Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCity Council Meeting - Council - Agenda - 08/02/1988 - City of Kent City Council Meeting - Agenda Office of the City Clerk CITY COUNCIL MEETING August 2, 1988 Summary Agenda City of Kent Council Chambers �M Office of the City Clerk 7 :00 p.m. NOTE: Items on the Consent Calendar are either routine or have been previously discussed . Any item may be removed by a Councilmember . The Council may add and act upon other items not listed on this agenda . CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL 1. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS - Employee of the Month • 2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS 3 . CONSENT CALENDAR -- A. Minutes B. Bills C. Planning Commission Appointment D. Golf Course Complex - Personnel E. Reorganization/Corrections Administrator Position F. Green River Corridor Park Project G. Kent Commons Alterations Project H. S .R. 99 and 252nd Traffic Signal - Acceptance as Complete I . LID 325 - 76th Ave . Improvement - Acceptance as Complete J . Parkwood Apartments - Bill of Sale K. West Valley Highway Overlay Agreement L. Surplus Property M. Kent Springs Transmission Main - Condemnation N. Central Pre-Mix Street Vacation - Resolution O. 1989 Budget - Set Hearing Date 4 . OTHER BUSINESS A. Establishment of Green River Valley Transportation Benefit District B. Surplus Property S . 244th _._ C. LeBlanc Annexation Zoning Ordinance D. Van Doren' s Landing II Rezone (RZ-88-2) - Ordinance 5 . BIDS A. 116th Ave. S .E. Sanitary Sewer B. 1987 Sanitary Sewer Extension C. 1988 Asphalt Overlay 6 . REPORTS CONTINUED COMMUNICATIONS ADJOURNMENT PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Citizens wishing to address the Council will, at this time, ry hod make known the subject of interest, so all may be properly I ' heard. V A. Employee of the Month CONSENT CALENDAR 3 . City Council Action: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that Consent Calendar Items A through O be approved. Discussion Action 3A. Approval of Minutes . Approval of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of July 19 , 1988 . V /3B. Approval of Bills . '1 Approval of payment of the bills received through August 8, 1988 of after auditing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 8 : 30 a.m. on August 15 , 1988 . Approval of checks issued for vouchers : Date Check Numbers Amount 6/9-6/15 61711-61723 6/16-6/27 62030-62059 $ 167. 623 . 39 6/30 62083-62618 1, 116, 351. 99 $1, 283 , 975 . 38 6/28-6/30 62060-62082 6/30-7/12 62619-62642 $ 240, 981. 48 7/15 62646-63124 1,054 ,035 . 57 $1, 295 ,017 .05 Approval of checks issued for payroll : Date Check Numbers Amount 7/20/88 106850-107508 $ 639 , 387 . 83 Council Agenda Item No. 3 A-B Kent, Washington July 19, 1988 Regular meeting of the Kent City Council was called to order at 7: 00 p.m. by Mayor Kelleher. Present: Councilmembers Dowell, Houser, John- son, Mann and Woods , City Administrator McFall, City Attorney Driscoll, Planning Director Harris , Public Works Director Wickstrom and Finance ,.,., Director McCarthy. Also present: Fire Chief Angelo. Councilmembers White and Biteman were not in attendance. Approximately 40 people were at the meeting. CONSENT CALENDAR WOODS MOVED that Consent Calendar Items A through G be approved. Houser seconded and the motion carried. MINUTES (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3A) Approval of Minutes. APPROVAL of the minutes of the regular Council meeting of July 5, 1988. TRAFFIC CONTROL 1989 to 1994 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) . This date has been set for the public hearing on the annual update of Kent ' s Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. The City Clerk has given the proper legal notice of the public -.- hearing. The Mayor declared the hearing open. Public Works Director Wickstrom reviewed the plan consisting of the following projects : 1 . SE 240th St. ( 106th Avenue SE - 116th Ave SE) 2. West Valley Highway (SR-181 ) and S. 212th St. 3 . West Valley Highway (SR-181 ) and S. 190th St. 4 . West Valley Highway and S. 180th St. - Phase I 5. SE 277th Street (SR167 - East Valley Highway) 6 . West Valley Highway (S. 180th - S. 212th) 7. West Valley Highway ( S. 212th - S. James St. ) 8. SE 260th St. and 104th Avenue SE 9. Canyon Drive (SR-516 ) Hazel Avenue - Weiland St. 10 . SE 256th St. and 104th Avenue SE 11 . Central Ave. (SR-516 ) Willis St. - Smith St. 12. East Valley Highway (S. 180th St. - S. 192nd St. ) 13 . Military Rd - Bolger Road to SR-516 14. Crow Road By-Pass (SR-516 By-Pass ) 15. East Valley and S. 196th Street 16. Kent-Kangley (SR-516 ) and 111th Avenue SE 17. James Street and Central Avenue 18. North Central Avenue and Smith Street 19. S. 196/200th Corridor Improvement (West Leg) 20. Central Avenue and S. 259th Street 21 . SE 248th St. - 94th Avenue SE to 116th Avenue SE 22 . S. 228th Street - Military Road to Russell Road 23 . S . 272nd St. /S. 277th St. Corridor - 1 - w July 19, 1988 TRAFFIC CONTROL Ted Knapp referred to No. 22 and noted that Union Pacific Realty was interested in seeing the private sector work with the City for fund- ing such cross-valley projects. There were no further comments and WOODS MOVED that the public hearing be closed. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt Resolution 1176 accepting the 1989-1994 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan. Woods seconded. Motion carried. CITY POLICY (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3G) Public Notice Procedures. APPROVAL of Resolution 1177 establishing a procedure for notifying the public of hearings and the preliminary agenda - for City Council meetings . This is required by legislation adopted by the 1988 legislature. COUNCIL (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3C) Excused Absence. APPROVAL to excuse the absence of Councilmember Woods for the August 2 and August 16 meetings and possibly the meeting of September 6 . LIBRARY (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3E) Architectural Services - Design of Library Facility. AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a contract for architectural services covering design of the new downtown library. This agree- ment is to be jointly entered into by the City of Kent and the King County Library System with the architectural firm of the Henry Klein Partnership. FIRE DEPARTMENT (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3D) Surplus Equipment. AUTHORIZATION to declare a Mako Compressor and Cascade System surplus to the needs of the Fire Department and to sell same to Grant County Fire District No. 4 for $3, 000. East Hill Fire Station and Training Center Complex. In order to complete the East Hill Public Safety Complex in a timely manner, it needs to be done in two phases. Bids for the first phase, which is the grade and fill, were opened on July 18 at 2 : 30 p.m. Four bids were received, with the lowest bid from Scarsella Brothers in the amount of $608 , 741 . 53 including tax. HOUSER MOVED that the bid be awarded to Scarsella Brothers in the amount of $608, 741 . 53 and that the Mayor be author- ized to sign the contract. Mann seconded and the motion carried. - 2 - July 19, 1988 SURPLUS UTILITY Surplus Property - S. 244th Street. This date PROPERTY - 30 FT. has been set for the public hearing on the sale STRIP of utility property located in the vicinity of South 244th Street between Summit and 94th Ave- nues. The City Clerk has given the proper legal _. notice. The Mayor declared the hearing open. Miles Drake noted that he owned property adjoin- ing this site and asked for more information. Wickstrom explained that Allen Stoick owns pro- perty adjoining and wants to purchase this strip to allow access so he can short plat the parcel. If declared surplus, the property could be sold through the bid process. Drake noted that it was not deeded to the city as a street and that the trees on this strip served as a screen for the adjacent owners. He pointed out that he has driven over a portion of this strip for more than twenty years to get to his property. Through the bid process, this strip could be sold to someone who does not have an interest in the property, someone from Seattle for example. Allen Stoick stated that he planned duplexes for the adjacent site and needed the strip for enough access for a fire truck. He confirmed for Mann that his plan would not prevent access for Drake and that he had not as yet had a sur- vey made. He suggested that he would work with the adjacent owners as to the actual location of property lines . Doug Gwinett of 24317 94th Avenue South, stated that the parcel in question was donated in 1967 by Joe Blessing, then five feet was added by Rhinehardt to make the dona- tion 30 feet, in case the city decided to put in a street. He opined that the strip should be left as is and that selling this strip would devaluate McHugo ' s property. Wallace McHugo of 9304 S. 244th, stated that he had lived on the east side of this strip for five years , that he had been told it was part of his property and had been maintaining it. He pointed out that if the strip was sold he would lose half of his yard, and that the portion in question came within 18 inches of his patio. He stated that the property was given to the city and if it is to be sold he thought he should have first chance at acquiring it. There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed. JOHNSON MOVED that a call for bids be authorized offering the property for sale with a minimum bid being the value deter- mined by the Property Manager ' s evaluation plus administrative costs . Woods seconded. 3 - July 19, 1988 SURPLUS PROPERTY Dowell noted that .the area residents had been using this strip for twenty years and that if the property was sold through the bid process �- it was possible none of the residents would gain control . He suggeted that the matter of ownership be further explored through the Public Works Department. Johnson noted that this had f been before the Public Works Committee. It was clarified for Houser that those residents speaking tonight had not been to the committee i meeting. Houser stated that these were all neighbors and they should discuss the matter together. Driscoll clarified that the city could deed only property for which we have title, and that the city would be clear of further responsibility. Johnson ' s motion was defeated with Dowell, Houser and Mann voting against it. HOUSER THEN MOVED to refer the matter back to the Public Works Committee for further consideration. Dowell seconded and the motion carried with Johnson opposing. PARKS & RECREATION ( CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3F) IC Golf Course Revenue Bond Ordinance and Purchase Contract_ AUTHORIZATION for the Mayor to sign a bond purchase contract with Shearson Lehman and Hutton for the Golf Course Revenue Bonds-1988 as discussed with the Operations Committee at their meeting of July 15 and the adoption of Ordinance 2790 authorizing the issuance of the bonds in the amount of $5, 285, 000 with the average interest rate of 8 . 20 percent. The golf course project has been under construc- tion for a number of months, financed with loans from the City ' s general fund. Sale of the bonds j at this time repays those loans and provides additional funds for the completion of the golf course facility which is to be opened in June i. of 1989 . Arthur Anderson has reviewed the City ' s financial presentation for the new golf course and the presentation that calls for the City to pay back the debt service and the operation and maintenance of the course from the revenue bonds . i i 4 - i July 19, 1988 REZONE APPEAL Appeal - Van Doren's Landing II Rezone. This hearing was continued from July 5, 1988 and will consider an appeal of the Hearing Examiner ' s denial of Van Doren ' s Landing Rezone No. II (RZ-88-2 ) . The request is to rezone 7. 1 acres from M1 (Industrial Park) to M1 -C ( Industrial - Park, Commercial Suffix) . The property is located on the south side of South 212th Street approximately 1200 feet west of West Valley Highway. Fred Satterstrom of the Planning Department showed a view foil of the area in question, noting the relationship between the development of Green River Square and the location of Van Doren ' s Landing rezone proposal) to the C-suffix circle. Using charts, Ted Knapp of Union Pacific Realty showed that the City ' s lagoon is 400 feet away from the proposed rezone. He noted that higher employment in the area makes more services necessary, pointing out that Boeing alone has 12 , 000 employees in the area. Chris Crumbaugh stated that the issue is that this rezone proposal does not follow the City' s Com- prehensive Plan and would lead to zoning for destination oriented retail services . Laurie Johnson, representing the Green River Study Group, expressed concern about preserving the wildlife habitat at the lagoon. Satterstrom confirmed that the proposal does not fall within the 200 ft. buffer strip surrounding the lagoon. Knapp noted that Union Pacific had no intention of creating destination oriented retail services . There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed by motion. JOHNSON MOVED to disagree with the Hearing Exam- iner ' s recommendation of denial of Van Doren ' s Landing II Rezone (RZ-88-2 ) and to recommend that the rezone be approved subject to conditions: Condition #1 : That any proposed use of the land within 200 feet of the lagoon shall conform to Resolution 922 and Ordinance 2630; Condition #2 : In addition to other applicable procedures and requirements, any proposed use of the land includ- ing, but not limited to, development, clearing, grading, drainage, paving and the like shall be reviewed by the Soil Conservation Service Citi- zen ' s Advisory Board and a report of that com- mittee shall be provided to the Council who shall make the final decision. Also to be included 5 - July 19, 1988 REZONE APPEAL in the motion are any conditions from the Plan- ning or Public Works Departments. Woods seconded the motion. Satterstrom noted that since the staff had recommended denial, conditions had not been addressed. He noted though that the Planning and Engineering Departments would like time to research the original C-suffix regula- tions over the next two weeks before the ordi- nance is presented for action. JOHNSON then clarified to include that the ordinance be pre- pared to contain his recommendations for condi- tions as well as conditions recommended by staff. The motion then carried. ZONING CODE Work Program - Update of Housing Element of Com- prehensive Plan. Woods noted that this item was considered by the Planning Committee today and it was recommended that the work plan be adopted as outlined, including the addition of one full-time planner for approximately one year. Dan Stroh of the Planning Department handed out the work plan, a copy of which has been filed for the record. He described the work program tasks as Phase I: Review of Comprehensive Plan Policies and Phase II: Sub-Area Plan Map and Zoning Map Amendments. Staffing and man hour figures were given for two scenarios : "Best Case" Scenario assumes no EIS and Combined Plan/ Zoning Map Amendments hearings by Planning Com- mission only, totaling 2000 man hours. "Worst Case" Scenario assumes Valley Floar EIS and Hear- ing Examiner review of all zoning, totaling 3430 man hours . Stroh noted that the City Attorney had advised that the current zoning code does require that the zoning map amendments be heard by the Hear- ing .Examiner, but on the area wide basis for a specific project, the Council would have the prerogative to direct that the Planning Commis- sion conduct the hearings for both items. WOODS MOVED to approve the $30, 000 for the tem- porary planner and to authorize the Planning Commission to hold the hearings on both the plan map amendments and the zoning map amendments for this area wide review of the housing element and for the City Attorney to prepare the resolu- tion or ordinance giving such authorization. Johnson seconded and the motion carried. 6 - July 19, 1988 ZONING Transitional Home. Ted Strain of 833 N. Alvord noted that residents of his neighborhood opposed the sale of a residence on the corner of James and Alvord for use as a group home for former mental patients. He asked that the residents be advised of any hearings to be held concern- ing this matter. Mayor Kelleher stated that the Planning Department had made an administrative interpretation that this would be considered a group home under the zoning code, which is allowed as a conditional use. Appeals from citi- zens of the administrative interpretation would be heard by the Board of Adjustment. A condi- tional use requires a conditional use permit which involves a hearing before the Hearing Examiner. Appeals to Hearing Examiner decisions are heard before the City Council. The Mayor advised that if names are provided, the City could advise on the progress of this proposal. Strain stated that he might submit a petition against the home. Jim Hansen clarified that the Planning Department had contacted Transitional Resources For Young Adults (TRY) and thought that a Conditional Use Permit would be required. He pointed out that TRY had not yet formally approached the City on this issue. Dowell noted that Resolution 1123 , concerning the 20% reduction in density for multi-family housing, and its ' accompanying ordinance, states that the Council will do all it can to protect and preserve single family residences . Mr. Clements commended Dowell. FINANCE (CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM 3B) Approval of Bills. APPROVAL of payment of the bills received through July 25, 1988 after audit- ing by the Operations Committee at its meeting at 8: 30 a.m. on August 1 , 1988. Approval of checks issued for vouchers: Date Check Numbers Amount Approval of checks issued for payroll: Date Check Numbers Amount 7-5-88 106194 - 106B49 $619,628.70 7 - July 19, 1988 ANNEXATION ZONING LeBlanc Annexation Zoning. Public hearings were held on the zoning for the LeBlanc Annexation on May 3 and June 7, 1988. Adoption of the ordi- nance to zone the annexation was delayed to address issues of concern. Woods noted that the property owner has raised questions about the question of fairness of her voting on this issue inasmuch as she owns property contiguous to the road that parallels the LeBlanc property. She stated that although the law might not so require, she would abstain from participating on this matter to avoid even the possibility of an appearance of unfairness. She was then excused by the Mayor and left the chambers. City Attorney Driscoll noted that the owner had questioned the conditions to the zoning which required a 30 ft. right of way and the requirement for improvement to 112th Avenue S.E. , stating that these would be arbitrary and capricious and would constitute an unconstitutional taking of property without just compensation. She pointed out that in view of a recent court case, she had reviewed the record. It would appear that the 30 ft. right of way requirement certainly relates to the testimony before the Hearing Examiner, and to her findings and to the testi- mony before the Council regarding adverse impacts from traffic indicating the need for some improve- ments to the road. Relating to the second item, speaking specifically to improvements on 112th from S. 240th to S. 232nd, it would appear that there is not yet sufficient information to deter- mine precisely what improvements need to be made. The Council could require that prior to the granting of a development permit, the owner be required to improve 112th on whatever portion would be appropriate to address the impact of said development. At the Council ' s discretion an alternative to full improvement would be an agreement to participate in formation and payment of final costs their proportionate share of a Local Improvement District. The Council has a fair amount of discretion within the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan, to set the precise number of units for a precise area. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt Ordinance 2791 , estab- lishing the zoning for the LeBlanc Annexation and Mann seconded. Johnson noted that the City had testimony and findings regarding: 8 - July 19, 1988 ANNEXATION ZONING (1) the need for and desirability of tree preservation; (2) that limitation of density would make it possible to preserve as many of the unique botanical features of the site as possible; (3) the inadequacy of 112th Ave. to handle additional traffic caused by the development and the high threat to pedestrian safety; (4) concern for the safety of children walking to and from the daycare and/or the elementary school; (5) the desire for protection of the single-family residential users in the neighborhood; (6) 112th Ave. is classified as a residential collector; (7) development of the property will generate considerable traffic and the hearing examiner stated that the traffic impacts will need to be exactly determined and mitigated; (8) • it is anticipated by staff that the traffic impacts will be able to be mitigated; -. (9) East }till comprehensive plan for this area permits multi-family for 7 to 12 units per acre for a portion of the property; (10) the Public Works Department has recommended that a 30 foot right-of-way be deeded to the City for street purposes in conjunction with the development of the property in order to address traffic impacts from the development; (11) it is in the public interest to provide safe roads. He then added Condition No. 3 to the motion, as follows : - 9 - July 19, 1988 ANNEXATION ZONING That prior to the issuance of a development per- mit for a permitted use for any properties within the LeBlanc Annexation area , the owner shall improve 112th Avenue, or a portion thereof, as is appropriate, in order to fully address the impacts associated with the development. This obligation may be met by agreeing to participate in the formation of and to pay its proportionate share of the final costs of a Local Improvement District to improve 112th Avenue. It was deter- mined that this Condition No. 3 is meant to replace Condition No. 3 of the ordinance, as prepared. Upon questions , Driscoll explained that the new wording for Condition No. 3 states that prior to getting a development permit the developer will be required to make improvements to 112th that are necessary to deal with the impacts caused by the higher density resulting from the development . The commitments will be determined when the owner commences development of the property. Dowell noted that passage of the ordinance had been delayed to clarify some of the conditions and he questioned whether proper clarification had been made. He suggested that some of the language was subject to several interpretations and suggested that passage of the ordinance be delayed. DOWELL MOVED to table and Mann seconded. The motion failed with Dowell and Mann supporting and Johnson and Houser opposing. Mann noted that during the hearing, it was pointed out that there were no sidewalks for children and ques- tioned whether this matter was fully covered in the conditions. Johnson acknowledged this , and opined that the language did address this situation in that in order to develop, the developer would have to participate in improving the road. Dowell stated that if the development did not go through, it could be that the road would not be improved. Johnson stated that the City could initiate an LID for sidewalks. The motion to adopt Ordinance 2791 , with Con- dition No. 3 revised, then carried, with Mann, Johnson and Houser voting in favor and Dowell voting against. - 10 - July 19, 1988 REPORTS Planning Committee. Woods noted that the Commit- tee would meet in August be sending a PUD ordi- nance to the Council . Administrative Reports. City Administrator McFall announced that Planning Manager Jim Hansen had been selected as the new Assistant City Administrator and would assume his new duties on August 15th. Congratulations were offered by all. Mayor Kelleher introduced the new Community Information Officer, Mimi Castillo, an attorney who has worked on the King County Council staff and has been Acting Property Manager for the Federal Government Community Services for Region X. Ms . Castillo was welcomed to the City. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 8: 58 p.m. Marie Jensen, CMC City Clerk - 11 - Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 fCategory Consent Calendar VC 1. SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Confirmation of the Mayor ' s appointment of Al Haylor to replace Rusty Dunham on the Planning Commission. This term will expire December 31, 1990. 3 . EXHIBITS: LETTER FROM MAYOR 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds _ DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3C OFFICE OF THE MAYOR July 27, 1988 TO: JIM WHITE, PRESIDENT, CITCOUNCIL FROM: DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR I, SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION--APPOINTMENT I have recently appointed Mr. Al Haylor to the Planning Commission, to replace Russell E. Dunham who resigned from the Board due to a relocation. Mr. Haylor presently serves on the King County Boundary Review Board offering both experience and interest in Planning Commission matters. The term of Mr. Haylor's appointment will be 12/31/90. I submit this for your confirmation. DK:am cc: City Councilmembers Marie Jensen, City Clerk Brent McFall, City Administrator Jim Harris, Director of Planning �Jl\ Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: GOLF COURSE COMPLEX - PERSONNEL 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to immediately convert a temporary part-time clerical position to a regular part-time position with benefits for 30 hours per week. Authorization to hire an Assistant Greenskeeper and a Maintenance Worker II/Mechanic in September , 1988 . 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter from Neil Sullivan. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Parks Department City Administration, and Operations Committe - August 1. (Committee, Staff , Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ '22, 995 SOURCE OF FUNDS : Golf Course Enterprise Fund 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3D July 27, 1988 -- Please find below pertinent information as to manpower needs. PRESENT MANPOWER AT GOLF COURSE - DRIVING RANGE COMPLEX July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May June .-Norm Reger, S-Visor Lloyd Abraham Dave Dvorak Bob Melvin Pat Sims* Temp.Summer Help *Pat Sims is currently full-time Night Maintenance person at Driving Range, and does not work on Golf COurse. The 2-months Pat Sims is off, his shift has to be covered daily by other Maint. Staff. To allow Range coverage, we will have only one Maintenance worker for the 2 golf courses in Sept, Dec. and January, and only 2 for October and November. Without having the new people on-board, it will be impossible to cover the new Course. 1. Assistant Greenskeeper should be on-board in September for irrigation and moving duties. 2. Full-time moving of the new golf course to commence 1-month after seeding (Sept.) 3. Tees, greens and fairways at new golf course need year-around moving, as well as present complex. This requies a Worker/Mechanic to be on-board in September also. 4. Golf Course Secretary/Bookkeeper to become Permanent Part-Time in 1988 and full-time in 1989. The combined salaries of these 3 personnel amounts to $22,955 and will be financied out of increased unanticipated revenue. Respectfully submitted', .. c Neil J. Sullivan Golf Complex Superintendent Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: REORGANIZATION/CORRECTIONS ADMINISTRATOR POSITION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to reorganize the Police Department, adding a Police Captain to be in charge of the Corrections Facility. 3 . EXHIBITS: Attached. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff City Administrator , and Public Safety Committee on 7/25/88 . (Committee, Staff , Examiner , Commission, etc . ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: No additional expenditure required. SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3E KENT POLICE DEPARTMENT JULY 25, 1988 TO: Brent McFall, City Administrator FROM: Rod Frederiksen, Chief of Police 0q SUBJECT: Reorganization/Corrections Administrator Position Discussion: As you are aware, Corrections Administrator Bill Linville resigned on 6-17-88 . I have temporarily filled the vacancy by transferring Captain Dennis Byerly from Patrol Division to the Corrections Division to serve as Acting Corrections Administrator. Mr. Linville's resignation has allowed me time to evaluate the Administrator' s position and to consider whether a civilian administrator should be recruited or if we should fill the position from existing staff by promoting a third Police Captain. Cost: The civilian Corrections Administrator is paid the same salary in our salary structure as a Police Captain. Recommendation: I recommend that I be authorized to reorganize the Kent Police Department placing a Police Captain in charge of each of the Department's three divisions (Patrol, Support Services and Corrections) . If authorized, I will work with the Civil Service Commission and Personnel Department to develop a test for Police Captain with the goal of filling the position during the month of September. Benefits: It should be noted that both existing Captains on the Kent Police Department were actively involved in planning for the creation of the current Corrections Facility. They are both very familiar with operational philosophy of the facility and laws governing Correctional Facilities. In addition, creating another Captain's position would allow additional staff career development opportunities for my command staff. It would also ensure that the Corrections Administrator has a better overall view of Departmental operation and, in my opinion, enhance inter-departmental coordination. TO: Brent McFall, City Administrator, Continued Page -2- RE: Reorganization/Corrections Administrator Position July 27 , 1988 one last point is that this obviously will allow internal promotional opportunities which should be a positive morale builder for staff. Action- I request approval to submit this reorganizational proposal to the Public Safety Committee and full Council for consideration. /klr ly Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: GREEN RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT INCLUDING BRISCOE PARK AND TRAIL AREA, GREEN RIVER TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS (BLOCK GRANT) , AND GOLF COURSE TRAIL 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of Green River Corridor Project in the amount of $264, 754 as complete and release of retainage to Golf Landscaping upon receipt of state releases . 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter, including financial breakdown, from Barney Wilson, Director . 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and architect, Colie Hough Associates . (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $13 , 237.70 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Green River Corridor Park, Green River Trail Improvement (block grant) and golf course construction projects . 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3F PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT July 27, 1988 TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION FROM: BARNEY WILSON, DIRECTOR PREPARED BY: RAMONA VALDEZ, MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT SUBJECT: GREEN RIVER CORRIDOR PROJECT As recommended by the architect, Colie Hough Associates, the Parks Department requests acceptance of the Green River Corridor Project as complete and release of retainage to Golf Landscaping upon receipt of state releases. The Green River Corridor Project is comprised of three separate projects - Briscoe Park and Trail, Green River Trail Improvement (Block Grant) and Golf Course Trail, all which were completed in a timely manner and within budget. Following is a financial breakdown: BRISCOE PARK & TRAIL - Base Bid & Alternates 3 , 4 & 5 Contract Amount $175,467 .00 Change Orders 3 ,480. 00 Total Briscoe/Trail $178,947 . 00 GREEN RIVER TRAIL IMPROVEMENT (BLOCK GRANT) - Alternate 1 Contract $ 48,890. 00 Change Orders -0- Total Gr. Riv. Trail 48, 890. 00* GOLF COURSE TRAIL - Alternate 2 Contract $ 35, 868 . 00 Change Orders 1, 049 . 00 Total Golf C. Trail $ 36,917.00 _. GRAND TOTAL $264, 754 .00 *Project revenue includes $35,000 in Block Grant funds. (�tn- 4/ Kent City Council Meeting ' oo Date August 2 1988 1 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT COMMONS ALTERATIONS PROJECT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of Kent Commons alterations project in the amount of $29.092 . 10 as complete and release of retainage to Howard Bowker, Inc . upon receipt of state releases. 3 . EXHIBITS: Letter , including financial breakdown, from Barney Wilson, Director . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff and architect, Ted Bower . (Committee, Staff, Examiner , Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $2, 694 .56 SOURCE OF FUNDS: Recreation/Kent Commons General Fund budget (unexpended balance generated from department reorganization) . 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 3G PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT July 27, 1988 TO: MAYOR KELLEHER, CITY COUNCIL AND ADMINISTRATION FROM: BARNEY WILSON, DIRECTOR PREPARED BY: RAMONA VALDEZ, MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT SUBJECT: KENT COMMONS ALTERATIONS PROJECT As recommended by the architect, Ted Bower, the Parks Department requests acceptance of the Kent Commons Alterations Project as complete and release of retainage to Howard Bowker, Inc. , upon receipt of state releases. The project was completed in a timely manner and within budget. Following is a financial breakdown of the project: Contract $18,488.60 Change Orders 8,457.00 Sales Tax 2, 146.50 Total $29, 092 . 10 V Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar -- / 1. SUBJECT: S.R. 99 and 252ND TRAFFIC SIGNAL 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept as complete the contract with Totem Electric for the installation of a traffic signal at S.R. 99 and 252nd and release of retainage after receipt of the required releases from the state. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from the Director of Public Works . 4. RECOMMENDED BY, (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS : 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves , Councilmember seconds _... DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3H DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 28, 1988 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstromti� RE: SR 99 and 252nd Traffic Signal The project consisted of the installation of a traffic signal with vehicle and pedestrian signal heads and detectors as well as permanent signing and channelization. The contract was awarded .. to Totem Electric for the bid amount of $96, 821 on May 5, 1987 . Because of delays in procurement of equipment, notice to proceed was not given until September 21. A further delay was experienced the end of October and work was not commenced until January 25, 1988. A budget of $120 , 609 was established for this project. Construction costs are $95, 860.85 with project costs paid to date of $107,896.79. It is recommended this project be accepted as complete and the retainage released after receipt of the State releases. A"A Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: LID 325 - 76TH AVE. IMPROVEMENTS 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Accept as complete the contract with Gary Merlino Construction and release of retainage after receipt of the required releases from the state. 3 . EXHIBITS: Memorandum from the Director of Public Works. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff , Examiner , Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves , Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3I DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 28, 1988 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom1��V RE: L.I.D. 325 - 76th Avenue Street Improvements The project connected 76th Avenue South from S. 212th to S. 220th with street and storm improvements, curb, gutter, sidewalks, illumination and landscaping. The contract was awarded to Gary Merlino Construction on September 1, 1987 for the bid amount of $617, 186. 16. There were three change orders required for adjustment of utilities and soils work with final construction costs being $695, 503 . 81. The project budget was $1, 086,781 with $771, 381 being assessed to the property owners via the L.I.D. Project costs paid to date are $902,712 . 47. It is recommended the project be accepted as complete and retainage released after receipt of the releases from the State. Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: PARKWOOD APARTMENTS - BILL OF SALE 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Acceptance of the bill of sale and warranty agreement for continuous operation and maintenance of approximately 1, 146 feet of water main extension and 812 feet of sanitary sewer extension constructed in the vicinity of 104th Ave. S.E. and S.E. 264th St. for the Parkwood Apartment complex and release of cash bond after expiration of the one year maintenance period. 3 . EXHIBITS: Vicinity map. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: Staff (Committee, Staff, Examiner , Commission, etc. ) 5. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3J 1'a � f' � � w � .I� �1(a�il� _wear .__v•__ 1 Y.I A h � 1 :� -I ^ �.'7 • -f ``�" ; :+t��,�_•';� �f '�.� r•• .•". la atl.v tr r�l �� , + • � • ,' �• I nryuh Nh1j�~��\� •`r �It�1 i i` .Iwf � ! v' � n .M I _I. �' J � .� �.•V!TI l .T ll�� 41 M� • � t �r i MtuP.v.; 1! U)�h 1/ 1 'I ' i .•^ S I 11 • I r ,n ••I S n �,� I / _�a a I 1 { {I R 1 i � I J a �1�`a •.f ..vl VICINITY IWAP PARKWOOD APARTMENTS U Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: WEST VALLEY HIGHWAY OVERLAY - S. 189TH STREET TO S. 180TH STREET 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the Mayor to sign agreement with the State for the State ' s financial participation in the overlay project. 3 . EXHIBITS: Excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes . ,. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Staff, Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff , Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3K Public Works Committee July 26, 1988 Page 3 Rent Springs Transmission Main Wickstrom denoted the properties in question for the Committee. McCaughan stated that negotiations on those parcels have been unsuccessful. Wickstrom added that we have even changed the proposed alignment of the main in order to accommodate some of the requests and even still we have not been able to reach an agreement. Wickstrom requested that staff be authorized to proceed with condemnation procedures so the project can move along and emphasized that negotiations would continue at the same time. The Committee unanimously approved the request. West Valley Highway Overlay The State will contribute approximately $130,000 for the overlay of West Valley Highway from S. 189th to S. 180th. The agreement has not been received to date but Wickstrom requested authorization to sign the agreement after its receipt and review by the legal department. The project has to be completed this year in order to secure the funds. The Committee authorized approval for the Mayor to sign the agreement. Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 P/ Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: UPPER MILL CREEK DETENTION BASIN - SURPLUS PROPERTY 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization to declare as surplus a house in the vicinity of 106th Ave. S.E. and offer same for sale at fair market value and authorization for the City Attorney to -° prepare a resolution setting a public hearing date of September 6 . 3 . EXHIBITS: vicinity map and excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION• ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3L Public Works Committee July 26, 1988 Page 2 owners can work among themselves to resolve the problem. That would clear any hurdles as far as the City were concerned. If we delay any decision further it delays Mr. Stoick' s project. Dowell moved for the City to release any interest in the property. After further explanation of this procedure, Johnson stated he still would rather have the property surplused. It was determined that the Committee will report back to the Council that no action was taken at Committee level to resolve the issue. The two options will be presented to the Council at that time. Dowell and Johnson encouraged the property owners to get together before the Council meeting at August 2 and try to reach an agreement on use. Proposed L.I.D. - S. 208th Street Improvement Wickstrom explained we have received responses back from our second letter to the property owners regarding this proposed L. I.D. While we have enough covenants to form the L. I.D. there are several property owners who do not support the project. This is a local access street and the improvement is not critical; however, there is a need for extensive maintenance work. Thus, before doing the maintenance we pursued the possibility of forming an L.I.D. for full street improvements. After some discussion, it was determined not to pursue the L. I. D. at this time and to proceed with the needed maintenance. King County Motion Re Green River Valley Transportation Benefit District The Committee unanimously recommended approval of the King County motion and to place it under "Other Business" on the Council agenda. Upper Mill Creek Detention Project Wickstrom stated the house is located on property we have purchased for expansion of the Upper Mill Creek Detention facility. We will either have to demolish the house or declare it as surplus, offer it for sale and have the buyer move the house. Wickstrom stated he is recommending the house be surplused and offered for sale. The Committee unanimously approved the recommendation. L \ _ 0.0I p Blue BerriesIL - a LL QU t{ F 0 0 `a t I, AL y (I,I jJ� \ .\\• �. 200l L 33 �\ \1\\ �V ��\ ill • \ � � O r•..ry UPPER MILL CREEK DETENTION Uv Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: KENT SPRINGS TRANSMISSION MAIN 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Authorization for the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance to proceed with condemnation of properties for which negotiations have been unsuccessful . 3 . EXHIBITS: Map and excerpt from Public Works Committee minutes . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee (Committee, Staff , Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3M Public Works Committee July 26, 1988 Page 3 Rent Springs Transmission Main Wickstrom denoted the properties in question for the Committee. McCaughan stated that negotiations on those parcels have been unsuccessful. Wickstrom added that we have even changed the proposed alignment of the main in order to accommodate some of the requests and even still we have not been able to reach an agreement. Wickstrom requested that staff be authorized to proceed with condemnation procedures so the project can move along and emphasized that negotiations would continue at the same time. The Committee unanimously approved the request. West Valley Highway Overlay The State will contribute approximately $130, 000 for the overlay of West Valley Highway from S. 189th to S. 180th. The agreement has not been received to date but Wickstrom requested authorization to sign the agreement after its receipt and review by the legal department. The project has to be completed this year in order to secure the funds. The Committee authorized approval for the Mayor to sign the agreement. SF 274 x SE _ 275TH .ST ; W �� V �* F ,0 S'f�' 5c I75TH AV tr E 1 > > to - -- SE " 276THST -- o W, N --- -- x x . SE ¢ N > SE 27GTH PL S -•••,.•••, SE 276TH v A � i4 v� C �' 1 .. '� V a PfN TREEir;.1: :: SE 27TTH s Q ARK r.:i :':1r: ;::: w f� ,•,,, •,,•;,,,� PL P kn SEITTTH ZSE2=HPL CL ti SE 230TH ST SE .280TH ST UJ 33 i 2 ,p St SE 281 T ST SE 282ND • ST SE 782ND ST ® N SE 2R4TH ST j SE 2841 a > SE 286 Lu iT SE 288THV ST SE 288TH PL .ST r � AO ST SE 292ND ST S y y 4 NO SCALE LU '4 w V. ; v' n -- w LEGEND > SE 2987H ST CONDEMNATION yjH PARCELS x JF IAJ IMPOUNDMENT Cr RESEVOIR A4 ; > N E w y Q = WATER MAIN ROUTE tr) I( _j a '~ ' Sr. 302ND S F- aD SE - 304TH ST KENT SPRINGS TRANSMISSION MAIN rfH PL ::LEA ., _.. - - - - PARK::, Q : =I N a SE 310TH ST - N ,o SE ' SE 312TH ST Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 l� Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: CENTRAL PRE-MIX STREET VACATION - RESOLUTTION 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Adoption of Resolution setting the hearing date for Septet^her 6 , 1988 on the -Central Pre-Mix application for a street vacation 3 . EXHIBITS: Resolution. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff , Examiner , Commission, etc . ) 5. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ _.. SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 3N Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Consent Calendar 1. SUBJECT: 1989 BUDGET - PRELIMINARY HEARING 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: A public hearing date of August 16. 1988 has been established to receive preliminary input from the public for the 1989 City budget . 3 . EXHIBITS: 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No . 30 ............ Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2 , 1988 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GREEN RIVER VALLEY TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: King County is proposing to introduce a motion before their Council to establish the Green River Valley Transportation Benefit District (GRVTBD) within the general boundaries of the Green River Valley Action Plan and to designate King County as a coordinating agency. The Public Works Committee has reviewed the motion and is recommending support of same. 3 . EXHIBITS: Copy of the motion and an excerpt from the Public Works Committee minutes . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: Public Works Committee _.. (Committee, Staff , Examiner , Commission, etc . ) 5. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember _x_ ' .seconds that Kent City Council support the King County motion to establish the Green River Valley Transportation Benefit District and that King County be designated as the coordinating agency. DISCUSSION• ACTION - -- _. Council Agenda Item No. 4A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 29, 1988 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council I FROM: Don Wickstrom0���IV RE: King County Motion to Establish Green River Valley Transportation Benefit District It has long been realized that a Transportation Benefit District (TBD) is one element necessary to finance the transportation needs identified in the Green River Valley Transportation Action Plan. As such, the cooperation and coordination of all the governing jurisdictions working in a joint and common effort is needed. The Valley Transportation Committee, of which Kent is an active member, is recommending to its members they support the proposed King County motion, a copy of which is attached. While passage of this proposed motion does not establish a TBD, it does put us one step closer to that goal. Public Works Committee July 26, 1988 Page 2 owners can work among themselves to resolve the problem. That would clear any hurdles as far as the City were concerned. If we delay any decision further it delays Mr. Stoick's project. Dowell moved for the City to release any interest in the property. After further explanation of this procedure, Johnson stated he still would rather have the property surplused. It was determined that the Committee will report back to the Council that no action was taken at Committee level to resolve the issue. The two options will be presented to the Council at that time. Dowell and Johnson encouraged the property owners to get together before the Council meeting at August 2 and try to reach an agreement on use. Proposed L.I.D. - S. 208th Street Improvement Wickstrom explained we have received responses back from our second letter to the property owners regarding this proposed L.I.D. While we have enough covenants to form the L. I.D. there are several property owners who do not support the project. This is a local access street and the improvement is not critical; however, there is a need for extensive maintenance work. Thus, before doing the maintenance we pursued the possibility of forming an L. I.D. for full street improvements. After some discussion, it was determined not to pursue the L. I.D. at this time and to proceed with the needed maintenance. King County Motion Re Green River Valley Transportation Benefit District The Committee unanimously recommended approval of the King County motion and to place it under "Other Business" on the Council agenda. Upper Mill Creek Detention Project - Wickstrom stated the house is located on property we have purchased for expansion of the Upper Mill Creek Detention facility. We will either have to demolish the house or declare it as surplus, offer it for sale and have the buyer move the house. Wickstrom stated he is recommending the house be surplused and offered for sale. The Committee unanimously approved the recommendation. June 9, 1988 DRAFT INTRODUCED BY PROPOSED NO.: MOTION NO. l 2 A MOTION designating King County as coordinating agency to establish a Green River Valley Transportation Benefit 3 District (GRVTBD) within the general boundaries of the _. 4 Green River Valley Action Plan. 5 WHEREAS, significant increases in population and employment in King County 6 are occurring and are expected to continue to occur in the future, and 7 WHEREAS, such increases have been quantified in the Puget Sound Council of .8 Government's Year 2000 Population and Employment Forecast, and 9 WHEREAS, the existing transportation system is already congested, and in 10 need of expansion, and is not capable of supporting the proposed traffic to be 11 generated by the growing population and cortmercial development without signifi- 12 cant improvements, and 13 WHEREAS, a summary of the identified needs and costs for projects to the 14 unincorporated area of south King County as outlined in the Green River Valley 15 Transportation Action Plan (GRVTAP), and the Plan, and 16 WHEREAS, King County Council Motion 6983 directed the Executive and Council 17 staff to work with agencies, ,jurisdictions and the private sector to discuss and evaluate the development of a system of transportation benefit districts in 18 19 south King County, and 20 WHEREAS the City of through Resolution confirmed GRVTAP needs and committed to a ,joint implementation process, and 21 22 WHEREAS, the Valley Transportation Committee (VTC), composed of Puget Sound Council of Governments, Metro, Washington State Department of Transportation, 23 24 King County, Auburn, Tukwila, Renton, and Kent has been working with the 25 Valley Area Transportation Alliance (VATA) to define the parameters required 26 to form a Transportation Benefit District, in the Green River Valley, and 27 WHEREAS, a preliminary boundary and list of projects have been proposed 28 in the GRVTAP, and 29 WHEREAS, potential options for financing the necessary improvements are - 30 being explored, and WHEREAS, the VTC has determined that creation of a Green River Valley 31 32 Transportation Benefit District (GRVTBD) should proceed, and 33 _1_ June 9, 1989 1 WHEREAS, accomplishment of the formation of a GRVTBD will require coor- 2 dination of staff resources and funding as necessary and appropriate among the 3 agencies, jurisdictions, and private organizations, 4 NOW THEREFORE BE IT MOVED by the 5 1. King County shall be designated as coordinating agency to establish a 6 Green River Valley TBD (GRVTBD) within the general boundaries of the 7 GRVTAP. 8 2. A steering committee for the GRVTAP shall be formed consisting of a 9 representative from each of the following organizations: Auburn, Kent, 10 King County, Renton, Tukwila, METRO, Puget Sound Council of Governments, 11 the Valley Area Transportation Alliance (VATA) and the Washington State 12 Department of Transportation (WSOOT). The steering committee shall develop 13 preliminary recommendations and provide policy guidance to each of the par- 14 ticipating organizations. 15 PASSED this day of 19_ KING COUNTY COUNCIL 16 KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON 17 18 hairman 19 TTEST: 20 21 22 Clerk of the ounc 1 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 N' Kent City Council Meeting - •- p, Date August 2, 1988 Category Other Business IV 1. SUBJECT: SURPLUS PROPERTY S . 244TH 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: This matter was referred to the Public Works Committee who reviewed it at their meeting on July 26. The committee members weighed the options presented by the City Attorney' s office and concluded the matter should be brought back to the Council for action. In the meantime the property owners were to attempt to reach an amicable agreement as to the use of the property. 3 . EXHIBITS: Excerpt from the Public Works Committee minutes and a vicinity map. 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff , Examiner, Commission, etc. ) -.- 5. EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the property be declared as surplus and offered for sale to highest bidder for the value of the property as determined by the property manager, plus administrative costs . -or- Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the City Attorney' s office be directed to file a disclaimer of interest in the property. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4B PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE July 26, 1988 PRESENT: Jon Johnson Will McHugo Steve Dowell Doug Gwinnett Don Wickstrom Miles Drake Bill Williamson Alan Stoick Jerry McCaughan Surplus Property - S. 244th Wickstrom explained the City does not have clear title to the property. The property owner to the north wants to short plat his property and wants to use this parcel for access. The City can't grant access if there is questionable title. In order for him to gain access, we would have to declare the property surplus and offer it for sale to the highest bidder. Whoever buys it buys what rights the City has. The new owner would then resolve the issue. Wickstrom clarified the City has no need for the property. Bill Williamson outlined the options available. one option, of course, would be to surplus the property and offer it for sale. Another option would be for the City to disclaim any interest in the property whereby the property would revert back to the original grantor or those who have rights by virtue of adverse - possession. The abutting property owners could then come to an amicable agreement with the original grantor for use of the property or perhaps pursue adverse possession. Miles Drake stated this was not deeded as a street and asked if adverse possession could be filed against City property. Williamson responded it was the legal department's position that city property not could be taken by adverse possession. Stoick stated that two different title companies recognize the property as being transferred to the City and the County records indicate it is for right of way under City ownership. Williamson stated that if the City transferred title it would be by Quit Claim Deed rather that Statutory Warranty Deed. Dowell asked if in either option if it could be interpreted as "giving a gift" . Williamson responded it would not. Williamson added that another option would be for the neighbors to reach an agreement with Mr. Stoick regarding access to his property prior to any decision by the Council. Stoick stated he was more than willing to work with all the adjoining property owners. Dowell stated he would rather have the property owners reach an agreement than the City offering the property for sale. Johnson suggested the City surplus the property and the property Public Works Committee July 26, 1988 Page 2 owners can work among themselves to resolve the problem. That would clear any hurdles as far as the City were concerned. If we delay any decision further it delays Mr. Stoick's project. Dowell moved for the City to release any interest in the property. After further explanation of this procedure, Johnson stated he still would rather have the property surplused. It was determined that the Committee will report back to the Council that no action was taken at Committee level to resolve the issue. The two options will be presented to the Council at that time. Dowell and Johnson encouraged the property owners to get together before the Council meeting at August 2 and try to reach an agreement on use. Proposed L.I.D. - S. 208th Street Improvement Wickstrom explained we have received responses back from our second letter to the property owners regarding this proposed L. I.D. While we have enough covenants to form the L. I.D. there are several property owners who do not support the project. This is a local access street and the improvement is not critical; however, there is a need for extensive maintenance work. Thus, before doing the maintenance we pursued the possibility ' of forming an L.I.D. for full street improvements. After some discussion, it was determined not to pursue the L. I.D. at this time and to proceed with the needed maintenance. King county Motion Re Green River Valley Transportation Benefit District The Committee unanimously recommended approval of the King County motion and to place it under "Other Business" on the Council agenda. Upper Mill Creek Detention Project Wickstrom stated the house is located on property we have purchased for expansion of the Upper Mill Creek Detention facility. We will either have to demolish the house or declare it as surplus, offer it for sale and have the buyer move the house. Wickstrom stated he is recommending the house be surplused and offered for sale. The Committee unanimously approved the recommendation. "J 7.41 lid "Co wo J4,PO%. r Z6 Fog) '110f a 6'?160 0 opp X'f .30 4, ITr (. Opp 1.11 AL N At C) a .0 1 a I A, N 4 tat P 1 lip go L LnI or 4F N I GO r 643 SO 3.,"2- —7- 98-36 L D� ? 4 0 �I ck 13 Q gj ' 0 > PO G%) U SCALE J nor 47 KC 78020 7 15) HM '4 a r Ips I.Im+rs So. 2H4TH ST. 260 4j 01 yy r)u SURPLUS PROPERTY v 77� SURPLUS PROPERTY S. 244TH Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 _ " \n Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: LEBLANC ANNEXATION - ZONING ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: State law requires a majority of the full Council to adopt an ordinance. The vote on the ordinance for zoning of the LeBlanc Annexation was 3 to 1. Therefore, this was not sufficient to be approved by the Council. The ordinance is again presented to the Council for its consideration, incorporating the proposed changes to condition No. 3 as set out by the Council . 3 . EXHIBITS: Ordinance, minutes, and memo from City Attorney. 4. RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff , Examiner , Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds to adopt Ordinance establishing the zoning for the LeBlanc Annexation. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 4C OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY DATE: July 28, 1988 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Sandra Driscoll , City Attorney SUBJECT: LEBLANC ZONING ORDINANCE At its last meeting, the Council voted to establish the zoning of the LeBlanc Annexation area, attaching three conditions. This was by a vote of 3 to 1 with Judy Woods not participating in the deliberations in order to avoid even the possibility of an inference of an appearance of unfairness. This vote was not a sufficient number of Councilmembers to adopt an ordinance. Therefore, this matter is again presented to the Council on the basis of all records before it in prior meetings. The ordinance as presented reflects the new language in Condition No. 3 as proposed by the Council at its last meeting. A copy of the minutes from the last meeting summarizing that discussion is enclosed. It is necessary to have a majority of the full Council to adopt an ordinance. Therefore, passage of the ordinance must occur with a minimum of four (4) votes. 4156L-9L July 19, 1988 ANNEXATION ZONING LeBlanc Annexation Zoning. Public hearings were held on the zoning for the LeBlanc Annexation on May 3 and June 7, 1988. Adoption of the ordi- nance to zone the annexation was delayed to address issues of concern. Woods noted that the property owner has raised questions about the question of fairness of her voting on this issue inasmuch as she owns property contiguous to the road that parallels the LeBlanc property. She stated that although the law might not so require, she would abstain from participating on this matter to avoid even the possibility of an appearance of unfairness. She was then excused by the Mayor and left the chambers . City Attorney Driscoll noted that the owner had questioned the conditions to the zoning which required a 30 ft. right of way and the requirement for improvement to 112th Avenue S.E. , stating that these would be arbitrary and capricious and would constitute an unconstitutional taking of property without just compensation. She pointed out that in view of a recent court case, she had reviewed the record. It would appear that the 30 ft. right of way requirement certainly relates to the testimony before the Hearing Examiner, and to her findings and to the testi- mony before the Council regarding adverse impacts from traffic indicating the need for some improve- ments to the road. Relating to the second item, speaking specifically to improvements on 112th from S. 240th to S. 232nd, it would appear that there is not yet sufficient information to deter- mine precisely what improvements need to be made. The Council could require that prior to the granting of a development permit, the owner be required to improve 112th on whatever portion would be appropriate to address the impact of said development. At the Council ' s discretion an alternative to full improvement would be an agreement to participate in formation and payment of final costs their proportionate share of a Local Improvement District. The Council has a fair amount of discretion within the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan, to set the precise number of units for a precise area. JOHNSON MOVED to adopt Ordinance 2791 , estab- lishing the zoning for the LeBlanc Annexation and Mann seconded. Johnson noted that the City had testimony and findings regarding: - 8 - July 19, 1988 ANNEXATION ZONING (1) the need for and desirability of tree preservation; (2) that limitation of density would make it possible to preserve as many of the unique botanical features of the site as possible; (3) the inadequacy of 112th Ave. to handle additional traffic caused by the development and the high threat to pedestrian safety; (4) concern for the safety of children walking to and from the daycare and/or the elementary school; (5) the desire for protection of the single-family residential users in the neighborhood; (6) 112th Ave. is classified as a residential collector; (7) development of the property will generate considerable traffic and the hearing examiner stated that the traffic impacts will need to be exactly determined and mitigated; (8) ' it is anticipated by staff that the traffic impacts will be able to be mitigated; (9) East hill comprehensive plan for this area permits multi-family for 7 to 12 units per acre for a portion of the property; (10) the Public Works Department has recommended that a 30 foot right-of-way be deeded to the city for street purposes in conjunction with the development of the property in order to _ address traffic impacts from the development; (11) it is in the public interest to provide safe roads. He then added Condition No. 3 to the motion, as follows: n 9 _ Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Other Business 1. SUBJECT: VAN DOREN' S LANDING II REZONE (RZ-88-2) - ORDINANCE 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: On July 5 and July 19 the Council conducted a public hearing to consider the appeal of Union Pacific Realty to the Hearing Examiner ' s recommendation to deny this rezone. The Council approved the rezone, subject to the conditions listed in the July 19 minutes and subject also to conditions which may be recommended by the Planning Department and/or the Public Works Department. 3 . EXHIBITS: Minutes of the July 19 Council meeting, Planning Department conditions, ordinance . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: City Council - JulY 19 1988 (Committee, Staff , Examiner, Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember LI {X.- seconds r to adopt Ordi ance 9 approving the Van Doren' s Landing II rezone to MI-C including the conditions . DISCUSSION: ACTION: L�Ll' tul Council Agenda Item No . 4D July 19, 1988 REZONE APPEAL Appeal - Van Doren's Landing II Rezone. This hearing was continued from July 5, 1988 and will consider an appeal of the Hearing Examiner ' s denial of Van Doren ' s Landing Rezone No. II (RZ-88-2 ) . The request is to rezone 7. 1 acres from M1 ( Industrial Park) to M1 -C ( Industrial Park, Commercial Suffix) . The property is located on the south side of South 212th Street approximately 1200 feet west of West Valley Highway. Fred Satterstrom of the Planning Department showed a view foil of the area in question, noting the relationship between the development of Green River Square and the location of Van Doren ' s Landing rezone proposal) to the C-suffix circle. Using charts, Ted Knapp of Union Pacific Realty showed that the City ' s lagoon is 400 feet away from the proposed rezone. He noted that higher employment in the area makes more services necessary, pointing out that Boeing alone has 12 , 000 employees in the area. Chris Crumbaugh stated that the issue is that this rezone proposal does not follow the City ' s Com- prehensive Plan and would lead to zoning for destination oriented retail services . Laurie •- •- Johnson, representing the Green River Study Group, expressed concern about preserving the wildlife habitat at the lagoon. Satterstrom confirmed that the proposal does not fall within the 200 ft. buffer strip surrounding the lagoon. Knapp noted that Union Pacific had no intention of creating destination oriented retail services . There were no further comments and the public hearing was closed by motion. JOHNSON MOVED to disagree with the Hearing Exam- iner ' s recommendation of denial of Van Doren' s Landing II Rezone (RZ-88-2 ) and to recommend that the rezone be approved subject to conditions: Condition #1 : That any proposed use of the land within 200 feet of the lagoon shall conform to Resolution 922 and Ordinance 2630; Condition #2: In addition to other applicable procedures and requirements, any proposed use of the land includ- ing, but not limited to, development, clearing, grading, drainage, paving and the like shall be reviewed by the Soil Conservation Service Citi- zen ' s Advisory Board and a report of that com- mittee shall be provided to the Council who shall make the final decision. Also to be included - 5 - July 19, 1988 REZONE APPEAL in the motion are any conditions from the Plan- ning or Public Works Departments. Woods seconded the motion. Satterstrom noted that since the staff had recommended denial, conditions had not been addressed. He noted though that the Planning and Engineering Departments would like time to research the original C-suffix regula- tions over the next two weeks before the ordi- nance is presented for action. JOHNSON then clarified to include that the ordinance be pre- pared to contain his recommendations for condi- tions as well as conditions recommended by staff. The motion then carried. ZONING CODE Work Program - Update of Housing Element of Com- prehensive Plan. Woods noted that this i t e� as considered by the Planning Committee day a d it was recommended that the work pla be ad ted as outlined, including the addi ion of one ull-time planner for approximate) one year. Dan S roh of the Planning Department anded out the wo plan, a copy of which has een filed for the ecord. He described the ork program tasks as hase I: Review of Comp ehensive Plan Policies a d Phase II: Sub-Are Plan Map and Zoning Map endments. Staffi g and man hour figures were iven for two sc narios : Best Case" Scenario assumes no E and Combined Plan/ r in Zoning Map Amen ments heags by Planning Com- mission only, to ling 20 0 man hours . "Worst Case" Scenario as mes U lley Floor EIS and Hear- ing Examiner review of all zoning, totaling 3430 man hours . Stroh noted that t e Ci y Attorney had advised that the current oning ode does require that the zoning map a endments e heard by the Hear- ing Examiner, b t on the a a wide basis for a specific proje t, the Counci would have the prerogative t direct that th Planning Commis- sion conduct the hearings for th items . WOODS MOV to approve the $30, 00 for the tem- porary p anner and to authorize the Planning Commiss on to hold the hearings on b th the plan map a endments and the zoning map ame ments for his area wide review of the housin element an for the City Attorney to prepare the esolu- t 'on or ordinance giving such authorizatio . Johnson seconded and the motion carried. 6 _ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE of the City of Kent, Washington, relating to land use and zoning, providing for the rezoning of property located on the south side of South 212th Street, approximately 1,200 feet west of West Valley Highway consisting of 7.1 acres in King County, Washington from M1, Industrial Park, to Ml-C, Industrial Park - Commercial Suffix. WHEREAS, on May 4, 1988, the Hearing Examiner held a public hearing to consider the rezone of the area described in attached Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the applicant requested that the property be rezoned from M1, Industrial Park, to MI-C, Industrial Park - Commercial Suffix; and WHEREAS, the Hearing Examiner recommended denial of the application in her Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations for the Van Doren's Landing II Rezone; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on this matter on July 5, 1988 and July 19, 1988, at which time the Kent City Council considered the Hearing Examiner's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations and additional public and staff input; and WHEREAS, in her conclusions, the Hearing Examiner determines that the rezone is compatible with development in the vicinity or anticipated in the vicinity; that traffic mitigation imposed through the SEPA process would adequately mitigate the impacts; that circumstances have changed to warrant the rezone; that the rezone would not adversely affect the health, safety, andl welfare of the citizens of Kent; and that the evidence does not establish that approval of this rezone would result in strip commercial zoning; and i WHEREAS, however, the Hearing Examiner concluded that it was not within her parameters to make the policy decision to determine whether the "C" suffix zoning should be extended from major intersections, but, rather, such is a policy decision for the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Comprehensive Plan is a guide and the proposed rezone is consistent with the policy of the City for the "C" suffix zoning to address the need for limited commercial uses on the valley floor; and WHEREAS, the proposed use is not inconsistent with the land uses in the vicinity; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENT, WASHINGTON DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Hearing Examiner as set forth in the Van Doren's Landing II Findings and Recommendations of the Hearing Examiner for the City of Kent, which is on file with the Kent City Clerk, are hereby adopted and concurred with to the extent consistent with this ordinance and with the conditions set forth more fully below. Section 2. The zoning for this site located generally on, the south side of South 212th Street, approximately 1,200 feet west of West Valley Highway and consisting of approximately 7.1 acres and as more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby changed from Ml, Industrial Park, to MI-C, Industrial Park - Commercial Suffix. Section 3. The rezone is subject to the following conditions: A. Any proposed use of the land within 200 feet of the Kent City lagoon shall conform to Resolution 922. 2 - B. In addition to other applicable procedures and requirements, any proposed use of the land, including but not limited to development, clearing and grading, and paving shall be reviewed by the Soil Conservation Service Citizens Advisory Board of the City of Kent. The report of the Board shall be provided to the City Council, which shall make any final decisions related thereto. C. The proposed development shall be in general conformity with the site plan as presented with this rezone application. While minor modifications to this site plan shall be permitted, the use shall be tied to a hotel and/or restaurant. Any change in use shall be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner and additional mitigating measures imposed, if appropriate. Any such modifications of the site plan which will significantly increase traffic will be subject to further traffic evaluations. D. An integrated pedestrian circulation system is required including access to 212th Street, 64th Avenue South, and the proposed development to the east prior to any proposed Y development permit being issued. E. Prior to the issuance of any development permit, the Fire Chief or his designee shall review and evaluate all pertinent information and is authorized to require built-in or other fire protection systems as the Fire Chief determines necessary. Section 4. Any act consistent with the authority and prior to the effective date of this ordinance is hereby ratified and confirmed. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. DAN KELLEHER, MAYOR 3 - i Kent City Council Meeting 1 Date August 2, 1988 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: 116TH AVE. S .E. SANITARY SEWER 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was held July 21 with seven bids received. The low bid was submitted by Rodarte Construction in the amount of $72, 953 . 99 . It is recommended that this bid be accepted. 3 . EXHIBITS: Bid summary and memorandum from the Director of Public Works . 4. RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff, Examiner , Commission, etc. ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6. CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves , Councilmember seconds bid of $72, 953 . 99 from Rodarte Construction for the 116th Ave . S.E. sanitary sewer project be accepted. DISCUSSION: ACTION: Council Agenda Item No. 5A DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 28 , 1988 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don WickstromIQLU RE: 116th Avenue S.E. Sanitary Sewer Extension Bid opening was July 21st with seven bids received. The low bid was submitted by Rodarte Construction from Auburn in the amount of $72 ,953 . 99. The project will construct a sanitary sewer main on 116th Avenue S.E. from S.E. 251st Street to S.E. 246th Street to service the new Fire Training Center. Construction costs are estimated to be $80, 249.39 . Project funds were allocated in the budget for the " Fire Training Center. It is recommended the bid be accepted. BID SUMMARY Rodarte Construction, Inc. $72 , 953 . 99 Robison Construction 94 , 261. 58 R.L. Alia Company 95,993 . 12 Pape & Sons Construction 97 , 037 .58 Del Mar Construction 111, 876.47 Volker Stevin/Pacific, Inc. 124 , 699 .84 Como Contractors 148 ,826. 68 Engineer' s Estimate 83 ,738 . 58 Kent City Council Meeting Date August 2, 1988 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: 1987 SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION 2. SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening was held July 27 with six bids received. The low bid was submitted by Volker Stevin/Pacific, Inc . in the amount of $730, 139 . 86 . It is recommended that this bid be accepted. 3 . EXHIBITS: Bid summary and memorandum from the Director of Public Works . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY. (Committee, Staff , Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves, Councilmember seconds that the bid of $730, 139 . 86 from Volker Stevin/Pacific, Inc. be accepted. DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No. 5B DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS July 28, 1988 TO: Mayor Kelleher and City Council FROM: Don Wickstrom ,� RE: 1987 Sanitary Sewer Rebuild Bid opening was July 27 with six bids received. The low bid was submitted by Volker Stevin/Pacific, Inc. of Bellevue in the amount of $730, 139 .86. The project consists of rebuilding the existing sanitary sewer mains in various areas throughout the City as delineated on the attached map. Also included are the construction of a water main and overlay of several streets. A project budget of $1, 620, 000 has been established for which this contract is part thereof. Construction costs are estimated to be $803 , 153 . 85 It is recommended the bid of $730 , 139 . 86 from Volker Stevin/Pacific be accepted. BID SUMMARY Volker Stevin/Pacific, Inc. $730, 139.86 Shoreline Construction 769, 360. 93 King Construction Company 841, 452 . 66 R.L. Alia Company 843 , 242 . 31 Tri-State Construction 913, 099. 30 Robison Construction 1, 081,486. 21 Engineer's Estimate $777, 209.29 ,, {} , ' r a I ! i Y � �I- .11161 n l j PROJECT uNa � .,..J > c I.I. L s' �Ir�i,� ittt LOCATIONS 9 , d u.n I 1r _ t• Tv � , � y { � 1l Efl fON � C 01 NT /fps � � � •• .., I' rI 41 VICINITY MAP SEA LE zn, Kent City Council Meeting 0 Date August 2, 1988 Category Bids 1. SUBJECT: 1988 ASPHALT OVERLAY 2 . SUMMARY STATEMENT: Bid opening is scheduled for July 29, 1988 . The Director of Public Works will present a summary of the bids received and make a recommendation as to award. 3 . EXHIBITS: Bid summary and memorandum from the Director of Public Works . 4 . RECOMMENDED BY: (Committee, Staff , Examiner, Commission, etc . ) 5 . EXPENDITURE REQUIRED: $ SOURCE OF FUNDS: 6 . CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Councilmember moves , Councilmember seconds that the recommendation of the Public Works Director as to award of the 1988 Asphalt Overlay project be accepted. DISCUSSION: ACTION• Council Agenda Item No . 5C R E P O R T S A. COUNCIL PRESIDENT B. OPERATIONS COMMITTEE C. PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE D. PLANNING COMMITTEE E. PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE F. PARKS COMMITTEE G. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS