire flow protection and distribution to the service area.
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES
April 10 , 1990
71
COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Christi Houser 0
Paul Mann
Jon Johnson
STAFF PRESENT: Ed Chow
Jim Hansen
Tony McCarthy
Sandra Driscoll
Don Wickstrom
Ron Spang
Gary Gill
Yvonne Knox
May Miller
Becky Fowler
Teri Mertes
GUESTS PRESENT: Lyle Price, Kent News Journal
APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS
All claims for the period ending March 310, 1990 in the amount of
$1, 239 , 266 . 69 were approved for payment .
WATER QUALITY ENGINEER POSITION
Public Works Director Wickstrom requested that the water quality
position approved in the 1990 budget be established as an
engineering rather than a technical position. After evaluation by
Public Works and Personnel it was determined that the position is
required to perform engineering type duties.
The. funds are available in the 1990 budget to cover adjustment
since the position has been vacant all year. This issue was
recommended by the IPC.
The Committee recommended to Council. the position change to
engineer by a vote of 3-0 .
FIRE CHIEF 'S SALARY LEVEL Committee that Personnel
Personnel Analyst Fowler informed the
Director Olsen was out of town at a conference. Fowler said that
the fire chief ' s salary level issue hasn' t changed since it was
discussed at the Council meeting on 11/21/89 . The position is
unique in its responsibilities due to service of District 37 and
Valley Communications and it is difficult to find a comparable
salary.
Fowler requested Personnel Director Olsen bring the issue back to
Council in the form of a presentation.
The Committee recommended the presentation by a vote of 3-0 be
addressed at the 4/17/90 meeting, in open session under Other
Business.
USE OF TERMINALS AND/OR PC 'S FOR CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
Information Services Director Spang informed the Committee that
Councilmember Johnson received a PC and modum to access City
information from his home, as a test pilot project. This raised
questions and interest by other Councilmembers and City staff.
This pilot project is currently being funded from Information
Services budget for an undecided time frame to see if there is a
need for��CIs or Terminals for all Councilmembers. If this need
exists tha5 the expense can be included in the 1991 budget.
It was mentioned that the City of Bellevue provides terminals for
their Councilmembers . Spang disclosed the price difference between
a terminal , $1300 and a PC, $4400 as being quite significant.
Spang was also concerned about the support issues arising after
hours and away from the place of business .
The Committee decided that Councilmember Mann would be provided a
terminal and training for at home access for a two month period.
Councilmembers Mann and Johnson will than report back to the
Operations Committee on July 10 , 1990 their evaluation of this
pilot project.