Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 02/06/1990 Kent Cit ofv . Councml MeetinCRY9 Agenda �e Mayor Dan Kelleher Council Members Judy Woods, President Leona Orr Steve Dowell Christi Houser Jon Johnson Paul Mann Jim White February 6, 1990 + Office of the City Clerk I CITY COUNCIL MEETING February 6, 1.990 Summary Agenda City of Kent Council Chambers Office of the City Clerk 7 : 00 p.m. NOTE: Items on the Consent Calendar are either routine or have been previously discussed. Any item may be removed by a Councilmember. The Council may add and act upon other items not listed on this agenda. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. TUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Employee of the Month B. Proclamation - National Child Passenger Safety Awareness r 1 " Week C. Proclamation - American History Month D. Drinking Driver Task Force 2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS A. LID 335 - 77th Avenue S . Street Improvements B. Alexander Avenue North Street Vacation 3 . CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of Minutes B. Approval of Bills C. Completion of Remodel of Station 71 D. Kent North Park Tot Lot Rehabilitation E. Mayoral Appointments F. Agreement with King County - Private Security Agencies G. 1990 City Art Plan H. A & M Elevator Service Contract I. LID 300 Payoff J. Venture Fund Authorization K. LID 328 - West Valley Highway Improvements Phase I L. 1989 Asphalt Overlays M. AT&T Building N. Conveyance of Real Property through Deed and/or Dedication - Resolution 0. Charge in Lieu of Assessment - 116th Ave. S .E. Sanitary Sewer Extension P. Side Sewer Repair Maintenance and Operation and City Right of Way - Ordinance Q. Contract with State - Fire Academy R. Fire Department Aerial Apparatus S. Eastbrook Business Park Preliminary Subdivision T. Jail Health Services Contract U. Street Vacation - Resolution V. Parking Ordinance - Gowe St . 4 . OTHER BUSINESS . A. Eastbrook Business Park Rezone B. Canterbury Place Preliminary Subdivision C: Flood Disaster Assistance- Resolution 5 . BIDS A. Special Populations Resource Center - Kitchen Renovation 6 . REPORTS CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly heard. A. Employee of the Month B. Proclamation - National Child Passenger Safety Awareness Week C. Proclamation - American History Month D. Drinking Driver Task Force Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: L. I .D. 335 - 77TH AVE. SO. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This date has been set for the public hearing on formation of L. I. D. 335 for street improvements of 77th Ave. So. from So. 212th to So. 202nd and of So. 206th St. from 77th Ave. So. to the west end of the railroad tracks. The City Clerk has given the proper notification to the property owners and the Director of Public Works describe:{the project. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from the Director of Public Works 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended__ Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS: LID _ OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT• _ CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember '° 1 moves, Councilmember t seconds that the City Attorney be directed to prepare the Ordinance creating L. I . D. 335 for 77th Ave. So. Street Improvements DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 2A �J DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 31, 1990 TO: Mayor Kelleher City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom RE: LID 335 - 77th Avenue S. and S . 206th Street Improvement (S. 212th St. to S . 202nd St. ) GENERAL February 6th has been set for the formation public hearing for LID 335 - 77th Avenue South and S . 206th Street Improvement (S . 212th St. to S. 202nd St. ) . BACKGROUND Over the past number of years there has been substantial interest in development within the project area. However, the area is served by substandard access roads. Therefore, the City has been working toward the improvement of the roadways involved. During 1980 a-__property owner meeting was held to discuss an improvement project and LID formation. At that time there was insufficient interest. Since all of the improvements could not be installed at time through an LID, the property owners were to ld that as development takes place, each developer would have to include roadway improvements in his development plans in accordance with the City' s Public Works Ordinance. In lieu of actual construction at the time of development, the developer would have the option of executing an LID Participation Covenant. once enough covenants had been executed, an LID formation could proceed. Since 1980, numerous developments or developmental activities have taken place which have resulted in either actual construction of improvements or executing of LID covenants. Therefore, it now appears to be an appropriate time to again pursue the formation of an LID for the needed roadway improvements. Last Spring, the City developed a preliminary proposal for the improvement of 77th Avenue S . and S . 206th Street between S . 212th Street and S . 202nd Street and for the formation of an LID to provide the funding. A letter was sent to the effected property owners and a meeting was held. Various property owners expressed interest in adding a traffic signal at 77th Avenue and S. 212th Street to the project. The City requested input from the property 1 owners regarding the addition of the signal and sufficient interest was shown. The City then conducted a study of the intersection and found that a signal is warranted at this location. The Public Works Committee of the City Council has authorized the staff to proceed with an LID proposal, which also includes the traffic signal. The traffic signal benefit boundary included properties not in the originally proposed boundary for the street improvements so a letter was sent to the property owners affected by the addition of the signal and another property owner meeting was held. The City Council stated its intention to proceed with the project De by passing Resolution No. 1223 on cember 19 , 1989 and scheduling the formation public hearing. NEED FOR IMPROVEMENTS A. Drainage - Currently there is no drainage system in the project area. Ponding of storm water accuFs often. A complete and adequate drainage system for the area is needed to provide for disposal of storm water. A complete drainage system is planned for the area including stubs to the adjacent properties for future connections. B. Street - The existing road is substandard. Improvements such as curbing, sidewalks, lighting, landscaping and additional paving width are required to bring the street up to code to meet both functional and visual requirements . Therefore, these improvements are planned into the new road. C. Utilities - Various properties within the area are not currently hooked up to City water and sanitary sewer or are not fully serviced for their potential highest and best use. Prior to widening and rebuilding the roadway, these utilities must be extended outside of the roadway to avoid future cutting and excavation thereof for these services. Please note that future cutting and excavation of the road will be strongly discouraged if not prohibited. Therefore, the construction must take place now. D. Signal - Engineering studies show that a signal is warranted at 77th Avenue and S . 212th Street. Existing conditions which indicate a signal is warranted include high intersecting, traffic volumes, interruption of continuous traffic, high four hour traffic volume and high peak hour volume. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed project is the improvement of 77th Avenue South from S. 212th Street to S . 202nd Street and S. 206th Street from 77th Avenue South to the west end at the railroad tracks . 2 The project includes the following improvements: 1. Curb and gutter 2 . Cement concrete sidewalks except along the railroad right-of- way 3 . Widened roadway, 36 feet between curbs 4 . Storm drainage system 5 . Street lighting (installed on Puget Power poles) 6 . Street trees 7 . Sanitary sewer and water main stubs to properties as required 8 . Channelization and traffic signing 9 . Traffic signal at the intersection of S . 212th Street and 77th Avenue South It should be noted that the roadway has already been improved at the northwest corner of 77th Avenue South and S . 206th Street. Therefore, this portion of the roadway is not included in the proposed project. PROJECT FUNDING It is proposed that the project be funded 100% by the Local Improvement District method. The estimated total cost is $11261, 704 . 10 . Each property is assessed a share of this cost. The total estimated cost for the signal is $128 , 732 . 50 . METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The costs under each category of assessment are distributed to each property benefiting as follows: 1. Street - The assessments are based on square footage within the assessment boundary. The assessment rate decreases with 120 foot zones back from the public right-of-way with a maximum of six zones. The front zone rate is six times the rear zone; the second zone from the front is five times the rear zone and so on. Property further than 720 feet from the edge of the right- of-way is not assessed. 2 . Sanitary Sewer and Water Stubs - The cost for each stub is assessed to the property being serviced by the stub. 3 . Traffic Signal - The assessments are based on square footage L% within the assessment boundary. However, several properties which have an alternate access to S . 212th Street are assessed at a 50% rate. PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT Upon Council passing the ordinance confirming the final assessment roll, there is a 30-day period in which any portion or all of the 3 assessment can be paid over a ten-year period, wherein each year' s payment is one-tenth of the principal plus interest on the unpaid balance. The interest will be what the market dictates . FORMATION OF THE LID To approve an LID, there must be support from property representing 40 percent of the proposed LID assessments. In this case, the 40 percent figure is $504 , 681. 64 . EASEMENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION The construction of the project will require property acquisition in some locations to provide the right-of-way. Also slope easements are required. Each property involved will be appraised followed by negotiation between the City and owner. Final settlement can be a direct payment to the owner or can be a credit toward the assessment thereby reducing the amount of the yearly payments. ENVIRONMENTAL A declaration of non-significance was issued by the Planning Department on January 5, 1990 . There were no conditions or mitigating measure specified. LID COVENANTS It should be noted that properties representing 48% of the LID assessment are encumbered by LID no protest covenants . This means the maximum possible protest level is 52% which is insufficient to defeat the LID by protest. However the actual decision to proceed with the LID rests with the City Council . 4 WLJLJ J _ Od ~O a (NJ W C6 W J U- 30 f� J O i tLLr U' W ON F- W U W t15 m F- (r to � U Z O OD F— L W _1 1) O 1 cf) (n W U a O Ir Q O Q: J Q 0o U CL N W W Y W X to J a: F W Q N a w ~ oun Gv�r W a�av ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT L.I.D:..335- 77TH- AVE. S. W — 6S. 206TH ST. IMPROVEMENT 3 QO (S. 212TH.ST.. TO S. 202ND ST.) SCALE NnNF W DRAW N CHECKED DATE APPROVED CITYFILE NO. KUKER-RANKEN INC./107960 kf E. k 22 t .---L.I,D. BOUNDARY ( I I O V 220 II I If al 19 y ' I rv� F- � 16 I 1 "- - - - °( 17 OPEN SPACENOT \ ! ✓✓1' �.n.. f w AS ESSEO m I � � SCRLE: I"=400' I6 I� PROPOSED ROADWAY. ' - IMPROVEMENT 1 TREET ASSESSMENT OUNDARY A.N. I- 16) I - 3 4 15 7 L.I.D. 335 \� 10 9 77TH AVE. AND S. 206TH ST. ( (S.212TH ST. TO S. 202ND ST. I ASSESSMENT NUMBER 6 TYPICAL) ---23 .. I 6 1 n 4 L I 2 PROPOSED . S. 212TH ST. > SIGNAL ASSESSMENT MAP firr// C4� Kent City Council Meeting Date_ February 6 , 1990 `` Category Public Hearings 1. SUBJECT: STREET VACATION - PORTION OF ALEXANDER AVE. NO. STV-90-1 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public hearing will consider a request by Gary J. Chilchoate to vacate a portion of Alexander Ave. lying between Guiberson Street and Maclyn Street. Proper legal notice has been given by the City Clerk. 3 . EXHIBITS: Staff report and map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) Conditional approval . 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT-_ NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS : OPEN HEARING: PUBLIC INPUT• CLOSE HEARING: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember �'' } moves, Councilmember seconds r / -To a-pprave/d4zi-ppr-&ve-fm-ocl €y -and approve Alexander Ave. Street Vacation No. STV-90-1 with one condition as recommended by staff and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the ordinance upon receipt of compensation. DISCUSSION: __ _. ACTION: ..__._._ Council Agenda Item No. 2B a� KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 1, 1990 MEMO TO: MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: JAMES P. HARRIS , PLANNING DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON AN APPLICATION TO VACATE A PORTION OF ALEXANDER AVENUE Recommendation: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS I. Name of Applicant Gary J. Chilcoate 905 E. Guiberson Kent, WA. 98031 II. Reason for Requesting Vacation The applicant states, "To bring the new carport located at 905 E. Guiberson into the proper sideyard setback. This Street Vacation is applied for at the suggestion of the Kent Planning Council . And has been coordinated with Jim Harris - Planning Director, Bob Hutchinson - Building Dept. , Gerald McCaughn - Property Manager, Don Wickstrom - Public Works Director, Helen Wickstrom - Parks & Recreation, and Jim Hanson - Asst. City Administrator. " III . Staff Recommendation After reviewing comments from the following departments and agencies: Public Works Department • Don Wickstrom, Director • Tim Heydon, Public Works Operations Manager • Jerry McCaughan, Property Manager Fire Department . Norm Angelo, Fire Chief U. S . West Communications Puget Power METRO and conducting our own review, the Planning Department recommends that the request to vacate a portion of ALEXANDER AVENUE as mentioned in Resolution No. 1226 and shown on the accompanying map, be APPROVED with the following condition: 1. The City to receive compensation for this street vacation at one-half the full appraised value thereof. NOTE: Under Kent Ordinance 2333 this street is considered a Class "C" street for which no public funds were expended for the acquisition, improvement or maintenance. As such, compensation at one-half the appraised value may be required. JPH: ca j r ❑ �❑ o C RLEXANDER HVE. rn rnm M cc `J m cn y � L1 z ❑ y 1uT�J' � ` J I y cn �l O ci m a �r z C] N I � o z � • - ST (Z�EZ V�CL�TI Dtil ResolLi 0LA ( 2Zlp Area. fcjoesfe -o be vac+ed C ,l Sca(L .O UN W Qwood �• �cCK ri w d W c W • � � CANC. - .8� Q CONSENT CALENDAR 3 . City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that Consent ,11alendar Items A through V be approved. Discussion Action , r MJL 3A. Approval of Minutes. nnn� Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of January 16, 1990. nr U" 3B. Approval of Bills. Approval of payment of the bills received through February 5, 1990 after auditing of the Operations Committee at its meeting at 3 : 00 p.m. on February 15, 1990. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 1 / 10 90 87166-87167 $ 43 , 701 .43 1 / 16 - 1 /29/90 87551 -87625 237 ,669 . 63 1 /30/90 87630-87998 1 ,148 , 739 . 86 $1 ,4 00 ,11 0 . 92 1 /30/90 87626-87629 28 ,808 . 45 1 /31 /90 87999-88284 390 ,652 . 85 Approval of checks issued for payroll : 419 ,461 . 30 Date Check Numbers Amount 1120791T 130239-13086a $ 736 ,533 . 35 Council Agenda Item No. 3 A-B 3A� Kent, Washington January 16, 1990 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7 : 00 p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers Dowell, Houser, Johnson, Mann, Orr and Woods, City Administrator Chow, City Attorney Driscoll, Planning Director Harris, Public Works Director Wickstrom, Finance Director McCarthy, Police Chief Frederiksen, Fire Chief Angelo, Assistant City Administrator Hansen, Interim Personnel Director Olson and Information Services Director Spang. Councilmember White and Parks Director Wilson were not in attendance. Approximately 25 people were at the meeting. PUBLIC (PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - ITEM 1A) COMMUNICATIONS Crimestoppers Month. Mayor Kelleher read a proclamation recognizing Crime Stoppers International , Seattle-King County Crime Stoppers and the Kent Police Department for their contributions to crime control and declared the month of January, 1990 as "Crime Stoppers Month" in the City of Kent. (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4B - ADDED) Single Family Housing Report. Joe Street noted that he had seen a copy of the City's Single Family Housing Report and that it was well done. He suggested that included in the report should be the notation that no single family dwelling pays its own way. He noted that originally Bellevue and Mercer Island had planned to be strictly single family but had found that it was not economically feasible to exclude apartments. He passed out copies of a newspaper clipping in which Jim Ellis comments on this subject. Street suggested that Kent should be thinking of what cuts could be made in order to subsidize single family zoning if the multi-family zoning is cut. CONSENT MANN MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through N CALENDAR be approved. Dowell seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of January 2 , 1990 . 1 January 16, 1990 HEALTH AND (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3H) SANITATION Alex Four-flex. ACCEPTANCE of the bill of sale and warranty agreement for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 228 feet of sanitary sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of S .E. 248th and 110th Ave. S . E. for the Alex Four- Plex Project and release of cash bond. STREET VACATION (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3N) Street Vacation - Ordinance. ADOPTION of Ordinance 2895 approving the vacation of a portion of Third Avenue for the Centennial Building. The public hearing was concluded on July 18 , 1989 . SIDEWALKS It was noted that Joe Street had asked for a report on the City ' s policy regarding sidewalks. Wickstrom stated that he would provide Mr. Street with that information before the next Council meeting. WATER (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3K) Clark Springs Water Source. AUTHORIZATION for the establishment of initial budget of $75, 000 for the purpose of investigating and assuring the integrity of the water of Clark Springs source, in concurrence with the recommendation of. the Public Works Committee. PRELIMINARY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3F) SUBDIVISION Canterbury P1 Preliminary Subdivision No. SU-89-4 . AUTHORIZATION to set February 6 for a public meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner' s recommendation of conditional approval of an application by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. for a 15 lot single family residential preliminary subdivision. The property is located north of S .E. 248th St. between 98th Ave. S . and proposed 100th Ave . S . (extended) . COMPREHENSIVE Linda Martinez , Chair of the Planning Commission, PLAN voiced her dismay that consideration of the multi- family housing recommendations had been removed from Multi-Family tonight ' s agenda. She pointed out that the Planning Residential Commission had studied this item for at least nine Zoning months , and has held twelve public hearings and six 2 January 16, '_990 COMPREHENSIVE workshops. She stated it is frustrating to the PLAN public as well as the Planning Commission to have another delay. She urged the Council to put this Multi-Family item on the February 6 agenda, and to make a Residential decision at that time. Zoning Planning Director Harris concurred that it would unfair to discuss this item tonight, since the notices were not mailed when the item was pulled from the agenda. He also noted for Dowell that there is no material cn this item in the Council ' s agenda packet. Mayor Kelleher informed Ms . Martinez that the Council President sets the agenda, and that Counc=_ President White had pulled this item. NOTE: ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 19 , 1990, MAYOR KELLEHEs. CALLED A SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING FOR 7 : 00 PM ON TUESDAY , JANUARY 30 , 1990 ,_ TO CONSIDER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PLANNING COM14ISSION RELATI';�- TO MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING FOR THE EAST HILL AND FOR THE VALLEY FLOOR. THIS SPECIAL MEETING WILL BE HE_I AT THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH AT 11010 SE 248TH, KENT, WA. (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4D) (ADDED BY COUNCILMEMBER ORR) Emergency Ordinance - Land Use and Zoning. Orr noted that she had learned over the weekend that Planning Commission ' s recommendations for the Eas_ Hill and for the Valley Floor had been removed frc_-� tonight ' s agenda and was now scheduled for the (Changed to February-6 meeting. She noted that she had today January 30th asked the City Attorney to prepare this proposed See NOTE above) ordinance providing for temporary interim zoning controls on land use zones for multi-family development. She distributed copies and MOVED tc adopt Ordinance 2896 . Woods seconded. Orr noted that in 1986 at the first Town Hall Meeting, the public stated its concern with the number of mult_- family units . Comparison figures show 748 apart-.e-: units and 34 single family homes built in 1989 . Planning Commission and Planning Department have 3 January 16, 1990 COMPREHENSIVE spent two years working on a plan and the PLAN recommendation is ready for the Council . She noted she had proposed the emergency ordinance to prevent Multi-Family permit processing during the interim period. She Residential pointed out that it has been a month since the Zoning Commission made its recommendation and would now be 3 weeks before Council consideration on February 6 . Orr pointed out that the City does not have a vesting ordinance and suggested that one be prepared so that guidelines could be in place showing the vested interests in a given piece of property. Upon the Mayor' s question, Driscoll explained that under this proposed ordinance, any applications for multi-family housing development in areas already zoned, or areas where it is a conditional use, would now be under an interim zoning of R1-20, the same interim zoning which the City provides for annexations. This zoning allows for 20, 000 square foot lots. It is proposed that this ordinance be effective for 90 days or until the Council acts on the Planning Commission' s recommendations, whichever comes first. Dowell noted that this item was removed from the agenda on Thursday, and this ordinance was just distributed and is proposed for immediate passage and therefore, he would not support adoption. Orr clarified that the ordinance had not been to the Planning Committee or Planning Commission, that she had asked just today to have it prepared. She expressed her concern that more property owners will be able to get permits before the Council considers the issue and pointed out that this has already happened in several instances. Dowell pointed out that some people had been told that the multi-family zoning issue had been pulled from the agenda and they had therefore left. It was determined for Mann that a unanimous vote was required for passage of an emergency ordinance. Driscoll explained that there were serious legal concerns surrounding the adoption of an emergency ordinance. The Council must make certain findings, without which the ordinance could be legally challenged. Initiative and referendum laws require that emergency ordinances require a unanimous vote. Ordinance 2896 failed to pass with only Orr, Woods and Mann supporting it. 4 January 16, 1990 SURPLUS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3I) EQUIPMENT Telemetry Equipment. AUTHORIZATION to declare surplus and offer for sale water and sewer telemetry equipment which has been replaced by updated equipment, as recommended by the Public Works Committee. PROPERTY (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3J) ACQUISITION Real Property Acquisition Agreement. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign an extension agreement with the Washington State Department of Transportation for real property acquisition services. The current agreement will expire in February, 1990. The State ' s acquisition services are used for projects in which state and federal guidelines must be explicitly followed so as not to jeopardize any federal funding. APPOINTMENTS (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3L) Mayoral Appointments. CONFIRMATION of the following appointments by Mayor Kelleher: Human Services Commission Reappointment of Marvin Eckfeldt to 1/93 . Reappointment of Dee Moschel to 1/93 . Appointment of Alice Gregory to replace John Pardo, who recently resigned. This term will expire 1/91. Appointment of Father Peter Duggan to replace Rev. Bill Carleton, who recently resigned. This term will expire 1/92 . Appointment of Peg Mazen. This term will expire 1/93 . Civil Service Commission Appointment of Ron Forest to replace Robb Dreblow, who has resigned. This term will expire 4/94 . 5 January 16, 1990 POLICE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3C) Amendment to Ordinance Related to Guns. ADOPTION of Ordinance 2892 amending Kent City Code to conform to State law. The Legislature requires that city ordinances related to guns be consistent with State law. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3D) Amendment to Ordinance Related to Dangerous Weapons. ADOPTION of Ordinance 2893 amending Kent City Code 9 . 02 . 106 to correct certain typographical errors that may change the meaning of the ordinance if not corrected. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3E) Amendment to Possession of Marijuana Laws. ADOPTION of Ordinance 2894 which makes Kent City Ordinances related to controlled substances consistent with State law as is required in Chapter 271 of 1989 Legislature. (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3G) D.A.R.E. Program. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of contributions for the D.A.R.E. Program in the amount of $50 in memory of Maury Stratta. PERSONNEL (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) Salary Increase for Non-Represented Employees. Upon the City Attorney' s suggestion, the Council agreed to discuss this item after the executive session. Driscoll had pointed out that while this item would not be discussed during the executive session, matters which were discussed in the executive session may influence the Council ' s decision. (Parks Budget) (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4E - ADDED) Golf Course Reorganization. Finance Director McCarthy noted that the Operations Committee had met at 5 : 30 p.m. this afternoon to discuss reorganization of the golf course. It is proposed to add staff to keep the driving range open longer hours and to give lessons. The City Internal Budget Committee is not ready to make a recommendation as to whether the City should be in the pro shop 6 January 16, 1990 PERSONNEL business because a loan of approximately $250- $300, 000 would be required. This is not recommended (Parks Budget) as the golf course is supposed to be self- supporting. Recommended for approval is the addition of 5 people, plus part-time cashiers and the upgrade of a maintenance worker, totaling $93 , 816 . It is proposed that the revenue at the golf course can be increased sufficiently to fund these additional positions so there will be no burden on the City ' s general or capital improvement fund. McCarthy described this as an interim compromise until additional analysis is completed as to whether the City or a contractor should run the facility. HOUSER MOVED to adopt the recommendation as outlined in the Operations Committee memo dated today and Mann seconded. Dowell stated that since the Golf Complex is part of the Parks Department, he hoped that these terms might, in the future, be discussed at the Parks Committee. The motion then carried unanimously. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through January 22 , 1990 after auditing of the Operations Committee at its meeting at 3 : 00 p.m. on February 1, 1990 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount 12/29/89 - 87136 - 87165 $ 102 , 129 . 92 1/10/90 1/11/90 87168 - 87174 54 , 954 . 28 1/12/90 87175 - 87550 943 , 427 . 28 $1, 100, 511.48 Approval of checks issued for payroll : Date Check Numbers Amount 1/5/90 129616 - 130238 $ 719, 683 . 94 7 January 16, 1990 COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR - ITEM 3M) Council Absence. APPROVAL of Councilman Whites request to have his absence from the January 16 meeting excused. He will be out of town and unable to attend. (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4C - ADDED) Council President. Houser nominated Judy Woods for Council President. Johnson seconded. There were no further nominations. MANN MOVED that the nominations be closed. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. The Mayor declared Woods to be Council President. Woods thanked her colleagues and announced committees as follows: Planning: Johnson (Chair) , Houser, Orr Public Works: White (Chair) , Dowell, Orr Operations: Houser (Chair) , Mann, Johnson Parks: Dowell (Chair) , Johnson, White Public Safety: Mann (Chair) , Dowell, Orr EXECUTIVE At 7 : 45 p.m. , City Administrator Chow stated that SESSION there would be an executive session of approximately 30 minutes . The following items have been noted on the Council agenda to discuss during executive session: 1. Potential litigation 2 . Acquisition of real estate where public knowledge regarding such consideration would cause a likelihood of increased price. 3 . Collective bargaining . It was determined for Dowell that salary increases for non-represented employees (Item 4A) would not be discussed during the executive session. The meeting reconvened at 8 : 30 p.m. Sale of Property to Young. Driscoll recommended approval of the agreement between James Young and the City for Young ' s purchase of property by the golf course. She noted that the agreement was necessary as one of the documents for closing of the sale. WOODS SO MOVED. Mann seconded and the motion carried. 8 January 16, 1990 PERSONNEL (OTHER BUSINESS - ITEM 4A) Salary Increase for Non-Represented Employees. Interim Personnel Director Don Olson distributed a handout to the Council which lists the COLA increases for various cities, and notes that the average is 4 . 29% . He stated that this has been discussed recently in both the Informal Budget Committee and the Informal Personnel Committee meetings and that both committees recommend a 4% increase effective January 1, 1990. Upon Dowell 's question, Olson noted that the 4 . 29% average increase is for wages only, not benefits. Dowell stated that he feels 4% is too low. HOUSER MOVED to increase the 1990 salary of all non-represented employees by 4% , effective January 1, 1990, subject to further retroactive salary increases as may be determined and approved by Council . Mann seconded and the motion carried. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8 : 35 p.m. Marie Jensen, CMC City Clerk 9 Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6 , 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: - CAE4� REMODEL OF STATION 71 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of the construction contract with C.E. Skinner, Inc. for completion of the remodel construction for Station 71. This contract was completed within the scheduled time frame. 3 . EXHIBITS: Executive summary 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Fire Administration (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: Final payment has been made to contractor. Retainage is being held. SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3C 3L EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FEBRUARY 6 , 1990 TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, COUNCIL PRESIDENT WHITE, COUNCILMEMBERS JOHNSON, WOODS, HOUSER, DOWELL, MANN, ORR FROM: NORM ANGELO, FIRE CHIEF SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF THE REMODEL OF STATION 71 --------------------------------------------------------------- INTRODUCTIONIBACKGROUND Contract for construction was signed with C.E. Skinner, Inc. of Puyallup on the 21st of June in 1989 . The original contract sum was $682 , 409 , without tax. The Fire Department took occupancy of this station on December 19 , 1989 . It has been the Fire Department ' s pleasure to work with this contractor. The construction went as smooth as expected with minimal "surprises" and was completed within the scheduled time frame. The Fire Department is recommending processing the paperwork to notify the Department of Labor and Industries and Department of Revenue that work has been completed. Upon receipt of the necessary certificates, we will then be able to release retainage to the Contractor. RECOMMENDED ACTION Council accept this project as complete and authorize the release of the retainage upon receipt of appropriate documentation from the Departments of Revenue and Labor and Industries. SIGNIFICANCE This is the final phase for the remodel of Station 71 and with this successful completion allows the Fire Department to maintain all the projects in a timely fashion. Executive Summary to the Mayor and the City Council February 6, 1990 Page 2 BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT This project has been budgeted through the bond levy with no impact on the general operating budget of the department- ALTERNATIVES/CONSEQUENCES None tcn •r � n Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: I #T-II9F�T47�.. D—� TOT LOT REHABILITATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept as complete the Kent North Park Tot Lot Rehabilitation (Kiwanis Tot Lot No. 2) project and authorization to release retainage to Golf Landscaping upon receipt of State releases. Contract $22 , 194 . 00 Sales Tax 1 , 797 . 71 Change order _ 0 Total Cost $2.3 , 991. 71 3 . EXHIBITS: Lettr from Contractor showing one year guarantee from date of ac \eptance. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Committee (meeting of 1/25/90) , Parks Department (Committee, Staff, , Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSOi*L IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : Community Development Block Grant Program Budget 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D 3� a LANDSCAPING& O CONSTRUCTION,INC. GO FL••263K0 38016 MILITARY ROAD SOUTH FAX#1206)838-8448 (206)838-2567 AUBURN,WASHINGTON 98001 (206)952 2948 January 23, 1990 City of Kent 220 - 4th Avenue So. Kent, WA 98032 To Whom It May Concern: Golf Landscaping, Inc. certifies the playground equipment installed by our firm at the Kiwanis Tot Lot #2 park located at 2nd and Cloudy Streets in Kent has been installed in accordance with drawings and specifications. Further, we guarantee this work to be free from defects in workmanship or materials for a period of one ( 1) year from date of final acceptance, and that we will make good without delay any defects without additional cost to the owner. Very truly, Fred Leenstra President FL/ct 6 t Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: MAYORAL APPOINTMENTS 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor's appointments as follows: Planning Commission Colleen Miller to replace Gabriella Uhlar-Heffner, who resigned. This term will expire 12/31/91 Human Services Reappointment of Peter Mourer through 12/31/90 Arts Commission Kieko Cullen to replace Don Campbell , who resigned. This term will expire 10/91 I 3 . EXHIBI S: Letters fr/3m Mayor Kelleher 4 . RECOMMENDEb BY: d°fayor (Committed, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISC /PERSONNEL IMPACT:_ NO / YES FISCAL/PERSgNNEL'IOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIREb: $ SOURCE OF" FUNDS : 7 . CITY COAJNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3E 3 E : MEMORANDUM ' TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR DATE: JANUARY 31, 1990 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF KEIKO CULLEN TO ARTS COMMISSION I have recently appointed Ms. Keiko Cullen as a member of the Kent Arts Commission. Ms. Cullen will replace Don Campbell, who has resigned. Ms. Cullen is employed at the Boeing Company, teaches festival dancing at White River Buddhist Church and plays the Japanese banjo, called a shamesen. She frequently visits schools demonstrating the dancing and playing the shamesen. She also finds time for her own business, Keiko' s Alterations. Ms. Cullen's term will become effective immediately and continue through 10/91. I submit this for your confirmation. DK:jb cc: Ed Chow, City Administrator Barney Wilson, Parks & Recreation Director Kent Arts Commission Members MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS / FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYORZ�� DATE: JANUARY 24 , 1990 SUBJECT: RE-APPOINTMENT OF PETER MOURER TO HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION I have recently re-appointed Peter Mourer to serve as the non- voting agency representative to the Kent Human Services Commission. Mr. Mourer' s second year term will be in effect on February 2 , 1990 and continue until December 31, 1990. I submit this for your confirmation. DK:jb cc: Ed Chow, City Administrator Marie Jensen, City Clerk Human Service Commission Members Jim Harris, Planning Director MEMORANDUM TO: JUDY WOODS, CITY COUNCIL PRESIDENT CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR�� DATE: JANUARY 23 , 1990 \\1\\1 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF COLLEEN MILLER TO THE KENT PLANNING COMMISSION I have recently appointed Colleen Miller to the Kent Planning Commission. Ms. Miller is an attorney with the Pierce County Department of Assigned Council . She is a Public Defender who works exclusively with juveniles dependency cases. She has been very active in regard to water and sewer issues and served on the King County Women' s Advisory Board for 3 years. Ms. Miller will replace Gabriella Uhlar-Heffner, who resigned. Her term will become effective upon confirmation and continue until 12/31/91. I submit this for your confirmation. DK:jb cc: Ed Chow, City Administrator Marie Jensen, City Clerk Planning Commission Members Jim Harris, Planning Director Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: — PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCIES 2 . SUMMARY S EMENT: As recommended by the Operations Committees thorization to renew the Interlocal Service Agreement with King County for two years for licensing and enforcement of City Ordinances pertaining to private security agencies and individual guards, 'j 3 . EXHIBITS: Copy agreement 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: City lerk Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, ftaminer, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO \ YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3F 3F King County General Services Division Animal, Business,Marriage License Section Department of Executive Administration 403 King County Administration Bldg. 500 Fourth Avenue Seattle,Washington 98104 (206)296-3504 December 27 , 1989 Ms . Marie Jensen �� City Clerk'' City of Kent ` T 220 4th Avenue South �' � i .,J P Kent , WA 98032-5839 �� , Dear Ms . Jensen : Enclosed is a proposed Interlocal Service Agreement for services relating to the licensing and enforcement of your city ordinance pertaining to private security agencies and private security registrants . We welcome any comments or suggestions about our services or any questions you may have regarding the enclosed agreement . Please return to the original and all three copies of this agreement to us . We will process the agreement for the Executive ' s signature and return to you a fully executed copy . We look forward to performing our services in your city and the continuation of our working relationship . Sincerely, cfx Jane Hague , Interim Manager King County General Services Division J H : T D : t I CGBLJENI ( CG . 2 ) Enclosure cc : Terry A . Denend , Supervisor , Business Licenses Section PRIVATE SECURITY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day 1 of 19 , between KING COUNTY, State of 2 3 Washington , hereinafter called the "County, " and the CITY OF 4 KENT, Washington, a non-charter code city, hereinafter called the 5 "City, " under authority of Title 39, 1tcvised Code of Washington, 6 and particularly RCW 39.34.080, King County Ordinance No. 1888, and CITY OF KENT Ordinance No. 2387. 7 WITNESSETH: 8 9 WHEREAS, the County and the City have jurisdiction to 10 'regulate the activities of private security personnel including, 11 but not by way of limitation, private guards, merchant patrolmen, 12 and detectives within their respective boundaries; and 13 WHEREAS, the business of private security presents 14 peculiar licensing and law enforcement problems of a multi- 15 jurisdictional nature; and 16 WHEREAS, it is desirable in order to adequately protect 17 the interests of the County and the City, and the citizens thereof, 18 to provide for a uniform County-wide system of licensing such 19 private security activities and the persons therein engaged; and 20 WHEREAS, the County and its employees and more par- 21 ticularly the Business License Section, Division of General 22 Services, Department of Executive Administration, are well 23 qualified and able in matters relating to the licensing and 24 enforcement of laws relating to the conduct of the private 25 security business; and 26 WHEREAS, the City desires to obtain the assistance of 27 the County in matters relating to the licensing and enforcement 28 of laws relating to the conduct of the private security business 29 and the persons engaged in such activities; and 30 31 32 -1- 33 i 1 WHEREAS, the County is ready, willing and able to act 2 to assist the City in matters relating to the licensing and i 3 enforcement of such laws. 4 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of payments, mutual 5 agreements and covenants hereinafter contained and subject to the 6 terms and conditions hereinafter stated, it is hereby understood 7 and agreed by the parties hereto as follows: 8 1. The City has enacted and shall amend from time to 9 time Ordinance No. 2387, which is substantially similar to King 10 County Code Chapter 6.24, as now or hereafter amended. 11 2. The City shall delegate the power to determine eli- 12 gibility for licenses issued under the terms of the above men- 13 tioned City Ordinance to the Director of the King County 14 Department of Executive Administration and their authorized 15 representatives subject to the conditions set forth in the above 16 mentioned City Ordinance and subject to the review power of the 17 King County Board of Appeals. 18 3. The City shall delegate the power to enforce the I 19 terms of the above mentioned City Oruinance including the power i 20 ito deny, suspend or revoke licenses issued thereunder, to the 21 !Director of King County Department of Executive Administration 22 and their authorized representatives subject to the conditions 23 set forth in the above mentioned City Ordinance and subject to 24 the review power of the King County Board of Appeals. The power 25 and duty to issue notices of violation and court citations for 26 violations of the above mentioned City ordinance shall be jointly 27 exercised by the Director of the King County Department of 28 xecutive Administration and their authorized representatives and 29 the CITY OF KENT. Not withstanding the fact that any 30 isdemeanor complaint filed or misdemeanor citation issued by the 31 ing County in the performance of its responsibilities under this �I 32 33 -2- I Contract will allege a violation of the above mentioned 2 Kent Ordinance, such complaint or citation shall be issued in the 3 name of and prosecuted by and on behalf of the State of 4 Washington. All fines and forfeitures resulting from such County 5 initiated prosecutions shall belong to King County. 6 4. The County shall perform, to the best of its ability, 7 all services relating to licensing and enforcement of City 8 Ordinance relating to private security activities and the persons 9 conducting same and the above mentioned City Ordinance. Except 10 as otherwise hereinafter provided for, the minimum level of 11 service which will be provided shall be the same minimum level of 12 service that is and shall be hereinafter during the terms of this 13 agreement provided for the unincorporated areas of the County by 14 the aforementioned King County Department of Executive 15 Administration. 16 5. The rendition of such services, the standards of per- 17 formance, the discipline of employees and all other matters 18 incident to the performance of such services and the control of 19 personnel so employed shall remain in the County. In the event 20 of a dispute between the parties as to the extent of the services I 21 to be rendered hereunder, or the minimum level of manner of I 22 performance of such service, the determination of the Director of 23 the King County Department of Executive Administration shall 24 prevail unless within ten days of such determination made in 25 writing, the City files a written notice of appeal with the 26 Director. Copies of such notice shall also be filed with the 27 King County Executive and the City Manager of Kent. In such 28 event, the dispute shall then be submitted for review to 29 a three member panel composed of the County Executive, the City 30 Manager and a third member of their choosing who shall not be an 31 officer or employee of either King County or the City of 32 33 -3_ '! II 1 Kent. A decision or determination agreed upon by a majority of 2 said panel shall be final and conclusive in all respects as 3 between the parties hereto. I 4 6. The City agrees that all fees collected by the 5 County pursuant to the licensing and registration of private 6 security persons shall be and remain the property of the County I 7 subject to the provisions of Clause 7 of this contract. I 8 7. The County shall pay over to the City on a yearly 9 basis the sum of: 10 a. $50.00 for each Class A License issued to an I 11 agency having its principal office in the City; 12 b. $50.00 for each Class B License issued to an 13 agency having its principal office in the City; ; 14 C. $83.33 for each Class C License issued to an 15 agency having its principal office in the City; 16 8. The parties agree that all fines levied by a court 17 of competent jurisdiction for violation of the City ordinance I 18 subject to this agreement shall become the property of King 19 County unless the Complaint or Citation issued for such violation 20 was issued by the City of Kent. 21 9. All liabilities for salaries, wages, and other 22 compensation, injury, sickness, liability to the public for 23 intentional or negligent acts or any other liability arising from 24 the performance of the King County Business License Section 25 hereunder shall be that of the County. To such purpose, the 26 County shall save the City harmless from any liability arising 27 rom performance of the King County Business License Section. 28 10. Neither party, its officers or employees shall 29 ssume any liability for the intentional or negligent acts of the 30 �ther party or any of its officers or employees. As to the 31 bligations and responsibilities assumed by or allocated to each 32 33 -4- 1 party pursuant to this agreement, said parties shall secure and 2 maintain with responsible insurers such insurance as is 3 customarily maintained by public bodies with respect to the 4 operation and enforcement of the Government Services being the 5 subject matter of this contract and the incidents thereto, all to 6 the extent that such insurance can be secured and maintained at 7 reasonable cost. Upon request, each party shall make available 6 to the other party a certificate of such insurance when in force. 9 11. Either party shall have the right to cancel this 10 agreement at any time upon the giving of 30 days written notice 11 to the other of such cancellation. In the event of such 12 cancellation, all monies allocated under this Agreement shall 13 become immediately due and payable. The cancellation of this 14 Agreement shall not affect the validity of any license issued 15 pursuant to City Ordinance No. 2387 as now or hereafter amended. 16 12. Unless sooner terminated as provided for herein, 17 Ithis agreement shall be effective January 1, 1990 and shall 18 terminate on December 31, 1991. It is further agreed that should 19 ter- both parties desire to continue this Agreement after said 20 mination date, this Contract may be renewed for the period of one I 21 year on the same terms and conditions upon the giving of written 22 notice by either party to the other not less than 30 days before I 23 the expiration of this Agreement. 24 13. This writing embodies the whole agreement of the 25 parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions or obligations � i 26 other than those contained herein. The parties further agree 27 that no liability shall attach to either of the parties by reason 28 of entering into this contract except as expressly provided 29 therein. 30 31 32 33 -5- i 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this 2 agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove 3 written. 4 5 KING COUNTY CITY OF KENT 6 BY BY 7 County Executive City Mayor 8 9 ATTEST: 10 11 Director 12 Department of Executive Administration 13 14 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 15 16 Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Deputy City Attorney 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 OPSKENI(CO.3 ) 33 -6- Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 1990 CITY ART PLAN 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Approva the 1990 City Art Plan which outlines public art projects in general terms for 1990 through 1994 and lists specific projects for 1990. 1990 projects include the Mural Partnership Program for downtown Kent, artwork at the new fire stations, a sculpture for the new library, City art collection purchases and a Miniature Golf Art Design Team Project. 3 . EXHIBITS: 1990 City Art Plan 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks,, Co ittee Kent Arts Commission,. Staff (Committee, Staff,' Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAtL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $144 998 SOURCE OF FUNDS: 1990 City Art Fund and carry over funds from previous years 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3G 3G, KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1990 CITY ART PLAN ESTIMATED PROJECTS COST Mural Partnership Program $ 10,000 Public Safety Buildings 55,000 Kent Library Sculpture 33,000 City Artwork Collection Purchase 3,000 Miniature Golf Art Design Team Project 9,395 Subtotal $1105395 OTHER EXPENSES Maintenance/Contingency $ 4,700 Administration 22, 103 Supplies and Subsistence 1 ,500 Artist Design Fee and Honorariums 5,000 Postage and Printing 1,300 Total $144,998 1824R-29R KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1990 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Mural Partnership Program Project Description: Inauguration of a program whereby new murals are painted in the downtown area through partnerships between the City and local businesses. The Arts Commission will manage mural projects with businesses and/or downtown building owners who: * provide a funding match for the project. * renovate their buildings and/or keep their buildings in excellent repair. Long term wall lease agreements will be signed with building owners. The murals will be designed by artists and painted on the buildings by sign companies. The original artwork will become part of Kent's portable works collection. When feasible, the artwork will be depicted on a commemorative poster for Canterbury Faire. Estimated Costs: 1990 Total $10,000 $10,000 Funding Sources: City Art Fund Background: Kent is home to several downtown murals . Murals are both pedestrian and auto oriented; they can be viewed from an auto but by placing a group of murals within walking distance, pedestrian traffic is created. Factors Supporting Project: 1 . New murals will enhance downtown and create foot traffic in the area. 2. Depiction of the work on the Canterbury Faire Poster will promote the mural and Kent downtown as well as the Canterbury Faire. 3. The Mural Partnership Program will provide incentive for downtown building owners to keep their buildings in good repair . 1824R-29R KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1990 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Public Safety Buildings Project Description: Professional artists will create original artworks for each new fire station: East Hill Station - stained glass, banners, or hanging sculpture will be added to parts of the entry area windows and windows facing the street. West Hill Station - outdoor sculpture. Northend Industrial Station - outdoor sculpture. Downtown Station - indoor painting. Estimated Costs: carryover 1990 Total $40,000 $15,000 $55,000 Funding Sources: City Art Fund Background: The City is constructing three new public safety buildings and engaging in major renovation of a fourth station. Factors Supporting Project: 1 . The projects will enhance and humanize the facilities. 2. The projects will unite facilities with their neighborhoods, with each other and with other public buildings in Kent. 3. Artworks will add to the value of the facilities and present a positive and professional image to the surrounding neighborhoods. 1824R-29R KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1990 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Kent Library Sculpture Project Project Description: An important sculpture to be located near the entrance of the new Kent Library. The sculpture will also be an interesting and important addition to Second Avenue. Estimated Costs: carryover 1990 Total $26,500 $6, 500 $33,000 Funding Sources: City Art Fund Background: Kent is currently building a new Library with King County. The new building is sited downtown and will create a pedestrian friendly atmosphere on Second Avenue. Factors Supporting Project: 1 . The piece will greatly enhance the Kent downtown area. 2. The Library is heavily used by Kent' s citizens ; the artwork will have many viewers and is likely to become a landmark. 3. The artwork includes seating areas. 4. The artwork is a dynamic announcement of the value Kent places on the Library. 1824R-29R KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1990 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: City Artwork Collection Purchases Canterbury Faire Juried Show and/or Other Regional Juried Show Project Description: Purchase of significant interior movable artworks from the Kent Canterbury Faire Juried Fine Art Show and/or other regional juried art shows. The artworks will be hung in public areas of Kent public buildings. Estimated Costs: 1990 Total $3,000 $3,000 Funding Sources: City Art Fund Background: The City of Kent Arts Commission has established a collection of movable artworks that include paintings, prints, weavings, and other works. The continuing expansion of City office space has increased the demand for portable artworks for public areas. Factors Supporting Project: 1 . Artworks in public areas contribute to a successful and positive city image. 2. Visual artworks truly enhance public spaces . 1824R-29R KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION 1990 CITY ART PLAN Project Title: Miniature Golf Course Art Design Team Project Project Description: Hire an artist or team of artists to completely remodel the mini putt-putt course. Each artist would design a different hole. Estimated Costs: 1990 Total $9,395* $18, 790 Funding Sources: *City Art Fund, Revenue from mini putt putt and sponsor- ships. Background: The mini putt putt at Riverbend Golf Complex is in need of enhancement. Factors Supporting Project: 1. Similar temporary projects in Seattle and Los Angeles have received national attention and much participation. 2. According to the Wall Street Journal , Time and other sources, miniature golf is experiencing the biggest revival since it began in the 1920's . More than 50,000,000 played miniature golf last year. 3. Art at the mini putt putt would be experienced by Kent families . 1824R-29R KENT PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENT ARTS COMMISSION CITY ART PLAN 1990-1994 Projects Cost 1990 Mural Partnership Program $ 10,000 Public Safety Buildings 55,000 Kent Library/Centennial 33,000 City Artwork Collection Purchases 3,000 Miniature Golf Art Design Team Project 9,395 Administrative Costs 24,903 Maintenance/Contingency 4,700 $144,998 YEAR TOTAL 1991 *Burlington Depot/Downtown Artist Designed Enhancements (banners, street furniture, hatch covers, etc. ) $ 18,000 Old Fishing Hole Project 12,000 City Artwork Collection Purchases 3,000 Mural Partnership Program 7,000 Administrative Costs and Maintenance/Contingency 30,000 APPROXIMATE $ 70,000 YEAR TOTAL *Please note: Many of the practical items designed by artists for these projects will be repeatable so that in subsequent years multiples can be made at a very reasonable cost and used in parks and public areas throughout Kent. 1992 Mural Partnership $ 7,000 City Artwork Collection 3,000 *Neighborhood Parks Artist Designed Enhancements (seating, sundials, drinking fountains, etc. ) 22,000 East Hill Park Artwork (carry over) 8,000 Administration/Maintenance/Contingency 30,000 APPROXIMATE $ 70,000 YEAR TOTAL 1824R-29R 1993 Mural Partnership $ 7,000 City Artwork Collection 3,000 Performing Arts Center 23,000 East Hill Park Artwork 7,000 (15,000 project) Administration/Maintenance/Contingency 30,000 APPROXIMATE $ 70,000 YEAR TOTAL 1994 Mural Partnership $ 7,000 City Artwork Collection 3,000 Green River Trail Artworks 20,000 Performance Arts Center (33,000 project) 10,000 Administration/Maintenance/Contingency 30,000 APPROXIMATE $ 70,000 YEAR TOTAL 1824R-29R Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6 1990 1 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: As recommended by the Operations Committee, uthorizationfor the Mayor to sign anreement with -#fie A & M levator, Inc. to extend our service co ract for maintenance of elevators in City Hall. 3 . EXHIBITS: Contract Extension with A & M Elevator Inc. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: O erations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO > YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ — SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3H D � � �' � TO: Mayor & City Council I' EB Q 1 1990 CITY OF €<E[',,T FROM: Tony McCarthy CITY CLFPI Finance Director SUBJECT: A & M Elevator Service We presently have a contract for elevator services with A & M Elevator Service, Inc. The present contract ends December 31, 1989 . Services and payments listed below: City Hall $ 186. 00 monthly Purchasing staff has a total of 13 contracts to review and recommend action annually. During 1990 we would like to begin to stagger these contracts on a quarterly basis. This will allow the purchasing staff to analyze the various vendors quotes and make the appropriate recommendations to the council . We are recommending that this contract be extended through June 30, 1990 and requesting authorization for the Mayor to sign the extension. Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LID 300 PAYOFF 2 . SUMMARY STA TEMENT: L_ As recommended._hy._..the Operations Committee, uthorization for an early pay-off of LID 300. Early payoff is recommended because of differential between the amount that the City is paying in interest expense on the LID and the amount currently earned on City inve$tw t. Also the item is being recommended because cy, strong economic growth in the last half of 1989 has provided additional funds in the Capital Improvement Program making a cash payoff possible. Even with this payoff additional CIP funds above what was included in the original CIP are available for other purposes. 3 . EXHIBITS: 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: IBC and Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PER80NNEL IMPACT: NO YES X FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ � Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $162r603i//V� SOURCE OF FUNDS : Capital Improvement Fund 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3I I; MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- Subject: LID 300 - FISCAL NOTE C ator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 01/31/90 at 1112 . THE EARLY RETIREMENT OF THE CITY'S SHARE OF LID 300, THE CROW ROAD LID, WILL COST THE CITY AN ADDITIONAL $1621603 IN 1990 BUT WILL SAVE $49, 073 IN INTEREST EXPENSE BETWEEN 1991 AND 1995. THE LID CARRIES AN INTEREST RATE OF 10 . 06%. THE CITY CURRENTLY EARNS BETWEEN 8 AND 9 PERCENT ON ITS INVESTMENTS. BECAUSE OF THE DIFFERENTIAL IN INTEREST RATES IT MAKES ECONOMIC SENSE TO PREPAY THE LID ASSUMING AVAILABLE CASH FOR SUCH PAYMENT. BECAUSE OF STRONG ECONOMIC GROWTH THE LAST HALF OF 1989 FOLLOWING THE ADOPTION OF THE 1990-1994 CIP IN JUNE OF 1989 , EXCESS CIP FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE FOR EARLY RETIREMENT. EVEN WITH EARLY RETIREMENT, THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND HAS A PROJECTED 1990 ENDING FUND BALANCE OF APPROXIMATELY $800, 000 INCLUDING THE $450, 000 IN THE FUND RESERVE. EARLY RETIREMENT ALSO FREES UP AN AVERAGE OF $42, 000 PER YEAR FOR 1991 THROUGH 1995 FOR OTHER CIP ALLOCATIONS. Sity of Kent Payoff of LID 300 Interest rate 10.06% oue February 15, 1990 Scheduled Payments Lost Gained opportunity __________________________________ Payoff Gain Interest Interest Gain Principal Interest Total Amount (Loss) 8.20% 8.20% (Loss) 1990 32,521.00 19,630.00 52,151.00 214,754.00 (162,603.00) (13,333.45) (175,936.45) 1991 32,521,00 16,357.86 48,878.86 48,878.86 (14,426.79) 4,008.07 38,460.14 1992 32,521.00 13,086.25 45,607.25 45,607.25 (15,609.79) 8,076.52 38,073.99 1993 32,521.00 9,814.64 42,335.64 42,335.64 (16,889.79) 12,210.32 37,656.17 1994 32,521.00 6,543.02 39,064.02 39,064.02 (18,274.75) 16,414.82 37,204.09 1995 32,519.00 3,271.41 35,790.41 35,790.41 (19,773.28) 20,695.64 36,712.78 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 195,124.00 68,703.18 263,827.18 214,754.00 49,073.18 (98,307.84) 61,405.37 12,170.71 Interest savings (90-93) 49,073.18 Normal payment 52,151.00 Payoff amount 214,754.00 Additional need 162,603.00 Principal (90-93) CITY OF KENT EXHIBIT G CURRENT O1GET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST December 31, 10 STREET AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS 1989 ------ -------------- 1990 1990 Adjustments Estimated Final Estimated Budget Fav (Unfav) Actual Budget Actual --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RLUEN.ES Taxes: 2 �1,g66 204,245 * 2,541,711 2,518,331 2,518,831 Sales Real estate excise 250,000 495,475 x 745,475 3`A,000 350,000 Intergoverrnental revenue: Motor vehicle fuel tax 654,117 43,877 x 697,994 705,482 705,482 113,933 137,358 90,E 21,,588 88 Interest 21,50N Miscellaneous revenue 19,798 19,1Yd --------- --------- TOTAL R.EVEHFS 3,375,214 743,597 4,142,336 3,685,901 3,685,901 .oY. EXFE DITURES (TRANSFERS) Debt service 2,026,199 10,250 x 2,017,949 2,342,693 2,342,693 Capital o ects. 1,416,000 1,416,000 Pr J HUI&Meeker Corner Int 110,000 110,000 016 Imp. - U.P.R.R. 100,000 100,000 EW 192nd - 18M 150,000 150,00) 96000 Canyon Drive Imp 95,000 ' James Street Rail Road Crossing 46,000 48'C60 Green River Bridge @ Central 85,211 65,211 Parks and paths 3,270 3,270 3,527 3,527 50,000 Transportation Mitigation Miscellaneous Road Adjustments 66,385 (115,870)m 182,255 260,000 196th Land Acquisition H 7 est Hill/East Hill Parks 100,000 00, 0 Old Library Remodel 700.E �'00� Hest Hill Fire Station 137,574 137,574 Shops Remodel 63,000 63,000 Wmputer Systems 220,000 220,000 --------- --------- TOTAL E)FEENDITURES (TRANSFERS) 3,906,639 47,650 3,8'S•3,989 3,762,220 4,072,220 IMCREASE (DECREASE) IN FUND BALANCE (531,425) 695,947 293,347 (76,319) (386,319) BEGINNING FL HD BALANCE 667,218 442,524 1,109,742 M,342 1,3G3,089 ENDING FUND BALANCE Reserved for Capital Expenditures 450,000 450,000 45U,000 450,D00 Unreserved but designated for: 50,000 Street-Transportation Mitigation Capital Improvements-196th Land Acq 260,000 nreserved: (314,207) "9,023 86 115,710 36,5 Strcet Capital Improvements 5------17,37g ------- --------- --------- - ------- --------- --------- 135,793 1,139,471 1,393,ON 809,023 1,005,770 w Changes from last month OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES November 1, 1989 COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Christi Houser Paul Mann Steve Dowell STAFF PRESENT: Ed Chow Jim Hansen Mike Webby Sandra Driscoll Ron Spang Tony McCarthy Alana McIalwain May Miller Priscilla Shea Tom Vetsch GUEST PRESENT: Anita Methvin, Citizen APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS All claims for the period ending November 1, 1989 in the amount of $1, 191, 811. 59 were approved for payment. LID 301/300 PAYOFF Finance Director McCarthy presented to the Committee a proposal to retire outstanding debt on City owned property in LID 300 and 301 due to lower current investment interest rates of 7 . 8% and an available fund balance in the Capital Improvement Fund. The City has $252 , 433 in outstanding debt on these LID's and available CIP funds by over collection of sales tax and real estate excise tax. McCarthy further stated that the City is currently paying an interest rate of 10. 35% on LID 301 and the additional amount needed for payoff is $89 , 830 due November 15, 1989 . LID 300 has an interest rate of 10 . 06% and the additional amount needed for payoff is $162 , 603 due February 15, 1990. — It was recommended to the Council to payoff LID 301 in 1969 creating a 1990 budget savings of $83 , 906 . 41 and postpone LID 300 payoff until 1990. The Committee recommended this proposal to Council by a vote of 3-0. ROUND OFF PROGRAM Finance Director McCarthy presented Anita Methvin a friend of the Mayor at the City of Vienna, West Virginia where they are currently accepting rounded up utility payments and using the extra funds for a Parks Department program. McCarthy noted that handling this type of program internally would be more difficult than in Vienna because the City uses lockbox processing for its utility bills. In this process the actual utility bill payments are sent to the 1' JKent city Council Meeting al Y Date February 6 1990 \\ Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: VENTURE FUND AUTHORIZATION 2 . SUMMARY STA'E TT: Approval of use of Venture Funds in the amount of"$11444, for Parks employee Becky Giles, as recommended by the IBC'a-t&-by the Operations Committee at their February 1, 1990 meeting, to attend a Swimming Pool and Aquatics Conference in Phoenix between March 1 and March 7 . This item is a venture fund request because the City currently does not operate a swimming facility but has been asked many times to consider taking over the Forward Thrust Pool at Kent-Meridian High School. Staff feels it is appropriate that an individual on the City staff be aware of what is involved in aquatics management. 3 . EXHIBITS: 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Park Department IBC and scheduled for approval bV the Operations Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT_ NO YES X FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended 7 �1 Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: <$1 144 SOURCE OF FUNDS : Ventube nd which has a $10 , 000 budget 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3J MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- Subject: AQUATICS MANAGEMENT VENTURE FUND REQUEST - FISCAL NOTE r ator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 01/23/90 at 1741. $1, 144 HAS BEEN REQUESTED FROM A VENTURE FUND BUDGET OF $10, 000 TO ATTEND A NATIONAL SWIMMING POOL & AQUATIC CONFERENCE IN PHEONIX BETWEEN MARCH 1 AND 7 . THE REQUEST IS A VENTURE FUND REQUEST BECAUSE THE CITY DOES NOT NOW OPERATE A SWIMMING FACILITY OR OFFER SWIMMING PROGRAMS, BUT HAS OVER THE YEARS BEEN REQUESTED BY KING COUNTY TO CONSIDER THE TRANSFER. IF SUCH A TRANSFER WAS TO COME ABOUT, IT WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR CITY STAFF TO HAVE SOME KNOWLEDGE OF SWIMMING POOL OPERATIONS. THE IBC THEREFORE RECCOMMENDS THIS EXPENDITURE TO A MAXIMUM OF $1, 144 FROM THE VENTURE FUND. EXPENDITURES ABOVE THIS LEVEL MUST BE CHARGED TO THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET. �nf Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LID 328 - WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENTS PHASE I 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept as complete the contract with Gary Merlino Construction Company for Phase I of LID 328 - West Valley Highway Improvements and release of retainage after receipt of releases from the State. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from the Director of Public Works 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3K DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS February 1, 1990 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom & RE: LID 328 Phase I West Valley Highway Improvements (Ditch Construction) The project was awarded to Gary Merlino Construction on August 15, 1989 for the bid amount of $249 , 667. 50. Notice to proceed was given on August 24 , 1989 . The project consisted of ditch construction along West Valley Highway south of S. 216th; between S. 212th and S. 204th Streets; at S. 200th Street; and in the vicinity of 64th Avenue S. and S. 216th Street. The final contract cost is $272 , 462 . 56. It is recommended the project be accepted as complete and retainage released when the State releases are received. Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1 . SUBJECT: 11"!3 ASPHALT OVERLAYS -OVE-RLAYS - PHASE I- 1985- Y5 - PHASE I'I 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept as complete the contracts with M.A. Segale for the 1988 Phase I and Phase II asphalt overlays and the 1989 asphalt overlay projects and release of retainage after receipt of releases from the State. 3 . EXHIBITS: '!Memorandum from the Director of Public Works 4 . RECOMMENDED BY Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NO E: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE RE U�D: `$ N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS' 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3L DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS February 1, 1990 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom bd RE: 1989 Asphalt Overlays The contract for this project was awarded to M.A. Segale, Inc. on June 6, 1989 for the bid amount of $193 , 275. 80. Construction began in July and was completed in December of 1989 . The project consisted of overlays for several streets in the Linda Heights, Green Valley Heights, Cambridge and East Hill areas as well as S . 212th Street at 42nd Avenue S. The final contract cost is $202 , 046. 83 . It is recommended the contract be accepted as complete and the retainage released after releases are received from the State. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS February 1, 1990 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom Td RE: 1988 Asphalt Overlays Phase I The contract for this project was awarded to M.A. Segale, Inc. on August 2 , 1988 for the bid amount of $112 , 900. 10. Construction began in September of 1988 . The project consisted of overlays for 46th Avenue S. (S. 272nd to Carnaby Way) ; S . 262nd Street (33rd Avenue to 42nd Avenue) ; Valley Place (Hazel to dead end) ; Pioneer Street (Central Ave to Kennebeck) ; Meeker Street (B.N. Railroad to Central Avenue) ; Lincoln Avenue (James Street to Smith Street) ; 45th Avenue (S . 254th Street to S. 256th Street) ; S . 256th Street (45th Avenue east) ; and 94th Avenue S . (James Street north for 650 feet) . The final contract cost is $132 , 088. 64 . It is recommended the contract be accepted as complete and the retainage released after releases are received from the State. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS February 1, 1990 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom�,r � l RE: 1988 Asphalt Overlays Phase II The contract for this project was awarded to M.A. Segale, Inc. on October 4 , 1988 for the bid amount of $207 , 568 . 10. Due to weather, construction did not begin until April of 1989 and was completed in December. The project consisted of overlays for 68th Avenue S. between 189th and 180th Streets; 4th Avenue S. from Willis to Gowe; S . 252nd Street from Pacific Highway to 25th Avenue S. ; and S. 208th Street from 84th Avenue South easterly for approximately 1630 feet. The final contract cost is $203 , 354 . 45. It is recommended the contract be accepted as complete and the retainage released after releases are received from the State. Kent City Council Meeting «YY`` Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: AT&T BUILDING 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of the bill of sale and warranty agreement for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 556 feet of sanitary sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of 23188 68th Ave. So. and release of cash bond after expiration of the one year period. 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: �taff (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A _ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3M � sir { I AT&T P.O.P. BLDG „`. � TN { Fil Nor , ST L •_' � Mt s.tiZ l r, raw► ' �. �'p''{�'}� ► kit � z : •Z� h a Sr x w PtGo $MIT Q s.t '"ARMST 171 { d' T w Kent City Council Meeting Jj ti� Date February 6 , 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: �REso 110IT-o° CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY TffRMi7T 2 . SUMMARY STA MENT: ._.As approved by the Public Works Committee, option of Resolution No. superseding Resolution No. 1131 and providing that conveyance of real property through deed and/or dedication to the City should be free and clear of encumbrances subject to the discretion of affected department} 3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution and excerpt from Public Works Committee meeting of 1/30/90 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION• — Council Agenda Item No. 3N PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 30, 1990 PRESENT: STEVE DOWELL JIM HANSEN LEONA ORR ED WHITE DON WICKSTROM RON FERNLEY GARY GILL BILL WILLIAMSON SIGNATURE POINTE EAST Wickstrom reviewed that the SEPA review of this project required a traffic study to determine how they would exit out of the development without causing further traffic congestion. A traffic plan was developed. The plan was to restrict the new apartment complex to only right in and right out. In order to go north they would have to go turn right (south) on Washington Avenue, cross the bridge and make a u-turn in the designated area and return north. This plan still allows the office complex a right in and left out by special curbing. A letter was forwarded to the property owners and tenants in the area asking for their comments on this plan. Also sent therewith were other traffic plans depicting what future traffic revisions they can expect upon additional development within the area. We received a variety of responses. We will send another letter to those originally contacted indicating that we are proceeding with the original plan as described above and offer that if they have further concerns we can place it on the Public Works Committee agenda for further discussion. Orr asked how much of the Signature Pointe complex would have access to the road. Wickstrom commented the entire complex would have and they are also designing the complex so they also exit out to 64th as well. The Hawley road access gives them a second access in case of emergency. Wickstrom stated he felt this was the best option available in terms of minimizing the impact on the existing development. Williamson stated his office received a call from Dean S. Johnson who is an attorney in the office complex on Hawley Road indicating he wanted to meet with the Committee on this item. It was noted his response indicated he preferred the original plan. Williamson noted that Mr. Johnson was concerned about the costs. Wickstrom confirmed there would be no cost to the property owners unless an LID were formed for the signal. The improvements planned in Option A would be paid for by the developer. RESOLUTION - CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY THROUGH DEED OR DEDICATION Wickstrom explained that our existing resolution requires that all conveyances of real property to the city by deed or dedication must be free of all encumbrances. We have found this requirement almost impossible to comply with and it is recommended the resolution be JANUARY 30, 1990 PAGE 2 changed such that the affected department have the discretion of accepting the deeds. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution accomplishing same. ORDINANCE - SIDE SEWER REPAIR. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY Wickstrom explained we are clarifying the ordinance dealing with side sewers. The practice has been that the property owner is responsible for the entire side sewer from his house to the main and there was a question when this occurred in public right of way. The nrAinanre is 7-.e11, re,ri cc,i }- Aur- - ..,,,.---,..}.. �•_,.,,.� RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, providing that conveyance of real property through deed and/or dedication to the City should be free and clear of encumbrances subject to discretion of affected department head. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Resolution No. 1131 is hereby repealed. Section 2. Real property deeded and/or dedicated as part of any subdivision or a public improvement requirement shall be conveyed to the City free and clear of all encumbrances, subject to the discretion of the department head of the department affected by the said deed or dedication. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this _ day of . 1990. Concurred in by the Mayor of the city of Kent, this day of 1990. FAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Resolution No. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, the day of 1990. (SEAL) MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK 8030-280 w Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: or-ASBeS-15� 116TH AVE. S.E. SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION 2 . SUMMARY STA MENT: recommended by the Public Works Committee, uthorization to establish a charge in lieu of assessment for future connections to sanitary sewer main constructed by the City on the Fire Training Center on 116th Ave. S .E. 3 . EXHIBITS: Excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A SOURCE OF FUNDS• 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 30 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 30, 1990 PAGE 2 changed such that the affected department have the discretion of accepting the deeds. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution accomplishing same. ORDINANCE - SIDE SEWER REPAIR. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY Wickstrom explained we are clarifying the ordinance dealing with side sewers. The practice has been that the property owner is responsible for the entire side sewer from his house to the main and there was a question when this occurred in public right of way. The ordinance is being revised to denote that the property owner is responsible for the side sewer even if it falls within public right of way. Orr asked if the property owner was allowed to hire his own contractor to do any required repairs. It was confirmed the property owner has that right. When it is in public right of way he has to hire a licensed contractor but when it is private property he can do it himself if he chooses. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance. --� CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT - 116TH AVENUE S.E. SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Wickstrom explained this sewer main was constructed for the Fire Training Center in the vicinity of 116th Avenue S.E. and S. 248th and was funded by the G.O. Bond issue. In order to get reimbursed when properties connect in the future, we are proposing to establish a charge ` in lieu of assessment upon connection. Wickstrom explained the map in the packet indicated what the cost would be to each property if they connected. Wickstrom clarified for Dowell these were very good rates for sewer connection. The Committee unanimously approved establishing the charge in lieu of assessment for future connection to the sanitary sewer main. PARKING ORDINANCE - POLICE AND FIRE VEHICLES Wickstrom stated the purpose of this ordinance is to restrict parking on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth to police and fire vehicles only during construction of the Centennial Building. Jim Hansen stated this would allow quick access to these vehicles in event of an emergency and secondly, there is concern about security of the vehicles if they are parked a distance from City hall . Dowell asked if there were any residences being affected by this. Hansen replied there are no residences in the area but the greatest concern has been the public ' s access to' City buildings, and the merchants concerns about parking for their customers. Hansen I }�N Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: SIDE SEWER REPAIR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Az- recommended by the Public Works Committee, doption of Ordinance No. if9 denoting that \ responsibility for the repair maintenance and operation of a 1 side sewer is that of the property owner even if it falls within J public right-of-way. 3 . EXHIBITS: Excerpt from the Public Works Committee minutes, copy of the proposed ordinance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ N/A _ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3P -Svo PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 30, 1990 PAGE 2 changed such that the affected department have the discretion of accepting the deeds. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution accomplishing same. -� ORDINANCE - SIDE SEWER REPAIR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY Wickstrom explained we are clarifying the ordinance dealing with side sewers. The practice has been that the property owner is responsible for the entire side sewer from his house to the main and there was a question when this occurred in public right of way. The ordinance is being revised to denote that the property owner is responsible for the side sewer even if it falls within public right of way. Orr asked if the property owner was allowed to hire his own contractor to do any required repairs. It was confirmed the property owner has that right. When it is in public right of way he has to hire a licensed contractor but when it is private property he can do it himself if he chooses. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance. CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT - 116TH AVENUE S.E. SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Wickstrom explained this sewer main was constructed for the Fire Training Center in the vicinity of 116th Avenue S.E. and S. 248th and was funded by the G.O. Bond issue. In order to get reimbursed when properties connect in the future, we are proposing to establish a charge ' in lieu of assessment upon connection. Wickstrom explained the map in the packet indicated what the cost would be to each property if they connected. Wickstrom clarified for Dowell these were very good rates for sewer connection. The Committee unanimously approved establishing the charge in lieu of assessment for future connection to the sanitary sewer main. PARKING ORDINANCE - POLICE AND FIRE VEHICLES Wickstrom stated the purpose of this ordinance is to restrict parking on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth to police and fire vehicles only during construction of the Centennial Building. Jim Hansen stated this would allow quick access to these vehicles in event of an emergency and secondly, there is concern about security of the vehicles if they are parked a distance from City hall . Dowell asked if there were any residences being affected by this. Hansen replied there are no residences in the area but the greatest concern has been the public 's access to City buildings, and the merchants concerns about parking for their customers. Hansen sp I I� ORDINANCE NO. _ AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, clarifying responsibility for sanitary side sewer repair, maintenance and operation for systems located in City rights of way and upon private property. i WHEREAS, the City of Kent maintains a combined utility system under KCC Chapter 7.03 and RCW Chapter 35.67, RCW Chapter 35.92 and RCW Chapter 35A.80 denominated as a system of sewerage; i and WHEREAS, under KCC Chapter 7.05, the City regulates and operates a system of sewerage, including private connections with ) the public sewer system; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to clarify requirements for private sites with connections to the public sewer system; iNOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. KCC Chapter 7.05 relating to sanitary sewers is amended as follows: CHAPTER 7.05 SANITARY SEWERS 7.05.010. PURPOSE--CONSTRUCTION. This Chapter shall be deemed an exercise of the police power of the State of Washington, and of the City of Kent and is deemed expedient to maintain the peace, good government and welfare of said City and its trade, commerce, and manufactures, and to insure greater protection to life and health and all of its provisions shall be liberally construed for the accomplishment of such purposes. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.020. DEFINITIONS. Unless the content specifically indicates otherwise, the meaning of terms used in this Chapter shall be as follows: 7.05.021. "As-builts" means the detailed sketch or drawing of the building sewer or disposal system as constructed. 7.05.022. "B.O.D. (denoting Biochemical Oxygen Demand) " means the quantity of oxygen utilized in the biochemical oxidatio of organic matter under standard laboratory procedure in five days at twenty degrees centigrade, expressed in parts per million by weight. 7,05.023. "Building sewer means that part of the lowest horizontal piping of a drainage system which receives the discharge from soil, wastes, and other drainage pipes inside the walls of the building and conveys it to the building sewer beginning five feet outside the wall. 7.05.024. "Combined sewer" means a sewer receiving both surface runoff and sewage. 7.05.025. "Director" means the Director of Public Works as designated from time to time in accordance with personnel policies of the City; the Director's or his authorized deputy, agent, or representative. 7.05.026. "Garbage" means solid wastes from the preparation, cooking, and dispensing of food, and from the handling, storage, and sale of produce. 7.05.027. "Industrial wastes" means the liquid wastes from industrial process as distinct from sanitary sewage. 7.05.028. "Natural outlet" means any outlet into a watercourse, pond, ditch, lake, or other body of surface or ground water. 7.05.029. "pH" means the logarithm of the reciprocal of the weight of hydrogen ions in grams per liter of solution. 7.05.030. "Properly shredded garbage" means the wastes from the preparation, cooking, and dispensing of food that have been shredded to such a degree that all particles will be carried freely under the flow conditions normally prevailing in public sewers, with no particles greater than one-half inch in any direction. 7.05.031. "Public sanitary sewer means a sewer in which all owners of abutting properties have equal rights, and which is controlled by public authority. 7.05.032. "Sanitary sewer" means a sewer which carries sewage and to which storm, surface, and ground water are not intentionally admitted. 7.05.033. "Sewage" means a combination of water-carried wastes from residences, business buildings, institutions, and industrial establishments, together with such ground, surface, and., storm waters as may be present. 7.05.034. "Sewage treatment plant" means any arrangementl of devices and structures used for treating sewage. 2 - 7.05.035. "Sewage works" means all facilities for collecting, pumping, treating, and disposing of sewage. 7.05.036. "Sewer" means a pipe or conduit for carrying sewage. 7.05.037. "Storm sewer" and "storm drain" means a sewer which carries storm and surface waters and drainage, but excludes sewage and polluted water. 7.05.038. "Suspended solids" means solids that either float on the surface of, or are in suspension in water, sewage, o: other liquids and which are removable by laboratory filtering. 7.05.039. "Watercourse" means a channel in which a flow of water occurs either continuously or intermittently. 7.05.040. Unless the context clearly demonstrates the contrary "shall" is mandatory and "may" is permissive, when used in this Chapter. (0.2374, §1 (part) ) 7.05.050. APPOINTMENT OF SEWER UTILITY PERSONNEL. All personnel of the Sewer Utility shall be appointed in accordance with personnel policies of the City of Kent. (0.2374, §1 (part) ) 7.05.060. POWERS AND AUTHORITY OF THE DIRECTOR. INSPECTORS AND ASSISTANTS. The Director and other duly authorized, employees of the City or of the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health bearing proper credentials and identification shall be permitted to enter upon all properties for the purposes of inspection, observation, measurements, sampling, and testing in accordance with provision of this Chapter. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.070. WHO MAY CONNECT WITH PUBLIC SEWER. It shall be unlawful for any person to make any opening in any public sewer or to connect any private sewer, or drain therewith, or to lay, repair, alter, or connect any private drain or sewer in public street, alley, or easement, except person, firm, or corporation holding a valid State of Washington contractor's license as defined in RCW 18.27, and a valid Business License issued by the City of Kent; provided, however, that the property owner may connect a side sewer to a side stub with the approval of and unde the supervision of the Director. Upon granting any approval for connection of a side sewer to the public sewer s stem such erson includingan future or subsequent owner, shall be res onsible fo all costs of maintenance repair, removal of obstructions, cleaning and operation of the side sewer including that portion of the private side sewer extending into the City's right of way and connecting to the public sewer including the tee or saddle ( connection thereto. Acceptance of a side sewer connection under the provisions of this Chapter within or outside of the City's right-of-way shall not be deemed to create a duty upon the Cit or Director to repair, maintain replace.or clean the same. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.080. RESTRICTIONS ON LICENSED CONTRACTOR. The licensed contractor shall be responsible for all work done under any permits issued him. It shall be the duty of every licensed contractor to leave the name and telephone number of the person responsible for work in any public street, alley, or easement with the Kent Police Department. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 3 - i j 7.05.090. CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. All side sewers shall be installed in strict accordance with specifications contained iri any existing City ordinance or Code and any construction standard; or uniform codes which may be at any time in the future adopted b) the City. All construction shall be subject to the inspection of the Director or his designee. (0.2374, §1(part)) - 7.05.100. PERMIT TO OWNER AGENT, OR OCCUPANT TO CONSTRUCT EXTEND OR REPAIR SEWER PRIVATE PROPERTY. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, extend, relay, repair or make connections to private or lateral sewer on private property without obtaining a permit therefore as herein provided and filing a scale drawing showing the location thereof. B. The Department of Public Works may issue a permit to the owner of any property to construct, extend, relay, repair or make connections to a lateral or private sewer inside of the owner's property line and outside of the owner's property line lying within the City's right-of-way; provided, that such owner shall comply with the applicable provisions of this Chapter. Said permit shall not become effective until the installation is completed to the satisfaction of the Director. The Director shall be allowed to inspect the work at any stage of construction and, in any event, the applicant for the permit shall notify the Director when the work is ready for final inspection, and before any underground portions are covered. The inspection shall be made within seventy-two hours after the receipt of written notice directed to the Director. Work shall be done by the owner or a licensed contractor. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.110. PERMITS FOR ADDITIONAL WORK REQUIRED. When al permit has been issued for a private sewer, as herein provided, nol additional work shall be put in without the approval of the Director, and a new permit must be taken out covering all such additional work. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.120. PERMIT FEES. A. The fee for each permit to connect with any public sewer or to construct, extend, relay, repair, or make connections with a lateral or private sewer inside of property line is hereby fixed at twenty-five dollars and said fee shall be paid to the Finance Department who shall issue a receipt therefor and such receipt must be filed with the Department of Public Works before the permit is issued. B. The fees for permits to construct, install or repair septic tanks shall be those established by the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health. These fees shall be paid directly to that Department. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.130. PERMIT RENEWAL FEES. In case work shall not be done or completed within the time specified in any permit and no extension thereof has been grated, a renewal of the permit shall be required for which a fee of five dollars shall be charged. (0.2374, §1(part) ) - 4 - it 7.05.140. ISSUANCE OF TEMPORARY PERMIT. In the discretion of the Director a temporary permit may be issued permitting connection to a public sewer, sewer outfall, or side sewer which said temporary permit shall be revocable upon sixty days notice posted on the premises directed to the owner or occupant of the premises, and in the event that said private sewers or drains are not disconnected at the expiration of such notice, the Director may disconnect the same and collect the cost of such disconnection from the owner or occupant of the premises by suit in any court of competent jurisdiction. Any such permittee will save the City harmless from any damage by reason o.: the issuance or revocation of such temporary permit. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.150. DISPLAY OF PERMITS. The permits required under the terms of this Chapter, must at all times during the performance of the work and until the completion thereof, be posed in some conspicuous place at or near the work. (0.2374, §1(part) )I 7.05.160. PERMIT TIME LIMIT. Any permit issued under the provisions of this Chapter shall be valid for a period of six months. Renewal permits shall be valid for an additional six months. (0.2374, §1(part) ) i 7.05.170. PERMITS TO INSTALL OR REPAIR SEPTIC SYSTEMS. A. It shall be unlawful for any person to construct, install or repair any septic system within the City of Kent without first obtaining a permit from the Seattle-King County Department of Health. That Department shall issue permits pursuant to the applicable County standards; subject, however, ( until the completion thereof, be posed in some conspicuous place at or near the work. (0.2374, §1(part) ) i B. The Department of Public Health shall not issue a permit to construct, install or repair a septic system if there is, a public sanitary sewer available and the City Council has ordered, connection thereto, unless it shall be necessary for public health; and safety that repairs to the septic system be made. C. All liquids and solids removed from septic tanks shall be disposed of to the satisfaction of the Director. (0.2374, §1(part) ) II 7.05.190. USE OF PUBLIC SEWERS RE UUIIR_ED. I A. It shall be unlawful for any person to place, deposit, or permit to be deposited in an unsanitary manner upon public or private property within the City of Kent, or in any area under the jurisdiction of said City, any human or animal excrement, garbage, or other objectional waste. B. Except as hereinafter provided, it shall be unlawfuli to construct or maintain any privy, privy vault, septic tank, cesspool, or other facility intended or used for the disposal of sewage. C. The owners of all houses, buildings or properties used for human occupancy, employment, recreation, or other purpose, situated within or without -he City of Kent and abutting 5 - it II �I III i on any street, alley, or easement in which there is now located or may in the future be located a public sanitary sewer of the City of Kent, are hereby required at their expense to install suitable toilet facilities therein, and to connect such facilities directl with the proper public sewer in accordance with the provision of this ordinance, within ninety days after date of official notice to do so, provided that said public sewer is within two hundred feet of the building or buildings and specific provisions have been made to connect such to the public sewer and that no public health or safety hazards exist as determined by the Director. (0.2811) D. In all cases where a public health or safety hazard exists as determined by the Director and the property is availabl to the public sewer the City Council shall ((eemplete) ) direct th� owners of such buildings or properties to connect to the public sewer at their expense within twenty days of such notice. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.200. PRIVY WELLS OR VAULTS AND CESSPOOLS, PROHIBITED. A. Whenever, in the judgment of any Public Health officer, the use and maintenance of any privy well, or vault, or cesspool, located upon any premises in the City of Kent is detrimental or dangerous to life or health, the City Council may prohibit the use of such privy well, or vault, or cesspool and may order the same to be disinfected and filled with fresh earth. To that end the City Council shall direct the Director to notify in writing the owner or occupant of such premises that the privy well or vault, or cesspool, must be disinfected and filled with fresh earth, and a suitable sewage disposal system constructed within a period of twenty days from and after the time when such notice shall be served. B. Nothing herein contained shall prohibit the use of cesspools or sumps for the disposition of liquids from floor drains, or laundry trays where said fixtures are too low to drain into the sanitary sewer. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.210. PRIVATE SEWAGE DISPOSAL. A. No septic tank shall be permitted to discharge to any public sewer or outlet. B. Any abandoned septic tanks, cesspools, and similar private sewage disposal facilities shall be filled with suitable material and in a manner which will insure the public safety, health and well-being. C. All private sewage disposal facilities shall be operated and maintained in a sanitary manner at the entire expend of the owner. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.220. SEPTIC TANK REPAIRS REQUIRED. A. Whenever, in the judgment of the Director, or any Public Health Officer, any private septic tank shall fail to function properly or the continued use of such private septic tan will be detrimental to life or health, it shall be the duty of the 6 - Director of Health Officer to report that fact in writing to the City Council. If the City Council determines that the continued use of such private septic tank will be detrimental to life or health, it may order such work to be done upon the premises where the private septic tank is situated as it deems necessary to restore and insure sanitary conditions upon such premises. The work shall be done according to the provisions of this Chapter. 7.05.230. CITY MAY CONNECT AND ASSESS COSTS. If any owner or occupant shall fail, neglect or refuse to connect his lands, buildings, or premises with the public sewer within the time specified in the notice referred within this Chapter, or shall fail, neglect or refuse to do the other work specified and ordered to be done as this Chapter provides within the time specified in the notice theretofore served upon such owner or occupant, the Director shall make such connection to do such work and the cost of the connection or of such work done by the Director shall be assessed against the property so connected or upon which such work is done and the amount of such cost shall become a lien upon the said premises so connected or upon which said work is done, and the City Attorney of the City of kent is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to collect the amount or the cost of such connection or the doing of such work, either by foreclosure of said lien or by a suit against the owner or occupant of said premises, which suit shall be maintained in the name of the City of Kent, as plaintiff, in any court of competent jurisdiction. (0.2374, §1 (part) ) 7.05.240. REPAIR OF OBSTRUCTED OR BROKEN SEWERS. Whenever any private sewer pipe connected with any public sewer becomes obstructed, broken or out of order, and if the owner, agent or occupant of such premises fails to repair the same within five days after notification to do so by the Director, the Director is hereby authorized to remove, reconstruct, replace, alter or clear the same as required, at the expense of the owner, agent or occupant of such premises, and when two or more houses o buildings are connected with the same private sewer, the owners, agent or occupants of such premises, shall be jointly and equally liable for any work done at the direction of the Director under this section. No permit shall be required for the removal of obstructions from private sewers, providing the pipe is not damaged. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.250. USE OF PUBLIC SEWERS. A. No person or business firm, shall discharge or cause to be discharged any storm water, surface water, ground water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, cooling water, or unpolluted I industrial process waters to any sanitary sewer. B. Storm water and other unpolluted drainage shall be discharged to such drains as are specifically designated as storm sewers, or to a natural outlet approved by the Director. Industrial cooling water or unpolluted process waters may be discharged, upon approval of the Director and other authorizing government agencies to a storm sewer or natural outlet. 7 I I �I C. Except as hereinafter provided, no person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any of the following describec waters to any public sewer: 1. Any liquid or vapor having a temperature higher -than one hundred fifty degrees Fahrenheit; 2. Any water or waste which may contain more than one hundred parts per million, by weight of fat, oil, or grease; 3. Any gasoline, benzene, naphtha, fuel oil, or other flammable or explosive liquid, solid or gas. 4. Any garbage that has not been properly shredded; 5. Any ashes, cinders, sand, mud, straw, shavings, metal, glass, rags, feathers, tar, plastics, wood, paunch manure, or any other solid or viscous substance capable of causing obstruction to the flow in sewers or other interference with the proper operation of the sewage works; 6. Any waters or wastes having a pH lower than 5.5 or 9.0 or having any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to structures, equipment, and personnel of the sewage works; 7. Any waters or wastes containing a toxic or poisonous substance in sufficient quantity to injure or interfere with any sewage treatment process, constitute a hazard to humans or animals, or create any hazard in the receiving waters of the sewage treatment plant; 8. Any waters or wastes containing suspended solid of such character and quantity that unusual attention or expense is required to handle such materials at the sewage treatment plant; 9. Any noxious or malodorous gas or substance capable of creating a public nuisance. D. Grease, oil and sand interceptors shall be provided when in the opinion of the Director, they are necessary for the proper handling of liquid wastes containing grease in excessive amounts, or any flammable wastes, sand and other harmful ingredients; except that such interceptors shall not be required for private living quarters or dwelling units. All interceptors shall be of the type and capacity approved by the Director, and shall be located as to be readily and easily accessible for cleaning and inspection at the expense of the owner or user. I E. Grease and oil interceptors shall be constructed of impervious materials capable of withstanding abrupt and extreme changes in temperature. They shall be of substantial construction, watertight, and equipped with easily removable covers which, when bolted in place, shall be gastight and watertight. F. Where installed, all grease, oil and sand interceptors shall be maintained by the owner, at his expense, in efficient operation at all times. G. The admission into the public sewers of any waters or wastes having: 1. a five-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand greater than three hundred parts per million by weight, or 2. containing more than three hundred fifty parts per million by weight of suspended solids, or 3. containing any quantity or substances having the characteristics described above in this section, or 4. having an average daily flow greater than two percent of the average daily sewage flow of the City, shall be subject to the review and approval of the Director. Where necessary in the opinion of the Director, the owner shall provide, at his expense, such preliminary treatment as may be necessary to: i. reduce the Biochemical Oxygen Demand to three hundred part per million and the suspended solids to three hundred fifty parts per million by weight, or ii. reduce objectionable characteristics or constituents to within the maximum limits provided for above, or iii. control the quantities and rates of discharge of such waters or wastes. Plans, specifications, and other pertinent information relating to proposed preliminary treatment facilities shall be submitted for the approval of the Director and' of the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle and the Department of Ecology of the State of Washington, and no construction of such facilities shall be commenced until said approvals are obtained in writing. H. Where preliminary treatment facilities are provided for any waters or wastes, they shall be maintained continuously in satisfactory and effective operation, by the owner at his expense. I. Canneries, Vegetable and Fruit. Vegetable and fruit canneries (unless other arrangements are made with the Director with the approval of the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle of the State of Washington) shall provide an efficient screen for the removal of skins, seeds, pomace, culls, discarded produce and other suspended material from the wastes from the washing, sorting, or other canning processes. This screen must be 20-mesh, U.S. Standard gauge, and may be of the vibrating, rotary or any other effective type. It shall be located on the main outlet sewer line or lines from the cannery in such a way that all waste waters, except cooling or other clean waters, will pass through the screen. Cooling or other clean waters may be bypasses around the screen or discharged through a separate outlet. Prior to the installation of the screen, a plan drawing of the facility, together with data as to capacity, shall be submitted to the Director, METRO and to the Department of Ecology of the State of Washington for approval. Screenings and other solid material removed from the product during the cannery operations shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the Director, and, in any event, in such a manner that it will not enter a water of the State of Washington. 9 - i J. When required by the Director, the owner of any property served by a building sewer carrying industrial wastes shall install a suitable control manhole in the building sewer to facilitate observation, sampling and measurement of the wastes. Such manhole, when required, shall be accessible and safely located and shall be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the Director. The manhole shall be installed by the owner at his expense, and shall be maintained by him so as to be safe and accessible at all times. K. All measurements, tests, and analysis of the characteristics of waters and wastes to which reference is made i ' this section above shall be determined in accordance with "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and sewage", and shall be determined at the control manhole provided for in the above paragraph in this section upon suitable samples taken at said control manhole. In the event that no special manhole has been required, the control manhole shall be considered to be the nearest downstream manhole in the public sewer to the point at which the building sewer is connected. (0.2374 §1(part) ) 7.05.260. SIDE SEWER CONSTRUCTION MUST COMPLY WITH CHAPTER. When any side sewer whether upon private Property or upon the City's right-of-way, is constructed, laid, connected or repaired and does not comply with the provisions of this Chapter or any construction standards, or codes which may hereafter be adopted, or where it is determined by the Director that a side sewer is obstructed, broken or inadequate and is a menace to health, or is liable to cause damage to public or private property, the Director shall give notice to the owner, agent, or occupant of the property in which such condition exists, of such condition, and if he shall refuse to construct, relay, reconstruct, or remove the obstruction of said side sewer, within the time specified in such notice, the Director may perform such work as may be necessary to comply with this Chapter, and the cost of such work shall be assessed against such property, or collecte from the person responsible for such condition, and the amount thereof shall become a lien upon the said property, and the City Attorney is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to collect such cost, either by the foreclosure of said lien or by a suite against the owner or occupant of such property, or other person responsible for such condition, which suite shall be maintained in� the name of the City of Kent, as plaintiff, in any court of competent jurisdiction. (0.2374, §1 (part) ) 7.05.270. FEES FOR INSPECTION. A. There shall be no charge for required inspections unless an inspection is necessary because of failure to comply with the terms of this Chapter or any instruction standards, specifications of codes of the City; provided that, if the Seattle-King County Department of Public Health requires inspection fees for the construction, installation or repairs of septic tank systems, such fees shall be paid to that Department. For all inspections for which a charge is made by the City of Kent, the charge shall consist of the actual cost per hour, including overhead, of sending Public Works Department personnel to make the inspections, plus equipment rental charges, if any. In no event shall the charge be less than twenty-five dollars. - 10 - i i B. All inspection fees shall be paid to the Finance Director who shall issue receipts therefor. No permit shall be issued to any person who is delinquent in the payment of inspection charges. (0.2374, §1 (part) ) 7.05.280. DAMAGES TO PUBLIC SEWERS. No person shall caus to break, damage, destroy, uncover, deface or tamper with any structure, appurtenance, or equipment which is a part of the sewage works. (0.2374, §1 (part) ) 7.05.290. PLANTING OF CERTAIN TREES AND SHRUBBERY PROHIBITED. It shall be unlawful to plant poplar, cottonwood, soft maples, willow, or any other tree or shrub whose roots are likely to obstruct public or private sewers. The Director is hereby authorized to remove any trees or shrubs from any public street or the roots of any trees or shrubs which extend into any 'street street or riqht-of-way, or the roots of any trees or shrubi) which extend into any public street or riqht-of-way, when said 4 trees or the roots thereof, are obstructing, or when he shall i determine that they are liable to obstruct, public or private sewers; provided, however, that he shall give ten days notice in writing to the owner or occupant of the abutting property to remove the same, and if such owner or occupant fails or refuses t� do so, the reasonable cost of such removal from either private property, right-of-ways, alleys or streets, when done at the direction of the Director shall be a charge against, and a lien upon the abutting property from which such trees or shrubs are removed, and the City Attorney is hereby authorized and directed to collect such charge by suit maintained in the name of the City of Kent as plaintiff, against the owner in any court of competent jurisdiction. (0.2374, §1 (part) ) I 7.05.300. PROPERTY NOT ASSESSED FOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION UNDER A LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT TO PAY SUM IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT. A. No permits shall be issued for a connection to any public sewer for any property that has not been assessed for the i construction of said sewer by a local improvement district, except as follows: 1. Property which was not assessed for a local improvement district, but which has a sanitary sewer in the street, alley, or sewer easement abutting said property shall be charged an assessment on the same basis as property which was in the local improvement district, said property should pay an assessment equal to two dollars and fifty cents for every one hundred square feet of area of the lot, tract or parcel of property to be provided sewer service. 2. Satisfactory arrangement shall be made with the Finance Director for payment prior to the issuing of any permits provided for above. B. Side sewers constructed without the payment of the above charges shall be disconnected within fifteen days after the owner is notified by the Director that the above charge has not been paid in the event the payment is not made. ( (0.2374, §1(part) ) i M I I, 7.05.310. SCHEDULE OF CHARGES--WITHIN CITY. 1. Single-family residential; $16.45 per month. (0.2827) 2. Single-family residential/lifeline; $14.25 per month. (0.2827) Eligibility criteria for lifeline rate shall be established by City Council. 3. Other than single-family residential shall be billed irj accordance with the consumption of water and at the following ratE� except that no monthly bill shall be less than $16.45. (0.2827) All; $1.60 plus $1.65 per 100 cubic feet per month. (0.2374, § (part) ; 2679 §1; 0.2827) 7.05.320. SCHEDULE OF CHARGES--OUTSIDE CITY. Sewer service charges for customers residing outside the City shall be the charges set forth in KCC 7.05.280. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.330. WATER METERS FOR METRO BILLING. All sewer accounts for other than single-family residential uses must have water meters or sewer meters for billing purposes. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.340. EXEMPTION METERS. The amount of flow for the purpose of sewer service billing may be measured by a sewer meter installed and maintained at the customer's expense, or by reading a water meter with allowance made for water measured by any exemption meter which has been approved by both METRO and the j City. (0.2374, §1(part) ) I �I 7.05.350. CERTIFICATION OF SEWER METERS. All sewer meters shall be certified for accuracy at least once each year by an I independent testing agency. In the event the City demands an inspection other than a regular annual inspection and the inspection reveals that the meter is operating properly the City shall bear the cost of the inspection, otherwise, the cost shall be borne by the customer. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.360. SEWER SERVICE TO CUSTOMERS OBTAINING WATER FROM SOURCES OTHER THAN THE KENT WATER UTILITY. For sewer service to customers obtaining water from sources other than the Kent Water Utility, the following regulations shall apply: A. Single-family residential customers shall pay the flat rate. B. All customers other than single-family residential shall install a meter on their source of water within thirty days of date of application or service will be discontinued. Upon request of the customer, the City will install a meter in accordance with its standard practice for such installations. C. City of Kent personnel will read the privately owned meters on normal water meter reading dates. D. If the meter is the property of a water district or other municipal corporation, the customer must submit written 12 - i permission from the water district or municipal corporation for the Kent meter reader to read such meter on the normal reading date. (0.2374, §1(part) ) 7.05.370. PENALTY FOR VIOLATION. Any person, firm, or corporation found guilty of violating this Chapter or any part thereof shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction thereof, shall be subject to a fine not exceeding three hundred dollars. (0.2374, §1(part) ) Section 2. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: SANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY PASSED the day of 1990. APPROVED the day of 1990. PUBLISHED the day of 1990. I I 13 - Kent City Council Meeting J Date February 6 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: %CONTRACT ITB-STTATE-.- FIRE ACADEMY `' 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to enter into a contract with the State of Washington, Department of Community Development, to provide a drill master to State Fire Academy 90-1 subject to review by the City Attorney. The Kent Fire Department will be sending 14 firefighter recruits to the State Fire Academy in February for training. The State has requested that Battalion Chief Orndorff act as Drill Master for this academy. The State has agreed to reimburse the City $20, 000 to cover the Battalion Chief's regular salary and estimated costs of overtime incurred in order to assign another Battalion Chief to handle Battalion Chief Orndorff's current assignments. This contract is the same as last years : ciitY < 3 . EXHIBITS: gNone 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: ',,, Public Safety Committee and Staff (Committee, StAff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGETED FISCAL P SONNEL IMPACT- NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOT • Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ \ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3Q MCCARTHY,TONY / KENT70/FN - HPDesk print. ----------------------------------------- Subject: CONTRACT FOR DRILL MASTER FOR STATE ACADEMY - FISCAL NOTE C ator: Tony MCCARTHY / KENT70/FN Dated: 01/30/90 at 1425. WITH THE ASSIGNMENT OF CHIEF ORNDORFF TO THE STATE FIRE ACADEMY AS DRILL MASTER FOR A FEBRUARY TRAINING SESSION, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL INCUR OVERTIME COST TO COVER THE POSITION DURING THE ASSIGMENT. THE STATE WILL REIMBURSE THE CITY $20, 000 FOR SALARY AND OVERTIME COSTS DURING THE ASSIGNMENT ALLOWING THE CITY TO ASSIGN ANOTHER BATTALION CHIEF TO HANDLE ORNDORFF'S DUTIES. THIS REIMBURSEMENT SHOULD MORE THAN COVER THE EXTRA COSTS AND THE IBC RECCOMMENDS APPROVAL. SINCE THE PRECISE BUDGET IMPACT IS NOT KNOWN SINCE EXISTING POSITIONS WILL BE FILLING ACTING ROLES, THE IBC DOES NOT RECCOMMEND AN ACTUAL BUDGET CHANGE. ACCORDING TO THE FIRE CHIEF, EXTRA FUNDS MAY HELP OFFSET THE COST OF MOVING BOND PROJECT PERSONNEL TO THE GENERAL FUND. A FULL RECCOMMENDATION ON THIS POTENTIAL BUDGET CHANGE WILL BE PRESENTED AT A LATER TIME. V P Kent City Council Meeting �/ Date February 6 , 1990 J Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: AERIAL APPARATUS 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to call for bids for construction of aerial apparatus. The Fire Department was given approval to purchase aerial apparatus out of the Public Safety Bond Issue. It is necessary to go out to bid following a mutual agreement to terminate the City's first contract for construction of the apparatus. 3 . EXHIBITS: Node' 4 . RECOMMENDED Y: Public Safety Committee Staff (Committe , Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5. UNBUDGET D FISCAL PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL P RSONNEL NOTE: Recommended_ Not Recommended LL, 6. EXPENDTIl'`TRF REQUIRED: with funds available subject to bid SOURCE OF FUNDS: funds are already budgeted within the Public Safetv, Bond Projects 7 . CITY �OUNCIL ACTION: Councfilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSI6N. ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3R Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6. 1990 t Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: EASTBROOK BUSINESS PARK PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION NO. SU-89-5 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to set February 20, 1990 for a public meeting to consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of an application by KPFF Consulting Engineers for an 11 lot industrial subdivision. The property is 38 acres in size and is located east of 80th Ave. So. between So. 180th Street and So. 188th Street. 3 . EXHIBITS: None 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Hearing Examiner January 3 1990 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) Approval with 12 conditions. 5 . UNBUDGETED ISCAL PERSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended 6 . EXPENDITUF,IE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF; FUNDS- 7 . CITY CPI*CIL ACTION: Council ember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION- Council Agenda Item No. 3S tiQ Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6 , 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: JAIL HEALTH SERVICES -E6F3#£ _.OEPB TP4ENT OF _PUBL-j-E---R-EA-LTH 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign the Jail Health Services contract as approved by the City Attorney. 3 . EXHIBITS: \ Contract 4 . RECOMMENDED Bl\: Staff & Public Safety Committee 2/1/90 (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL ERSONNEL IMPACT: NO X YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL N TE: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED:"' Budqeted expenditure SOURCE OF FUNDS: _ 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3T I , Contractor: Seattle—King County Department of Public Health Address: 110 Prefontaine Place South Suite 600 Seattle, Washington 98104 Services Provided: Jail Health Services Amount: $57, 620 Duration: January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1990 Liaison, Health Allan Persyn Department: (206) 296-1082 City of Kent: Captain Dennis Byerly 220 Fourth Avenue South Kent, Washington 98031 CONTRACT FOR SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, entered into as of the 1st day of January, 1990, by the City of Kent, hereinafter referred to as the "City, " and the Seattle—King County Depart— ment of Public Health, hereinafter referred to as the "Contractor, " WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City is undertaking certain activities necessary to meet health needs as they relate to correctional health services; and WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Contractor to render certain services in connection with such undertakings of the City, NOW, THEREFORE, the parties do mutually agree as follows: I. Scope of Services A. The Contractor' s responsibilities include: 1 . Scheduling A nurse practitioner and a public health nurse will each be rou— tinely scheduled for 20 hours/week. Holidays and leaves of absence will necessitate variation in the scheduling of personnel . 2. Sick Call a. A minimum of 20 hours/week of sick call will be available. It will be scheduled Monday through Friday. Clinic hours will be determined by mutual agreement. Sick call consists of diagnostic and treatment services for acute and chronic illness and will be provided by nurse practitioner and public health nurse staff consistent with Section l .b. Contract for Services — January 1 , 1990 City of Kent/Seattle—King County Dept. of Public Health Page 2 b, Treatment of acute or chronic medical conditions will be limited by: — licensure, certification, and training of nurse practi— tioners and public health nurses. — availability of monitoring, observational and treatment capabilities of qualifiedns staff, resources. at — availability of support c. Laboratory tests ordered by Contractor staff will be pro— vided by the Contractor. 3. 14—day Health Appraisal a. 14—day health appraisals will be conducted within the 10th and 17th day of confinement. b. The 14—day health appraisal will include: — basic medical/health history, — vital signs, — brief physical examination, — TB skin test, — syphilis serology, — review of Contractor—approved Reviewing/Screening Form. 4. Health Receiving Screening a. The Contractor will update, as necessary, the Health Receiv— ing/Screening Form. b. The Contractor staff will train corrections officers in use and application of the form. c. The Contractor staff will review all Health Receiving/Screen— ing Forms and recommend appropriate followup. 5. Triage a. Contractor staff will review written inmate complaints/ requests during normal Monday through Friday clinic hours. b. Corrections staff will collect written inmate complaints/ requests during the hours the Contractor staff are not at the correction facility. c. Contractor staff will prioritize complaints/requests and will followup as appropriate. 6. Medical Records a. Contractor staff will maintain the medical records system. b. Contractor staff will maintain a system which protects the confidentiality of health information. c. Corrections staff will insure the provisions of Section 5. b above are maintained. d. Contractor staff, upon notification of corrections staff, will prepare appropriate information on inmates transferred to another correctional facility. Contract for Services — January 1 , 1990 City of Kent/Seattle—King County Dept. of Public Health Page 3 e. Contractor is the keeper of the health records. Release of any confidential health information will be done by the Contractor per the Contractor' s policy and procedures. 7. Policy and Procedure Manual Contractor will maintain a policy and procedure manual for activities and services provided by Contractor staff. 8. Medications Prescriptions written by Contractor will be supplied in standard pharmacy packing through a pharmacy contract to a maximum Contractor' s responsibility of $1 , 200, unless renegotiated by the City and Contractor. This pharmacy contract will be obtained by and for the Contractor. 9. Medication Administration Contractor staff will administer all jail health—approved medica— tions to the individual inmates when such staff are on site during normal Monday through Friday clinic hours. The City will be responsible for medication distribution at other times. 10. Dental Services Dental services will be limited to emergency care or pain relief and may be provided at Contractor' s location during normal clinic hours (8 AM to 4: 30 PM, Monday through Friday). Two (2) hours notification by the City is needed to make necessary accom— modations. a. Transporting, escort service, and security will be provided by the City. b. Payment for dental services will be in accordance with Section III.B of this agreement and is separate from the base agreement. appoint— ment Due to the disruption of normal clinic activity, any app ment that is more than 15 minutes late will be rescheduled. The City will be charged for any such missed appointment, or a cancellation without at least 24 hours notice, at the rate of a normal examination. 11 . Telephone Consultation Services Contractor staff will provide limited telephone consultation to Corrections staff during periods when the clinic is not scheduled. This service is subject to the following limitations: a. Contractor staff will be available only at telephone numbers which they will provide. Contract for Services — January 1 , 1990 City of Kent/Seattle—King County Dept. of Public Health Page 4 b. Contractor staff will not be on any form of "standby." c. Contractor staff ,ty eds on their willingnessvtoU ntary pre given telephone site and — sence at a par— ticipate. voluntary at all d. Contractor staff participation is .strictly times. e. The City will be charged for not less than 15 minutes o Contractor staff time for each telephone consultation and in increments of 15 minutes for any time after that for each incident.) The charge for service time will be according to personnel costs for labor at the time of the iconsultatg n in accordance to Washington State Nursing el rules, whichever County contract or King County applies. This cost will be above and beyond the amount listed in the basic contract. f. Such telephone consultation will be limited to basidarealcal triage/screening and norovide°adviced as regardingency necessary Contractor staff will p further action required. telephone calls will g. Contractor staff who receive consulting P maintain a log indicating the date, time, length of call , and general call content. This log will reviewed at least Ci quarterly. or upon request, with the Cty of Kent Correctional Facility administrator. actual h. An itemized list of telephonecoContractorsto, theuCity of costs, will be submitted by the Kent Correctional Facility administrator on a monthly basis. The Contractor' s Jail Health Services administrator wllmeet 12. administrator and quarterly with the City' s Correctional Facility review the health care delivery -y stem- 13. The Contractor will provide quarterly and annual statistical reports on the health care delivery system in the City' s correctional facility- B. The City' s responsibilities include: 1 . Providing an appropriate examination room, furnishings, telephone, and security for the Contractor' s staff, 2. Providing for the security of records and maintenance of con— fidentiality when Contractor staff is not on site. 3. Providing medical , dental , and pharmacy services not specifically provided by the Contractor, and any psychiatric services. 4. The City' s correctional facility administrator will meet quar— terly with the Contractor' s jail health administrator to review the health care delivery system. Contract for Services — January 11 1990 City of Kent/Seattle—King County Department of Public Health Page 5 II. Time of Performance The services of the Contractor are to commence on the lst day of January, 1990, and terminate on the 31st day of December, 1990. The duration of the contract may be extended or terminated upon mutual written agreement between the parties hereto and pursuant to the terms and conditions of the agreement. III. Compensation and Method of Payment A. The City agrees to compensate the Contractor in the total amount not to exceed the maximum of $57, 620 — see Exhibit A. The City shall make payment within 30 days of receipt and approval of invoice(s). B. The City shall reimburse the Contractor for dental services — see Exhibit B. The City shall make payment within 30 days of receipt and approval of invoice(s). IV. Indemnification The City shall defend, protect, and hold harmless the Contractor, its elected and appointed officials, and any employee thereof, from and against all claims, suits, or actions, including the cost of defense thereof, arising from any negligent act or omission, or violation of constitutional or civil rights committed by the City pursuant to this contract. The City agrees that its obligations under this subparagraph extend to any claim, demand or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any employee of the City against the Contractor, its officer, agents or employees, and includes any judgment, award, and cost arising therefrom, including attorney' s fees. The Contractor shall defend, protect, and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officials, and any employee thereof, from and against all claims, suits or actions, including the cost of defense thereof, arising from any negligent act or omission or violation of constitutional or civil rights committed by the Contractor pursuant to this contract. The Contractor agrees that the obligation to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and its agents and employees under this subparagraph extends to any claim, demand or cause of action brought by or on behalf of any employee of the Contractor, against the City, its officers, agents, or employees and include any judgment, award and cost arising therefrom, including attorney' s fees. V. Changes Either party may request changes in scope of services, performing or reporting standards, or budget adjustments provided hereunder. Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be incorporated by written EXHIBIT "A" Kent Jail Health Program 1990 Staffing Family Nurse Practitioner 1044 hrsl $19, 332 Public Health Nurse 1044 hrsl 17, 286 Physician 36 hrs 1, 203 Administrative Specialist I 70 hrs 729 Nutritionist 16 hrs 258 Family Nurse Practitioner, Int. 157 hrs 2, 771 Subtotal $41 , 579 Salary & Wage Contingency2 173 Fringe Benefits 11 , 189 Total $52, 941 lIncludes paid time off 2For non—nursing personnel only. Nurses rates calculated at 1990 rates under present labor contract. Non—Personnel Office Supplies $ 300 Pharmaceuticals 1, 200 Medical Supplies 11000 Misc. Operating Supplies 500 Laboratory Services 500 Mileage 819 Insurance 360 Total 4, 679 PROJECT TOTAL $57,620 AFP:md 12/5/89 U� Kent City Council Meeting ti Date February 6, 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: + f STREET VACATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution No. jr ` setting a public hearing date for March 20, 1990 on the Anderson request for vacation of a portion of West Valley Highway. 3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution 4 . RECOMMENDED B - Staff (Committee, taff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) e i 5. UNBUDGETED FISCALP RSONNEL IMPACT: NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NO A: Recommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: SOURCE OF FUNDS- 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3U RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, regarding vacation of certain property which is a portion of the West Valley Highway and of County Road No. 332 adjacent to the Norman Anderson property and more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and setting a public hearing for March 20, 1990 on the application of Norman Anderson. WHEREAS, a proper petition has been filed requesting the vacation of a portion of the West Valley Highway and of County Road No. 332 adjacent to the Norman Anderson property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A public hearing on the aforesaid vacation petition shall be at a regular meeting of the Kent City Council to be held at 7:00 p.m. March 20, 1990, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, Kent, Washington. Section 2. The City Clerk shall give proper notice of the hearing and cause the notice to be posted as provided by law. Section 3. The Planning Director shall obtain the necessary approval or rejection of or other information from the Water, Street, and Sewer and other appropriate departments and shall transmit information to the City Council so that the matter can be considered by the City Council at a regular meeting on March 20, 1990. Passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington this day of 1990. Conc rred in by the Mayor of the City of Kent, this day of 1990. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: f r Cal 6 u O,T c^.nr- .nu 2.8c•94 sea ac tse 1' '. I vc� 5f6.8 3t77.6 ./ ;d N c ry <„ rs �0 9p� rl1 W ,ail m 14 � (n�ti��nl sauf�o,�✓ �, ny'1+(V � reEA✓�A I � .0 C \ D ;�lz ) I 3 1 2 m Ip J• .:� CLI rll . I pe4 I I i o I-i >>9ac « t � '7 s O f 0 � •i 3 Rp 0 1 , 00 lt\ Q D sf00 ...6 s• a L o �WTO v .100 oop ,v. D'I14 � /1•� w f! � ° � �' � •LOT I a 09 o ,1 1?_6,G lit O co " LOT 2 a- (Cr6-, J � \ b O, G•iT O• Y O 1,3LNf 22I _ 15L 10 5 A, , IL C.vH-ol is«' aR }L I S♦ (iizig7 D d ,6 �LP �' i /S L/Ly ^ Spa \ �. ( r•a>«_J D..,,B ° �� LS p'�g9D O n If Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6 , 1990 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PARKING ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Ordinance No. _ ✓� authorizing designation of parking staff for Police and Fire vehicles on Gowe St. between 3rd and 4th Avenues. 3 . EXHIBITS: Oi'-4inance 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff, Public Safety Committee (Committee, Staf Examiner, Commission, etc. ) r 5 . UNBUDGETED FISCAL/PERSONNEL IMPACT:_ NO YES FISCAL/PERSONNEL NOTE: Fecommended Not Recommended 6. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 7 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3V 3 ✓ PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 30, 1990 PAGE 2 changed such that the affected department have the discretion of accepting the deeds. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution accomplishing same. ORDINANCE - SIDE SEWER REPAIR. MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY Wickstrom explained we are clarifying the ordinance dealing with side sewers. The practice has been that the property owner is responsible for the entire side sewer from his house to the main and there was a question when this occurred in public right of way. The ordinance is being revised to denote that the property owner is responsible for the side sewer even if it falls within public right of way. Orr asked if the property owner was allowed to hire his own contractor to.do any required repairs. It was confirmed the property owner has that right. When it is in public right of way he has to hire a licensed contractor but when it is private property he can do it himself if he chooses. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance. CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT - 116TH AVENUE S E SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Wickstrom explained this sewer main was constructed for the Fire Training Center in the vicinity of 116th Avenue S.E. and S. 248th and was funded by the G.O. Bond issue. In order to get reimbursed when properties connect in the future, we are proposing to establish a charge 'in lieu of assessment upon connection. Wickstrom explained the map in the packet indicated what the cost would be to each property if they connected. Wickstrom clarified for Dowell these were very good rates for sewer connection. The Committee unanimously approved establishing the charge in lieu of assessment for future connection to the sanitary sewer main. —� PARKING ORDINANCE - POLICE AND FIRE VEHICLES Wickstrom stated the purpose of this ordinance is to restrict parking on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth to police and fire vehicles only during construction of the Centennial Building. Jim Hansen stated this would allow quick access to these vehicles in event of an emergency and secondly, there is concern about security of the vehicles if they are parked a distance from City hall. Dowell asked if there were any residences being affected by this. Hansen replied there are no residences in the area but the greatest concern has been the public's access to City buildings, and the merchants concerns about parking for their customers. Hansen P BIT WORMS COMMlilEE ANU)CRY 130, 1990 PAGE 3 stated a parking plan was distributed to all the employees indicating parking areas for them which avoids any direct competition with retail parking. So far, it has been working. Hansen commented only one business will be affected by this restriction but there is private parking available adjacent to this business. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance and suggested it be placed on the Council agenda under "Other Business". ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, authorizing designation oi- parking stalls for Police and Fire Department vehicles on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth Avenues. WHEREAS, the City regulates parking in designated areas Iof the City, including Gowe Street between Third and Fourth 7venues; and WHEREAS, with construction of the Centennial Building, ublic parking lots located between Third and Fourth Avenues etween Titus and Gowe Streets will be significantly reduced; and WHEREAS, the City desires to provide for adequate parking or official and emergency vehicles operated by the Kent Fire and olice Departments; and WHEREAS, an emergency exists affecting the health, safety nd welfare of the community; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Council during centennial Building Project construction to authorize Police Department and Fire Department vehicles to park at designated �talls and spaces on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth Streets, xcepting utility customer parking spaces; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES EREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. FINDINGS. The Council finds that it is Necessary for parking on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth Streets to be restricted to official Kent Police Department and Cent Fire Department vehicles, excepting designated utility customer parking spaces during project construction of the Centennial Building. I i Section 2. KCC 10.06 is amended as follows: 10.06.120. TWO HOUR PARKING ZONES Except for permits sued by the Traffic Engineer under KCC 10 06 120 at such times 'as the Public Works Director or designee ((Traffie-Engineer) ) (shall place the appropriate sign or signs, it shall be illegal to park any motor or other vehicle for an uninterrupted period in excess of two hours between the hours of nine a.m. and six p.m. on (the following roadways or portions thereof: Harrison Street (Fourth Avenue - Second Avenue) Meeker Street (Fourth Avenue - State Avenue) Gowe Street (Fourth Avenue - Central Avenue) excepting area between Third and Fourth Avenues Titus Street (Second Avenue - First Avenue) First Avenue (from a point two hundred feet north of Meeker Street - Titus j� Street) Second Avenue Smith Street - Titus Street Railroad Avenue (Smith Street - Meeker Street, east side only) (Meeker Street - Gowe Street) State Avenue (Smith Street - Meeker Street) Provided that this Section shall not apply on Sundays or holidays. (0.1972, §1; 0.2427, §2; (0.2707) I, Section 3. A new section of Kent City Code Chapter 10.06 is added as follows: 10.06.245. POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENT PARKING ONLY ONE. At such times as the Public Works Director or designee (Shall place appropriate signs designating official Police and Fire i bepartment vehicle parking only on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth Avenues, it shall be unlawful to park any motor vehicle other than designated official Police and Fire Department vehicles 1 _ 2 _ Section 9. All actions of the Public Works Director and designee implementing this ordinance, including actions prior to adoption of this ordinance, are hereby ratified as actions of the ent City Council_ Section 5. Declaration of Emergency and Effective Date. In accordance with RCW 35A.11.090, this Ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of public peace, health, and safety and £or the support of City government and its existing public iinstitutions, and by reason of the facts above stated and the emergency which is hereby declared to exist, this Ordinance shall + become effective immediately upon the approval or signing of the Same by the Mayor or passage over his veto, as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR ATTEST: MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK LPROVED AS TO FORM: ANDRA DRISCOLL, CITY ATTORNEY ASSED the day of 1990. PPROVED the day of 1990. UBLISHED the day of , 1990. - 3 - i I I hereby certify that this is a true copy of Ordinance o. passed by the City Council of the City of Kent, Washington, and approved by the Mayor of the City of Kent as hereon indicated. (SEAL) MARIE JENSEN, CITY CLERK I. f 8040-290 - 4 - 1 Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6 , 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: EASTBROOK BUSINESS PARK REZONE NO. RZ-89-1 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public meeting will consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of a request by KPFF Consulting Engineers to rezone approximately 36 acres from M2 (limited industrial) to M1 (industrial park district) . The subject property is located east of 80th Ave. So. between So. 180th Street and So. 188th Street. `� . E BI S: -s-taf memo, stra•ff report, mi-nutes, findings and \. _ ...__ recommen ation t NDED !WaringExaminer �-' (C \ sion, etc. )it- , Examiner, Commis Approval with two conditions. UNPgWETED F CAL PERSONN" IMPACT: NO YES F SCA PER NN NOT Recommended Not Recommended EXPENUI1!=- R TIRED: $ _ SOURCE 4F FUNDS 7 . C'I:TY COUNCIL ACTION: ma _ Cwncilmember � oves� s�cois To accept/reject/'madi-€ythe findings of the Hearing Examiner, to approve/dzsappr0VLe/mo44.€y- the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of Eastbrook Business Park Rezone No. RZ-89-1 and to direct the City Attorney to prepare the ordinance. 4 f_.t- Li DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4A KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 1, 1990 MEMO TO: Mayor Dan Kelleher and City Council Members FROM: James P. Harris, Planning Director SUBJECT: EASTBROOK BUSINESS PARK REZONE #RZ-89-1 On December 20, 1989 the Kent Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider a request by KPFF Consulting Engineers to rezone approximately 36 acres from M2 , Limited Industrial, to Ml, Industrial Park District. The property is located east of 80th Avenue South, between South 180th Street and South 188th Street. On January 3 , 1990, the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the Eastbrook Business Park Rezone #RZ-89-1 with the following conditions: 1 . The applicant shall complete a traffic study to identify any increase in projected PM peak hour trips generated from rezoning the property from M2 to M1. The study shall also recommend mitigation measures to reduce the impact of any traffic increase. This study shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the subject property and must be reviewed and approved by the City . In lieu of constructing the recommended mitigation measures, the applicant/developer may elect to execute a corridor participation agreement with the City. Any trips generated under M1 zoning that exceed what would be generated under M2 zoning shall be charged to the applicant/ developer at a rate equal to 100 percent of the standard vehicle trip rate, rather than the normal 50 percent rate. 2 . The applicant shall complete a traffic study to determine if the proposed rezone will add ten or more vehicle trips to the intersections of SR 167/S. 180th Street and /or SR 181/S . 180th Street. If ten or more vehicle trips will be added, then the applicant shall conduct a traffic analysis to determine measures necessary to mitigate the impacts. CA:JPH:ca FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF KENT FILE NO: EASTBROOK BUSINESS PARK #RZ-89-1 APPLICANT: KPFF CONSULTING ENGINEERS REQUEST: A request for approval to rezone property from M2 , Limited Industrial, to M1, Industrial Park. LOCATION: The subject property is located east of 80th Avenue S . , between S . 180th Street and S . 188th Street. APPLICATION FILED: 6/29/89 DEC. OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ISSUED• 10/20/89 MEETING DATE: 12/20/89 RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: 1/3/90 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL with conditions STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Department Kathy McClung, Planning Department Scott Williams, Planning Department Ed White, Public Works Department Gary Gill , Public Works Department PUBLIC TESTIMONY: Don Corson, Glacier Park Company Mark Stiefel, KPFF Consulting Engineers WRITTEN TESTIMONY: None INTRODUCTION After due consideration of all the evidence presented at public hearing on the date indicated above, and following an unaccompanied personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding area by the Hearing Examiner at a time prior to the public hearing, the following findings, conclusions and recommendation are entered by the Hearing Examiner on this application. 1 Findings and Conclusions Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant (KPFF Consulting Engineers) , on behalf of the owner of the property( Glacier Park Company) , seeks approval of a rezone of approximately 36 acres from M2, Limited Industrial , to Ml, Industrial Park. This application for a rezone is filed in conjunction with an application for preliminary plat approval for Eastbrook Business Park, File No. SU-89-5 . These Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation apply only to the request for a rezone. A separate recommendation of the Hearing Examiner to the City Council will be issued for the preliminary plat application. 2 . The subject property is located east of 80th Avenue S . , between S . 180th Street and S. 188th Street . 3 . The City-wide Comprehensive Plan designates the property as I , Industrial . The Valley Floor Plan Map designates the west half of the property as I, Industrial, and the east half of the property as IP, Industrial Park. The property is currently zoned mostly as M2 with a small northern portion designated as Ml. The surrounding area is zoned and developed with industrial uses. 4 . The subject property has access to 80th Avenue S . The street has a public right-of-way width of 60 feet. The current paving is 40 feet in width with curb and gutter. The Washington State Department of Transportation has expressed concern about the impacts the proposed rezone may have on State intersections in the area. 5 . The demand for warehouse, office and distribution uses for the property have increased since the property was zoned in M2 . The major difference between the Ml and M2 zoning districts is that office uses are allowed outright in the Mi district but require a conditional use permit in the M2 district when the use occupies more than 25 percent of a development. 6. A mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on this application on October 20, 1989 . Conditions were applied relating to drainage, filling of floodway fringe areas, wetlands permits and wildlife habitat impact mitigation. 7 . No one presented any opposition to this request for a rezone. 2 Findings and Conclusions Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 CONCLUSIONS 1. Section 15 . 09 . 050 (A) (3) of the Kent Zoning Code sets forth the standards and criteria to evaluate a request for a rezone. A request for a rezone shall only be granted if: a. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; b. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity; C. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated; d. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed rezone; e. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Based on the Findings detailed above, and with the conditions outlined in the Decision below, the proposed rezone will meet these standards and criteria and should be APPROVED. 2 . In order to make certain the proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system, it is necessary to conduct specific traffic studies to determine if there will be an increase in the level of traffic due to the rezone and, if so, what mitigation measures should be taken. DECISION The request for a rezone should be APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1 . The applicant shall complete a traffic study to identify any increase in projected PM peak hour trips generated from rezoning the property from M2 to Mi. The study shall also recommend mitigation measures to reduce the impact of any traffic increase. This study shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits for the subject property and must be 3 Findings and Conclusions Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 reviewed and approved by the City In lieu of constructing the recommended mitigation measures, the applicant/developer- may elect to execute a corridor participation agreement with the City. Any trips generated under M1 zoning that exceed what would be generated under M2 zoning shall be charged to the applicant/ developer at a rate equal to 100 percent of the standard vehicle trip rate, rather than the normal 50 percent rate. 2 . The applicant shall complete a traffic study to determine if the proposed rezone will add ten or more vehicle trips to the intersections of SR 167/S. 180th Street and /or SR 181/S . 180th Street. If ten or more vehicle trips will be added, then the applicant shall conduct a traffic analysis to determine measures necessary to mitigate the impacts. Dated this 3rd day of January, 1990. THEODORE PAUL HUNTER Hearing Examiner APPEALS FROM HEARING EXAMINER DECISIONS. Request of Reconsideration Any aggrieved person may request a reconsideration of a decision by the Hearing Examiner if either (a) a specific error of fact, law, or judgment can be identified or (b) new evidence is available which was not available, at the time of the hearing. Reconsideration requests should be addressed to: Hearing Examiner, 220 Fourth Avenue S . , Kent, WA 98032 . Reconsiderations are answered in writing by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of Right to Appeal The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final unless a written appeal to the Council is filed by a party within 14 days of the decision. The appeal must be filed with the City Clerk.. Usually, new information cannot be raised on appeal . All relevant information and arguments should be presented at the public hearing before the City Council . 4 Findings and Conclusions Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 A recommendation by the Hearing Examiner to the City Council can also be appealed. A recommendation is sent to the City- Council for a final decision; however, a public hearing is not held unless an appeal is filed. 5 .CITY. OF DENT ._ planning. R E N T O N � lal - (S 180TH ST) Hr �" .I . _ �. ...5 Sw . 43RD ST ■ rr�.>,ii�a..r�.�t7.r ��l.r�■�.■�.�.�.�r���rr*r P E<ENT CITY LIMITS 1 n N r't S 4 ZORIL LIMA 181ST OSCHO L.� ST D (VAC) i . < ry T a f o s ST :• . 182N0 1 -'1 • K i - 1 N R ST ' S 188TH ........... Lv:{v! W 1 ST Z 190TH ST 80 rh O y Z PL S ry ' S 197NO ST '�+ j - ST ' x o i , m I I S 194TH ST 1 i r •� 5 196TH Si ` t ' N w a w r r m r J { s 2oorH ST r T LEGEND APPLIGATION Name EaStbroQk BuSinP« Park applicakioa site Number #RZ-89-1• SIB I-89-5 Dale December 20 1QRQ .......... zoning boundary Request Rezone Proliminary PlAt .._._ cilylimits VICINITY MAP SGALE — r = 1000' .CITY OF DENT planning � "fit +ly .�I��, +� ��� � � ° sG.w�a�(■"""'.`�� p.., mo I Q r� r- _Tit 00 � r�y1t 0 o r-t 11.9 9 •.. F-' .23.3 '\ �'• ...•.• �.� ••♦•? . .: •:. fit::::::::::•:.-v.:;_�:4?:4'.:}?:!•. ..y.•.�.;x . IN cp ales +l{Y?{�:�:{^:•'• .•: ..::'::':':'??;.�]x.-• r • c . •�. :•::. •?:�::. _'i.9•'.; .z..i.. o �......?..z l / l APPLICATION Name Eastbrook Business Park LEGEND — Number #RZ-89-1 ; su-89-5 Date Dec ember 20,_)9Rq application site Ro�nno • P/"P� lmlilA l^V PI zoning boundary Request .._.. city limits ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP SCALE = 111 = 400' �� .CITY or DENT planni ng a. i s ll I 'g 1d ma6 a 1.V.11 ails \V • { �ti }n 'l � ?l Jill � 1 c l s L N . `ill •r n; j C:• � " I ;5 � N � Ill �• ♦.. i.l I . I, it APPLICATION Name Eastbrook Business Park LEGEND Number #RZ-89-1; SU-89-5 Dale December 20, 1989 appl�calbo site zoning boundary RequeSl Rezone; Preliminary Plat — Clly limits SITE PLAN SALE = No scale PLEASE NOTE: These minutes are prepared only for the convenience of those interested in the proceedings of the Land Use Hearing Examiner. These minutes are not part of the official record of decision and are not viewed, referred to, or relied upon by the Hearing Examiner in reaching a decision. These minutes also are not part of the record of review in the event a decision of the Hearing Examiner is appealed. Copies of the tape recordings of the Hearing Examiner proceedings, or a complete written transcript of these recordings, are available at a charge from the City of Kent. Please contact Chris Holden at the Kent Planning Department (859-3390) if you are interested in obtaining an official transcript. HEARING EXAMINER MINUTES December 20, 1989 The public hearing of the Kent Hearing Examiner was called to order by the presiding officer, Ted Hunter, Hearing Examiner, on Wednesday, December 20, 1989 at 3 : 00 p.m. in the Kent City Hall, Council Chambers . Mr. Hunter requested all those intending to speak at the hearing and those wishing to receive information concerning the hearing, to sign in at the sign up sheet by the door. Staff reports and agendas were available by the door. Mr. Hunter briefly described the sequence and procedure of the hearing. Each person presenting testimony was sworn in by Mr. Hunter prior to giving testimony. EASTBROOK BUSINESS PARK Rezone #RZ-89-1 A public hearing to consider the request submitted by KPFF Consulting Engineers, 1201 Third Avenue, Suite #900, Seattle, WA 98101, for a rezone of approximately 38 acres from M2 , Limited Industrial, to M1, Industrial Park. The property is located east of 80th Avenue S . , between S . 180th and S. 188th. Scott Williams, Planning Department, presented the staff report. Mr. Williams presented some view foils depicting 1) the location of the property, and 2) the current zoning of the site as well as the surrounding zoning. A brief video of the site was shown. Mr. Williams submitted to the record (Exhibit 2) applicant' s requested change to recommended Condition A. 1 Hearing Examiner Minutes December 20 , 1989 Mr. Hunter asked if the Public Works Department would like to comment on this requested change. Ed White, Assistant Transportation Engineer, gave a brief explanation of the corridor mitigation process. Mr. White commented the fees were based on the City paying 50 percent of the cost of the corridor and the developer/property owner paying the other 50 percent. Mr. White remarked that when a zoning change is requested, the developer/owner is assessed the entire cost of those trips that exceed the trips generated under the current zoning. Mr. Williams stated the staff is recommending approval with conditions. Mr. Hunter asked if the applicant would like to comment. Don Corson, Project Director for Glacier Park Company, felt this was an appropriate rezone request based on the current development in the area. Mark Stiefel, KPFF Consulting Engineers, requested approval of the clarification language shown in Exhibit 2 related to the mitigation measures recommended by the City. There was no public testimony. The hearing was closed at 3 : 25 p.m. EASTBROOK BUSINESS PARK Preliminary Plat #SU-89-5 A public hearing to consider the request submitted by KPFF Consulting Engineers, 1201 Third Avenue, Suite #900, Seattle, WA 98101, for an 11-lot preliminary plat. The property is located east of 80th Avenue S . , between S. 180th and S. 188th. Scott Williams, Planning Department, submitted to the record a letter requesting rewording of condition A.E (Exhibit 2) . Mr. Williams commented one of the conditions of the preliminary plat is that 80th Avenue S . is to be widened to 58 feet from an existing width of 44 feet. The applicant is requesting that a traffic study be completed prior to that widening to determine if the widening is necessary. Mr. Williams provided staff comments on the signage that would be allowed for some of the lots. Mr. Williams showed on the view foil 2 KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF DECEMBER 20, 1989 FILE NO: EASTBROOK BUSINESS PARK #RZ-89-1 APPLICANT: KPFF Consulting Engineers REQUEST: A request for a rezone from M2 , Limited Industrial, to M1, Industrial Park. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Scott Williams STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL with conditions I . GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal The proposal is to rezone approximately 36 acres from M2 , Limited Industrial, to M1, Industrial Park. The applicant is also seeking approval of a preliminary plat to divide the subject property into 11 lots. B. Location The subject property is located east of 80th Avenue S . , between S. 180th Street and S . 188th Street. C. Size of Property The subject property is approximately 38 acres in size. D. Zoning The zoning on the subject property currently is M1, Industrial Park, and M2 , Limited Industrial. Only the northernmost portion of the subject property is currently zoned Ml. If the rezone is approved, the zoning on the remainder of the site would change to M1. The primary difference between the two zones is that M1 includes office uses as a principally permitted use. In the M2 zoning district, these are conditional uses when they occupy more than 25 percent of the gross floor area of a single or multibuilding development. Development standards for setbacks and landscaping are also more restrictive in the M1 zone. 1 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-69-1 E. Comprehensive Plan The City of Kent first adopted a City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan in 1969 . The goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan represent an expression of community intentions and aspirations concerning the future of Kent and the area within the Sphere of Interest. The Comprehensive Plan is used by the Mayor, City Council, City Administrator, Planning Commission, Hearing Examiner and City departments to guide growth, development, and spending decisions. Residents, land developers, business representatives and others may refer to the plan as a statement of the City' s intentions concerning future development. The City of Kent has also adopted subarea plans that address specific concerns of certain areas of the City. Like the City-wide Plan, the subarea plans serve as policy guides for future land use in the City of Kent. CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the subject property as I , Industrial . Elements of the Comprehensive Plan are addressed below followed by Planning Department comments. ECONOMIC ELEMENT OVERALL GOAL: PROMOTE CONTROLLED ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ORDERLY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT, RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION. GOAL l: Promote diverse industrial development in industrially developed areas. Policy 2 : Promote industrial subdivisions. Planning Department Comment: The subject property is located between West Valley Highway and East Valley Highway. The surrounding area is zoned and developed with industrial uses. The proposed rezone would allow more flexibility in the allowed uses, thus creating the possibility for a more diverse development then would be allowed under the 2 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 current zoning. The proposed rezone is, therefore, consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. VALLEY FLOOR PLAN The Valley Floor Plan Map designates the west half of the subject property as I, Industrial and the east half as IP, Industrial Park. Elements of the Valley Floor Plan are addressed below and followed by the Kent Planning Department finding. ECONOMIC ELEMENT OVERALL GOAL: PROMOTE CONTROLLED ECONOMIC GROWTH WITH ORDERLY PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT, RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND PRESERVATION. GOAL 1: Promote fill-in development of industrially developed area. Planning Department Comment The subject property is located in an area that is characterized by industrial development. As such, the proposed rezone is considered fill-in development, which would prevent sprawl and is, therefore, consistent with this portion of the Plan. II . HISTORY A. Site History The subject property has been mostly vacant for some time. The house and barn that are located on the eastern edge of the site indicate the remainder of the subject property was most recently used for agricultural purposes. B. Area History The subject property is part of a 2 ,990 acre area that was annexed to the City in February 1959 under Ordinance 1013 . In the mid-1960 ' s, industrial development began in earnest in the Valley. Today, relatively few parcels as large as the subject property remain undeveloped. 3 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 III. LAND USE Land uses in the area are predominantly industrial. A more specific discussion of surrounding land uses occurs below: A. The applicant has an approved preliminary plat to subdivide 66 acres into 21 lots directly to the west of the subject property (Westbrook Business Park) . B. Some relatively small lots directly to the north and east and south of the subject property are undeveloped, but development proposals are pending for at least two of them. C. Land uses in the general area are mostly industrial in all directions . IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS A. Environmental Assessment A final Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance (#ENV-89-33) was issued for the rezone on October 20, 1989 with the following conditions : 1. Biofiltration shall be incorporated into the master drainage control plan for the plat. 2 . For any floodway fringe areas being filled as part of the grade and fill operation, offsetting storage shall be provided for 50% of the volume filled. 3 . Provide a as-built field topographical survey by a Washington State licenced land surveyor denoting the location of Springbrook Creek in relation to the subject property. For the portion of the creek lying within the subject property, grant to the City an easement for drainage utility purposes of same. The width of said easement shall extend 15-feet landward from the top of channel bank (both sides) , in order to accommodate channel access maintenance roads. 4 . Provide a detailed engineering plan to the City for review and approval denoting how the operational and 4 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 maintenance requirements of the Springbrook Creek channel, as determined by the City and Drainage District #1, will be achieved, and construct improvements. 5. Acquire approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington State Department of Fisheries, and King County Drainage District #1 prior to any work in or around Springbrook Creek. 6. Provide a habitat inventory of the Westbrook and Eastbrook sites. Said inventory should detail impacts to the observed red tailed hawk and other wildlife present on the sites, and provide mitigation for same. B. Significant Physical Features 1. Topography and Vegetation The site is flat and is covered mostly with grasses and some trees. Springbrook Creek flows generally along the eastern edge of the subject property. Some wetlands are located along the western edge of the site. The applicant proposes to mitigate filling the wetlands by creating manmade wetlands on the site located across the street. These manmade wetlands are to mitigate the filling of wetlands on the Eastbrook and Westbrook sites. There is a single family residence and barn located on the subject property. They are located in an area designated for open space. The property will be deeded to the City. There are no plans to raze the structures. C. Significant Social Features 1. Street System The subject property has access to 80th Avenue S . , which is classified as a collector arterial. The street has a public right-of-way width of 60 feet. The actual width of paving on the street is 40 feet. The street is improved with two lanes of asphalt paving and curb and gutter. New left-turn pockets 5 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 will be required for the two cul-de-sacs proposed to serve the site. 2 . Water System An existing 12-inch water main located in 80th Avenue SE at the southern property line is available to serve the subject property. 3 . Sanitary Sewer System There is a 72-inch Metro sewer main in 80th Avenue S . to serve the subject property. 4 . Storm Water System The applicant will be required to design and construct a system to collect, detain and treat storm water prior to discharging it into the City system. This will be required as part of the preliminary plat request for this property. 5 . LID' s None at the present time. V. CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments and agencies were advised of this application: City Administrator City Attorney Director of Public Works Chief of Police Parks & Recreation Director Fire Chief Building Official City Clerk Drainage District #1 Army Corps of Engineers Department of Ecology Washington Department of Transportation In addition to the above, all persons owning property which lies within 300 feet of the site were notified of the application and of the public hearing. Staff comments and concerns have been incorporated into the staff report where applicable. 6 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 VI. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW The Planning Department has reviewed this application in relation to the Comprehensive Plan, present zoning, PUD ordinance, Subdivision Code, land use, street system, flood control problems and comments from other departments and finds that: A. The City-wide Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site as I, Industrial . B. The Valley Floor Plan Map designates the site as I, Industrial and IP, Industrial Park. C. The site is presently zoned M1, Industrial Park, and M2 , Limited Industrial . D. Land uses in the area are predominantly industrial. E. A mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on October 20, 1989 . F. The site is flat and covered with native grasses and some trees . Springbrook Creek flows along the eastern portion of the subject property. G. The site has access to 80th Avenue S. H. There is an existing 12-inch water main and an existing 72-inch sewer main in 80th Avenue S. to serve the site. VII . STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR A REZONE REQUEST The following standards and criteria (Kent Zoning Code, Section 15. 09 . 050) shall be used by the Hearing Examiner and City Council to evaluate a request for a rezone. Such an amendment shall only be granted if the City Council determines that the request is consistent with these standards and criteria. A. The proposed rezone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 7 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 Planning Department Comment: As discussed above, the proposed rezone is consistent with the intent of both the City-wide Comprehensive Plan and the Valley Floor Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed rezone and subsequent development of the site would be compatible with development in the vicinity. Planning Department Comment: The surrounding land uses are predominantly industrial . All of the surrounding land is zoned for industrial uses. The applicant is proposing to develop the property directly to the west of the subject property with M2 uses. The subject property would be developed with uses that are compatible to the surrounding ones. C. The proposed rezone will not unduly burden the transportation system in the vicinity of the property with significant adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated. Planning Department Comment: Rezoning the subject property from M2 to M1 will allow heavier traffic generating office uses to be developed on the property. However, with the recommended conditions below, it is expected that the immediate impacts of the rezone can be mitigated. Development of each lot will be required to go through the SEPA review process. Long term impacts to the transportation system in the area resulting from the build-out of the site will be mitigated through this process. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) sent a comment letter in response to the rezone application. WSDOT staff is concerned about the impacts the project will have on State intersections in the area . The intersections with which WSDOT staff is specifically concerned are SR 167/South 180th Street and SR 181/South 180th Street . WSDOT recommends that a traffic study be done to determine if the proposed rezone will add ten or more vehicles trips to the above mentioned State intersections . If this is found to 8 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 be true, WSDOT recommends that a traffic analysis be completed to determine if any mitigation measures are necessary to alleviate the impacts of the proposed project. D. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current zoning district to warrant the proposed change. Planning Department Comment: The applicant cites a change in market forces as the reason for the proposed rezone. According to the applicant, the demand for Industrial Park type uses (e.g. , office and warehouse/distribution uses) has increased since the establishment of the current zoning on the property. The two zoning districts (i.e. , M1 and M2) are similar in most respects. The Zoning Code states that the purpose of the M2 district is to "provide areas suitable for a broad range of industrial activities whose characteristics are of a light industrial nature. The permitted uses are similar to those of the Industrial Park District but the development standards (in M2) are not as restrictive. " The major difference between the M1 and M2 zoning districts is that office uses are allowed outright in the M1 district. In the M2 , they require a conditional use permit when the use occupies more than 25 percent of a single or multibuilding development. Conditional uses in the M2 zoning district allow more intensive industrial uses than would be allowed in the M1 zone. However, the principally permitted industrial uses allowed are identical in both zoning districts. Other differences between the two are the development standards (i. e. , setbacks, landscaping, signage, etc. ) . In terms of these standards, the M1 zone is more restrictive than the M2 (i. e. , larger setbacks, more required landscaping, less allowed signage) . The Planning Department has recognized the change in the market place in the recent past by adopting changes in the Zoning Code through the West Valley Study. The changes applied to properties in the M1 zone and included allowing office uses as principally permitted, created potential commercial nodes at specific intersections, and changed some development standards including setbacks and screening of loading areas. 9 Staff Report Eastbrook Business Park #RZ-89-1 Approval of the rezone would allow development of properties in a way to respond more favorably to the change in market since the original zoning was established. Development standards will be greater in the M1 zone. The uses are potentially lighter from a land use view point. E. The proposed rezone will not adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent. Planning Department Comment: The health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Kent was considered by staff in preparation of this staff report and will be considered during the evaluation of specific development proposals for the subject property. No adverse impacts which cannot be mitigated are anticipated as a result of the proposed rezone . VIII . CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the merits of this request and the Code criteria for granting a rezone the City staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed rezone subject to the following conditions: Recommended Conditions for Approval of the Rezone: A. When an applicant/developer elects to mitigate impacts versus a traffic study to the City ' s transportation system for a development on the subject property by execution of a corridor participation agreement, those trips that exceed what would be allowed under the M2 zone shall be charged at a rate equal to 100 percent of the cost, versus the normal 50 percent rate. B. Conduct a traffic study to determine if the proposed rezone will add ten or more vehicle trips to the intersections of SR 167/S . 180th Street and/or SR 181/S . 180th Street. If this is found to be true, conduct a traffic analysis to determine measures necessary to mitigate the impacts. KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT December 11 , 1989 10 CITY OF DENT planning. 1 , R E N T 0 N Q- I81 I (S 180TH ST) SW . 43RD ST VdI : .,.. I l 1',1.ti •� 0 �7 1.)•1-110"Jt l7.1. -11011 MrMa=B M a m a m171T1111-9-M"r ?3 KENT CITY LIMITS / r-1 1 S 4 7ORILLlj4 181ST CSCHO L. ST (VAC) . 1'. �. ` p 5 ST / 162ND P 1 i• a 1 N H ST ' 5 188TH W � 1 i ST I _ 190TH ST C 80rh z pl S N $ S 192ND ST o, ' ST 1 = O i i m I I 5 194TH ST 1 196TH ST ' t i 1 1 6I Y _ � r m m S 200TH ST • T APPLICATION Namc Eastbrook Business Park LEGEND .Number nerember 20 ,g ....... � application site #RZ-89-1 ���_Rq_� Dale � zoning boundary RequeRi Re7nne- Preliminary Plat cil Noma- y limits VICINITY MAP SCALE = 111 = 1 000, � CITY OF HENT planning . f "lt)f u y maxi t it �v�...rr �/ � ��=i����■■IC■�■'� � P-- c Fr(D ,23.2 ■ L,J .°° 8°.• too I 0 �■�L —� ,n.z n .10 J r 22.6 .211 _ L 9 ,xJ.9 .23.2 — — � :: �` •••�•• o l .zz. .22.9 :::'C. •:. .i..t ••t' .21.7 °°OCR 0 e b .I r.J :•:•P:: I• { •:;:•;• ;..{ .• .?.:..••. .3;I .:.. X. •ar,:: •::: .i.1 ° ::'::':'.. ......... ........ .23 R 1.t •.•L2.4•:1::'••:Val:•.:•--::•'�•••��'Y . r oon .z1.1 � L:� .z1® ® �azJ•,�• ••�� J� a Qp =/ u a32.9 II /I% / ♦23 2 / l ��� Appt.lGAT10N Name Eastbrook Business Park LEGEND application site .Number #RZ-89-1 > SU-89-5 Date December 20 19EL Ming houndary Request RP7nnP ' Preliminary Plat ■.■■.city limits ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP SGAtE — 1" = 400' CITY OF KENT planni ng. I I I i I � S \ F 1 J � i n . j APPLICATION Name Eastbrook Business Park LEGEND .Number #11-89-1 ; Su-89-5 pate December 20, 1989 application site Request Rezone; Preliminary Plat zoning boundary city limits SITE PLAN SCALE = No scale Kent City Council Meeting 1 � /v Date February 6 , 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: CANTERBURY PLACE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION NO. SU-89-4 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: This public meeting will consider the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of conditional approval of an application by Baima and Holmberg, Inc. for a 15 lot single family residential subdivision. The property is located north of S.E. 248th Street between 98th Ave. So. and proposed 100th Ave. So. (extended) . 3.r XHIB emo,;_staff report, minutes, findings and mendation 4 RECO DE;.RY:, Hear ra�ct Examiner December. 20 1989 �`..- Comm -ttee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) Approval with 10 conditions 5l. UNBUDGETED FISCAL4FERSO , EL IMPACT:. NQ_ YES FISCA .PRILSONNEL NOTE: Recommended Not Recommended _ 6. EXP,BNDTURE REQUIRED: $, N/A `SOURCE bF FUNDS 7 . kIT'Y `COUNCIL ACTION! h -� nci�nrem�er 1T VIA move, Councilmember seconds To a - a •• + ' xamaner: T * - ©— d ptj-re-�� the Hearing Examiner's recommendation of - �- conditional approval of Canterbury Place Preliminary Subdivision No. SU-89-4 . DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4B `1_6 KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT February 1, 1990 MEMO TO: Mayor Dan Kelleher and City Council Members FROM: James P. Harris, Planning Director SUBJECT: CANTERBURY PLACE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION #SU-89-4 On December 6, 1989 the Kent Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider a request by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. for a 15-lot single family residential preliminary subdivision. The subject property is located north of SE 248th Street between 98th Avenue South and proposed 100th Avenue South (extended) . On December 20, 1989 the Hearing Examiner recommended approval of the Canterbury Place Preliminary Subdivision #SU-89-4 with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the recordation of the plat, the applicant shall comply with all conditions of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance as entered on October 20, 1989 except for Condition 3 which is specifically modified herein and now by removal of the hyphenated words "on-site" . The detention and biofiltration for the proposed subdivision may be provided by the detention/biofiltration facility this same developer proposes to construct within the Canterbury subdivision at the northeast corner of 100th Avenue SE and SE 248th Street, if the City so approves it. 2 . The applicant shall obtain City approval of detailed engineering drawings for the following improvements, and either construct and/or bond for the same: a. Storm System: Provide storm water detention in accordance with City Drainage Code and provide public storm drainage facilities within all public roadways and roadway improvements required as a condition of this subdivision. b. Sanitary Sewer: Provide City gravity sanitary sewer system to service all lots. Extend sanitary sewers along 98th Avenue S . and along 100th Avenue SE to the north property line of the plat. C. Water: Construct City water main on 100th Avenue SE from the north property line of this plat to the south property line. The size thereof shall be in accordance with that specified in the City Water Comprehensive Plan. These improvements are a portion of those required for the Canterbury and Eastwood subdivisions will not be necessary if those projects proceed. Extend the City water main internal into the plat to provide domestic water service and fire flow capabilities to all lots. A minimum six-inch main is required. TO MAYOR DAN KELLEHER AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FEBRUARY 1, 1990 d. Internal Streets: Improve internal roadway system to residential access road standards (i.e. , curb and gutter, minimum five foot sidewalks , street lighting, asphalt pavement (minimum roadway width 28 feet curb to curb) , underground utilities, drainage, street signs, and related appurtenances) . Dedicate adequate right of way to accommodate 25 foot radius curb returns at intersections. e. 100th Avenue SE: Dedicate the easterly 30 feet of the subject property as right of way for 100th Avenue SE and improve the west half of the roadway to collector street standards (18 feet from centerline to curb, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage facilities, underground utilities and related appurtenances) . f. On 98th Avenue S . , improvements shall include a half-street pavement width of 16 feet with curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, underground utilities and related appurtenances. Widen the west half of 98th Avenue S . to 12 feet in width and partially overlay same to property feather the asphalt surfacing of the new section to the existing asphalt pavement. g. Install street identification signs with location, size and message as approved by the Building Department. B. Prior to or in conjunction with the issuance of any development permit- 1. Provide a comprehensive, accurate tree plan for each lot, showing all trees of six-inch caliper or greater. The plan should also show the trees in relationship to any proposed structure. 2 . Provide minimum fire flow of 1 , 000 gallons per minute at 20 psi at approved locations. Fire hydrants shall meet the required 600 foot spacing. CA:JPH:ca 2 CITY 01 DENT planning.. 'k- , L jV as 12 11 10 uo.'1�• t.y J11116111 o J• r`1 S + t �1 1. lk tL`L. t.rCr APPLlCAT1DN Name Canterbury Place �ECEND Number #Su-89-4 Data December 6, 1989 application site Subdivision zoning boundary Requcsl city limits SITE PLAN SCAtE = No scale FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THE CITY OF KENT FILE NO: CANTERBURY PLACE #SU-89-4 APPLICANT: Baima & Holmberg, Inc. REQUEST: A request for a preliminary subdivision approval of 15 sngle-family residential lots. LOCATION: The subject property is located north of SE 248th Street between 98th Avenue S . and proposed 100 Avenue S. (extended) . APPLICATION FILED: 8/31/89 DEC. OF NONSIGNIFICANCE ISSUED: 10/20/89 MEETING DATE: 12/6/89 RECOMMENDATION ISSUED: 12/20/89 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL with conditions STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Fred N. Satterstrom, Planning Department Kathy McClung, Planning Department Carol Proud, Planning Department Gary Gill , Public Works Department PUBLIC TESTIMONY: David Halinen ShupeHolmberg WRITTEN TESTIMONY: None INTRODUCTION After due consideration of all the evidence presented at public hearing on the date indicated above, and following an unaccompanied personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding area by the Hearing Examiner at a time prior to the public hearing, the following findings, conclusions and recommendation are entered by the Hearing Examiner on this application. 1 Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 FINDINGS 1. The applicant proposes to subdivide 4 . 5 acres into 15 single family lots. The subject property is located north of SE 248th Street between 98th Avenue S. and proposed 100th Avenue South. The average lot size would be 10, 600 square feet with a range from 9 , 600 to 11, 648 square feet. 2 . The subject property is located in an R1-9 . 6, Single-Family Residential zoning district. The City-wide Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site as SF, Single-Family. The East Hill Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site as SF 6, Single- Family with 4 to 6 units per acre. 3 . Land use in the surrounding area is primarily single-family residential . The property immediately to the east is currently undeveloped forest land but is the site of a recently approved single-family subdivision. The land to the south across S . 248th Street is developed with multi-family residences. 4 . Access to the site would be available from 98th Avenue S. and a proposed extension of 100th Avenue SE. Improvements to both of these streets are necessary to assure public safety. 5 . The site has access to City water and sewer lines in the vicinity which can adequately serve the proposed use of the site. 6 . A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for this proposal on October 20, 1989 . Conditions related to traffic improvements and storm water drainage were applied by the City at that time. The applicant raised no objection to those conditions within the time-frame allowed for comment on the proposed conditions. The applicant at the public hearing on this application did raise an objection to the assessment of fair costs associated with traffic improvements. The applicant also objected to the requirement of on-site detention of storm water stating that the need to control storm water runoff could be met by off-site detention ponds on adjacent properties if developed properly. These objections are addressed in the Conclusions below. 7 . No one testified in opposition to the applicant ' s proposal and no letters of objection were received. 2 Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 CONCLUSIONS 1. The application generally complies with the preliminary plat requirements specified in Section 2 . 3 .2 of the Kent Subdivision Code in effect at the time the application was made. 2 . Conditions to approval similar to those specified on pages 10, 11 and 12 of the City Planning Department report dated November 21, 1989 are reasonable and necessary to meet the purposes of the Kent Subdivision Code specified in Section 1.2 of that Code. 3 . The dollar amounts objected to by the applicant relating to a possible LID assessment for traffic improvements should not be changed at this time for two reasons: (1) the applicant could have objected at the time the dollar amount was first applied during the SEPA review but failed to do so and (2) the dollar amount may change if and when an LID is applied to the subject property. DECISION It is recommended by the Hearing Examiner that the application for preliminary subdivision approval be APPROVED subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the recordation of the plat, the applicant shall comply with all conditions of the Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance as entered on October 20, 1989 except for Condition 3 which is specifically modified herein and now by removal of the hyphenated words "on-site" . The detention and biofiltration for the proposed subdivision may be provided by the detention/biofiltration facility this same developer proposes to construct within the Canterbury subdivision at the northeast corner of 100th Avenue SE and SE 248th Street, if the City so approves it. 2 . The applicant shall obtain City approval of detailed engineering drawings for the following improvements, and either construct and/or bond for the same: a. Storm System: Provide storm water detention in accordance with City Drainage Code and provide public storm drainage facilities within all public roadways and roadway improvements required as a condition of this subdivision. 3 Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Canterbury Place 4SU-89-4 b. Sanitary Sewer: Provide City gravity sanitary sewer system to service all lots. Extend sanitary sewers along 98th Avenue S. and along 100th Avenue SE to the north property line of the plat. C. Water: Construct City water main on 100th Avenue SE from the north property line of this plat to the south property line. The size thereof shall be in accordance with that specified in the City Water Comprehensive Plan. These improvements are a portion of those required for the Canterbury and Eastwood subdivisions will not be necessary if those projects proceed. Extend the City water main internal into the plat to provide domestic water service and fire flow capabilities to all lots. A minimum six-inch main is required. d. Internal Streets: Improve internal roadway system to residential access road standards (i.e. , curb and gutter, minimum five foot sidewalks, street lighting, asphalt pavement (minimum roadway width 28 feet curb to curb) , underground utilities, drainage, street signs, and related appurtenances) . Dedicate adequate right of way to accommodate 25 foot radius curb returns at intersections. e. 100th Avenue SE: Dedicate the easterly 30 feet of the subject property as right of way for 100th Avenue SE and improve the west half of the roadway to collector street standards (18 feet from centerline to curb, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage facilities, underground utilities and related appurtenances) . f. On 98th Avenue S. , improvements shall include a half- street pavement width of 16 feet with curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, underground utilities and related appurtenances. Widen the west half of 98th Avenue S. to 12 feet in width and partially overlay same to property feather the asphalt surfacing of the new section to the existing asphalt pavement. g. Install street identification signs with location, size and message as approved by the Building Department. 4 Hearing Examiner Findings and Recommendation Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 B. Prior to or in conjunction with the issuance of anV development permit• 1. Provide a comprehensive, accurate tree plan for each lot, showing all trees of six-inch caliper or greater. The plan should also show the trees in relationship to any proposed structure. 2 . Provide minimum fire flow of 1, 00o gallons per minute at 20 psi at approved locations. Fire hydrants shall meet the required 600 foot spacing. Dated this 20th day of December, 1989 . 0��_jAg§j; THEODORE PAUL HUNTER Hearing Examiner APPEALS FROM HEARING EXAMINER DECISIONS . Request of Reconsideration Any aggrieved person may request a reconsideration of a decision by the Hearing Examiner if either (a) a specific error of fact, law, or judgment can be identified or (b) new evidence is available which was not available at the time of the hearing. Reconsideration requests should be addressed to: Hearing Examiner, 220 Fourth Avenue S. , Kent, WA 98032 . Reconsiderations are answered in writing by the Hearing Examiner. Notice of Right to Appeal The decision of the Hearing Examiner is final unless a written appeal to the Council is filed by a party within 14 days of the decision. The appeal must be filed with the City Clerk. Usually, new information cannot be raised on appeal . All relevant information and arguments should be presented at the public hearing before the City Council . A recommendation by the Hearing Examiner to the City Council can also be appealed. A recommendation is sent to the City Council for a final decision; however, a public hearing is not held unless an appeal is filed. 5 CITY. OF KENT planning. 1' rt • 1,--1 l �'s ..� ___ � ` ,f% ' � � /J l• ,r �� 1 _ - � / ��� ` 1p ° o ` 1 ID \ r-= J 1Ti fr14�4'�4'fY H J 1 Z. Y�.I• . Q 5 „ n it�I I ❑•J1`p 1 u I u PU Canterbury Place LEGEND APPLICATION Name �: applicatioo site Number #SU-89-4 Date December 6, 1989_ 1 _.._.0 zoning boundary ftegneS� Subdivision city limits ZONING / TOPOGRAPHY MAP SCALE = 1" = 4001 '� CITY OF KENT planning. Q ar ) 14 1 12 j 11 1 \10 am rL c.r j Yj bj SO&C r-i APPLICATION Name Canterbury Place LEGEND Numher #SU-89-4 Dale December 6, 1989 application site Subdivision zoning boundary Request city limits SITE PLAN SCALE = No scale -�- CITY OF KENT planning. ■SE 232ND ST N SE Q+ ST .' ST ■ SE 232ND PL 232ND > PL SE 233R0 a( fN ■ y 'h a .� b SE 236TH ST -t S S i of O v S 236TH tt■��t�■tt�t ■tom 'l rn (pyt) <• ST uWi I N SE 236TH PL - Grb�i J SE 237TH $T Iif, W ■ t m■ < u d _ °Y < I',� ■ o E 23BTH m J ■ _ w (Pvt) SE 23`9TH 4. S238TH L. ■ U :� > r w ST W 0 1]23�h' t ■tom t t■■ Z TPL m 1 ZSE OTH S 24 ST m .• W fIl >• F'1 > EAST HILL 5 2415T ST ¢ Ta ELEMENTARY O W m SCHOOL < < e CS L24ND¢ ti ST n f � $ 243RD Z 7 ST SE 244TH i Sr 51244TH h p w _ S N ST > r w a > C W < ST.JAMES < SCHOOL m WEILAND 2 W S 246THPL < 1� H'. L J OR ST ~ ~ W w pC fC' v' P P < S 248TH ST SE 248TH ST .T �• 3LYN 5T = > < ST J < E SEATTL '^� y.+ i ' 2 E ST T w d �•1. IJ\� . . 516 0 CHICAGO ST ��� `Jr�ti S 252NC T SE 252 !`�Y:AJr7~�� EAST HILL LAUREL ST < OO 'S �y'�c� '-' CENTER = . e n -,n $E 25270 1 T Canterbury Place LEGEND APPLICATION Name Number #SU-89-4 Dale December 6, 1989 application site . zoning boundary Request Subdivisioncity limits �....I VICINTIY MAP SCALE = 1" = 1000i -ot- Hearing Examiner Minutes December 6, 1989 Ron Austen commented this operation is both an in-house and mobile facility. Mr. Austen remarked that certain types of vehicle maintenancemust be done on-site. In order to properly serve the consumer the business needs to provide the options of on-site or in-house repair. Mr. Austen commented a covered work area is necessary when repairing glass on a vehicle. Further, it is estimated that four to eight vehicles a day will be worked on. There was no further testimony. The public hearing was closed at 3 : 35 p.m. CANTERBURY PLACE Preliminary Plat #SU-89-4 A public hearing to consider the request by Baima & Holmberg, Inc. , 1505 NW Gilman Boulevard #7 , Issaquah, WA 98027 , for approval of a 15-lot single-family residential subdivision. The site is zoned R1-9 . 6, Single-Family Residential, and is 4 . 5 acres in size. The project is located north of SE 248th Street between 98th Avenue S . and proposed 100th Avenue S . (extended) . Carol Proud, City of Kent Planner, presented the staff report. Ms. Proud showed some transparencies depicting 1) the site plan of the subdivision; 2) the location of the property; and 3) zoning of the property as well as surrounding zoning. A brief video of the site was shown. Ms. Proud gave a brief history of the property and area. Ms. Proud commented on the development standards required by this subdivision including, but not limited to, storm and tree retention. The staff recommends approval with conditions. Mr. Hunter asked if the applicant would like to comment. David Halinen, 376 Bellevue Place, 800 Bellevue Way NE, Bellevue 98004 , attorney representing developer, concurred with the staff report except to the following. Mr. Halinen believed there is a math error on page 7 IV.A. 1. Traffic impact mitigation was estimated as $20, 292 . It should have been based on 14 additional peak hour trips at the rate of $1, 068 per trip, for a total estimated minimum benefit of $14 , 952 . Mr. Hunter asked if this point was raised during the SEPA process . 3 Hearing Examiner Minutes December 6, 1989 Mr. Halinen commented that it wasn't. Mr. Halinen further requested that on page 10 of the staff report, there be a language change on the first recommended condition 8 . 1. Mr. Halinen submitted to the record the requested language change. Shupe Holmberg, 1505 NW Gilman Boulevard V, Issaquah, WA 98027 , commented on the proposed storm water detention system. Mr. Holmberg commented the intention is to tie the proposed plat into the storm water detention system planned for the Canterbury and Eastbrook plats. These plats are owned by the same person. Therefore, it is requested that the language change submitted by Mr. Halinen be used in place of that language used in the staff report. Mr. Holmberg stated the applicant is requesting that the improvement limits to 98th Avenue S. be defined on page 5 of the staff report to state that the improvements will abut the property or be limited to property frontage. Mr. Halinen requested that the words "on-site" under condition 2 .A. on page 11 be stricken. Mr. Halinen requested an explanation from City Engineer Gary Gill of page 12 , 2 . F. the request for widening the western half of 98th Avenue S . to 12 feet, since the applicant is already making a 16-foot wide improvement. Gary Gill, City of Kent City Engineer, commented on the questions regarding the traffic mitigations. The City has no objections to that correcting the math error; quite often there are minor corrections that need to be made to traffic mitigations and cost; usually these are corrected at the time the agreement is signed. Mr. Gill commented there would not be a problem with having this storm detention system tied in with the other subdivisions. Mr. Gill requested that the condition regarding street widening improvements to 98th not be amended. Mr. Halinen withdrew the objection to the street improvements. There was no further testimony The public hearing closed at 4 : 05 p.m. 4 KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR HEARING EXAMINER MEETING OF DECEMBER 61 1989 FILE NO: CANTERBURY PLACE #SU-89-4 APPLICANT: Baima & Holmberg, Inc. REOUEST: A request for preliminary subdivision approval of 15 single-family residential lots. STAFF REPRESENTATIVE: Carol Proud STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS I . GENERAL INFORMATION A. Description of the Proposal The proposal is for the subdivision of a 4 .5 acre parcel into 15 single-family lots. The average lot size is 10, 600 square feet with the largest lot being 11, 648 square feet and the smallest lot being 9 , 600 square feet. The resulting subdivision will provide for 15 detached single- family homes at a density of approximately 3 . 1 units per acre. B. Location The subject property is located north of SE 248th Street between . 98th Avenue S. and proposed 100th Avenue S . (extended) . C. Size of Property The property is 4 . 5 acres in size. D. Zoning The proposed subdivision site is within an R1-9 . 6, Single- Family Residential, zoning district (minimum lot size of 9 , 600 square feet) . Property directly north, west and the adjacent parcel to the south is also zoned R1-9 . 6. The property to the east is zoned R1-7 .2 , Single-Family 1 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 Residential , with an O, Professional and Office, district beyond along 104th Avenue SE. To the south and southwest across SE 248th Street the zoning is MRM, Medium Density Multifamily Residential . All lots meet or exceed the minimum lot size and width as specified in the development standards for the R1-9 . 6 zoning district. Solar access setback regulations will apply to all lots . The purpose of the solar access setback provisions is to provide a reasonable amount of solar access to lots in the City so that the economic value of solar radiation falling on those properties will be preserved and the option to use solar energy will be encouraged. Any structures built on the lots in a residential zone must maintain solar access to the adjacent lots to the north. It appears that adequate north/south dimensions are available on the undeveloped lots to meet solar regulations. The Tree Preservation Ordinance requires that all trees located on the property having a caliper of six-inches or greater must be identified on a tree plan. The ordinance specifies that every effort shall be made to retain all such trees where practical . E. Subdivision Code The purpose of the City of Kent Subdivision Code is to provide rules , regulations, requirements, and standards for subdividing land in the City of Kent, ensuring that the highest feasible quality in subdivision will be attained; that the public health, safety, general welfare, and aesthetics of the City of Kent shall be promoted and protected; that orderly growth, development, and the conservation, protection and proper use of land shall be ensured; that proper provisions for all public facilities (including circulation, utilities, and services) shall be taken into consideration; that conformance with provisions set forth in the City of Kent Zoning Code and Kent Comprehensive Plan shall be ensured. Planning Department Comment: The proposed plat is in general conformance with the regulations of the Subdivision Code. Streets conform to 2 Staff Report Canterbury Place WSU-89-4 the circulation pattern established in the area' and all proposed sewers, water mains, and other utilities will comply with applicable City requirements- F. Comprehensive Plan The City of Kent first adopted a City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan in 1969 . The goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan represent an expression of community intentions and aspirations concerning the future of Kent and the area within the Sphere of Interest. The Comprehensive Plan is used by the Mayor, City Council, City Administrator, Planning Commission, Hearing Examiner and City departments to guide growth, development and spending decisions. Residents, land developers, business representatives and others may refer to the plan as a statement of the City' s intentions concerning future development. The City of Kent has also adopted a number of subarea plans that address specific concerns of certain areas of the City. Like the City-wide Plan, the subarea plans serve as policy guides for future land use in the City of Kent. This area is served by the East Hill subarea plan. The following is a review of these plans as they relate to the subject property. CITY-WIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The City-wide Comprehensive Plan is made up of two entities: the Comprehensive Plan Map and the written goals, objectives and policies. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site as SF, Single Family. HOUSING ELEMENT OVERALL GOAL: ASSURE A DECENT HOME AND SUITABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT FOR FAMILIES DESIRING TO LIVE IN KENT. GOAL 2 : Guide new residential development into areas where the needed services and facilities are available, and in a manner which is compatible with existing residential neighborhoods . 3 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 Objective 2 : Permit new residential development on the East and West Hills as the necessary facilities and services are available. Planning Department Comment: This Comprehensive Plan goal and objective establishes the City policy of encouraging development of new single- family housing on East Hill . A major distinction in types of housing units is that between multifamily and single- family units. In recent years, multifamily development has far outpaced single-family construction. If approved, this proposal will make available 15 single- family residential lots. This will encourage the production of single-family dwellings and help to restore a balance in the mix of single-family and multifamily housing types. Objective 3 : Guide new residential growth so that it occurs in a responsible manner, consistent with neighborhood objectives. Planning Department Comment: This objective supports the policy which encourages in- fill development of areas already served by utilities and transportation systems to achieve maximum efficiency in the provision of services and preservation of natural features. The subject site is surrounded by existing residential development which has already necessitated the extension of water and sewer service and the construction of other public improvements in the area. If approved, the Canterbury Place subdivision would provide for in-fill development in an already-serviced portion of the City. GOAL 4 : Assure environmental quality in residential areas. Objective 1: Preserve and maintain as much of the natural environment as possible. Policy 2 : Require site design to conserve natural features, such as streams, steep slopes, trees, and wetlands. 4 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 Planning Department Comment: The applicant has submitted a tree plan that shows the location of existing trees on the site in relation to the proposed lots. A few of the trees are located in proposed public right of way and will necessarily have to be removed. It does appear that the trees on proposed lots 1, 2 and 3 could be retained for the benefit of future development. In keeping with the provisions of the tree preservation ordinance and the intent of this goal and policy, prior to approval of a grade and fill permit, the applicant must identify all trees to be retained on the property. EAST HILL PLAN As with the City-wide Comprehensive Plan, the East Hill has two components: the East Hill Plan Map, which designates the site as SF 6, Single Family with 4 to 6 units per acre, and the goals, objectives and policies, some of which are detailed below. HOUSING ELEMENT OVERALL GOAL: ASSURE PRESENT AND FUTURE EAST HILL RESIDENTS HOUSING THAT IS SAFE, OFFERS A DESIRABLE LIVING ENVIRONMENT, AND IS SUPPORTED BY ADEQUATE COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES . GOAL 1: Residential development that is related to the availability of community facilities and services. Objective 1 : When making decisions concerning land use, consider the adequacy of and impact upon roads and other public facilities and services including utilities, police and fire protection, public transportation, schools and parks . Policy 1: Ensure that public facilities and services are available or will be available to support development at proposed densities. 5 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 Policy 2 : Locate new single-family detached residential development in areas and at densities which permit roads, utilities, public transit, schools and other public facilities and services to be provided in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Planning Department Comment: The proposed subdivision may eventually result in the construction of 15 single-family dwellings. Assuming 2 . 9 persons per household, an additional 43 . 5 persons would require City services as a result of development of the plat. Community facilities and services will be available to serve these persons. To ensure adequate fire flows to the site, water quantities and pressures in approved locations must meet Fire Department standards. Fire hydrants should be placed at the required 600 foot spacing. Street signage will be necessary to assist City personnel (including police, fire and medical aid persons) to locate the development. The subject property has access to public transportation. METRO service is available on 104th Avenue SE, within walking distance of the proposed development. If approved, the Canterbury Place plat may contribute to improved transit service as residential densities in the area of bus routes increases. II . HISTORY A. Site and Area History The subject site was part of the East Hill Well Area 2 (Area A) Annexation to the City which occurred in the spring of 1987 . This annexation was the result of the City taking over the water system for customers of the East Hill Well Company. Prior to annexation, the property was zoned SR-7200 under the jurisdiction of King County. Following annexation, an interim R1-20 , Single-family Residential (minimum lot size 20, 000 square feet) , zoning was applied. The present R1-9 . 6, Single-family Residential, zoning was implemented in August 1987 . 6 Staff Report Canterbury Place WSU-89-4 III . LAND USE Land use in the area is almost exclusively residential. 1. The site itself is currently undeveloped except for a single-family rental residence located on proposed lot 15. An accessory garage will be demolished in the event the plat is approved. 2 . The abutting property to the south is developed with a single family residence. On the south side of SE 248th Street are some single-family residences and the new Forest Creek Apartments. 3 . To the north are single-family residences. 4 . The property to the east is currently undeveloped forested ground and is the site of a recently approved subdivision. 5. To the west on the west side of 98th Avenue S. the area is also developed with single family residences. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS A. Environmental Assessment A final Mitigated Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on October 20, 1989 with the following conditions: 1. The developer shall execute an environmental mitigation agreement to financially participate and pay a fair share of the costs associated with the construction of the S 272/277th Street Corridor project. The minimum benefit to the above development is estimated at $20, 292 based upon 15 PM peak hour trips entering and leaving the site and the capacity each of the three corridors mentioned above. The execution of this agreement will serve to mitigate traffic impacts to the above mentioned intersections and road system by committing funding for the construction of the above mentioned corridor projects which will provide additional capacity for traffic 7 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 volumes within the area of the above mentioned development. 2 . The developer shall analyze the storm drainage basin (downstream) and tributary to this development and make any improvements deemed necessary by the Public Works Department. 3 . The developer shall intercept any drainage that flows on site from adjacent properties and provide easements to the outlet across SE 248th St. and provide on-site detention and biofiltration for on-site drainage. B. Significant Natural Features 1. Topography and Vegetation The majority of the subject site is undeveloped ground except for the existing single-family residence and an accessory garage. The topography is fairly level with a gradual slope rising to high point towards the center of the parcel and then gradually declining towards the east end of the property. The parcel is landscaped in a typical residential manner at the western portion of the site and is also the location of the previously discussed trees. The remaining ground is covered in native grasses and scrub brush. C. Significant Social Features 1. Street System The lots will have access to proposed S 246th Street via 98th Avenue S. and proposed 100th Avenue SE. Ninety-Eighth Avenue S. has a public right-of-way width of 60 feet while the actual width of paving is 24 feet. The street has a narrow shoulder and no sidewalks. Traffic mitigation conditions have already been determined as part of the SEPA review process . One Hundredth Avenue SE will be improved at that portion of the street adjacent to the subject property. Street lighting and full street improvements will be required on S 246th Street. 8 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 2 . Water System An existing ten-inch water main is available in 98th Avenue S . to serve the subject property. Water service from the City of Kent will be provided to all lots. Main size shall be sufficient to provide required fire and domestic flows. Minimum main size shall be six inches. 3 . Sanitary Sewer System There is an existing eight-inch sanitary sewer main in SE 248th Street to the southwest of the site. This main ends at the intersection of SE 248th Street and 98th Avenue SE, but is available to serve the subject property. All lots will be connected to the City sanitary sewer system. On and off-site easements will be provided as necessary in order to make the required connections. 4 . Storm Water System On and off-site detailed plans of the storm drainage improvements will be required as part of the plat approval . 5 . LID' s No LIDS are on record at this time. V. MEETINGS CORRESPONDENCE AND LEGAL NOTICES A tentative plat meeting with the applicant and members of the subdivision committee was held on August 10, 1989 . All appropriate comments and concerns have been included in this report. VI . CONSULTED DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES The following departments and agencies were advised of this application: City Administrator City Attorney Director of Public Works Chief of Police Parks & Recreation Director Fire Chief Building Official City Clerk 9 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 In addition to the above, all persons owning property which lies within 300 feet of the site were notified of the application and of the December 6, 1989 public hearing. Staff comments have been incorporated in the staff report where applicable. VII. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVIEW The Planning Department has reviewed this application in relation to the Comprehensive Plan, East Hill Plan, present zoning, land use, the street system, and comments from other departments and finds that: A. The City-wide Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site as SF, Single Family Residential . B. The East Hill Comprehensive Plan Map designates the site as SF6, Single Family Residential, 4-6 units per acre. C. The site is presently zoned R1-9 . 6, Single-family Residential , 9 , 600 square feet minimum lot size. D. All lots meet or exceed the minimum lot size as specified in the development standards for the R1-9 . 6, Single-Family Residential , zoning district. E. Land use in the area is predominantly single-family residential to the of S 246th Street, with multifamily residential to the south across S 248th Street. F. The proposed subdivision will have access to proposed SE 246th Street via 98th Avenue S and improved 100th Avenue SE. VIII. CITY STAFF RECOMMENDATION Upon review of the merits of this request and the Code criteria for granting a preliminary plat, the City staff recommends approval with the following conditions: A. Prior to Recordation of Plat: 1. Comply with SEPA conditions (i. e. traffic mitigation agreement) , storm drainage analysis and on-site detention which incorporates biofiltration, etc. 10 Staff Report Canterbury Place #SU-89-4 2 . obtain City Approval of detailed engineering drawings for the following improvements and either construct and/or bond for the same: a. Storm System: Provide on-site storm water detention in accordance with City Drainage Code and provide public storm drainage facilities within all public roadways and roadway improvements required as a condition of this subdivision. b. Sanitary Sewer: Provide City gravity sanitary sewer system to service all lots. Extend sanitary sewers along 98th Avenue S . and along 100th Avenue SE to the north property line of the plat. C. Water: Construct City water main on 100th Avenue SE from the north property line of this plat to the south property line. The size thereof shall be in accordance with that specified in the City Water Comprehensive Plan. These improvements are a portion of those required for the Canterbury and Eastwood subdivisions will not be necessary if those projects proceed. Extend the City water main internal into the plat to provide domestic water service and fire flow capabilities to all lots. A minimum six-inch main is required. d. Internal Streets: Improve internal roadway system to residential access road standards (i. e. , curb and gutter, minimum five foot sidewalks, street lighting, asphalt pavement (minimum roadway width 28 feet curb to curb) , underground utilities, drainage, street signs, and related appurtenances) . Dedicate adequate right of way to accommodate 25 foot radius curb returns at intersections. e. 100th Avenue SE: Dedicate the easterly 30 feet of the subject property as right of way for 100th Avenue SE and improve the west half of the 11 Staff Report Canterbury Place 4SU-89-4 roadway to collector street standards (18 feet from centerline to curb, curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage facilities, underground utilities and related appurtenances) . f. On 98th Avenue S. , improvements shall include a half-street pavement width of 16 feet with curb and gutter, sidewalks, street lighting, storm drainage, underground utilities and related appurtenances. Widen the west half of 98th Avenue S . to 12 feet in width and partially overlay same to property feather the asphalt surfacing of the new section to the existing asphalt pavement. g. Install street identification signs with location, size and message as approved by the Building Department. B. Prior to or in conjunction with the issuance of any development permit: 1. Provide a comprehensive, accurate tree plan for each lot, showing all trees of six-inch caliper or greater. The plan should also show the trees in relationship to any proposed structure. 2 . Provide minimum fire flow of 1, 000 gallons per minute at 20 psi at approved locations. Fire hydrants shall meet the required 600 foot spacing. KENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT November 21, 1989 12 � t j 1 7' Kent City Council Meeting V VVV t` Date February 6 1990 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: FLOOD DISASTER ASSISTANCE e, REPRESENTATIVE * 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires that a representative from the City of Kent be authorized to act as agent for the purpose of obtaining federal funds for disaster relief. This person is responsible for coordination of efforts of the various city departments in the timely filing of disaster assistance paperwork. Failure to appoint a representative may result in denial of federal assistance. A resolution has been prepared by the City Attorney. -3: E� I TS: \Res�]�on;. 4 , RE NDED B - - Public S t Commi ee Sta t ` (Comnit e�, St ff amine Cofmissi n,'"etc. ) 5 BU D F A PERSO - MPACT: NO X ��------_ YES_�—.--- F AL ONNEL O Recom -er�d Recomm!v i� d 6. EX I UI $ N/A URC FUNI 7_.- ITY"'\Q0U1gCIL` ACTIORS move C�ur�ci�nr�fi�er i. —sect-finds adopt Resolution No. 1 designating Chief Angelo as City of Kent agent for the purpose of obtainin� federal funds for disaster relief. 44 t%i-f-d CO -F-G k_ DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 4C DEM 132 DESIGNATION OF.APPLICANT'.S AGENT RESOLUTION - Be it resolved by of _ (Governing Body) (Public Agency) That (Name) (Title) is hereby authorized to execute for and in behalf of a public agency established under the laws of the state of Washington. The purpose of this designation is to be the authorized representative for obtaining federal and or state emergency or disaster assistance funds. Passed and approved this day of 19— (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) CERTIFICATION duly appointed and (Name) (Tile) of do hereby certify that the above is true and correct copy (Public Agency) of - of a resolution passed and approved by the Public Agency) (Governing Body) ( y) on the _ day of 19. - Date. _ (citicial Position) (Signature) Kent City Council Meeting Date February 6, 1990 Category Bid 1. SUBJECT: SPECIAL POPULATIONS RESOURCE CENTER - KITCHEN RENOVATION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Last year's bids for the Special Populations Resource Center Kitchen Renovation project exceeded the available block grant monies. The Council has budgeted the funds necessary to complete the project. The low bidder, Mayer Construction Company, Inc. , is willing to complete the project for the amount of the bid. The Attorney's Office has determined that the bid is still valid since the Council did not reject the bids last year. '"EXH ITS: Bi&,,tabukati \4 . RECO NDED Y: Parks -Committee and Pa De art nt Staff { ommittee, taff; Examin r, Commission etc. ) 5. UXWDGETErY SCAL/P NNEL IMPACT_ NO YES I CAL P SO EL NO E: Recommended Not Recom ende i 6.i iEXP �NDI 7 UI�ED: 153 20 lu tax f r a tbta of 57 517 . 85 JSOUiRCE/OF FUN S : i$32 , 14,0 block grant $28 , 878 �1990 CiAy B dget D 61 18 ,Total i CIZ`�F�CO��L -AC'TtON. - �, 1 moveg-, CCbyndil�[ie�r)ser secon s to award the Resource Center Kitchen Renovation project to Mayer Construction Company in the amount of $53 , 208 plus tax for the base bid and alternate #2 . u n ? c < <> 4 `i P- i'V\ r_� , vie :'cs. ; V � ecl r DISCUSSION• -- ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 5A 5,V kl , b1 7 9 a C r N j 17 r m R 'O D R y UI y ,Gr. H a .. .. t7 M p �zj M 00 a O w H tP n w Q7 'pnyy� n M n H W N M r• N Z tjf G H w m N a a a M d l7 ,2 N o x 0 fA � F m n m n • n . r- • H - m ? 0w N Ht°w n Y• N S O O r N IRD 5 IdO n a n Q n o y N m 7. R � z M Y O r O X O R w � r H Berschauer/Phillips Construction Co. I71 P.O. Box 6264 ;� T o o v Olympia, WA 98502 v • DZ � Cf1 e Mayer Construction C p Construction Co. r o P.O. Box 95280 D N O y Des Moines, WA 98198 D -� N co O O O n O co O O O N OJ z O saf a Architect's Estimate n m w m u' ' p i0 7 D C OD 0 1 OD w o n Z C r yi o z LI v N� z }� 7 H Q R E P O R T S' A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE D. PLANNING COMMITTEE E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE F. PARKS COMMITTEE 4' JTL G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS i ' 6 OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MINUTES January 16, 1990 L COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Christi HouserPaul Mann ]AN' 2 ? 19�0 Steve Dowell 1�I 1 Y Ur KENT STAFF PRESENT: Ed Chow n r'ITY (Ni c�� Jim Hansen �1` Tony McCarthy Sandra Driscoll Barney Wilson Rod Frederiksen Don Olson May Miller Sue Viseth Becky Fowler Teri Mertes GUESTS PRESENT: Lyle Price, Kent News Journal APPROVAL OF VOUCHERS All claims for the period ending December 32 , 1989 in the amount of $1, 100, 511. 48 and for January 16, 1990 in the amount of $864 , 781. 43 were approved for payment. The December 32 payments were for goods and services received in December which will be charged against the 1989 Budget. UTILITY CUSTOMER CONCERN Finance Director McCarthy presented a dispute from a Utility Customer, Mrs. Nosler, who is the owner of property which includes a Beauty Shop, 2nd Hand Store and three apartments connected to the same water meter. The dispute is related to excessive water usage from June 17 to September 12 of 1989 totalling approximately $225. McCarthy explained that Mrs. Nosler couldn 't be at this meeting and would like to meet with the Committee at the next meeting. Councilmember Dowell commented that the monthly consumption was increasing steadily but during the period in dispute was very high. McCarthy commented that the City checked the meter in October 1989 and that no leak could be found. There is no documentation of what caused the high amount of water usage only speculations of possible reasons. City procedure requires documentation to allow adjustments to the account. The adjustment is 50% of the excess water usage and 100% of excess sewer usage if there is documentation of a leak repair. Councilmember Houser inquired as to what authority the Council has in this matter McCarthy responded that they can review the customer letter nd the City' s response, hear the facts and make a decision. If the Council feels an adjustment is authorized, the City can then write off an amount as they do with receivable writeoffs. The Committee recommended that this issue be addressed at the next Operations Committee Meeting when Mrs. Nosler could present her request. ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT Finance Director McCarthy requested extending the current Elevator Maintenance Contract for 6 months at the same rates with A&M Elevator Services Inc. This is similar to the Window Washing Contract that was extended last month in that it will allow the purchasing staff time to analyze vendors quotes and spread out the 13 contracts which currently all end on December 31, 1989 . The Committee recommended to Council that the current contract be extended through June 30, 1990 by a vote of 3-0 . FORFEITED REAL ESTATE City Attorney Driscoll stated to the Committee for information only that 2 pieces of property, forfeited from the drug arrests made by the City, will be foreclosed on by the banks because no payments have been received. Driscoll is recommending the City make the payments, until the properties can be sold, through a tempora it General Fund expenditure to cover associated costs to prevent foreclosure. Finance Director McCarthy told the Committee that these expenditures could be charged to the existing seized asset fund with reimbursement at a later date from the sale of property. Existing authorization exists for this payment so no council action is needed. CITY PROJECTS UPDATES Assistant City Administrator Hansen presented as information only updates on City projects as requested by the Committee and will do so on no less than a quarterly basis. He stated that on the Centennial Project the Mayor has signed most of the papers associated with closing of the property. A group is also researching parking alternatives for employees when construction begins. The Library project is still delayed due to drilling to get rid of perma-frost and contaminated soil from heating oil but the process is going efficiently. GOLF COMPLEX REORGANIZATION Finance Director McCarthy noted that with the departure of contracted Golf Pro Mickey Stray the City needs to increase staffing and/or contractual arrangements to keep the golf course operational . Many alternatives are available and were discussed. Among them are for the city to staff the facility or to establish a contract similar to the one established for Mickey Stray. Other alternatives could include any combination of city staffing and contractual arrangements. Parks Director Wilson submitted a budget adjustment proposal for a city run driving range and proshop showing estimated start up costs of around $800, 000 with increased revenues of about $550, 000 requiring a city loan of about $250, 000. In the interim though, a proposal is needed to keep the driving range open and to develop a plan for golf lessons and the opening of a proshop. With the driving range open seven days a week at over 8 hours per day, a proposal for a full time cashier, a parttime cashier and parttime cashier hours is proposed. In order to manage this staff, assist with management of the entire facility and to begin the planning for lessons and proshop operations the transfer of Robin Bartelt from the Senior Center is proposed. On another issue, in order to alleviate potential management/union issues on maintenance, the upgrade of Lee Anderson from a Maintenance Supervisor to a Maintenance Superintendent is proposed. The cost of these staffing changes is $93 , 816. Projected growth in revenue of 13% above the forecast based on 1989 actual is needed to cover this. Councilmember Dowell questioned the revenue estimates with respect to how sales tax is shown. He was also concerned with how much the city is losing in income by not providing lessons and proshop sales. The staff noted that currently golf lessons are not being given, but the golf course is registering lessons for interested people. The budget shows lesson income of $60, 000, but January, February and March are slower months and make up a smaller amount of budget than other months. Councilmember Houser was concerned as to why the city hasn't addressed this issue previously as we knew Mickey Stray was leaving over a year ago and why wasn't any of this included in the preparation of the 1990 budget. It was mentioned that a committee had been established to analyze this situation and this interim proposal was being presented as a solution until further analysis could be completed including a year end financial analysis and a review of proshop and lesson alternatives . City Administrator Chow requested getting authorization to begin the set up process to hire a contractual golf pro. Chow also stated that at the next Operations Committee meeting a list of options with cost estimates would be presented. In the interim the proposal identified in the attached memo written by interim Personnel Director Olson is recommended. Expenditures are projected to be covered with lesson income and growth in green fees. The Committee recommended to Council the interim proposal by a vote of 3-0. MEMORANDUM DATE: January 16, 1990 TO: ity Council Operations Committee FROM: Don Olson, Interim Personnel Director SUBJECT: Re-Organization Golf Complex ------------------------------------------------------------ The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the re- organization of the Parks Golf Complex. The attached reports contain the analysis and recommendation from the Internal Personnel Committee and Internal Budget Committee for the effected positions. With your approval it is recommended that the salary adjustments resulting from the re-organization be implemented effected February 1, 1990 . It is anticipated that the necessary funds to compensate for the impact of this re-organization will be generated through Golf Course revenue in 1990 . An overview of the impacted positions is shown below with a detailed analysis provided in the attached packet. New Positions: (1) Regular Full Time Cashier $23 , 434 . (1) Regular Part Time Cashier 13 , 703 . (Various) Temporary Cashiers 91789 • (1) Lead Maint. (Promotion MWII) Budgeted (1) Assistant Golf Complex Superintendent 44 , 152 . (1) Maint. Golf Complex Superintendent 39 , 878 . - (1) Golf Complex Supervisor (37 , 144 . ) (1) Contractual Pro 401000 With your approval this re-organization will be placed on the consent calendar for this evenings Council meeting. If you have any questions regarding this proposal please feel free to contact me directly at 859-3358 . cc: Ed Chow, City Administrator MINUTES FROM PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING JANUARY 16, 1990 PRESENT: Paul Mann Alana McIalwain Christi Houser Tony McCarthy Sandra Driscoll Barney Wilson Norm Angelo Lyle Price - Valley Daily News Rod Frederiksen Alana Mclalwain AMENDMENT TO POSSESSION OF MARIJUANA LAW City Attorney Driscoll indicated that at the last Legislative Session, the Legislature determined that violations of the marijuana laws must be a criminal violation and they have re- criminalized the possession of marijuana. What this does it change our local ordinance to be consistent with State Law and we are required by the Legislation to do that. Christi Houser moved to make the change as required. Paul Mann seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATING TO DANGEROUS WEAPONS City Attorney Driscoll indicated that the change in this ordinance is to correct an error that occurred when the document went through word processing. One of the weapons was listed as SLING shot, when actually it was supposed to be SLUNG shot. Mr. Mann asked what a slung shot is and Driscoll indicated that Jill Vanneman, Prosecuting Attorney, knew what it was but was out sick today so she would have to let them know after she was able to get the information. Chief Frederiksen indicated that he assumed it was something like what David slew Goliath with. Mr. Mann asked if this meant a sling shot is okay and Driscoll indicated that under the dangerous weapons ordinance, sling shot is not included. Christi Houser moved to make the change as requested. Paul Mann indicated that he had a question about Item D, anyone who shall carry with intention to conceal any pistol, what about a person who has a concealed weapons permit? Driscoll indicated that if a person has a permit to carry that, then they are not going to be in violation of this . Mr. Mann asked if the Kent Police Department issues permits for concealed weapons and Chief Frederiksen stated that they do. Mr. Mann asked if Chief Frederiksen saw any problem with this and Chief Frederiksen indicated that he didn't see any problem with it. Chief Frederiksen indicated that Leona Orr had expressed some concerns about people going to Karate tournaments and having some of the MINUTES FROM PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE -2- weapons they talked about, the numchucka sticks and throwing stars. Frederiksen stated that is very clearly states in Section B that it has to be used with intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons. Frederiksen indicated that after he explained this to Ms. Orr, he felt that she didn 't have any further concerns about that portion of the ordinance. Paul Mann seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE RELATED TO GUNS City Attorney Driscoll indicated that the gun ordinance had to be changed to comply with State Law so it was amended to do that. Mr. Mann asked if the City has an ordinance against assault rifles, assault weapons and Chief Frederiksen stated no. Mr. Mann asked if there had been any consideration of such an ordinance considering all the concerns regarding assault weapons. Chief Frederiksen indicated that they had looked at it, but that one of the problems comes in defining what an assault weapon is and there is currently national debate on it. Also, there is State consideration by the Chiefs and Sheriffs association regarding that topic area. Do you define it on the basis of clip size, or description of automatic weapons. You have to be very careful that you don't define assault weapons do as to include hunting type rifles or target weapons. They are very concerned that when one is drafted that it not be challenged and overturned once it is established. Chief Frederiksen indicated that this is being looked at with interest. Mr. Mann stated that he was glad to hear that. Christi Houser moved to amend the ordinance related to guns. Paul Mann seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. STATISTICAL UPDATE - POLICE DEPARTMENT Chief Frederiksen indicated that this item be postponed to a later date when there was a little more time. Mr. Mann asked for any additional items. Chief Angelo indicated that they would be at the next Public Safety meeting with a couple of items, to include accepting the of the Station 71 building. Christi Houser asked about the Northend Station. Chief Angelo MINUTES FROM PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING JANUARY 16, 1990 PAGE -3- indicated that they ' re almost up to the end of the year right now and they're still going. Chief Angelo indicated that he did a presentation to Rotary about the Bond Projects and where they are. Paul Mann asked about the West Hill Station going up on target date. Chief Angelo indicated that there isn't a target date on moving in yet, but it may be toward the last week of January or the first week of February. Christi Houser asked what the idea was for the dedication and Chief Angelo indicated that the Mayor had suggested possibly dedicating the facility on the North Hill to a given individual, but right now they don't have any one in particular and probably will just dedicate it to the neighborhood. Paul Mann asked about the artwork on the Headquarters Station, the stained glass windows. Chief Angelo indicated that clear glass cannot be put back in without incurring significant costs to ventilation. The smoked glass will filter some of the sunlight and therefore keep some of the heat out. There will be another meeting called this month sometime to reconsider other alternative for artwork. Meeting adjourned. d WORKS COMMITTEE Fr- PUBLIC r January 9 , 1990 UU PRESENT: JON JOHNSON GARY GILL JUDY WOODS SANDRA DRISCOLL JIM WHITE BILL WILLIAMSON DON WICKSTROM TIM HEYDON JIM HANSEN Telemetry Equipment Heydon explained the old telemetry equipment has been in storage for several years and could be of use to other water districts. He requested we surplus the equipment and advertise for bids. The Committee unanimously approved the request. Sanitary Sewer Service 42nd Avenue S . and Orillia Road Wickstrom explained this property is now in the City of Sea-Tac. The owner has requested sanitary sewer service to develop their property. Sandra Driscoll stated there are numerous issues involved, some of which are planning issues addressing the agriculture zone and environmentally sensitive zones. Other concerns are that once sewer services the area development might be encouraged which will jeopardize the current zoning. Additionally this could affect some litigation the City has concerning the ag-zone change with the Kentview properties. The City of Sea-Tac has indicated their willingness to enter into an interlocal agreement but have assured that they won't do anything until they discuss it with Kent. Wickstrom emphasize the proposed use does not correspond with what Kent would recommend. The Committee expressed approval of the Attorney' s response to the developer' s attorney. Transportation Benefit District (TBD) Resolution and Establishment of Budget Wickstrom stated that the Steering Committee of the South County TBD Committee has agreed to form a "flexible" TBD in order to be eligible for State funds from the gas tax if available. At this point, Auburn is reluctant to move to the stage whereby the voters are advised and bonds issued; however, are more receptive to the flexible TBD. The agreement allows withdrawal within 90 days before advancing to the next phase. The Committee unanimously recommended authorization for the Mayor to sign the agreement and to adopt the resolution confirming Kent' s participation and establishment of the budget of approximately $46 , 000 from the 1990 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 9 , 1990 PAGE 2 CIP for this project. Metro Contract Modification Wickstrom explained that at the last legislative session Metro was authorized to assess a development charge for sewer connection service. That was a key element to their implementing a series of changes recommended by their Water Quality Committee. One recommendation was to reduce the base of the flat rate charge from 900 cf to 750 cf. Another was Seattle would clean up its overflows of the sanitary sewer system by spending $1, 000, 000/year thereon if the suburban districts and cities would agree to a system development charge. The system development charge is $400-500 per equivalent residential connection. Metro is proposing to collect said charge on a $7/month fee over a period of years. There is also an infiltration/inflow yearly maintenance requirement. Each agency would be required to spend 2 cents/inch diameter/foot of sewer system/year for maintenance of their system. This would equate to approximately $150 , 000 year to Kent. If the agencies do not spend this amount they would have to pay said sum to Metro. Wickstrom stated the change from 900 cubic feet to 750 cubic feet for residential equivalent would mean approximately a 10% reduction to our residential customers but approximately a 15% increase to our commercial accounts. Wickstrom stated this is informational at this time but in the next few months we will be making a recommendation whether to enter into the agreement. 272nd/277th Corridor Wickstrom explained he had originally placed this on the agenda to bring the Committee up to date. However, after discussion with the City Attorney, it was determined since the Council will have to rule on any possible appeal to the EIS , we should not present any information at this time. It was mentioned that Council should not attend the public meeting on January 24 either. Johnson asked if he could ask about the timing of the project. Driscoll confirmed that would be a legitimate question. In response, Wickstrom stated we anticipate completion of the EIS in June, 1990. Because we need permits from King County and Auburn, that process could take six months to complete. King County will have to adopt the EIS and approve the alignment. After that, we can begin the design. Thus, construction could start in the construction season of 1992 . White asked if annexation would speed up the process. Wickstrom explained it would simplify the permit process. White asked if Wickstrom had developed any figures for a city-wide GO bond issue for these transportation improvements. Wickstrom stated that with PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 9 , 1990 PAGE 3 the money the City has already obligated to the 272nd/277th corridor, if we implement our LID covenants there should be ample funds to complete that project. Wickstrom stated that the upper limit of a City GO bond was probably around $10, 000, 000. Projects like the west legs of the 192nd/196th and the 224/228th corridors and the middle segment of the 192nd/196th corridor would more than fully utilize said $10 million. We would also need to implement our LID covenants for these corridors. White asked if the City could move ahead on a GO bond issue. Wickstrom stated he was hoping the TBD would fall into place which would provide much more benefit to the City. If the City proceeds with their own GO bond issue, the TBD could not be formed as we would be approaching the same voters twice. Wickstrom added that if Auburn chooses not to be included in the TBD the boundaries could be adjusted deleting the Auburn area. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 30, 1990 PRESENT: STEVE DOWELL JIM HANSEN LEONA ORR ED WHITE DON WICKSTROM RON FERNLEY GARY GILL BILL WILLIAMSON SIGNATURE POINTE EAST Wickstrom reviewed that the SEPA review of this project required a traffic study to determine how they would exit out of the development without causing further traffic congestion. A traffic plan was developed. The plan was to restrict the new apartment complex to only right in and right out. In order to go north they would have to go turn right (south) on Washington Avenue, cross the bridge and make a u-turn in the designated area and return north. This plan still allows the office complex a right in and left out by special curbing. A letter was forwarded to the property owners and tenants in the area asking for their comments on this plan. Also sent therewith were other traffic plans depicting what future traffic revisions they can expect upon additional development within the area. We received a variety of responses. We will send another letter to those originally contacted indicating that we are proceeding with the original plan as described above and offer that if they have further concerns we can place it on the Public Works Committee agenda for further discussion. Orr asked how much of the Signature Pointe complex would have access to the road. Wickstrom commented the entire complex would have and they are also designing the complex so they also exit out to 64th as well. The Hawley road access gives them a second access in case of emergency. Wickstrom stated he felt this was the best option available in terms of minimizing the impact on the existing development. Williamson stated his office received a call from Dean S . Johnson who is an attorney in the office complex on Hawley Road indicating he wanted to meet with the Committee on this item. It was noted his response indicated he preferred the original plan. Williamson noted that Mr. Johnson was concerned about the costs. Wickstrom confirmed there would be no cost to the property owners unless an LID were formed for the signal . The improvements planned in option A would be paid for by the developer. RESOLUTION - CONVEYANCE OF REAL PROPERTY THROUGH DEED OR DEDICATION Wickstrom explained that our existing resolution requires that all conveyances of real property to the city by deed or dedication must be free of all encumbrances. We have found this requirement almost impossible to comply with and it is recommended the resolution be PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 30, 1990 PAGE 2 changed such that the affected department have the discretion of accepting the deeds. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of a resolution accomplishing same. ORDINANCE - SIDE SEWER REPAIR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION IN CITY RIGHT OF WAY Wickstrom explained we are clarifying the ordinance dealing with side sewers. The practice has been that the property owner is responsible for the entire side sewer from his house to the main and there was a question when this occurred in public right of way. The ordinance is being revised to denote that the property owner is responsible for the side sewer even if it falls within public right of way. Orr asked if the property owner was allowed to hire his own contractor to do any required repairs. It was confirmed the property owner has that right. When it is in public right of way he has to hire a licensed contractor but when it is private property he can do it himself if he chooses. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance. CHARGE IN LIEU OF ASSESSMENT - 116TH AVENUE S .E. SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION Wickstrom explained this sewer main was constructed for the Fire Training Center in the vicinity of 116th Avenue S.E. and S . 248th and was funded by the G.O. Bond issue. In order to get reimbursed when properties connect in the future, we are proposing to establish a charge in lieu of assessment upon connection. Wickstrom explained the map in the packet indicated what the cost would be to each property if they connected. Wickstrom clarified for Dowell these were very good rates for sewer connection. The Committee unanimously approved establishing the charge in lieu of assessment for future connection to the sanitary sewer main. PARKING ORDINANCE - POLICE AND FIRE VEHICLES Wickstrom stated the purpose of this ordinance is to restrict parking on Gowe Street between Third and Fourth to police and fire vehicles only during construction of the Centennial Building. Jim Hansen stated this would allow quick access to these vehicles in event of an emergency and secondly, there is concern about security of the vehicles if they are parked a distance from City hall . Dowell asked if there were any residences being affected by this. Hansen replied there are no residences in the area but the greatest concern has been the public' s access to City buildings, and the merchants concerns about parking for their customers. Hansen PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE JANUARY 30, 1990 PAGE 3 stated a parking plan was distributed to all the employees indicating parking areas for them which avoids any direct competition with retail parking. So far, it has been working. Hansen commented only one business will be affected by this restriction but there is private parking available adjacent to this business. The Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the ordinance and suggested it be placed on the Council agenda under "Other Business" .